Kim Kardashian Thomas Humphries West

[ANEUMS]

http://twitter.com/DaneCook/status/532367124170174464/photo/1

Not sure if the link works I've never posted on here before. Saw this on Dane cooks twitter and lol'd and had to share.

His caption was "ohhhh right kim k. More like this before photoshop"

[Tunia]

My brother just said "the last time I saw an ass like that it had a tail attached and was walking around a stable"

 

You mean like this?

https://twitter.com/kelkulus/status/532407207586172928/photo/1

[Cocoa Puff]

Just read on TMZ that Kim didn't get paid for showing her ass this time, apparently she's been a like huge fan of the photographer that did the spread and did the photo shoot in Paris a few months ago. And now her and the photographer are besties forever! Bible.

http://m.tmz.com/#Article/2014/11/12/kim-kardashian-butt-paper-magazine-ass-not-paid

Edited November 12, 2014 by carolinagirl81

[GaT]

Just read on TMZ that Kim didn't get paid for showing her ass this time, apparently she's been a like huge fan of the photographer that did the spread and did the photo shoot in Paris a few months ago. And now her and the photographer and Kim are besties forever! Bible.

http://m.tmz.com/#Article/2014/11/12/kim-kardashian-butt-paper-magazine-ass-not-paid

Being able to show everyone her huge naked ass is all the payment Kim ever needs. Having it greased up too was just the icing on the cake.

[iwasish]

Just read on TMZ that Kim didn't get paid for showing her ass this time, apparently she's been a like huge fan of the photographer that did the spread and did the photo shoot in Paris a few months ago. And now her and the photographer and Kim are besties forever! Bible.

http://m.tmz.com/#Article/2014/11/12/kim-kardashian-butt-paper-magazine-ass-not-paid

She made plenty showing the beaver.

[peaceknit]

I think that Kim got excited about all the buzz regarding her mostly exposed and oiled up ass in a dental floss bikini shot she did in Thailand (remember that one?), and doubled down with this new pic. Anything to stay relevant is right.

Edited November 12, 2014 by peaceknit

[Quof]

I keep thinking they slathered the oil on her ass with a mop - you know, they kind they use to apply BBQ sauce to ribs.

[Maysie]

Well, hats off to her because she does own the internet for the day, though I wouldn't exactly call it "breaking the internet." The magazine wins because now virtually everyone has heard of it -- how many of us knew or cared about Paper before today? -- and of course Kim wins because she's the trending story of the day again. And you can bet that some other magazine/website/what the hell ever is taking note and weighing the value of whoring themselves out with Kim in the interest of being the flavor of the day.

 

It doesn't matter that the images are so obviously photoshopped (because no one -- even Kim, I'm sure -- believes she naturally looks like that). It doesn't matter that she's getting slammed and mocked by people for the shot. All that matters is that she's got all the attention she seems to endlessly crave.

 

At some point, she's going to become a caricature of herself (I think she already is, but let's face it: she does have a fan base, somewhere). There will come a day when no one is going to buy what's she's selling. However, in the meantime, the internet is going to be her vehicle to relevancy, which means she's going to keep popping up like shit on your shoe whenever you least expect it and want it. Every time I wonder how she can outdo herself, she does and in the end, the only thing I can think is poor North. I say that because whenever Kim's shelf life finally comes to an end, North is going to be her vehicle for attention, much as Kim is for Kris.

 

I have seen the "how can she do this to her daughter"/"she's a mother" comments, and truthfully, those arguments don't move me too much. People have short memories and by the time North is a teenager, this will be a footnote in Kim's long list of "accomplishments." My main issue with it where North is concerned is that this illustrates that Kim will do anything to get noticed. She exploits herself constantly and I hate to consider the likelihood that she'd exploit her own child. But as someone upthread noted, the apple doesn't fall far from the tree. Otherwise, this is an eminently mockable photo. Like her ass, it has a life all its own.

[Maire]

Am I seeing things? Huffington Post has a pic of a full frontal nude of Kim from the Paper photo session. She agreed to this? I think she has really lost it. (can't link from my phone but could someone check to be sure I am not seeing things?)

