Jump to content

Type keyword(s) to search

S04.E03: Fairytale


Message added by formerlyfreedom

Stick to discussion of the episode, please. Discussion or mention of future events is NOT ALLOWED in episode topics, including mention of individuals who have not yet appeared or events that occur in future decades. Posts will be removed; repeated violations may incur further sanctions.

  • Reply
  • Start Topic

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, dubbel zout said:

I kind of admire that there was no show of the wedding. It was probably just too expensive/time-consuming/logistically impossible to re-create. And it's not as if you can't watch it on YouTube.

Blah, blah, blah, 😃😉 Same can be said about the other milestones that were shown, also available on YouTube.

Okay, shutting up now.

  • LOL 1
  • Love 7
Link to comment
3 hours ago, swanpride said:

Honestly, it was a little bit over the top for me...menage a trois? Please. Honestly, if that really happened I can't imagine the Diana would have went through with the wedding.

Who knows what they really talked about but Camilla and Diana having lunch at ménage a trois really happened

Link to comment
2 hours ago, Ellaria Sand said:

What a depressing and disturbing episode! I’m going to guess that the “real” Margaret never pointed out to the rest of the family that Charles didn’t love Diana and that the wedding should be called off. Kudos, however, to fictional Margaret even though having this discussion the night before the wedding was just a bit too late.

Too late indeed. If Charles couldn't even court Diana longer without ruining her reputation, there was no way he would break the engagement without getting the hate of half of Brits. In theory, Diana could have, but as her sisters pointed out irl: it's too late, you face is on towels (meaning wedding sovenirs).  

However, Margaret also spoke of the same mistake that the family has done. But it was not the family who refused to accept Mrs Simpson as Queen, it was fully the government's business. And by marrying Diana Charles did the opposite Edward VIII (and Philip didn't force him irl, only said that he must propose or end the affair).

  • Useful 1
  • Love 5
Link to comment
23 minutes ago, Roseanna said:

However, Margaret also spoke of the same mistake that the family has done. But it was not the family who refused to accept Mrs Simpson as Queen, it was fully the government's business. And by marrying Diana Charles did the opposite Edward VIII (and Philip didn't force him irl, only said that he must propose or end the affair).

I’m pretty sure she was talking about her relationship with Peter Townsend. Fictional Margaret put all the blame for that on Elizabeth. 

Edited by Guest
Link to comment
14 minutes ago, Dani said:

I’m pretty sure she was talking about her relationship with Peter Townsend. Fictional Margaret out all the blame for that on Elizabeth. 

I agree. I think that Margaret was talking first and foremost about her romance with Townsend. 

  • Love 15
Link to comment
1 minute ago, Ellaria Sand said:

I agree. I think that Margaret was talking first and foremost about her romance with Townsend. 

That was my impression too. 

Poor Diana. Charles could not have shown less affection or feelings towards her. 

So glad to see two Call the Midwife alumni (grandmother and Camilla)! 

  • Love 19
Link to comment

Okay I've just started watching this episode -- when they are all waiting for the phone to ring -- and I swear I saw a mouse run across the carpet in Princess Margaret's house.

EDIT:  Nevermind.  I see others spotted it first.

 

Edited by WatchrTina
  • LOL 4
  • Love 4
Link to comment
1 hour ago, tljgator said:

Yep, lol. I presumed it was subtle commentary on the decay of the family/institution/etc. (and the notion that it may seem grand to live in a "castle," but there's not always the funds for all the upkeep that's truly necessary for these types of places and it's not all it's imagined to be).

Yeah, that place is huge and old.  I'm sure the yearly exterminator bill alone would be enough to bankrupt a small country.   

  • Love 7
Link to comment

Just a reminder - we are seeing mentions of offspring that aren’t even alive at this point in the timeline. This will get your post hidden for violating the future history directive posted in red in each episode topic. Please save those comments for the appropriate topics. Thank you for your cooperation!

  • Love 2
Link to comment
3 hours ago, Quilt Fairy said:

Did anyone else notice that in the opening scene where they show the family waiting by the phone to hear the news, in the Queen Mother's room a mouse runs across the room in the foreground?   I'm assuming that was intentional.  It made me think of the scene in Victoria when rats poured out of the walls.  

I rewound to be sure I had seen correctly. Laughed and laughed!

