Jump to content

Type keyword(s) to search

The Duggars: In the Media and TLC

Null 302

By Null 302
in Counting On

Guest

As a reminder, the site's Politics Policy remains in effect.  Yes, Jim Bob is apparently running for office again. That does not make it an acceptable topic of conversation in here - unless for some mysterious reason, TLC brings the show back and it is discussed on there. Even then, it would be limited to how it was discussed on the show.

If you have any questions, please PM the mods, @SCARLETT45 and myself.

  • Reply
  • Start Topic

Recommended Posts

Micks Picks

Micks Picks

Munichnark I am so glad you mentioned this.  I looked at the Counting on FB page and was amazed at all the unhappy leghumpers.  I'm so used to seeing only the groveling jumpers that I quit reading there.  And now the tables have turned.  Maybe it is justification for TLC to stop filming it.  Since they have so few sponsors and basically only advertise their own shows (which are equally as bad) they not only are not making any money but also with fewer viewers, are also not getting the advertising audience for their own shows.    I've noticed with shows that I have over the years that the last couple of years, they seems to fire the writers and what were good shows become garbage so even I don't care when they go away.  It's merciful.  Must be what TLC is aiming for.

  • Love 1
Link to comment
  • Replies 13k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

cmr2014
cmr2014

I was thinking about this and the idea that the girls weren't "harmed" and weren't "damaged goods" which led me to realize that ALL of the Duggar children are "damaged goods" and I think that's becomi

Churchhoney
Churchhoney

They put themselves on tv and have proclaimed over and over and over and over again that their way of life is the way to ensure that your children are totally safe from every evil of the world, and in

WhitneyWhit
WhitneyWhit

I don't know where to post this but I fucking met Michelle Duggar. Let me set the scene. So my cousin is getting married and we were at a shop looking at dresses here in Kentucky when the Duggars marc

Posted Images

Defrauder

Defrauder

What was that bullshit awhile back that either the Duggars or TLC put out about watch the next season and see some Duggar male(s) pursuing a new relationship?  I remember it because it had me thinking - they don't have any old relationships.  

As for Smuggar not having a phone, he probably makes Anna do all kinds of sexual things she doesn't want to do - because he can, and if she doesn't than he has an excuse (her fault) to use porn or to cheat and if he get's caught he can always blame Satan.   He's in a win/win, she's in a lose/lose.

  • Love 3
Link to comment
Churchhoney

Churchhoney

(edited)
17 hours ago, drafan said:

....except that he said that Anna was wearing jeans and a T-shirt. Wouldn't that be scandal enough??

Not sure I believe "him", or whoever it was. Could be good fan-fic.

For some reason, it sounded 100 percent phony to me. I guess it's partly because it was too dead-on to the posts on Duggar-horror-watch sites all over the Internet, even to using the same terms. And supposedly it was written by a hetero guy married to a fundie woman -- and the echoes of the Internet memes for the Duggs reallly didn't fit that, to me. Plus, that digression into his own supposed hot rock'n'roll courtship moment with his pre-fundie wife. That read completely like fiction to me. And maybe like fiction by some woman from one of the forums trying too hard to give the impression that she's a guy.

I guess when a story sounds just exactly what I'd expect, that seems to me to be a very big clue that it's made up. When you make something up and want it accepted, the main thing to do is to meet everybody's precise expectations.

Edited by Churchhoney
  • Love 7
Link to comment
Minivanessa

Minivanessa

Just one point. The author of the Reddit story did not say that Anna was wearing jeans and a t-shirt. He said Anna was wearing makeup (looked like she'd taken care to put herself together), while Josh was just in jeans and a t-shirt. Looking, as compared to his wife, sloppy. 

  • Love 1
Link to comment
Catlyn

Catlyn

(edited)
19 hours ago, drafan said:

except that he said that Anna was wearing jeans and a T-shirt. Wouldn't that be scandal enough??

It was Josh in jeans and a T-shirt. Anna was always made up and dressed nicely. He was comparing how they were dressed.

(Sorry, didn't realize many others said the same thing.)  

