iwasish February 24, 2017 Share February 24, 2017 1 hour ago, Maya said: That box on her head!!! Lol maybe she had McDonald's for lunch? 1 Link to comment
kokapetl February 24, 2017 Share February 24, 2017 (edited) 5 hours ago, Maya said: That box on her head!!! Lol It's 6.5 x 4.5 x 2". 4 hours ago, Humbugged said: Bella had packing tape in her hair instead of a ribbon and some of the models had trash bags (with trash) as outfits I think I saw a model with a plunger hat. ETA. It was a feather duster hat Edited February 24, 2017 by Kokapetl 1 Link to comment
ginger90 February 24, 2017 Share February 24, 2017 The one with the garbage looks like a kindergarten recycling event. 4 Link to comment
Humbugged February 24, 2017 Author Share February 24, 2017 (edited) 2 hours ago, ginger90 said: The one with the garbage looks like a kindergarten recycling event. Apparently that was Jeremy Scott's point but he was probably off his face as well - his collections are always barking mad (remember the human barbie dolls) http://nypost.com/2017/02/24/kendall-jenner-wears-cardboard-courture-in-moschino-show/ Quote In Jeremy Scott’s world, one woman’s trash is another’s couture gown. On the second night of Milan fashion week, Scott unveiled his latest collection for Moschino. The theme? “Cardbord Couture,” according to the designer’s shownotes. Supermodels Kendall Jenner, Gigi Hadid and Bella Hadid stormed the runway (which was cleverly crafted from taped-up cardboard boxes) in a plethora of high-low looks borrowed from what one could imagine Oscar the Grouch’s girlfriend would wear: a black garbage bag imagined as cocktail frock (with a garbage lid as a hat), clear bubble wrap disguised as a party dress, and a plastic lace gown topped with a chandelier tiara. In the end, Scott walked the runway in a T-shirt that declared: “Couture is an attitude. It’s not a price point.” Translation: It’s not what you wear, but how you wear it. Even if it means swathing yourself in a shower curtain for a cheeky ballgown moment. Versace Edited February 24, 2017 by Humbugged Link to comment
Coffeecup February 24, 2017 Share February 24, 2017 Are these fashion designers just trolling the public? Most of those outfits look like bad jokes. I realize that runway design sample clothes are supposed to be somewhat extreme, and that they're toned down for manufacture and sale to the public, but still... that stuff looks like shit. 11 Link to comment
kokapetl February 25, 2017 Share February 25, 2017 (edited) Here's Gigi's and Bella's Moschino Looks Squashed box hat Versace: Fendi: Edited February 25, 2017 by Kokapetl Link to comment
toolazy February 25, 2017 Share February 25, 2017 12 hours ago, Humbugged said: Bella had packing tape in her hair instead of a ribbon and some of the models had trash bags (with trash) as outfits Now life is imitating Zoolander. Great. 4 Link to comment
Marley February 25, 2017 Share February 25, 2017 I think Fendi looks awesome. The rest is idiotic. Jeremy Scott seems like a pretentious prick. 3 Link to comment
kokapetl February 25, 2017 Share February 25, 2017 4 hours ago, Humbugged said: Bottega Veneta Sometimes she looks a bit Vulcan. 2 Link to comment
Frost February 25, 2017 Share February 25, 2017 21 hours ago, Humbugged said: In the end, Scott walked the runway in a T-shirt that declared: “Couture is an attitude. It’s not a price point.” Unless he's actually selling his clothes for $3.99 he's full of BS. 10 Link to comment
iwasish February 25, 2017 Share February 25, 2017 Maybe he and Kanye can partner up. Two pretentious asses. 8 Link to comment
Shangrilala February 25, 2017 Share February 25, 2017 The model with the feather duster is really unattractive. I can't decide what I think about Fendi. It stands out, but I'm not sure if its in a good way or not. Anna Sui is still my favorite look. Gigi looks practically emaciated. Has she aleays been that skinny??? 1 Link to comment
BitterApple February 25, 2017 Share February 25, 2017 GiGi looks horrible. She's starving herself into oblivion to fight her natural body type and it's aging her face by twenty years. Kendall looks like she's been hitting up the Botox, the lifted outer corners of the brows are a dead giveaway. 2 Link to comment
Lemons February 25, 2017 Share February 25, 2017 (edited) 35 minutes ago, Shangrilala said: The model with the feather duster is really unattractive. I can't decide what I think about Fendi. It stands out, but I'm not sure if its in a good way or not. Anna Sui is still my favorite look. Gigi looks practically emaciated. Has she aleays been that skinny??? None of the girls shown above are pretty, most of them are unique looking enough to make the clothes look good. I love fendi. Versace has some good looks too, understated. I even like the shows that show unwearable clothes, makes a good show. Edited February 25, 2017 by Lemons Link to comment
