Jump to content

Type keyword(s) to search

Jill, Derick & the Kids: Moving On!!


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, GeeGolly said:

Legal age varies all the time. From buying alcohol, renting automobiles, joining the military, etc. Its TLC's contract so they choose what age works for them.

TLC doesn’t control contract law for the state of AR. They cannot determine that someone 20years old is still a minor and needs an adult/guardian to sign for them just because it’s advantageous for them. That’s different than car rental which isn’t an employment contract and is based on insurance rates. TLC is going to protect themselves legally- it was JB and Michelle who manipulated the emotional trust of their children, I hold them to a higher standard than the production company. 
 

1 hour ago, Zella said:

It's really sad. Even the Shiny Happy People producer who did a Reddit AMA last week, when asked about online snark communities, said something along the lines of "Snark on. Snarkers were the first people in the general public to call bullshit on the Duggars and realize something was very wrong in that house." 

I’ve said for a while that I’m sure we will see a number of changes to labor and employment laws surrounding monetized social media as the kids whose lives were monetized will become adults and sue. We have Coogan’s Law because Jackie Coogan became an adult and sued. I bet in the next 15yrs the regulations around children appearing in reality tv and social media will be radically different. Just a theory I have. 

  • Like 11
  • Applause 7
  • Useful 1
  • Love 4
Just now, Scarlett45 said:

TLC doesn’t control contract law for the state of AR. They cannot determine that someone 20years old is still a minor and needs an adult/guardian to sign for them just because it’s advantageous for them. That’s different than car rental which isn’t an employment contract and is based on insurance rates. TLC is going to protect themselves legally- it was JB and Michelle who manipulated the emotional trust of their children, I hold them to a higher standard than the production company. 

Thank you! I was drafting a reply on this point when your post popped up. You said it better than I was going to. 

  • Like 8
28 minutes ago, GeeGolly said:

I certainly am not a lawyer, but from my understanding there are no laws or rules pertaining to children appearing on a reality show. I would think this would allow TLC some leeway in writing their contracts.

I think I misunderstood your original post- I was speaking to the fact that the children that were legal adults being manipulated by Jim Bob to sign documents giving TLC rights to footage. TLC wasn’t going to look out for those kids- and they had to get the signatures to film, so JB emotionally manipulated his kids and wasn’t truthful with them. Where I am coming from is that I’m not surprised TLC didn’t see this as their problem- they had the signatures they needed by law, they were satisfied. 
 

JB/Michelle signing for the minor children was expected, they couldn’t sign for themselves. But state law determined who was a minor, not TLC’s business model. 
 

Yes there are currently no laws and rules regarding minors appearing in reality tv- but there are employment and contract laws which govern filming obligations, the use of likenesses, using people in promotional materials, etc- those items required permission from the legal adults (for themselves) and the parents/legal guardians (for the minors). 

  • Like 12
On 6/9/2023 at 1:01 PM, Salacious Kitty said:

I hope it KILLS Jinger's sales. 

I guess I don't understand this thinking. To me, Derick is worse than Jeremy, and Jill and Jinger are on equal footing. I think Jill's "changes" are far far more dangerous than Jinger's. She's all hippy, dippy in her appearance and I believe that leads to people thinking she's more open and potentially understanding. However, I think her brainwashing comment, pulling her kids out of school and general support of Derick during the entire Jazz thing, speak volumes. I don't wish Jill and Derick any more success than any other Duggar. 

She already tends to get a pass and people don't react as rabidly to reporting her to sponsors and getting her dropped because she "seems" nice. I will never forget that Jill was the snitch and daddy's little girl, well into adulthood. I don't think that just magically goes away. 

  • Like 9
  • Useful 2
(edited)
2 hours ago, AstridM said:

Jill was the one who went to her parents to report Josh’s abuse. IMO, her sisters owe her a lot of thanks. 

But that was after admitting to years of snitching on her siblings.  And correcting them in interviews.  And telling them to be more godly & less worldly on camera.  And pridefully holding herself up as the example they should follow.  She admitted it all.

