Jump to content

Type keyword(s) to search

Kim Kardashian Thomas Humphries West


Recommended Posts

http://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity-moms/news/kim-kardashian-shares-intimate-new-photos-of-north-wests-baptism-2015156

 

I'm cracking up at Kim in this picture. I get why she's wearing the veil, as orthodox churches have very strict dress guidelines, but I can't help but think that she's trying to channel Mary herself in these pictures, she's probably up there thinking "Oh blessed child of Yeezus."  

 

And Kanye.  OMFG.  You are in a church.  In the Holy Land.  For you daughter's baptism.  Could you have at least put pants on that don't have a DAMN HOLE IN THEM????  For somebody constantly running his mouth about "respect" he clearly has a thing or two to learn about that, AND maturity.  

 

The pic of North asleep in Kim's arm is sweet.  

  • Love 9

What exactly was Kims doctor biopsying? How many doctors is she seeing? There's a new one every week.

The whole fertility thing is a joke. Noticed that they never discuss Khloes alleged inability to conceive? Since that was also a joke, but for different reasons.

Kim screaming in the almost accident will never not be funny. Along with Kylie's total disgust at her meltdown.

If I were driving and that happened, the first thing I'd do on getting the car stopped would be to punch Kim in the face. When I'm trying to keep us alive the last thing I need to hear is hysterical screaming.

  • Love 5

I thought Kim was a member of her mom's progressive evangelical non-denominational church, but now she's doing high-church infant baptism in a mantilla? What is this I don't even… I guess the joke's on me for expecting theological consistency from the wife of the man who went from "Jesus Walks" to "I am a god" in under 10 years. 

  • Love 4

I have no words for this. I like the fake typing and the head nodding. Thank you Glamour for making me laugh today.

 

Kim Kardashian’s Letter to Her Future Self

 

 

I'm wondering how many takes they had to do with Kim during that whole thing.    She's only going 10 years into the future?  She probably would not be able to handle going ahead 20-25 years.  Shame on you Glamour for using Kim.  Shocking there was no mention of Kanye or her 4th (or 5th) husband.  But hey, at least she mentioned how many followers she expected her future self to have.

  • Love 4

In the words of Nelson from The Simpsons?
 
Ha, ha!
 
Armani Just Gave Kim Kardashian A Spelling Lesson On Twitter
 

It just got real shady on Kim Kardashian’s Twitter feed.

The reality star went on Twitter to share her discontent with the fact that her favorite Armani foundation was discontinued. However, there was one small problem with the tweet, and it was the spelling of Giorgio Armani’s first name.

Kardashian made a small, ok MAJOR, typo when she spelled his name “Georgio,” and we are sure even Kanye West cringed at the tweet.

 

 

 

@KimKardashian Dear Kim – let us know which one you need and we’ll send it to you. And Mr. Armani’s first name is Giorgio.
— Armani (@armani) June 15, 2015

 

Well, the social media gurus at Armani were quick to respond to Mrs. West’s request for more foundation, but they had to make sure that her spelling error was known to her over 32 million followers.

Followers of Armani were loving the shade, tweeting, “digging the sass from Armani tho” and “The only thing missing from the shade that @armani threw at @KimKardashian was the Black Girl ‘Finger Snap’ at the end .”

We would give Kardashian the benefit of the doubt. Maybe it was spell check, or maybe it was the pregnancy hormones that led to the spelling error. However, when you are sitting front row at fashion shows, there is no excuse.
  • Love 3

That Glamour video was ridiculous. Did she say 100 million or 100 billion followers? I wasn't sure & could not make myself watch again. It has to be million, however I can imagine her thinking that in 10 years there would be 100 billion people & they all would be on social media. Maybe she's done the math & it's totally possible. Cause she's literally a genius. Bible.

I wonder if those were actually her hands in the fake typing. If so she needs to take better care of them. They looked older than her face. Then again there's very little of her left in her face.

Her little comments about her sisters were so deep & knowledgable. It's obvious she knows them well & they are super dooper close. Besties forever. I think her snide remark about Kourtney being done having kids was the only non-generic, could apply to anyone remark she made.

  • Love 1

I sincerely don't understand how Kim considers herself fashionable. She literally wears the same thing every day - these ridiculous plain knit body conscious tank dresses. Snore.

