nokat April 26, 2023 Share April 26, 2023 I thought this belonged here. We need the occasional laugh. 1 18 Link to comment
Leeds May 4, 2023 Share May 4, 2023 (edited) "Prolly." Gah, gah, and more gah. This will never be a real word for me. (And "gah" isn't a real word either.) Edited May 5, 2023 by Leeds 2 2 5 Link to comment
Bastet May 5, 2023 Share May 5, 2023 Twice this week, I have come across - in writing - "unforch" to mean unfortunately. If it happens a third time, it's been nice knowing everyone, as my head is probably going to explode. 8 5 Link to comment
BlueSkies May 5, 2023 Share May 5, 2023 I still recall in school learning to diagram a sentence. Is that a thing anymore? 5 Link to comment
nokat May 6, 2023 Share May 6, 2023 (edited) To make everyone's eyes twitch, here is a gooder ad. Edited May 6, 2023 by nokat 6 5 Link to comment
StatisticalOutlier May 6, 2023 Share May 6, 2023 3 hours ago, nokat said: To make everyone's eyes twitch, here is a gooder ad. I'm not that troubled by the use of "gooder" in an advertising slogan like this. What I am troubled about is capitalizing it in the ad. 1 Link to comment
Bastet May 6, 2023 Share May 6, 2023 50 minutes ago, StatisticalOutlier said: I'm not that troubled by the use of "gooder" in an advertising slogan like this. What I am troubled about is capitalizing it in the ad. I thought it was capitalized because it's the name of a line of shoes from that brand, but it turns out I gave them too much credit. 3 Link to comment
SoMuchTV May 6, 2023 Share May 6, 2023 I think this would fall under grammar. Please permit me to gripe about authors (and their editors) who don't understand how years work. For the umpteenth time, I just read about a character who is about to turn 13, described as being at the end of her twelfth year. No, think about it! You turn one at the end of your first year. You turn two at the end of your second year. There's not some magical time jump happening! And these are best-selling, well-reviewed authors whose work presumably gets well scrutinized before it's published! Same goes for decades. Someone who's turning ninety is not entering their ninth decade, they're finishing it! Thank you. I'll now try to enjoy the rest of my book. 3 1 Link to comment
Lugal May 9, 2023 Share May 9, 2023 On 4/12/2023 at 7:36 AM, nokat said: A word that has its own useful meaning should not be substituted, such as loose for lose. This one I can forgive (and not just because I used to make it all the time) because it seems designed to trip us up. Here's my theory: I think we all remember, even if subconsciously, our First Grade spelling lessons about two vowels next to each other are "long" and one vowel is "short" (despite the fact that English has not had phonemic vowel length for centuries). Loose and Lose are pronounced the same (with actual long vowels) /luːs/ and /luːz/ with one key difference, the second consonant in Lose is voiced. So that long vowel in Lose blends into that voiced consonant making it seem longer than the vowel next to the unvoiced consonant in Loose, and that spelling rule kicks in and we end up getting them reversed. 1 Link to comment
supposebly May 9, 2023 Share May 9, 2023 English has one of the most inconsistent letter-to-sound correspondences in its spelling among the languages that use alphabets for writing. Not only do we get different words spelled identically (bat (animal) vs bat (for hitting things)) but also different words that are pronounced the same but spelled differently (weak vs week), the same sounds corresponding to different letters or letter combinations (tough fast philosophy) or the same letter or letter combination representing different sounds (fear bear). I always felt sorry for all children having to learn to read and write in English. Only French is worse. So why do we spell it moose instead of mose? Why is lose pronounced like loose but rose like toes? It rarely makes sense. 3 Link to comment
partofme May 9, 2023 Share May 9, 2023 37 minutes ago, Lugal said: Loose and Lose are pronounced the same Not when I say them they're not. Loose is more like luce and lose is like luze. 8 Link to comment
supposebly May 9, 2023 Share May 9, 2023 But that's the last consonant that's different, not the vowel represented by either oo or o. loose - goose lose - terrible twos I think the problem for many is the vowel that gets two different spellings. I wonder if there are dialects where even the consonant at the end is the same for both words. Link to comment
