Jump to content

Type keyword(s) to search

Blessed Be: Questions from Non-Book Readers, Answers from Book Readers


Recommended Posts

We have similar threads like this for Game of Thrones and Outlander, so I thought it might be useful for The Handmaid's Tale too. Sometimes non-book readers have questions about the books but don't want to be spoiled, so here is the place to ask!

Book readers, please use the quote function to quote the question you are answering and then put your answers under the spoiler tag. This allows non-book readers to find out the answers to their questions without being spoiled about everything else asked in the thread.

For example:

  Quote

What is Offred's "before" name?

Expand  

 

  Reveal spoiler
  Quote

What is Offred's "before" name?

Expand  

Book answer

  Reveal spoiler
  • Love 10

I have read the book but 15 years ago so I forget a lot of specifics. With Ofglen; was her background as detailed in the book. I couldn't help but feel that her position as the series starts is better than that of most of the other handmaids and I don't remember having that feeling about her when I read the book. If she could ever escape Gilead, 

  Reveal spoiler

On the other hand my memory of her role in the violence in the first episode was different.
 

  Reveal spoiler

That's stuck in my head about that scene but I don't know if I've imagined it or there will be second similar scene to come.

  • Love 3
  On 4/27/2017 at 8:14 PM, AllyB said:

I have read the book but 15 years ago so I forget a lot of specifics. With Ofglen; was her background as detailed in the book. I couldn't help but feel that her position as the series starts is better than that of most of the other handmaids and I don't remember having that feeling about her when I read the book.

Expand  
  Reveal spoiler
  Quote

On the other hand my memory of her role in the violence in the first episode was different.

Expand  

Your memory is correct.

  • Love 8
  On 5/4/2017 at 10:00 PM, ElectricBoogaloo said:

In the book, is the doctor who offers to impregnant Offred portrayed less ambiguously? Is he more obviously creepier/nicer?

Expand  
  Reveal spoiler
  • Love 3
  Quote

In the book, is the doctor who offers to impregnant Offred portrayed less ambiguously? Is he more obviously creepier/nicer?

Expand  
  Reveal spoiler
  • Love 2
(edited)

No one's asked these questions here yet, but I'm going to ask and answer them anyway for those who may be curious.  They have been brought up in episode threads.

What's with the jarring music?

1.  Not very spoiler-y answer: 

  Reveal spoiler

2.  VERY spoiler-y answer: 

  Reveal spoiler

There have been several questions about race in the episode threads, including the oddness of the Moira as a black Aunt in her disguise.

  Reveal spoiler

Another asked in the episode thread.  Is the whole world like Gilead now with the low birthrate, etc?  This answer will also include the issue of infertility.

  Reveal spoiler
Edited by Umbelina
  • Love 8
  On 5/5/2017 at 6:22 AM, ElectricBoogaloo said:

Who was the previous Offred in the book?

Expand  
  Reveal spoiler
  • Love 5
  Quote

I haven't read the book so forgive me if I don't understand this, but one element that seems to be missing is any organized uprising by the good men of the country in the face of the initial curtailment of women's rights.   Are we to believe that all the fathers, brothers and husbands reacted the same as their female relations were turned overnight into property?  "Aw shucks, don't worry, honey, let the menfolk look after you from now on?"   We saw just one man get shot in the protest but where were all the rest?   It begs credibility that all the men would just shrug and say "whatever."

Expand  


 

  Reveal spoiler

So what they've shown in the show is the result of a lot of people being too afraid, too cowardly, and too gullible to do what's right, even if it means dying.

  • Love 12
(edited)
  Quote

Hi. I liked the first 3 eps a lot but this 4th ep left me with 2 many questions...it didn't sustain the realism of the others

Not gagging "Aunt" Elizabeth seemed very contrived. The timing was also off to me..  Dr appt but return at NIGHT....squeeze in a failed Ceremony then at 9 meet the Commander in his study?

I am not a big series watcher cause my logical or nit picky mind gets in the way. I start wondering....who stocks the grocery shelves... who keeps city services running....hospitals? Schools? Where are the children....teenagers? 

Who designs and makes the clothes? 

It seems most of the men are military..police...toting guns....but how will they support a home for wife handmaid...kitchen worker and chauffeur?  Do they even have wives? 

Enquiring minds want to know. 