[ms.o]

Papermag.com has released new pics. Very NSFW. Full frontal

[Jodio]

The full frontal nude pic of Kim perfectly encapsulates her only talent: being photographed buck-naked with her mouth hanging open.

[Kromm]

The full frontal nude pic of Kim perfectly encapsulates her only talent: being photographed buck-naked with her mouth hanging open.

The new frontal shot also shows that apparently she doesn't have a vulva.

 

Clearly they must WANT us to know it's photoshopped.  That's a new kind of P.R.--deliberately stirring the "it's photoshopped" debates to get people screaming.

[GaT]

The new frontal shot also shows that apparently she doesn't have a vulva.

 

 

 

She probably had it removed because Kanye didn't think it was classy.

[howmanywords]

You know what I find really sickening about the new pictures? Even when she did Playboy there was one thing she wouldnt show.  Now even thats up for grabs.  Stay classy Kim! And yes I stand by my belief that she's a famewhoring pig and I feel bad for her child and the crap she'll look back on.

[iwasish]

She doesn't have a vulva in that pic because she only shows the beaver for money and this shoot was free .

The sad thing is that Kanye is spouting about how he's exposing North to all kinds of high faluting music and artists and creating an environment where she can express her artistic and creative genius and her mom is posing with her ass in the air like a cat in heat and extolling her talent.., that consists of balancing a glass on that same ass.

Edited November 13, 2014 by iwasish

[suomi]

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/11/12/kim-kardashian-naked-paper_n_6149192.html

[Kromm]

You know what I find really sickening about the new pictures? Even when she did Playboy there was one thing she wouldnt show. 

She STILL isn't showing it! Because it's CGIed over, so she's like Barbie there.  Only half as tall (in proportion), brunette, and with an ass the size of Cleveland.

[heebiejeebie]

Somewhere someone is telling the donkey "any day now".

[ramble]

Well I'd say I'm shocked but it'd be a lie. Geez woman there's is nothing wrong with keeping your private bits private. I bet she is so self involved she thinks everyone wishes they could spread it publicly.

Eventually, when she starts to fall out of the public eye, I can envision increasingly desperate attempts to capture any glory she can including straight up porn. Just picture a grey haired Kanye in his worn & aged leather pants trying to figure out how to light that ass in a way that doesn't make it look like jello in a ziplock bag while some unfortunate loser tries to hoist it up as he does her on a sink.

Seriously, does anyone find that dump trunk of an ass attractive? To me if looks like a disorderd growth condition more than anything.

[Cocoa Puff]

Her breasts were kinda pale compared to the rest of her. More spray tan Kim! Also just walk around in a g string and pasties if every other day your doing some "artistic" nude photo shoots for magazines

Edited November 13, 2014 by carolinagirl81

[Artsda]

This is who Vogue put on their cover, good job Anna,

 

This is pretty trashy. Kim's only got one thing going for her and proves why she's not respected. 

[tvallthetime]

Wow. Her naked everything is all out on the internet for everyone to see - and not even for a fee. I feel like this is lower than low.

[Artsda]

Kim really thought this would be a good idea? 

[GaT]

I just saw this on Reddit, LMAO
http://i.imgur.com/41D5ffv.jpg

[iwasish]

Has any of her family twittered about this? Usually they're all proclaiming how "gorge" she is' and how proud they are.

[goofygirl]

I think Kimye started gettin jealous that the younger Jenner girls were getting some attention and she wanted the focus back on HER.  And as my dear old FIL used to say, "That ass is as big as the Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex."  SOOO TRUE!

[DollEyes]

Ugh! Just when it seems like Kim can't get any worse, she does, because of Paper. Kim's posing with a champagne glass on her ass was bad enough, but actually baring it on the other cover is even trashier than that. Kim's excuse for doing it-because she wanted to prove that moms in general and her in particular can still be sexy-was even lamer than she is. There are plenty of famous and beautiful moms who've shown their sex appeal without showing their private parts on magazine covers. Case in point: Angelina Jolie on the cover of the new issue of Vanity Fair. Angelina looks beautiful, elegant and effortless both on the cover and in the photo spread without even trying; otoh, Kim's trying way too hard, as usual. Angelina may have done some nudity back in the day, especially for Gia, but she was not only playing characters, she won a Golden Globe and an Emmy for Gia, plus she won an Oscar for Girl, Interrupted and might at least be nominated for another for Best Director, if the early buzz for Unbroken is any indication. My point is that unlike Kim, Angelina has used/uses her sexiness as a tool, not a crutch. Angelina doesn't need nudity to stay relevant-again, unlike Kim. Sex is just one weapon in Angelina's arsenal, not the whole thing, ala Kim.

