MyPeopleAreNordic May 23, 2015 Share May 23, 2015 There's no way to keep the show on the air without continuing to reward JimBob and Michelle for their cover-up and hypocrisy. It's truly unfortunate that the victims will also be harmed financially.IF TLC had any decency, they would cancel any further payments to the parents and use the money to set up a trust fund for the victims that their parents can't touch. Not that they wouldn't guilt the money out of the girls anyway. I hope someone from TLC has spoken with the older girls (at least the married ones who are out from under Jim Bob's "headship") and offered them their own show apart from the parents. I'd watch Jessa/Ben, Jill/Derrick, & the older girls in a spin-off. I hope that someone at TLC has thought about this and is in contact with the older girls and offering them this. 2 Link to comment
Kcat1971 May 23, 2015 Share May 23, 2015 No. It said that to the child Pee-pee holder was vagina. Actually, it was both. Page 29 1st paragraph. Witness is show male drawing, identifies penis as pee-pee holder, then is show female drawing and identifies vagina as pee-pee holder. It is just speculation but it appears that boys were show both male & female drawing, while girls were only shown girl drawings. 3 Link to comment
BitterApple May 23, 2015 Share May 23, 2015 The impression that I got was that sending Josh to do labor and the talk with the State trooper were supposed to scare Josh straight. I would imagine that sadly many families would worry about their reputation if something like this came out, and by this time JB had even been in politics. So I image they would want to avoid official proceedings that could leave a record or become a scandal in their community. So they tried to deal with it within the family, so to speak. This is my impression, of course. I could be wrong. Absolutely and to be fair to JimBob and Michelle, this is how many families handle this sort of tragedy. If every incident of sexual abuse was reported there'd be a lot more teenaged boys in juvie right now. I think where the Duggars erred was a) not sending Josh to a legitimate, professionally run treatment program b) not seeking counseling for their daughters and c) allowing Josh to return to the home where he only ended up re-offending. As much as I loathe them, in their minds they probably believed they were doing the right thing yet they failed miserably. 10 Link to comment
Cherrio May 23, 2015 Share May 23, 2015 No. It said that to the child Pee-pee holder was vagina. Regarding the show continuing with the focus on the older girls.... maybe they wouldn't want to. If they are as brainwashed into the cult as they supposedly are, all modest and whatever, maybe they wouldn't want to continuing knowing that whoever is watching would know what happened. But then again, money is important to this family, maybe it would trump shame. The report actually stated that the child referred to BOTH female and male genitalia as pee pee holders 1 Link to comment
ChicksDigScars May 23, 2015 Share May 23, 2015 There would have to be a hook. A show that is solely based on Jill and Derick or Jessa and Ben would get stale. If Jana and Jinger were also out of the house, maybe they could center a show around "daughters on their own." Maybe Jill and Jessa adjusting to married life and motherhood, while at the same time, Jinger and Jana going to school for the first time. JoyAnna is screwed until October when she turns 18. THAT would require total freedom from their parents. Their own contracts. Personally, I hope that they are able to get some of the money that JB has. If they are the "driving force" behind the success of the show, and TLC KNOWS that, they deserve a substantial cut. Wanna bet some lawyer is chomping at the bit to represent the adult daughters? 4 Link to comment
kathe5133 May 23, 2015 Share May 23, 2015 "If you tell the truth it becomes part of your past, if you lie it becomes part of your future". I don't know who "said" this, but it is something I have always believed and practiced. This issue demonstrates the resounding truth of that statement. The show should not continue, even without Josh. My defense of these folks has always been "they are not hurting anyone...." Well there is now proof that they have. They are not role models. They are human, they made a "mistake", is not a defense. They are fundamentally broken and shouldn't be held up as any kind of role models. Unless they are going to change the entire show to "Surviveing Incest" and bring in professionals to oversee, I don't see how it can continue. I can not imagine who would sponsor it or who would watch. I feel it just needs to be over. 16 Link to comment
backformore May 23, 2015 Share May 23, 2015 Jim Bob (referred to in the report as “James”) first learned of Josh’s behavior in March 2002, when one victim approached Jim Bob and said that Josh touched her breasts and genitals while she slept. Jim Bob appears not to have acted on the accusation. In July 2002, Josh, then 14 years old, admitted to the behavior to his father, prompting Jim Bob to “discipline” Josh but not report the incident to the authorities. In July 2003, his father and church elders took him to a state trooper to confess what he’d done. The trooper, Cpl. Hutchins, gave Josh a “very stern talk” but did not charge him with any crimes. InTouch reports that Hutchins was later arrested on child pornography charges and is currently serving 56 years in prison. In December 2006, (Josh is now 16) Springdale police interviewed the Duggars about Josh’s behavior. Jim Bob would not produce Josh for questioning—per InTouch, “when police asked Jim Bob to bring Josh in for an interview in 2006, he attempted to hire a lawyer and refused to produce his son for questioning. At least two lawyers refused to take his case.” Jim Bob Duggar could have possibly been charged for obstruction of justice, but he wasn't. This might possibly be the subject for Oprah's show in ten years. The Duggar Family how is he 14 in 2002 and only 16 in 2006? Link to comment