 

Expand  

 

  Reveal spoiler

Sorry if I went a bit long winded here heh, but the book certainly covers everything in far better detail, I just tried to cliff note the main points.

Edited by AnswersWanted
  • Love 15
  On 5/6/2017 at 3:52 PM, AnswersWanted said:

 

  Reveal spoiler

Sorry if I went a bit long winded here heh, but the book certainly covers everything in far better detail, I just tried to cliff note the main points.

Expand  

Thanks a bunch..  I read it when it first came out...I even saw the original movie which was a dud I thought but I have forgotten much of it I guess. 

The time line and kids still bothers me ...how many sterile..infertile ...years ...? 

Surely there would be teens .. I think this is more glaring on screen than in book. The tv series is good but I wish it had a bit more explaining 

  • Love 1
  On 5/6/2017 at 6:41 PM, Stillhoping said:

Thanks a bunch..  I read it when it first came out...I even saw the original movie which was a dud I thought but I have forgotten much of it I guess. 

The time line and kids still bothers me ...how many sterile..infertile ...years ...? 

Surely there would be teens .. I think this is more glaring on screen than in book. The tv series is good but I wish it had a bit more explaining 

Expand  

 

No problems, my pleasure. I tried to remember it all myself but don't quote me if "The Eyes" come round knocking...

I think that the tv show might very well tackle this subject more in depth than the book was able to, certainly it'd provide them with plenty of material, especially now that they have been renewed for a second season. I'd imagine that it's very likely they will address exactly how bad this "plague of infertility" actually was, what exactly caused it, and why does it seem that the Regime is more so fighting to make things even worse than better.

  Quote

It's ironic, considering the series makes a mockery of Christianity, yet the show seems to have no hesitation about that. 

Expand  

(from the episode thread)

  Reveal spoiler

I hope another book reader answers in more depth if they remember more.

(edited)
  On 5/6/2017 at 8:12 PM, Umbelina said:

(from the episode thread)

  Reveal spoiler

I hope another book reader answers in more depth if they remember more.

Expand  

"Blessed are the meek," a recurring theme, expressed by Aunt Lydia herself (in the series), is a direct quote from Christ's "Sermon On the Mount."   New Testament.

As I mentioned in the episode thread, I haven't read the book so can only judge by the series.

Edited by millennium
  On 5/6/2017 at 6:41 PM, Stillhoping said:

Surely there would be teens .. I think this is more glaring on screen than in book. The tv series is good but I wish it had a bit more explaining 

Expand  

Regarding teenagers in Gilead, I was recently reading the wiki for the book and it said

  Reveal spoiler
  • Love 5
  On 5/6/2017 at 8:52 PM, Umbelina said:

Good catch.

In the book however

  Reveal spoiler
Expand  

Either way, the story goes out of its way to villify Christianity.   I read an interview with Atwood where she defends against charges of being anti-Christian by explaining that the folks of Gilead aren't really Christians because their values are warped, but that seems like semantics.   Few will make that leap.   

I don't really care that the show is anti-Christian.  God's a big boy, He can take it, and besides it's not about Him but about the fanatics who do harm in His name.   It just seems hypocritical to me that the show is tiptoeing on eggshells when it comes to race and other religions but has no compunction about making Christianity the Big Bad.

  • Love 6
(edited)

I don't see it that way, perhaps because I have read the book, and the book makes it very clear

  Reveal spoiler
Edited by Umbelina
  • Love 14

Also...

  Reveal spoiler
  • Love 21
  On 5/6/2017 at 8:50 PM, millennium said:

"Blessed are the meek," a recurring theme, expressed by Aunt Lydia herself (in the series), is a direct quote from Christ's "Sermon On the Mount."   New Testament.

As I mentioned in the episode thread, I haven't read the book so can only judge by the series.

Expand  

Many of Christ's words in the NT are echoed or adapted from the OT.  "Blessed are the meek" can be derived from Psalm 37.  

  • Love 5
  On 5/6/2017 at 9:37 PM, Slovenly Muse said:

I think the purpose of Gilead with regard to Christianity is to look at the ways in which religious extremists around the world have used their cultures' holy books to justify oppressive regimes, and what that might look like in America. Like, Gilead is a thought-experiment: What would it be like if Christian extremists used the Bible to justify a totalitarian regime in America, the same way the Taliban used the Qur'an to justify their regime in Afghanistan (for example)? The practices of the regime are an utter perversion of the true meaning of the texts, but these things happen all over the world. It's not a criticism of Christianity, or a suggestion that this kind of oppression is the natural conclusion of a religious path - it's about the ways in which power-hungry individuals can misuse religion as a tool to harness the support of the very people they seek to oppress. A story not about God, but about humanity.

