Jump to content

Type keyword(s) to search

Kim Kardashian Thomas Humphries West


  • Reply
  • Start Topic

Recommended Posts

 

Of all the comments I 've been reading around the internet, no one seems to mention or notice the symbolism of the exploding champagne bottle with its white... foamy... liquid... exploding on her ass.

 

Yeah, it's very obvious, which is in keeping with the whole bunch of them. Subtlety is not their strong suit.

  • Love 3
Link to comment

Tee hee ! ;)

 

Someone upthread mentioned how that Kim's photo shoot was staged to imitate an old fashioned kew pie doll. I think so too.

 

For those of you not old enough to remember, ....I recall growing up (somewhere in he 1960's)  a kew pie doll that some friends had. These dolls actually came from the 1940's, I think. That said, the female dolls were made of rubber, with the same top-of-head pony tail that Kim's is wearing. Moreover, the dolls had on strapless dresses, and when you squeezed the doll's stomach, the dress fell down, to reveal its bare ass and the naked boobs popping out all like a secret naughty surprise. So this is what the great photographer was going for with Kim's photo staging, hair, dress, the strategic nudity and her surprised expression.

 

I looked for a picture of an an old kewpie doll online to post here but could not find one. 

Here you go: http://www.dollkind.com/kewpie-doll.shtml

Link to comment

Based on the photos, I'm guessing Kim is no longer concerned with being taken seriously.  At least she looks genuinely happy, as she doesn't have her usual "fuck me" face going on.  Reminds me of a toddler who wiggles out of their diaper and then runs gleefully through the house buck naked.

 

Her face is actually what I really looked at first. She does look happy and dare I say pretty in the face for a change. 

  • Love 1
Link to comment

According to some her fans, Kim is the icon of her generation. She's next Elizabeth Taylor, the new Madonna, and a modern day Marilyn Monroe to them. Kim is light years away from being on the level of any of those women.

  • Love 6
Link to comment

According to some her fans, Kim is the icon of her generation. She's next Elizabeth Taylor, the new Madonna, and a modern day Marilyn Monroe to them. Kim is light years away from being on the level of any of those women.

If by "fans" you mean Kanye, pretty much yeah.

  • Love 7
Link to comment

All you have to look at any of Kim's social media accounts to see she has a bunch of fans who idolize her and will defend her endlessly. The other day TMZ had footage of her leaving Kanyes apt in NYC and there were swarms of people mobbed outside shouting their love to her. I can roll my eyes and shrug it off but my issue is with young people who put her on a pedestal and see her as an icon of the future. God help our teens today when they are tweeting someone like Kim saying "you're my inspiration!". If I had a kid who inspired to be her I would lock her up heh.

  • Love 7
Link to comment

If by "fans" you mean Kanye, pretty much yeah.

She has fans. I could post a link to a thread that's comparing her to Marilyn Monroe. They basically said Marilyn would've been torned apart by the social media if it had existed when she was alive.

What Kim fans love to do is bring up all of the mutiple marriages, affairs, drug use, plastic surgeries, etc of icons like Liz Taylor, Madonna, and Marilyn did and say that they're no better than Kim. What they neglected to mentioned is that these women were A-List actresses, and entertainers and was/is taken seriously in their field.

Lorde wishes Kim was her mom

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2835043/I-wish-Kim-Kardashian-mom-Lorde-clarifies-cryptic-Twitter-comment-taken-slam-against-nude-magazine-shoot.html

Naya Rivera say's you're someones mother.

http://pagesix.com/2014/11/12/naya-rivera-slams-kim-youre-someones-mother/

Edited by Bucwild
  • Love 1
Link to comment

What Kim fans love to do is bring up all of the mutiple marriages, affairs, drug use, plastic surgeries, etc of icons like Liz Taylor, Madonna, and Marilyn did and say that they're no better than Kim. What they neglected to mentioned is that these women were A-List actresses, and entertainers and was/is taken seriously in their field.

 

I agree.  That's the most frustrating part of it all. 

 

I don't understand how anyone can say she should be considered in the same league as these ladies.  She can't act nor sing.  Her talent is taking selfies of herself and adjusting them to make her look good. I honestly don't see what she has done (besides the selfie crap) to even be mentioned with these ladies.  What? She shows her boobs and behind?  Oh and she takes pictures of herself to share with the world. Her mom created Kim and the whole fascination of this stuff. 

  • Love 6
Link to comment

She STILL isn't showing it! Because it's CGIed over, so she's like Barbie there.  Only half as tall (in proportion), brunette, and with an ass the size of Cleveland.

And a buttcrack the distance from Jacksonville to Miami.   Seriously, we now know where the flight that disappeared over the Everglades in the '90's and Jimmy Hoffa are hiding out now. 

