Jump to content

Type keyword(s) to search

S04.E08: 48:1


Message added by formerlyfreedom

Stick to discussion of the episode, please. Discussion or mention of future events is NOT ALLOWED in episode topics, including mention of individuals who have not yet appeared or events that occur in future decades. Posts will be removed; repeated violations may incur further sanctions.

  • Reply
  • Start Topic

Recommended Posts

Quote

 And if that thing about her son being a businessman in South Africa, which the show implies colored her decisions towards the country, is true, then that should be grounds for removal from office. 

Oh, that's true. Well, that he was a businessman, but she naturally denied that it coloured her decision. I went into a little bit more detail regarding Marc Thatcher in the gossip discussion.

I think a lot of the perception of Thatcher has changed with hindsight, though.

  • Useful 2
  • Love 6
Link to comment
Quote

And just to be clear, I don't think emotional has anything to do with gender. Men can be very emotional and woman can be unemotional. How that is expressed and how the world responds to those expressions tend to be gendered but having emotions? That's for all genders

Naturally it doesn't, but there are certain things society has decided to code as "feminine" and others which have been coded as "masculine". And it is kind of gross that a lot of "feminine" things are actually pretty good approaches to conflict. In reality there are naturally women who act very "masculine" (see Thatcher) and men who have no problem with embracing a supposedly "feminine" approach.

  • Love 10
Link to comment
41 minutes ago, Bananna said:

If only Tommy Lascelles was still around, the crisis would have been averted!

LOL at Charles calling his siblings "the fringe" think it's one of the few times this season we haven't seen him moping. Tom Byrne was perfectly cast as Andrew; he's so smarmy it's great.

Only thing: was Charles thinking about slimming down the monarchy even then?

  • Useful 4
  • Love 4
Link to comment
2 minutes ago, Ellaria Sand said:

Finally, an episode that shows the true nature of Margaret Thatcher. Her pompous bearing in her conversation with the Queen was infuriating. I wanted to slap her in that stiff, hair-sprayed head. And, of course, the press secretary gets tossed under the bus to protect the sovereign’s poor judgement. Glad to know that he became a best selling author.

I need to re-watch some of this season with particular attention to Maggie T's hair. I could be wrong, but that head of hair seemed to get bigger and bigger as the season went on, but I think it had lost some size by the time she was ousted from the party leadership. Hmm.

  • LOL 3
  • Love 7
Link to comment

It might have been 48 against 1 when it came to sanctioning South Africa, but that 1 was the big cheese.

I don't think the queen ever wore the Vladimir tiara without either the pearl or emerald pendants. But that was probably pretty hard to duplicate.

Olivia Colman's face during the queen's meeting with Thatcher after the newspaper article was a marvel.

"That was impressively cunty." *chef's kiss*  Brava, Anne.

Palace press secretaries are usually the one who take the blame when the press gets out of the palace's control. It's not fair, but it's part of the job to fall on one's sword when necessary.

  • Love 23
Link to comment
32 minutes ago, GHScorpiosRule said:

It was actually Edward who said that. 

Fun random factoid for fans of British TV - the actor who plays Edward is the son of Celia Imrie and the late Benjamin Whitrow, who played Mr. Bennet in the '95 Pride & Prejudice.

  • Useful 8
  • Love 14
Link to comment
56 minutes ago, Ellaria Sand said:

Finally, an episode that shows the true nature of Margaret Thatcher. Her pompous bearing in her conversation with the Queen was infuriating. I wanted to slap her in that stiff, hair-sprayed head. And, of course, the press secretary gets tossed under the bus to protect the sovereign’s poor judgement. Glad to know that he became a best selling author.

Yes! Yes! Yes! Thatcher is straight up villainous in this portrayal and if she really opposed sanctions to starve off apartheid the it is justified 

  • Love 11
Link to comment

Yes, Thatcher opposed sanctions. And yes, her son was a businessman in South Africa. She always denied that there was any relation between those two, though.

Question: The top secretary or whatever it is for the Queen, is that the same character she wanted to promote too early in season 1, or is this someone else?

  • Love 1
Link to comment
49 minutes ago, swanpride said:

Mmm...according to the Wikipedia page he should already be retired at this point...oh well, who cares.

Yes, it's clear that they must change some minor things. If there were a new Private Secretary, he must have been introduced. 

Spoiler

It will be interesting to see whether they give the brother-in-law to Diana, Robert Fellowes, the Private Secretary in 1990-1999, a prominent role in the next season. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Fellowes,_Baron_Fellowes

 

  • Love 4
Link to comment

This episode was great! Thatcher was a truly horrid woman. I mean, I already knew some things about her, but I see she was awful as a person as well. Otoh, the Queen made a mistake when she went against her Prime Minister.

I'm enjoying all the digs directed at Andrew so much! And I loved to have Claire Foy back for this episode.