Yes, she did a very important thing by telling what Josh did.  

But that doesn't give her a lifetime pass to be a self-righteous, bigoted, ignorant, untruthful and selfish grifter.  And then be congratulated for it.

Edited by SnapHappy
  • Like 8
  • Sad 1

I think Jill and Jinger both deserve credit. Jinger for taking a stand against Gothard and condemning some of the ways she was raised and Jill for taking some baby steps and (temporary) bigger steps and realizing JB is "not who she not thought he was".

Although IMO Jinger has walked farther away than Jill from the bullshit, neither get credit for "breaking away" from Fundy hate.

Jinger is bougie and Jill is nutty crunchy. What's on the outside doesn't necessarily mean the inside is different too.

  • Like 19
4 hours ago, charmed1 said:

It’s probably not a coincidence that Olivia said she was triggered by the documentary, particularly Jill’s segments.

Hell, Tuesdays trigger Olivia, especially if it gets her attention. Girl is a walking talking new-agey self-help manual.   (I almost said "podcast" but I think she actually has one)

  • Like 4
  • Useful 1
  • LOL 5
On 6/11/2023 at 11:50 AM, Meow Mix said:

Yes, vinaigrette makes sense.  Sour cream in tuna salad does not.

 

Whoever wrote that has a different definition of rare than the rest of us.  I see they still have to sit on the same side of the table or they'll get divorced or something.

I love mayo, but I swear Hellman's has changed their recipe and the mayo is just not as good. It has a chemical-ly aftertaste. I've started using half mayo, half sour cream for salads that call for mayo, and I've liked them so far.

  • Like 1
  • Mind Blown 1
  • Useful 6

She did make more of an effort for the memoir. The promotion for the kid's book was laughably bad because it was so nonexistent. I think at one point they even promised a live about it on social media that ended up being hours late, and they both looked like they'd just rolled out of bed and had nothing really coherent to say. I suffered extreme secondhand embarrassment just watching them flail around and try to promote that book. 

  • Like 12
3 minutes ago, Zella said:

She did make more of an effort for the memoir. The promotion for the kid's book was laughably bad because it was so nonexistent. I think at one point they even promised a live about it on social media that ended up being hours late, and they both looked like they'd just rolled out of bed and had nothing really coherent to say. I suffered extreme secondhand embarrassment just watching them flail around and try to promote that book. 

That's more promotion than I remembered. 😃

  • LOL 5
On 6/12/2023 at 1:35 PM, GeeGolly said:

I certainly am not a lawyer, but from my understanding there are no laws or rules pertaining to children appearing on a reality show. I would think this would allow TLC some leeway in writing their contracts.

I'm so confused by the contracts that were shown in SHP. My understanding was that TLC did not issue individual contracts to each Duggar because TLC signed contracts with the Duggar LLC (which is common practice). Therefore, all payment went to the LLC and the members of the LLC were contractually bound to "perform." 

So we are shown the contract from 2012 which has the Michelle signature (presumably on behalf of the Duggar children as a representative of the family LLC), but also Josh signing on behalf of himself (though I seem to recall that Anna signed for Josh). This makes me wonder if that snapshot of that contract was really the contract with the LLC - and not TLC at all. 

Then the 2014 contract which Jill did sign separately the day before her wedding... same scenario.

Does anyone have a zoomed out version? Are these contracts directly with TLC?

The wording would be so interesting.

And I still say that I have no idea why Derick, Mr. wordly accountant, did not think to even look into the contractual obligations until the time of Israel's and then Sam's birth. Instead of looking into it - he quit his stable job with health insurance - and decided to live off of "mission donations" while fathering two children. There have to be conversations that occurred that we don't know about. Did he just assume they'd be taken care of?

  • Like 8
  • Useful 4
6 hours ago, Tuxcat said:

I'm so confused by the contracts that were shown in SHP. My understanding was that TLC did not issue individual contracts to each Duggar because TLC signed contracts with the Duggar LLC (which is common practice). Therefore, all payment went to the LLC and the members of the LLC were contractually bound to "perform." 

