All Episodes Talk: All Rise

[AngelaHunter]

2 hours ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

Bad Wedding DJ-Woman's DJ played wrong songs, or started song 15 seconds late, and she's devastated. 

OH gawd. California unicorn-snowflake, spoiled Bridezilla's wedding was totally ruined because, well, those 15 seconds meant everything to her. Stupid heifer and her stupid mommy yakking about cookies or whatever. Oh, STFU, all of you. So sweet how bridegroom, Goofy, hugged his large Bridezilla in the hall as she wept bitter tears for her devastation from which she will never recover. NEVER! Gee, at my wedding the DJ played the wrong song for our first dance, and we hadn't even bartered cookies for his services! I was totally destroyed, I tell you, and I've never been the same. Whenever anyone mentions my wedding, tears begin to squirt out of my eyeballs.

More wedding nonsense. Parents suing the ex-bride of their douche-y, hipster son, Dakota, for the cost of the wedding.  Dakota and his blushing bride wed in November and split in January. No one told them that after the big, showy wedding that all this grown-up living stuff was going to be so hard and all, I guess. "White lace and promises... a kiss for luck and we're on our way (to divorce court)." Haha. You all STFU too.

Child support kerfuffle: Those two ladies sure know how to pick 'em. Their wee deadbeat sits there mute and lets his big girls battle it out. What does he care? According to his ex-girlfriend/baby momma, he doesn't even work, so she can whistle for the 15K in child support, some of which was coming from the plaintiff's paycheck. But hey, they both wanted him. They got him.

[Hellohappylife]

That wedding DJ bride was just completely annoying. She had to have 15 seconds of “awkward” silence? How tragic it must have been for her to stand there surrounded by family & friends with no music playing. 

The venue from that clip sounded like it was close to a highway, It looked like a restaurant that was busy. You could see random people who aren’t even part of the wedding walking around in the back. 

Her crying halter view comment “  now when people ask me about my wedding day,I just think of the DJ & how it was ruined” 

Girl,no one is asking about your wedding day. No one cares that much. Your princess day is over,find a new Pinterest hobby to create.

[Spunkygal]

4 minutes ago, Hellohappylife said:

That wedding DJ bride was just completely annoying. She had to have 15 seconds of “awkward” silence? How tragic it must have been for her to stand there surrounded by family & friends with no music playing. 

The venue from that clip sounded like it was close to a highway, It looked like a restaurant that was busy. You could see random people who aren’t even part of the wedding walking around in the back. 

Her crying halter view comment “  now when people ask me about my wedding day,I just think of the DJ & how it was ruined” 

Girl,no one is asking about your wedding day. No one cares that much. Your princess day is over,find a new Pinterest hobby to create.

When bridezilla was complaining about the extra 15 seconds that they had to wait after their kiss, I was hoping JJ would shout out “Then you should have grabbed him for another kiss!”

[ButYourHonor]

I don’t care about the legalities of the case, I wanted to bitch-slap the smug defendant in the watch repair case.  He also lied in the halter-view, saying he couldn’t leave the watch with the same guy who had “screwed it up twice before”.  Twice?  What twice?  You brought it to him once for a battery, and then for this.

[Florinaldo]

3 hours ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

Short Marriage, Long Debt-After a two month marriage, the groom's parents want the venue cost back, and a loan repaid to pay the ex-wife's debt off.

I guess the parents thought that marriages come with a money-back guarantee if things do not work out between the spouses.

As much as I think it is a silly tradition to expect the bride's family to pay for this and the groom's family to shell out for that, as soon as they decided to pay for it as a gift, they had to kiss the money goodbye. I did not find their story believable that the kids agreed from the start to repay them, but they rightfully got back their loan to the bride for paying her debts.

3 hours ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

Bad Wedding DJ-Woman's DJ played wrong songs,

What a bloody drama queen!! If a few wrong songs being played at her wedding are enough to cause her to sob like that and experience anguished flashbacks, she is in for a lifetime of despair at the slightest annoyance. She seemed like a close copy of her mother, who was very actively prompting her at every turn. The groom is in for a lively marriage with these two harpies breathing down his neck and watching his every move.

Too bad the DJ offered to give back the gratuity and JJ held him to his word. A tip is a tip; once given, it's an acknowledgement of satisfaction for services rendered and it's gone.

4 hours ago, DoctorK said:

I am scratching my head over the watch repair case today.

I had exactly the same reaction. I thought that JJ may have seen some info in the file that prompted her to react that way, perhaps because of past bad experiences with jewellers; or it was another case of arbitrary disliking a litigant; or (my usual default explanation with her) she missed her scheduled bowel movement that morning.

The jeweller should have been given the opportunity to correct the situation, despite the (no doubt very pretentious) wife capriciously not wanting to let him touch her trophy watch again.

Edited October 31, 2018 by Florinaldo

[AngelaHunter]

1 hour ago, Florinaldo said:

As much as I think it is a silly tradition to expect the bride's family to pay for this and the groom's family to shell out for that

I think it is too, especially for mature couples who are both working and living together and want an extravaganza but can't afford it. This goes back to olden times, when parents were so thrilled that some guy was taking their spinster daughter/burden off their hands, they would pay for it all, plus throw in a dowry to boot. "Here, take her. She's your problem now." And parents of the bride are still expected to pay for almost everything, even though their daughters aren't forced to sit home, forbidden to move out or get jobs and just had to wait to "catch" a man. So many women shrieking for equality, so how about this: You and your betrothed pay for your own wedding and your parents can make a gift of whatever they want or are able to do - not have to mortgage their houses. If you can't afford a wedding to rival those of royalty or Celine Dion, scale it down. There. All equal now. JMH(and probably very unpopular)O.