HumblePi May 23, 2015 Share May 23, 2015 how is he 14 in 2002 and only 16 in 2006? That's true, he's 17 not yet a legal adult of 18 Link to comment
parisprincess May 23, 2015 Share May 23, 2015 After what some of the girls went through, I wonder how they felt when they had to chaperone Joshie and Anna while they were courting to make sure they didn't cross any lines. What a horrible position to be put in. The asshole abuses you, and then you have to make sure his pure, innocent girlfriend doesn't have to suffer the same fate. 22 Link to comment
EarlGreyTea May 23, 2015 Share May 23, 2015 how is he 14 in 2002 and only 16 in 2006? Yeah, that caught my eye. I was born the same year as Josh and I turned 18 in 2006. Am I missing some detail here? Link to comment
Cherrio May 23, 2015 Share May 23, 2015 I am not interested in the show continuing in any manner. It would not be in the best interest of anyone. Being on reality tv as a way to make a living has shown time and time again that it is not only terrible for children but its not realistic. I don't give a shit about Michelle and JB, but I do hope all the adult and minor children get every opportunity to be lead out of the lives they have been living. People who have been brainwashed/living in cults do not magically start living healthy lives. Sadly, some stay, some have bad endings, but some do recover and go on to live a good life. But it takes years and a lot of help. I have to think there are at least of couple out of the 19 who have waited or hoped for a way out. I would assume they would try and help their siblings too. I have no idea what will happen because I have always viewed this family as a perverted cult freak show and I cannot imagine what it was like actually being there and living that way. I just hope that the best and healthiest outcome happens. 7 Link to comment
Bella May 23, 2015 Share May 23, 2015 Just a reminder: Let's not speculate about the siblings who weren't involved. That means we do know* about Josh, we know* there were 4 of the 5 oldest sisters molested, and we know* the Duggar parents found out and (mis)handled it. Bringing in the names of other siblings as even potentially having similar issues isn't fair to them. If something comes out about them, fine. But that hasn't happened. Let's assume they're completely innocent, okay? We've got more than enough to talk about as it is! *I am using a broad definition of "know." My DH is an attorney. I realize we should be sticking "alleged" into many of these statements, etc., etc., etc. But this is a forum for discussing television, and we know what we mean by "know" here. Thanks! 17 Link to comment
HumblePi May 23, 2015 Share May 23, 2015 Maybe the whistle blower was Marjorie's family? Maybe Si let them in on some things but couldn't summon up the courage to do it himself. It seems that there was more than one whistle blower but their identities will probably never be disclosed. This link may provide you with more information as to the 'whistle blower(s)'. http://defamer.gawker.com/the-web-has-known-about-josh-duggar-for-years-when-did-1706258269 1 Link to comment
PinkSprinkles May 23, 2015 Share May 23, 2015 Airbrushing Josh out? With or without some inevitably lame explanation? When Remy from Cake Boss was implicated and charged in a molestation case involving a relative TLC simply pulled all episodes featuring him and obscured his face in any episodes where you saw him in the background working. Something similar could be done on 19 Kids and Counting. They simply stop featuring any episodes that revolve around Josh and Anna and either cut out scenes of Josh in other episodes or blur out his face if he ends up in background shots. 2 Link to comment
Bergler May 23, 2015 Share May 23, 2015 Absolutely and to be fair to JimBob and Michelle, this is how many families handle this sort of tragedy. If every incident of sexual abuse was reported there'd be a lot more teenaged boys in juvie right now. I think where the Duggars erred was a) not sending Josh to a legitimate, professionally run treatment program b) not seeking counseling for their daughters and c) allowing Josh to return to the home where he only ended up re-offending. As much as I loathe them, in their minds they probably believed they were doing the right thing yet they failed miserably.I would add a huge last error to your list... Deciding during that same time frame to put their family in the public spotlight via TLC. Which, quite frankly, leads me to believe that their quest for fame/money/a platform to showcase their godliness was more important to them than their own damn family. I mean seriously, who does this? I don't know if it's stupidity, hubris, or just plain lack of self awareness to even consider such a thing.Not to mention doubling down over the years with the whole "family values" movement (how I despise those words) and putting Josh into a career in the public eye. Hello? Horrible people, horrible parents and I doubt Jim Bob and Michelle will ever really get what most of the world is thinking about them right now. Pot meet kettle. 9 Link to comment