Has any of her family twittered about this? Usually they're all proclaiming how "gorge" she is' and how proud they are.

The only "gorge" is between her butt cheeks.    If she sat on the internet, or farted on it, it would indeed break.   Imagine the torque and toots that thing could create. 

  • Love 11
Link to comment

She has fans. I could post a link to a thread that's comparing her to Marilyn Monroe. They basically said Marilyn would've been torned apart by the social media if it had existed when she was alive.

 

Unfortunately, they're right. By today's standards Marilyn Monroe would be considered a fat actress & she would have been ripped apart every time she appeared somewhere.

Link to comment

If MM conducted herself the way  Kim does, yes, she would be ripped apart.   Otherwise?   No more than anyone else famous, IMO.

 

By the way, Marilyn was I believe a size 8.    A size 8 back in the fifties and sixties was quite a bit smaller than today's vanity size 8.   A 5'5 woman in a size 8 today is in actuality if you use classic sizing no bigger than a 4. 

 

Kim's just a no talent.   A more apt comparison would be Pamela Anderson.   

Edited by Mu Shu
  • Love 4
Link to comment

If MM conducted herself the way  Kim does, yes, she would be ripped apart.   Otherwise?   No more than anyone else famous, IMO.

 

By the way, Marilyn was I believe a size 8.    A size 8 back in the fifties and sixties was quite a bit smaller than today's vanity size 8.   A 5'5 woman in a size 8 today is in actuality if you use classic sizing no bigger than a 4. 

 

Kim's just a no talent.   A more apt comparison would be Pamela Anderson.

Marilyn worked hard to shed her bimbo image and be taken seriously as an actress. She took acting classes and worked at her craft. She may not have been completely successful, but she tried to be more than tits and ass. The only thing Kim sheds is her clothing. A few years ago she was all about being serious about her fashion career and acting and was no longer going to be naked. What happened?

  • Love 12
Link to comment

What happened?

 

She can't act and she can't design clothes.   She has no skills whatsoever.   

 

It amazes me that people pay this woman to show at events.   And do what?   Stand there and stare while showing off her tits & ass.   Not much of a draw.   I am still trying to figure out how said people think having her show up will help their business.

  • Love 10
Link to comment

It amazes me that people pay this woman to show at events.   And do what?   Stand there and stare while showing off her tits & ass.   

I wish she had kept it confined to just her tits & ass, I could have lived a long, happy life without seeing Kim's cooch.

  • Love 3
Link to comment

Kim is known because of her body. She has no actual talent. If she was ugly, or didn’t have a sex tape, she’d be nothing. What kind of example is she setting for Nori? Use your body for fame, with someone you barely know, and do not love?  Kim should leave the spotlight and focus on being the best mom that she can be. She said that she didn’t want to do the show after becoming a mom, but I don’t see her in any rush to leave. Kanye is a control freak. What do they see in each other? Besides meal tickets.

  • Love 2
Link to comment

If MM conducted herself the way  Kim does, yes, she would be ripped apart.   Otherwise?   No more than anyone else famous, IMO.

 

By the way, Marilyn was I believe a size 8.    A size 8 back in the fifties and sixties was quite a bit smaller than today's vanity size 8.   A 5'5 woman in a size 8 today is in actuality if you use classic sizing no bigger than a 4. 

 

Kim's just a no talent.   A more apt comparison would be Pamela Anderson.   

 

Marilyn was actually a size 12, which was considered a standard dress size for the average American at that time.  I even recall an episode of I Love Lucy, where Lucy took extreme measures to lose weight so that she could fit into a size-12 stage costume.  A size 12 now is considered large by the fashion industry, and a woman that size is considered Rubenesque. 

 

Not only does Kim lack talent (beyond giving a "please fuck me!" look in photos), she has repeatedly shown she will do anything for a dick, a smile and some attention.  It's very telling that when she is seated next to her egocentric husband, Jay-Z, and Beyawnce that three of those people have multiple awards because of their talent.  Meanwhile, there is thirsty Kim sitting there with nothing but a homemade sex tape as her claim to fame.

 

I've yet to understand why Kim and the rest of her parasitic clan are rewarded with magazine covers and endorsements with prestigious brands.  Estee Lauder is apparently "thrilled and excited" to have one of the Jenner girls as its new face.  I'm sure the company's founder is rolling over in her grave given that the company's brand brand is synonymous with class and sophistication.  Then the Kartrashian/Jennifer clan post congratulatory messages on social media, boasting about their "hard work" paying off.  Bitches need to go somewhere and take a stadium full of seats.

  • Love 6
Link to comment

What happened?

 

She can't act and she can't design clothes.   She has no skills whatsoever.   

 

It amazes me that people pay this woman to show at events.   And do what?   Stand there and stare while showing off her tits & ass.   Not much of a draw.   I am still trying to figure out how said people think having her show up will help their business.