[Brattinella]

13 minutes ago, AngelaHunter said:

You and your betrothed pay for your own wedding and your parents can make a gift of whatever they want or are able to do - not have to mortgage their houses. If you can't afford a wedding to rival those of royalty or Celine Dion, scale it down. There. All equal now. JMH(and probably very unpopular)O.

My one and only wedding was a hook-on to his sister's wedding, a two-fer.  The brides were escorted to the outside venue by way of a horse-drawn wagon.  We were wed under a homemade bower, and all 4 of us said our vows.  Our only expense was my bouquet (I already had a suitable off-shoulder gown) and hotel room.  We probably would never have been married if we had had to pay for it.   I would have had a happier life, too.

[jilliannatalia]

6 hours ago, Spunkygal said:

Ok, I am trying to turn over a new leaf and not be overly critical of people BUT in the wedding DJ case, there is no way I would have hired that guy as my DJ. Aren’t DJs supposed to keep the energy up at a reception and mix in some current tunes with older ones? He looked almost as old as I am (61) and didn’t look fun or energetic. I guess that’s what you get with whatever crazy barter thing the P’s mom had going on.

I shouldn't be so judgmental in regard to an aspect of a person's appearance over which he has little or no control (though I will [be judhmental] because it's one of the things I do best).  The DJ's lips had the stretchy appearance of a denture-wearer going dentally au naturel, yet he appeared to have all or at least the majority of his teeth in place, or he was at least wearing his dentures. I've never seen the stretchy lip look with in someone not missing so many teach that the gums are in contact with one another.  I was baffled by the look.

Now God will probably make my teeth fall out for my unkind comments, but I have a brother-in-law who is a dentist and a cousin who is an oral surgeoun, and they will be obligated to provide my implants at cost. My toothless and stretchy-lipped look will be temporary. Maybe botox will help. 

[jilliannatalia]

5 hours ago, Brattinella said:

Yeah, about that cookie thing.  She called her cookies Oreos at least three times.  I know she doctors them up somehow but she still calls them Oreos.  She sells them at a big profit.  Isn't that a little deceitful?

 

But she made a freaking 1,200 of them. How many times did she tell us that?  At the price she was charging, the ghost of Van Gogh must have been helping her with the design.

On 10/29/2018 at 4:24 PM, Brattinella said:

Cell-phone Mom was bound and determined NOT to pay for that phone.  She really wanted to focus on those bad old police, instead of Junior's misbehavior.

Those evil police. the parents never conceded nor even seemed to contemplate the possibility that Stachen's( or whatever his Scrabble-letter name was*) might not have relayed the information concerning the questioning with 100% accuracy, whether intentionally or not.

Did anyone catch from where this case originated? I thought I might have heard Oakland, CA, but I also may have confused it with another case. If it was in CA, law enforcement here CAN question a minor without the presence of his parents, though  if he asks for his parents and law enforcement continues uestioning without finding them, anything he says will probably be thrown out by a judge. In any event the police really should have recorded the interrogation unless it was extremely informal. i would guess that either thekid had been in trouble previously or the law enforcement present was a school resource officer of some sort. i don't know that, though.

I do get tired of JJ treating every case [unless she's treating it as though the only pertinent law is The Law as It Stands in the Mind of Judith Scheindlin] as though the applicable laws are indeed those of the State of New York. (If this case happened to have originated in the State of New York, I'll  channel  Roseanne Rosannadanna and say, "Never mind.")

On 10/29/2018 at 4:48 PM, AngelaHunter said:

"Statchin"(??) was very cute and very well-spoken - much more so than many adults we see here. It's a damned shame this generation is being taught by their parents that it doesn't matter what they do. Just blame everything on someone else and never ever take responsibility for anything. Again, we have parents who know precisely what happened, right down to what was said,  even though they were nowhere near the incident and their snowflake would never ever do a single wrong thing. A damned shame.

 

I try to avoid pet peeves, but my pet peeve when I taught was the parents who attempted to tell me exactly how an incident went down on my watch when the parent wasn't within five miles of the school when it happened, based solely on the word of the kindergartner or sixth-grader (the two grades I taught). Even if a kid is being truthful to the best of his ability, he sometimes lacks either the cognition or the perspective to recount a story accurately. If a kid cannot retell the sequence of events in Goldilocks and the Three Bears with at least 80% accuracy, odds are that he'll screw up at least a few details in retelling his version of the cafeteria food fight when relaying the particulars to his parents, and that's if he's trying to be honest and not trying to cover up his own culpability.

Stachen seemed to be a likable-enough kid, though I didn't entirely believe his story  about the phantom  Isaiah forcing him to throw the phone.  That one seemed far-fetched to me. Had Statchen  merely said that Isaiah took the phone from him and threw it, that would have been credible to me, but bullies, as evil as they are, don't typically force their prey to throw objects.  It's also not usually too hard to locate a kid's home. Even if the school won't give out student addresses, which they absolutely shouldn't, it's not usually very hard to ask around and find out where any given kid lives.  

I suspect Stachen initially did take responsibility but that his parents didn't want to pay for the phone.  Then again, had the police recorded the questioning of Stachen, a much clearer picture of the unfolding of events might have been available.