So we are shown the contract from 2012 which has the Michelle signature (presumably on behalf of the Duggar children as a representative of the family LLC), but also Josh signing on behalf of himself (though I seem to recall that Anna signed for Josh). This makes me wonder if that snapshot of that contract was really the contract with the LLC - and not TLC at all. 

Then the 2014 contract which Jill did sign separately the day before her wedding... same scenario.

Does anyone have a zoomed out version? Are these contracts directly with TLC?

The wording would be so interesting.

And I still say that I have no idea why Derick, Mr. wordly accountant, did not think to even look into the contractual obligations until the time of Israel's and then Sam's birth. Instead of looking into it - he quit his stable job with health insurance - and decided to live off of "mission donations" while fathering two children. There have to be conversations that occurred that we don't know about. Did he just assume they'd be taken care of?

Actually Derick was a full-time employee at Walmart when Izzy was born and they went to TLC asking them to cover their out of pocket bills.

I think something was up by then. Maybe Ben and Jessa's partially TLC funded honeymoon. Or Maybe Jessa and Ben went to TLC and negotiated a new contact when they were married.

Something woke up and pissed off Derick prior to Izzy's birth.

  • Like 3
  • Useful 4
(edited)
49 minutes ago, GeeGolly said:

Actually Derick was a full-time employee at Walmart when Izzy was born and they went to TLC asking them to cover their out of pocket bills.

I think something was up by then. Maybe Ben and Jessa's partially TLC funded honeymoon. Or Maybe Jessa and Ben went to TLC and negotiated a new contact when they were married.

Something woke up and pissed off Derick prior to Izzy's birth.

IIRC Jill said in SHP that they hadn't wanted Izzy's birth to be recorded for the show, referring to Anna's labor/delivery scenes, and indicating she didn't want that for herself. But TLC insisted that they were obligated to have it by contract. I believe Jill said they negotiated to have a camera so they could do their own filming without a crew present (for at least some of the labor/delivery). So by the time Jill went into labor they were already getting pushback from TLC (or the production company) which I'm sure started them questioning what the heck was happening, even if they didn't rock the boat at that time.

I'm not sure at what point - perhaps when they requested reimbursement for their out of pocket costs - they got further into the dialogue with TLC, which led to their seeing the contract Jill signed on the day before her wedding without understanding what it was at the time. 

However the contracts were structured, I'm sure TLC's lawyers would be sure to get solid paperwork showing the consent of each of the participants to be shown on the show. Whether the contracts were between TLC and the individuals, or between TLC and a Duggar legal entity representing those persons (which would in its turn need to have signatures showing that permission from each person). 

ETA:  Jill has also said that when the DIllards were in Danger America [for SOS Ministries, IIRC], they hadn't wanted to come back to Arkansas, but again because of their contract, they had to fly home to record for the show. IMO they weren't destined to be missionaries, but if their time in the field was interrupted (I think more than once) by having to pack up and fly back to the States, they were practically set up to have a bad experience. Yes, Derick came across as a doofus and Jill was over-the-top anxious, but it's like they never got a chance to be really free of JB's circles of control including the show. Even if Derick's beefs with JB are only about the money (I don't share that view), in SHP Jill made comments about the IBLP life being controlling, and that having your own feelings and ideas was not something much allowed by IBLP or in her family. She also commented that IBLP appealed to her dad, IIRC when the subject was about control. She didn't say in so many words that JB was a control freak but the implications were clear to me. 

Edited by Jeeves
  • Like 18
  • Applause 2
  • Love 2
(edited)

Okay. Here's the info on the contract Jill signed on the day before her wedding. A screenshot of part of the first page, which appears around the 21 minute mark of Episode 3 of SHP. It looks like JB's company (Mad Family Inc. - not an LLC, BTW), acted as the provider of services for all the named Duggars, granting rights to Discovery Talent Services, LLC (TLC is part of Discovery corporate) for the show. I take this to mean that Discovery paid JB's company for the services of all those people. AFAIK this is the contract whose signature page we also saw - or at least the part showing Jill's signature on the day before her wedding. Because each named Duggar (or their parents in the case of legal minors) also signed this, I assume TLC wanted to be sure they documented the consent for each person to appear on the show. I'm not familiar with entertainment industry contracting practices; this was probably nothing out of the ordinary as to how it was structured. 

