Jump to content

Type keyword(s) to search

NFL Thread


  • Reply
  • Start Topic

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, mojoween said:

I just cannot believe that a guy with no prior broadcasting experience is getting vaulted to the number one spot.  What a slap in the face to people who have been doing it for years and years.

You mean like the the former player who was CBS' number 1 guy until they hired Romo?    Simms had no prior broadcast experience before they immediately stuck him in the #1 slot.   Same with Aikman over on Fox.    These guys aren't hired for their broadcast ability.    As long as they can speak intelligibly they get the job.    It's based on their standings as a player.   It's the same reason ESPN keeps hiring and firing former players of all sports.   Built in audience.   Once the audience appeal fades, unless they are really awesome, they are replaced with the new hot guy.    

  • Love 2
13 hours ago, merylinkid said:

You mean like the the former player who was CBS' number 1 guy until they hired Romo?    Simms had no prior broadcast experience before they immediately stuck him in the #1 slot.   Same with Aikman over on Fox.    These guys aren't hired for their broadcast ability.    As long as they can speak intelligibly they get the job.    It's based on their standings as a player.   It's the same reason ESPN keeps hiring and firing former players of all sports.   Built in audience.   Once the audience appeal fades, unless they are really awesome, they are replaced with the new hot guy.    

Simms went to ESPN in his first year post NFL.  Then after 1994 he went to NBC, as part of a 3-man booth for the final three years of the AFC era on NBC.  Not really much, but no one stuck him into a two-man booth right after he was done.

Personally, it is what it is and I'm okay with Phil being gone (though I would have been okay had he remained).  Just a bit surprising since Phil was an original (AFC era on CBS). While I think Romo should have been paired with a HC or someone else in his first year, he'll be okay.  He's with Nantz, and to be fair, I'd rather listen to Romo before making any negative (or positive) opinions about his calls

On 4/5/2017 at 8:04 AM, mojoween said:

You make sense.  However, I am not inclined to give Romo the benefit of the doubt under any circumstance so I can handwave what happened with Simms and Aikman even if Troy is a former Cowboy.  I'm not rational in the least.

I mean, I would rather watch 6,437 Peyton Manning commercials than one minute of Romo calling anything.

Just rejoice that he's going to be over on CBS where I will probably hear him call a lot of Pats games. It doesn't bother me as I have no real opinion of the man one way or the other.

On 4/7/2017 at 8:41 AM, Artsda said:

I kind of expected this since that NYTimes article.  Aaron Rodgers broke up with his GF. Maybe he can now mend things with his family.  

 http://www.tmz.com/2017/04/07/aaron-rodgers-olivia-munn-break-up/

 

I posted this elsewhere:

 

In the 3 seasons before Rodgers dated Olivia Munn, the Packers went:

34-13-1 during the regular season.

1-3 in the playoffs.

Rodgers was named league MVP once.


In the 3 seasons Rodgers dated Olivia Munn, the Packers went:

32-16 during the regular season.

4-3 in the playoffs, including 2 NFC Championship games.

Rodgers was named league MVP once.

Rodgers threw 3 hail mary's.

Rodgers was awarded the best play of the 2015 season.

Rodgers backed up his "R-E-L-A-X" statement after a 1-2 start to the 2014 season.

Rodgers backed up his "run the table" statement after a 4-6 start to the 2016 season.

Also, during their 3 years together, only 2 QBs won the Super Bowl: Tom Brady and Peyton Manning.

 

----

Maybe Munn is responsible for the family friction. Maybe not.

My speculative take: Rodgers got tired of his hangers-on brothers, and his parents sided with them. After all, Luke and Jordan's identities are wrapped up in football, even though neither took a snap in the NFL. Luke is an "NFL Insider" for CBS Sports and Jordan failed to catch on in the CFL and NFL, and now works for the SEC Network.

And Olivia, of course, sided with Rodgers. (Also: Let's not forget that Jordan Rodgers dated Olivia's best friend/trainer, who accused him of cheating on her.)

I also -- again, I'm speculating -- think  that Rodgers, through his relationship with Olivia and in living in West Hollywood the past few offseasons, became more liberal -- not exactly a liberal.

Of course, Rodgers played college football in the liberal city of Berkeley.

But his brothers and, apparently, his parents, seem to be more like Christian conservatives. (Both Luke and Jordan Rodgers wear  their Christianity on their sleeves, in contrast to their brother.)

In a 2-hour podcast last year with the HBO star Pete Holmes -- who barely knew who Rodgers was since he didn't follow football, something that Rodgers actually appreciated -- Rodgers expressed some frustration with some of the Christianity he was raised with, particularly toward the homophobic aspects. Now, yes, there have been gay rumors, but let's just ignore that and look at the fact that Rodgers has been living in West Hollywood, one of the gayest cities, the past few offseasons, and has been hobnobbing with Olivia Munn's Hollywood pals, which of course includes many gay people. (Jordan Rodgers, by the way, has a history of making anti-gay comments.)

While dating Munn, Rodgers also did "liberal" things like denouncing a Packer's fans anti-Muslim slur and golfing with President Obama (which was made possible through his friendship with astronaut Mark Kelly, the husband of Gabby Giffords.)

 

I'm just saying that this whole family feud is probably really complex.

And since it was Rodgers' entire family who made the feud public, rather than lie or say "no comment," I don't think the end of his relationship with Olivia will end hard feelings with his family anytime soon.

  • Love 6

Marshawn Lynch, James Harrison and other players are participating in the Pro Football Arm Wrestling Championship, which will be aired on CBS.  The event is taking place at the MGM Grand Casino in Las Vegas.  This is in violation of league rules about players participating in events at casinos.  The league is investigating.

