Josh & Anna Smuggar: A Series of Unfortunate Events

[MargeGunderson]

If it’s true that the family knew about the nature of the charges since last year, and they took steps to put properties and such in Anna’s name, yet still allowed Josh around the children, well there is a special place in hell for all of them.

[Rabbittron]

Maybe now The Losers Channel  will  wake up and cancel it. 

[Annb67]

He pleaded not guilty!! He’s going to let this go to trial? Dumbass. He’s going away for a long time and will never spend time with those kids when he eventually gets out. Wonder if he’s going to try and pin this on somebody else?

[WinnieWinkle]

Just now, JoanArc said:

The only bright spot is that this will drive a stake through the heart of the empire. Maybe.

The other bright spot is this all got started under the previous administration so the Duggars can't blame politics for this.

[IndianPaintbrush]

Images of minors under the age of 12???? 🤮

His likely defense will be that the images were inadvertently downloaded. A lot will depend on how many they pulled.

[Heathen]

I want to throw up. I just hoped it was something not child-related. 

I feel so sorry for his children. Even if they ever go non-fundie and have actual educations or jobs, they're still going to be "the pervert's kids." It's not fair to them. 

 

[LavendarRose]

I was looking forward to Josh getting charged with some sort of financial or real estate or tax crimes and then involving  a bunch of other Duggers, or JB and M at the very least.  I could then enjoy the schadenfreude of watching it all play out and all or some of them going down hard.

This just makes me sick to my stomach.  I will still watch it play out but it will be a  hate watch.  And I certainly hope that any enablers get caught as well.

[Madtown]

Sexual abuse material on children under 12! What a fucking disgusting piece of shit! I hope he gets those max 20 years, he should get life for that!

I will NEVER feel sorry for Anna. CPS needs to take those kids, I don't care if it's allowed or not, they need to be elsewhere. Now she has another one on the way. UGH! I just can't! Fuck you too Jessa!

[dariafan]

His poor children never had a chance     But I was sick when I read not allowed near minors.  

[Minivanessa]

2 hours ago, the-grey-lady said:

Oh my god, y'all.

For all the snarking I've been doing out this – and I stayed up until 2 snarking – I was so hoping for a white collar crime.

Me too.

2 hours ago, WinnieWinkle said:

#BREAKING #JoshDuggar "Duggar is charged by indictment with receiving and possessing child pornography."

So, yeah, the computer gave his sleazy ways away.  Ugh.  I wonder what the penalty for this is in Arkansas?

 

It's a federal crime so the same all over the USA. Per the press release, the penalty for each count is a sentence of up to 20 years in prison and a fine up to $250,000.

2 hours ago, riverblue22 said:

I hope he restricted his perversion to his computer.  Poor kids~

Yep. I hate to think about what he could have done if he did more than look at stuff on the computer.

Edited April 30, 2021 by Jeeves
typo

[skipnjump]

4 minutes ago, GeeGolly said:

Again, holy shit. Holy fucking shit. 😢🤬😢

Same here.   I thought it was going to be Tax Evasion/money laundering

[pally]

"Depicting children under the age of 12" 😡😭

[crazy8s]

the sun is not the most reliable source but here is what they have

https://www.the-sun.com/entertainment/2801882/josh-duggar-child-porn-charges-indictment/

[Zella]

5 minutes ago, WinnieWinkle said:

#BREAKING #JoshDuggar "Duggar is charged by indictment with receiving and possessing child pornography."

So, yeah, the computer gave his sleazy ways away.  Ugh.  I wonder what the penalty for this is in Arkansas?

 

It wont matter. It is federal, so he will be facing federal, not state, charges. 

Sorry this thread is fast-moving, and I didn't realize someone had already responded! 

I had hoped for the sake of any victims it would not be anything sexual. Ugh. 

Edited April 30, 2021 by Zella

[cmr2014]

16 minutes ago, Annb67 said:

Shit!  If Anna doesn’t leave his ass I say get cps involved and get those kids out! You know they will be sneaking those kids to him!! Damn you Josh!!

I hope so. If Josh goes to "live" on one of the other properties, I have no doubt that JB and J'chelle would welcome him back to the TTH any time he wanted to drop by, and Anna would absolutely let him spend as much time at the warehouse as he wanted.

