Jump to content

Type keyword(s) to search

Why Grammar Matters: A Place To Discuss Matters Of Grammar


Message added by JTMacc99,

Nbc Brooklyn 99 GIF by Brooklyn Nine-Nine

  • Reply
  • Start Topic

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, shapeshifter said:

I don't know if this makes it any less depressing, but consider that the FaceBook poster was aware that correctly spelling a word of 8 or more letters was beyond that poster's abilities and so used a variation of phonetics to convey a thought. "A" for effort? —especially if the poster's message was uplifting and/or informative. 

We used to call this stupid.

  • Love 8
Link to comment
11 minutes ago, Milburn Stone said:

We used to call this stupid.

Yes, "used to." I had a college classmate in the 1990s who was a dyslexic woman who went to college after she learned to read with her children. She needed to listen to books-on-tape, but her intelligence was higher than most.

  • Love 3
Link to comment

It's not really a grammar thing, but your post about the Weather Channel reminds me that a month or so back when we were getting severe storms here in Iowa, while talking about one of our counties being under a warning, the guy talking completely mispronounced the word "Winnebago". He said "Kossuth" wrong, too.  

Link to comment
On 9/14/2018 at 5:58 PM, SrOfficial said:

Somebody on FB just referred to a handy cap parking spot.

I've been sitting here thinking "wth is a handy cap?" Since this forum is about bad grammar, I got that it was wrong, but I really couldn't figure out what this could possibly be. Until I kept reading the comments. Then I suddenly thought "oh. OH" & laughed my ass off.

On 9/16/2018 at 6:23 AM, SrOfficial said:

I think it's a matter of not being aware (or flunking Spelling).  They see sign saying "handicapped" parking, but it doesn't register.  I have a whole list of these types of things.  Examples:  pedal stool (pedestal) , lued behaviour, fame hoar, in vein (in vain), knit-pick.  Too depressing.

My favorite was when I kept seeing people typing "wallah" or "walla" on comments. I had no idea what that meant until somebody explained to me that the word they thought they were using was "voila". 

  • Love 8
Link to comment
1 hour ago, GaT said:

My favorite was when I kept seeing people typing "wallah" or "walla" on comments. I had no idea what that meant until somebody explained to me that the word they thought they were using was "voila". 

Oh, good lord!  

I have a new one -  "physical" for "fiscal" - sheesh!

Edited by SrOfficial
  • Love 3
Link to comment
31 minutes ago, SrOfficial said:

Oh, good lord!  

I have a new one -  "physical" for "fiscal" - sheesh!

Have you seen that? I would think spelling challenged typists would begin with an "f" rather than "ph" and let predictive text do the rest.
It seems the opposite would be more likely.

Link to comment
1 hour ago, shapeshifter said:

Have you seen that? I would think spelling challenged typists would begin with an "f" rather than "ph" and let predictive text do the rest.
It seems the opposite would be more likely.

I have no idea how they arrived at this spelling.  I think, perhaps, they are not familiar with the word, "fiscal" & actually think the words sound the same.

  • Love 2
Link to comment
On 9/16/2018 at 6:34 AM, shapeshifter said:


But I'm really not sure what was intended with "It's an canny." 

  • Its canny
  • Its uncanny

Even the spelling-handicapped poster above who typed "handy cap" at least made clear what was intended.

Not sure if you're being ironic here, but I think you want "It's canny" and "It's uncanny".

  • Love 3
Link to comment

Yesterday, I got very mad for a minute, before I realised there was no reason to - or so I hoped.

Background: while checking my account, I noticed that a client who usually pays me on time hadn't. I send a mail asking if they had given transfer instructions.

The reply I got was "Not sure I'll do it if it hasn't been done yet. I'm currently away in [...] so have limited Internet access."

So there I was, mad that the guy wouldn't make the payment until he was back. Until I thought, well that's not how that usually works with them, maybe he just forgot a comma.

And lo and behold, early this morning he sent another payment email saying he had made the payment.

People, commas matter!

Edited by NutMeg
slip on the tongue, sorry :)
  • Love 9
Link to comment
On 9/21/2018 at 10:48 PM, Brookside said:

It drives me mad when people use possessives wrongly, as in:

"He was a friend of my son's," or, "I got it from a cousin of my dad's."

Son's what?  Dad's what?

LOL. I’ve made that mistake a few times. 

 

I looked up the word nonplussed because I had a feeling I was about to use it I correctly in a post (I was). 

And this is the definition I found:

 

non·plussed

nänˈpləst/

adjective

1. (of a person) surprised and confused so much that they are unsure how to react.

"he would be completely nonplussed and embarrassed at the idea"

2. INFORMAL•NORTH AMERICAN

(of a person) not disconcerted; unperturbed.

 

So we NORTH AMERICANS misuse this word so often that there is now an informal definition made just for us? How embarrassing. 

  • Love 5
Link to comment
18 minutes ago, topanga said:

So we NORTH AMERICANS misuse this word so often that there is now an informal definition made just for us? How embarrassing.

