Jump to content

Type keyword(s) to search

The Medal Count


Recommended Posts

I never paid much attention to the medal count but, at the same time, it doesn't bother me.  Plus, it gives fans from those countries something to root for and to brag about, and I'm fine with that. 

  • Love 3
Link to comment

I know with the summers its more of a sport vs. disciplines in that sport.  If you're a basketball player who played two weeks worth of games but are only walking with one medal, are you worth less than a swimmer or track athlete who can possibly walk away with eight medals?  Is a country who only took home 10 medals but they were mostly team events worth less than a country with 70 medals for mostly individual events.  Basically quantity of medals doesn't always equate to overall quality of country delegation.

There are less disciplines in the winter ones.  I'm sure the most anyone could win with individual/team events is six and that's if you're in Alpine skiing, cross country skiing, speedskating or biathlon.  With snowboarding and freestyle most stick to their specialty meaning there are less chances of one athlete dominating.  

So yeah the medal count doesn't accurately represent a country's dominance.

  • Love 2
Link to comment

3 medal haul for Canada today.  Currently running 2nd to Norway.  It's still early but the fact that we're ahead of Germany, USA and whatever Russia is called currently says the Own The Podium is money well spent. 

  • Love 3
Link to comment
On ‎02‎/‎09‎/‎2018 at 11:14 PM, mehtotheworld said:

I truly don't understand the issue with tracking the medal count! Athletes are representing a country, they talk about pride in representing that country, etc. What's the big deal with it?

Some of us mind the emphasis on the medal count because the vast majority of athletes at the Olympics will never win one.  Yet they are just as proud to present their countries as those who do win.  To each, their own.

(That said, I do take a perverse sense of enjoyment in seeing countries like Norway and the Netherlands get lots of medals.)

  • Love 2
Link to comment

My issue with the medal count having turned into a thing is that it's a pointless statistic and it borders on jingoism.  Does the country with the most medals at the end of these games win a prize or get to tell Tonga (as an example) that they suck because they didn't win any medals?

I've always seen the Olympics as individual achievements and not national, but that's just me.

  • Love 2
Link to comment

I like the medal count, but I also like specific events. So for me the medal count is weighted. If we (Canada) only won two, I would want it to be women & men's hockey. :) Conversely if we lose that I'm a bit heart broken no matter how many medals we win.

  • Love 2
Link to comment
6 hours ago, MyAimIsTrue said:

My issue with the medal count having turned into a thing is that it's a pointless statistic and it borders on jingoism.  Does the country with the most medals at the end of these games win a prize or get to tell Tonga (as an example) that they suck because they didn't win any medals?

I've always seen the Olympics as individual achievements and not national, but that's just me.

Setting aside the idea of athletes representing the nation, in the modern Olympics pretty much all athletes constitute a not-insignificant investment of public resources.  Certainly, everybody winning medal for Team Canada has been getting $$$ from the Canadian Olympic Committee.

  • Love 3
Link to comment
16 minutes ago, SeanC said:

Setting aside the idea of athletes representing the nation, in the modern Olympics pretty much all athletes constitute a not-insignificant investment of public resources.  Certainly, everybody winning medal for Team Canada has been getting $$$ from the Canadian Olympic Committee.

In other words, the medal count represents a return on the investment, correct?

Link to comment
23 minutes ago, legaleagle53 said:

In other words, the medal count represents a return on the investment, correct?

Pretty much, yeah.  Governments fund elite athletics because the people like seeing their team win medals and doing cool stuff on the international stage.

  • Love 4
Link to comment

It's a tracker, people. For certain countries, it's a starting point for a more in depth analysis of their performance. When Team USA's medal count has been analyzed, for example, I never hear them saying they destroyed poor Tonga. I don't expect to hear anyone saying a country like Tonga is worthless for not having an Olympic medalist, nor do I think the Tongan athlete thinks that about themselves. But a country like the Netherlands, Canada, USA, etc. not medalling or having a dramatic decrease in medals would most certainly be news. 

I just find the pseudo intellectual argument against medal tracking to be inane. It eats up the medal count threads, when people now just want to celebrate Norway and the Netherlands killing it. 

The most obvious part of it to me is that most athletes will themselves say they are proud of their accomplishment on behalf of their country. Individuals (or groups of individuals) are putting in the work, but the winners will be carrying a flag for a victory lap and/or singing along to an anthem. Look at how Canada celebrated their hockey wins last time around, with the athletes celebrating their wins with an entire country. That's a powerful thing, don't understand why people discount that by trying to say that these events are only about the individual.