Jack Shaftoe February 26, 2017 Share February 26, 2017 Quote Supermodels Kendall Jenner, Gigi Hadid and Bella Hadid... If those three are supermodels, I am Superman. 2 Link to comment
Jeanius February 26, 2017 Share February 26, 2017 LOLOL!!! These "fashuns!!!" If the designers had a sense of humor, they'd be laughing all the way to the bank. Sadly, most of them take themselves Dead Serious because, you know, Important. Trash couture. Cardboard clothing. Didn't Kimmee say she didn't like touching cardboard? Invite her to model the 100% recycled cardboard crap. And buy some for her "everyday" life. Wear once, recycle!! Great way to rehab her public image. A LOT of these clothes makes the young ladies look So. Old. I thought GiGi was YoYo for a hot minute. Bella is scary looking. Halloween-like. Honestly, Kendall looks the most "model-like?" Some times. Other times, she looks like a generic "pretty" brunette. Maybe that's what They want. Makes me want to riffle through the recycle bag and grab a hot glue gun and whip up a bunch of Haute Couture. For my Booteek 1 Link to comment
GaT February 28, 2017 Share February 28, 2017 1 hour ago, Almost 3000 said: Lucy and Ethel in Paris... OMG, you're right! 9 Link to comment
Bucwild February 28, 2017 Share February 28, 2017 I always thought Bella looked old for her age, and now Gigi does too because of what the weight loss did to her face. Does anybody here think Bella, Gigi, and Kendall could've made it as models if they were just regular girls? Link to comment
iwasish February 28, 2017 Share February 28, 2017 54 minutes ago, Bucwild said: I always thought Bella looked old for her age, and now Gigi does too because of what the weight loss did to her face. Does anybody here think Bella, Gigi, and Kendall could've made it as models if they were just regular girls? I can see Kendall being recruited. She has the height, body type and the type of face that can be morphed into many looks via make up and hairstyle. I don't think she's by any means a super model contender, that's all due to the hype of her name and family connection, but I do think she would have had a decent career. The other two? Meh. Link to comment
Bucwild February 28, 2017 Share February 28, 2017 (edited) Bella with her current face and Kendall at the most would've been a basic filler model without their connections. Gigi with her bloated, puffy face wouldn't have made it as model. Edited February 28, 2017 by Bucwild 2 Link to comment
kokapetl March 1, 2017 Share March 1, 2017 Gigi was signed by IMG before her mother was a Real Housewife. She photographs well. Kendall and Bella can't manage much beyond a dead eyed stare, I don't think they'd get much interest if they didn't appear on tv shows. 2 Link to comment
KatWay March 1, 2017 Share March 1, 2017 Gigi before last year got criticism though because she was a lot curvier than everybody else on the runway, so much that she didn't fit the designers' standard measurements and had to wear loose-fitting stuff sometimes. So how did she still get booked everywhere despite being healthy fit insteady of super thin? Guess. Poor Barbara Palvin had to rebrand herself as a plus size model when she gained five pounds and was dropped everywhere. Not to mention Gigi's runway walk used to be atrocious and has only now graduated to serviceable. She even said she was "learning on the job", without reflecting that maybe normal models aren't given that same option. If you can't walk, you don't. Maybe Yolanda's fame didn't help her but her connections and daddy's money certainly did. I think she photographs well but only because she's got good bone structure and an interesting face, aside from the cheeks (which can be photoshopped very easily / don't have to be now that she's lost so much weight). Her eyes are as dead as Kendall's or Bella's IMO, it's just that they also can't manage a facial expression more often than not and their faces need some movement to look interesting. Mainly it annoys me when you put them next to some really talented models like Liu Wen or Joan Smalls, they just look like amateurs and yet get 100x the attention all because they're connected to the right people and hang with the celebrity crowd. 4 Link to comment
BitterApple March 2, 2017 Share March 2, 2017 On 2/28/2017 at 6:09 AM, Bucwild said: I always thought Bella looked old for her age, and now Gigi does too because of what the weight loss did to her face. Does anybody here think Bella, Gigi, and Kendall could've made it as models if they were just regular girls? GiGi yes, Bella and Kendall no. 5 Link to comment
GaT March 2, 2017 Share March 2, 2017 Not to derail the thread, but just to add to a previous discussion about photoshopping that started here with this post about the Vogue cover with Kendall & a bunch of other models. These are unphotoshopped pictures of Ashley Graham on a recent shoot. It shows exactly how much "fixing" Vogue did on the cover, & I bet they did a ton of it on the other models too. 4 Link to comment
