Jump to content

Type keyword(s) to search

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. 26 April “This is Bull Shih Tzu” New, Season 10, Episode (Ramona Jones vs. Lily Yoon) From the show site: An earless dog is allegedly the result of a tragic grooming mishap. Her owner had her hair dyed purple, and an allergic reaction led to severe chemical burns. The groomer claims she advised against the coloring, but the owner was insistent. Should she have stood firm in her professional judgment instead of giving in to keep a client happy? (I’m confused, I thought the coloring they use on animals is food coloring, not some chemical process that could cause burns? Or am I wrong? I remember watching a dog grooming competition quite a few years ago, and they did use a non-toxic food coloring on the dogs. ) Plaintiff suing defendant/dog groomer for $5,000, court maximum, because groomer agreed to dye dog purple at owner's insistance, and due to an allergic reaction the dog suffered severe chemical burns, and is now earless. I agree with Judge Tewolde, groomer claims she didn't want to do the dye, told plaintiff not to do it, but still groomer dyed the ears and tail purple, which is bizarre. After the dye job, a week later dog was uncomfortable, and vet said allergic reaction and Plaintiff's dog Pebbles had a litter well before she was one year old, and after puppies are weaned, the dye job happened. Defendant claims the color is safe on animals, and she's never had an issue with a reaction on the dog. Defendant has been using the same brand of dye for eight years. Plaintiff originally wanted the dogs ears and tail dyed when dog was 2 months old, and groomer refused until dog was over 1 year old. The dye job was two months after her first litter was weaned, and I'm guessing sold. I can't believe that plaintiff bred the dog very young. I bet it was only for money, because Pebbles cost $5,000. Plaintiff claims dog had chemical burns, and all for a trendy dye job. Plaintiff cliams she only trimmed the dog's hair, and still delayed going to the vet until over a week after the dye job. Corriero mentions that four states don't allow dying dog's hair. Defendant did refuse several times to do the dye job, but claims plaintiff kept demanding the dye, so she finally did the color job. Original request by plaintiff was for groomer to pay the vet bills. Now she wants vet bills and pain and suffering. (Plaintiff says she'll never dye the dog's hair again or her own, so I guess that awful wig is the result of that?) Plaintiff has no vet report about the situation. Defendant reads the Korean dye warnings, none of them say harmful. Without a vet report, how can the judges give a judgment? But vet bills, and grooming total $700. Corriero wouldn't give pain and suffering, because it might encourage others to dye their dog. So, 700 for vet bills, and grooming. $1,500, with Corriero dissenting for $720 because plaintiff demanded the dye job. Plaintiff gets $1500. “Car and Driver Missing Wire"” Rerun, Season 10, Episode p. 45, 10 January 2024
  3. Yeah, why no decisions on Tim's attire? Shouldn't men also dress modestly, or do they really believe that women don't find tight jeans defrauding? 🙄
  4. The brides probably won't even know it unless they watch this show and have a sharp eye. The dresses are just inanimate objects - hopefully 4 ladies will find them and wear them and have lovely days! 😃
  5. On April 30th, on H&I, they are supposed to be starting with Season 1, episode 1 of "Maverick." Finally, James Garner is back.
  6. "He's doing a lot of directing." Yeah, I'll bet. Because there aren't enough GENUINELY talented directors to go around so they need to hire chinless ex-producers no one wants to touch with a 10-foot pole to fill the void. I imagine this Travolta film goes straight to streaming service and paired with "Battlefield Earth" on a double bill. I can't think of a single reason that Travolta would agree to direction by this dilettante if he had a say in the matter. This just screams "low budget" - as in "UCLA Film School Low Budget."
  7. LOL at Julia regretting wearing that dress for the museum heist mission. But really, is there any mission where that dress wouldn’t have given your fellow contestants “dinner and a show”? And I had to wonder about the rules - seems like they would have benefited by removing jackets, loose tops, wigs, whatever, to better avoid the lasers.
  8. On April 30th, on H&I, they are supposed to be starting with Season 1, episode 1 of "Maverick." Finally James Garner is back.
  9. I am wondering why Timothy needed to post about the clothing decision for Heidi and the rest of it on fb at all. Was he afraid to tell mama and daddy in person and posted so Jill could read when he could be a safe distance away or what?? I wonder if they agreed on what Timothy should wear too. Will he wear jeans and a tucked in polo at all times, except when he feels he would be wearing it immodestly? 😂 Maybe someone pointed out how form fitting t shirts become when worn as swimming attire.
  10. We like that show. Just started watching so we're a bit behind. Jensen 's gonna play the brother.
  11. Yep, that too! I can't help but feel like it's bad luck or in poor taste for these bitter and angry MAFS Denver girls to donate their wedding dresses from failed joke MAFS marriages to terminally ill women who want to get married for real love during their last days. A donation to that type of charity should be with good intentions and without any negativity towards the actual dress that's being donated. The girls didn't really seem to care about the charity's cause, they were all boredly talking about the potential dress recipients and Emily was smirking all throughout it. It depressed me to watch it.
