Jump to content

Type keyword(s) to search

The Duggars: In the Media and TLC

Null 302

By Null 302
in Counting On

Guest

As a reminder, the site's Politics Policy remains in effect.  Yes, Jim Bob is apparently running for office again. That does not make it an acceptable topic of conversation in here - unless for some mysterious reason, TLC brings the show back and it is discussed on there. Even then, it would be limited to how it was discussed on the show.

If you have any questions, please PM the mods, @SCARLETT45 and myself.

  • Reply
  • Start Topic

Recommended Posts

AstridM

AstridM

37 minutes ago, mimionthebeach said:

"God" has given Lori a brain tumer. Twice. How she doesn't see that as a "sign" is another layer of delusion. 

She is a vile human being. She can't help herself. 

And I’m sure she didn’t stay home and just trust her imaginary sky daddy to cure her. 

  • Like 5
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
  • Replies 13k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

cmr2014
cmr2014

I was thinking about this and the idea that the girls weren't "harmed" and weren't "damaged goods" which led me to realize that ALL of the Duggar children are "damaged goods" and I think that's becomi

Churchhoney
Churchhoney

They put themselves on tv and have proclaimed over and over and over and over again that their way of life is the way to ensure that your children are totally safe from every evil of the world, and in

WhitneyWhit
WhitneyWhit

I don't know where to post this but I fucking met Michelle Duggar. Let me set the scene. So my cousin is getting married and we were at a shop looking at dresses here in Kentucky when the Duggars marc

Posted Images

Bookish Jen

Bookish Jen

4 hours ago, mimionthebeach said:

"God" has given Lori a brain tumer. Twice. How she doesn't see that as a "sign" is another layer of delusion. 

She is a vile human being. She can't help herself. 

She is also very anti-vac and got Covid and shingles at the same time.

On-topic: Did anyone see the Jinger interview on Good Morning America this morning?

  • Like 3
  • Sad 2
Link to comment
Absolom

Absolom

(edited)
4 hours ago, Salacious Kitty said:

Actually, she did. Her tumor was benign, and IIRC, she claimed her diet shrunk it. 

She lied.  She went to UCI hospital for specialized tumor treatment.  She probably did her woo stuff in addition.

Edited by Absolom
  • Mind Blown 4
  • Useful 4
Link to comment
sagittarius sue

sagittarius sue

1 hour ago, Bookish Jen said:

She is also very anti-vac and got Covid and shingles at the same time.

Ha, one could interpret that as a message from God.  "I sent you medical expertise with vaccines, and you didn't pay attention.

Yes, about Jinger's appearance on GMA, a link posted earlier on the Jinger/Jeremy topic.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
cmr2014

cmr2014

On 1/24/2023 at 3:42 PM, louannems said:

I used to read some of her stuff and listen to some of her videos.  She is truly awful and very abusive.  She has frequently given detailed accounts of how she would order her two year old to “pick up your toys” and when the toddle refused, Lori would remove her pants and whip her with a leather strap.  She explained that you must hit hard enough for the kid to scream, not just whimper.

Any parent would know that you don’t give a two year old a generic order like pick up your toys without getting on the floor and helping them, maybe make a game or song of it.

I think that's kind of the point -- at least that's the Pearl method. You bait the child into doing/not doing something, and then beat him/her for doing/not doing what you encouraged.

In this case, you give a young child a task that he may not be able to fully understand or perform, and them beat him for failing to complete it. And, of course, the more vicious and psychotic the beating, the more "Biblical" it is (e.g. making a 2-year-old scream vs whimper).

  • Mind Blown 2
  • Sad 19
Link to comment
ChiCricket

ChiCricket

24 minutes ago, MaryAnneSpier said:

Has anyone seen updates about the documentary about Gothardism that was announced awhile back? I think Amazon was supposed to be involved...? Just shortly after it was announced, the Bates' show was cancelled.

I only found this: (but it's from Jan. 7, 2022) 

  "  Variety recently announced that Amazon Studios is producing a docuseries on the religious organization that counts the Duggars among its members, as well as other reality-TV families, like the Plaths ("Welcome to Plathville") and Bates ("Bringing Up Bates"). The series, which will debut in late 2022 or 2023, promises to do for the Duggars' church what "LuLaRich" did for the LuLaRoe multilevel marketing company: expose the shadier side of a seemingly wholesome lifestyle."

https://www.thelist.com/719485/this-new-amazon-documentary-could-be-the-lularich-of-the-duggar-family/

 

  • Like 1
  • Useful 4
Link to comment
quarks

quarks

This is the official press release from Amazon:

https://press.amazonstudios.com/us/en/press-release/gripping-new-docuseries-coming-to-prime-video-show

 

That press release noted that the docuseries was already in production (which means that cameras were rolling by December 2021) but did not give a release date; the "late 2022 or 2023" timeframe is an addition from Variety and The Hollywood Reporter, presumably backed up by some reporting.