  • Love 11
Link to comment
1 hour ago, legaleagle53 said:

In other words, the medal count represents a return on the investment, correct?

Pretty much.  When Canada won the Vancouver bid, they worked hard to make sure athletes could win on home snow/ice to avoid being THAT host country that didn't win gold again. Canada won the most gold that year.  Whether it truly worked is subject to debate, but I do think after seeing the growing trend upwards after Torino, the program worked well enough.  There are still some kinks to work out in the Summer Games, but it's nice to see that my country is FINALLY considered a multi sport threat. 

  • Love 4
Link to comment
Quote

Setting aside the idea of athletes representing the nation, in the modern Olympics pretty much all athletes constitute a not-insignificant investment of public resources. 

That's not entirely accurate though. Not all countries fund their athletes. The US Olympic Committee receives no money from the federal government. It's all private donations. But the USOC is one of only three countries that don't receive government funding. I think that this may lead to a disconnect between how some countries view the medal count vs the US. Since the US athletes are all largely self funded, it's more of a love of the sport for the athletes (many go broke getting themselves to the Olympics) and the fans can just cheer them on. The US likes to see winners, but they don't have any skin in the game.  

Then you look at the other side. NPR had a story about the US biathletes where they detail their financial struggles and creative ways to earn money compared to how most European biathletes get a government salary and a pension. The Finns even gave land to a world champion. There are huge amounts of public money going to these programs, so they better perform. The medal count is the proof needed that they aren't wasting the money. 

  • Love 5
Link to comment

Alex Gough just earned Canada’s first ever medal in luge.

Meanwhile, John Morris is the first man to win multiple Olympic curling gold medals, period.  Kaitlyn Lawes is the fifth woman, after four Swedish women who won back-to-back team trophies in 2006-2010.

Edited by SeanC
  • Love 3
Link to comment
2 hours ago, galaxygirl76 said:

Have the Russians* gotten a gold yet because last time I looked at the medal standings they had medals but no gold.

 

Dutch team is one medal ahead of Sochi at this point of the games.

I'm sure that will change once individual figure skating gets underway.  Skating While Russian is alive and proud!

  • Love 4
Link to comment
18 hours ago, mtlchick said:

Pretty much.  When Canada won the Vancouver bid, they worked hard to make sure athletes could win on home snow/ice to avoid being THAT host country that didn't win gold again. Canada won the most gold that year.  Whether it truly worked is subject to debate, but I do think after seeing the growing trend upwards after Torino, the program worked well enough.  There are still some kinks to work out in the Summer Games, but it's nice to see that my country is FINALLY considered a multi sport threat. 

 

I think it did. (and I also think it just shows CDN Athletes that we do invest in them, a lot of potential athletes were going to other countries because Canada was very staunch on  not doing it). Vancouver did a lot of things good for out athletes.

 

Which: Canada is now at 10. (winning Mixed Curling Gold, Luge Bronze (first one EVAH!) and 500m Short Track Speed Skating Bronze.
this is 1 off the best start Canada's had (1994). and per usual, Canada is winning a medal every day. I love it 

6 hours ago, mtlchick said:

Day four just about done and Canada already hit double digits?!  I may faint. 

it makes me so happy. 

  • Love 2
Link to comment

I'm absolutely stoked that Australia got a bronze medal in the Snowboard HalfPipe. Mainly because our broadcaster has been promoting him to the hilt which usually mean they don't live up to the broadcasters expectation. I found our Silver in the Men's moguls a pleasant surprise, as our broadcaster pretty much ignored him in favour of Brittany Cox in the Women's moguls who did nothing. In fact, I went to bed the nigh of the moguls final convinced Australia was not going to win any medals this Olympiad, so I;m glad the team has proved me wrong.

And my mind is still blown from a medal fact I learnt from the opening ceremony, that Australia has won more Winter Olympics medals than Denmark. Denmark has only ever won one medal (A silver) in the Winter Olympics.

  • Love 3
Link to comment

Pretty cool walk down memory lane. The first one I remember seeing was number 36, which happened when I was 4.

I didn't realize that the U.S. was only the second country to win 100 gold medals. That makes Norway's 121 gold medals truly staggering, especially on a per capita basis. Norway, I salute you!

