Jump to content

Type keyword(s) to search

Josh & Anna Smuggar: A Series of Unfortunate Events


  • Start Topic

Recommended Posts

Defense attorney Gelfand's fifth reason was the immediate deletion of one of the files.

He noted that the 33-minute video of child sexual abuse in question was sent to the trash 29 seconds in and deleted.

Gelfand said not all of the files were in the trash or computer and that Michele Bush claimed they were moved by remote access. "The forensic trail clearly answers that," Gelfand told jurors.

Finally, Gelfand had a sixth reason for the jurors.

Over a five-year period, he noted, on Josh Duggar's iPhone and Macbook, there was no forensic trace of child sexual abuse material being downloaded or viewed.

He noted that Fottrell said it could have been wiped clean, but there was no forensic evidence of that.

  • LOL 4
1 minute ago, Cinnabon said:

2 years ago 😥.

Ugh, I guess I just didn't want to think that we've been without her for that long.

The closing arguments, thanks @Lindsay Loo Hoo, kind of make me nervous.  Most of us (I would hope) know it's complete bullshit being thrown against the wall, but you never know who is on the jury.

On the other hand, if it's hung then that's another trials worth of cash out of JB's pocket.

  • Love 9
7 minutes ago, Jeanne222 said:

Thank you so much for all the trial data!

I've enjoyed doing it all for you. Now lets pray for a guilty verdict!

Gelfand continued, saying there was no reason for someone with access to the HP to stream videos instead of double-clicking on them.

He said the Linux logs were written over because Homeland Security Investigations waited six months.

Gelfand then claimed that Fottrell lied, noting the software he asked about and whether it was plugged into the internet didn't exist in 2019.

He added that the government played disturbing images and videos that didn't come off the device but from a thumb drive from Washington, DC, from other cases.

Gelfand then brought up that the government tried to pass off Tor as a bad thing, but it had been on the Macbook since 2017 and nothing bad was done with it.

  • Useful 2
  • Love 16
3 minutes ago, Lindsay Loo Hoo said:

He added that the government played disturbing images and videos that didn't come off the device but from a thumb drive from Washington, DC, from other cases.

I'm shocked this didn't get an objection.  He's out right calling them liars who manipulated evidence.  And yes, I've witnessed a closing argument be objected to, well at least in state court.

  • Useful 5
  • Love 5

Gelfand said the thumb drive with two documents and one Powerpoint was plugged into the HP computer and files were downloaded, but that there was no connection to Josh Duggar.

He also noted the Dell_One username, and said no Dell has been connected to Duggar. "Josh is a Mac guy," he said.

Gelfand then brought up uTorrent, Tor, VLC, and command lines, telling the jurors Bush said the Snap Store had no uTorrent option.

  • LOL 1
  • Love 3
20 minutes ago, crazy8s said:

Seriously??

Gelfand spoke for the defense for approximately 90 minutes. He reiterated all the points the defense has been making throughout the trial. Gelfand said the investigator in the case ignored other possible suspects because “they were so star struck about the possibility of prosecuting Josh Duggar.”

“So blinded by that focus that they refused to look for anything else,” Gelfand said. “Everything is on the line, the stakes don’t get any higher, we ask that you find him not guilty.”

He also repeated the word "router" 250,000 times. 

  • LOL 9
  • Love 4

Next, Gelfand noted that Josh Duggar used Transmission and BitTorrent on the Macbook from 2017 and that uTorrent was on the Linux.

He said someone decided to not use Transmission when Duggar knew how to use it.

Gelfand suggested next that the prosecution was starstruck, and that when they realized the house from the search warrant wasn't Josh Duggar's, they sent someone "laser-focused" on finding him at the car lot.

He said the government didn't look at anyone else and had "excuses for everything."

Starstruck, My Ass.

  • Love 9
1 minute ago, hathorlive said:

Gah.  This is why you always document the router settings.  And show screenshots that the router contains settings but no data. And it certainly does NOT capture data moving through it.

I don't think that this has anything to do with "router settings" or what routers actually do. Routers have been very big in the conspiracy theory world for the past year.

The defense is trusting that there is at least one conspiracy theorist on the jury, or at least one person who has vaguely heard someone mention something about "tampering with routers" and is unwilling to convict without "all the router information."

I agree that screen shots might have helped, but I don't know if a conspiracy theorist wouldn't have just thought that there was "other information" that wasn't shown.

  • Useful 8
Just now, ShowsILoveToHate said:

I swear, if this is another Casey Anthony verdict, I’ll scream. 😡

You're not alone, till this day im still pissed over that. 

Just now, Scout Finch said:

Isn't the prosecution supposed to do a second closing argument to rebut what the defense said in theirs?

No the rebuttal comes after the defense rest their case, then the prosecution has a 2nd chance, then closing arguments.

  • Love 9
5 hours ago, lascuba said:

He's doing that hyperspecific thing where he's stating the facts without giving his feelings on it. He's saying that the defense didn't show reasonable doubt, not that he thinks Josh is guilty.

Today he tweeted that he’s praying for justice and I’m gonna gamble that it means he thinks and hopes Josh will be found guilty.

there are things I don’t care for about Derrick but I think he’s been just great this week. 

  • Love 19

Gelfand said the only piece of evidence the government brought forth from May 13 was a single photo, that that was their "smoking gun."

He then turned to the evidence from May 15, when Josh said he was at the car lot and a customer said he would be there in 10 minutes.

10 minutes later, Gelfand noted, the child sexual abuse material was downloaded.