I don't remember the last time I heard it used correctly; it seems as if every single time I hear/see it, it's being used to mean the exact opposite of what the word actually means.  That informal definition has taken complete hold here.

  • Love 3
Link to comment
24 minutes ago, Bastet said:
46 minutes ago, topanga said:

So we NORTH AMERICANS misuse this word so often that there is now an informal definition made just for us? How embarrassing.

I don't remember the last time I heard it used correctly; it seems as if every single time I hear/see it, it's being used to mean the exact opposite of what the word actually means.  That informal definition has taken complete hold here

I work in academia near Chicago and do not recall ever hearing it misused. Maybe its regionalism is more specific than just North America? We have a lot of first-generation, scholarship students from nearby areas who use non-standard English, but that is not one of the word usage variations that I have heard.
Anyway, I just used it correctly on the Manifest board—or perhaps I should say I used it with its original definition.

Edited by shapeshifter
  • Love 2
Link to comment
52 minutes ago, topanga said:

So we NORTH AMERICANS misuse this word so often that there is now an informal definition made just for us? How embarrassing. 

Not only is our informal definition made just for us--it's the complete opposite of correct!

  • Love 3
Link to comment
1 hour ago, Browncoat said:

One of our local news readers just said that Hurricane Michael "ann-hill-iated" parts of Florida.  I'm pretty sure she meant "annihilated".

Maybe it was a clever ploy to echo the destruction of the hurricane with a destruction of the English language.

  • Love 10
Link to comment
On 9/16/2018 at 12:06 PM, SrOfficial said:

We still do.

Sometimes "auto correct" will change something, but I'm sure it's not the case in most instances.  One should always check what one posts!

Auto-correct does that to me, a lot. It happens more than you might think. 

On 9/21/2018 at 10:48 PM, Brookside said:

It drives me mad when people use possessives wrongly, as in:

"He was a friend of my son's," or, "I got it from a cousin of my dad's."

Son's what?  Dad's what?

I’m sure that I’m guilty of this one. 

My mother went to grammar school, and was always on at me to pronounce “schedule” properly. She started with “shh” I say it starting with “sc” with a hard “c”. 

One of the few things that drives me batty, is on the walking dead, when they say, “I got bit”. It’s BITTEN. B I T T E N. “I was bitten.” 

  • Love 6
Link to comment
5 minutes ago, Anela said:

My mother went to grammar school, and was always on at me to pronounce “schedule” properly. She started with “shh” I say it starting with “sc” with a hard “c”. 

Technically both are correct.  However, the former is more prevalent in British pronunciation, whereas the latter is more American.  (Not sure about Australian.)

  • Love 7
Link to comment
On 8/24/2018 at 10:31 PM, shapeshifter said:

The use of the obective form after the comparison word "than" seems obviously wrong to me if I tack on an additional verb, as in: 

   My sister is older than I am. [correct]

   My sister is older than me am. [wrong]

But I am increasingly hearing an object used rather than a subject by reporters on NPR and now see it used by a New York Times writer who "has been a columnist for The Times since 2009. . . . and has served as a foreign correspondent and foreign editor," here near the end of his piece:

   "The problem is way deeper than him."

Shouldn't it be: "The problem is way deeper than he [is]"?

Or is it acceptable to use "him" for some grammatical reason unknown to me?

I also use the Oxford comma for clarity.

My problem there, would be with a journalist saying “way deeper” and I don’t know why. It just doesn’t sound right, coming from a professional. 

7 minutes ago, SVNBob said:

Technically both are correct.  However, the former is more prevalent in British pronunciation, whereas the latter is more American.  (Not sure about Australian.)

Thank you. :) Mum was English, and most of my schooling happened over there.  My dad is American, and we moved back here when I was a teenager.  

7 minutes ago, SVNBob said:
Edited by Anela
  • Love 1
Link to comment
2 hours ago, SVNBob said:

Technically both are correct.  However, the former is more prevalent in British pronunciation, whereas the latter is more American.  (Not sure about Australian.)

Sadly, Oz is more prone to Americanisation these days. I always use Britsh. Not because I'm a hardcore Anglophile or loyal to the queen or anything, but because I have a strongstubborn and curmudgeonly streak. If the Yank version is rising, I'm going to use the Pom version out of spite.

  • Love 3
Link to comment

From the Grauniad:  "I grew up in a stable, working-class home in Hull in the 1980s, but I always craved excitement.  That's probably why, aged 18, I moved to Tulsa, Oklahoma."

Nothing like growing up in a stable in Hull and then moving to Tulsa for the stimulation.

  • Love 4
Link to comment
21 minutes ago, Brookside said:

From the Grauniad:  "I grew up in a stable, working-class home in Hull in the 1980s, but I always craved excitement.  That's probably why, aged 18, I moved to Tulsa, Oklahoma."

Nothing like growing up in a stable in Hull and then moving to Tulsa for the stimulation.

That comma after "stable" does create some unintentional misdirection.

