Jump to content

Type keyword(s) to search

Show Spoilers and Book Talk


Athena
  • Reply
  • Start Topic

Recommended Posts

(edited)

Starz YouTube vignette of the return of BJR. This is the Italy Outlander version of what Starz just tweeted. (I couldn't find a YouTube of the USA version yet.) It's in English with Italian subtitles. There are some shots of 206. I will say the look on Sam's face when he enters the room at the brothel (I'm assuming that's where it is) is everything I imagined in the book. (It's only one quick shot, so you have to pause it.) Damn.

Edited by Dust Bunny
  • Love 1
(edited)

So do we think there will be a huge time lapse in the next episode that includes the loss of Faith, Claire's recovery, the Fergus stuff, and her appeal to the king/reunited with Jamie?  Seems a lot for one episode but I guess I have always assumed the following episode "The Fox's Lair" to refer to Scotland/Old Fox.  

Edited by morgan

Okay, I checked the info on Fios and it does look like Fox's Lair is in Scotland so a lot to happen in this next episode to wrap up France.

Now a new question.  Wasn't sure to put this in speculation or in spoilers but erring on side of caution.  I rarely visit the compuserve forum that Diana posts on occasionally but wandered over there a bit ago.  I had totally forgotten about the jump the shark moment she elduded to earlier when talking about season 2.  She was on recently saying we still haven't seen it and we will know when it happens.  Any thoughts as to what that could be?  I was kind of hoping it was the nonsense Claire spouted in 206 about "its ok to lie to me sometimes."  But nope, apparently not it.  Makes me a wee bit nervous.  

It hasn't happened yet and she said they did throttle back a bit on it but says it's still coming. I'm very curious and my mind keeps wandering and wondering today.  Not sure which ep, but when she first referred to it she hadn't seen the final ep yet so not that one.  And I assume not the ep she wrote.  

http://forums.compuserve.com/discussions/Books_and_Writers_Community/_/_/ws-books/83283.1683

(edited)

Thanks Morgan. I'm going to ponder this. Maybe how they handle stuff with Claire and the King? (I hope it's not something with Laoghaire, ugh)

ETA: a friend suggested maybe it would involve BJR/Tobias since the show loves him so much. Ugh. Was there much of BJR in the book after the duel? I feel like there wasn't.

ETA: on wait, he was. The Alex stuff. Duh. Maybe something to do with the wedding to Mary, then?

Edited by AheadofStraight

I have been house cleaning most of the day so lots of time to ponder.  I do keep going back to BJR or Laoghaire because those are the two that will likely irritate me most.  A few people were speculating on compuserve that Claire makes Jamie promise to marry Laoghaire in case she has to go thru stones or something happens to her.  I just can't go there.  Nope.  Not gonna.  I did have a thought about maybe BJR and Jamie end up in the Bastille together at some point (assuming Jack heals from his wounds while Jamie is still there) but *shudder.) no torture, just talking stuff.  

A few other thoughts I have had is maybe something with lord John during the Prestonpans ep?  But I really only think that because Ira wrote that and wasn't it him and Ron who tried to pull the "BJR asks Jamie to run away with him" crap from last season that Diana shut down?

My current thought and one I could see happening is Claire befriending Loaghaire, taking her under her wing/teaching her how to take care of the wounded.  I could see some of the writers thinking that was a great use of her while fans would say oh hell no.  

(edited)

Ok just saw on compuserve that Diana posted it isn't about Loaghaire so that theory is dead.  And Maril said on Twitter that it isn't in episode 7 so I assume not about Louis.  Unless the Louis stuff bleeds over to episode 8, which I don't think it does.  Well, not worried about it but am still curious!  Maybe something totally in a different direction  like Dougal kills Colum?  Although honestly for it to be a jump the shark/however you interpret that (decline of show or just ludicrous event, which I think Diana meant the latter), I would think it would have to do with Jamie and/or Claire?  Or I suppose Frank or BJR.  

