Jump to content

Type keyword(s) to search

Josh & Anna Smuggar: A Series of Unfortunate Events


Recommended Posts

(edited)
11 minutes ago, Tuxcat said:

Some people are saying its because they don't have proof of vaccination that is required for a courthouse?

That's my guess. It's a federal courthouse so federal rules supplant Arkansas's policy. I don't think it has anything to do with hiding their faces. 

Edited by Heathen
  • Love 3
44 minutes ago, ChiCricket said:

From The Sun🙄

JUST NOW

Anna Duggar in good spirits

Anna Duggar was spotted in a blue dress with a jacket and looks "a lot blonder," according to the Sun reporter.

She was seen talking to a friend attending the proceedings as well and appeared to be in good spirits.

Maybe she's finally realizing all this time with him in jail is awesome

  • LOL 5
  • Love 3

I just saw that today the defense filed an additional letter of support for the defendant. It's from Denise Wilson, and as far as I can tell, she's the poor widow Josh helped that the other letter writers were were yakking about: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.arwd.62817/gov.uscourts.arwd.62817.157.1_1.pdf

  • Useful 5
  • Love 1
3 minutes ago, Zella said:

He has some interesting picks for court clothes. One of my favorite things said about his getup last time was something along the lines of "Brother's got court at 12, but I've got a drug deal at 6." LMAO

I can't tell if he's supposed to be pushing an ice cart in 1975 or if he's a Velvet Jones wanna be pimp.  

  • LOL 17
  • Love 1
4 minutes ago, MargeGunderson said:

It’s her last gasp at fame. In a few days she’s going to be even more irrelevant.

At least someone related to the Duggar's is outraged at what he's done.  I'm glad she's speaking about the victims, which NONE of Josh's other letters writing supporters even thought about.  But yes, she's thirsty.

  • Useful 2
  • Love 20
10 minutes ago, Jeeves said:

I just saw that today the defense filed an additional letter of support for the defendant. It's from Denise Wilson, and as far as I can tell, she's the poor widow Josh helped that the other letter writers were were yakking about: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.arwd.62817/gov.uscourts.arwd.62817.157.1_1.pdf

Notice there is no specifics at to the amount he is giving.   Wanna bet that Josh never gave a dime, but she was persuaded it came from Josh and told it will keep up if she support him now.

Also pastor's wife in their cult.   She is brainwashed too.

  • Love 11
(edited)

I hope the judge sees this for what it is - not just unlikely to be true- but a further indicator that the people surrounding Smuggar have no concept of the seriousness of his crime and will continue to shield him from any consequences or accountability down the road when he is released.

Edited by SusanM
  • Useful 1
  • Love 21
3 minutes ago, Jeeves said:

This comment in Mrs. Wilson's letter of support for Josh just supports the prosecution's statement that the people around Josh seem to view his conviction as just something bad that happened to him. In this case I assume Mrs. Wilson in the highlighted phrase means the disclosures of the molestations, followed by his being outed as an Ashley Madison member and admitting to adultery - or maybe she also includes his conviction:

allbeenthrough.thumb.jpg.67a923a40f8d16e988682678d10e7898.jpg

Instead of his bad deeds finding him out, he's just a poor victim who despite "all he had been through," has been helping a poor widow and her nine kids. 

This nonsense is enough to gag a maggot. I'm glad the defense piled on by adding this letter.

So tone deaf. It underscores the point for the judge that this man and his family have no thoughts about his victims, about the victims of child sexual abuse, and that they basically only care about themselves.   Such disgusting human beings.  Their "Christian" card needs revoking.  I sincerely hope they all burn in hell.  

For those of you who didn't hear the infamous Larry Nassar letter to the Judge, it's very similar in tone and denseness.

  • Useful 4
  • Love 19
Just now, hathorlive said:

For those of you who didn't hear the infamous Larry Nassar letter to the Judge, it's very similar in tone and denseness.

Here's hoping it works out as well for Smuggar as that letter did for Nassar.

About this last minute letter - wouldn't the judge have already made his decision about the sentence at this point?  Today is him letting Smuggar know isn't it?  Not him giving Smuggar a last chance at mitigation?

  • LOL 1
  • Love 11
13 minutes ago, hathorlive said:

At least someone related to the Duggar's is outraged at what he's done.  I'm glad she's speaking about the victims, which NONE of Josh's other letters writing supporters even thought about.  But yes, she's thirsty.