satrunrose May 23, 2015 Share May 23, 2015 (edited) Our sources say there's a strong sense axing Josh would not materially hurt the show. We're told TLC has done research and it shows the daughters have become the driving force. The weddings of Jill and Jessa were ratings successes, as was the birth of Jill's baby. If this is true, then the folks at TLC are even stupider than I thought. Yes, the girls are the source of most of the ratings, but there are good reasons for that which have been made moot points by what has happened. Before this broke, I think the fans were watching to see the girls have their happily-ever-after story (which quickly turns into the ho-hum Anna wrangling four small children story anyway) casual folks were watching because weddings and babies have always been a good part of TLC's bread and butter, and critics (like us) were watching to see if and how the children's lives would change away from their many responsibilities and restrictive rules. Everything's changed now. Jill's totally neat-ing and clingy-ness used to be seen as an an effect of her naive and limited experience. Now we learn that the older girls aren't even a little bit naive and Jim-Bob's "umbrella of protection" was about as much use as a kleenex in a hurricane. Those girls have seen and repeatedly been party to some of the darkest sides of human experience. The twenty going on twelve thing isn't endearing, or silly anymore. It's disturbing. Who could watch that, whether the show acknowledges Josh or not? Edited May 23, 2015 by satrunrose 20 Link to comment
Ilovemylabs May 23, 2015 Share May 23, 2015 (edited) First, a minor point. There are some references upthread to "FOIA," the Freedom of Information Act. The FOIA that most people think of is the federal law. That governs agencies of the federal government, but does not apply to any state or local government agencies. Each state has its own laws that apply within its borders to state/local agencies. Many of those laws are called "open records acts," although the Arkansas state law is called the "Freedom of Information Act of 1967." I did a quick read of the Arkansas FOIA, and like a lot of these state laws, it has a much shorter deadline for the government agency to produce records, than federal FOIA imposes on federal agencies. It's a 24-hour turnaround, or 3 days in certain cases. There are (obviously) exemptions for some law enforcement records. ("Hey, I think you're investigating me for drug dealing, and I demand to see those files!" - ain't happening.) I don't think we need to go further into that, but I posted the link if anyone's curious. Frankly, I don't care all that much how the story finally broke, I'm just glad that the police reports did get released. Okay, I'm of two minds about it. Because the victims are still in the clutches of the Duggar family, and will remain so. Now that the public knows, I fear their parents will subject them to even more pressure - including issuing statements absolving/forgiving Josh (AARGH!!). I think the idea of any of the kids "breaking free" is just wishful thinking. With the possible exception of John David. The girls/women will continue to "keep sweet" on the outside no matter what they think and feel. That life is all they have ever known. I think that we who see the Duggars on TV, and read about them here, tend to forget, is just how rich and powerful Jim Bob and Michelle are. They are BIG fish in their local/state pond, with an adoring fanbase of fundies nationwide. TLC must have paid them millions over the years, and I'd bet lunch that JB's banked a whole lot of it. They keep up their "modest" facade, wearing cheap clothes and flip flops. But they have plenty of money, and I"m damn sure that everybody in their vicinity knows it, and also knows that the Duggars are well connected politically. I honestly think, and I hate it, that none of the girls will ever break free from the domination of JB and ME-chelle. Regardless of age or marital status. Let's hope I'm wrong. Is it beyond the realm of possibility to think that some of the victims might genuinely have forgiven their brother on their own, without pressure from the parents? They may never view him the same way again, but I believe that real forgiveness is possible. Edited May 23, 2015 by Ilovemylabs 5 Link to comment
BostonBlonde May 23, 2015 Share May 23, 2015 "The abuser is usually abused themselves". While I know it's true for some, I think it's thought of/said as more of a coping, accepting method for those who wouldn't dream of hurting a child...I know my abuser was NOT abused..he was just a sick, perverted individual who decided on his OWN. As a victim, I have ZERO desire to hurt anyone. I have met many people who have been in the same situation & NONE, ZERO, ZILCH wanted to harm anyone. It nauseates most victims. 14 Link to comment
Kippy May 23, 2015 Share May 23, 2015 I have to defend the duggar parents a little bit on this. There is so much speculation and assumptions being made but based on what I know I don't think that I would have acted much differently as a parent. If I were made aware of an incident between my son and daughter, I would be equally concerned about both of them. Obviously for different reasons but just because one did a horrible thing doesn't make me love him less or want to protect him less. If I thought it was a singular occurrence than I would talk to him about it and try to deal with him in family. When I learned of more bad behavior, I would get counsel from others and if I knew a family friend in law enforcement it doesn't seem unreasonable to go to them. Did Jimbob know this officer was a gross child porn man? Maybe but that is all purely speculation. What if he thought the guy was clean and trusted? It seems natural if you are taking a child that you love to the police to pick someone you know and think is a good guy. I would maybe even choose to send the offender to the build a house/mentor/counseling thing. Yes it isn't official psych work but perhaps the guy is really good at counseling people. From a purely fact based standpoint, I don't see anything bad here especially given their religious views. I don't know the motivations of JimBob and Michelle and I don't know what political aspirations they had but on the surface everything seems rational. Yes they should have gotten official counseling for all of the kids but what if they couldn't afford it at the time? 5 Link to comment