  • Love 19
Link to comment

I think I may be becoming an honorary British Monarchist because the scene of Thatcher repeatedly interrupting the QUEEN was just INFURIATING.  Then again, I was equally mortified by that one courtier being sacrificed in order for the Queen to save face.  I'm going to have to watch the episode again because, unless I'm mistaken, the courier who was dismissed is the one who advised AGAINST the leak to the press.  If so . . . damn. "Palace Intrigue" is COLD.

Edited by WatchrTina
  • Love 22
Link to comment
14 hours ago, Deputy Deputy CoS said:

Yes! Yes! Yes! Thatcher is straight up villainous in this portrayal and if she really opposed sanctions to starve off apartheid the it is justified 

I'm waiting for her to be twirling her mustache from her underground lair. GA's portrayal comes across as cartoonish. 

In general, they've used a lot of creative license this season. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-8952991/The-Crown-true-false-Netflix-shows-twisted-version-royal-history.html https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8957695/Queens-former-press-secretary-Dickie-Arbiter-blasts-scenes-Crown.html

  • LOL 1
  • Love 5
Link to comment
On 11/16/2020 at 6:51 PM, Jeeves said:

I need to re-watch some of this season with particular attention to Maggie T's hair. I could be wrong, but that head of hair seemed to get bigger and bigger as the season went on, but I think it had lost some size by the time she was ousted from the party leadership. Hmm.

I've noticed that her hair changes size depending on what she is feeling or doing that day.  When she is upstairs at Downing St., it is smaller.   Her hair becomes massive when she is girding her loins politically.   It really is her armor.  

 

On 11/16/2020 at 9:04 AM, dubstepford wife said:

I kind of love the scene where Charles calls Andrew "fringe."  This show has not been subtle when it comes to Andy, from foreshadowing his problems with underage girls to him wanting a larger royal role for himself and his children, and Charles throwing it back in his face.  I don't think Peter Morgan is any fan of old Andrew.

This show is certainly not being kind to Thatcher.  I wasn't around for that era so I don't know what's true and what's fiction, but if even half of this is factually accurate she is not coming across well.  Opposition to ending apartheid is never a good look, regardless of consequences for the economy.  And if that thing about her son being a businessman in South Africa, which the show implies colored her decisions towards the country, is true, then that should be grounds for removal from office.  It's outright corruption.

While it is easy to dunk on Margaret Thatcher decades after her tenure as prime minister, the show is not really worse than history.   The show is not twisting history to make Margaret look worse than what she actually did.  I know her words to the Queen expressing her condolences back in episode one were what she said about Irish Nationalist just not in that particular moment.  Her being a racist is not a stretch for me. 

  • Useful 8
  • Love 8
Link to comment
12 hours ago, Spartan Girl said:

 

Loved the Claire Foy flashback with young Liz giving the speech and the whole world listening.

I think the people we saw were supposed to represent the entire empire (at the time), rather than it being a world wide event.  I did love seeing Claire Foy! 

 

4 hours ago, tennisgurl said:

Olivia Coleman did a great job this week, you could really see how angry Elizabeth was getting as Thatcher kept insulting her and her position, but she was still trying to keep her poker face. 

I'm of two minds on this.  Margaret Thatcher's position was indefensible, but I also think the Queen wildly overstepped and Thatcher was right to be furious with her. 

 

4 hours ago, tennisgurl said:

 

I think this might be the first time that the four Windsor kids were all alone in a scene together, and of course its bitter and snaky and whiny. Charles telling Andrew that he was a "fringe" royal really was, as Edward said, impressively cunty, but considering what a smug ass Andrew is and how he was just shit talking Charles to their mother, I cant even really blame him. 

The whole thing was fascinating.  Andrew, Edward and Anne may want to take a look at Margaret as a warning for their future once they go from being the children of the Sovereign to the siblings then (eventually) the aunt and uncles of Sovereign. 

  • Love 7
Link to comment

Wow, it was GREAT having Claire Foy return and she made the most out of her scene.  I think Olivia has been really good on this show but when Claire Foy was back, her presence just said "Queen Elizabeth."

I have to admit, I like the image of the Queen and Thatcher bringing their purses into battle.

Gillian Anderson does a lot better when she works off of Olivia Colman and when her character raises her voice because she isn't...talking...soooo....sloooowly.  But her performance has not been a highlight of this season.

  • Love 16
Link to comment
On 11/16/2020 at 12:19 AM, MrsR said:

Lovely to see Claire again. May I presume she stiffed them for some big bucks?

I haven't yet read anything about the filming of that scene, so we'll probably find out eventually, but my initial thought was that it was a scene filmed during the first season that was, for some reason, unused.

Edited to add: Nope, my assumption was wrong. Claire Foy filmed the scene in November, 2019.

