Jump to content

Type keyword(s) to search

Josh & Anna Smuggar: A Series of Unfortunate Events


Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, crazy8s said:

AUSA asks “Can you tell me what you know about the allegations?” Reaver pauses, is silent, and then says “Give me a minute.” Story objects, judge overrules.

“I don’t fully know everything but from my understanding there was some, uh, when he was younger, I’m not sure how old, maybe a teenager, that there was inappropriate touching of some of the minors.”

Was not aware that one of the minors was 5-years-old

Um, isn't this what happened when he was a teenager? These aren't the charges he is currently facing. From stuff he did two years ago.

  • Love 4

My cousin is a Federal agent and my brother-in-law is a NYPD captain. They have guns, and that’s the extent of my knowledge of any firearms that have been in my vicinity.

I do understand  that in other regions of the country, legal guns are more common. Therefore I don’t know what to say about the Reavers having guns in a closet, but it certainly seems like if Josh spins out he can harm them or himself. Just lock him up, Judge. Please. 

  • Love 9

Do they still think Jesus can save him?

Do they feel sorry for those molested kids? They did not want to be involved in something like that. Even if they said the devil made someone to that to those kids, the kids are sill innocent

How can they justify it even with Gothard belief system 

18month old child. How?

  • Love 2
26 minutes ago, Arkay said:

I'm baffled by so much of this. How can one individual be savvy enough to divide internet stuff so that it’s hidden from someone who is supposed to be overseeing him, and yet use his birth year as a password? On not just his disgusting stuff but his bank accounts? 

 

Sadly, there are probably detailed instructions and even bootable cd-rom or usb key images to help set this kind of stuff up if you know what part of the internet underbelly to look in. 

I used to work in a part of IT that would automatically set up hard drives and applications.  It wasn't hard to create a bootable CD that you put in your machine and it re-partitioned things, installed the second OS, and installed/configured the needed software.  What I was doing was automating the manufacturing process so that when XYZ grocery stores bought new servers, they were pre-installed with their software/accounts/networking preferences/etc, but the same methodology could be used to provide a pre-packaged "set up my computer to do bad things" kit that wouldn't require the end user to actually understand much of the technology.

 

  • Useful 3
  • Love 5
2 minutes ago, Arkay said:

My cousin is a Federal agent and my brother-in-law is a NYPD captain. They have guns, and that’s the extent of my knowledge of any firearms that have been in my vicinity.

I do understand  that in other regions of the country, legal guns are more common. Therefore I don’t know what to say about the Reavers having guns in a closet, but it certainly seems like if Josh spins out he can harm them or himself. Just lock him up, Judge. Please. 

Most gun owners I know have a dedicated safe or lockbox. My concern is if reality sets in and Josh realizes he's about to do time, he might have some sort of mental break. It's probably not a good idea for him to be housed in close proximity to nine weapons. 

  • Useful 5
  • Love 18

This Mrs. Reavers doesn't seem to know what the fuck her husband agreed to do for JB. I feel bad for her, and I'm only getting the descriptions of what's going on. Is it possible she thinks porn itself is illegal or something and that's why they were there? Or am I giving her too much leeway? At least she's showing discomfort at the idea of having him at the house.

 

I'm really glad the judge is allowing his past to be brought up. This man has been doing shit since 2002, it's not reasonable to think he can be stopped by the people around him.

 

Where are these references to an 18 month old coming from? 

  • Love 10
Just now, BitterApple said:

Most gun owners I know have a dedicated safe or lockbox. My concern is if reality sets in and Josh realizes he's about to do time, he might have some sort of mental break. It's probably not a good idea for him to be housed in close proximity to nine weapons. 

that is what I was thinking. I could imagine some stand off with the wife a hostage. 

  • Love 4
Just now, BitterApple said:

Most gun owners I know have a dedicated safe or lockbox. My concern is if reality sets in and Josh realizes he's about to do time, he might have some sort of mental break. It's probably not a good idea for him to be housed in close proximity to nine weapons. 