Mountainair May 23, 2015 Share May 23, 2015 For the sake of Josh and Anna's kids I hope some trusted friend or non Duggar family member came and secreted the kids away while all of this stews in the media. I imagine all the compounds are covered with reporters ready to exploite those babies. My children are the same age as theirs and I can't imagine what fear must be running through their little minds right now. My wish is that someone is at Disney World with those babies having a great time while their parents deal with this shit. Link to comment
frenchtoast May 23, 2015 Share May 23, 2015 Like Kippy, I've been discussing this my husband as we are parents to a 12 year old boy and a 9 year old girl. What if we found out something like this. We already know he's seen naughty stuff on youtube, we've told him masturbation is normal. Private, but normal. Balance is key. Those pictures are faaaaaaake. In general, he's a kind sensitive kid (whick works against him in 7th grade!). So I posed the hypothetical, what would we do if we found out. First, we'd call his therapist, who is a mandatory reporter. She would get us the information about counseling for the daughter. Then we'd have to sit down with the school. Thankfully, we have a good relationship with his therapist and his teachers. But, I can say, as his mother, I could not banish him from the house. Then again, he would most likely be charged and I would have no choice. But, I could not absent myself from helping him. It would be an incredibly difficult to help both my children, but I would strive to do my best. The hardest thing would be knowing that I couldn't fix it. All of this is to say, I understand why they haven't completely written Josh off. Everything else? Well, that's just beyond the pale enraging. But I can understand not disavowing him entirely when he was 15. Now? As an adult? Hell yeah. But I couldn't do it to my 12 year old. I just couldn't. I also would never, ever, EVER blame my daughter. And I would do everything I could to help her. It would be all around horrible and I hate to think about it. 21 Link to comment
HumblePi May 23, 2015 Share May 23, 2015 He didn't go to the police. He went to his State Trooper (not police at all) friend who most likely would help him scam used car buyers with false inspections. State Police have jurisdiction throughout the entire state. Local police officers have jurisdiction within their own town. Unfortunately, or fortunately, depending on what side of the uniform you're standing, the State Trooper only gave Josh a 'stern warning' and didn't follow through on charges. But of course that's understandable since he was later arrested and convicted for child pornography and sentenced to 60 years in an Arkansas State prison. 1 Link to comment
ToukieSmith May 23, 2015 Share May 23, 2015 Hah. Suck on that, Duggars. Your show's success and driving force has been your DAUGHTERS. The women. The males in your family are NOT the center of the universe. Suck it, Sadly, it does not matter because the pimps continue to control the money. When you control the money, you control everything. 9 Link to comment
ZoloftBlob May 23, 2015 Share May 23, 2015 (edited) When Remy from Cake Boss was implicated and charged in a molestation case involving a relative TLC simply pulled all episodes featuring him and obscured his face in any episodes where you saw him in the background working. Something similar could be done on 19 Kids and Counting. They simply stop featuring any episodes that revolve around Josh and Anna and either cut out scenes of Josh in other episodes or blur out his face if he ends up in background shots. Its a different situation. Remy wasn't that big of a "character". Also, Remy hadn't been using his fame to push a political agenda of hate towards others. There's no way TLC can continue on without Josh and without any explanation, because Jimbob and Michelle AND Josh have been so vocal about how they are all about protecting their children from evil molestors and how they are *living godly*. Any show where Michelle is not asked if she considers herself a failure as a parent and a hypocrite for her message of hate towards others, and any show where she is not asked why she is so worried about transgender molesters when she allowed her son to molest her daughters, is wrong. TLC can't whitewash the fact that Jimbob and Michelle have been held up as lovely Christian parents to be emulated. Any episode with Josh "whited out" will lead to the question of "Why won't the Duggars address the molestation issue, why is that molester in their home with their other children, how is it godly to allow a serial child molester access to potential victims?" TLC can't take that heat and its not going to go away. Is it beyond the realm of possibility to think that some of the victims might genuinely have forgiven their brother on their own, without pressure from the parents? They may never view him the same way again, but I believe that real forgiveness is possible. In theory, I agree with you. But based on the religious beliefs the Duggars espouse, and how they have handled the event (ie not seeking real treatment, allowing Josh access to the children, telling the girls to keep covered up and that they musn't tempt men) I find it hard to believe any forgiveness wasn't part of a guilt trip where the girls were blamed for tempting their brother. If a Duggar girl has genuinely forgiven her brother and doesn't couch it in terms of how she was partly at fault, ok. Right now, the girls aren't even allowed to talk, the "they've forgiven" stuff is all coming from Mom and Dad Duggar and Joshie. Edited May 23, 2015 by ZoloftBlob 11 Link to comment