 

  • Useful 5
Link to comment
Zella

Zella

IMO if The Hollywood Reporter has anything on it, they likely had some reliable information on it being in production at the time. (Of course, who knows what's happened since then. Maybe it shuttered or maybe they've just been working quietly.) But THR is considered a long-standing trade paper of the industry. Not that I actually know anything about Hollywood firsthand, but I've noticed just from following entertainment news that they do often run a lot of legitimate inside scoops and have deep-dives on industry issues. 

Also fun random fact: the guy who founded it is the same guy who Bugsy Siegel infamously stole the Flamingo Hotel from in Las Vegas! Obviously the paper worked out better. LOL 

  • Like 4
  • Useful 5
  • LOL 3
Link to comment
madpsych78

madpsych78

21 hours ago, quarks said:

Deadline has it listed under 2023 TBA shows, a list which also confirms that we still don't have an official release date for Animaniacs or The Crown yet.

Full list here:

https://deadline.com/feature/2023-tv-premiere-dates-streaming-cable-broadcast-new-series-returning-series-1235138890/

 

Does R.E.M. know that they are using the name of one of their songs, which incidentally is from the same album as "Losing My Religion"?

  • Like 8
Link to comment
AstridM

AstridM

21 minutes ago, madpsych78 said:

Does R.E.M. know that they are using the name of one of their songs, which incidentally is from the same album as "Losing My Religion"?

That’s the first thing I thought about. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
quarks

quarks

11 hours ago, madpsych78 said:

Does R.E.M. know that they are using the name of one of their songs, which incidentally is from the same album as "Losing My Religion"?

I have no idea what R.E.M. knows or doesn't know, but as Gemma Violet notes, R.E.M. didn't originate the term/phrase And this documentary isn't the first to use the title - it's also the name of an episode in the fourth season of Angel, very definitely in reference to the song.

It's also a fairly safe bet that the name was cleared through Amazon's attorneys. And since "Shiny Happy People" doesn't seem to be trademarked (by R.E.M. or by Amazon), I'm guessing it falls under fair use. 

  • Like 3
  • Useful 1
Link to comment
mythoughtis

mythoughtis

(edited)
1 hour ago, kaleidoscope said:

According to cafemom:  Amazon's Upcoming Docuseries on the Duggars Will Expose Shocking Details About the Family

https://cafemom.com/entertainment/amazon-docuseries-duggars-shocking

It says it will be previewed this coming Thursday by the press.  I'm anxious to hear if anything new comes out.

If you read the entire article, it admits that most of us know the details.  It’s the casual viewer that will learn ‘shocking  details’.  

Edited by mythoughtis
  • Like 6
  • Useful 4
Link to comment
Salacious Kitty

Salacious Kitty

So, I am curious how much the IBLP will play into this? And why dump the Bateses just to focus on the Duggars? The Bateses are cult power brokers. Gil is still on the board and making speeches at Family Camp. I'd have enjoyed watching them get ripped apart.

  • Like 15
  • Useful 3
Link to comment
  • Popular Post
DXD526

DXD526

  • Popular Post
Quote

If you read the entire article, it admits that most of us know the details.  It’s the casual viewer that will learn ‘shocking  details’. 

That's what I figured. I don't think anything about this trashy family would shock me, at this point. If they found a bunch of heads in a TTH freezer, I'd be like, yeah, I kind of suspected...

  • Like 3
  • LOL 22
Link to comment
quarks

quarks

(edited)
2 hours ago, quickjessie said:

How does this family keep getting on TV???

In this very specific case, Amazon Studios has been looking for some cheaper projects to fill the gaps between their high profile, very expensive shows like Lord of the Rings: Rings of Power.

Edited by quarks
  • Useful 2
Link to comment
Salacious Kitty

Salacious Kitty

3 minutes ago, MaryAnneSpier said:

Is the upcoming TBA series about the Duggars the same one that was supposed to be about IBLP/the famous fundie families? Or is that a separate series? 

The same. It looks like production pivoted at some point to point the lens specifically on the Duggars. 

  • Like 1
  • Useful 1
Link to comment
Salacious Kitty

Salacious Kitty

16 minutes ago, CalicoKitty said:

I wonder if this series has anything to do with the Bates cancellation.  There has to be some explanation.

 

There was no mention of the Bateses in the article. It appears that the focus will be on the Duggars. 