They all see this as a Jesus issue with Josh letting "Satan build a fortress in his heart," and nothing more. What he needs is more family, and more praying, and more oversight, not prison.

I'm going to guess that his defense will be that liberals broke into the car dealership and downloaded images to smear the name of a good, God-fearing family man.

[Tabbygirl521]

This is just the worst. And to think that sleazy fuck is SMIRKING in his mugshot. 

[quarks]

1 minute ago, Annb67 said:

He pleaded not guilty!! He’s going to let this go to trial? Dumbass. He’s going away for a long time and will never spend time with those kids when he eventually gets out. Wonder if he’s going to try and pin this on somebody else?

That doesn't necessarily mean he's headed for a trial - he can always change the plea later as part of a plea bargain. 

[Kiss my mutt]

Any mother that fails to protect her children from abuse is complicit and to continue to bring more children into this? My good will ran out a long time ago for Anna but I wish her and her children safety and security outside of this fold. 

I hope this isn’t what Josh was making money off of and her crowing about him being a “diligent provider”. 

[AZChristian]

I personally know someone - a "pillar of the community" - in Texas who was charged for child porn.  Arrested in August, indicted in September, and still in Federal custody awaiting trial.

Having been sexually abused as a child, I have NO sympathy for these people.  They should throw them into solitary cells in a dungeon with no natural light, with moldy bread and brackish water.  For life.

[Panopticon]

I know a lot of us (including me) jumped to the kiddie porn theory yesterday for obvious reasons, but I’d hoped that wasn’t really it. 
 

Damn. This makes that smirking smugshot a billion times worse. I can tolerate a financial criminal smirking at his arrest even as I look forward to his incarceration. 
 

But this piece of garbage— whose teenage self got a free pass after he fingered his five-year-old-sister— SMIRKED when he was caught taking part in the exploitation of more children. It’s too much. He’s as bad as bad gets.

[MargeGunderson]

7 minutes ago, WinnieWinkle said:

#BREAKING #JoshDuggar "Duggar is charged by indictment with receiving and possessing child pornography."

So, yeah, the computer gave his sleazy ways away.  Ugh.  I wonder what the penalty for this is in Arkansas?

 

He’s facing federal charges on this. They don’t play. He’s looking at a lengthy jail sentences if convicted.

[Annb67]

I know on my state they are harsh on this. I had a friend who had a husband caught with this. 5 years PER CHARGE. Not debatable. He even was charged with RECEIVING it. If he received those files he is busted! This guy pled guilty and spent ten years in prison. He was released, registered as a sex offender. Can’t be anywhere near a school, kids, etc. 

[Boston]

20 minutes ago, Zella said:

Here's a short writeup: He is being represented by Story and someone else, and @Jeeves you guessed right on the judge.

https://www.nwahomepage.com/northwest-arkansas-news/joshua-duggar-formally-charged-remains-jailed-until-may-5/

OMG.. Run, Anna, Run.  What a scumbag

[JoanArc]

 I’m having flashbacks of Jim Bob explaining how Josh is technically not a pedophile because he missed the clinical cut off by a few months. I just really want to vomit punch something, grab the kids, and get them out of there. 

 The only silver lining is that this may prompt a few more Jill like exits. 

[Oldernowiser]

Okay, I am clueless about any of this…but that Sun article references a charge of downloading “a” photo and possessing “a” photo? Is that possible? Would they bother with going after Josh for that? 

If there’s only one, I can see a good defense attorney arguing that and winning pretty handily?

 

[madpsych78]

What are the advantages/disadvantages for Josh by pleading not guilty versus guilty?

[Zella]

Just now, Oldernowiser said:

Okay, I am clueless about any of this…but that Sun article references a charge of downloading “a” photo and possessing “a” photo? Is that possible? Would they bother with going after Josh for that? 

If there’s only one, I can see a good defense attorney arguing that and winning pretty handily?

 

FWIW, the phrasing of the actual indictment says images plural. 