 

   Of course, once again, my heart goes out to North. Peoples' memories may be temporary, but the internet is forever. Kim has said/done/exposed way more than enough to embarrass her kids for the rest of their lives since before they were born and more shit like this will make things even worse. Kim may get attention for this-which, to put it mildly, she doesn't need- but like I always say, "Attention isn't respect."

Edited November 14, 2014 by DollEyes

[Darknight]

I guess Kim needed attention. Sad that she's a mother to a daughter that might see this one day

Edited November 13, 2014 by Darknight

[redlaces]

Ugh! If I find something Dane Cook does funny, there is a problem. I don't watch the show because I just can't deal with their nasal tone and pretentious attitudes. Bitches are laughing all the way to the bank though. 

[Crucial]

Ugh! If I find something Dane Cook does funny, there is a problem. 

 

That was my thought too but it was so funny.  My heart goes out to North as well but that little girl isn't going to see anything wrong with what her mother did because she is going to be so programmed to believe her mom (and dad) are the most intelligent, creative, and overall best of everything.  North will be brought up to believe that this is just the most special thing mommie did.  With the two ego driven parents she has, it will be drilled how great mommie and daddy are.

 

Kim, nothing she does is surprising anymore.  I know the shot is of her dress but oh how funny it is that it looks like a garbage bag.  I like to think that was done on purpose as an inside joke.  And I thought the original pic of the glass on the behind was better done than Kim.

[parisprincess]

There had to be a lot of photoshopping going on in those pictures.  With an ass that big, her waist is in no way as small as it looks in the one picture. Also, she has the longest ass crack I've ever seen; it extends almost up to her waist.  She is so pathetic in her need for attention.

[iwasish]

There had to be a lot of photoshopping going on in those pictures.  With an ass that big, her waist is in no way as small as it looks in the one picture. Also, she has the longest ass crack I've ever seen; it extends almost up to her waist.  She is so pathetic in her need for attention.

Her waist isn't that small EVER. The magazine has pretty much admitted the pics are heavily photo shopped.  For someone who is so anxious to be taken seriously, she continues to make a joke out of herself. Why should North make any effort to be a creative genius or an entrepreneur when her mom just oils herself up and lets the public have a clear view of her in all her hairless glory?

[SmallTownMom]

This trashy, pathetic attempt at gaining a little attention made me laugh.  Ignorant low-life.

 

Does anybody remember the Saturday Night Live shows from years ago where they had the family with the huge butts?  I think maybe it was back in the days with Jane Curtin.  That's who Kim reminds me of.  Only that was funny.  I wish Kim would go away and take her husband and Mom with her.

[Maysie]

 

For someone who is so anxious to be taken seriously, she continues to make a joke out of herself.

 

Yeah, this is kind of the mystery to me, but I guess Kim really is that stupid. Serious question: has she said she'd like to move beyond her sex tape? Because if she has, then I don't know, accepting money to be some old man's date (while you're engaged) and nude photo spreads don't really do much to help you move beyond your sex tape image.

 

I saw something on Instagram yesterday -- it was a split screen with Beyonce and Kim's Paper cover and it said something like "why Bey won't ever let Blue have a play date with North," or something to that effect. Every time Kim does something like this, there's a lot of talk about the artistic quality/value to the shoot (such as that very strange one she did when she was pregnant) because that makes it less trashy in their minds. But if she really wants to elevate herself, she needs to keep her clothes on and not dress like she's actively trying to be a MILF. Maybe I'm off, but instead of "artistic value" I see "desperate need for attention" whenever she does this stuff.

 

I think her need for attention overwhelms her desire to be taken seriously and to be "respectable." And if that's what she wants, then fine, but don't whine when people don't take you seriously. Maybe it's like DollEyes said upthread, that she can't tell the difference between "attention" and "respect."

