Jump to content

Type keyword(s) to search

Jill, Derick & the Kids: Moving On!!


Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, Snow Fairy said:

For all of Amy's issues, I can see where she is happy someone besides herself sees JB for the control freak that he is.  She has had a front row seat to the madness that is the Duggars for decades and now she at least has oen person who can comment with her.  A Statler to her Waldorf you could say.

  • Love 19
53 minutes ago, Teriyaki Terror said:

He use to be an accountant for Wal-Mart. Why can't he go back to that?

well that would be a question for Derick.

My guess is he doesn't want to work at walmart. 

It has been what 3 or 4 years since he worked there? He didn't work there all that long and it seems he was off filming the show a majority of the time he was employed there.

 

 

 

  • Useful 1
  • Love 3
9 hours ago, SMama said:

Boob never misses an opportunity to put down Deanna for having a child out of wedlock. Followed by how he and Mullet are so damn godly because they accept Deanna and Amy. The same way he trashed his late father. I’m sure Amy has had enough of Boob’s holier than thou bullshit. 

Has he said something publicly?  I don’t recall. 

Everything derick writes is word salad. 

  • Love 3
1 hour ago, floridamom said:

What the heck does Derick's statement even mean? If he has something to state publicly, he should just POST IT.

He can't. He's lied and exaggerated so many times, I'm not sure he knows the truth.

Plus, I'm guessing the truth will make him look greedy and a little stupid, nevermind expose his lies.

  • Love 13
17 minutes ago, flyingdi said:

I don't want to defend Jim Bob but I've never heard him say a word against Deanna or Amy other than to describe Amy as a "little wild".

I haven't either, but in reality JB doesn't do much talking at all. He'll say a sentence and pause and then Michelle jumps in and prattles on with Fundy platitudes. 

  • Love 13

Derick really does have passive aggression down to an art form. Bet he’s really fun to live with.

It is possible he’s dropping these crumbs as a subtle threat to JimBoob. Give us the money you earned by us “volunteering” or I blow down the whole deck of cards.

Unfortunately, as we seem to be in a post-truth era, it might not matter what he revealed.

  • Useful 1
  • Love 8
2 hours ago, Zella said:

You bring up a good point--I will enjoy watching JB's house of cards fall, but if Derick doesn't think his own finances are going to be scrutinized in the process, he's got another thing coming.

Personally, I think there is some truth in what Derick is saying about the situation with JB (particularly about the current estrangement), but his story has changed so many times, especially regarding "contracts"--and what he has said doesn't make sense--that I am wary of some of the claims he's making. Especially, as I have said before, how he always conveniently ignores he was FIRED by TLC.

It's been pointed out to me that Austin has also mentioned not being paid, so I am more willing to accept that claim than I was, but I agree with you that not being paid doesn't necessarily equal no material benefit at all. 

His story is fluid and ever-changing and yes, he totally ignores being fired by TLC.  I don't remember exactly how TLC explained it, but I think it was crystal clear and it was their decision to remove  D & J from the show.

Edited by Suzn
  • Useful 1
  • Love 12

So if I was a volunteer on a show, I think I would at least talk with the family and TLC when the new name of the show was going to include my wife's name.

Izzy was born prior to the name change. The Dillard's plans to go to C.A. were prior to the name change. 

The first hint of unrest happened shortly after Sam's birth. The Dillard's had already been "called to continue their mission" in Arkansas by then as well.

Add to all this that JB and TLC certainly knew that Jill's appearance on the show wasn't a factor in keeping it going. They have 19 children, well 18 kids minus Josh, 17 minus Jill, 18+ adding in Tyler and spouses.

They've had 4 or 5 weddings and 7 or 8 grandchildren happen since the Dillard's left the show.

Maybe Derick is pissed that the show didn't crash and burn without them.

  • Love 20
5 hours ago, Suzn said:

His story is fluid and ever-changing and yes, he totally ignores being fired by TLC.  I don't remember exactly how TLC explained it, but I think it was crystal clear and it was their decision to remove  D & J from the show.

I always thought that was a bit ambiguous. IIRC, people kept reaching out to TLC on social media, calling them out for Derick's behavior towards Jazz. TLC responded by saying that Derick was no longer on the show and hadn't been filmed in months. 

All of these people are sketchy, but I think if they had actually fired him, they would have stated that outright because of all the heat they were getting. The fact that they didn't makes me think that Derick was actually telling the truth about refusing to be on the show anymore. 