If I were in charge of the schools of the world, cell phones would be allowed because we're all terrified about the horrible things that have been known to happen in schools, and parents need to know that their children can reach their parents in an emergency.  My rule would be that the maximum allowable amount anyone would recover in the event that a cell phone were lost, stolen, or damaged would be fifty bucks. Get the kid a cheap phone with just the capacity to call or text home.  Children don't need to bring their iphones to school, and school personnel don't need to be forced into the roles of detectives when cell phones are inevitably lost, stolen, or damaged.

 

*One of my brother-in-law's dental patients' kids was name Trenwyl. The way the kid's name originated was that, at some party the parents attended (the attendees were probably all wasted, which didn't bode well for any of their already-on-the-way children, though the parents didn't cop to drinking or using) each set of parents drew seven Scrabble tiles and came up with the best name they could form using all the letters. (Vowels and consonants were drawn separately so that the name would at least be pronounceable.) Trenwyl was the first kid to be born among the pack. His parents stuck to the pact and stuck the kid with the Scrabble-tile name. Then all the other parents said, "Ha ha! We played a funny joke on you!" and gave their kids at least semi-normal names. Poor Trenwyl.

Edited October 31, 2018 by jilliannatalia
I forgot to include the story about Trenwyl.

[poeticlicensed]

15 hours ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

Short Marriage, Long Debt-After a two month marriage, the groom's parents want the venue cost back, and a loan repaid to pay the ex-wife's debt off.    They were married and separated in less than two months, after living together for almost four years.    His parents paid for the venue, because bride didn't have the money for the deposit.  The bride's parents paid for the rehearsal dinner, but they're not suing for that back.    Bride was loaned $1,900 to pay off debts, so the couple could buy the house they were renting.   Fortunately, they didn't buy the house. The groom's mother only expected the loan to be repaid after the marriage failed.    JJ tells the groom's parents to stick it, and they get nothing.    Bet Thanksgiving will be lovely at the plaintiff's home if the defendant attends.

OK, this case didn't belong in court, other than the loan to pay off her debt, but hells bells, if I were his parents who shelled out thousands and they broke up like six weeks later, I would be LIVID. Most of the time, I really don't care about the backstory, but I really want to know WTF happened to a couple who lived together for FOUR years, happily planned a wedding and then it all falls apart in a few weeks. 

 

As for the bridezilla, cookie mom and the DJ, I think I'll stay away from the bartering world if my choice for a wedding DJ is toothless grandpa at $1200! That's a really high price for a DJ for a wedding. I was just rolling my eyes at her litany of complaints. Oh the horror! Notice her hubby didn't make a sound. Hope he realizes that this will be his role. JJ wished him good luck, lol. 

[AngelaHunter]

Did anyone notice when Bridezilla was rattling off her tragic list of grievances that the audience started laughing at the "15 seconds of awkward silence" and was permitted to continue laughing at her? Normally JJ shushes them instantly but I guess in this case Bridezilla was so utterly ridiculous and outrageous I think even Byrd was laughing at her.

[augmentedfourth]

Protip: If you want a decent DJ for your wedding, pay actual money instead of cookie points, and maybe find one who isn't, like, 80.

[KittyMom4]

15 hours ago, Spunkygal said:

Ok, I am trying to turn over a new leaf and not be overly critical of people BUT

Don't go changin' @Spunkygal!

[CrazyInAlabama]

Apparently, the DJ had to travel far out of town for the wedding location too.     I bet he was the only person who agreed to take barter points for performing.   ANd apparently there was another DJ for the reception portion.  

When I lived in New Mexico, the tradition there was the girls parents had shelled out big time for a Quinceanera (a 15th birthday party to equal Cinderella's ball), so a traditional wedding in the church in that area was paid for by the groom's family.    Then there was a huge reception a few hours later, and that was usually split between the families, and many family members or family friends would finance specific parts of that as gifts.   I don't know if that's still the custom, but it made things more affordable for the families.  

Edited November 1, 2018 by CrazyInAlabama

[TheLastKidPicked]

2 hours ago, AngelaHunter said:

Did anyone notice when Bridezilla was rattling off her tragic list of grievances that the audience started laughing at the "15 seconds of awkward silence" and was permitted to continue laughing at her? Normally JJ shushes them instantly but I guess in this case Bridezilla was so utterly ridiculous and outrageous I think even Byrd was laughing at her.

The last few cases had us saying, "Well, what do you expect?"

1)  Anybody can call themselves a D.J.  Didn't you check this guy out first?  Look at some reviews, and ask for referrals? 

2)  Your hipster son is FINALLY marrying the woman he's lived with for years.  And you are paying off her debts as part of the . . . dowry?

3) I'll let Poeticlicensed speak for us here:

3 hours ago, poeticlicensed said:

Notice her hubby didn't make a sound. Hope he realizes that this will be his role. JJ wished him good luck, lol. 

BWHAHAHAHAHAHA!

[Brattinella]

2 hours ago, AngelaHunter said:

Did anyone notice when Bridezilla was rattling off her tragic list of grievances that the audience started laughing at the "15 seconds of awkward silence" and was permitted to continue laughing at her? Normally JJ shushes them instantly but I guess in this case Bridezilla was so utterly ridiculous and outrageous I think even Byrd was laughing at her.

I did not notice this, and now I wish I had recorded this episode!  I do know that I was laughing, though.

[Mondrianyone]

The hapless groom did get off one word in the hallterview.  He pronounced himself "Devastated," not a powerful endorsement of his masculinity, IMO.  Oh, the humanity!

