Jump to content

Type keyword(s) to search

Jessa, Ben and Their Brood: Making a (Diaper) Mountain out of a Mold House


Message added by Scarlett45

The Duggars post about politics on social media frequently, but these social media posts are not an invitation to discuss politics here in this forum. This rule extends to Duggar adjacent families, friends, associates etc. Such discussions are a violation of the Politics Policy. 

I understand with recent current events there may be a desire to discuss certain social media postings of those in the Duggar realm as they relate to politics- this is not the place for those discussions. If you believe someone has violated forum rules, report them, do not respond or engage.

  • Reply
  • Start Topic

Recommended Posts

On 8/10/2016 at 7:49 PM, Celia Rubenstein said:

I see Jinger and Jeremy are at it again. There is only a thin layer of fabric between their bare legs, for Christ sakes!!!! Their knees are almost touching.  Someone needs to turn the hose on these two sex fiends! 

Jim Bob needs to put a stop to these wicked displays of vulgarity.  I am being defrauded left and right by these two.

Aw, Spurge is enjoying uncle Jeremy and vice versa.  My heart is warm.  Maybe Jinger will luck out and Jeremy will be good at fatherhood.

  • Love 2
Link to comment
On 8/3/2016 at 9:48 AM, Vaysh said:

The homebirth obsession is a bit of a mystery. Michelle did have a few of them before her body stopped cooperating and seemed to prefer them to her hospital ones so maybe she yapped on about how woooonderful homebirth is where you won't have to interact with those evil, sinful doctors with their science and their university educations. Add Jill's "midwife"-training under rabid homebirth advocates with no common sense, Anna's multiple successful ones and you've got the perfect storm. I suppose in their minds a homebirth is always the best option and hospitals are the absolute last resort (see Jill's mulish refusal to go until she had no choice). Jessa's lack of proper pre-natal care fits in with this mindset too, I think. They don't need no stinkin' science, they're the Duggars and God is on their side. 

Overall there seem to be a lot of strange and fearbased notions about hospital births among the fundie homebirthers and a lot of the misconceptions are spread by the "midwives".

As I see it, the major point of all the "rules" are to keep the younger generations (notably, the generation that didn't CHOOSE this life, but were born into it) away from any non-Quiverfull influences.  

No teachers, coworkers, school friends, teamates, etc, to provide a glimpse of what life might be like outside the cult.  No doctors, nurses or hospitals is the next logical step.  A doctor might mention contraception to a 25-year old with 4 kids, who is feeling tired and discoraged. A nurse might mention that no one would ever need to know that you tracked your cycle to space out the babies.  A hospital might send in a counsellor to talk to a woman with post-partum depression.

They can not have that. To keep the cult alive, they have to keep the girls and young women brainwashed long enough to get them good and saddled down with a slew of kids. Then they can't leave. And will KEEP themselves brainwashed in order to believe that their lives are not miserable. (MeChelle??)

On 8/3/2016 at 3:21 PM, Lady Edith said:

This is an interesting article I found on the quiver full group and home births.  

http://religiondispatches.org/my-womb-for-ihisi-purposes-the-perils-of-unassisted-childbirth-in-the-quiverfull-movement/

That is some CRAZY shit.  I think the cult leaders love the crazy people who come up with really elaborate defenses of the stuff they do to keep the cult members in line...UNTIL the crazy people cause someone to die. Then they go "Oh, no, we never said that...(crazy lady) did!"

  • Love 11
Link to comment
49 minutes ago, queenanne said:

Aw, Spurge is enjoying uncle Jeremy and vice versa.  My heart is warm.  Maybe Jinger will luck out and Jeremy will be good at fatherhood.

Until he has to instill in the  kid that he/she is nothing but a filthy sinner who deserves to be wracked with guilt for every waking moment.

  • Love 10
Link to comment
On 8/10/2016 at 7:49 PM, Celia Rubenstein said:

I see Jinger and Jeremy are at it again. There is only a thin layer of fabric between their bare legs, for Christ sakes!!!! Their knees are almost touching.  Someone needs to turn the hose on these two sex fiends! 

Jim Bob needs to put a stop to these wicked displays of vulgarity.  I am being defrauded left and right by these two.