  • Love 12
Link to comment
4 hours ago, Mittengirl said:

It would have been nice if they had identified each winner and/or played it slower so that we could see each person long enough to figure out who they are.

THIS.  Those images flashed by so fast I was afraid I'd suffer my first seizure.

  • Love 1
Link to comment

Australia picks up their 3rd medal of the games (Silver in Men's Snowbaord Cross). That equals the most medals won by Australia at a Winter Olympics, and we still have our aerialists to compete. Which of course now that I've said that, I have jinxed them and we will go away with nothing.

  • Love 3
Link to comment
15 hours ago, SeanC said:

5a8765a109a92_HalfwayatPyeonchang.PNG.bea20d127d563fc65ad725e4540d1585.PNG

The Globe & Mail's tracking of Canada's progress at the halfway point in the recent Winter Olympics.  Obviously not 1-to-1 since events are scheduled differently, but it's interesting to compare all the same.

I have to chuckle about Salt Lake because the half way point we were struggling like always.  And then the Sale/Pelletier affair happened and we ended up with 17.  We Canadians are polite but I think that was the turning point, not just for that Games, but for the future.  I felt someone was playing "We're Not Gonna Take It" non stop as a battle cry for days because our fortunes turned around then. 

 

Now we picked up another 2.  Great to see.

 

Meanwhile Norway is running (or skiing) away with this board.

  • Love 5
Link to comment

U.S. isn't doing too well in the medal count. Lot of favored athletes (Vonn, Nathan Chen, Shiffrin in slalom) failed to medal, and a bunch (eight as of yesterday) finished just off the podium in fourth.

  • Love 5
Link to comment

I'm tired of every medal count going by most golds.  A medal is a medal.  Top 5

Norway: 22

Germany: 17

Canada: 15

Netherlands: 13

USA/Austria/Japan/OAR: 9

We're pretty much underperforming in every discipline except for snowboarding.  The boost in medals happened from Salt Lake on and I don't know if it's because all those athletes have retired and we haven't gotten another generation of that quality but we stand to have our lowest count since Nagano.  

Link to comment

Braten's win for slopestyle skiing is the first gold medal ever for Norway in a men's freestyle category.  Which shows that, even for countries with incredibly successful winter Olympics programs, there are still new worlds to conquer.

  • Love 2
Link to comment
6 hours ago, AshleyN said:

Goddamn, Norway did not come to mess around these Games.

See, I always saw them as a cross country power house and a  speedskating nation but for some reason didn't consider them at all for alpine.  With that in the mix, it's simply a race for the runner up positions now.  For me, I only want Canada to come out ahead of the USA.  I don't think we can beat Germany but I think we can win more than the Netherlands. 

Edited by mtlchick
  • Love 2
Link to comment
On 2/17/2018 at 10:46 PM, PoshSprinkles said:

RE: USA - most winter sports, from my limited knowledge, are very expensive and cost/location-prohibitive for a lot of people. The nearest ice skating rink to me is two hours away and it's located in a mall and not well-maintained. Any other winter sport, like skiing, would require a move. A lot of parents aren't willing to do that when running in the park is free (cross-country), beginning gymnasts can practice at home with a mat, future Olympic swimmers can practice in the community pool for free or for a couple of dollars a month, and track and field competitors can practice for free at the local high school tracks. Not to mention the dozens of youth programs available in virtually every Summer Olympic sport. That's why, in my opinion anyway, the USA tends to dominate Summer, but not Winter Olympic sports. 

This is true for a lot of the country, but we also have a lot of population in colder weather areas that do have access. I lived in Chicago 10 minutes from a curling club and had a town ice rink and live now in Southwestern CT and off the top of my head can count 5 skating facilities, some with multiple rinks, within 15 minutes of my house. And that doesn’t factor in people the upper midwest, rockies and New England with access to  snow for skiing. I think a key element is the diversity of sports opportunities in the US, vs greater focus on winter sports in places like Scandinavia.

  • Love 1
Link to comment

US can add a bronze thanks to the Shibs and are guaranteed one in women's hockey.  Still brings us to 13 which still seems low.  Where are we underperfoming so much?

Edited by kittykat
  • Love 2
Link to comment

Russia* is really doing everyone a solid here. Lots of medals but no golds yet so we haven't had to deal with the whole Olympic flag/anthem instead of the Russian one yet. 

Ladies' figure skating is almost certain to change that though.

  • Love 1
Link to comment
×
×
  • Create New...