I really enjoyed the jewelry case. The plaintiff, who ripped off Chanel by selling their altered products under her own name and continued to do so in spite of TEN "Cease and desist" orders from Chanel, is suing her business partner and friend of 40 years. Neither litigant knows how to use a computer so when they switched to online selling, hoping to duck Chanel, def hired some woman she met in an elevator to get them listed on "Shopify" etc. This woman gets 25$/hr to do what sounds like very little. Plaintiff says the assistant billed for 8hrs for packing a box. Good gig for the assistant! I enjoyed this case, as I enjoy nearly all contract cases. All parties could speak properly and committed no acts of vandalism or physical violence.
And then we're back to the usual. Plaintiff, who says she is a SSMOFOUR (she said "five" at first so who knows?) buys an old beater car from def, Diana Ross, and then complains about it. Plaintiff shouldn't be held responsible for her AS IS purchase. She's a "female" so of course, she don't know nothing about cars. We know how well this goes over with JM, who did say how much that annoys her. She works three jobs! She has all these keeds! Everyone, even total strangers, should take care of her and make sure everything she buys is in perfect condition. I wonder how much of the money from those three jobs went towards getting all those scribbly titty-tats she was displaying? Anyway, I was kind of annoyed that JM felt "so sorry" for her. Why? She's a grown woman who chose to squirt out a bunch of kids with who knows how many loser sperm donors. who can afford 4 kids these days? But yeah, I guess between all the impregnations, gestations and birthings, she had no time to learn about man things like cars. Hint: Birth control is a lot cheaper than four (or five) kids.
JM didn't feel nearly as sorry for the def handyman in the last case. Even I felt for him. He's no spring chicken, has had all kinds of serious health problems/surgeries and appeared here with a bandaged head and black eye from a skin cancer operation, yet still has to do heavy work to earn a living. Yes, he should have returned the money plaintiff gave him for a job he was unable to do, but geeze, JM was harder on him than she was on the tatted SSMOF.