Edited by morgan

Diana confirmed she didn't mean the true meaning of jump the shark (and it's unfortunate she used that term because it caused the chaos):

 

Quote

Well, rather plainly the show isn't going into a decline, either in terms of quality or viewership, and yes, I did mean it in the broader sense of just doing something that stretches credulity or appropriateness.

  • Love 1

I am not brooding but definitely am curious.  There have been a few deviations from the books in the series, some that had an obvious and not good reaction by fans.  Wondering what makes this different?  She did say they dialed back at least, but def sounds like a direction she didn't agree with.  And my mind keeps going back to the incredibly awful idea about BJR asking Jamie to run away with him last season.  Is it as bad as that idea was?  Thank god she talked them out of that one!

  • Love 1
1 hour ago, toolazy said:

I feel a little better now because I spent yesterday brooding and fretting about this.  Thank god whatever it is doesn't involve Loaghaire.  Maybe it's whatever leads up to Dougal fighting with Jamie and the boys.  I think I tolerate changes the plots involving the Mackenzie boys more than plots involving her.

Well, technically, she said it doesn't involve *Jamie* and Laoghaire. It could still be Claire?

Actual quote: No, it's not a thing regarding Jamie and Laoghaire. I can tell you that much, at least.

That said, I'm still hoping she isn't involved at all.

Someone who saw episode 7 talked about it generally here:

http://www.threeifbyspace.net/2016/05/outlander-preview-ep-207-faith/#.Vz8XKuS6OMN

Also, here's a curious tidbit someone from another message board noticed. Look at the very end of the list of cast. Could that be a mistake?

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt4462712/fullcredits?ref_=tt_cl_sm#cast

  • Love 3
(edited)

I really wish I could be one of those midnight watchers the article mentions, but I have a work commitment today and tomorrow. The best I can do is hope the hotel has wifi so I can download it tomorrow morning and then watch it on the plane going home. Stupid work, especially for this episode. Mmphm.

As for the possible cast surprise, that intrigues me. I think there are a couple ways they can do that, maybe as a dream-foreshadow? The article makes me wonder if that's the first scene. I'd be fine with that addition. I think that would thrust the 40s-60s plot forward.

Edited by Dust Bunny

I'm just glad someone gave Fergus a sweater because it is colder in Scotland than in Paris.

As for Claire's look -- I'm happy to make the fan-wank that her Leoch wardrobe was returned to her when she got back to Lallybroch (she left most of it behind when she and Jenny went off in search of Jamie ye ken) and I'm glad to see those costumes again because they are wonderful.  But I'm not crazy about Claire wrapping a tartan around herself in lieu of the lovely hooded, fur-lined riding coat she had in season 1.  I understand the symbolism -- Claire is literally wrapping herself in Scottishness -- but it hides her loverly swan-like neck and so the photos do not flatter her.

9 hours ago, Grashka said:

Beautiful stills from 2.08

http://www.farfarawaysite.com/section/outlander/gallery2/gallery8/gallery.htm

Can I just say that I love seeing Claire again in her plain, woolen Scottish clothes?

And it looks like there might be Jamie&Fergus moment. I would love that.

I'm sure there were other factors, but what great timing for Tom and Lorenzo to drop their fashion recaps, just as there's a return to loads of plain woolen costumes!

I'm really interested in the new scenes in the opening theme song sequence, especially the ones from "modern" times. Who is that driving a car up to the ruins of Lallybroch? It looks like Claire to me (female hands and a hint of curls), but wasn't it Roger who went there in the books? Also, shouldn't it have a roof if Roger and Bree are going to live there later? I guess that's probably way too far ahead in the story to think about. 

I'm also really excited about the part that you can see if you pause it when Laura Donnelly and Steven Cree's names are on screen. It looks like a 60sish car with a man and a woman carrying a picnic or something...I'm guessing Roger and Bree. That makes me wonder if maybe the last episode of the season is going to have more Roger and Bree than I thought it would. I wonder if we'll get a true mirror of episode 201 and get a full 40 minutes or so with Claire and them in the 60s and her convincing Roger to look for the men. I would really like it if they end the season the same way the book ends, because those last few lines always give me shivers.

  • Love 3

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...