[monakane]

As an art piece, the pictures are fantastic. I'm in love with the kewpie doll-sumo vibe of the styling.

 

I can't stand the Kardashians and have never watched their show, but I like the pictures.  I think they are artistic.  Kudos to the photographer.

[merylinkid]

 

I saw something on Instagram yesterday -- it was a split screen with Beyonce and Kim's Paper cover and it said something like "why Bey won't ever let Blue have a play date with North," or something to that effect.

 

I was just thinking about this very thing.   Kanye and Kim are always comparing themselves to Beyonce and Jay-Z or Prince William and Duchess Kate.   By comparison, I mean in the same league.   Yet you never see Beyonce posing naked with her oiled up ass hanging out for all to see.   Yes, I think Beyonce has done nudes, but there is a definite difference there.   Same with Duchess Kate, although with how many times her skirts have "accidently" blown  up showing her ass, I have to wonder.   Because she never seems to wear something made out of heavier fabric to keep it from happening.  But still not the same as posing with a glass on your ass -- then going full frontal naked on purpose.

 

You want to be taken seriously?   You want to be considered a creative genius that everyone looks up to and wants to be like?   Keep your damn clothes on.

[heebiejeebie]

There had to be a lot of photoshopping going on in those pictures.  With an ass that big, her waist is in no way as small as it looks in the one picture. Also, she has the longest ass crack I've ever seen; it extends almost up to her waist.  She is so pathetic in her need for attention.

 

 

Actually I agree with the first two points.  But on the third, the pic I saw (I'm quite proud I actually knew nothing about it the day it "broke" the internet despite being on the supposedly broken internet in my usual "too much" fashion until I watched @midnight -- I also saw the pic on a site I go to every day and so didn't even have to add to the search engine validation -- so there you tawdy attention slut),,,I have to disagree.  Her crack actually looks to be too short for the sloping of her ass.  I know this because as stereotypical as it is, I had a road crew outside my house all summer and had new plumping put in.   I am a crack expert.  No matter how full the ass, the crack doesn't stay the same size but it still starts at the same place.  You do not push the ass out and cause the crack to start what looks like six inches from the base of her spine.  You can't naturally make the body do that. 

 

What is funny about the photoshopping is that there is a clear moment where the two highlights of reflection on her "haunches" don't line up.  I wonder if the magazine actually used her for attention but did so in a way that they can then claim was a slam against her.  Her shoulder blades are all kinds of not occurring in nature wonky as well.  I wonder how much sag shit they had to shave off or if it will turn out they just cobbled together a couple of acceptable torsos to her ass. Because even if she took the time to pull her head out of her ass and stand up straight, there is no way her head and ass are that far apart without the help of an serial killer and his axe.

Edited November 13, 2014 by heebiejeebie

[Maysie]

 

You want to be taken seriously?   You want to be considered a creative genius that everyone looks up to and wants to be like?   Keep your damn clothes on.

 

Or be more discriminate when you take them off.

[Joe Jitsu913]

This trashy, pathetic attempt at gaining a little attention made me laugh. Ignorant low-life.

Does anybody remember the Saturday Night Live shows from years ago where they had the family with the huge butts? I think maybe it was back in the days with Jane Curtin. That's who Kim reminds me of. Only that was funny. I wish Kim would go away and take her husband and Mom with her.

The Buttmans? That was on In Living Color and they had huge asses in place of a forehead.

[iwasish]

SNL had the 'Widette' family

[howmanywords]

What should be a shock to no one, Radar is reporting Kris was behind the trashy shoot and Kanye was in the room when she posed.  This is the hilarious part though, we can add liar and hypocrite to the other names shes being called right about now:

 

In a January 2011 episode of Keeping up with the Kardashians, the reality star said she regretted posing nude for a shoot with W magazine.
“I feel so taken advantage of… I’ve definitely learned my lesson,” she told the cameras. “I’m never taking my clothes off again, even if it’s for Vogue.”

[GaT]

The internet is having much fun with naked Kim

[Magog]

 

I really honestly feel she did this because she wanted to be in headlines. She wanted to quote unquote shock people. One thing the kardashions are good at is getting publicity for themselves and when they want to be talked about, by golly they will find a way to be talked about. And she did.