JillContract1.thumb.jpg.2dc4ac5c47434ab2d57d38c1ebe5a48a.jpg

ETA: I played the episode just past the first page of the contract, where they panned down the signature page. Here are a couple of screenshots. Although the documentary didn't do so, I've blacked out the signatures in these images. The signatures are there to see if you watch the episode, but I'd rather not make life easy for anyone with evil intent by putting images of their legal signatures online. There was another shot of part of the contract, IIRC. These were shown as Jill was discussing how they didn't want to have their missionary stint in Danger America interrupted by trips back to Arkansas but TLC said they had to. Again, all this is about at 21 minutes into Episode 3.

JillContract2.thumb.jpg.a2f44cb2b43969b7f4452cb320cf4a5c.jpg

 

JillContract3.thumb.jpg.aac750cccd2d49c3cff824fef4e5e327.jpg

Another edit: At about 18 minutes into Episode 4, Jill says they asked for all the TLC contracts involving her/Derick. She then says (and there are screenshots) that the found that well after she turned 18, JB and Michelle were signing contracts for her as a "minor child" - and for other kidults as well. She said that as kids reached 18 they didn't fix that but kept on signing as if they were minors. The signature page shown at that point is different from the ones I've posted above (from Episode 3).  

Edited by Jeeves
Better organized the shots of the signature page
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 5
  • Useful 10
(edited)
5 hours ago, Salacious Kitty said:

This contract is different than the one posted prior that listed Jill as a minor. 

Yes. I added an edit at the end of my post above, after re-watching Episode 4. In that episode, at about the 18 minute mark, Jill said they got copies of the contracts from TLC. That' when she learned that for years after she turned 18, her parents kept signing for her as a minor. There's a screen shot of the signature page of that document shown at that point, which is what was posted upthread. 

ETA: Of course we have just a glimpse into the contracts, not the whole picture. But based on what was revealed during SHP, I believe that (1) for a few years after Jill turned 18, her parents kept signing contracts on her behalf stating she was a minor child, and (2) this was also the case as to other kidults. We saw one of those signature pages on the show and a screenshot was posted upthread.

Jill said that it went on like that for awhile and "nobody fixed it." Until somebody wised up and prepared documents recognizing that Jill and others were now adults, which they had them sign. As to Jill, that was apparently the contract document she signed on the day before her wedding, of which I posted screenshots above. Note that it includes signatures of Jessa and Jinger as well as Jill. 

(We heard a long time ago that after their marriage, Jeremy and Jinger signed separate contracts for the show, and though I'm no fan of his, I've always respected him for that. It must have ground JB's gears to lose control, but under their doctrines, Jeremy became Jinger's headship, and when it came down to it, Jeremy didn't buckle under to JB. Heh.)

Edited by Jeeves
  • Like 8
  • Useful 8
(edited)
10 hours ago, Jeeves said:

We heard a long time ago that after their marriage, Jeremy and Jinger signed separate contracts for the show, and though I'm no fan of his, I've always respected him for that. It must have ground JB's gears to lose control, but under their doctrines, Jeremy became Jinger's headship, and when it came down to it, Jeremy didn't buckle under to JB. Heh.)

Very interesting @Jeeves. Thank you so much!

So what's the timeline on this? The 2014 contracts were for a period of FIVE years IIRC, thereby locking Jill in and mandating that she comply with the show's travel and filming requests. 

If Jinger signed at the same time, when and how was Jeremy able to negotiate differently? 

And is this what made Derick so angry? Jeremy was (allegedly) able to negotiate and Derick seemingly was not able to? 

---------

Derick worked at Wal-mart Jan 2014

Jill and Derick married June 2014.

