Jump to content

Type keyword(s) to search

Last Week Tonight & John Oliver in the Media


  • Reply
  • Start Topic

Recommended Posts

On 5/3/2023 at 7:40 PM, ShadowKnight2 said:
On 5/3/2023 at 7:13 PM, Lantern7 said:

Does the writers’ strike apply to LWT?

I would imagine so.


Yes it is a a production covered by the WGA.

On 5/3/2023 at 7:59 PM, Annber03 said:

Yeah, I read something about that show going dark, too. 

Plus, just on a personal level, I would think John would give his full on support for the writers' strike, given his general stance on these kinds of issues as it is. 


Yes John is supportive. But it's not just his personal beliefs. There are other issues involved as some of us who were watching John during the last strike may remember - https://www.cc.com/video/ixq99m/the-daily-show-with-jon-stewart-olivers-on-the-strike

  • Like 4
4 hours ago, anna0852 said:

I’m guessing they plan to do a show about the strike and workers rights, or they had some thing that was almost ready to go when the strike occurred and they’re able to just put the finishing touches on that.

That's what in think too.  I had seen speculation in the press that it'd take weeks to get LWT back up and running because of how in-depth the pieces are. 

  • Like 3

John was on Jimmy Kimmel last night. I was surprised to hear him say HBO would rather his show just go away but all the Emmy wins make it hard for them to cancel it. From context I assume it's because the show causes them a lot of legal grief with all the exposes they do. 

I also didn't realize why the show had changed categories for the Emmys until it was explained here.

  • Useful 4
On 1/19/2024 at 11:22 AM, iMonrey said:

John was on Jimmy Kimmel last night. I was surprised to hear him say HBO would rather his show just go away but all the Emmy wins make it hard for them to cancel it. From context I assume it's because the show causes them a lot of legal grief with all the exposes they do.


I would actually bet the legal grief is pretty minor all things considered. I think we have to remember a couple of things - John is pretty self-deprecating, I don't think there would be any danger of cancellation if they didn't win - the show is a money maker, based upon everything we know about online monetization and the streaming viewership. I am sure he gets a lot of grief from various execs - for the programming types they have to deal with people in the industry they want to work with being offended by his jokes. The higher ups have to deal with grief from various investors and their rich asshole friends who are the ones making money from his featured stories more often than not.  But the  bottom line is the bottom line. As long as the show keeps making money Zaslov and company will keep it on the air. If it stops making money they will cancel it if wins the EGOT and makes all the crtics Best Of lists.

  • Like 5

In case anybody is wondering why the main story isn't on YouTube (officially) yet -

HBO Delays Posting ‘Last Week Tonight With John Oliver’ Clips to YouTube in Hopes of Signing Up More Max Subscribers

HBO Delays ‘Last Week Tonight’ Main Story Release On YouTube; John Oliver Hopes Network Reconsiders
 

I think this is another piece of evidence that despite John's self deprecating remarks the show really isn't any danger of cancellation no matter how much he may annoy his "business daddy" and their PR staff at times. They would not be trying this unless there was a crapload of views and some strong numbers concerning audience engagement.

  • Like 2
  • Useful 3
7 hours ago, wknt3 said:

In case anybody is wondering why the main story isn't on YouTube (officially) yet -

HBO Delays Posting ‘Last Week Tonight With John Oliver’ Clips to YouTube in Hopes of Signing Up More Max Subscribers

HBO Delays ‘Last Week Tonight’ Main Story Release On YouTube; John Oliver Hopes Network Reconsiders
 

I think this is another piece of evidence that despite John's self deprecating remarks the show really isn't any danger of cancellation no matter how much he may annoy his "business daddy" and their PR staff at times. They would not be trying this unless there was a crapload of views and some strong numbers concerning audience engagement.

I hope they put it up soon. That's the only way I can watch it.

  • Like 2
On 4/26/2024 at 1:36 PM, Popples said:

I don't understand why Max doesn't have all the episodes on the platform, but I guess this is something.

 

I hope it gets to the past few seasons so I can hear the jokes in the beginning. The last time HBO was free they didn't including John Oliver episodes so I couldn't finally hear them. 

Congratulations! Last Week Tonight won a 2024 Peabody Award for its report on the Israel-Hamas war.

