Jump to content

Type keyword(s) to search

Josh & Anna Smuggar: A Series of Unfortunate Events


  • Start Topic

Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, Zella said:

Yes Tor was on the computer. It was how the CSAM was accessed. 

I am not sure this is right.  I will need to hear the forensic testimony and read the transcript before I trust anyone's recap of the evidence.  Here's the thing.  TOR is an onion router.  You use it to brose the internet, get on the dark web, and do internet things.  From what I read (and trust me, I get confused at times) he used BitTorrent to download some of the files and TOR to download other files.  BitTorrent COULD run through TOR, but the speed would be horrible for downloading.  BitTorrent does run on all OS's, including Linux.  So I'm not sure if the recap we've read have been totally clear on what was downloaded where.  The things they showed in court are def CP but aren't the horrific DD type stuff.  I would assume (taking all the risks with guessing) that the things shown in court came from BitTorrent and not the dark web.  At the end of the day, I don't care where he got it.  It's all illegal. But BitTorrent is a lot more accessible to people than the dark web. I don't trust recaps because I've had my own words mangled so badly in newspaper articles that I don't trust anything but the actual words the forensic people use.  

  • Useful 13
  • Love 5
51 minutes ago, lilwhitelion said:

I wanted to quote from the Redditor's long recap to show that they said it was Derick and 
Anna holding hands when coming back from a break, but they have removed their post.  In any case, that's why it was so weird.  Josh and Anna holding hands is expected.

The Redditor stated a few times that the proceedings were fast paced and he/she couldn’t catch up at times. Understandable that there will be typos and confusion.

  • Useful 1
  • Love 11

There were numbers posted at one point, when the judge thought he might need to restrict the number of seats for the media. Something like 10 seats reserved for each side, which left somewhere around 20(?) seats for the media/general public.

Would all the husbands get the same benefit of doubt that Derick's getting? I mean I'm a pro at avoiding folks in the real world. My husband is one that likes to charge over and say hi, but I'll use a clothing rack, my cell phone and whatever others means available to avoid a casual contact when I'm on a mission.

I'm still left with a lot of questions about Derick's encounters yesterday.

  • Love 7
10 hours ago, Tuxcat said:

but then also has an open router so anyone, including the defenses "creepy guy from McDonald's" can hack into it and of course the computer password is "Joshua"

Is he too stupid to know things, or does he care enough to use TOR - the dark web for "protection from paparazzi" or is he-- back to stupid for not password protecting his wifi... I do see the defenses problem - Josh is a walking contradiction. I really want to be in on some of the defense teams brainstorming sessions.

Prosecutors should honestly interview all those people Josh did rehab with for his porn addiction. I'm sure they shared all sorts of tips with each other.

I know nothing but if TOR is supposed to scramble IP addresses maybe there is some sort of reason you don't want to password protect your wifi?

I hope I'm not getting too obnoxious here with my examples and stuff.  

So the first thing we do on onsite, after kicking in the door and securing the people, is to check for open Wi-Fi.  If the router is password protected, we note that.  If there's an open guest account, we note that.  If the system is locked down like Fort Knox, we note that.   I'm not claiming that every Fed LE follows these rules, but these are our best practice, for this exact reason.  So all HSI has to say is, no we checked that and there was no open xyz. 

TOR doesn't scramble IP addresses.  TOR simply encrypts your data through several servers or relays and that encryption tends to obscure or hide your IP. It is NOT fail proof.  The feds actually found a way to exploit something in TOR a few years ago that unmasked your IP address.  If you use TOR over VPN, then that's pretty fail proof.  Any time you use multiple methods of privacy, you protect yourself.  It's like using a condom AND being on the pill.  If Josh had used Duck duck go, a VPN AND TOR, that would pretty much do the job.  But each of these tools alone has some flaws and some chance of showing your IP address.  If you really want to add more security, do a double proxy jump.  If you go through a Proxy server and then go to another Proxy server, my chances of figuring out who you are or where you want is non-existent.  TOR is used to maintain anonymity, VPN's are there to protect privacy.  That sounds like the same thing but its different in the computer world.

  • Useful 15
  • Love 2
11 minutes ago, Panopticon said:

Obviously nothing about this situation is funny.

But if something about it WERE going to be funny, it would be Jeremy suddenly showing up in court wearing a fancier suit than Derick’s. 

That reminds me of the old episode of The Donie Gillis Show where Dobie and Milton  kept trying to outdress each to get Thalia’s attention. At one point Dobie came in with a walking stick that folded out into a seat.  I could totally see Jeremy trying something like that.  The aforementioned haberdashery starts at 14:39. 

 

  • LOL 11
48 minutes ago, Snow Fairy said:

When does the trial start today? I have to look for the time difference, it's 4pm here where I live...

I think the Smuggars will be less smug today, I hope

A local reporter posted a pretty in-depth article yesterday that said the judge wanted to start at 8:30 am today but had had a hard time with delays throughout the day yesterday. To the point, he repeatedly apologized to the jury over it. So, it is nearly 10 am here and in theory, they should have been into this for over an hour by now but maybe not. 

  • Useful 6

From The Sun and several other sources : 

"Jill and Jedidiah are set to testify this week, however, it is not clear at the moment if it will be for the prosecution or the defense."

So, no one knows who Jill will be testifying for.