GHScorpiosRule May 9, 2023 Share May 9, 2023 16 minutes ago, supposebly said: English has one of the most inconsistent letter-to-sound correspondences in its spelling among the languages that use alphabets for writing. Not only do we get different words spelled identically (bat (animal) vs bat (for hitting things)) but also different words that are pronounced the same but spelled differently (weak vs week), the same sounds corresponding to different letters or letter combinations (tough fast philosophy) or the same letter or letter combination representing different sounds (fear bear). I always felt sorry for all children having to learn to read and write in English. Only French is worse. So why do we spell it moose instead of mose? Why is lose pronounced like loose but rose like toes? It rarely makes sense. HAH! This reminds me of a classic Bollywood movie Chupke Chupke from the early 70s. Wonderful family comedy, where the hero pretends to be a cab driver who wants to learn English. He asks his brother-in-law (wife’s sister’s hubby who he’s never met): If “to” is pronounced “too” and “do” is pronounced “doo”, then shouldn’t “go” be pronounced “goo?”😂😂😂 It’s all asked in Hindi, but it’s hilarious! Drives the brother-in-law crazy! 1 5 Link to comment
Lugal May 9, 2023 Share May 9, 2023 3 hours ago, supposebly said: English has one of the most inconsistent letter-to-sound correspondences in its spelling among the languages that use alphabets for writing. Not only do we get different words spelled identically (bat (animal) vs bat (for hitting things)) but also different words that are pronounced the same but spelled differently (weak vs week), the same sounds corresponding to different letters or letter combinations (tough fast philosophy) or the same letter or letter combination representing different sounds (fear bear). English spelling is something else. Where everything just comes together to make it more confusing. Partly it reflects the way it was pronounced centuries ago. Tough was originally pronounced with a sound at the end similar to the /x/ sound in Scottish loch (And tough is still pronounced that way in Scots). Then you had grammarians who thought spelling should be more like Latin which is how we ended up with the /s/ in island (from insula) even though it was never pronounced there, and island is not derived from insula. And finally there is the fact that English has something like 12 vowel sounds but only 5 letters to write them with. Too many cooks I guess you could say. 3 Link to comment
Leeds May 10, 2023 Share May 10, 2023 15 hours ago, supposebly said: English has one of the most inconsistent letter-to-sound correspondences in its spelling among the languages that use alphabets for writing. Not only do we get different words spelled identically (bat (animal) vs bat (for hitting things)) but also different words that are pronounced the same but spelled differently (weak vs week), the same sounds corresponding to different letters or letter combinations (tough fast philosophy) or the same letter or letter combination representing different sounds (fear bear). I always felt sorry for all children having to learn to read and write in English. Only French is worse. I love the English language, written and spoken, with all its eccentricities and nuance. French makes much more sense than English. It's a beautiful language, but missing some of the madness of English. If you want a language that abides by rules, I can point you in a couple of directions. Link to comment
SuprSuprElevated May 10, 2023 Share May 10, 2023 2 hours ago, Leeds said: a language that abides by rules, I can point you in a couple of directions. I know of one for sure; Pig Latin 3 4 Link to comment
PRgal May 10, 2023 Share May 10, 2023 15 minutes ago, SuprSuprElevated said: I know of one for sure; Pig Latin I haven’t heard that since I was 12! Link to comment
Browncoat May 10, 2023 Share May 10, 2023 I am tired of people confusing "cue" and "queue", and even worse, spelling either one "que", which just makes me say, "What?" 1 1 7 Link to comment
SoMuchTV May 10, 2023 Share May 10, 2023 4 hours ago, Browncoat said: I am tired of people confusing "cue" and "queue", and even worse, spelling either one "que", which just makes me say, "What?" Every time I see “barbeque” my mind says “bar-BECK”. 2 3 Link to comment
Browncoat May 10, 2023 Share May 10, 2023 9 minutes ago, SoMuchTV said: Every time I see “barbeque” my mind says “bar-BECK”. I came in second in a spelling bee when I was about nine because of the prevalence of that misspelling! Well, and because I didn't stop to think about it and blurted out the wrong thing. 1 Link to comment
nokat May 10, 2023 Share May 10, 2023 3 hours ago, SoMuchTV said: Every time I see “barbeque” my mind says “bar-BECK”. Calling it BBQ doesn't help with the spelling issue. 2 Link to comment
SoMuchTV May 11, 2023 Share May 11, 2023 2 minutes ago, nokat said: Calling it BBQ doesn't help with the spelling issue. For sure. And there’s a very popular local place near me that has Bar-B-Que as part of their name. 3 Link to comment