Last Week Tonight with John Oliver: Israel-Hamas War (HBO | Max)
With its thoughtful episode about the conflict in Israel and Palestine, Last Week Tonight with John Oliver offered an important corrective to the media landscape awash in misinformation and decontextualized vitriol just weeks after October 7. Though ostensibly a “comedy” show, Last Week offered one of the best encapsulations of the conflict in all of media. 
HBO in association with Peyance Productions and Avalon Televisio-

  • Applause 7
38 minutes ago, ALenore said:

Congratulations! Last Week Tonight won a 2024 Peabody Award for its report on the Israel-Hamas war.

Last Week Tonight with John Oliver: Israel-Hamas War (HBO | Max)
With its thoughtful episode about the conflict in Israel and Palestine, Last Week Tonight with John Oliver offered an important corrective to the media landscape awash in misinformation and decontextualized vitriol just weeks after October 7. Though ostensibly a “comedy” show, Last Week offered one of the best encapsulations of the conflict in all of media. 
HBO in association with Peyance Productions and Avalon Televisio-

The episode is on the tube of U at this moment here:
https://youtu.be/pJ9PKQbkJv8

 

  • Like 5
  • Useful 1
45 minutes ago, Shrek said:

What was false? 

Oh, most of it. You know where they leave out the part about WHY there was an occupation in the first place and why it lasted as long as it did.

Also, where they leave out the five or six times when the Palestinians deliberately kept the occupation going by refusing the land back.

6 minutes ago, Notwisconsin said:

Oh, most of it. You know where they leave out the part about WHY there was an occupation in the first place and why it lasted as long as it did.

Also, where they leave out the five or six times when the Palestinians deliberately kept the occupation going by refusing the land back.

Hand waving & just saying "oh most of it" doesn't answer the question of what was false, it's a genuine question and you said about bits that were left out but not what was false. I don't have a side here, I'm just asking what was false for my own knowledge of the situation & not a history lesson. 

So again, what was false about what was said? I will settle for any specifics you can give me because I honestly don't know what was false about what was said.

  • Like 3
  • Applause 2
1 minute ago, Shrek said:

Hand waving & just saying "oh most of it" doesn't answer the question of what was false, it's a genuine question and you said about bits that were left out but not what was false. I don't have a side here, I'm just asking what was false for my own knowledge of the situation & not a history lesson. 

So again, what was false about what was said? I will settle for any specifics you can give me because I honestly don't know what was false about what was said.

What was omitted? For example: if someone says "He didn't have it." and you edit it this way: "He didn't have it." You have the opposite meaning.

Lying about stuff like the expansion of settlements (there haven't been any new settlements for decades) and the Palestinian rejection of ALL agreements since the Oslo Accords, gives a false impression.

36 minutes ago, Notwisconsin said:

What was omitted? For example: if someone says "He didn't have it." and you edit it this way: "He didn't have it." You have the opposite meaning.

Lying about stuff like the expansion of settlements (there haven't been any new settlements for decades) and the Palestinian rejection of ALL agreements since the Oslo Accords, gives a false impression.

I didn't ask what was omitted just what was false & you haven't said anything that was false, just a load of gobbledegook and double talking around the actual question. Got it. I haven't defended either side or said one side is right & one is wrong, just a simple question, what was false? 

So nothing was false that you can point to. Simple, end of any conversation because you can't answer a simple question. 

  • Applause 4
Quote

there haven't been any new settlements for decades

Israel OK’s plans for thousands of new settlement homes, defying White House calls for restraint. From June 26, 2023.

We've seen John do episodes smashing the patriarchy, corporate corruption, political corruption, racism, homophobia, sexism...if he wants to go after Hasbara propaganda, more power to him.

  • Applause 4
  • Useful 1
14 minutes ago, Palimelon said:

Israel OK’s plans for thousands of new settlement homes, defying White House calls for restraint. From June 26, 2023.

We've seen John do episodes smashing the patriarchy, corporate corruption, political corruption, racism, homophobia, sexism...if he wants to go after Hasbara propaganda, more power to him.

The misuse of the term "Hasbara" is antisemitic. So don't do it anymore.

Also, the article is about new homes WITHIN unexpanded settlements. Hence no expansion. If you want to continue the conversation go to the main article.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...