Expand  

Sorry for the double post, but man....  THIS.  So THIS.  Took my thoughts right out of my brain and stated them eloquently here.  

  • Love 8
  On 5/7/2017 at 3:14 PM, LuvizBlind said:
  On 5/6/2017 at 8:50 PM, millennium said:

"Blessed are the meek," a recurring theme, expressed by Aunt Lydia herself (in the series), is a direct quote from Christ's "Sermon On the Mount."   New Testament.

As I mentioned in the episode thread, I haven't read the book so can only judge by the series.

Expand  

Many of Christ's words in the NT are echoed or adapted from the OT.  "Blessed are the meek" can be derived from Psalm 37.

Expand  

I think the most telling thing about Aunt Lydia's use of that quotation is that, according to Offred, the Aunts who say it NEVER  finish with "for they shall inherit the earth." Regardless of whether or not the NT still exists, it's clear that all its lessons about justice and humility have been stripped, leaving only the parts that Gilead can use to crush people into submission, while making it appear the tyranny is coming directly from God, not the men in charge.

  • Love 16
  On 5/5/2017 at 3:13 PM, Ripley68 said:

RE: The doctor

  Reveal spoiler
Expand  
  Reveal spoiler
  Quote

29 minutes ago, MV713 said:

I haven't had time to read everyone's comments about each episode.  I read the book in 1986 but I forget and just wondered a couple of things:

1.How did one become a "commander's wife"?  Seems they would want the fertile women as wives.  Also, are the Martha's not fertile?

2. They have mentioned a few places in the series so far, but does anyone know where this is supposed to be?

Thank you...

Expand  

1.  The ones we know about? 

  Reveal spoiler

2.  Gilead

  Reveal spoiler

2.  (More detail)  The colonies

  Reveal spoiler

Someone else may have more detail for you.

  • Love 4

I am not sure if this is book talk or movie talk but something occurred to me when I was watching the ceremony.

What if the Handmaid fell asleep, yawned or even snored? I am just saying as a passive aggressive form of protest.  They cannot fault her since she is only suppose to be there as a walking womb. The commander isn't suppose to desire her either - she's just a tool.  
Random thoughts. This show is awesome. Much better than the old movie. 

  • Love 3
  On 5/8/2017 at 7:09 PM, greekmom said:

I am not sure if this is book talk or movie talk but something occurred to me when I was watching the ceremony.

What if the Handmaid fell asleep, yawned or even snored? I am just saying as a passive aggressive form of protest.  They cannot fault her since she is only suppose to be there as a walking womb. The commander isn't suppose to desire her either - she's just a tool.  
Random thoughts. This show is awesome. Much better than the old movie. 

Expand  
  Reveal spoiler
  • Love 2

One thing I forgot to mention... did anyone notice in the show that none of the wives have any pets? There are no cats, no dogs, no pet birds in Gilead. So besides praying for a baby all day, what the heck do the wives do? They have the Marthas to cook and clean.  There is no livestock for them to care of. No gardens. They can't read and I guess television doesn't exist except to advise of updates on the war?!  No wonder they torture the Handmaidens -- nothing else to really do.

  • Love 3
  On 5/9/2017 at 12:28 AM, greekmom said:

One thing I forgot to mention... did anyone notice in the show that none of the wives have any pets? There are no cats, no dogs, no pet birds in Gilead. So besides praying for a baby all day, what the heck do the wives do? They have the Marthas to cook and clean.  There is no livestock for them to care of. No gardens. They can't read and I guess television doesn't exist except to advise of updates on the war?!  No wonder they torture the Handmaidens -- nothing else to really do.

Expand  

Serena Joy

  Reveal spoiler
  • Love 6
  On 5/9/2017 at 12:45 AM, Umbelina said:

Serena Joy

  Reveal spoiler
Expand  

That's right I totally forgot that part.

Geez. I'm shocked SJ hasn't hung her own self from extreme boredom in this brave new world. 