Did she place that shirt there strategically, or is it just a happy accident?  I don't know why I need to know, but I do.

  • Love 3
Link to comment
8 minutes ago, JoanArc said:

This is one she genuinely brought on herself. Maybe it'll jar her into realizing she's immodest.

 

nah

Perhaps it will teach her to stop being such a vapid selfie queen. The Internet is forever, Blessa! You think you can smite everyone by blocking them on your page, Chica, but you fail to realize that anyone can misuse your image. Same with those picture of your feet, girl...

  • Love 6
Link to comment

I understand the internet is forever and you're risking people taking your public photos for reasons that you wouldn't want them to, but that doesn't mean that she "brought it on herself." No one should have to worry that their innocent pictures are going to be taken for nefarious purposes, especially to advertise for porn. I feel bad for Jessa on this one. It's humiliating. 

  • Love 20
Link to comment
Quote

Yes, do lets blame the victim here.

0 guilt over the victim blaming. Sorrynotsorry.

 

Quote

Unless we buy into the Gothard/fundie idea that the very shape of the female body is immodest in and of itself, how is that picture of Jessa in any way so?

It's not, at all, but ask Jessa to recite the party line.

 

Edit: She'll sue them, of course. And win.

Edited by JoanArc
  • Love 8
Link to comment

Honestly, it wouldn't surprise me if Jessa was secretly flattered. She's a consummate narcissist and is probably loving the fact that they chose her over pregnant Jill or pregnant Anna. She still reigns supreme as the "hot" daughter.

  • Love 9
Link to comment
1 hour ago, CofCinci said:

How poetic that Jessa will sue "Pregnant Fuckbook" for using her likeness while her dirtbag brother is being sued for the same issue. 

Isn't it ironic? Lol

Perhaps it's spiteful or vindictive of me, but I'm kinda getting a giggle out of the whole thing. Anyone else, I would probably feel sympathy for, but not Princess Prickly Pear.

Edited by lulu69
  • Love 8
Link to comment

I don't really feel sorry for her either. That is why you have private facebook. Everyone knows the internet is forever and she is narcissistic enough to keep posting all those damn selfies.

Also, I don't think anyone in their right mind would think " Oh jessa duggar is a prostitute" because of that. Reasonable people think " oh they stole her picture and used it for a fetish site"

Regardless, they will sue and it will be fine. Would any of you feel bad if it was Lindsay Lohan or Chrissy Tiegan who had their pregnant fully clothed pics posted on that website? I wouldn't. They handle it legally and move on

She put it out there for the world to see. IDK, there have been way worse things that have happened to celebrities ( like the pic of  Rihannas face after being beaten by Chris Brown, naked pictures being straight up hacked from the icloud) , she doesnt get sympathy from me

Edited by yogi2014L
  • Love 6
Link to comment
On 8/12/2016 at 9:53 AM, Marigold said:

Oh, don't say that!

Ben is going to start a Jesus Fashion Line soon.  Hats and t shirts. "LICK" will be the theme. 

I like the "LICK" theme (rather than LLTK). Tribute to miracle baby Josie.

  • Love 3
Link to comment
10 minutes ago, DangerousMinds said:

I think mugshots are part of the public domain. But really, anything you post publicly is out there. 

I made a mistake- it wasn't her mugshot but picture evidence of her face after getting beat up by Chris Brown. The employee who released it was fired if I remember correctly. I've changed it in my post above :-) But yes mugshots are public domain- you are correct! Im not sure why I wrote mugshot, actually. I think the picture just looked like one and my brain misfired. :-)

Edited by yogi2014L
Link to comment

What I hope Jessa stops to think about is that her holy, perfect, Christ-like modesty is deemed worthy of a porn fetish site. I'm not saying anything about her selfies, or making any kind of moral comment about her. I think if she isn't suing, she should--I personally wouldn't find it embarrassing, but I would sue because I'm poor and if I'm not allowed to make money off of my face then neither is anyone else. My only point is that she continuously posts judgmental Bible verses and subjects the world to videos of her fundie-gangsta husband detailing our moral failures for us, but the reality of what she presents is a fairly typical, narcissistic young lady who is not more or less Christ-like than any other typical, narcissistic young lady on the internet.  