leighroda May 23, 2015 Share May 23, 2015 For the victims sake, unless they want the show to continue, I hope they can handle this privately. All of this is hard enough to deal with and I'm sure doing it in the public eye just makes it harder. While the parents chose to be in the public eye and I don't so much feel bad for them, the kids didn't, so I give them a pass at owing any explanation. What makes me mad, yes from now on anywhere Josh goes he is going to have people whispering "he's the one wo touched his sisters"... But HIS actions caused that. His sisters are going to have the exact same treatment with people whispering "is she one of the ones touched" but she had no control. I have several people on my Facebook feed arguing that he was only 14 and would I want to be judged by things I did when I was 14...yet the victims were even younger and they are now having to relive what may have been one of the most painful experiences in their life with America watching. 6 Link to comment
Happyfatchick May 23, 2015 Share May 23, 2015 I hope someone from TLC has spoken with the older girls (at least the married ones who are out from under Jim Bob's "headship") and offered them their own show apart from the parents. I'd watch Jessa/Ben, Jill/Derrick, & the older girls in a spin-off. I hope that someone at TLC has thought about this and is in contact with the older girls and offering them this. I hope they at least test the waters for a yearly special about the girls and their growing families. Maybe a special on Si's wedding. Izzy's first birthday party. Jessa's delivery. Just go back to "specials" mode, but make it about the kids. Maybe light cameos from the parents (please, not TH bits with JB and M!). I'm sure TLC isn't ready to split completely. I actually hope not. I'd like to see some updates at least down the road. 2 Link to comment
MyPeopleAreNordic May 23, 2015 Share May 23, 2015 (edited) As someone who recently had a baby, had tough pregnancy, and complications from the birth, I just want to say my heart goes out to the very pregnant Anna and pregnant Jessa as well as new mom Jill. When I was pregnant, I often felt like I was "too pregnant for this" - "this" being anything from the southern heat to family drama. I can't imagine being pregnant and going through this (especially Anna, as she has 3 kids to care for as well). I am sure they all feel "too pregnant for this to all come out in the public now." I am hoping they are able to get some rest. Jill's birth didn't go as planned, which can be devastating (and I think puts you at a higher risk of PPD). It took me several months to process what had happened during/after my child's birth and it was nowhere near as dramatic as what happened with Izzy & Jill. My guess is she's still recovering mentally from the trauma surrounding the birth and now she has to to through this being leaked as well. I'm sending them positive thoughts. I hope that Jessa & Jill can find support in their husbands and that these young guys (especially Ben since he's so much younger) are being the strong men that their wives need right now. And I hope Anna has someone outside of the Duggar fold that she can lean on for real support. Does she have a sister or other family member who has left Gothardism & to whom she can go to if needed? Edited May 23, 2015 by MyPeopleAreNordic 8 Link to comment
JenCarroll May 23, 2015 Share May 23, 2015 I hope they at least test the waters for a yearly special about the girls and their growing families. Maybe a special on Si's wedding. Izzy's first birthday party. Jessa's delivery. Just go back to "specials" mode, but make it about the kids. Maybe light cameos from the parents (please, not TH bits with JB and M!). I'm sure TLC isn't ready to split completely. I actually hope not. I'd like to see some updates at least down the road. I actually think something like that is the most likely outcome. I'm not endorsing it, and no one knows what will happen over the next few months. But as things stand now, this is probably what both TLC and Jim Bob and Michelle are hoping for. Link to comment
msblossom May 23, 2015 Share May 23, 2015 I hope someone from TLC has spoken with the older girls (at least the married ones who are out from under Jim Bob's "headship") and offered them their own show apart from the parents. I'd watch Jessa/Ben, Jill/Derrick, & the older girls in a spin-off. I hope that someone at TLC has thought about this and is in contact with the older girls and offering them this. They're all still connected to JB. As long as they live in the houses that JB provides, he remains in control of them -- married or not. And as far as the older unmarried Duggar girls go, he has even more control over them. I don't want to see a spin off of any kind and I hope the show gets permanently canned. But I can see TLC glossing over everything and no longer filming Josh, and do what JB &M attempted and that's get rid of the problem and pretend it never existed. The Duggars are their #1 show and they will try to find a way to salvage it. 4 Link to comment
MyPeopleAreNordic May 23, 2015 Share May 23, 2015 (edited) My secret hope is that Jill & Derrick and/or Jessa & Ben have been hoarding the money they've made from being on the show and were planning their escape. When they figured they had enough, they leaked the info and they're now preparing to start life away from TTH. Edited May 23, 2015 by MyPeopleAreNordic 5 Link to comment
Darknight May 23, 2015 Share May 23, 2015 I hope these girls don't take advice from their stupid ass fans who keeps writing they don't need therapy and the only therapy that can heal is Jesus Christ and the bible. Wtf. 19 Link to comment