  • Love 6
  On 5/9/2017 at 12:45 AM, Umbelina said:

Serena Joy

  Reveal spoiler
Expand  
  Reveal spoiler
  • Love 1

It's been a long long time since I read the book, and they haven't explained how Serena Joy came to be in this series, but in the book I thought Offred remembered her as being kind of a Tammy Faye in her previous life. A tv preachers wife or some kind of evangelical singer. If they brought that here she would have had a head start on the religious nonsense. 

What are the options for the men like the driver? If you're a regular dude you're not worthy of a breeder type of woman so are they allowed to date Martha's or aunts? 

  On 5/9/2017 at 3:27 AM, nachomama said:

What are the options for the men like the driver? If you're a regular dude you're not worthy of a breeder type of woman so are they allowed to date Martha's or aunts? 

Expand  

According to the book,

  Reveal spoiler
  • Love 2
(edited)
  On 5/9/2017 at 12:28 AM, greekmom said:

One thing I forgot to mention... did anyone notice in the show that none of the wives have any pets? There are no cats, no dogs, no pet birds in Gilead. So besides praying for a baby all day, what the heck do the wives do? They have the Marthas to cook and clean.  There is no livestock for them to care of. No gardens. They can't read and I guess television doesn't exist except to advise of updates on the war?!  No wonder they torture the Handmaidens -- nothing else to really do.

Expand  

I hadn't even noticed that there were no pets. Huh. Have you seen Children of Men? In it all of humanity has become infertile, and it leads to a breakdown in civilization. One of the most shocking scenes for me was when the main character is walking down a street in London, and he sees a couple with a baby carriage with other people crowded around happily cooing and exclaiming. As the camera pulls closer you see that the carriage contains a momma cat and her kittens. Just blew me away, but then I thought sure, why not.

Atwood is telling a different story, of course, but now I wonder if there are no pets for the women to lavish affection on because that's one more thing denied them by the patriarchy or if Atwood just decided that there was already enough going on in the story.

Edited by maystone
clarity
  • Love 3

I haven't read the book yet (it's been sitting on Mt. TBR for years). I was going to wait until the series was over to read it, but now I'm considering reading along as the show airs each week. Does the show follow the book pretty linearly? Meaning can I read the first few chapters and not get spoiled?

  • Love 1
  On 5/9/2017 at 3:37 PM, ElectricBoogaloo said:

I haven't read the book yet (it's been sitting on Mt. TBR for years). I was going to wait until the series was over to read it, but now I'm considering reading along as the show airs each week. Does the show follow the book pretty linearly? Meaning can I read the first few chapters and not get spoiled?

Expand  

The show jumps around a bit with the book's timeline. The Particicution and introduction of the new Ofglen happen much later in the book; the doctor's visit happens earlier, etc. 

  • Love 2
  On 5/9/2017 at 5:35 PM, ferretrick said:

So was Moira recaptured later and sent to the Colonies? Or do we not trust what Janine said? Confused on the timeline.

Expand  
  Reveal spoiler
  • Love 3

The one part of the book that never made sense to me was how Gilead came into being given the sheer size of the US and the diversity of the population.  The number of people that they would have had to have, when their movement and planning was underground, not just to pull off the coup, but to basically enslave American society into this new Gilead world order would have had to have been massive.  And to think that so many people would have believed in this is what I find most horrifying.  In many ways I wish Margaret Atwood would write a prequel to the book.  We get glimpses in the story, we get some technicalities, but we don't get the how the belief system in society got to a point where this would gain enough traction.  

For example - they let go every single woman from the workforce and froze every single bank account in the same day.  And while doing that, they dispatched the Gilead army to every workplace in America to ensure that everybody fell in line and nobody was disruptive.  Think about the number of people that would be necessary to do such a thing.  They didn't go town by town.  It was all at once.  How?  

Or perhaps I'm forgetting a part of the story, I probably haven't read the book in a good 10-12 years.   Maybe this is where fiction and potential reality blur. 

  • Love 3
(edited)
  On 5/9/2017 at 6:20 PM, Shangrilala said:

The one part of the book that never made sense to me was how Gilead came into being given the sheer size of the US and the diversity of the population.  The number of people that they would have had to have, when their movement and planning was underground, not just to pull off the coup, but to basically enslave American society into this new Gilead world order would have had to have been massive.  And to think that so many people would have believed in this is what I find most horrifying.  In many ways I wish Margaret Atwood would write a prequel to the book.  We get glimpses in the story, we get some technicalities, but we don't get the how the belief system in society got to a point where this would gain enough traction.  

