Jump to content

Type keyword(s) to search

MLB Thread


smittykins
  • Reply
  • Start Topic

Recommended Posts

He was paying himself $5 million a year.  So he got his money back that he invested in the beginning* and then bounced.

How long before Posada suddenly grows a conscious and leaves, too?

*Plus he was getting $1-2 million in bonuses every year.  He's selling his shares, so he's really washing his hands of the Marlins.

Seems sudden.  Expecting some scandal soon.

 

Edited by sandrajane
  • Love 2
8 hours ago, sandrajane said:

He was paying himself $5 million a year.  So he got his money back that he invested in the beginning* and then bounced.

How long before Posada suddenly grows a conscious and leaves, too?

*Plus he was getting $1-2 million in bonuses every year.  He's selling his shares, so he's really washing his hands of the Marlins.

Seems sudden.  Expecting some scandal soon.

It would be scandalous if there was a baseball season firmly in place. Also, it's the Marlins. If you're going to steal money and keep most of your rep as a good guy, that's the place to do it.

  • Love 4
1 hour ago, Mittengirl said:

I hate the idea of buys and ghost wins.  It sounds like both sides want the money from an extra round of playoffs, but they want to make it very difficult for the wild card teams to win.  

Sure - I remember back in ye olden days of only one wild card team when people bitched about how the top seed could be stuck playing a superb wild card team in a short series.  For an example that's near and dear to someone from Southern California, in 2002 the 99 win wild card Angels stomped the top seeded Yankees 3-1.  Elite teams will want to make sure there's more of a difference than just home field between the division winner and wild card.

  • Love 1

No MLB this year- No problem.   I have been following the NPB (japanese professional baseball ) for 3 years now and find it it much more entertaining than MLB.  No goofy rule changes, tie games allowed in standings, no showboating and best of all, the players are all skilled in the fundamentals of baseball.  Season starts late in late March.   

  • Useful 1
  • Love 2

My hubby grew up a Reds fan, then liked the A’s too (we’re 80’s kids, it’s what you did) and always haaaaaated the Yankees.

I turned on YES today and they are playing game five of the 2001 World Series.  And he’s sitting here just getting irate at what he thinks are bad calls by the umps not in the Yankees favor and when the Yanks take bad swings.

It is adorable, and unexpected.  Who knew someone could still surprise you after being hitched for 25 years?

  • LOL 4
(edited)
44 minutes ago, cleo said:

I still don't think there will be a CBA anytime soon in spite of all the breathless tweets from reporters. 

But am I the only one that hates the changes they're talking about? 

Banning the shift- hate

14 team postseason hate

I could live with a pitch clock. Larger bases- I dunno. Neutral I guess.

The union voted AGAINST robot umpires.  I have been wanting robot umpires for years.

I also hate banning the shift.

I have no idea why any player would want this, I guess except pitchers?

I always want more teams to make the postseason because Toronto never gets to go .  LOL.  AL East is too competitive.

Edited by Ms Blue Jay
3 hours ago, cleo said:

I still don't think there will be a CBA anytime soon in spite of all the breathless tweets from reporters. 

But am I the only one that hates the changes they're talking about? 

Banning the shift- hate

14 team postseason hate

I could live with a pitch clock. Larger bases- I dunno. Neutral I guess.

Hi Cleo...someone has to tell me why professional baseball players cannot figure out how to "hit it where they ain't".  Nope.  They insist on trying to hit rockets into the defensive shift. 

  • Love 9

Sure, let's ban the shift.  Then, make the pitchers throw underhanded use whiffle balls and plastic bats.  Extreme shifts have become more prevalent lately, but the obvious answer to that is to have the hitters learn to adjust to it by bunting or hitting to the opposite field.   The game does not need to be 'dumbed down' for hitters who refuse to adapt.

  • Useful 1
  • Love 11
On 3/2/2022 at 3:00 PM, rcc said:

Maybe ESPN will air Japanese League games like they did KBO. 

 

Hi RCC...I found the Korean Baseball shows (early AM here on the East Coast) to be just what to watch while getting up in the morning.  The announcers were really knowledgeable.  But the best part was the home team that seated large stuffed teddy bears in the stands. Very cool. 

6 hours ago, theatremouse said:

I do not like banning the shift. Learn to bunt, people!

I am pro robot umpires and cannot understand why anyone other than a finesse pitcher would be opposed.

Don't need a bigger post-season.

And while we're at it, I don't like the DH, but I know that's a losing battle.

Hi Theatremouse...I look forward to the time that a batter gets annoyed at the robot...and clobbers it with a bat.  Wham!

  • LOL 1
59 minutes ago, grommit2 said:

Hi RCC...I found the Korean Baseball shows (early AM here on the East Coast) to be just what to watch while getting up in the morning.  The announcers were really knowledgeable.  But the best part was the home team that seated large stuffed teddy bears in the stands. Very cool. 