Artsda March 2, 2017 Share March 2, 2017 2 hours ago, BitterApple said: On 2/28/2017 at 9:09 AM, Bucwild said: Does anybody here think Bella, Gigi, and Kendall could've made it as models if they were just regular girls? Can't this be said about all the latest models coming up these days? Practically all the latest models have famous parents. Kaia Gerber? Georgia Jagger? Hailey & Ireland Baldwin? Corrine Fox? Sofia Ritchie? Delilah Belle Hamlin? Sailor Brinkley? Destry Speilberg? Link to comment
Jack Shaftoe March 2, 2017 Share March 2, 2017 (edited) Quote Can't this be said about all the latest models coming up these days? Practically all the latest models have famous parents. No, these are just the models the media prefer to talk about because "daughter of celebrity X walks the runway" is a more eye-catching headline than "Model whose name few outside of the fashion world have heard walks the runway". For example, the only models with famous parents in the latest Victoria's Secret Fashion Show were Kendall, Gigi and Bella. The nepotism trend in fashion is annoying, no doubt, but the vast majority of successful models are not children of celebrities. Edited March 2, 2017 by Jack Shaftoe 1 Link to comment
DangerousMinds March 3, 2017 Share March 3, 2017 23 hours ago, BitterApple said: GiGi yes, Bella and Kendall no. I agree. Kendall can't hold a candle to Gigi, IMO. 1 Link to comment
kokapetl March 4, 2017 Share March 4, 2017 11 minutes ago, Artsda said: Balmain: That's not simply gold lipstick, its tooth chipping lip grillz Link to comment
GaT March 4, 2017 Share March 4, 2017 10 minutes ago, Kokapetl said: That's not simply gold lipstick, its tooth chipping lip grillz And now we know why Kimmy has been walking around with the lip ring. 2 Link to comment
iwasish March 4, 2017 Share March 4, 2017 24 minutes ago, GaT said: And now we know why Kimmy has been walking around with the lip ring. You didn't think she thought of the lip ring all on her own did you? 4 Link to comment
Coffeecup March 4, 2017 Share March 4, 2017 (edited) On 3/2/2017 at 0:13 AM, Artsda said: Can't this be said about all the latest models coming up these days? Practically all the latest models have famous parents. Kaia Gerber? Georgia Jagger? Hailey & Ireland Baldwin? Corrine Fox? Sofia Ritchie? Delilah Belle Hamlin? Sailor Brinkley? Destry Speilberg? Another celebrity model: Michael Jackson's daughter Paris Jackson just signed a modeling contract with IMG Models (same company that handles the Hadid sisters and other well-known models). http://www.usatoday.com/story/life/entertainthis/2017/03/03/paris-jackson-signs-with-img-models/98682872/ Paris is really beautiful, much better looking than the Hadids and Kendall. Little nitpick here: I think she looks more striking with her natural dark hair than the blonde hair she's currently wearing. Edited March 4, 2017 by Coffeecup 1 Link to comment
iwasish March 4, 2017 Share March 4, 2017 9 minutes ago, Coffeecup said: Another celebrity model: Michael Jackson's daughter Paris Jackson just signed a modeling contract with IMG Models (same company that handles the Hadid sisters and other well-known models). http://www.usatoday.com/story/life/entertainthis/2017/03/03/paris-jackson-signs-with-img-models/98682872/ Paris is really beautiful, much better looking than the Hadids and Kendall. Little nitpick here: I think she looks more striking with her natural dark hair than the blonde hair she's currently wearing. I don't think Paris is wrapped all that tight. The modeling life can be stressful, as Kendall complains about it all the time, might not be a wise choice for a fragile girl. 4 Link to comment
GaT March 4, 2017 Share March 4, 2017 1 hour ago, Coffeecup said: Another celebrity model: Michael Jackson's daughter Paris Jackson just signed a modeling contract with IMG Models (same company that handles the Hadid sisters and other well-known models). http://www.usatoday.com/story/life/entertainthis/2017/03/03/paris-jackson-signs-with-img-models/98682872/ Paris is really beautiful, much better looking than the Hadids and Kendall. Little nitpick here: I think she looks more striking with her natural dark hair than the blonde hair she's currently wearing. I agree. She got those amazing eyes from her mother, & they look so much better with dark hair. I don't like her bleached hair at all. 1 Link to comment
kokapetl March 8, 2017 Share March 8, 2017 (edited) Kendall walked Chanel As did the Hadids And then: Edited March 8, 2017 by Kokapetl Link to comment
Artsda March 9, 2017 Share March 9, 2017 Kendall Jenner, Bella Hadid and More of Fashion's Finest Come Together for a Powerful International Women's Day Video Link to comment