For example - they let go every single woman from the workforce and froze every single bank account in the same day.  And while doing that, they dispatched the Gilead army to every workplace in America to ensure that everybody fell in line and nobody was disruptive.  Think about the number of people that would be necessary to do such a thing.  They didn't go town by town.  It was all at once.  How?  

Or perhaps I'm forgetting a part of the story, I probably haven't read the book in a good 10-12 years.   Maybe this is where fiction and potential reality blur. 

Expand  

The book and the show have both gone into it a bit.  I don't think I have to spoiler tag this because I'm pretty sure it was said on the show.

They blamed terrorists.  Congress and the President were all killed in a coup.  They (Offred's commander and his pals) took over for "security" and people didn't fight it much, most of the constitution and our freedom was suspended at first, and then permanently,  in the name of security.  News was obviously controlled and no one really completely understood what was really happening.  Paper money was already gone, everything was cards, so it was very very easy to freeze all the female money and turn it over to men, basically the push of a computer button since their accounts were all marked with an F for female.  Firing them, same thing.  Once regular protections were gone, they could do anything.  They controlled the new army/militia/angels. 

All for our own protection from those damn terrorists you know.

It was a planned, well thought out coup, carried out easily.  Protesters existed, but as we saw on the show they were mowed down, murdered which put a stop to that pretty fast.  Kent State en masse.  Freedom to assemble, protest, etc. was all "suspended" (ended forever really) in the name of security.

Alaska and Hawaii became the new USA, with Anchorage as capital.  The Gilead people didn't really control the entire country I don't think, which is why they keep referring to fighting and "the colonies."  So, controlled yes, but by war, it didn't all look like Boston where we see Offred and this show set.

Edited by Umbelina
  • Love 9
  On 5/9/2017 at 7:32 PM, Umbelina said:

They blamed terrorists.  Congress and the President were all killed in a coup.  They (Offred's commander and his pals) took over for "security" and people didn't fight it much, most of the constitution and our freedom was suspended at first, and then permanently,  in the name of security.  News was obviously controlled and no one really completely understood what was really happening.  Paper money was already gone, everything was cards, so it was very very easy to freeze all the female money and turn it over to men, basically the push of a computer button since their accounts were all marked with an F for female.  Firing them, same thing.  Once regular protections were gone, they could do anything.  They controlled the new army/militia/angels. 

Expand  

Right, I remember that part.  They blamed middle eastern terrorists when it turned out to be a homegrown coup - the book doesn't get into that much other than to say that they gunned down congress (I always assumed they basically massacred everybody during a state of the union, or maybe I read that?...hmmm...where's Kiefer Sutherland when you need him?) and they only really give a one line nod to the terrorists in the context that nobody thought to question and they let fear take over while they slowly stripped away rights.  Atwood sums it up pretty quickly in the book, if I recall and on the show they cover it in the conversation between Moira and June.  But when "they" take over for security of the country...how did they come to be at such a substantial size?  

I always assumed that a new regime took over entirely.  For example,  Offred says in the show as she exits her office that she doesn't think that's the army, she thinks it is a "new kind of army."  Did she mean same people, new mission and directives?  I always assumed it was entirely new regime.  A new army -- soldiers who agreed with the so-called values of the Gilead leadership.  Perhaps that's where I'm off.  Maybe instead it was current military - the US army, navy, air force - doing their jobs and following orders of the new leadership.  But we also know there is a war going on, so if that's the case, there were clearly divides in the military.  So again, that brings me back to my question of how did so many people get behind this to begin with, not just to pull off the slaughter of the government, but to also enslave the american public into Gilead - how did they have so much might behind it from the get go?  

  Quote

I think we are watching the prequel right now on the news every day.

Expand  

Perhaps I'm just too optimistic in my belief that at the end of the day, common decency wouldn't allow something like this to happen in a country that has enjoyed relative freedom for nearly 250 years.  Afterall, optimism is a crucial survival mechanism.

  • Love 4
  On 5/11/2017 at 3:12 AM, MissE said:

Is it ever said what happens to Hannah in the book?

Expand  
  Reveal spoiler
  • Love 2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...