  • Love 3
Link to comment
11 hours ago, Dani said:

I’m pretty sure she was talking about her relationship with Peter Townsend. Fictional Margaret put all the blame for that on Elizabeth. 

I realized that, but even then it was not "the same mistake". Edward VIII, Margaret and Charles made different choices. 

  • Love 1
Link to comment
12 hours ago, Quilt Fairy said:

Did anyone else notice that in the opening scene where they show the family waiting by the phone to hear the news, in the Queen Mother's room a mouse runs across the room in the foreground?   I'm assuming that was intentional.  It made me think of the scene in Victoria when rats poured out of the walls.  

 

11 hours ago, tljgator said:

Yep, lol. I presumed it was subtle commentary on the decay of the family/institution/etc. (and the notion that it may seem grand to live in a "castle," but there's not always the funds for all the upkeep that's truly necessary for these types of places and it's not all it's imagined to be).

 

10 hours ago, WatchrTina said:

Okay I've just started watching this episode -- when they are all waiting for the phone to ring -- and I swear I saw a mouse run across the carpet in Princess Margaret's house.

EDIT:  Nevermind.  I see others spotted it first.

 

 

10 hours ago, txhorns79 said:

Yeah, that place is huge and old.  I'm sure the yearly exterminator bill alone would be enough to bankrupt a small country.   

 

8 hours ago, Renee in CA said:

I rewound to be sure I had seen correctly. Laughed and laughed!

When I saw the mouse run across the room, I laughed too.  I just figured it showed how old that place is, and huge and that even little things slip in the details. 

  • Love 3
Link to comment
5 minutes ago, swanpride said:

Though historically, Margaret simply lost interest in her first choice, and Edward VIII got his first choice and him abdicating was actually a good thing for the country. Which leaves Charles and Camilla. And I don't think that Charles being blocked from marrying Camilla excuses in any way him marrying Diana. It's not like he didn't have other options at all, but he went and picked a half-child, believing that he could mould to what he needed with no regard if they even shared the same interests.

Well, yes, with Edward and Wallis, what happened with that relationship may be why the Crown, or the family, felt they had the right or need to strongly guide Charles' choice of marriage partner. How much of what is shown in the show of the family's "push" for him to settle on Diana, remains open for debate, but he was probably under pressure to marry and start a family, and they felt that Camilla would not be good as the future Queen of England.  

  • Love 6
Link to comment
16 hours ago, cardigirl said:

None of them were allowed to marry the people they wanted to and retain their standing in the royal family. Edward VIII abdicated rather than not marry Wallis, Margaret's first choice was sent off to a post in Europe and Charles was not allowed to marry Camilla. The family, in every case. deemed that these matches were not appropriate for the Crown, and changed the course of their lives. How different would history be, if they had been allowed to go with their initial choices? 

In Edward VIII and Margaret's case it was not the family that had the power to make decisions but the government. The young Charles didn't even propose to Camilla nor did his family intervene and she didn't love him but Andrew. 

As for history, it was really fortunate that Wallis wasn't Queen during the WW2 as she had no sense of duty, not to speak her connections with the German ambassador Ribbentrop. Margaret and Charles's case influenced on history, that is the fate of British people, in no way whatsoever.

16 hours ago, swanpride said:

Which leaves Charles and Camilla. And I don't think that Charles being blocked from marrying Camilla excuses in any way him marrying Diana. It's not like he didn't have other options at all, but he went and picked a half-child, believing that he could mould to what he needed with no regard if they even shared the same interests.

 

16 hours ago, cardigirl said:

Well, yes, with Edward and Wallis, what happened with that relationship may be why the Crown, or the family, felt they had the right or need to strongly guide Charles' choice of marriage partner. How much of what is shown in the show of the family's "push" for him to settle on Diana, remains open for debate, but he was probably under pressure to marry and start a family, and they felt that Camilla would not be good as the future Queen of England.  

Irl Charles was perfectly happy to live as a bachelor and Camilla had no intention to divorce from Andrew. 

Philip wrote Charles a letter, saying that he should either propose to Diana or stop seeing her, in order not ruin her reputation. His friends, including Camilla and Kanga Tryon, urged him to propose and those who warned him against, he ignored. The press adored Diana. 

Charles has been drummed to do his duty, and so he chose to act unlike Edward VIII. 

Lord Mountbatten's death was fateful as it made Charles lonelier and therefore ever closer to Camilla. It has been believed that, despite his original advice, Mountbatten would have been against marrying Diana and he was the only one whose warnings Charles would have listened to.    