Dillard Ministries established 2014 (prior to Izzy's birth)

Opportunity to go to the mission field - prior to Izzy's birth (according to their blog)

Izzy born April 6 2015 (footage aired in the fall with first episode of new Jill and Jessa: Counting on)

May 2015 quit Wal-mart and moved to Central America and Dillard Ministries starts taking donations.

Jeremy and Jinger Courtship June 2016

Sam born July 2017

Derick leaves after twitter tirade summer 2017

Edited by Tuxcat
  • Like 1
  • Useful 6
4 hours ago, Tuxcat said:

Very interesting @Jeeves. Thank you so much!

So what's the timeline on this? The 2014 contracts were for a period of FIVE years IIRC, thereby locking Jill in and mandating that she comply with the show's travel and filming requests. 

If Jinger signed at the same time, when and how was Jeremy able to negotiate differently? 

And is this what made Derick so angry? Jeremy was (allegedly) able to negotiate and Derick seemingly was not able to? 

---------

Derick worked at Wal-mart Jan 2014

Jill and Derick married June 2014.

Dillard Ministries established 2014 (prior to Izzy's birth)

Opportunity to go to the mission field - prior to Izzy's birth (according to their blog)

Izzy born April 6 2015 (footage aired in the fall with first episode of new Jill and Jessa: Counting on)

May 2015 quit Wal-mart and moved to Central America and Dillard Ministries starts taking donations.

Jeremy and Jinger Courtship June 2016

Sam born July 2017

Derick leaves after twitter tirade summer 2017

Jessa and Ben were married in November 2014. Not long after the wedding but prior to Jill & Jessa: Counting On, Jessa and Ben were spotted at TLC headquarters. Speculation then was they were signing with them for the new show.

Also Jeremy was slowing creeping onto the scene starting in early 2015.

I have a question - wouldn't the cancelation of 19 Kids void the original contract? Wouldn't new ones need to be drawn up for J&J: Counting On?

  • Like 9

Even if Jinger was buttoned into a contract with a few years to go, when Jeremy showed up the show would have to sign him up if he were going to appear, especially as a featured participant. I could see Jeremy insisting that he would only sign a deal that was specifically for Jinger and himself. Which is no big deal legally, they just amend the main contract to reflect that Jinger's no longer there under the auspices of Mad Family, Inc. (JB's production company), and ink a separate deal with Jer and Jinge. I'm assuming here that Jeremy did NOT just add himself to the passel of people represented by Mad Family, Inc. - IOW that the 'separate contract' we heard about was indeed separate from JB's company. 

BTW, I've re-watched SHP. When Jill talks about JB giving out money to the kidults, she specifically mentions Mad Family, Inc. by name. That's where she says that after she got her money from JB, he decided that as the other kids were reaching adulthood, and the boys were wanting to start businesses, he'd pay each of them a lump sum representing their work over the years on the show. But only under the condition that they sign up for a long time (she said something like "the rest of their lives"), with JB's production company, Mad Family, Inc. She obviously did *not* do that, and her affect when talking about it is pretty scornful of JB for pulling that power move over his kidults.

  • Useful 16
6 hours ago, GeeGolly said:

 

I have a question - wouldn't the cancelation of 19 Kids void the original contract? Wouldn't new ones need to be drawn up for J&J: Counting On?

It depends on the wording of the original contract, I think.  It could've been worded to allow TLC options on any and all reality shows featuring the Duggars and also allowed them to change the name and premise of the show at any time should they wish to do so.

  • Like 5
  • Useful 5
3 hours ago, Jeeves said:

Even if Jinger was buttoned into a contract with a few years to go, when Jeremy showed up the show would have to sign him up if he were going to appear, especially as a featured participant

So did Derick ever sign his own contract? He maintains he never had one.

7 hours ago, GeeGolly said:

Jessa and Ben were married in November 2014. Not long after the wedding but prior to Jill & Jessa: Counting On, Jessa and Ben were spotted at TLC headquarters. Speculation then was they were signing with them for the new show.

So why would Derick not do the same?