Edited by Aja
  • Love 5
Link to comment
40 minutes ago, Kokapetl said:

Jessa has the right to control the use of her image when it comes to commercial uses. I think her possible lawsuit is considerably more solid than Josh's Guy's. 

I agree.  While the guy still may have a solid case if it truly cost him business, Jessa's image was used without permission for the website's financial gain.  That's definitely a lawsuit there.  

  • Love 3
Link to comment
7 hours ago, CofCinci said:

How poetic that Jessa will sue "Pregnant Fuckbook" for using her likeness while her dirtbag brother is being sued for the same issue. 

Who said she's suing? Being in her little Duggar bubble, I doubt she's even aware of this. But yeah, the parallel to Smuggar's case is totes ironic. 

  • Love 1
Link to comment

Being that Jessa considers herself 'a public figure' and knows she has thousands of people following her social sites while she puts her selfies out there for public consumption is there a way to prevent the public from viewing or sharing them?  Does she think that only her fundie adoring followers are going to see her pics?  I would feel differently if 1. She didn't know her picture was being taken, 2. She didn't post the picture herself for everyone to see, and 3. She wasn't aware when she posted it that she had thousands of people she doesn't know looking at the very picture she posted.  It's like if she went on TV and dressed in whatever and then said only certain people are allowed to watch the show.  On the other hand maybe she could get whatever site is using her picture to take it down or whatever but it's not like she's going to be able to stop every single person in the public from viewing and or sharing the picture that she gave the public to view.    

I don't know if the issue is modesty or not, someone else may find an entirely different picture more alluring and pass it around, however being a 'public figure' or 'celebrity' she controls what she posts for public consumption.   

  • Love 7
Link to comment

She knows there are dissenters; she's banned me twice from her Instagram. She's a known deleter/blocker of comments that don't suck up to her (and both times, I didn't even comment on HER page). She knows well enough where to go to find the dissent and ban from THOSE followers. That's what she did with me...twice. But I doubt she is aware that her reach extends to THIS. That's why I don't think she's aware of it. Were any of US aware of it before yesterday? This pic is about a year old (judging from where she was in the pregnancy, maybe 5 months). The only way she is going to find out is if some leghumper sees it here or on FJ, where it apparently was first posted and IMs her. I suppose that's possible. Heck, maybe one of us, or a member of FJ, has already contacted her! I'm busy with the Olympics and work meetings, so I haven't had time to read there in some time. 

Link to comment
2 hours ago, Sew Sumi said:

Who said she's suing? Being in her little Duggar bubble, I doubt she's even aware of this. But yeah, the parallel to Smuggar's case is totes ironic. 

I speculated...to be fair I think she could win a lawsuit; it looks like a false endorsement since she is a public figure. I can't blame her if she tried.

To clarify my victim blaming - Jessa's fame-seeking when she was under 18 are entirely her parent' fault and responsibility. Once she hit 18...or, ok, 21, she has to own all of being a public figure, all of her public social media posting, etc. Fame comes with a dark side and a price. It's not all free money and Jesus kittens. This idiot used her public persona to try and normalize child molestation. World's tiniest violin time. Honestly, Jessa being caught looking at porn, making porn, or just approving of porn in general would shock me more than a porn site's sad catfishing.

  • Love 2
Link to comment
43 minutes ago, Sew Sumi said:

She knows there are dissenters; she's banned me twice from her Instagram. She's a known deleter/blocker of comments that don't suck up to her (and both times, I didn't even comment on HER page). She knows well enough where to go to find the dissent and ban from THOSE followers. That's what she did with me...twice. But I doubt she is aware that her reach extends to THIS. That's why I don't think she's aware of it. Were any of US aware of it before yesterday? This pic is about a year old (judging from where she was in the pregnancy, maybe 5 months). The only way she is going to find out is if some leghumper sees it here or on FJ, where it apparently was first posted and IMs her. I suppose that's possible. Heck, maybe one of us, or a member of FJ, has already contacted her! I'm busy with the Olympics and work meetings, so I haven't had time to read there in some time. 

Josh should have told her when he was prowling his usual sites. 

