Jump to content

Type keyword(s) to search

Say What?: Commercials That Made Us Scratch Our Heads


Lola16
  • Reply
  • Start Topic

Recommended Posts

Wait, what? What ad is this?

There's a series of CARFAX ads that have been running for a few years now (featuring a CGI "car fox"). It's a service that purports to show the history of the car that you're about to buy, so you know if it's been in any accidents or other disasters that might have caused hidden damage.

  • Love 1

There's a series of CARFAX ads that have been running for a few years now (featuring a CGI "car fox"). It's a service that purports to show the history of the car that you're about to buy, so you know if it's been in any accidents or other disasters that might have caused hidden damage.

 

Heh, sorry, I wasn't clear. I know what CARFAX is, but I didn't get the Dracula reference until I read Bruinsfan's post.

 

[Charlie's Angels]Isn't it amazing what you can learn on the.........Internet?"[/Charlie's Angels]

The latest "Truth" anti-smoking ad makes me wonder what they are smoking.

 

Firstly, they tell us not to post selfies that have been taken while we are smoking (because it would be free advertising for the tobacco companies), then they show us a bunch of pictures of people smoking. So it's a case of "Don't do it, and we're going to do it right now." Yeah, that'll show 'em!

 

Secondly, they play some cool sounding music during the ad, as if they were trying to make smoking look cool by giving the pictures a nifty soundtrack.

 

Now I'm kind of tempted to go find some pictures of people who are smoking so I can repost them.

  • Love 4

I just spent an entire commercial trying to decide whether I was watching a commercial for some really bizarre movie or a SNL sketch.  It was a commercial.  The boy that beeps brought to you by GE. 

 

I had a feeling someone would have already mentioned this abomination.

 

The only explanation I can think of for it is that it's just so freaking bizarre that it would have to grab people's attention. But if you want people's attention, why show a half-second-long flash of your logo at the end, without any other indication of what the ad is for? The first time I saw it, I couldn't even figure out which company was being advertised.

Edited by Blakeston

Courtyard Marriott has these commercials I just don't get.  A woman is travelling in a horse drawn carriage in full  costume with her laptop.  A man is sailing on a Viking ship with a glass of wine.  Turns out they are in a lounge and/or bar of a Courtyard Marriott.  I don't understand what message they are trying to send. 

Courtyard leads to full blown schizophrenia perhaps?  Or causes hallucinations?  Temporal shifts?  Puts strong hallucinogens in their cocktails?  Is a secret vortex to hell? 

  • Love 1

According to New York state gubernatorial candidate Rob Astorino, not only is current governor Andrew Cuomo a unicorn killer, Astorino's people resurrected the classic "Daisy Ad" to show that Cuomo also wants to nuke little girls. . . or something.

 

 

My mind is literally boggling right now.

  • Love 3

 

The latest "Truth" anti-smoking ad makes me wonder what they are smoking.

 

Firstly, they tell us not to post selfies that have been taken while we are smoking (because it would be free advertising for the tobacco companies), then they show us a bunch of pictures of people smoking. So it's a case of "Don't do it, and we're going to do it right now." Yeah, that'll show 'em!

If they ran ads that made sense and actually discouraged people from smoking, they'd eventually put themselves out of business. Where did they get those pictures without violating copyrights? Did the subjects effectively get paid for smoking?

I don't know.  I don't see any of these celebrities holding up a pack of cigarettes.  They are smoking a non-identified smoke.  When I smoked, I ONLY smoked a certain brand (B&H Menthol).  In a pinch, though, there was a secondary choice, but only as a last resort.  I just don't see this as advertising cigarettes.

If they ran ads that made sense and actually discouraged people from smoking, they'd eventually put themselves out of business. Where did they get those pictures without violating copyrights? Did the subjects effectively get paid for smoking?

When I smoked, the "Truth" ads always made me want a cigarette. Not once did I feel discouraged by them.

  • Love 1

Latuda seems to make people move in slow motion.  I fear she'll get hit by a car or fall into a pit.  As for triple trouble swallowing, having broken a cervical vertebrae last year and having had a few days when I couldn't swallow (I kept shooting soup out of my nose), that alone makes me fear this drug like no other.  

  • Love 2

Every time I see this Latuda commercial is sounds like she is saying one of the risks is "triple swallowing."

 

 

I listened to it four times, and I couldn't tell if she said "triple" or "trouble". Mostly what I was wondering is why the hell ads for anti-depressants have such a long list of things the medicine might do to you if you take it. Logically I know its probably to avoid lawsuits in case of mishaps, but it seems like the possible side effects of the drug far outweigh the positive things it can do.

