Jump to content

Type keyword(s) to search

The Lonely Js Club: James, Jackson & Johannah


Message added by Scarlett45,

Discussing the charges against Jana is fine, but do not post any information that reveals her address/contact information- even if said documents are public (i.e. a part of court proceedings.)

Discussing charges against Jana is NOT a jumping off point to speculate on other instances abuse/neglect etc towards the M-children or to elaborate on Josh's conviction and potential victims.  

 

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, merylinkid said:

It's one thing to leave your kids with a babysitter because you have to go work or care for a sick relative or even just a night out with friends.   It's another to dump your kids on your sister in law because you are spending all your time with your husband who can't be around kids.   A husband who was not sick as in needing care, who can feed and dress himself.   It's goes to neglect.   And judgment quite frankly.    She chose to wait on her husband rather than care for her small children who can't care for themselves.

Though I don't work for DCF, I do work with parents with DCF involvement. Getting a babysitter is seen as good judgement by DCF. Many DCF plans actually include parents agreeing to use a sitter if they're going to engage in things like drinking alcohol or using drugs. So if Anna was going to be intimate with her (scummy) husband, getting a babysitter is appropriate. And Josh was only accused of a crime then.

Also, at this point I don't think its been shown that Anna made a habit of dumping her kids excessively, to see Josh.

  • Useful 2
  • Love 3

I don't think this was a Duggar leak (or at least not a Duggar who supports the empire leak). In IBLP world, providing child care is one of a woman's only two jobs (the other being giving birth), and Jana not only failed at that, she failed in a way that drew even more negative heathen attention to this "godly" family.

 

  • Love 5
59 minutes ago, Cinnabon said:

Don’t parents at the minimum in Arkansas have to file some kind of paperwork with the state regarding their homeschooling plans? At least the name of the alleged “teacher?” And isn’t it supposed to be a parent? I assume Anna filed stating she was doing the homeschooling for her kids. But who knows?

The Arkansas homeschool laws have tightened up a tiny bit over the past few years, but they're still extremely loose. They do bar you from homeschooling if a registered sex offender lives in your home (not the case in every state). Basically, the Arkansas laws amount to the state covering its ass by collecting a bunch of statements from homeschooling parents in which the parents agree that, since they're homeschooling, every consequence of the kids' education, good or bad, is entirely the parents' responsibility. 

You have to send in a form each August stating that you'll be homeschooling kids x, y and z who are ages a, b and c. (or send in a form a few weeks in advance if you decide to start homeschooling mid-year).  The homeschooling parents have to affirm that they're wholly responsible for the education of and educational choices made for the children ages 5 through 17 who are being homeschooled, and as long as there is no registered sex offender living in the home, there aren't really any other requirements. 

The teacher can be literally anyone the parents choose. What that amounts to is that it can, in fact, be noone. You can just plunk them in front of a computer -- or a tv or a trash fire, if you want to --  and tell them to teach themselves. No requirement that parents must do the schooling, tell the state who is doing the schooling, or choose a teacher who meets any requirement whatsoever. No immunizations or anything like that are required. There are no curricular requirements. 

So there's nothing to file except the annual form listing the kids you intend to homeschool that year, and your address and other contact information. And since the Duggars have been homeschooling for years, somebody probably reminded Anna she needed to do this last summer or filled out the form so all she had to do was sign it, I'd guess. 

 

Edited by Churchhoney
  • Useful 3
7 minutes ago, Churchhoney said:

The Arkansas homeschool laws have tightened up a tiny bit over the past few years, but they're still extremely loose. They do bar you from homeschooling if a registered sex offender lives in your home (not the case in every state). Basically, the Arkansas laws amount to the state covering its ass by collecting a bunch of statements from homeschooling parents in which the parents agree that, since they're homeschooling, every consequence of the kids' education, good or bad, is entirely the parents' responsibility. 

You have to send in a form each August stating that you'll be homeschooling kids x, y and z who are ages a, b and c. (or send in a form a few weeks in advance if you decide to start homeschooling mid-year).  The homeschooling parents have to affirm that they're wholly responsible for the education of and educational choices made for the children ages 5 through 17 who are being homeschooled, and as long as there is no registered sex offender living in the home, there aren't really any other requirements. 