Ultimately, it was Charles's choice. If he had had a different character, he would have decided not to propose because he wasn't sure.

On 11/15/2020 at 8:38 PM, WatchrTina said:

I presume Charle's prolonged absence during their engagement must be a historical fact.

He had a journey that had been planed beforehand.

But he made a journey also between his proposal and the engagement' official announcement. It was practically the last chance to them both to realize that they had nothing in common and him to tell Diana what kind of life she would lead as the Princess of Wales. But they exchanged no letters nor called each other (it was difficult at that time but surely not impossible). 

As for Princess Mary of Teck, the future Queen Mary, whose example Elizabeth put before Charles to follow, I have never heard that she was in love in Prince Eddy (Albert Victor) and in any case, he wasn't exactly Prince Charming whereas the future George's character suited well with Mary's own, so the arranged match became very happy. Instead, neither of them were good parents even according to the standards of the time. Also the former case, when Queen Alexandra's sister, the Danish Princess Dagmar, or in Russian Maria Feodorovna, was supposed to marry the Tsarevitch but after his death married his brother, the future Alexander III was happy. 

So arranged matches could succeed as well love matches could fail. But in the 80ies the arranged match was out-of date. Already in 60ies and 70ies the European royals married for love, their partners were adults and courting lasted long enough that both were sure of their choice and the partners knew and accepted their future role.        

  • Useful 1
  • Love 17
Link to comment
15 hours ago, Ellaria Sand said:
16 hours ago, Dani said:

I’m pretty sure she was talking about her relationship with Peter Townsend. Fictional Margaret out all the blame for that on Elizabeth. 

I agree. I think that Margaret was talking first and foremost about her romance with Townsend. 

Sure, but it's not a perfect comparison anymore since Camilla is married and thus unavailable. Now Charles has to choose someone whom he doesn't love, remain unmarried, or wait for Camilla to be widowed (not clear that he would have been permitted to marry her even then.) If she couldn't marry the man she loved, Margaret had no real obligation to marry anyone, but Charles supposedly does. She had more of a choice than he does. 

14 hours ago, Quilt Fairy said:

Did anyone else notice that in the opening scene where they show the family waiting by the phone to hear the news, in the Queen Mother's room a mouse runs across the room in the foreground?   I'm assuming that was intentional.  It made me think of the scene in Victoria when rats poured out of the walls.  

https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/tv/news/the-crown-season-4-mouse-rat-episode-3-netflix-b1723511.html

Link to comment

Thing is that even if you go by what is in the show and not by historic realities, Charles and Diana is the only semi-arranged marriage we get to see. All the others are suggested to be love matches and yet all of them fail too. Which makes one wonder if this is less a question of arranged or not and more a question of the maturity of the people involved. And, in the case of the queen, how willing they are to overlook the partner cheating on them.

Or, in other words, the metatext isn't necessarily supporting the text of the show.

Edited by swanpride
  • Useful 1
  • Love 2
Link to comment
3 hours ago, Roseanna said:

As for Princess Mary of Teck, the future Queen Mary, whose example Elizabeth put before Charles to follow, I have never heard that she was in love in Prince Eddy (Albert Victor) and in any case, he wasn't exactly Prince Charming whereas the future George's character suited well with Mary's own, so the arranged match became very happy.

Even if the Queen's story about Queen Mary and her husband finding love through shared duty to country and crown, she didn't seem to realize that the same could never happen with Charles and Diana because they were two of the most self-pitying people ever.

  • Love 20
Link to comment
2 hours ago, ItCouldBeWorse said:

Sure, but it's not a perfect comparison anymore since Camilla is married and thus unavailable. Now Charles has to choose someone whom he doesn't love, remain unmarried, or wait for Camilla to be widowed (not clear that he would have been permitted to marry her even then.) If she couldn't marry the man she loved, Margaret had no real obligation to marry anyone, but Charles supposedly does. She had more of a choice than he does. 

Yes, but it’s more about the story in Margaret’s head. Her speaking up on her nephews behalf is more about her own victimhood than any real parallels between the situations. In her mind she was blocked from marrying than man she loved and ended up in a train wreck of a marriage. It’s one more way of blaming her family for her own choices. 

Link to comment
15 hours ago, txhorns79 said:

Yeah, that place is huge and old.  I'm sure the yearly exterminator bill alone would be enough to bankrupt a small country.   