[AlleC17]

I was continuously flipping off the bride, her dumb, devastated groom and the mom.  They were beyond ridiculous. 

[Mrs Shibbles]

In the video the bride showed of the mic going out when someone was giving a toast, her Bridezilla behavior snatching the mic and flagging down the DJ and expressing her unhappiness about it was the only embarassing thing about it.  Roll with the punches- if a mic goes out, just laugh it off and talk louder.  Clearly having things going exactly her way was more important than the thoughts and feelings of her friend.

[Spunkygal]

10 minutes ago, Mrs Shibbles said:

In the video the bride showed of the mic going out when someone was giving a toast, her Bridezilla behavior snatching the mic and flagging down the DJ and expressing her unhappiness about it was the only embarassing thing about it.  Roll with the punches- if a mic goes out, just laugh it off and talk louder.  Clearly having things going exactly her way was more important than the thoughts and feelings of her friend.

Exactly! If she can’t roll with the punches at her wedding, good luck with what the rest of your life brings. That’s why I suggested that during the awkward, painful, devastating whopping 15 seconds of silence, just grab your groom and plant one on him! Everyone would have loved it. 

[jilliannatalia]

1 hour ago, TheLastKidPicked said:

The last few cases had us saying, "Well, what do you expect?"

1)  Anybody can call themselves a D.J.  Didn't you check this guy out first?  Look at some reviews, and ask for referrals? 

2)  Your hipster son is FINALLY marrying the woman he's lived with for years.  And you are paying off her debts as part of the . . . dowry?

3) I'll let Poeticlicensed speak for us here:

BWHAHAHAHAHAHA!

The husband was rather sickeningly placating in the hallterview.   While he's undoubtedly the more stable of the two, I wouldn't trust either of them with any task more physically or emotionally demanding than perhaps holding  a single order of cotton candy for thirty seconds. 

[CrazyInAlabama]

I fixed the loan in the failed wedding marriage thread.   Thanks for the correction, since I apparently wasn't paying too much attention to that.   I'm guessing if the ex-bride hadn't paid the $100, then it would have been a gift not a loan.      I'd love to know the back story on the entire wedding/marriage ending in divorce after less than two months, but I guess I'd have to watch Jerry Springer (is he still on?)  for that one, or Dr. Phil.    In court the two about to be divorced exes seemed very polite, and sensible, too bad the groom's parents couldn't have that level of maturity.   

Edited October 31, 2018 by CrazyInAlabama

[TheLastKidPicked]

27 minutes ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

 I'm guessing if the ex-bride hadn't paid the $100, then it would have been a gift not a loan.      I'd love to know the back story on the entire wedding/marriage ending in divorce after less than two months, but I guess I'd have to watch Jerry Springer (is he still on?)  for that one, or Dr. Phil 

And this is a recurring theme on Judge Judy.  While people are getting along and happy, they gave each other money.  But when things fall apart, that same money was suddenly a loan.

And you are right, when the ex-bride paid the first $100, she confirmed the debt.

[SRTouch]

2 minutes ago, TheLastKidPicked said:

And you are right, when the ex-bride paid the first $100, she confirmed the debt.

Besides admitting she considered a loan, but as we hear so often, just didn't have the money so was paying other bills first... any wonder her credit history was preventing the purchase of a house. 

[FairyDusted]

19 hours ago, configdotsys said:

The plaintiffs got $1800 to repay the loan. The daughter in law gave them $100 the past April because she felt bad and because ex mother in law was "harassing" her.

 

She said they were "chocolate dipped Oreos" or something. She sold them for a dollar each online? And sold 1200 of them? How did she ship them? Weird.

Wait?! Don't they make those in a box already? I recall buying some and hell I can put a sticker on it my damn self.

19 hours ago, AngelaHunter said:

OH gawd. California unicorn-snowflake, spoiled Bridezilla's wedding was totally ruined because, well, those 15 seconds meant everything to her. Stupid heifer and her stupid mommy yakking about cookies or whatever. Oh, STFU, all of you. So sweet how bridegroom, Goofy, hugged his large Bridezilla in the hall as she wept bitter tears for her devastation from which she will never recover. NEVER! Gee, at my wedding the DJ played the wrong song for our first dance, and we hadn't even bartered cookies for his services! I was totally destroyed, I tell you, and I've never been the same. Whenever anyone mentions my wedding, tears begin to squirt out of my eyeballs.

More wedding nonsense. Parents suing the ex-bride of their douche-y, hipster son, Dakota, for the cost of the wedding.  Dakota and his blushing bride wed in November and split in January. No one told them that after the big, showy wedding that all this grown-up living stuff was going to be so hard and all, I guess. "White lace and promises... a kiss for luck and we're on our way (to divorce court)." Haha. You all STFU too.

Child support kerfuffle: Those two ladies sure know how to pick 'em. Their wee deadbeat sits there mute and lets his big girls battle it out. What does he care? According to his ex-girlfriend/baby momma, he doesn't even work, so she can whistle for the 15K in child support, some of which was coming from the plaintiff's paycheck. But hey, they both wanted him. They got him.