The teacher can be literally anyone the parents choose. What that amounts to is that it can, in fact, be noone. You can just plunk them in front of a computer -- or a tv or a trash fire, if you want to --  and tell them to teach themselves. No requirement that parents must do the schooling, tell the state who is doing the schooling, or choose a teacher who meets any requirement whatsoever. No immunizations or anything like that are required. There are no curricular requirements. 

So there's nothing to file except the annual form listing the kids you intend to homeschool that year, and your address and other contact information. And since the Duggars have been homeschooling for years, somebody probably reminded Anna she needed to do this last summer or filled out the form so all she had to do was sign it, I'd guess. 

 

Another huge failure in this country. We’re failing our kids. 😢

  • Love 10

Amy's IG Story might have confirmed what happened with Jana. If she was getting her digs in, this was really passive aggressive of her and uncalled for. Must be nice to have only one child to care for with your mom around all the time to babysit as opposed to, you know, being ordered by your abusive Boob Dad to care for like a dozen kids who aren't even yours. Amy needs to check herself. 

Screenshot_20211211-122429_Instagram.jpg

  • Love 1
7 minutes ago, Call Me Charlie said:

Amy's IG Story might have confirmed what happened with Jana. If she was getting her digs in, this was really passive aggressive of her and uncalled for. Must be nice to have only one child to care for with your mom around all the time to babysit as opposed to, you know, being ordered by your abusive Boob Dad to care for like a dozen kids who aren't even yours. Amy needs to check herself. 

Screenshot_20211211-122429_Instagram.jpg

I may have cracked a smile, but yes it’s unnecessary.

  • Love 15
2 minutes ago, BetyBee said:

How rude! I have never had the impression that Jana doesn't care for kids - she's been caring for Duggar kids since she could talk! I don't know what happened that day in September, but I would bet that Amy doesn't know either and this is a cheap shot.

Who knows what kind of history Amy and Jana have? It seems like Amy has a lot of pent up anger. Maybe Amy is making a statement about the lunacy of having 19 kids and expecting to be able to keep them all safe? In which case, she should have made it clear that she was taking a swing at JB and M, not Jana.

Edited by Cinnabon
  • Love 15
7 hours ago, GeeGolly said:

I would say a babysitter sleeping at 3pm while responsible for minor children is likely considered reckless. 

Agree, and that's why I think your earlier comment was right. I think Anna lost track of her kid and Jana fell on the sword for her. We already know Anna dodged at least one visit from CPS. I imagine Josh's arrest plus a child endangerment charge would certainly open that can of worms again and maybe the next time, Anna wouldn't have a choice. 

  • Love 17
4 hours ago, Adeejay said:

Why isn’t anyone reporting HOW she endangered a child?  Based on what I am seeing, Jana's name is the story headline, but entire story is about Josh. Nothing about Jana. This is so frustrating!

Crimes involving minor children often have the court documents sealed, so it can be tricky to get verifiable details unless someone makes a statement. Publications are just getting any scrap they can at this point. 

Edited by ElsieEm
  • Useful 2
  • Love 7
1 hour ago, Call Me Charlie said:

Amy's IG Story might have confirmed what happened with Jana. If she was getting her digs in, this was really passive aggressive of her and uncalled for. Must be nice to have only one child to care for with your mom around all the time to babysit as opposed to, you know, being ordered by your abusive Boob Dad to care for like a dozen kids who aren't even yours. Amy needs to check herself. 

Screenshot_20211211-122429_Instagram.jpg

What a bitch.

And really Amy, for full effect you should have been watching Home Alone. Karma is coming for you next.

  • Love 12

Regarding who was at the TTH at the time the child went missing...that was the week the Bontragers held their family camp. The Duggars also took off with the younger kids on that long motorhome trip around that time. So I don't think Jana had much help w/r/t childcare. 

The question remains: where was Anna?

Edited by emmawoodhouse
  • Useful 7
  • Love 7

You know how you might have a relative or 10 who annoy the hell of you and you talk shit about all their poor life choices all the time, but if anyone outside the family says something even slightly critical, you immediately defend them because YOU are allowed to insult your family, but no one else is? I feel the opposite with Amy and the Duggars. We, total strangers, are allowed to mock and criticize them, but how dare Amy, a family member, publicly mock them. I'm no Jana fan and have always suspected that she isn't the sweet, put upon spinster aunt everyone thinks, but that little dig of Amy's bothers me. It's not like she knows any more than we do about what happened. 