That’s not the first time I’ve seen a mouse ‘in the house’.  In season 1 episode 2, when the kitchen staff is preparing the king’s breakfast.  Apparently it is after his lung surgery and after Churchill is re-elected as Prime Minister.  
 

I agree with @txhorns79 about the exterminator bill!

  • Useful 2
  • Love 2
Link to comment
2 hours ago, WatchrTina said:

Maybe I've forgotten my history but how was Charles ever "blocked" from marrying Camilla?

His family made it clear that they were never going to accept a divorcee. Yes, he probably could have pitched a fit when younger and married Camilla before she married Andrew PB, but he wasn't in a hurry. Once she married, their fate of not being together was sealed. I think Charles (and Camilla) accepted his marriage as being one of that they had been modeled their whole lives,  that Diana and Charles would get married, have the required children and then develop her own interests and relationships and they would live like many titled folks do, they just carry on with their individual lives and see their spouses on occaission. Diana had other, albeit not reality based ideas of marriage to Charles. Hence the trainwreck. I'm also appalled that it seemed to be known that Diana had an eating disorder and no one stepped in. 

  • Love 10
Link to comment
15 hours ago, WatchrTina said:

1212128741_RoyalWedding1981.thumb.jpg.e9a351df337ec5f157ce62b255e40447.jpg

There you go my friend.

"What" you ask?  Where did I get that photo?  I TOOK THAT PHOTO!!!  Yeah, that's right.  

I.  Was.  There.

 

How awesome! Now why do I remember Diana in her wedding dress also waving? Or was that a fever dream?

  • Love 7
Link to comment
16 hours ago, WatchrTina said:

1212128741_RoyalWedding1981.thumb.jpg.e9a351df337ec5f157ce62b255e40447.jpg

There you go my friend.

"What" you ask?  Where did I get that photo?  I TOOK THAT PHOTO!!!  Yeah, that's right.  

I.  Was.  There.

 

Oh man, I remember getting up in the middle of the night to watch every second. And I was shopping for a wedding dress right around the time of the wedding and I remember all the stores trying to get some kind of a knock off of the Diana dresss in stock. Thanks god I didn't jump on that bandwagon, lol. But her clothes, at that time, were to die for. Some of my friends bought all the books and mags that included pics. Remember, this was pre-internet. 

  • Love 19
Link to comment
8 hours ago, GHScorpiosRule said:

How awesome! Now why do I remember Diana in her wedding dress also waving? Or was that a fever dream?

Do you mean why do you recall her being in her wedding dress in THAT coach?  My recollection is that Charles and his best man (Andrew) rode TO the church in the open carriage while Diana and her father rode to the church in a closed coach with big glass windows (with Diana wearing her veil over her face).  But for the ride BACK from the church to Buckingham Palace, the bride and groom rode in the open carriage (Diana's veil having been adjusted off her face when she and Charles briefly disappeared from view during the ceremony to sign the required documents.)  Later, she changed into the peach going-away outfit for the ride to the train station in that same open carriage, and that's where I got the shot.  

And yes, I actually do remember all these picayune details.  Have I mentioned yet that Diana and I were born one month apart? 🙂

ETA: I thought of another detail.  When Diana rode to the church she wore a front veil that was anchored by a headband of flowers.  When the front veil was removed, the crown of flowers was also removed to reveal an underlying jeweled tiara.  This was done because unmarried women are not supposed to wear tiaras.  (I learned that from Downton Abbey.) That front-covering veil is what you see depicted in the final shot of Diana in her gown in this episode (though you can't actually see the wreath of flowers because the shot is too close-up.) ETA2: Whoops, wrong bride -- the wreath-and-tiara switch was done by Sarah Ferguson when she married Prince Andrew. (Thanks Atlanta.)

Edited by WatchrTina
  • Useful 4
  • Love 14
Link to comment
28 minutes ago, WatchrTina said:

But for the ride BACK from the church to Buckingham Palace, the bride and groom rode in the open carriage (Diana's veil having been adjusted off her face when she and Charles briefly disappeared from view during the ceremony to sign the required documents.)  

Yes! That's the image that is burned into my brain because she looked so happy. Now, watching this episode, to learn she wanted out, well, this is television after all, so now I don't know what to believe. 

Edited by GHScorpiosRule
  • Love 5
Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...