Also: 

JUST NOW

COURT BEGAN EARLY ON THURSDAY

According to a reporter with KNWA and Fox24, court began at 8.30 local time for Josh Duggar's trial today.

Edited by MsJamieDornan
  • Useful 3
  • Love 2

I’m just gonna say it…Anna , if you insist on going to court every day, buy another dress or two.  It’s not like it’s wrong to re-wear something, and having too many outfits can be wasteful.  But these are not poor or working class people.  Surely you can afford two nice dresses.  You just had another kid and maybe nothing fits but that seems like a good enough reason to get something new.  Dress the body you have and all that. 

  • Love 15
11 minutes ago, MsJamieDornan said:

From The Sun and several other sources : 

"Jill and Jedidiah are set to testify this week, however, it is not clear at the moment if it will be for the prosecution or the defense."

If Jill is testifying for the defense it will be interesting to see how they try to play this.  There is really no doubt, as the judge himself ruled, that the molesting happened.  Will they try to handwave it away a la Duggar and make it a boyish mistake and none of the girls were affected by it?  Seems like a risky move to me if so.  And if they try, now, to deny that anything ever happened - wow - does that open a door for the prosecution to come in with more evidence then they might have been allowed to take into court before?

  • Love 2
5 minutes ago, Ijustwantsomechips said:

I’m just gonna say it…Anna , if you insist on going to court every day, buy another dress or two.  It’s not like it’s wrong to re-wear something, and having too many outfits can be wasteful.  But these are not poor or working class people.  Surely you can afford two nice dresses.  You just had another kid and maybe nothing fits but that seems like a good enough reason to get something new.  Dress the body you have and all that. 

Agree with you on all points, BUT, remember Jim Bob is controlling the purse strings, and while he will fork out $$$ on legal fees or campaign expenses, he is notoriously cheap about little things like clothing.  And Anna is probably too afraid to ask for money to buy new dresses.  

At least that is my take.

  • Useful 3
  • Love 5
25 minutes ago, Ijustwantsomechips said:

Word on the street is Justin and Claire are in court today.  I guess they really are taking turns.

 

Honestly, it's well past time that someone in that group realized that leaving Anna alone with no support other than sorta Derrick and kinda the defense attorneys is not a good look. For that group.

  • Useful 2
  • Love 7
5 minutes ago, SMama said:

I find hard to believe Jill will testify for the defense. It just doesn’t make any sense.

Agreed. She’s not involved in any way with car sales and unless she’s kept it very well hidden on SM, her relationship to Josh is basically non existent.  Of all the Duggar siblings, she’s the last one I’d expect to go to bat for him. I could see Jed! being the defense’s Duggar witness. He has “experience” with car sales and still seems very much on daddy JB’s payroll. 
 

I suppose anything is possible but I’d be shocked if Jill is there on Josh’s behalf. 

  • Love 10
2 minutes ago, hathorlive said:

Who is Hilaria?  There's too many kids, wives and hangers on to process this.

Justin's mother in law. Her name is Hillary but we nicknamed her after Alec Baldwin's batshit wife. She is a circus unto herself and my favorite Duggar in law for that reason. Lol

Edited by Zella
  • Useful 2
  • LOL 2
  • Love 11
8 minutes ago, GeeGolly said:

Derick must have a generous employee to allow him to take time off to attend the trial. Unless he somehow accrued a bunch of time off already. Or maybe he never did get a job.

I'm not saying that he does have a new job, but if he does, he started this job in September, at which point he knew the trial dates, and presumably told them upfront that he would need to take that time off. I've done something similar when I've started a new job and had prior commitments. (In one case, for a federal trial, even, though nothing like this.)

And in this particular case, I can readily see an employer outright telling him to take unpaid time off for this trial. Not as a matter of generosity, but because the trial would be a major distraction, not just for Derrick, but other coworkers. 

Or he just doesn't have a job.

  • Love 13
1 minute ago, GeeGolly said:

Joy is shilling a blue tooth speaker. She says, Austin is our DJ today and he's in the video. She might have wanted to save that one for another day.

Why on earth would someone take speaker recommendations from someone else who a) doesn’t listen to a variety of music, and b) doesn’t listen to music with any bass or percussion?

  • LOL 4
  • Love 10

Meanwhile, I see that the defense is still focused on the cell phones, and like....defense, I know you don't have much to work with here. I get that. But this fixation on what federal agents did or did not do with the cell phones has seriously not been working out for you. Maybe focus a little less on these cell phones and a little more on their owners.

 

  • Useful 1
  • Love 6
17 minutes ago, SJC said:

Justin's mother-in-law.

There's a Justin? 😁

(Yeah-- and there are also a Jason and a James.....Really?? Really???.....The younger Howlers are almost as Lost as the Lost Girls, when you start to think about it.... And yet a lot of them -- and their mothers-in-law -- seem to think they're celebrities. 😁 )

Edited by Churchhoney
  • LOL 14
  • Love 3
2 hours ago, iwantcookies said:

Get a lawyer and do not talk to the police without one.

And Never Ever Ever admit guilt or plead guilty. My son and a group of friends were picked up for minor in possession of alcohol when he was 16. He pleaded guilty, got home arrest and one year of probation. Everyone else lawyered up and had all the charges dropped before trial.

  • Useful 3
  • Love 10
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...