He added that the customer was expected to show up at any moment when that occurred.

  • Useful 7

Gelfand told the jurors if they agreed remote access was possible, that was reasonable doubt, and that the law demanded they return a verdict of not guilty.

He added that no one appreciated what they were about to do more than Josh Duggar.

"Everything is on the line," Gelfand said. "We ask that you find him not guilty."

  • Useful 1
Just now, Annb67 said:

I’m worried about this. The jury has been gone longer than I thought they’d be

Not really. It’s been an hour and a half. There’s procedures to do, a foreman to chose. They probably did order lunch and go over the instructions. Even when a verdict is reached, these a lot of paperwork and procedures after that. 

  • Useful 3
  • Love 17
1 minute ago, Annb67 said:

I’m worried about this. The jury has been gone longer than I thought they’d be

I'm not.  Deliberations take time when done correctly.  The jury was sent back to deliberate with instructions from the judge.  It takes time for the jury to read over those and read over the charges.  This needs to be done before any straw voting.  A jury who deliberates for 20 minutes is not a good jury.

  • Love 22
4 minutes ago, Annb67 said:

I’m worried about this. The jury has been gone longer than I thought they’d be

Folks, I have ONE federal court case where the jury came back within 40 minutes.  And I was told they went in, voted guilty, talked for a few minutes, and then did paperwork and all the other stuff.  If the jurors want to go over evidence, it may take a while.  You may have a foreperson that wants to be methodical. They may of had lunch first before discussing.

  • Useful 1
  • Love 16

Roberts then reminded the jurors of the Intel1988 password.

"Everyone has a password," he said, that they use as their signature password. He said Duggar used it for other accounts like his bank and electric accounts.

"How does that make sense?" he asked, asking why a hacker would download Linux to only benefit themselves using that signature password.

  • Love 12

Roberts continued, saying you can't unsee child sexual abuse material and that it hits "your gut and heart."

He added that James Fottrell is the person teaching the sort of courses Michele Bush takes.

He also refuted the defense's homeschooling comments about Duggar, noting that he was a "power user" of technology.

He told the jurors Gelfand wanted them to think Tor is normal, but that it allows someone to view CSAM or buy a child.

Roberts said the small partition size suggested it was for receiving and possessing the material, not storing it.

  • Useful 3
  • Love 11
58 minutes ago, merylinkid said:

This is why I think they KNOW he is guilty.   Right after the raid on the car lot, everything got put in Anna's name.   Or Anna and .... wait for it ... Travis Story's name.   So that if there was a judgment against Josh, nothing could be seized.   

Besides the car lot, I hope a forensic accountant decides to look at the ALL the Duggar assets.   There's more than few shenanigans going on (and not the usual bookkeeping tricks everyone uses to avoid paying taxes in the fine old American Tradition.)

I thought they started moving things out of Josh's name, way back in 2015. After the Ashley Madison scandal. 

  • Useful 1
  • Love 7
1 minute ago, Lindsay Loo Hoo said:

Roberts said the small partition size suggested it was for receiving and possessing the material, not storing it.

The term we use is "download and deleter" to refer to people who download CP, watch it, enjoy it, and then delete it off their machine.  Or think they deleted it off their machine.

  • Useful 8
  • Love 8
26 minutes ago, crazy8s said:

Seriously??

Gelfand spoke for the defense for approximately 90 minutes. He reiterated all the points the defense has been making throughout the trial. Gelfand said the investigator in the case ignored other possible suspects because “they were so star struck about the possibility of prosecuting Josh Duggar.”

“So blinded by that focus that they refused to look for anything else,” Gelfand said. “Everything is on the line, the stakes don’t get any higher, we ask that you find him not guilty.”

(blinks)

This is ....100% not what happened.

I know this, because, seemingly unlike this defense attorney, I read through the BitTorrent motion they wrote back in August which claimed that the BitTorrent search conducted by local cops and the federal government was unconstitutional in part because it was too sweeping and did not identify Josh Duggar or anyone else as a potential suspect prior to starting the investigation.

I now kinda regret that the defense couldn't introduce that motion into evidence. 

 

  • Love 10
Just now, starfire said:

If he is deemed guilty today, will sentencing be tomorrow?  I hope he goes directly to jail after sentencing and isn't given time to get his "affairs in order". 

From what I read on a separate forum, in serious federal cases like this one, the def is immediately placed in custody.

  • Useful 2
  • Love 8
3 minutes ago, starfire said:

If he is deemed guilty today, will sentencing be tomorrow?  I hope he goes directly to jail after sentencing and isn't given time to get his "affairs in order". 

Sentencing won't be until early next year, but he'll probably get his bail revoked and will be held in custody until sentencing.

Edited by absnow54
  • Useful 6
  • Love 10

Roberts added that Josh Duggar owned an HP and wasn't just a Mac guy.

He said Bush told them her purpose was to find remote hacking.

He added that it wasn't reasonable for a hacker to download a partition personal to Duggar on May 11 and that they wouldn't have known Covenant Eyes was on there.

As for the hat in the reflection of the computer on May 14, Roberts suggested the text from Duggar's phone about getting stuck at the car lot meant he was there when child sexual abuse material was downloaded.

"The bad stuff didn't happen when he wasn't there," he said.

A recording of Josh Duggar explaining peer-to-peer software was on the iPhone, laptop, and HP computer - the office computer - was played.

The recording of Duggar saying he didn't want to say if he was guilty or innocent was also played.

  • Useful 3
  • Love 13
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...