  • Useful 2
  • Love 20
22 hours ago, awaken said:

Has he said something publicly?  I don’t recall. 

Everything derick writes is word salad. 

There is a video of the family in Australia where Boob talks about Deanna having a child out of wedlock and how it negatively impacted her life. There are also interviews where he has stated his father wasn’t a good Christian.

Edited by SMama
  • Useful 2
  • Love 3
24 minutes ago, Absolom said:

TLC almost never says they've fired anyone.  They use euphemisms such as is no longer filming or being filmed.

Look at how TLC nearly destroyed Jon Gosselin, financially. (The ultimate damage to those children is yet to be determined.)  Would not be surprised if the same was threatened toward DD using Jon as an example.   The difference was there are a zillion Duggars and the threat was ultimately pointless.  

  • Love 2
5 minutes ago, fonfereksglen said:

Look at how TLC nearly destroyed Jon Gosselin, financially. (The ultimate damage to those children is yet to be determined.)  Would not be surprised if the same was threatened toward DD using Jon as an example.   The difference was there are a zillion Duggars and the threat was ultimately pointless.  

I don't know Jon Gosselin's story with TLC. Can someone elaborate and compare/contrast with Derelict's situation with TLC?

I agree there was an insurance policy from Derick’s dad passing away.  There would have also been his pension/retirement that could have been cashed out.  Cathy also strikes me as the type to save for college, so Derick likely got through undergrad without any student loans.  Cathy still works and remarried so I bet she doesn’t live off her first husband’s money much.  If anything it’s her retirement fund now.

They probably did live rent-free at the McMansion during the year at Walmart.  I’ve seen rumblings before that Derick likely took a (small) paycheck from SOS in addition to living in DA rent free.  With donations funding the rest of the lifestyle, they probably did pocket a little and have enough to pay a few grand in hospital bills.

  • Love 2
12 hours ago, GeeGolly said:

So if I was a volunteer on a show, I think I would at least talk with the family and TLC when the new name of the show was going to include my wife's name.

Izzy was born prior to the name change. The Dillard's plans to go to C.A. were prior to the name change. 

The first hint of unrest happened shortly after Sam's birth. The Dillard's had already been "called to continue their mission" in Arkansas by then as well.

Add to all this that JB and TLC certainly knew that Jill's appearance on the show wasn't a factor in keeping it going. They have 19 children, well 18 kids minus Josh, 17 minus Jill, 18+ adding in Tyler and spouses.

They've had 4 or 5 weddings and 7 or 8 grandchildren happen since the Dillard's left the show.

Maybe Derick is pissed that the show didn't crash and burn without them.

That makes complete sense. Everything about his 'tude screams of someone who was fired. Because he was fired he hoped it would crash and burned with him gone. Or that TLC  would see the error of their ways and come crawling back to him begging him to come back. But when that didn't happen it made him angry and he's tried to bring the show down because if he can't be on it then he doesn't want anyone else to be on it either. He's exactly the type who if he can't have something then he'll ruin it for everyone else. 

Edited by andromeda331
  • Love 10
13 hours ago, Zella said:

You bring up a good point--I will enjoy watching JB's house of cards fall, but if Derick doesn't think his own finances are going to be scrutinized in the process, he's got another thing coming.

Personally, I think there is some truth in what Derick is saying about the situation with JB (particularly about the current estrangement), but his story has changed so many times, especially regarding "contracts"--and what he has said doesn't make sense--that I am wary of some of the claims he's making. Especially, as I have said before, how he always conveniently ignores he was FIRED by TLC.

It's been pointed out to me that Austin has also mentioned not being paid, so I am more willing to accept that claim than I was, but I agree with you that not being paid doesn't necessarily equal no material benefit at all. 

There is a difference between being compensated and being paid. Being paid means you get to earn dollars for your labor (if you can call being on TV labor) and you control what you spend your money on.  Being compensated means you owe homage to JB and have to tow his line and that he approves of how you spend the money.  You wouldn't like it if you got "paid" but your boss decided you can't buy alcohol or pay rent because those aren't "worthy" endeavors.  I think Derrick is saying sure they got free rent as long as they acted in a way that JB approved of.  That's basically a form of slavery.

Derreck is still a miserable human being but adults appearing on TV, who sell their privacy for profits deserve to get a paycheck, not rent from an approving daddy.  Maybe Derrick did the Jazz rant to get fired so he could move on.  Not approving his views, just saying he might have had an ulterior motive that involved breaking free.

Or he's just stupid.

  • Useful 5
  • Love 16

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...