Because it does.

The confusion is because on a moral level it's hard to accept that fame can function as it's own engine. Kim doesn't have to actually DO anything to help a business, because being as famous as she is, the press follows her wherever she goes and reports on it. So a photo of Kim showing up at your club, or your event, means free press. This has nothing to do with any skill Kim has. She's just the middleman in this deal.

It's largely what the entire business of Reality TV stardom is based upon (with the exceptions of the ones from skill-based competition shows). Although to be fair it existed before Reality TV for socialite figures who did the same thing (albeit on a lesser scale).

  • Love 2
Link to comment

TBH, social media has played a large part of this instant stardom thing. It just seems unnatural to me, sort of like online dating. I'm at the point of never watching another "reality" show again. Refuse to support famewhores!

  • Love 5
Link to comment

How sad and pathetic of a woman she is that she has to strip down naked to show others she lost weight after her pregnancy. Big fucking deal. Lots of woman do that every day and yet manage to keep their dignity by not posing nude.

Kanye just needed another piece of porn to jerk off to, that's why he convinced his insecure wife to do this for him.

  • Love 3
Link to comment

If MM conducted herself the way  Kim does, yes, she would be ripped apart.   Otherwise?   No more than anyone else famous, IMO.

 

By the way, Marilyn was I believe a size 8.    A size 8 back in the fifties and sixties was quite a bit smaller than today's vanity size 8.   A 5'5 woman in a size 8 today is in actuality if you use classic sizing no bigger than a 4. 

 

Kim's just a no talent.   A more apt comparison would be Pamela Anderson.   

I was going to say the same thing. A friend of mine went to a museum where they had several of Monroe's dresses on display and she was shocked by how tiny they were. When we think of an 8 or 10 we picture it in today's vanity sizing terms, not how sizing was done fifty years ago. My friend said the dresses looked no bigger than a 4 (by today's model) at most.

  • Love 3
Link to comment

How sad and pathetic of a woman she is that she has to strip down naked to show others she lost weight after her pregnancy. Big fucking deal. Lots of woman do that every day and yet manage to keep their dignity by not posing nude.

Kanye just needed another piece of porn to jerk off to, that's why he convinced his insecure wife to do this for him.

Kim commented during her pregnancy that "as soon as I push this thing out, I'm gonna do Playboy or some other nude shoot".

  • Love 1
Link to comment

I couldn't find the forum for the new Hamptons spin-off so I'll comment here. Please forgive me if I'm breaking the rules.

I watched a little of the show last night. First off, Kim looked fat and her and Khloe's ass is GINORMOUS! OMG! What kind of moron intentionally makes their ass look like that?!?! I feel sorry for Scott. He's gonna die if he doesn't get help. Kourtney's voice is almost unbearable. Penelope is a DOLL! Okay, that's all.

Kim commented during her pregnancy that "as soon as I push this thing out, I'm gonna do Playboy or some other nude shoot".

This "thing"? She doesn't need anymore kids. She obviously doesn't give a flying fuck about the one she's got if she refers to her as a "thing". SMDH

  • Love 1
Link to comment

The other day I mentioned about how Kim has her share of defenders but omg I'm floored now.  I was looking at picture of Solange Knowles wedding and in the comments of one of the articles someone pointed out how Blue Ivy is always being carried around and never seems to be allowed to walk, that she's 2 1/2 years old and its just not normal. Cue Kim defenders pointing out how shes a GREAT mother since she allows North to walk and is always holding her hand. Um yeah speechless. Granted I SORT of agree about little Blue . Sometimes with things like parents can be overprotective and in turn use bad judgement. But a great mother is the last thing I would call Kim. That poor kid always looks petrified to be near her. I'd make a huge bet Jay and Bey give their daughter a lot more love and dont treat her as an accessory.

  • Love 2
Link to comment

I couldn't find the forum for the new Hamptons spin-off so I'll comment here. 

 

The forum for the Hamptons spin-off is here. If you look at the top of the page of the KUWTK forum you'll see "Past Seasons and Spin Offs" and then under that you'll see Hamptons

Link to comment

I saw the complaint once about how the Jolie-Pitt kids always seemed to be carried long after they should be walking.   I heard one explanation that made a lot of sense:  when dealing with crowds -- that include papparazzi it is actually safer and easier to carry the kid.   You know where the kid is, right in your arms.   The kid is not slipping from your hand and bolting.    I can bet that is what Jay-Z and Beyonce think too.   Blue Ivy probably walks everywhere when they are alone, but in public is carried.    North West on the other hand has to fend for her little safe because no way her mother is thinking about her needs.   She is just worried that carrying a kid will block the view of her cleavage.