Fiddle Dee Dee May 23, 2015 Share May 23, 2015 I would also miss seeing the kids. I thought how could they revamped this show without mom and dad and Josh? Does anyone think they should have an honest sit down interview, from, their home, just Michelle and JB, to finally be real and face the true fans who have watched all these years? Link to comment
Fiddle Dee Dee May 23, 2015 Share May 23, 2015 Not that it would make lite of anything just own up. I might not be explaining it right, I hope people here get what I'm trying to say. Link to comment
RazzleberryPie May 23, 2015 Share May 23, 2015 (edited) This theory is making more and more sense to me. Maybe one of them had a heart-to-heart with her MIL? Jill could have been having a bad day, Derick's back at work, Cathy's over at the McMansion helping with Izzy - Jill get the weepies and suddenly everything spills out? Cathy strikes me as the type who would know what to do - and wouldn't be shy about it either. Maybe both the senior Seewalds and the Byrums went to visit Boob & Me-chelle together? OMG - I'd have bought tickets to see the look on Boob's face. If Cathy is concerned enough for the welfare of her grandchild, maybe. Cathy's husband (Derrick's stepfather) seems Very Unimpressed with the Duggars, which actually makes me really like him. If he blew the whistle, wouldn't surprise me either. Ben's mom would defer to her husband, but Ben's had issues with Jim Bob, and seems like a bull in a china shop. I don't think he'd hold back if he thought there was some danger. I hope they at least test the waters for a yearly special about the girls and their growing families. Maybe a special on Si's wedding. Izzy's first birthday party. Jessa's delivery. Just go back to "specials" mode, but make it about the kids. Maybe light cameos from the parents (please, not TH bits with JB and M!). I'm sure TLC isn't ready to split completely. I actually hope not. I'd like to see some updates at least down the road. There's no way the can legitimately have any more episodes focusing on JB and Michelle's standards for purity, or their constant, neverending, inappropriate talk about sex. Edited to add: I am speculating myself that Derrick's absence and the looks of dread and tension when Jill arrived have something to do with someone from Derrick's family (or even Derrick) slipping up and leaking the info. I know Derrick had surgery blah blah, but I'm trying to wrap my mind around who/why this is only surfacing in a widespread manner right now. I also wonder if eyes's stinkeye and disgusted almost snort at Anna saying "we're sticking with the Ms for now, we'll see about later [sic]" was because Jessa thinks Anna is a fool for having more kids with Josh, despite the gravy train about to end. Edited May 23, 2015 by RazzleberryPie 4 Link to comment
msblossom May 23, 2015 Share May 23, 2015 I would also miss seeing the kids. I thought how could they revamped this show without mom and dad and Josh? Does anyone think they should have an honest sit down interview, from, their home, just Michelle and JB, to finally be real and face the true fans who have watched all these years? No. 19 Link to comment
Wellfleet May 23, 2015 Share May 23, 2015 (edited) Just as an FYI, the author of the WashPost article is their TV critic. He's the friend of a very smart friend of mine, and she has nothing but good things to say about him. However, I think there's a lot of wishful thinking in his article. Seriously, would JimBob ever allow an honest depiction of that family? As greedy as that bigoted, narcissistic moron is, I can't imagine he would do that for any amount of money. Nor do I believe that TLC is capable of shifting gears to producing a straight documentary. Anything that would be produced would end up putting the parents in a positive light ("we made mistakes and we learned, good for us!"), and that is completely unacceptable. I expect a tell-all book from one of the Duggars, possibly even one of the victims, though it will likely be years from now. Out of 19 kids, at least one will break ranks, reject their upbringing, and expose the b.s. Agree. TLC could never make a Frontline-quality documentary of this show and at this point. Unless, that is, they're willing to bring in a Frontline-quality staff to do it. And I'd bet my retirement fund they won't be doing that. I also honestly wonder whether or not Boob wants to continue with the show. I admit my initial reaction was 'Oh boy, I'll bet Boob will do anything to keep that TLC cash rolling in...' But now I'm really wondering if he would. Maybe he would prefer to sink beneath the waves again. I have to say that financially I'm not worried about them. He's a millionaire several times over and probably has, in actuality, much more $ than we think. In the end I think the reasons to end the show will outweigh those to keep it. Maybe Boob will hold a family meeting and for the first time in his life, ASK, rather than TELL, the kids what they want to do. Edited May 23, 2015 by Wellfleet 2 Link to comment