[Churchhoney]

26 minutes ago, crazy8s said:

cousin emily (peters) better return to her own home

But how will Anna cope, without her cousin-mom and her mentee!!! Must have those young girls around for slave duty ! 

That's the thing that pisses me off most about the million-children thing, I think....Among many many things that piss me off about it. 

[Tikichick]

14 minutes ago, madpsych78 said:

OK, but if the charge is based on downloading stuff from the Internet, just staying in a house with no minors is not enough. He needs to not have access to the Internet as well.

That's a standard provision in these cases.   He just may be fitted with a tether if he makes bond.

[Oldernowiser]

7 minutes ago, farmgal4 said:

I think that he may off himself over this.

I don’t. He’s been Heir to the Arkansas Fundie Throne for a very long time and his parents, wife, and TLC have all kept things pretty cushy for him no matter what he did. 

As long as they can all tell themselves that it’s Satan’s fault, he’s fine. And his smug shot has that look.

The damage to the brand, however, is not something they can fix this time.

Edited April 30, 2021 by Oldernowiser

[MunichNark]

Dear fucking God, I never expected this. I am beyond horrified and disgusted. Have fun in prison, you fucking piece of shit

[crazy8s]

1 minute ago, Oldernowiser said:

Okay, I am clueless about any of this…but that Sun article references a charge of downloading “a” photo and possessing “a” photo? Is that possible? Would they bother with going after Josh for that? 

If there’s only one, I can see a good defense attorney arguing that and winning pretty handily?

 

the sun piece is their usual crap. the link someone posted above of the actual court documents tells the real story.

[iwantcookies]

Oh man it’s what I didn’t want to hear. I was hoping for $ laundering/tax evasion etc. Josh is a sick scum bag. Let’s see if DADDY will pay for an expensive lawyer...

 

 

[Scarlett45]

Moderator Announcement:

As of today charges have been made public that specifically name possession of Child Sexual Abuse Material* discussion of charges are allowed. However, discussion of the identity of the victims, or possible victims related to these charges are NOT ALLOWED.

Speculation regarding if Josh abused minors (including his children or siblings) are NOT allowed.

You may discuss the 2015 scandals and the admission of guilt, and any commentary a now adult victim has made public (this guideline has not changed).

Jokes, asides, memes etc regarding the sexual assault of anyone, INCLUDING Josh Duggar are not allowed.

A violation of these guidelines will result in warnings. 

 

*a resource regarding the importance of language choice when describing the abuse of children has been provided.

Please PM @Scarlett45 and @deaja if you have questions.

[3girlsforus]

29 minutes ago, GeeGolly said:

Well this just took the wind outta my sails. How tragic. Josh is scum.

This was my thought too. I could be gleeful about financial stuff but if this is child related, and it looks to be so, then I am just sad upon sad. I can't be happy about that - only happy that he's been caught and will root for justice. 

[Annb67]

13 minutes ago, Madtown said:

Sexual abuse material on children under 12! What a fucking disgusting piece of shit! I hope he gets those max 20 years, he should get life for that!

I will NEVER feel sorry for Anna. CPS needs to take those kids, I don't care if it's allowed or not, they need to be elsewhere. Now she has another one on the way. UGH! I just can't! Fuck you too Jessa!

20 years PER CHARGE. 

[ccphilly]

5 minutes ago, Oldernowiser said:

Okay, I am clueless about any of this…but that Sun article references a charge of downloading “a” photo and possessing “a” photo? Is that possible? Would they bother with going after Josh for that? 

If there’s only one, I can see a good defense attorney arguing that and winning pretty handily?

 

They wouldn't have charged him if it was a one off (or even 2 or 3).

 

[Oldernowiser]

I had forgotten that the raid was way back at the end of 2019. So the real question…what did Anna know and when did she know it? And yet she has another baby?

SMDH.

[Zella]

Just an FYI, this is where I have seen the actual court documents on charges:

https://www.nwahomepage.com/northwest-arkansas-news/joshua-duggar-formally-charged-remains-jailed-until-may-5/

It's embedded in there. 

[Churchhoney]

It's also possible they found evidence of more than one type of crime on that computer, and they've just started with the one that keeps him in closest custody and best protects others. 