StatisticalOutlier May 14, 2023 Share May 14, 2023 On 5/9/2023 at 1:35 PM, supposebly said: I always felt sorry for all children having to learn to read and write in English. I feel sorrier for adults having to learn to read and write in English. I can't even begin to imagine how hard that would be. 5 Link to comment
PRgal May 14, 2023 Share May 14, 2023 1 hour ago, StatisticalOutlier said: I feel sorrier for adults having to learn to read and write in English. I can't even begin to imagine how hard that would be. This is why I don't want my parents to help with the supplementary learning for my son when it comes to reading/writing. They learned English by memorization rather than sounding things out like my son is taught at school. He's also taught that the language can be tricky with letters having different sounds sometimes. That's how I was taught as well - and I did well, probably better than other aspects of language arts (as they called English in elementary school). And this was without the help of my parents, who focused on math. With memorization, he's picking up my parents' accents because they tell him what a word is. Or letter. He's still saying ickch rather than aych for the letter h. Link to comment
MaryMitch May 16, 2023 Share May 16, 2023 I used to work with a woman who had immigrated from China. She actually learned written English in school before she heard English spoken. Her written English was excellent but we could hardly understand her speech! 2 Link to comment
isalicat May 17, 2023 Share May 17, 2023 Yesterday I was flabbergasted to see a formal notification at a high school signed by the Principal, and "Principal" was spelled: "Principle" There is a principle: a rule, tenet or basic truth (a noun) There is a principal: (a noun) the head of an organization, usually a school (in England I gather they just call them "Head") and there is a principal: the main or primary (used as an adjective) This really bugged me because it was in an educational context. Yes, I am a spelling Nazi. 😺 1 2 4 Link to comment
SoMuchTV May 17, 2023 Share May 17, 2023 50 minutes ago, isalicat said: Yesterday I was flabbergasted to see a formal notification at a high school signed by the Principal, and "Principal" was spelled: "Principle" There is a principle: a rule, tenet or basic truth (a noun) There is a principal: (a noun) the head of an organization, usually a school (in England I gather they just call them "Head") and there is a principal: the main or primary (used as an adjective) This really bugged me because it was in an educational context. Yes, I am a spelling Nazi. 😺 Well, that principle was not your pal! 3 4 Link to comment
LexieLily May 26, 2023 Share May 26, 2023 I was half-listening to the local news last night when I heard the on-air reporter read the copy that said "this senseless crime made no sense." Me: That...would be the definition of the word 'senseless', yes. 2 12 Link to comment
Cobalt Stargazer May 26, 2023 Share May 26, 2023 4 hours ago, LexieLily said: Me: That...would be the definition of the word 'senseless', yes. Show of hands for those who heard that in Peter Dinklage's voice. 5 Link to comment
Bastet May 28, 2023 Share May 28, 2023 Is making a meme celebrating pedants while eschewing capitalization a statement, or just stupidity? 1 2 Link to comment
nokat May 28, 2023 Share May 28, 2023 Or using a phone where capitalizing sentences is a lost art. I still found it funny. Link to comment
nokat May 29, 2023 Share May 29, 2023 I checked my "Woe Is I" book and I've been using "different than" rather than "different from." Okay, either one before a clause. "Respectability is different than/from it was fifty years ago." So different from is always correct. I admit to always trying to remember which is correct. Link to comment
Browncoat May 29, 2023 Share May 29, 2023 Is it wrong of me to expect journalists not to say things like "You might have saw something."? Or, "We seen this other thing."? 3 4 Link to comment
Quof May 29, 2023 Share May 29, 2023 In my experience, we can't even expect teachers not to say them. 1 4 Link to comment
SuprSuprElevated June 4, 2023 Share June 4, 2023 Not so much grammar as spelling, but... 1 2 10 Link to comment
shapeshifter June 23, 2023 Share June 23, 2023 (edited) Is “on through” likely just a typo here, in which one of the two prepositions should have been deleted? “We’re not sure what’s going on through each member of the [******] family’s head…” (Delilah Gray, June 17, 2023, sheknows.com/entertainment/articles/2792858...). Or is it a grammatical error? Or would we have to get inside the heads of the Rolling Stone author and editors to know for sure? Edited June 23, 2023 by shapeshifter Link to comment