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2702638-nfl-investigating-las-vegas-arm-wrestling-event-involving-marshawn-lynch-others?

Even worse than moving the Raiders to Las Vegas and still publically claiming to be anti-gambling is two of the richest owners, Kraft and Jones, being actively involved in owning in the rise of Daily fantasy, which is basically gambling, and the NFL as well actively promoting them too. 

Everyone blames Goodell as the face of the league, but lets not pretend the league owners are any better than him about this sort of things. 

  • Love 6

Yes that eli Manning story seems completely overblown.  Its based it seems on one line in an email where he asks a giants staff member to find two jersyes that ".......can pass as game worn".  Thats it, from the articles I have read, the only evidence he did anything wrong.  And you can interpret that one line in many ways.  And he likely never gave it another thought after he wrote that email. 

1 hour ago, mojoween said:

I am so beyond over Rob Gronkowski's idiocy and do not understand why he is celebrated for being a fool.

Yes I get in the scheme of things it's harmless but no one else would get away with that shit.  But it's him and it turns into "oh that's just Gronk being Gronk tee hee."  It's infuriating.

I'm a diehard Pats fan, but yeah, his shtick is getting old. I think he's a good-hearted guy, but someone needs to tell him he's aged out of that range where those types of antics are endearing. 

  • Love 2
2 hours ago, Ohwell said:

Rob Gronkowski is a fucking meathead.

For their sake, I kind of hope the whole "Gronkowskis are meatheads" (which is now the brand for the entire family) is a carefully calculated marketing plan.

Otherwise, we will be seeing him in the 2022 ESPN 30 For 30 documentary "Broke, Part II".

Edited by xaxat
  • Love 4
6 hours ago, BitterApple said:

I'm a diehard Pats fan, but yeah, his shtick is getting old. I think he's a good-hearted guy, but someone needs to tell him he's aged out of that range where those types of antics are endearing. 

Agreed. I think the best description of Gronk ever is the "patron saint of meatheads." That said, he's never been in trouble for drugs, violence, guns, etc, so while he's immature as hell, I can live with it. I wonder how long the Pats can/will though.

Quote

For their sake, I kind of hope the whole "Gronkowskis are meatheads" (which is now the brand for the entire family) is a carefully calculated marketing plan.

The article I linked above claims that Gronk lives off endorsement money and invests his salary, fwiw. I think it's somewhere in the middle--I do think he's a meathead, but I also think he plays it up for the media and isn't quite as dumb as the image he projects.

  • Love 3
9 hours ago, ganesh said:

How? He was in a cell by himself.

Exactly. OTOH, only God knows (and whomever was there).  It's a little odd that this would happen right after the non-guilty verdict for the double-murder as opposed to some other random time.  The man and the defense team were looking hopeful that they'd have a chance at winning an appeal.  Which they probably don't.  But maybe it goes from life to 25-to-life (plus the 4-5 years for whatever else).  Still a lot of time, but in the end, can't really bad since he doesn't get the benefit of the doubt.

Meanwhile, the other TE from that early 2010s era...well it's a complete 180 in terms of how one's life is fairing.  Totally have no issues with Gronk.  What a guy!

 

Can't wait for the schedules to be released tomorrow.  If you're San Francisco, you probably are hoping that the Pats don't host the Texans (I can't think of any other team that New England can host that would have the Niners travel on 5 days rest to the team that lost the NFL Opener).  Either way, maybe put someone else on MNF other than the 49ers for Week One's double on ESPN

49 minutes ago, stealinghome said:

Agreed. I think the best description of Gronk ever is the "patron saint of meatheads." That said, he's never been in trouble for drugs, violence, guns, etc, so while he's immature as hell, I can live with it. I wonder how long the Pats can/will though.

And apparently TO is the worst teammate ever because he flaps his gums and sometimes whined. Kap is also an alleged domestic terrorist because he kneeled during the anthem.

Eh, killed some dude driving drunk, whatevs. 

  • Love 1

After yesterday, it's nice to read about a retired NFL player who is doing positive things after his career by running for Congress.

Quote

This week, Colin Allred, a former NFL player and current civil-rights lawyer, announced that he plans to paint the Dallas suburbs blue next year.

“I was born and raised in this district by a single mother who taught in Dallas public schools for 27 years,” Allred, whose résumé includes stints with the Tennessee Titans and Obama-era Housing department, told the Dallas Morning News Wednesday. “This community — my mom, my teachers, and my coaches — gave me the opportunity to succeed, play in the NFL, become a civil-rights attorney, and work for President Obama. I want to make sure future generations have the same opportunities and to make sure those values are being represented in D.C.”

Edited by xaxat
  • Love 10
12 hours ago, Silver Raven said:

So I'm now seeing that, because of the state law which overturns his convictions if he died during appeal, the Patriots owe his estate all of his back pay and bonuses.  And the victim's family may sue the Patriots to keep that from happening.

I have a feeling this is going to get really messy. If the conviction is vacated, are the Pats automatically liable to pay out the bonus money? Or can they fight it? For someone on Kraft's level of wealth it would almost make more sense to just pay it and be done with the whole mess, but who knows.

I'm still wondering why he chose to off himself. People are saying he did it to set his daughter up for life, but I don't buy that. Hernandez was a selfish, narcissistic prick. If he cared so much about his child he wouldn't have been living a wannabe gangsta life in the first place. I'm 50/50 on his death being a set-up by gang members, guards or whoever.

  • Love 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...