 

17 hours ago, AngelaHunter said:

I think it is too, especially for mature couples who are both working and living together and want an extravaganza but can't afford it. This goes back to olden times, when parents were so thrilled that some guy was taking their spinster daughter/burden off their hands, they would pay for it all, plus throw in a dowry to boot. "Here, take her. She's your problem now." And parents of the bride are still expected to pay for almost everything, even though their daughters aren't forced to sit home, forbidden to move out or get jobs and just had to wait to "catch" a man. So many women shrieking for equality, so how about this: You and your betrothed pay for your own wedding and your parents can make a gift of whatever they want or are able to do - not have to mortgage their houses. If you can't afford a wedding to rival those of royalty or Celine Dion, scale it down. There. All equal now. JMH(and probably very unpopular)O.

All of THIS! I went through this wedding BS will my own daughter. 250 at Wedding eating steak, fast forward 3 years and we got hit up for bankruptcy money. Then cell phones, car, and oh yeah, I paid for the damn divorce too. We are out tons of money but I finally got the DOG from the POS Ex.

Yup. I'm BEC on these wedding cases. 

Silly me. I got married in my own living room. Guess who's still married?

[AuntiePam]

In today's car-scratch case, what did JJ hear from defendant's witness that convinced her that the defendant was lying?  The only difference in their stories was which one of them checked on the show time and theater location.  Oh, and how defendant was informed that they were at the wrong theater.  But those were minor variations.

There's no doubt that defendant keyed the car.  A witness who saw defendant (identified as a bald man, which he was) next to the car and she heard a long screeching sound.  She got his license plate number and reported the incident to the police. 

Defendant must have realized that he'd been spotted, which is why he and his GF left without seeing a movie.

[configdotsys]

19 hours ago, ButYourHonor said:

I don’t care about the legalities of the case, I wanted to bitch-slap the smug defendant in the watch repair case.  He also lied in the halter-view, saying he couldn’t leave the watch with the same guy who had “screwed it up twice before”.  Twice?  What twice?  You brought it to him once for a battery, and then for this.

One of the things that makes me insane is a husband who uses phrases like, "My wife won't ALLOW me to..." Are you fucking five years old? Does the person who married you and loves you think you are a moron? WTF is up with that? I cannot remember a time in my 25 years with my spouse ever "disallowing" him from doing something. In the case of the watch, my spouse would not have considered bringing it a second time to someone who screwed up the first time. This dolt was whining about "I can't tell my wife I went back to the guy who messed it up before." Well of course you can't, because she'll know for sure that you're a fucking brainless nimrod for going there again. 

I'm stealing the word 'stabby' from a few of the posters here for this occasion. I feel STABBY now!

Edited October 31, 2018 by configdotsys
Fixed a typo.

[FairyDusted]

Stabby is right @configdotsys! The only no allows are agreements that I don't smoke weed in the main house and he has to do the same for cigars.

Allow me my ASSSSS!

[CrazyInAlabama]

Car Scratch Case-I totally believed the plaintiff's witness in the car scratch case, and thought it was wonderful that she saw the man scratch the daylights out of the plaintiff's car, and took down the license number and stepped up with the police report.    I'm sure he scratched a stranger's car because of the bumper sticker for Hillary.     That man was totally lying.     The plaintiff's witness is a music teacher, and I really doubt she spends her time wandering parking lots and lying about people.   

I thought it was interesting that JJ bounced the defendant's gf/witness before the case started.    It's not likely that anyone's significant other is going to rat them out on national TV.    The defendant thinks that anyone is going to believe doing circles around stranger's cars, parked on an isolated spot on the end of the parking lane, and making a loud scratching noise isn't keying the car?    He absolutely did it, and I wonder how many other times he's done the same thing?    And his girlfriend was obviously lying for him when she was brought back in to testify.       

So defendant Albert says they saw the movie, but gf Sharon said they didn't after all, so they're already changing stories.   Why would he lie about seeing the movie or not?   It was a pointless lie, but the gf certainly got crossed up with what she was supposed to say.  I bet that was a fun trip back to Austin for the defendant, and witness.    

$2,600+ for the plaintiff.   

 

Man Ejected From Own Home-Plaintiff wanted Defendant, home owner, single dad, booted out of his own home.   Plaintiff wants attorney fees, punitive damages, and false arrest.    Met in November 2017, moved in with him in March 2018, and had big fight on 23 April 2018, and applied for a protective order, and doesn't have the police report or complaint to give the  judge for protective order, just the order the judge issued.   She stayed in the house until July 2018.    The poor man was ejected from his own home from April to July when she moved out.    P. moved her daughter and friends into the townhouse she owned when she moved in with him, and after July moved back there.    P. called D's parenting consultant (custody with ex-wife) and complained about how he treated his kids.     Mutual orders of protection were granted, but p. kept calling him.    Old scam, get order of protection, contact the other person, and then when they contact you back, you call the police.        D. filed order of protection violation against plaintiff, and she got arrested.      If p. is in the medical field, I want to know in what capacity because she's a total skank and idiot.          The d. had to leave his own house, because the local judge was a fool, so I guess the kids had to move too, or at least he had to find somewhere to live with his visitation schedule for the kids, and that wouldn't be cheap.  And a note for the p. skank, mandated reporter has to report to the authorities, not to the custody consultant in the divorce.      There is zero truth that she never filed for a protective order before, she's obviously been around the block a few times, and also rode hard and put away wet too.         The p. skank should have left, not him.     

Nobody gets anything, and they both deserve nothing.    