Hi Theatremouse...I look forward to the time that a batter gets annoyed at the robot...and clobbers it with a bat.  Wham!

So did I. Early morning baseball. Good games too.

  • Love 1
5 hours ago, Rootbeer said:

Sure, let's ban the shift.  Then, make the pitchers throw underhanded use whiffle balls and plastic bats.  Extreme shifts have become more prevalent lately, but the obvious answer to that is to have the hitters learn to adjust to it by bunting or hitting to the opposite field.   The game does not need to be 'dumbed down' for hitters who refuse to adapt.

My devil's advocate counterpoint would be that hitting a major league baseball is already one of the hardest things to do in sports and it's only gotten more so. Hitters are celebrated if they fail "only" two-thirds of the time. In conjunction with the extreme shifts there have been numerous changes in pitching occurring - from the rise of pitching-by-committee to only having pitchers face a line-up twice, all of which ensures hitters now hardly ever see a tired pitcher or get a chance to really get a feel for the pitcher that game. And there are more hard throwers than ever.

If it were that simple for hitters to just learn to hit the ball to where fielders aren't, we'd see more of that. Most of us played baseball at levels where the ball is thrown at far lower speeds. I don't think it's a question of hitters just refusing to adapt. This is a game that by nature has always been heavily stacked against hitters; where else is someone celebrated for failing over half the time? Only 10 players in MLB history have managed to have an season OBP of .500 or more (and nine of them played in the distant past while the 10th is Barry Bonds, still two decades ago) and it's also quite notable when scanning the list of all-time career OBPs to see how few active players are listed. There's only one in the top 20, Mike Trout, and he's down at #18. Since career OBPs include a player's twilight years, in theory active players should be over-represented since many of them haven't yet hit their past-their-prime phase that will drag down their career OBP. But they're not, which says a great deal about how much harder it's gotten in recent years to be a successful hitter.

I appreciate the strategic element of extreme shifts, and don't necessarily think that eliminating those is the answer. But I think something should be done to at least bring pitchers vs. hitters back in balance a bit more. If it's not eliminating extreme shifts, then do something with the pitching mound, for instance. Just as present-day hitters have to contend with more, make present-day pitchers contend with more.

  • Love 2
48 minutes ago, Black Knight said:

But I think something should be done to at least bring pitchers vs. hitters back in balance a bit more. If it's not eliminating extreme shifts, then do something with the pitching mound, for instance. Just as present-day hitters have to contend with more, make present-day pitchers contend with more.

This is one of my arguments against the DH.  If the pitcher has to hit, then his training alters just enough that it might save his shoulder and elbow from overuse.  He has to run a little more so his stamina might be better.  He has to be more than just an arm.

But I am an old and grew up watching Maddox and Glavine who could actually hit.  And I've very much enjoyed watching Scherzer at the plate in DC.  Mad Max indeed.

  • Love 5
(edited)

If they bunted more teams would stop shifting in a hurry. They don't have to hit homers the other way.

But they don't really teach hitters to bunt anymore bc of the home run worshipping. 

They bunt a little more in the NL I guess.

I've also read other suggestions, around limiting the constant pitching changes, that I like more than limiting the shift. 

But I also don't mind the game as is so I don't have an issue with the shift.

Different subject - I find it funny in the midst of these negotiations and a lock out they're announcing shit like exclusive deals with Apple TV.

 

Edited by cleo
  • Useful 1
  • Love 4

Super. Now it's time to do what Mets fans do: wait for an announcement that the lockout was settled when the MLBPA sacrificed Max Scherzer to appease the owners.

I should also learn to spell the guy's name. I had it down as "Schrezer" before Googling it.

ETAL Yeah, I'm for bunting to beat the shift. I guess that Tony LaRussa threatened to start murdering people if any play broke the "unwritten rules."

Edited by Lantern7
  • LOL 1
  • Love 1
9 minutes ago, emmawoodhouse said:

Opening Day is April 7. We only lose a week's worth of games. 

I've been hearing that they will make up those games, either on off-days or as doubleheaders.

5 minutes ago, Lantern7 said:

Yeah, I'm for bunting to beat the shift.

But if I have a guy who can hit the ball 500 feet with some regularity, I don't want him bunting.

3 hours ago, Moose135 said:

I've been hearing that they will make up those games, either on off-days or as doubleheaders.

But if I have a guy who can hit the ball 500 feet with some regularity, I don't want him bunting.

 

2 hours ago, cambridgeguy said:

Bunting is for your speedy second baseman or shortstop.  Those massive first basemen aren't being paid to not get the ball out of the infield.

Okay. You’re a left-handed hitter. You’re in a slump where you make contact that isn’t heavy. The infield is shifted to the right. Third base side is wide open. You know the catcher is slow as hell. Why should bunting in that situation be out of the question for guys with average speed?

Honest question, no snark intended: is it hard to learn to hit towards the opposite field on purpose?

  • Love 2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...