Claire Foy Returns as Queen Elizabeth in Season 4 of 'The Crown'

Edited by ProudMary
  • Useful 1
  • Love 5
Link to comment
On 11/16/2020 at 4:04 PM, dubstepford wife said:

I kind of love the scene where Charles calls Andrew "fringe."  This show has not been subtle when it comes to Andy, from foreshadowing his problems with underage girls to him wanting a larger royal role for himself and his children, and Charles throwing it back in his face.  I don't think Peter Morgan is any fan of old Andrew.

I unreservedly love it. Incredibly cunty indeed. Andrew's whining about not being the centre of attention on his special day was insufferable. Good on Charles for immediately cutting him at the knees. 

On 11/16/2020 at 8:42 PM, Brn2bwild said:

Only thing: was Charles thinking about slimming down the monarchy even then?

I think Andrew himself mentioned something about it in an earlier episode. Maybe when he came to tell Elizabeth about his upcoming marriage. 

On 11/17/2020 at 1:45 AM, Ellaria Sand said:

Finally, an episode that shows the true nature of Margaret Thatcher. Her pompous bearing in her conversation with the Queen was infuriating. I wanted to slap her in that stiff, hair-sprayed head. And, of course, the press secretary gets tossed under the bus to protect the sovereign’s poor judgement. Glad to know that he became a best selling author.

I wanted to snatch her purse and smack her with it. Both her rhetoric and the fact that she wouldn't let the other person in the conversation finish their sentence were infuriating, queen or no queen. 

  • Love 20
Link to comment
On 11/17/2020 at 6:58 PM, txhorns79 said:

 

I'm of two minds on this.  Margaret Thatcher's position was indefensible, but I also think the Queen wildly overstepped and Thatcher was right to be furious with her. 

I agree. Thatcher was horrendous, but at the end of the day the Windsors are nothing more than figureheads who cut ribbons and christen ships. They don't have the pressure of making decisions that have real-world consequences for millions of people. Obviously sanctions should've been a no-brainer, but the Queen definitely overstepped her bounds.

With that said, I love how the scandal eclipsed sniveling Andrew's wedding. 

  • Love 15
Link to comment
6 hours ago, 3 is enough said:

Small nitpick, but during the opening sequence when they were showing the various Commonwealth nations while the Queen was giving her speech they omitted Canada.  Pissed this Canadian off.

Yeah, they skipped Canada in that sequence, but Australia got a nod. Probably because it wouldn't be obvious to viewers what Canada was, unless they showed people playing hockey? Canada didn't even have a maple-leaf flag at that point, so they couldn't have even used that as a background clue. Later on, at the Commonwealth Conference, I did see someone sitting at the big round conference table with a little Canadian flag in front of him, but it was a brief camera pan to the right. I'm assuming this was probably supposed to be Brian Mulroney.

There was a lot of funny stuff in this episode - I loved the verbal sparring between the Queen and Thatcher. I wanted to cheer when the Queen stated that she too saw herself as a "tribal leader in an eccentric costume" - totally laughed at this.

Also loved Charles laying the smack-down on bratty self-important Andrew. You can tell the show-runners REALLY hate Andrew.

 

 

  • Love 15
Link to comment
7 hours ago, 3 is enough said:

Small nitpick, but during the opening sequence when they were showing the various Commonwealth nations while the Queen was giving her speech they omitted Canada. 

I'll still trying to decide whether the sheep were Australia or New Zealand. 

  • Love 1
Link to comment
9 hours ago, Cheezwiz said:

Yeah, they skipped Canada in that sequence, but Australia got a nod. Probably because it wouldn't be obvious to viewers what Canada was, unless they showed people playing hockey? Canada didn't even have a maple-leaf flag at that point, so they couldn't have even used that as a background clue. Later on, at the Commonwealth Conference, I did see someone sitting at the big round conference table with a little Canadian flag in front of him, but it was a brief camera pan to the right. I'm assuming this was probably supposed to be Brian Mulroney.

I did notice Mulroney- I must confess I had to check who was prime minister at that time- couldn't remember if it was him or John Turner.  

They could have shown the Rockies, or Niagara Falls, or a farmer cutting wheat on the prairies- it's just that Canada's sheer size makes it a huge part of the Commonwealth.

9 hours ago, Gareth3 said:

I'll still trying to decide whether the sheep were Australia or New Zealand. 

I'm thinking Australia- it seemed that the background did not look as lush and green as New Zealand.  So one of those countries got stiffed too.  Obviously they could not show every single country in the Commonwealth, but it still seemed like a glaring omission.

  • Love 2
Link to comment
21 hours ago, Cheezwiz said:

Yeah, they skipped Canada in that sequence, but Australia got a nod. Probably because it wouldn't be obvious to viewers what Canada was, unless they showed people playing hockey? Canada didn't even have a maple-leaf flag at that point, so they couldn't have even used that as a background clue. Later on, at the Commonwealth Conference, I did see someone sitting at the big round conference table with a little Canadian flag in front of him, but it was a brief camera pan to the right. I'm assuming this was probably supposed to be Brian Mulroney.