nokat June 24, 2023 Share June 24, 2023 1 hour ago, shapeshifter said: Is “on through” likely just a typo here, in which one of the two prepositions should have been deleted? “We’re not sure what’s going on through each member of the [******] family’s head…” (Delilah Gray, June 17, 2023, sheknows.com/entertainment/articles/2792858...). Or is it a grammatical error? Or would we have to get inside the heads of the Rolling Stone author and editors to know for sure? I've seen it used this way; it is unnecessary but common usage. I would certainly understand "We're not sure what's going through" each member.... It does seem to be an awkward sentence. 2 Link to comment
Mondrianyone June 24, 2023 Share June 24, 2023 It's not a grammatical error, more an error in word choice and word order. Normally it would be something like "We're not sure what's going on inside [or within, or some other preposition] the head of each member of the ***** family." 4 Link to comment
Browncoat July 17, 2023 Share July 17, 2023 Does pronunciation count as grammar? The constant mispronunciation of "fentanyl" is driving me insane. It has been in the news a lot lately, and of all the news readers and rehab workers and all the other people talking about it, exactly one has pronounced it correctly. It is not "fentan-all," which implies a spelling of "fentanol." That -yl at the end is more of an "ill" sound. 7 1 Link to comment
StatisticalOutlier July 18, 2023 Share July 18, 2023 3 hours ago, Browncoat said: Does pronunciation count as grammar? The constant mispronunciation of "fentanyl" is driving me insane. Thank you thank you thank you. It's gotten to the point that if a story about it is coming up, I have to gird myself for the assault. And it's all too common among people at the top of the food chain who should know better. Have none of these people ever seen the word written down? But I think it's going to be a "nuclear" "nucular" thing, and we're gonna lose. 7 Link to comment
JTMacc99 July 18, 2023 Share July 18, 2023 22 hours ago, Browncoat said: It is not "fentan-all," which implies a spelling of "fentanol." That -yl at the end is more of an "ill" sound. The VAST majority of us have to rely on hearing somebody who knows what the heck it is to say it correctly. It's not like fentanyl was a word that you would run across in literature or your SAT vocabulary studies when you were growing up. It one of those things that just showed up in the news one day, and we had to learn about it. If EVERYBODY reporting on it pronounce it incorrectly, it's a safe bet that everybody who heard that news story will also say it that way. It never crossed my mind that the 100 times I've heard somebody talking about fentanyl and pronouncing it fentanol was incorrect. And if it were 95 times and 5 times somebody said it correctly, it wouldn't have even registered that they said it differently. 2 1 Link to comment
Browncoat July 18, 2023 Share July 18, 2023 9 minutes ago, JTMacc99 said: It one of those things that just showed up in the news one day, and we had to learn about it. If EVERYBODY reporting on it pronounce it incorrectly, it's a safe bet that everybody who heard that news story will also say it that way. Agreed, but perhaps the news readers and all the other folks who are talking about it should have learned to pronounce it correctly in the first place. Just because news readers and reporters are not scientists (and are proud of not being scientists!) doesn't mean they shouldn't make an effort. 2 2 Link to comment
shapeshifter July 18, 2023 Share July 18, 2023 (edited) 20 hours ago, StatisticalOutlier said: And it's all too common among people at the top of the food chain who should know better. Have none of these people ever seen the word written down? Apparently the overnight meteorologist for Rochester NY had never seen “percolate” written; at the midnight report, he pronounced it as “perculate,” with a long U. His grammar was otherwise flawless. 28 minutes ago, Browncoat said: Agreed, but perhaps the news readers and all the other folks who are talking about it should have learned to pronounce it correctly in the first place. Just because news readers and reporters are not scientists (and are proud of not being scientists!) doesn't mean they shouldn't make an effort. I happened to tune in again around 3am; he did not use “percolate” again to describe the weather, even though the forecast was the same. Kudos to the station’s weather team's shift workers for noticing and fixing it. Edited July 18, 2023 by shapeshifter 2 Link to comment
Bastet July 18, 2023 Share July 18, 2023 (edited) Beyond not understanding failing to ascertain the correct pronunciation of something previously unfamiliar to you if you're going to report on it, I don't understand looking at the spelling and assuming -yl is an all, rather than ill, sound. I'd expect that if the spelling was -ol instead of -yl. Edited July 21, 2023 by Bastet 2 3 Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.