I am perplexed as to why she looks so bad in other outfits, however. The clothes always wear her and not the other way around.

Anyway, she is just going to have to accept the fact that she is not tall with a long torso like Kate Middleton. She will have a pudgy pregnancy (not that there's anything wrong with that. People are so judge mental, it's terrible).

  • Love 2

Anyway, she is just going to have to accept the fact that she is not tall with a long torso like Kate Middleton. She will have a pudgy pregnancy (not that there's anything wrong with that. People are so judge mental, it's terrible).

People are so judgemental of KIm not because she has a pudgy pregnancy, but because she keeps dressing like she's not pregnant. Even with her long torso Princess Kate wore pregnancy clothing. Kim just got bigger sizes of regular clothing & she looked ridiculous. You never saw picture of Princess Kate with her flesh bulging out between the straps of her shoes, but Kim wouldn't wear flats. If people judge her for the way she looks when she's pregnant, it's because Kim decides to look like a fool instead of a pregnant woman.

  • Love 7
(edited)

Ok so it's something Kim is hosting, not some big thing, LMAO. For $40 you can hear a useless talent tell about a porn tape, reality show, getting married 3 times, pose nude countless times, print a book of pics of herself called Selfish (hahahaha).  And she is talking about objectification.  Is she giving her dumbass followers pointers?  A no-talent hack decided to do a seminar and rented out this place.  Talking about objectification...WTF.  Why does she get this opportunity to talk to potential gullible people.  Just say no people, just say no.

 

http://www.people.com/article/kim-kardashian-west-objectification-live-lecture-event

Edited by Crucial
  • Love 2

For $40 you can hear a useless talent tell about a porn tape, reality show, getting married 3 times, pose nude countless times, print a book of pics of herself called Selfish (hahahaha).

 

 

...or you can see and read it on the internet for FREE.  Is there anything about this babe that hasn't already been covered, recovered, uncovered?

  • Love 4
(edited)

Ok so it's something Kim is hosting, not some big thing, LMAO. For $40 you can hear a useless talent tell about a porn tape, reality show, getting married 3 times, pose nude countless times, print a book of pics of herself called Selfish (hahahaha).  And she is talking about objectification.  Is she giving her dumbass followers pointers?  A no-talent hack decided to do a seminar and rented out this place.  Talking about objectification...WTF.  Why does she get this opportunity to talk to potential gullible people.  Just say no people, just say no.

 

http://www.people.com/article/kim-kardashian-west-objectification-live-lecture-event

I was surprised to hear about Kim's "lecture" too. Why would anybody want to hear about objectification of women from a woman whose goal seems to be exactly that? Is it supposed to be all right to make yourself into a sex object as long as you make a lot of money doing it? Pathetic if you're poor, but admirable if you get rich? Ugh!

Edited by Coffeecup
  • Love 6

There is no leak. This family does not care about privacy or discretion at all. Kim and co say this to appear more human. But really they'd be willing to get pissed on, pose nude, have a Pap smear on camera, sell out mentally ill members of their family or entourage if it'd get them a dollar or headline. I'm not being a bitch in saying this its what I truly believe.

  • Love 7

 

There is no leak. This family does not care about privacy or discretion at all. Kim and co say this to appear more human. But really they'd be willing to get pissed on, pose nude, have a Pap smear on camera, sell out mentally ill members of their family or entourage if it'd get them a dollar or headline. I'm not being a bitch in saying this its what I truly believe.

Yep, yep and yep.

Double publicity this way.   First the "leak."   The the publicity of the denial.   The the publicity of their own announcement.    It's all done so there is a K in the headlines every week.

  • Love 2

Kardashian Kids' Klothes needs to start working on a line of infant pleather jogging pants and hoodies pronto!

Wow, I thought you were making that up:

 

042715G_BP_BRU_KardashianKids_01.jpg042715G_BP_BRU_KardashianKids_02.jpg

 

 

Except they only IMPLY the "Klothes" part.  But they do dare to talk about baby clothes being "chic" and "trending".

They don't visibly call it a "Kollection" either, although... I bet they want to.

I wonder if Kim will ever look back on this time in her life and regret dressing so damn ugly all the time. She never looks like she feels good about herself, and these clothes make her look so dumpy and like she got dressed in the dark because the fire alarm was going off. Pregnant or not, is it such a crime to look put-together and comfortable?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...