  • Like 2
  • Useful 2
Link to comment
Zella

Zella

24 minutes ago, CalicoKitty said:

I wonder if this series has anything to do with the Bates cancellation.  There has to be some explanation.

 

I don't even follow the Bateses and I still wonder what was up with that. Their messaging around it was very weird. I got some real mutually assured destruction vibes between them and the channel. 

  • Like 11
  • Useful 2
Link to comment
Salacious Kitty

Salacious Kitty

(edited)
6 minutes ago, Zella said:

I don't even follow the Bateses and I still wonder what was up with that. Their messaging around it was very weird. I got some real mutually assured destruction vibes between them and the channel. 

UP had an entire season in the can. IIRC, they cancelled no more than two weeks out from the season premiere. No explanation was ever given from either UP or the Bateses. There was the "George Floyd" video, but UP was filming that game of charades, so I assume they saw Carlin filming. If not, and they only found out when Carlin released the video, it could have been a big part of the reason. 

Edited by Salacious Kitty
  • Like 7
  • Useful 3
Link to comment
Zella

Zella

2 minutes ago, Salacious Kitty said:

UP had an entire season in the can. IIRC, they cancelled no more than two weeks out from the season premiere. No explanation was ever given from either UP or the Bateses. There was the "George Floyd" video, but UP was filming that game of charades, so I assume they saw Carlin filming. If not, and they only found out when Carlin released the video, it could have been a big part of the reason. 

Yep and the family's comments were not at all ones of surprise or displeasure with being cancelled so suddenly and with a full season canned. It's just weird. 

  • Like 8
  • Useful 1
Link to comment
Salacious Kitty

Salacious Kitty

2 minutes ago, Zella said:

Yep and the family's comments were not at all ones of surprise or displeasure with being cancelled so suddenly and with a full season canned. It's just weird. 

Yeah, they really played it off as if it was NBD. You know Gil was seething. That show got him out of the poorhouse, and several daughters called BUB "Dad's show." That was the reason Whitney changed from jeans to a skirt to film at Papa Bill's farm and other pants wearing daughters were only filmed in skirts. Gil ran the show. 

  • Like 6
  • Useful 1
Link to comment
AstridM

AstridM

1 hour ago, Salacious Kitty said:

The documentary was originally going to focus on the IBLP with mention of the Duggars (and possibly Bateses? I don't recall). Today's article reveals why there was such a delay in the release. 

Damn. I really wanted to see the Bates dragged.

  • Like 6
  • Applause 2
  • LOL 5
Link to comment
  • Popular Post
merylinkid

merylinkid

  • Popular Post
13 hours ago, Salacious Kitty said:

So, I am curious how much the IBLP will play into this? And why dump the Bateses just to focus on the Duggars? The Bateses are cult power brokers. Gil is still on the board and making speeches at Family Camp. I'd have enjoyed watching them get ripped apart.

I'd rather one that focused on IBLP in general.   The Duggars  aren't a one off.   The whole cult needs to be exposed not just one family treated as an outlier because of FF.   

  • Like 28
Link to comment
GeeGolly

GeeGolly

(edited)

Now that time has passed and this documentary is actually real, I wonder if UP cancelled the Bates due to both the George Floyd remark and the (potential) documentary.

The Bates family had skated along with a lot of low key racism, but UP seemed to think Kelly having a Black sister countered that. Both TLC and UP knew the Bates and Duggars skated along with little sprigs of IBLP patriarchy and 'spare the rod' parenting popping up, but a lot of viewers didn't seem to care or notice. A documentary saying the quiet parts aloud certainly would not be wanted.

I wonder if UP new the documentary was really happening and was concerned it would air during the cancelled season and combined with Carlin's George Floyd post it would be too much drama to downplay.

And wow, it sucks the documentary is basically a Duggar clickbait show and not a real exposé about IBLP and IFBs in general. IMO, the producers went for money rather than exposing the horrors behind the curtain.

Edited by GeeGolly
  • Like 8
Link to comment
GeeGolly

GeeGolly

I wonder if the documentary slant will be about a family who are victims of a cult or a family who assisted in running a cult. IMO, the Duggar and Bates families are really victims. Not saying they remained innocent victims, especially at this point, but victims none the less.

  • Useful 1
Link to comment
Guest

As a reminder, the site's Politics Policy remains in effect.  Yes, Jim Bob is apparently running for office again. That does not make it an acceptable topic of conversation in here - unless for some mysterious reason, TLC brings the show back and it is discussed on there. Even then, it would be limited to how it was discussed on the show.

If you have any questions, please PM the mods, @SCARLETT45 and myself.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...