  • Love 20
7 minutes ago, emmawoodhouse said:

Regarding who was at the TTH at the time the child went missing...that was the week the Bontragers held their family camp. The Duggars also took off with the younger kids on that long motorhome trip around that time. So I don't think Jana had much help w/r/t childcare. 

The question remains: where was Anna?

Wait - there’s more than one family camp? Good god.

  • LOL 9
2 hours ago, crazy8s said:

Don't you all think this whole Child Endangerment citation was really a non event. There could have been lots of reasons a child was wandering alone on a road. But the officer was just so star struck a Duggar was involved, he just issued the citation to take down a Duggar, without looking at other possibilities....

You had me in the first half. 🤣

9 minutes ago, Cinnabon said:

I don’t know why I’ve been thinking about this for the last 30 minutes, but here goes. I think Amy has a LOT of anger and resentment built up toward the whole Duggar family and it’s coming out now (fair or not). JB has treated Deanna and Amy as “less than” his godly family in every way for her entire life. He has taken shots at Deanna’s choices, especially having Amy out of wedlock. He has spoken of the “sins of the father,” insinuating that Amy is somehow tainted. He has spoken of how his own father wasn’t religious enough, and I’m sure he thinks the same of Deanna and Amy. They are simply not as special, godly, and blessed as HIS huge family. Amy has seen how JB treated her grandfather and Grandma Mary. Who knows what details Mary shared with Deanna and Amy during her last few years when she lived with them. Now she finds out how much JB has been hiding all these years, when he has presented his family as superior to most others, and especially Amy’s.  When Mary died, I think we all know that JB tried to take full control of her assets (whether or not he was successful, who knows?) Why the hell would he ask Deanna and Mary to sign NDAs? His own sister and niece? 
 
Are her posts passive aggressive and immature? Yes. Can I understand her a bit for doing it anyway? Yes.

I see where you're coming from, but if JB has been that awful to them for so long, why were Deanna and Amy so involved with them for so long? They were never financial dependents of JB, as far as I know. If JB was dissing them publicly, it was because they wanted to be in the public eye. If I had a stupidly religious sibling, my interactions with them would be limited to the holidays as long as my parents were alive. 

  • Love 6
1 hour ago, BetyBee said:

How rude! I have never had the impression that Jana doesn't care for kids - she's been caring for Duggar kids since she could talk! I don't know what happened that day in September, but I would bet that Amy doesn't know either and this is a cheap shot.

Although she sometimes says or does what I'd call the right thing, cheap shots are, unfortunately, vintage Amy, as far as I can tell.

I don't know why you'd do this. If for no other reason because taking shots in many directions weakens the effectiveness of what you say about the worst things. Nobody cares much about the criticisms of somebody who comes off as an indiscriminate grouch. 

 

  • Love 9
1 minute ago, lascuba said:

You had me in the first half. 🤣

I see where you're coming from, but if JB has been that awful to them for so long, why were Deanna and Amy so involved with them for so long? They were never financial dependents of JB, as far as I know. If JB was dissing them publicly, it was because they wanted to be in the public eye. If I had a stupidly religious sibling, my interactions with them would be limited to the holidays as long as my parents were alive. 

For sure, Amy took advantage of their tv spotlight and wanted some for herself. And I’m sure she enjoyed playing and hanging out with all of her cousins, being an only child. But he seemed to still treat her as less than his kids, and even as a “bad influence” at times. All the while, he was hiding what Josh had done. And I’m sure even today, JB is acting as if his family is far superior to Deanna’s and Amy’s . 

Her resentment and anger, now having heard the horrid details, just seems understandable to me. And who knows what Jill has told her. 

  • Useful 1
  • Love 16
13 minutes ago, Cinnabon said:

Was Hilaria’s husband there? Because he has been seen in a “straight pride” t-shirt 🤦‍♀️

He seems like a piece of work. I've still not recovered from that footage of him letting the court door nearly slam in her face from this past week. No wonder she's enchanted with Jed Jason. 

  • LOL 9
  • Love 7
1 hour ago, Zella said:

My heart longs for more information, but my brain tells me I don't really want to know. Lol

😂 Not to worry, it's mostly arm wrestling, pushups, and carrying of logs. The usual fundie shit. 😁

At any rate, I seem to recall pics of Jackson and Hannie with various Bontragers and Bowers. I think they went on the motorhome trip from there. They weren't that far from Yellowstone and the other places they visited.