  • Like 4
  • Useful 1
5 hours ago, Jeeves said:

That's where she says that after she got her money from JB, he decided that as the other kids were reaching adulthood, and the boys were wanting to start businesses, he'd pay each of them a lump sum representing their work over the years on the show. But only under the condition that they sign up for a long time (she said something like "the rest of their lives"), with JB's production company, Mad Family, Inc. She obviously did *not* do that, and her affect when talking about it is pretty scornful of JB for pulling that power move over his kidults.

When I heard that part (however it was phrased) I thought about Scientology forcing people to sign billion-year contracts.  

  • Like 16
5 hours ago, Tuxcat said:

So did Derick ever sign his own contract? He maintains he never had one.

So why would Derick not do the same?

I think he did. There's no way TLC would film him without. It probably went down the same way. But it sounds better that Jill signed one and didn't know what it meant. Since she's undereducated and trusted her father. Then college boy Derick signed a contract that he didn't read. Plus it keeps Derick as the "victim" where nothing is his fault. He didn't do anything. JB lied and Jill signed the contract.  

  • Like 11
  • Useful 1
2 hours ago, andromeda331 said:

I think he did. There's no way TLC would film him without. It probably went down the same way. But it sounds better that Jill signed one and didn't know what it meant. Since she's undereducated and trusted her father. Then college boy Derick signed a contract that he didn't read. Plus it keeps Derick as the "victim" where nothing is his fault. He didn't do anything. JB lied and Jill signed the contract.  

Jill signing something she didn’t understand because her father asked her to wasn’t wise, but was very understandable, especially given her age, sheltered upbringing. JB was the scumbag in that situation. 
 

Derick signing something without reading it I have less sympathy for- 1. JB wasn’t his parent who had the emotional pull and expectation of loyalty with him, 2. Yes he and Jill were the same chronological age but he had a lot more life experience. JB was still in a position of power, but Derick SHOULD'VE known better; and it seems Jill realizes she should’ve know better but Derick wouldn’t dare admit that. 

  • Like 17
(edited)

I think Derick is once again fudging timelines and facts in an effort to defend himself and repair his image.  Izzy's first appearance on TV was actually on what turned out to be the last episode of 19 kids. The episode was a family talking heads of sorts. If I'm remembering right the episode featured JB&M, FF & Anna, Jessa & Ben and Jill and I think Josie. Derick wasn't there because he was recovering from his mouth surgery.

  • We know that show was filmed and aired close to real time because Izzy was born in April of 2015 and the show aired in May.
  • Then Scandal #1 breaks in the same month.
  • Then the Kelly interview in June.
  • And finally TLC announces 19 Kids is cancelled in July.
  • July is also the month the Dillards left for their "10 month" stint in El Salvador.
  • Then, a few months later in October TLC announces their 'new' show Jill & Jessa: Counting On.
  • In December  of 2015 the first episode of J&J airs.

So Derick is saying all the shit starting hitting the fan shortly after Izzy's birth (or before if you count the Dillards refusing the crew to film his birth), yet TLC decided to rebrand the show in Jill's name. Why would TLC go in that direction if Derick and Jill were already pushing back?

What really has me curious is Derick's first IG rant. That happened over two years later. The Dillards had already moved back home. Sam was already born. We're supposed to believe Derick sat on his anger for two years? I'm not saying Derick's saga is all straight up lies but I think they're fudging here and there. I don't know, maybe they hit up TLC for a bonus for Izzy's birth, were denied and then tried again when Jill was pregnant with Sam and that is when it all started. By then Derick hadn't worked in two years and the Dillard Family Ministries went bust.

Edited by GeeGolly
  • Like 12

At one point someone asked Derick on social media when their association with TLC ended.  He actually gave a straight answer of May 31, 2017 which is rare for him.  Usually he gives some word salad so he can walk it back later by saying he didn't say a particular thing.  That may be technically true, but he knew what kind of impression he was giving people.  Anyway, 

I do think the May date was actually true because Joy was married shortly before then.  Even though Jill was matron of honor, she was hardly in the episode.  There was a catch-up episode with some of the married or going to be married couples filmed in June (we know that because Joy said on that show that she and Austin had only been married for something like 25 days) and Jill and Derick were absent.  TLC was trying to keep it quiet maybe in hopes that they would change their minds.  However, in August around the time a new season of Jazz's show was being promoted, Derick made his first bigoted tweet.  TLC then made a week statement that his opinions were his own.  It wasn't until November when he doubled down on the bullying that they finally came out and said he was out.