But I don't think the sentence is wrong, per se. It would be wrong if the article "a" was inserted before "working-class"--"I grew up in a stable, a working-class home in Hull..." (Unless the writer really were born in a stable.) As written, however, it's simply a pair of adjectives which don't need to be separated by a comma but which can just about permissibly be separated by a comma. (Much like the following: "I grew up in a large, ungainly house...")

The writer should have looked at the effect that comma created--even if technically not wrong--and then not done that.

Edited by Milburn Stone
  • Love 6
Link to comment
10 minutes ago, Milburn Stone said:
31 minutes ago, Brookside said:

From the Grauniad:  "I grew up in a stable, working-class home in Hull in the 1980s, but I always craved excitement.  That's probably why, aged 18, I moved to Tulsa, Oklahoma."

Nothing like growing up in a stable in Hull and then moving to Tulsa for the stimulation.

That comma after "stable" does create some unintentional misdirection.

But I don't think the sentence is wrong, per se

I agree that it's not wrong, but thanks, @Brookside, for sharing your interpretation; I needed a good chuckle.

  • Love 3
Link to comment
4 hours ago, JacquelineAppleton said:

One i hate is "might of". MIGHT OF?! And yet if you complain, you get called an "ELITIST".

That's awful when you see it in print. When you hear it spoken, it's not so bad (IMO) because it sounds practically identical to the correct contraction, might've. Only the subtlest of vowel sounds separate them--an "uh" in might of, an "a-as-in-have" in might've. But lots of people pronounce "uh" even when they know full well to write it as might've or might have.

  • Love 2
Link to comment

I'm bothered when people add an unnecessary verb to phrases that already have one, as in "The question is is whether or not to take the bus,"  "My problem is is I hate the IRS."  The other day I heard Michael Caine say something along the lines of "What happened was is that I decided to retire."  Made my skin crawl.

  • Love 3
Link to comment

When did "honestly" begin to be used superfluously? 

It doesn't bother me when I hear it, but seeing it typed is annoying.

 

ETA: Apparently I need to get over it, since the OED recognizes it:

Quote

 4. Used parenthetically or as a sentence adverb.

 a. Expressing asseveration or as part of a rhetorical question: to be honest, in all honesty.

1819 London Literary Gaz. 28 Aug. 557/2 Honestly, I am sorry to refuse you.

1873 T. Hardy Pair of Blue Eyes II. v. 79 But I want to, papa. Honestly, I am restless at having been so ignominiously overcome.

1898 G. B. Shaw Mrs. Warren's Professioniii. 204 Honestly, dear Praddy, do you like seeing them together?

1913 E. Ferber Roast Beef Mediumi. 14 ‘Honestly, kid,’ said the voice, ‘I could be crazy about you, if you'd let me.’

1944 J. Joyce Stephen Hero xvii. 56 Well, honestly, isn't he a dreadful-looking artist?

1989 in R. Graef Talking Blues vii. 240 But you get the minority..who are, quite honestly, a bit dim.

2010 R. Thomas On Third Day 434 I'm fine, honestly. I'm just tired.

—or maybe not, since it does seem to be only used conversationally.

Beginning sentences with "Now, . . . " is in the OED too.

Since all of my mother's emphasis on using correct, proper grammar did not in anyway buy me a higher economic station in life (the opposite has occurred), maybe I should try billionaire double speak.

Edited by shapeshifter
  • Love 2
Link to comment
14 minutes ago, Sandman87 said:

One of the local solar panel installers is running an ad where they announce that they're "giving away a free solar system." I guess that's fine, but the winner will probably need a spaceship to get there.

I was thinking the winner would need a really big backyard.

  • Love 7
Link to comment
1 hour ago, Sandman87 said:

One of the local solar panel installers is running an ad where they announce that they're "giving away a free solar system." I guess that's fine, but the winner will probably need a spaceship to get there.

Aren't gifts by definition free?  I've always hated that particular redundancy.  Simply say "They're offering a free" whatever, or "They're giving away a" whatever.  But DON'T say "giving away a free" whatever -- and NEVER call anything a "free gift"!

  • Love 7
Link to comment

Aaaargh!!! I'm watching old Inspector Lynley episodes on Britbox and have the closed captioning on. Twice so far-TWICE--the CC has "would of" instead of "would have." There are a lot of other errors which seem to stem from mishearing dialogue (Anna for Helene, for example) but come on! The captioner clearly heard the common contraction for "would have" and honestly thought it's supposed to be "would of"? WTF? How is this person allowed to do this job?

  • Love 9
Link to comment
On 10/19/2018 at 11:26 PM, shapeshifter said:

Heard by a 9-1-1 operator recently, "A woman is attempting to ride a horse through the Taco Bell drive-though, but the horse is not having it."

This made me laugh, but where is the grammatical error?  At worst it's a pun. "Not having it" -- colloquial for refusing, referring to the drive-through, and "not having it" -- Taco Bell, on the hoof or otherwise. 

  • Love 4
Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...