If the story is true, it's a shame the man and Anna didn't talk. Maybe both Anna and Josh would realize Anna is a pretty woman and desirable to other men. She doesn't have to settle. They both need to wake up.

Edited by Catlyn
I didn't read all the posts before I posted and was repeating what was said.
  • Love 1
Link to comment
Gweilo

Gweilo

If Reddit guy ends up posting anywhere else on the internet with more carefully drip fed 'info' about the Duggars, I'm going to call it as the return of RazingRuth/Wanderwoman.

I do love a good internet conspiracy!

  • Love 10
Link to comment
WhineandCheez

WhineandCheez

Quote

 

FAQ’s

Q. Can I Bring My Nursing Baby?

A. Yes! Children that are 18 months and younger are allowed at no additional cost. Please, no other children, we want you and your spouse to completely focus on the Lord and each other!

 

Pffftttt.  You better go there expecting hoards of kids, because what fundy woman doesn't always have a kid under 18 months!!

  • Love 2
Link to comment
Marigold

Marigold

I'm leaning towards not true.

I was thinking about it...he blames his wife's religious Fund change on homeschooling?  That sounds a little too obvious. I'm a homeschooler and I'm not feeling his statement. of course, I'm in the heathen North East but still...  Funds like the Duggars tend to keep to themselves and not mix with the evangelicals.  So where is his mainstream Christian homeschool wife meeting all these Funds? I've been to plenty of homeschool conferences and conventions.  It's heavily evangelical and not Fund.  Unless his wife is seeking them out? 

Eh, whatever, we will never know who or what this guy is but it was interesting....

  • Love 4
Link to comment
Arwen Evenstar

Arwen Evenstar

7 hours ago, Micks Picks said:

Before marriage, Anna's father made Josh promise that Anna would monitor his internet use.  Not that promises are worth anything to these dingbats, but that would put Anna in control of his internet cell phone use, or lack thereof.  However I'm sure her word isn't worth squat, so yes, Boob is in control.

I know Anna's dad made TFDW aware that he would be accountable to Prissy for his internet use.  Wasn't sure of any such thing with Josh and Anna, but I'm probably not remembering.

Mr E and I have been together for twelve years. I have never felt the need to go through his computer or smart phone, nor has he mine. As two worldly grown ass consenting adults, we're free to look at whatever we want, but we don't feel the need. We're much more into using the Internet for research.  Are only Duggars paranoid that anyone with an Internet connection and no accountability partner is going to be looking at porn 24/7? What is porn to them? A nude statue or painting?

  • Love 6
Link to comment
Marigold

Marigold

3 hours ago, Arwen Evenstar said:

What is porn to them? A nude statue or painting?

I think you should direct that question to Mr. Joshua Duggar and he will be able to give you a full report on that topic.  

He will even write a research  paper like Jill did, if you would prefer. I bet Josh knows how to annotate.  ;)

  • Love 5
Link to comment
Albanyguy

Albanyguy

8 hours ago, Arwen Evenstar said:

I know Anna's dad made TFDW aware that he would be accountable to Prissy for his internet use.  

An easy promise for David to make, since I doubt that Priscilla is computer-savvy enough to monitor his internet browsing in any meaningful way. 

  • Love 7
Link to comment
Missy Vixen

Missy Vixen

Just throwing this one out here for conversation: The "bloggers" of all things Duggars have posted some kind of appeal to get KJB and J-Chelle back on Counting On, according to Pickles. After all, "everyone" wants to see them. Since those women probably ask permission to visit the ladies' room, it's most likely being engineered by the Duggars. 

Didn't Nance assure everyone that KJB, J-Chelle and Joshley Madison were no longer appearing on any show involving the Duggars? Does she realize that there are still people who will be more than happy to pelt her and the few advertisers left with phone calls, letters, e-mails... 

I know I'm shocked. How about you?

  • Love 2
Link to comment
Sew Sumi

Sew Sumi

I believe that Nancy only guaranteed that Smuggly would not appear on the present season. Before that, she said that the focus would be on the kidults with Boobchelle having a very marginal role. No promises were made about Boobchelle's involvement this season, but one had to know they'd show up because fundie courtships can't happen without parents hanging all over them. 