I wouldn't put anything past Josh, JB or anyone who hangs with them. They are a messed-up bunch of toxic males with major senses of entitlement in all realms. 

Edited April 30, 2021 by Churchhoney

[Madtown]

1 minute ago, Annb67 said:

20 years PER CHARGE. 

I was so upset, I didn't even see that or know that!

 

[Ohiopirate02]

14 minutes ago, IndianPaintbrush said:

Images of minors under the age of 12???? 🤮

His likely defense will be that the images were inadvertently downloaded. A lot will depend on how many they pulled.

It is virtually impossible to inadvertently download images of this nature.  Regular adult porn, yes, these images are only available on the dark web.  You have to know about this type of shit.  I could see him claim that he was using a shared computer at the car lot, but even then that's a stretch and would also rope in any other car lot employee.  

[JoanArc]

Just now, MargeGunderson said:

I’m a little surprised that it’s “only” receiving and possessing. I wonder if distribution (sharing images with others) will get added to the charges at some point. 
 

 We don’t know enough about the circumstances to tell if he distributed or not.  The only details I really want to know is that children were not harmed. 

 

[FizzyPuff]

Fuck Josh Duggar! Sick Fuck! And Fuck Mechelle & JB you assholes created this mess.

[JoanArc]

1 minute ago, Ohiopirate02 said:

It is virtually impossible to inadvertently download images of this nature.  Regular adult porn, yes, these images are only available on the dark web.  You have to know about this type of shit.  I could see him claim that he was using a shared computer at the car lot, but even then that's a stretch and would also rope in any other car lot employee.  

Yes.  There have been cases of people caught with images of 17-year-olds that they thought were of legal age. But the whole 12-year-old disclaimer pretty much blows out any argument that this could be accidental. 

[Churchhoney]

So TLC's record for airing "family" shows starring various kinds of abusers and other criminals just got even better. When will they figure out that people who clamor to have that kind of "reality" show are poor risks. 

Edited April 30, 2021 by Churchhoney

[Future Cat Lady]

1 minute ago, JoanArc said:

 We don’t know enough about the circumstances to tell if he distributed or not.  The only details I really want to know is that children were not harmed. 

 

It's CP. Children were harmed.

[GeeGolly]

1 minute ago, JoanArc said:

 We don’t know enough about the circumstances to tell if he distributed or not.  The only details I really want to know is that children were not harmed. 

 

No matter what the charges are, children were harmed.

[mynextmistake]

10 minutes ago, cmr2014 said:

I hope so. If Josh goes to "live" on one of the other properties, I have no doubt that JB and J'chelle would welcome him back to the TTH any time he wanted to drop by, and Anna would absolutely let him spend as much time at the warehouse as he wanted.

They all see this as a Jesus issue with Josh letting "Satan build a fortress in his heart," and nothing more. What he needs is more family, and more praying, and more oversight, not prison.

I'm going to guess that his defense will be that liberals broke into the car dealership and downloaded images to smear the name of a good, God-fearing family man.

The feds don’t play around with bail conditions, though. If Josh is released, he’s either going to be on an ankle monitor that will track his location or have a 24-hour third-party custodian to monitor his movements. And keep in mind that this case will get serious press attention and all eyes will be on the Duggars. If he violates his conditions someone will inform the Feds. They’ll revoke his bail (bye-bye JB’s money), he’ll go back to jail and His third-party custodian could then face charges for not monitoring him appropriately. 
 

CPS should be monitoring things too, and if Anna sneaks the kids in to see him or let’s him come to the house those kids will be removed from her custody. They won’t be placed with JB and Michelle, either — the best she could hope for is that they’d go to the Kellers or one of Josh’s siblings, who I damn well hope would keep him away so they don’t lose their own kids, 

That’s what I’m telling myself, at least. 

[3girlsforus]

24 minutes ago, WinnieWinkle said:

#BREAKING #JoshDuggar "Duggar is charged by indictment with receiving and possessing child pornography."

So, yeah, the computer gave his sleazy ways away.  Ugh.  I wonder what the penalty for this is in Arkansas?

 

He's been arrested by the feds - so it will be whatever the federal penalties are for it... and they are severe. Not sure the specifics but it's not insignificant.