 

Father / Son Car Project Fail-Son and dad worked on a car for son, and then mother needed car, takes son's car in return for paying him $55 a week for borrowing it.    Mom had the car since July, owes the son $1100, and paid him less than $500.    The idiot mother bought used tires from someone online.    P. claims it needs ball joints, but she's still driving it anyway.    What an idiot she is, driving a car with bad ball joints, and used tires.  Her son wanted the car back, and she's still got it.     Mother of the Year material isn't she?         Now that she's broken the car, and it needs major repairs the son gets it back.   If the son is foolish enough to trust her again, he's going to get screwed over by her again.   I'm not sure if the son got the back payments for rental, but the mother owed him a lot,    And I hope he gets new ball joints and tires.  

Edited November 1, 2018 by CrazyInAlabama

[lovesnark]

In the man ejected from his own home case,  the plaintiff's hair looked like she combed it with an egg beater. And, her very ill fitting, bunched up sweater looked like she pulled it from the bottom of the dirty clothes basket that morning.

Albert the liar totally keyed the hell out of that lady's car.

[AngelaHunter]

1 hour ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

Man Ejected From Own Home

The tale of vile hag, Donna "Yup Yup Yup" Miller vs. goofball def William "I just came off a 3-week bender" Zabrok (and how did I know immediately they're from MN?) is a wonderful endorsement for online dating sites. "Join our site and you too can have the romance of your life and find your Happily Ever After! Just look at these krazy kids, Donna and William." Oops.

Donna certainly does have a police report she filed against her violent former bed partner, William! Oh, well - she doesn't have it with her "at the moment". Is that a problem? She's in "health care"? Of course she is. Don't get sick in MN! And Donna? New bra!

1 hour ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

Father / Son Car Project Fail-

My favorite kind of case. An incubator (can't call her a mother) ripping off and scamming her own child, who had to sue her to get back his car from this hustlah. Lisa May, that shameless sociopath, made me sick and she deserves a major beating.

[CrazyInAlabama]

Donna also needed a strong girdle.    Please tell me she's not knocked up, but just very poochy.      I can't imagine that man being tied to that delusional squatter for life, and having a kid be subjected to her as an incubator.   

[lynny]

On 10/29/2018 at 10:53 PM, NYCFree said:

I believed Statchin. I am a former teacher and there is absolutely something not right at the school for getting the police involved like that. Kids are involved all the time in situations that would be crimes if adults were involved. However, these are kids, without fully formed brains and we don’t want to see them have criminal records for things that can be easily disciplined  in other ways. Think of all the schoolyard fights that you’ve seen, how many times have the cops been called?

That said, I really do believe that an Isaiah exists, that he’s a mean kid, and that he smacked the phone to the ground. It does make sense to think, if all the same kids go from sixth period to seventh period, to think a kid would ask “is this your phone?” I think there may have been race involved in deciding to call the police on a young black boy when a young white girl's phone is broken.

 

This case made me furious. Judy is an old, rich, white lady. I understand she hasn't personally experienced systemic racism, but to not acknowledge its existence is disgusting. Talk about white privilege! I can't believe the staff aired this case at this time. 

You can't separate the behaviour of the cops from the statements made by the kid. These cops were willing to question a 12-year old boy without a parent present. Is it really so unbelievable that they'd tell him he was going to jail? Or if they "only" told him they were going to press criminal charges, is that better? Wouldn't a 12-year old hear that and assume jail? And, don't forget that there is likely a not a 12 year old black boy in America who hasn't been taught to be extremely wary of police.

AND!! What was so unbelievable about any of it? The kid picks up a phone. Has probably a minimal amount of time to get from one period to another. He can't detour to the damn office. He either drops the phone back where he found it or he takes it to the next class and asks the kids whose phone it is. He did the right thing!

There were NO witnesses that said this kid did anything! The only evidence that he was responsible was that tainted police report. It's BS.

Edited November 1, 2018 by lynny

[chenoa333]

13 hours ago, FairyDusted said:

Wait?! Don't they make those in a box already? I recall buying some and hell I can put a sticker on it my damn self.

 

All of THIS! I went through this wedding BS will my own daughter. 250 at Wedding eating steak, fast forward 3 years and we got hit up for bankruptcy money. Then cell phones, car, and oh yeah, I paid for the damn divorce too. We are out tons of money but I finally got the DOG from the POS Ex.

Yup. I'm BEC on these wedding cases. 

Silly me. I got married in my own living room. Guess who's still married?

I love that story, FairyDusted! Glad you rescued the dog and your marriage is still strong!

[KittyMom4]

18 hours ago, Mrs Shibbles said:

In the video the bride showed of the mic going out when someone was giving a toast, her Bridezilla behavior snatching the mic and flagging down the DJ and expressing her unhappiness about it was the only embarassing thing about it.  Roll with the punches- if a mic goes out, just laugh it off and talk louder.  Clearly having things going exactly her way was more important than the thoughts and feelings of her friend.

I finally got to see this episode, but all the recaps on here helped me get the full experience! She snatched that microphone and swung it so hard I thought her brand new groom was going to end up with a broken nose. Imagine what she's gonna do when her big doofus husband doesn't wash the dishes to her satisfaction, poor guy is going to be toast!

[AngelaHunter]

13 hours ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

Donna also needed a strong girdle.    Please tell me she's not knocked up, but just very poochy. 

Oh gawd! I suspect, and hope, that her days of fecundity are long gone. She just appeared to be melting, like a big tallow candle.

[chenoa333]

21 minutes ago, AngelaHunter said:

Oh gawd! I suspect, and hope, that her days of fecundity are long gone. She just appeared to be melting, like a big tallow candle.