  • LOL 5

Uhoh, what do the charges do to Jana's chance for matrimonial happiness? (I kid). Surely no godly man will want her now, she's past her child-bearing prime and has the good luck to be related to Josh. And she's not a man (who should he rape someone they will always find someone to marry like that other guy did).

  • Love 2
1 hour ago, Cinnabon said:

But he seemed to still treat her as less than his kids, and even as a “bad influence” at times.

He treated his own daughters as "less than" and Amy fully embraced the "bad influence" character. I am sure she's angry, but there are better ways to express yourself. Twitter cheap shots are dumb.

  • Love 8
7 hours ago, lascuba said:

I was just thinking something along these lines. That Jana wasn't the only adult in the house but she took the fall to prevent Michelle or Anna from getting in any trouble. I usually scoff at the "poor, sacrificial Jana" narrative but this seems plausible to me. Anna is going through a lot and was heavily pregnant at the time,  and the entire family dynamic is based on keeping Michelle stress free. 

Not to excuse losing track of a child enough for them to wander off (if that's what happened), but I think the fact they have so many children has made the adults less, not more, vigilant. Kids are resilient, they'll be fine, etc. Plus, when there are multiple adults around, it's easy to get comfortable and assume someone else is keeping watch. This kind of thing probably happens all the time in that house. 

What if Anna had left Johanna and/or Jenni in charge? They didn't notice the little one had got up from her nap and found her way out. Jana is home by the time the police show up and takes the blame to protect her sisters. Just a thought.

  • Love 8
2 hours ago, Cinnabon said:

I don’t know why I’ve been thinking about this for the last 30 minutes, but here goes. I think Amy has a LOT of anger and resentment built up toward the whole Duggar family and it’s coming out now (fair or not). JB has treated Deanna and Amy as “less than” his godly family in every way for her entire life. He has taken shots at Deanna’s choices, especially having Amy out of wedlock. He has spoken of the “sins of the father,” insinuating that Amy is somehow tainted. He has spoken of how his own father wasn’t religious enough, and I’m sure he thinks the same of Deanna and Amy. They are simply not as special, godly, and blessed as HIS huge family. Amy has seen how JB treated her grandfather and Grandma Mary. Who knows what details Mary shared with Deanna and Amy during her last few years when she lived with them. Now she finds out how much JB has been hiding all these years, when he has presented his family as superior to most others, and especially Amy’s.  When Mary died, I think we all know that JB tried to take full control of her assets (whether or not he was successful, who knows?) Why the hell would he ask Deanna and Mary to sign NDAs? His own sister and niece? 
 
Are her posts passive aggressive and immature? Yes. Can I understand her a bit for doing it anyway? Yes.

I agree. 

I think Amy hangs out with the Duggars, because of Mary when she was alive. Both her mother and her grandmother liked to hang out with the family, particularly Mary. She doesn't have as strong a family identity without them. 

Who knows why Amy is mad at Jana? It could there more inter-cousins fights we don't about. Jana seems to be very fundie, maybe she's looked down on Amy and her upbringing. Maybe Jana is defending Josh? Who Knows?

Yes, Jana is a victim of a cult, but she is also at this point responsible for some of her own actions. Maybe she upholds the cult too much. Being in a cult affects everyone including those cult adjacent like Amy. 

 

  • Love 8

I generally have a favorable opinion of Jana, but she is mostly responsible for the mess she's in. If she agreed to watch a child and that child was in danger, then that's on her. 

Yes, she's been stuck being the babysitter probably forever, but she agreed to watch the child. If harm had actually happened to the child, then she, Jana, would be responsible. It sounds like the kid was fine; just in a dangerous situation.

I have some sympathy for Jana myself, but the charges are real and probably deserved. There is a limit to how much sympathy I can have for Jana in this situation.

  • LOL 1
  • Love 15
Message added by Scarlett45,

Discussing the charges against Jana is fine, but do not post any information that reveals her address/contact information- even if said documents are public (i.e. a part of court proceedings.)

Discussing charges against Jana is NOT a jumping off point to speculate on other instances abuse/neglect etc towards the M-children or to elaborate on Josh's conviction and potential victims.  

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...