You mean out of sight in a bedroom closet doesn't cut it?

  • LOL 7
  • Love 3
3 minutes ago, libgirl2 said:

that is what I was thinking. I could imagine some stand off with the wife a hostage. 

That was my first thought as well. I could see Josh going out by "suicide by cop" rather than spend years in prison as a pedophile. It sounds crazy, but you never know what a caged animal will do when cornered. 

  • Love 22
2 minutes ago, Gigi43 said:

I'm really glad the judge is allowing his past to be brought up. This man has been doing shit since 2002, it's not reasonable to think he can be stopped by the people around him.

 

Where are these references to an 18 month old coming from? 

If I wasn't so disturbed by some of the details I would have to giggle at why it is possible that his past can be brought up.   The cover up and then subsequent exposure and the decision by the family to explain it away publicly took away the protection Josh facing the music in juvenile court would have afforded him now.

So the original plan of action on his earliest predation means it can be used against him in his bid for bond, and his very diligent efforts to conceal his activities from authorities and those around him all will be significant factors against granting bail.   Father and son, foisted on their own petards.   

  • Love 18
(edited)

from the reddit recap =closing prosecution arguments it would seem the "family members" and the sleeze bag felon are not a possibility

"Timeline in Exhibits 3 and 4 demonstrate that Josh was the one using the computer in May to download CP and throughout the day texting his family and using the computer for other uses"

Edited by crazy8s
  • Useful 6
  • Love 5
(edited)
2 minutes ago, BitterApple said:

Some of the testimony is very graphic. Aside from the victims, I'm hoping at least one Duggar (aside from Jill) listened in. The family needs to know what a monster Josh really is, rather than form opinions based on Boob's sugar-spun version of events.

The reddit account says that there is a John on the zoom but no last name so maybe JD or not. Also Lauren S (using her maiden name)?   

 

Edited by auntieminem
  • Useful 9
1 minute ago, BitterApple said:

Aside from the victims, I'm hoping at least one Duggar (aside from Jill) listened in. The family needs to know what a monster Josh really is, rather than form opinions based on Boob's sugar-spun version of events.

Is there any indication JB and/or Michelle are listening in? If the details are graphic, maybe they need to hear them as well to fully appreciate what their son has done.

  • Love 11
1 minute ago, BitterApple said:

Some of the testimony is very graphic. Excluding the victims, I'm hoping at least one Duggar (not just Jill) listened in. The family needs to know what a monster Josh really is, rather than form opinions based on Boob's sugar-spun version of events.

That is why I am hoping it is JD. 

  • Love 10
2 minutes ago, BitterApple said:

Some of the testimony is very graphic. Aside from the victims, I'm hoping at least one Duggar (aside from Jill) listened in. The family needs to know what a monster Josh really is, rather than form opinions based on Boob's sugar-spun version of events.

If the Duggars won't or can't, I hope one of the spouses does. 

  • Love 12

How does Jim Bob continue to support this pervert and not just completely disown him? JB, YOU have some culpability here.  This is a prime example of why you address this type of behavior immediately. You don’t send the kid to dig ponds and talk to “the church”.  It’s so disgusting to think this is what came out of their big secret.

Rot in jail pervert.

  • Love 22
4 minutes ago, BitterApple said:

Some of the testimony is very graphic. Excluding the victims, I'm hoping at least one Duggar (not just Jill) listened in. The family needs to know what a monster Josh really is, rather than form opinions based on Boob's sugar-spun version of events.

Some of the siblings who didn't observe might also have the privilege of having everything explained to them in Michelle's breathy tones if they're lucky, or not. 

  • Love 2

The closing argument worries me:

"Not a danger to the community. If law enforcement thought that he was a danger they could’ve detained him back in 2019, but they didn’t."

For this bond hearing, the defense has to prove he's not a danger to the community and this point they made is striking to me.

Of course They also have to prove he's not a flight risk. That one I hope is harder. He did do a lot to conceal his activities - no reason he wouldn't do more to conceal his departure. 

  • Useful 3
  • Love 6
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...