Damn it AngelaHunter....once again you provide the "word of the day" and my dumbass had to go look up the definition! On the upside..my fellow PT posters keep me on my toes and thanks for "edumacatin'" me! However, I'm still smart enough NOT to borrow anyone some money!

[bad things are bad]

Car Scratch Case--oh what a lovely beatdown, telling the GF that her man was a POS. I figured we'd be in for some fun when she was sent outside. 

Father / Son Car Project Fail--she was pathetic and I mean that in the literal sense. Who at a certain age wants to be at a point where $50 a week is too much of an expense to handle? 

[NYCFree]

By the way, I loved the father son car building project. I can’t do anything mechanical at all and was jealous at the hands on learning experience. What a great way to have quality time with your kid, teach him great skills, and ends up with a working car. It’s like a win win win situation, until the loser mom came along.

[SRTouch]

1 hour ago, bad things are bad said:

Car Scratch Case--oh what a lovely beatdown, telling the GF that her man was a POS. I figured we'd be in for some fun when she was sent outside. 

And yet, she's standing by her man and supporting him in hallterview 

Quote

Father / Son Car Project Fail--she was pathetic and I mean that in the literal sense. Who at a certain age wants to be at a point where $50 a week is too much of an expense to handle? 

Mindboggling, woman is upset and just stops paying son for the use of HIS car because he (and of course dad) dared to dictate how car was used. Wonder just what sort of restrictions they put on the use? If they knew about the bad suspension I can see them asking her to use it only as needed until suspension was repaired. 

Nice to think of dad buying a couple clunkers to wrench on to spend time with son - but hope he planned to finish making it safe before kid started driving. Great learning experience, something kid will remember fondly forever. Brings to mind the old "idle hands" quote - much better for teenager than to be bored out of his mind or playing video games.

Yes, 'pathetic' sounds about right for mommy.

Edited November 1, 2018 by SRTouch

[AngelaHunter]

1 hour ago, bad things are bad said:

Who at a certain age wants to be at a point where $50 a week is too much of an expense to handle? 

Especially when not paying means she's stiffing her own kid and she didn't even care!

A decent human being would have said, "I'm so sorry, sweetheart, but I just don't have the $50 every week but I promise I'll pay $25 or even $15" instead of making her kid drag her into court for the world to see what kind of amoral shitbag she is. Ugh.

[zillabreeze]

1 hour ago, AngelaHunter said:

instead of making her kid drag her into court for the world to see what kind of amoral shitbag she is. Ugh.

I'm rather surprised we don't have more serial killers & school shooters given the caliber of breeders out there.

[CrazyInAlabama]

Today's new cases-

Children Witness Tasering-Plaintiffs claim defendant had man falsely arrested, car impounded, and some other garbage.    What it turns out to be is P. gf (works at Disney) is sister to D's gf.     Two men get in a fight, p. tasers d. but p.s finger was in d.s mouth, and he lost half of a finger.    P. gf swears P. man of the golden appendage, never had a taser.   However, the d. kept the taser, and turned it into the police.    Meanwhile d's gf (sister of p.'s gf) claims to be boinking p. of the golden appendage, and I have to go throw up for a minute or two.     JJ believes the defendant, so plaintiff gets nothing because he's a liar, and an idiot. 

Baloney Story From Squatter-Idiot claims he and gf, moved in with some renter ($4k a month!), renter stopped paying after January, landlady got $11k from renter.    Landlady claims she never knew about idiot and gf moving in, claims they are squatters, and trashed the place.     The only property the idiot squatter wants is his mattress, the big problem is that he's a squatter, and when he called about the mattress the day the locks were changed that's the only time the landlady knew he existed.     The plaintiff gets nothing, because he is nothing, and a loser.

Unbelievable Toll Bill-To the tune of $4k plus.    The best part is that the d. works for NYC, and the plaintiff claims she can't get his back child support.     D. is a jerk, with lame stories about his debit cards, and doesn't pay his $4k.   D. got car in his name in divorce, but car is still registered and insured in her name for some lame reason.    JJ said the plaintiff should go back to supreme court in NYC, and get a judgment and garnish the man's NYC wages.    JJ also told the p. to go to family court when he doesn't pay child support, and every bad thing he deserves will happen.   Plaintiff gets enough to pay the tolls after the divorce, and is advised where to go to sue village idiot ex for back child support, and tolls. 

Holiday Betrayal-A woman used a friend's credit card for a lot of makeup, Lyft rides, and other things.     This is in addition to the money that the woman already paid back .    The D. (obviously a relative of Cruella Deville), claims the plaintiff authorized everything, and the $700+ for makeup was December, but the charge says almost a month later.  That is when the b#*$& defendant keeps saying "The plaintiff is just upset she found out her late husband was gay, and was spending money on gay companionship" (not how she said it, but I'm still angry the producers let her say that so many times).      The defendant also claims that when the husband died that she spent all day cleaning the woman's house, and the plaintiff says the woman never set foot in her house.      The defendant loses, but only after shooting her stupid mouth off about the late husband again.    I really think that Byrd really wanted to hustle her through the gate with his foot planted firmly up her butt, and I wish he had.    Maybe a pay per view of that would be a good idea.   

Edited November 2, 2018 by CrazyInAlabama

[Brattinella]

54 minutes ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

That is when the b#*$& defendant keeps saying "The plaintiff is just upset she found out her late husband was gay, and was spending money on gay companionship" (not how she said it, but I'm still angry the producers let her say that so many times).   

I really think the the plaintiff should have gotten punitive damages for her repeated unnecessary slander of a dead husband. 