carrier76 March 9, 2017 Share March 9, 2017 I personally think Kendall is very pretty and modelesque. I don't trash her because of who her family is. She draws me into a picture for sure. Bella Hadid, however, I think is pure nepotism. Different strokes, I guess. 3 Link to comment
Frost March 10, 2017 Share March 10, 2017 In those Chanel photos, I thought Kendall outshone both Gigi and Bella. Maybe it was a lucky photo or maybe Kendall is suited to Chanel's design aesthetic, but I think she looks beautiful. Those boots however looked equally ugly on everybody! 4 Link to comment
Pogojoco March 13, 2017 Share March 13, 2017 Lorenzo, from Tom and Lorenzo, had this to say about Kendall last fall and he articulated what I also suspect: Kendall without her name would be a filler model. Every fashion show has like, 30 looks, and there are a bunch in the middle that don't open or close. She'd be one of those. She's tall enough and thin enough, and she's certainly pretty but she's not a great model and she's not a great walker. She gets the cover of Vogue because of her name. Lorenzo said in their podcast (PopStyle Opinionfest) that he has seen Kendall a lot at New York Fashion Week. They see so many shows and fashion people look at the clothes and not the girls. He said he can tell the really premier girls because they have a very distinctive walk or way of working the clothes and he gave Karlie Kloss as an example. He knows it's Karlie Kloss just by her walk. He said he'll see Kendall walk and only notice because people around him might make some noise and he'll look up at her face, but not because of anything she is doing on the runway. 5 Link to comment
toolazy March 14, 2017 Share March 14, 2017 That's all well and good but it's also the case that most of us that post here couldn't be any kind of model anywhere ever. So Kendall is only fair-to-middling talented. Who cares? She still the only one of that whole bunch who works outside of the family businesses. She's the only one with a real job. Given the things that are happening in this country right now I just don't have any outrage left to spend on whether or not Kendall is profiting off of her name. 5 Link to comment
GaT March 14, 2017 Share March 14, 2017 5 hours ago, Pogojoco said: Lorenzo, from Tom and Lorenzo, had this to say about Kendall last fall and he articulated what I also suspect: Kendall without her name would be a filler model. Every fashion show has like, 30 looks, and there are a bunch in the middle that don't open or close. She'd be one of those. She's tall enough and thin enough, and she's certainly pretty but she's not a great model and she's not a great walker. She gets the cover of Vogue because of her name. 3 hours ago, toolazy said: That's all well and good but it's also the case that most of us that post here couldn't be any kind of model anywhere ever. So Kendall is only fair-to-middling talented. Who cares? She still the only one of that whole bunch who works outside of the family businesses. The real reason Kendall is used up front so much is because she has 70M IG followers. Social media presence is now a huge part of how successful a model is nowadays, & Kendall delivers. Of course, the reason she has so many followers is because she's part of the Kardashian/Jenner family & she takes advantage of it. She is not working outside of the family business, she's expanding it. 5 Link to comment
GaT March 19, 2017 Share March 19, 2017 Does this sound like Kardashian spin to anyone else? Kendall Jenner Robbery, Another Security Guard Bites the Dust Quote It appears the fam is upset because when Kendall left for an hour around midnight, someone who was not an invited guest got inside the house. So the door alarm that went off while Kendall was still in the house, & which she ignored was what? 2 Link to comment
kokapetl March 19, 2017 Share March 19, 2017 4 hours ago, GaT said: Does this sound like Kardashian spin to anyone else? Kendall Jenner Robbery, Another Security Guard Bites the Dust So the door alarm that went off while Kendall was still in the house, & which she ignored was what? So the thief was a party guest inside Kendall's house, Kendall was home, heard the alarm, ignored it, plus the security guard was posted outside? Will her insurance rates go up? Link to comment
Artsda March 19, 2017 Share March 19, 2017 The insurance company should give this entire family the highest rate they have. 1 Link to comment
GaT March 29, 2017 Share March 29, 2017 Kendall is no Marilyn Monroe, not even close. 2 Link to comment
Shangrilala March 29, 2017 Share March 29, 2017 Ugh. No she is not. What an odd choice for Marilyn. She looks like she is playing dress up, pretend models. 2 Link to comment
Frost March 30, 2017 Share March 30, 2017 If you gave me 100 guesses, I would never have come up with Marilyn Monroe. Winona Ryder, maybe. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.