 

After reading that, it is making me shudder to think 10 yrs from now, what Kim will try to do to stay relevant when she becomes middle-aged, nobody is checking for her (that part can't come soon enough), & her body isn't as "sexy" as it used to be. I can't imagine how Joel McHale feels about this. He is the only reason to put up with their crap.

 

Poor North needs a hug & some major therapy. She would of been better off being raised by wolves than those 2 idiots called her parents. 

 

Just seeing her photos on Paper Magazine made me nauseous. There is nothing sexy, classy, or tasteful about it. And who in the hell is Paper Magazine anyway? I've haven't heard of them till this horrible photo suit & thanks to that, I will never ever read or buy their crappy magazine. They must be desperate or have no standards if they need Kim Kardashian & her ilk to be relevant.

Edited November 14, 2014 by Magog

[GaT]

After reading that, it is making me shudder to think 10 yrs from now, what Kim will try to do to stay relevant when she becomes middle-aged, nobody is checking for her (that part can't come soon enough), & her body isn't as "sexy" as it used to be. 

 

 

 

 

Do you remember Kris & her wet photoshoot? That's just Kim waiting to happen

[howmanywords]

Just seeing her photos on Paper Magazine made me nauseous. There is nothing sexy, classy, or tasteful about it. And who in the hell is Paper Magazine anyway? I've haven't heard of them till this horrible photo suit & thanks to that, I will never ever read or buy their crappy magazine. They must be desperate or have no standards if they need Kim Kardashian & her ilk to be relevant.

Paper is a New York based magazine.  I have bought it a lot, in fact right up until 3 months ago I bought it.  They have put some well known, very famous people on the cover and have provided some excellent interviews as a result.  This is why I'm pretty stunned they are the ones who went this route.  After this I'll never give them another cent even if someone I like is on the cover.

[parisprincess]

Based on the photos, I'm guessing Kim is no longer concerned with being taken seriously.  At least she looks genuinely happy, as she doesn't have her usual "fuck me" face going on.  Reminds me of a toddler who wiggles out of their diaper and then runs gleefully through the house buck naked.

Edited November 14, 2014 by parisprincess

[Bossa Nova]

Of all the comments I 've been reading around the internet, no one seems to mention or notice the symbolism of the exploding champagne bottle with its white... foamy... liquid... exploding on her ass. 

 

Real classy there, Kim. 

Edited November 14, 2014 by Bossa Nova

[iwasish]

Of all the comments I 've been reading around the internet, no one seems to mention or notice the symbolism of the exploding champagne bottle with its white... foamy... liquid... exploding on her ass. 

 

Real classy there, Kim. 

If it had exploded into her face, they may have.

 

In the exploding  bottle shot, she looks like the Grinch, top knot and goofy grin and all.

Edited November 14, 2014 by iwasish

[Cocoa Puff]

Of all the comments I 've been reading around the internet, no one seems to mention or notice the symbolism of the exploding champagne bottle with its white... foamy... liquid... exploding on her ass.

Real classy there, Kim.

Aiesha Tyler mentioned it on the talk the other day.

[Bossa Nova]

If it had exploded into her face, they may have.

Tee hee ! ;)

 

In the exploding  bottle shot, she looks like the Grinch, top knot and goofy grin and all.

Someone upthread mentioned how that Kim's photo shoot was staged to imitate an old fashioned kew pie doll. I think so too.

 

For those of you not old enough to remember, ....I recall growing up (somewhere in he 1960's)  a kew pie doll that some friends had. These dolls actually came from the 1940's, I think. That said, the female dolls were made of rubber, with the same top-of-head pony tail that Kim's is wearing. Moreover, the dolls had on strapless dresses, and when you squeezed the doll's stomach, the dress fell down, to reveal its bare ass and the naked boobs popping out all like a secret naughty surprise. So this is what the great photographer was going for with Kim's photo staging, hair, dress, the strategic nudity and her surprised expression.

 

I looked for a picture of an an old kewpie doll online to post here but could not find one. 

Edited November 14, 2014 by Bossa Nova