  12. Why does Olivia have to screech? Good lord Sasha was right in front of her and she’s screaming!
  13. Astronaut Howard Wolowitz that is. The snow-deciding choice of Caltech seems only marginally consistent with TBBT, where Sheldon broadcast is MIT distain by characterizing MIT as merely "trade school." There was scant indication I recall in TBBT that that characterization was wholely based on where Howard Wolowitz went, though reading his characterization that way would make the two shows more consistent on this point. Also, I don't get how a peer-reviewed journal article could be published with a named author unaware he was to be named as a co-author, or even aware it had ever been written. What exactly was author Sheldon's contribution if he didn't even know the article had even been drafted, let alone submitted with his name as an author?
  14. I know it was in 'import' to CW, but how about Serinda Swan?
  15. Awesome: Tracy telling Olivia it's NOT her kitchen it's actually Monica's, and the great conversation with stubborn Gregory. The last line, a sweet compliment from Gregory to Tracy. Awww! GF all day, every day. Laura's truth telling to Sonny when he asked if she's turning on him, too. "Who's going to protect [your children] from you" Strongest line from her. Also making the point that in the Sonny/Cyrus situation, there are two bad guys. Nina telling Carly, so much for earning the MC back on your own and Carly unable to dispute that. Alexis being an excellent sounding board for Molly and then Finn. Good for Alexis saying that TJ's anxiety/distrust of Kristina is the problem here, when Molly clearly doesn't want to think or feel anything negative about her domestic partner.
  16. well, cleared the board alright, of side characters that is, Spider, Duffy, Duffy's side-kick, plus new characters, Douglas, Sean and Ben. Poor Sarah, losing both siblings and damaged house. will she get any compensation? wonder which of the new slow horses will return, i presume the older ones will be back in S4. both Shirley and Marcus are at least capable fighters. Ho needs to stay behind the computer. Yes Catherine, MI5 cleans house when it has to, though at least they stuck to traitors mostly before Ingrid. i was under the impression that Cartright Sr was desk 1 to Partner's desk 2, but Catherine made it sound like Partner was desk 1. so who ordered Lamb to stand down, was it still Cartright as desk 2 and who was he taking orders from? did home office know about Partner? i had hoped that maybe those two chieftain soldiers would have balked after seeing Duffy kill douglas, but i guess not. they just had no qualms killing anyone else. guess river is finally wising up that the service isn't always doing the right thing. can't wait for S4, though now i'll have to wait week by week for the episodes.
  17. Yeah Chloe's full of crap. At one point she called the MAFS guys some of her "best". or "closest" friends. If she wasn't lying that's even sadder 😄
  18. What a ridiculously handsome family. Everybody pick a CW actress to play their sister.
  19. like donating your wedding gowns that you didn't even pay for?
  20. There are a lot of interviews and people discussing Top Chef in Wisconsin-- unlike some of the bigger cities, having TC in town is a highly visible and reported event. In any case, one chef described being contacted by the show or a rep from the show asking if he wanted to be in a TC episode. He said OF COURSE! He showed up where and when they told him. He had no idea what he was supposed to do or what he would be doing. He ended up filling a seat at the judges table for dining. So I think some of the people at the chef's table are literally fillers or "extras" the show keeps on hand to plug into the show where needed. Here is a how-do on chaos cooking. It's actually the kind of cooking I do! https://www.huffpost.com/entry/what-is-chaos-cooking_l_64a2e42de4b0dcb22c46c163
  21. Ms mb

    Mb maahs

    So this is the tightest race in American idol in a good while. But my question is why did Luke b judge abi so poorly this week. I love her and I know she can win this!!!
  22. My interest has waned with this show. Not to say that I don't like it, but I'm not chomping at the bit until I can watch the next episode. Maybe it's because as someone else posted upthread, the writers are pulling stories from the comics and I can't really enjoy it because it all seems so cobbled and has stuff that doesn't make sense. That is if you've read the comics, you know what's going on and are enjoying it. But for me? Who has never read them? Even with the first show in '92, the writes wrote that show so even non-comic readers could enjoy it and know what was going on, if that makes sense. So I'll just wait until all the rest of this season's episodes have aired and then watch them later. At this point, all I care about is bringing Remy back. Because I refuse to watch a show where he's DEAD. Hell, they brought Jean back to life on the original. I have NO DESIRE to revisit the Dark Phoenix saga again. And I hope that these writers remember or they can go back and watch the series finale from '97-that Xavier "died" and was taken to Shi'ar because that world had the capability to heal him, and not that he went a galaxy hopping to become consort to Lilandra.
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...