I fully expect them to integrate Smuggly into Jinger's wedding, whenever they air it. After that? I'll sit back and watch the backlash on both TLC and Duggar social medla, specifically Duggar Fam since Mechelle sees some of it, although I think it's Jana who does all the banning. No use posting criticism to Jessa; she bans anyone who doesn't toe her party line. Jill? She doesn't read responses, so no use, really. 

The one person invested in the show who might get a jolt out of Smuggly backlash would be Ben, but outrage would have to be carefully couched in language he understands. 

  • Love 1
Link to comment
momofsquid

momofsquid

Are the humpers even interested in Boobchelle? To me it looks like most of their fanbase is young girls who fangirl over the female kidults, mixed in with a few conservative Christian adults who have enjoyed watching the girls grow up.  If TLC felt they must continue with this farce, they were on the right track focusing on the older girls. I predict any shift from that focus will cause backlash, lower ratings or both. And lately even a new courtship doesn't seem to be stirring up the level of interest that previous ones did so hopefully this whole thing is on the verge of implosion anyway. Of course Boob probably thinks his absence is the only thing keeping the ratings down.

  • Love 4
Link to comment
kokapetl

kokapetl

Whatever "x factor" the show now lacks, Josh wasn't bringing it. He will be at Jinger's wedding, but it's easy enough to shoot around him, and that's what they'll do. He's not worth the risk. I would be shocked if even his bald spot makes it onto our screens. They rarely let JimChelle look at the camera anymore. 

  • Love 2
Link to comment
Missy Vixen

Missy Vixen

4 hours ago, Kokapetl said:

They rarely let JimChelle look at the camera anymore. 

 

KJB will be giving his "Oscar Reel" performance of crocodile tears and allegedly solicitous, over the top wistfulness about losing another one of his "girls" when he walks Jinger up the aisle. I can't even with him. Seriously. Does he or his pharmaceutically-enhanced child bride (SNAPS to the poster who named her "Xanaxia") have any idea of the sheer repugnance any viewer has for both of them?

  • Love 6
Link to comment
Aja

Aja

2 minutes ago, Missy Vixen said:

KJB will be giving his "Oscar Reel" performance of crocodile tears and allegedly solicitous, over the top wistfulness about losing another one of his "girls" when he walks Jinger up the aisle. I can't even with him. Seriously. Does he or his pharmaceutically-enhanced child bride (SNAPS to the poster who named her "Xanaxia") have any idea of the sheer repugnance any viewer has for both of them?

I just have to second this. I don't know who it was, but that's been my preferred name for Michelle ever since. 

  • Love 5
Link to comment
lulu69

lulu69

3 hours ago, Missy Vixen said:

Does he or his pharmaceutically-enhanced child bride (SNAPS to the poster who named her "Xanaxia") have any idea of the sheer repugnance any viewer has for both of them?

Boob would tell you it's the vocal few who are messing with his 'new world order' vision and keeping him & Xanaxia from their God-given teevee empire. Everyone else, they just loooove the Duggars!

  • Love 1
Link to comment
louannems

louannems

Axanaxia!  Did you catch Michelle in the airport waiting for their flight to Dallas?  She had the Mostest crazed expression and was staring straight ahead.  She was most likely watching TV.  And I'm sure the TLC camaras told her to not look at the camera.

  • Love 1
Link to comment
Arwen Evenstar

Arwen Evenstar

11 hours ago, louannems said:

Axanaxia!  Did you catch Michelle in the airport waiting for their flight to Dallas?  She had the Mostest crazed expression and was staring straight ahead.  She was most likely watching TV.  And I'm sure the TLC camaras told her to not look at the camera.

Well it was because the stunned mullet had to get up 6 hours earlier than usual, and Starbucks wasn't open yet..