[CrazyInAlabama]

Who knows what the late husband was like, and what the plaintiff knew or didn't, but how disgusting that the thieving defendant kept trying to divert attention from her theft by repeating her statement about the husband over and over.  I really wish Byrd had accidentally whacked her with the swinging door. 

[augmentedfourth]

Landlord Marina Silver had so much filler in her lips, she couldn't keep her head upright. I don't know what she was trying to accomplish with the sultry breathy baby voice she kept switching on. I doubt JJ finds that appealing in any way, but hey, she won, so whatever.

 

Sara "Sally" Seaman was morally in the right over her scamming friend, but she was just asking to become a meme or a reaction gif with her imitating a largemouth bass every time the defendant said something. :O :O :O :O

 

$4K worth of tolls in just a couple months is kind of impressive, even for NY/CT. Maybe he was just joyriding through the boroughs after a while?

[Chellichik]

Regarding the car scratch - yeah, pretty obvious he did it.  I was bugged that they insinuated it was because of her Clinton sticker.  There was no proof of any reason why he did it so why bring up the sticker?  Maybe the woman cut him off and stole his parking spot?  There was no evidence of that either, but just as plausible as that he did it because of a stupid sticker.  They were from Austin, right?  Pretty sure Austin is a liberal area so this guy sees Clinton stickers all over the place.

[AngelaHunter]

1 hour ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

Holiday Betrayal-A woman used a friend's credit card for a lot of makeup,

Jennifer Thibodeaux - hustlah, liar, scam artist, bottom feeder and general, all-around POS. Oh, she had to use plaintiff's credit card because the weather was really bad and well, no one will give her a credit card in her own name. Plaintiff should have taken a hint from that info.  Plaintiff couldn't wait to shower Jennifer with make-up and Lyft rides to work and other shit because of inclement weather and, by the way, plaintiff's husband was gay and plaintiff didn't even know! Deceased and secretly gay husband bought stuff for men on the credit card! I'm pretty sure he didn't do that after he was dead, you stupid buffalo. You need money? Go pawn your wig and all that makeup. I hope plaintiff learned that no good deed goes unpunished and doesn't fall for anyone else's hard luck story, even if they're "on hard times" and in desperate need of makeup.

29 minutes ago, augmentedfourth said:

Sara "Sally" Seaman was morally in the right over her scamming friend, but she was just asking to become a meme or a reaction gif with her imitating a largemouth bass every time the defendant said something.

Yeah. I guess JJ didn't tell her to "close your mouth" just because defendant was such a scumbag it outweighed the large-mouth bass impression.

1 hour ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

Unbelievable Toll Bill-To the tune of $4k plus.

Again, I gaze in wonderment that Ms. Kisic - attractive, well-dressed, articulate - saw something so irresistable in deadbeat, fugly, stupid asshole def. that she not only wanted to get hitched to him, but produce offspring with that cretin. Did you see the face of the audience member behind plaintiff when she said her former hubby racked up 4K in tolls?

Someone needs to do a documentary called, "Why Are So Many Women so Desperate?"

[NYCFree]

1 hour ago, Chellichik said:

Regarding the car scratch - yeah, pretty obvious he did it.  I was bugged that they insinuated it was because of her Clinton sticker.  There was no proof of any reason why he did it so why bring up the sticker?  Maybe the woman cut him off and stole his parking spot?  There was no evidence of that either, but just as plausible as that he did it because of a stupid sticker.  They were from Austin, right?  Pretty sure Austin is a liberal area so this guy sees Clinton stickers all over the place.

I think that the plaintiff was seeing an earlier movie and there was no way she would have had an interaction with someone arriving at 2:30. I think that’s part of why Judge Judy went so meticulously through what movie everyone saw, and what time the movies started.

Therefore, either the guy had a psychotic break, or there was something about  the scratched car that inspired ire. In today’s political climate, a candidate sticker is the likely reason.

[badhaggis]

1 hour ago, AngelaHunter said:

Jennifer Thibodeaux - hustlah, liar, scam artist, bottom feeder and general, all-around POS. Oh, she had to use plaintiff's credit card because the weather was really bad and well, no one will give her a credit card in her own name. Plaintiff should have taken a hint from that info.  Plaintiff couldn't wait to shower Jennifer with make-up and Lyft rides to work and other shit because of inclement weather and, by the way, plaintiff's husband was gay and plaintiff didn't even know! Deceased and secretly gay husband bought stuff for men on the credit card! I'm pretty sure he didn't do that after he was dead, you stupid buffalo. You need money? Go pawn your wig and all that makeup. I hope plaintiff learned that no good deed goes unpunished and doesn't fall for anyone else's hard luck story, even if they're "on hard times" and in desperate need of makeup.

Yeah. I guess JJ didn't tell her to "close your mouth" just because defendant was such a scumbag it outweighed the large-mouth bass impression.

Again, I gaze in wonderment that Ms. Kisic - attractive, well-dressed, articulate - saw something so irresistable in deadbeat, fugly, stupid asshole def. that she not only wanted to get hitched to him, but produce offspring with that cretin. Did you see the face of the audience member behind plaintiff when she said her former hubby racked up 4K in tolls?

Someone needs to do a documentary called, "Why Are So Many Women so Desperate?"

Any one want to join me on a road trip to slap Jennifer Thibodeaux? She is a vile, disgusting excuse for a human being. I felt so bad for the poor plaintiff! She not only lost her husband then she had to listen to this woman slander him.