So, they were done with TLC before Sam was born.  What I wonder was how the five year contract Jill signed played into that.  I could see TLC once they realized what JB had done letting Jill off the hook for filming Sam's birth because they didn't want to be implicated in JB's shenanigans around getting her to sign something without showing her what she was signing.

As for Derick, he's a typical conservative who just makes things worse by not admitting his own mistakes.  He signed something with TLC or JB or he wouldn't have been filmed.  If he had just admitted that he made a mistake in not understanding what he was signing, most people would have understood.  Yes, he was old enough to know better, but he was around 25 and probably a bit naive.

  • Like 14
  • Useful 5
On 6/16/2023 at 8:57 PM, Scarlett45 said:

Jill signing something she didn’t understand because her father asked her to wasn’t wise, but was very understandable, especially given her age, sheltered upbringing. JB was the scumbag in that situation. 
 

Derick signing something without reading it I have less sympathy for- 1. JB wasn’t his parent who had the emotional pull and expectation of loyalty with him, 2. Yes he and Jill were the same chronological age but he had a lot more life experience. JB was still in a position of power, but Derick SHOULD'VE known better; and it seems Jill realizes she should’ve know better but Derick wouldn’t dare admit that. 

Derrick should have known better but 1. He lost his dad when he was 16, and 2. He trusted JB.

  • Like 9
  • Useful 1
9 hours ago, auntieminem said:

Jill has posted belated father's day wishes on FB and IG. She also included a HFD to JB.  https://www.instagram.com/p/CtsVS7wMjHy/

Wonder what he thinks when he sees she can still love him but not agree with him.?  

Good question. In one of the SHP episodes (I think it was Episode 1), both Jill and Derick commented on the way that the IBLP thinking doesn't recognize that you can disagree with someone (from the context I believe they were talking about authority figures) without disrespecting them.  Jill said, "Honor, respect, and obey were on the same level back then" and Derick agreed. 

Also, in SHP Jill shared a memory of her father that was positive. She talked about how in the early days he worked multiple jobs to support the family. He had a tow truck service, and she remembers riding with him. She said the smell of diesel fuel reminds her of the tow truck, with JB and his cup of sweet tea, going out on a call. 

  • Like 13
  • Sad 1

I think the entire situation with Jill is sad. Derick, with a little sprinkle of Amy, are the only reasons I can think of to keep this feud going. JB made a huge asshole move in not compensating his children early on and Jill's siblings have Derick to thank for getting payouts, but why retell the story again and then again in the book? Other than money from the book and some fandom love for her and Derick, what is Jill gaining?

Also, I think she needs to be careful because she continues to shill kid products on IG. Sure, the boys get swimming lessons, etc out of it, but using that theory, Jill got a lot of benefits from filming. I know the comparison is a reach, but history shows us the rise to the top is often the last step before the fall. The SM keyboard warriors for Jill can become anti-Jill in a hot minute.

For Jill's sake I hope the book is a thoughtful book about the perils of being raised in a restrictive faith based atmosphere by authoritarian parents and not chapter after chapter about the money feud.

  • Like 10
  • Useful 1
13 minutes ago, BetyBee said:

One difference between the sisters' books for me is that I would never waste money on Jinger's book or even get it from the library. I might buy Jill's book, unless reviews show that it reveals nothing new. 

I didn't read Jinger's and likely won't read Jill's either. But I come from a different place as I don't see many differences between Jill and Jinger. I feel a lot of empathy for both of them and also some disgust due to their beliefs. But overall they had the same childhood struggles and are both doing the best they can as stunted adults.

  • Like 19

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...