HumblePi May 23, 2015 Share May 23, 2015 For the victims sake, unless they want the show to continue, I hope they can handle this privately. All of this is hard enough to deal with and I'm sure doing it in the public eye just makes it harder. While the parents chose to be in the public eye and I don't so much feel bad for them, the kids didn't, so I give them a pass at owing any explanation. What makes me mad, yes from now on anywhere Josh goes he is going to have people whispering "he's the one wo touched his sisters"... But HIS actions caused that. His sisters are going to have the exact same treatment with people whispering "is she one of the ones touched" but she had no control. I have several people on my Facebook feed arguing that he was only 14 and would I want to be judged by things I did when I was 14...yet the victims were even younger and they are now having to relive what may have been one of the most painful experiences in their life with America watching. People seem to think that the sexual molesting of his sisters was a one time thing, or over a short period of time, it wasn't. The inappropriate sexual touching went on for as many as 4 years that we know of. I don't think that the Duggar girls that were molested should feel in any way guilty for being molested, but I'm pretty certain they were made do feel that way by not 'binding their breasts' tight enough, or wearing skirts that showed the bottom of their knees. Don't forget that this cult empowers males and denigrates women. In their self-righteous beliefs, if a man commits any carnal sins, it's all the fault of the female for making him molest them by not being modest enough. 11 Link to comment
trimthatfat May 23, 2015 Share May 23, 2015 I have no interest in a spinoff. I honestly think the show should be cancelled and everyone should get the help they need off-camera. There is no way the show can continue without acknowledging a huge issue like this. It wouldn't be appropriate to just exclude Josh/Anna and not even explain why. Same for Michelle and Jim Bob. 10 Link to comment
JoanArc May 23, 2015 Share May 23, 2015 I think giving the girls their own show would be an entirely new universe of exploitation and bad taste. I want to see Jim Bob, Michelle, and Josh picking through dumpsters for their next meal. And all the others with happy lives. 12 Link to comment
Darknight May 23, 2015 Share May 23, 2015 You *know* Josh Duggar is sitting at home right now, super-eager to tell you how gay marriage in Ireland will be bad for children. If the show comes back viewers will never be able to look at this family the same. I mean what if Michelle talks about how mowing the lawn in your binkini is sinful. Viewers would say but your son molested 5 girls and they wear skirts that didn't prevent them from being molested. As hard as it will be initially, this family should stop living on the dime of TLC. I think the best chance all of the kids have to live a "normal " life is to stop living with film crews and giving interviews, etc. It's not a normal way to grow up. Maybe they can actually get an education and experience some real life. TLC needs to cancel this show permanently. They would be doing the whole family a big favor. I agree but then I don't. At least the crew could make sure the kids aren't being beat with rods like some of the older girls were 5 Link to comment
lilabennet May 23, 2015 Share May 23, 2015 (edited) I have only watched bits and pieces of episodes here and there, and I have never been on a Duggar board before, so I am sorry if this has been addressed in the past on PTV, but I have a question about the money that has been earned through the show. I thought it would make sense to ask here because of posts expressing concern about the financial future of the younger children post-TLC, and I hope there is a lawyerly type here who can help me out: Do any child actor laws apply to reality TV stars in situations like this? Isn't it a legal requirement that children who earn money at a young age are supposed to save a significant portion of their earnings for their use after they turn 18? I know they are not "acting" in the traditional sense, but I think an argument can be made that appearing on this show has been their job, so a portion of the "salary" must be put aside for them to use at their discretion without any reference to their parents' directives on how to spend that money. Am I way off base? I assume that as of right now the parents have not set individual accounts aside for their children, because it has not been addressed on each child's 18th birthday. But that doesn't necessarily mean that they are in accord with whatever law would cover a case like this. If one of the kids had to take this to civil court to set a new precedent, what are their chances of winning? (I know this assumes that any of them would actually be interested in suing their parents in the first place; I am mostly interested in the hypothetical.) I just would really like for these children to have some independent financial protection once the show is canceled, which I think is the most likely outcome. And even if the show isn't canceled, I still think they deserve to be paid for their work! Edited May 23, 2015 by lilabennet Link to comment
lbsm330 May 23, 2015 Share May 23, 2015 Cosmo is also running a similar story as TMZ and WP, saying industry insiders are buzzing that the show will go on without josh. Their exact words were the girls are the "cash cows". My stomach turned when I read that. I'm just speculating and basing on my own emotions, but if it were me, I absolutely wouldn't want to continue being on the show after this coming out. I'm sure most of us can agree that the girls are being put on a massive guilt trip that they must continue the show for the family's livelihood. I swear it's taking all I have not to drive to Arkansas and post up outside the house hoping to take the girls away to a much better life. 7 Link to comment
Chai May 23, 2015 Share May 23, 2015 I sent an email to TLC/Discovery demanding they help Josh's victims. Mods may I post the email address? 1 Link to comment
Bella May 23, 2015 Share May 23, 2015 Lilabennet, the quick answer is that it depends on the state. NY and CA have the strongest laws protecting children in reality TV, and most other states's laws are pretty weak if they even exist in the first place. Someone else will likely have a more complete explanation, but the short answer is to not count on the Duggar kids getting any help from that angle. I sent an email to TLC/Discovery demanding they help Josh's victims. Mods may I post the email address? Let me check with the other mods. We'll let you know as soon as we can. 3 Link to comment