  • Love 5
Link to comment
Lady Edith

Lady Edith

Geeze.  I finally suffered through last week's "episode".  What the HELL was THAT?!?!?  It screamed "here we are, fundy ladies!!!"  It was like a REALLY bad dating video for a Christian dating site mixed with the vignettes done in the earlier days for the kids.  It was AWFUL!  I wound up fast forwarding through 90% of it and stopping only to watch the few bits there were of JinJer.  Good LORD that was BAD!  If I were one of the boys, I would've felt humiliated and used.  

That was a half hour of my life I will never get back.  

  • Love 9
Link to comment
Missy Vixen

Missy Vixen

:Clears throat: They're at some "religious freedom" conference in Branson, MO this weekend, according to Pickles. There's also photographic evidence.

One wonders if they will be taking the stage to lament about the terrible "vocal few" that have cost them a TV show, the vast majority of advertisers, and their cushy $40K per week job. They're persecuted for the LORD!

  • Love 2
Link to comment
kalamac

kalamac

Do they have a time frame for when all these horrible things caused by gay marriage are going to happen? Because it hasn't happened so far. All that's happened is people who love each other getting married.

  • Love 18
Link to comment
Xena

Xena

14 hours ago, kalamac said:

Do they have a time frame for when all these horrible things caused by gay marriage are going to happen? Because it hasn't happened so far. All that's happened is people who love each other getting married.

It's the same time frame when all the horrible things caused by legalizing marijuana in some states will happen.  Just look for that same date on your calendar.

  • Love 7
Link to comment
Arwen Evenstar

Arwen Evenstar

On October 8, 2016 at 6:22 PM, kalamac said:

Do they have a time frame for when all these horrible things caused by gay marriage are going to happen? Because it hasn't happened so far. All that's happened is people who love each other getting married.

Horrible things have already happened - violence towards the LGBT community from the rage and hatred fomented by the likes of these nut jobs.

  • Love 13
Link to comment
Sew Sumi

Sew Sumi

(edited)
5 hours ago, Arwen Evenstar said:

Horrible things have already happened - violence towards the LGBT community from the rage and hatred fomented by the likes of these nut jobs.

Hell, when Pulse was attacked by Islamic fundamentalist extremists (see what I did there?), I bet the Duggars and their ilk silently cheered, although the politicians like Daniel Webster (not even his district, although his is adjacent; Orlando is actually split in half) publicly said they were praying for the victims. I remember radio silence from the Duggars when that happened. That should surprise nobody here. 

Edited by Sew Sumi
Link to comment
StaceyNotStacie

StaceyNotStacie

I checked the episode descriptions on my dvr. The episode description for next week (10/25) mentions the family getting together to review season two and a surprise guest makes an appearance. I'm wondering if the guest will be Josh or if we'll get another courting announcement. 

Link to comment
Churchhoney

Churchhoney

(edited)

Grandpa? Emerged from the grave and now driving that office chair, with a few of his new undead buddies riding on the bumpers, with rocket launchers, and heading straight for JB.

Hey, it is almost Halloween.

 

Or maybe a Very Special Talking Head from Mr. Bynum? I think I vote for that one.

Edited by Churchhoney
  • Love 14
Link to comment
Arwen Evenstar

Arwen Evenstar

3 hours ago, laurakaye said:

Stacey and Clinton from "What Not to Wear - Extended Duggar Edition?"

Yes!!! I would so watch the stank face and side eye once Clinton and Stacey see the horrid mustard cardigan and fling it in the bin!! 

...and there was much rejoicing!

  • Love 3
Link to comment
jschoolgirl

jschoolgirl

21 hours ago, Stacey1014 said:

I checked the episode descriptions on my dvr. The episode description for next week (10/25) mentions the family getting together to review season two and a surprise guest makes an appearance. I'm wondering if the guest will be Josh or if we'll get another courting announcement. 

Cisco!

  • Love 9
Link to comment
Lady Edith

Lady Edith

4 hours ago, Churchhoney said:

Grandpa? Emerged from the grave and now driving that office chair, with a few of his new undead buddies riding on the bumpers, with rocket launchers, and heading straight for JB.

The Walking Duggars? 

  • Love 4
Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...