  • Love 1
they repeat it later "watch 15 shows at once." How is it possible to watch more than one TV show at once?

I'm not sure if you're asking rhetorically or really want to know, so possibly ignore me?

But they're basically advertising 15 tuners in their device. So normally, you can only record, or do picture in picture whathaveyou, from say two channels at once. Or you could record one thing while watching another, that kind of thing. Some other cable companies have recently come out with boxes that can do 6 at once. Personally, even though I know lots of folks have 500 channels (probably even I do) but the likelihood of wanting to watch/record more than say....4 at once  astounds me. Let alone 15. But hey I guess if all your favourite shows suddenly got moved to the same timeslot on the same day of the week...or possibly if you have a sports channel package wherein you'd want to have access to every game of a certain sport when they're all airing simultaneously, I guess that might be a use for 15 at once. That provider isn't in my area so I don't know if the service really just lets you record 15 at once, and the "watch at once" is poor phrasing, or if it means it does actually let you do a 15 picture in picture making tiny boxes on one screen too, but if it does...I'm guessing the point is probably for the sports scenario actually.

I'm not sure if you're asking rhetorically or really want to know, so possibly ignore me?

Thanks for the response, theatremouse, I was asking literally. We watch the NFL Game Mix channel on Sundays, and it's cool--but sometimes dizzying--to see 8 games on the screen at the same time. And that's just football, where you don't have to stay glued to the screen to understand what's going on. I can't imagine doing that with a TV show.

The burger technology of Carl's Jr. has advanced now to the point where people can use their grease-bombs to join the Mile High Club. So many questions. Does that mean we need to worry about mustard-stained underwear now? Will we get arrested for ordering from the kids' menu? Will porn sites need to add a search category for "greasy buns"?

I am expanding on an earleir post with this excerpt from an article on commercials like the ones below. I highlighted the part that really caught my attention.

 

Some would say this is just a cheap trick to bring some cursing into the homes of quiet Americans who are just minding their own business. Maybe it is, and it's hilarious! Perhaps some other ad agencies could come up with something as clever as this little spot. Sadly, however, they'll probably just settle for the same old thing, and the apathetic viewing public will continue to not demand better.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=-10FadzQAJ4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=I03UmJbK0lA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=GQdhS57hUyk

 

For some reason, the older I get, the less I appreciate cursing. Especially in the youth and in public.

I was watching MeTV this weekend and there was a commercial for the channel's morning lineup. I could have sworn the announcer said "The Gonorrhea Show." But when I looked at the screen, I was relieved that she had actually said "The Donna Reed Show."

Ha.  They have one for the Brady Brunch too.  Yummy.

I was watching MeTV this weekend and there was a commercial for the channel's morning lineup. I could have sworn the announcer said "The Gonorrhea Show." But when I looked at the screen, I was relieved that she had actually said "The Donna Reed Show."

 

*wipes Coke off the screen*

 

Sounds like one of those old health films kids used to have to watch during Sex Ed Week.

Life Alert's current commercial has this line: "Sharon, we've received a smoke signal coming from your kitchen." I don't know about you, but I'm not sure how I feel about an emergency alert service that relies on smoke signals. Maybe they should look into that newfangled telephone technology that I've been hearing so much about.

  • Love 17

Speaking of phones, I just saw a Basic Talk commercial with a guy saying, "If you don't believe me..." listen to this guy, introducing a newscaster who is chomping on a sandwich that he quickly throws off-screen before repeating what first guy told us. We then cut back to first guy, who is... chomping on that same sandwich! That he then hides behind a prop. How is this supposed to make me want Basic Talk?

Edited by riley702
  • Love 2

 

Life Alert's current commercial has this line: "Sharon, we've received a smoke signal coming from your kitchen." I don't know about you, but I'm not sure how I feel about an emergency alert service that relies on smoke signals. Maybe they should look into that newfangled telephone technology that I've been hearing so much about.

Every time I see that commercial, I expect the dispatcher to follow up with, "We suspect the presence of an Indian in your cupboard."

  • Love 8

This is ridiculous.  A court has ruled that Red Bull has to pay its customers $13 million for lying that it gives you wings.  This lawsuit is just silly, but they won.

 

If you want a free $10 out of the lawsuit, follow the link in this article.

 

Wait.....they said it gives you wings? I think Red Bull tastes like crap, so I don't drink it, but wings? Really? I think these people should have spent the money they used to hire a lawyer on a psychiatrist that enjoys a challenge that they believed that, not on the company for claiming it.

  • Love 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...