 

 

Canada has had its current flag since 1965.

It was less than a year after my mother immigrated, and she still has the little flag pin that she was given at school.

  • Love 9
Link to comment
5 minutes ago, secnarf said:

Canada has had its current flag since 1965.

It was less than a year after my mother immigrated, and she still has the little flag pin that she was given at school.

Yes, the maple leaf flag was adopted in the 60's, so still pretty recent! Prior to that, Canada used some sort of variation that incorporated the the British flag. Canada is a relative young'un compared to other Western nations.

  • Love 2
Link to comment
On 11/20/2020 at 12:40 AM, 3 is enough said:

Small nitpick, but during the opening sequence when they were showing the various Commonwealth nations while the Queen was giving her speech they omitted Canada.  Pissed this Canadian off.

 

They also left out Ireland, which in 1947 was still part of the Commonwealth (we left in 1949.)

  • Useful 3
  • Love 6
Link to comment

As a minor thing, I do wonder how long the show is going to extend Martin's tenure as private secretary (in reality he retired in 1977, now he's logged almost a full decade of additional service on the show).

  • Useful 3
  • LOL 12
Link to comment
On 11/16/2020 at 7:45 PM, Ellaria Sand said:

Finally, an episode that shows the true nature of Margaret Thatcher. Her pompous bearing in her conversation with the Queen was infuriating.

 

On 11/17/2020 at 12:29 PM, WatchrTina said:

I think I may be becoming an honorary British Monarchist because the scene of Thatcher repeatedly interrupting the QUEEN was just INFURIATING.  

Whatever awfulness Thatcher embodied, as shown here or in real life, I side with her in that this discussion with the Queen. Thatcher was right. The Queen was wrong. Policy - even wrong or racist policy - was Thatcher's exclusive domain. The Queen, by her own strenuous argument to Charles (who echoed those comments back to his siblings in the "cunty" discussion), must not express opinions on policy. "No one wants to here them" apparently applied only to Charles, and not to her. The Queen blatantly violated that rule, lied about her blatant violation, and then threw her loyal, long-serving and apparently talented writer-press person under the bus with no apparent concern or remorse. Lovely.

I also found that conversation infuriating, but not because Thatcher "repeatedly interrupted" the Queen, but because of the Queen's repeated efforts to interrupt Thatcher - which Thatcher appropriately rebuffed. If the Queen can't comply with one minor rule - keep your mouth shut - then no deference is she due and the entire enterprise will crumble. For all the minions of supplicants who curtsy before her and "ma'am" her to death in recognition of their place, the Queen did not know her place. Her place is smiling and waving as she cuts a ribbon at a new sewage treatment plant. Not pronouncing policy on critical foreign policy matters.

Edited by ahpny
  • Applause 1
  • Love 11
Link to comment
1 hour ago, ahpny said:

threw her loyal, long-serving and apparently talented writer-press person under the bus with no apparent concern or remorse. Lovely.

I liked the postscript that he became a bestselling author.

1 hour ago, ahpny said:

Not pronouncing policy on critical foreign policy matters.

The queen can advise the PM on anything. That's one of her duties. The problem here was that Elizabeth's opinions were made public.

  • Love 10
Link to comment
1 hour ago, ahpny said:

 

Whatever awfulness Thatcher embodied, as shown here or in real life, I side with her in that this discussion with the Queen. Thatcher was right. The Queen was wrong. Policy - even wrong or racist policy - was Thatcher's exclusive domain. The Queen, by her own strenuous argument to Charles (who echoed those comments back to his siblings in the "cunty" discussion), must not express opinions on policy. "No one wants to here them" apparently applied only to Charles, and not to her. The Queen blatantly violated that rule, lied about her blatant violation, and then threw her loyal, long-serving and apparently talented writer-press person under the bus with no apparent concern or remorse. Lovely.

I also found that conversation infuriating, but not because Thatcher "repeatedly interrupted" the Queen, but because of the Queen's repeated efforts to interrupt Thatcher - which Thatcher appropriately rebuffed. If the Queen can't comply with one minor rule - keep your mouth shut - then no deference is she due and the entire enterprise will crumble. For all the minions of supplicants who curtsy before her and "ma'am" her to death in recognition of their place, the Queen did not know her place. Her place is smiling and waving as she cuts a ribbon at a new sewage treatment plant. Not pronouncing policy on critical foreign policy matters.

You have misunderstood.  The Queen must not say her opinion in public, but her constitutional duty is "advice,  warn and encourage" in private.  That's way she meets the Prime Minister every week. 

  • Useful 3
  • Love 14
Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...