SometimesBites May 23, 2015 Share May 23, 2015 I would also miss seeing the kids. I thought how could they revamped this show without mom and dad and Josh? Does anyone think they should have an honest sit down interview, from, their home, just Michelle and JB, to finally be real and face the true fans who have watched all these years? No, I don't think they should do that. Jim Bob and Michelle Duggar are delusional. "Honest" and "real" are concepts to which they pay lip service, while building fences to hold actual truth and honesty at bay. The Duggar parents wouldn't know actual truth if it bit them on the pee-pee holder. 20 Link to comment
Popular Post skatelady May 23, 2015 Popular Post Share May 23, 2015 There's definitely more to this story than has been published so far. I mean, this began to unravel due to a note found in a book from the Duggar home? A book? Not possible. (^^ lame attempt at humor in a dark situation) 33 Link to comment
Churchhoney May 23, 2015 Share May 23, 2015 I don't think that any of our everyday reasons for going everywhere but the law when a situation like this breaks in one's home would obtain in this case. Looks to me as if JimBob was running for the GOP U.S. Senate nomination at the exact time he learned about what Josh was doing, and he was trying to out-family-value incumbent Tim Hutchinson, whose family-values cred was tarnished a few years earlier when he divorced his wife of nearly 30 years to marry a woman who worked for him. That being the case, and given JimBob's obvious (to me, anyway) thirst for control, power and money, he must have been absolutely beside himself trying to sweep this whole problem under the rug lest it tarnish his family-values cred, too. Under those circumstances, turning Josh in to authorities, moving Josh out of the house or seeking help for Josh or for the girls would have quickly revealed to the world that the Duggars also had clay feet. So he never would have done those things, risks of further harm to his clearly damaged son and daughters be damned. Maybe even more than the $200,000 he frittered away on the campaign instead of spending it on his needy kids, this action shows JimBob's true priorities pretty clearly, I think. Makes his willingness to sell his children's lives for tv cash look like just another manifestation of his true nature. 22 Link to comment
starfire May 23, 2015 Share May 23, 2015 (edited) HumblePi, on 23 May 2015 - 09:13 AM, said:HumblePi, on 23 May 2015 - 09:13 AM, said:HumblePi, on 23 May 2015 - 09:13 AM, said:State Police have jurisdiction throughout the entire state. Local police officers have jurisdiction within their own town. Unfortunately, or fortunately, depending on what side of the uniform you're standing, the State Trooper only gave Josh a 'stern warning' and didn't follow through on charges. But of course that's understandable since he was later arrested and convicted for child pornography and sentenced to 60 years in an Arkansas State prison. In the police report, JB and Michelle claimed they did not know the trooper well, but I really wonder about that. It doesn't sound like JB really wanted the police involved, and later (after Oprah reported it) wouldn't let Josh make a statement about what he done. JB also attempted to hire at least 2 defense attorneys for Josh who both declined to represent him. It really makes me wonder if JimBob (or one of his close church elders) knew this trooper was a pedophile and would not do anything about it (because they had info to hold over his head and/or because others involved in this could be pedophiles too)....and that later if Josh's molestations came to light, JimBob and Michelle could say "we brought him to a police officer" as sort of a defense that they did all they could and even involved the police. Like they planned it out, of course not knowing the trooper would later be busted (twice) for his crimes and end up in prison. It really creeps me out that the Duggars are connected to pedophiles and molesters like this trooper and Gothard, and it really makes me wonder what other skeletons are in the closet. Edited May 23, 2015 by starfire 17 Link to comment
CofCinci May 23, 2015 Share May 23, 2015 Anyone else wonder if the pedo state trooper offered to interview the victims as well -- and perhaps further traumatizing them? 3 Link to comment
Wellfleet May 23, 2015 Share May 23, 2015 (edited) You *know* Josh Duggar is sitting at home right now, super-eager to tell you how gay marriage in Ireland will be bad for children. If the show comes back viewers will never be able to look at this family the same. I mean what if Michelle talks about how mowing the lawn in your binkini is sinful. Viewers would say but your son molested 5 girls and they wear skirts that didn't prevent them from being molested. I agree but then I don't. At least the crew could make sure the kids aren't being beat with rods like some of the older girls were Agree. I just can't see how people will ever be able to watch this show again - even without Boob, Me-chelle or Josh - without experiencing bad/uncomfortable feelings. It makes me uneasy to think about it. I believe even the leg-humpers may get an odd taste in their mouths. Before this when things struck me as being off, I could always tell myself, "It's your imagination. It's because you don't like Boob & Me-chelle and their views. You don't know anything for sure. People deserve the benefit of the doubt." Etc etc. But now? There's no way to go back IMO. And personally I don't want to. Edited May 23, 2015 by Wellfleet 14 Link to comment
Recommended Posts