  • Love 4
Link to comment
6 minutes ago, JoanArc said:

I think it's crystal clear he doesn't fetishize pregnancy.

Reminds him of his mother.  He could have stumbled upon it by accident though while doing other searches.   Then of course there would be no way for him to tell her without outing himself.

  • Love 3
Link to comment

I don't think it's right to use other peoples' pictures, but really, internet users beware, this is not the day and age of Polaroid cameras anymore.

I'm guessing Jessa's pic was chosen because of what she spouts, more than how sexy or immodest her picture is.

  • Love 2
Link to comment

Jessa is a famewhore, period. As much as I dislike her for her vapid ways and idiotic, self-righteous posts, I absolutely do not believe she deserved to have her picture posted on a porn site.

The Duggar sisters are learning about foot fetishes and those who fetishize pregnancy. I think these girls lack an awareness; it's hard for me to remember because of their chronological age that they only really have the maturity of middle school girls who share everything. 

Hopefully, they don't know about it cuz Boob would have shut everyone down already.

Edited by Arwen Evenstar
  • Love 2
Link to comment

Jessa hasn't posted to IG for quite a while. I only know that because someone would have posted it here. Ben and Dreck have been fairly active lately. Jill? A post or two. I guess TLC is trying to rally the troops around the Duggarbot errr.... moneymaking husbands. With this rather calculated buildup, it looks like it's going to pimp the males, including Jeremy. I guess they have to in order to keep some interest. Then Jinger is courting and season finale, engaged! I don't think they can keep the wedding as under wraps as they did with Jill's (6 weeks, TLC threatened, IIRC). It will be a special, because they can't have an October wedding and air it in February Sweeps. Good luck to TLC if they try. Pictures will already be everywhere, because leghumpers love to share! 

  • Love 1
Link to comment
9 hours ago, Kokapetl said:

Ben coaches an inner city children's football team!

2ihowf5.png

I wonder if Jessa will take over the associated cheerleading squad and force them to wear sleeves and calf-length skirts. I'm picturing this:

Sbtbcheerleaders.png

Edited by Bitter Betty
Embed an attachment I couldn't earlier
  • Love 12
Link to comment
3 hours ago, louannems said:

Same ole TLC and Duggars.  Most of that were recaps of already shown content.

I'm completely worn out with the adoption thing.  They won't adopt a dog, much less a kid.

  • Love 8
Link to comment
On 8/16/2016 at 8:16 PM, Bitter Betty said:

I understand the internet is forever and you're risking people taking your public photos for reasons that you wouldn't want them to, but that doesn't mean that she "brought it on herself." No one should have to worry that their innocent pictures are going to be taken for nefarious purposes, especially to advertise for porn. I feel bad for Jessa on this one. It's humiliating. 

 

 

On 8/16/2016 at 7:59 PM, Vaysh said:

Yes, do lets blame the victim here. How on earth is it Jessa's fault that her pic was hijacked by some pervs? And I honestly don't see how a fully covered pregnancy belly is in any way immodest. We're not living in the 19th century anymore when women had to hide their pregnancies because it alluded to them having had sex at some point. Unless we buy into the Gothard/fundie idea that the very shape of the female body is immodest in and of itself, how is that picture of Jessa in any way so? She's fully clothed, just doing the usual hand behind your back pregnant pose that most women do; it's not like she's posing naked on the cover of Vanity Fair.

 

Well said, ladies. No way was this Jessa's fault. Certainly, she doesn't deserve this.

  • Love 5
Link to comment
5 hours ago, farmgal4 said:

I'm completely worn out with the adoption thing.  They won't adopt a dog, much less a kid.

I hope they don't adopt any more pets.  Pets don't seem to fare well at the Duggar households.

  • Love 8
Link to comment
Message added by Scarlett45

The Duggars post about politics on social media frequently, but these social media posts are not an invitation to discuss politics here in this forum. This rule extends to Duggar adjacent families, friends, associates etc. Such discussions are a violation of the Politics Policy. 

I understand with recent current events there may be a desire to discuss certain social media postings of those in the Duggar realm as they relate to politics- this is not the place for those discussions. If you believe someone has violated forum rules, report them, do not respond or engage.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...