If I was a victim of a crime, the last person I would want speaking on my behalf would be Amy.

  • Love 7
2 minutes ago, SusanM said:

Here's hoping it works out as well for Smuggar as that letter did for Nassar.

I won't be shocked if the Judge notes that none of the letters supporting Josh mentioned the victims.  And yet, they want the judge to release this man back to the family, who apparently doesn't care about victims at all.  

  • Useful 1
  • Love 14
6 minutes ago, SusanM said:

I hope the judge sees this for what it is - not just unlikely to be true- but a further indicator that the people surrounding Smuggar have no concept of the seriously of his crime and will continue to shield him from any consequences or accountability down the road when he is released.

In his statements, Judge Brooks has made it clear that he's under no illusions about FF's character and those that support him.  It's hard to believe that his lawyers have submitted yet another useless letter.

  • Love 16
1 minute ago, Zella said:

What I want to know is why widow letter wasn't in the first batch? Like, multiple people mention her in their letters, but no letter from her. That seems like an oversight, and it makes me wonder if they had to badger her into writing something. 

She was probably too busy sweeping up cracker crumbs....alone... to initially write the letter.  I'm sure once the Duggars sent someone over to intimidate  help her sweep up crumbs, she had time to write a letter.

  • LOL 16
  • Love 8

I wonder why Joy and Jason are there. I know they made statements agreeing with the verdict, but that doesn't mean they hate Josh or are gleefully glad to have him in prison for years.

I wonder if they're supporting Anna? Or maybe supporting JB? Maybe supporting Josh? Or maybe they are there for the same reasons we are all here today.

  • Love 4
9 minutes ago, Zella said:

If the judge makes scathing comments about the letters, it will almost make sitting through The Sun breathlessly devoting individual posts for every one of Amy's sentences as filler worth it. 

Yes! The problem with "live updates!" of course is - they can't do live updates from inside the courthouse. The judge ordered that those attending the hearing, including the media, must leave all phones and electronic devices OUTSIDE the courthouse, not just the courtroom.  Unless the Sun has put a crew in there so that one by one they can periodically leave during the hearing, go outside for their phones and update the feed? They've gotta sit and wait just like the rest of us. And pad their "live update" with non-news.

  • Love 4
6 minutes ago, MargeGunderson said:

My noon meeting got canceled, huzzah! Although let’s be honest, I was not going to be paying any attention in it. This is far more interesting (even when we are waiting).

I'm so not getting any work done today.  And I desperately need to get work done. I'm not leaving here until 7PM at this rate.

1 minute ago, Jeeves said:

Yes! The problem with "live updates!" of course is - they can't do live updates from inside the courthouse. The judge ordered that those attending the hearing, including the media, must leave all phones and electronic devices OUTSIDE the courthouse, not just the courtroom.  Unless the Sun has put a crew in there so that one by one they can periodically leave during the hearing, go outside for their phones and update the feed? They've gotta sit and wait just like the rest of us. And pad their "live update" with non-news.

I actually think this is a federal court house rule, and not just Judge Brook's ruling.  We can't bring cell phones into most court houses I go to.  I told one judge I think he has people break into cars and steal cell phones during hearings.  He doesn't think I'm nearly as funny as I think I am.

  • LOL 7
  • Love 11
3 minutes ago, Jeeves said:

Unless the Sun has put a crew in there so that one by one they can periodically leave during the hearing, go outside for their phones and update the feed? They've gotta sit and wait just like the rest of us. And pad their "live update" with non-news.

I suspected last time that they were doing this on breaks after they got in trouble. All the new stuff would coincide with lunch or a midafternoon break and then devolve into filler. It wouldn't surprise me if it is the same today but maybe not so many breaks since not a trial, so we have to wait for the bitter end. . . .

  • Love 7
4 minutes ago, hathorlive said:

I actually think this is a federal court house rule, and not just Judge Brook's ruling.  We can't bring cell phones into most court houses I go to.  I told one judge I think he has people break into cars and steal cell phones during hearings.  He doesn't think I'm nearly as funny as I think I am.

It wouldn't surprise me if it's a general federal courthouse rule, but Judge Brooks issued a specific order, for people attending this specific hearing, so maybe he wanted to take extra steps to prevent shenanigans. And head off any arguments later from someone caught with a phone that they didn't know they weren't supposed to bring it in. 

The order: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.arwd.62817/gov.uscourts.arwd.62817.155.0_1.pdf

  • Love 5
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...