  • Love 9
Link to comment

Just watched the Wendy Williams show, I like the "hot topics" part. And she was talking about how Ray J gets $50,000 a MONTH from the sex tape of him and Kim from back in 2007. Also she said that since Paper magazine pictures came out that the sales of the sex tape have gone up, to be the number one celebrity sex tape, knocking down the Pamela Anderson and Tommy Lee tape which held the title for years. So if Ray J is getting 50,000 allegedly a month I can only imagine what Kim is getting because you know PimpMomma Kris got her more than that.

Edit to add just saw this on TMZ, jeez I'd never have to work again with this kind of money.http://www.tmz.com/#Article/2014/11/18/ray-j-kim-kardashian-ass-photo-nude-butt-sex-tape-sales

Edited by carolinagirl81
Link to comment

IIRC, Kimmy did say those words on the show, on tape.

Indeed she did on an episode of KUWTK.  In fact her exact words were " as soon as I POP this thing out I want to pose nude again".  When the episode aired we were at TWOP and many of us were appalled she said that.

Edited by howmanywords
  • Love 2
Link to comment

It's hard to tell what's factual when it comes to why Kim is hated.  There are several things attributed to Kim that she never said or did, but people believe them -- for example, that she was on her phone during Common's Mike Brown tribute at the VMA's.  It was a flat out lie, but it was reported all over the news.  I like to hear and see things for myself before commenting.

Link to comment

I searched around and seems any clips of the scene have been pulled due to copyrights from E but there are numerous articles all over that quote it (the articles I found are from when a small clip previewing an upcoming season aired on E and they all quote what she said) This was big because of her admitting she wanted to pose nude again and wasnt made up but YMMV.  Here are 2 articles for example:

http://radaronline.com/exclusives/2013/09/kim-kardashian-playboy-after-having-baby/

A promo for KUWTK shows a still-pregnant Kim saying “As soon as I pop this thing out, I want to do Playboy or some nude shoot.

Read more: http://www.crushable.com/2013/09/03/entertainment/kim-kardashian-playboy-shoot-post-baby-body-reveal/#ixzz3JVFNB99N

 

  • Love 1
Link to comment

To be fair, if she didn't know the gender yet, it's not uncommon for pregnant women to call unborn babies "it".  So "this thing" is only a shade off of that and I think is usually far more about the pregnant belly than the actual contents of said belly (even if the language used doesn't quite express that properly).

  • Love 1
Link to comment

 

“I think if we just remain deeply tasteful and just put deeply tasteful people on the cover, it would be a rather boring magazine,” Wintour explained, according to Fashionista. “Nobody would talk about us. It’s very important that people do talk about us.

Anna Wintour has an interesting take on why she put Kimye on the Vogue cover.  I wonder how Kimye & Co will spin the implication that they are not "deeply tasteful"?

  • Love 4
Link to comment
There will come a day when no one is going to buy what's she's selling.

 

When? When?????  I need something to look forward to. Thought it might have happened around the time of Kim's wedding to the basketball player that lasted a few weeks but she weathered the storm by hooking up with Kayne and spawning. I am beginning to think that much like the mighty cockroach the Kardashians will still be here after a world ending comet hits earth, all the volcanoes explode and the ash blocks out the sun killing any remaining living plant and animal life, the oceans swell and cover all land, that family will be hanging from tree limbs or clinging to flotsam posing in positions trying to show off their plastic asses for cameras that aren't there. At this point, it saves my sanity to just resign myself to the fact that they aren't going anywhere anytime soon. 

 

I am so tired of this family 'winning!' What is worst is that they seem impervious to criticism and incapable of shame. It almost seems on occasion that they are courting ridicule and welcome it so long as it has them trending on twitter. 

 

Anna Wintour has an interesting take on why she put Kimye on the Vogue cover.  I wonder how Kimye & Co will spin the implication that they are not "deeply tasteful"?

This is quite the tune change. Before it was because they were culture definers and Kim had strength of character. Wonder if the Kimye Vogue issue wound up being not as successful as once touted and a blemish on the magazine. What I hated most about Kimye getting the cover is that I saw Anna as one of the last bastions, one of the last guardians making sure the barbarians were NOT allowed through the gates, giving them any hint of legitimacy. Anna not only threw open the gates, she rolled out the red carpet opening up the floodgates and allowing the Ks access to the refined air of the haute fashion world. I include Kendall in this, no matter how much she protests being a K helped her get where she is. No way she would've gotten an Estee contract otherwise. I don't care want anyone says.

 

Also, Vogue is supposed to set trends, not follow them.

 

They are like the Jaws of famewhore. Where as the great white swims, eats, shit and makes other little sharks the Ks dress up, set the make up gun to whore and post on IG and and trot out for events and pap walks (or in K speak stunt queen strut).

  • Love 12
Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...