All Episodes Talk: All Rise

[WhoaWhoKnew]

1 minute ago, AZChristian said:

This new season is really not that great.  I've been skipping a lot of shows.  JJ seems to make up her mind before the litigants even appear, and no evidence they present changes JJ's mind.  It's been really noticeable this season.

I feel like she is dismissing cases more often, too.

[AngelaHunter]

1 hour ago, SandyToes said:

I missed most of this week's eps.  But in truth, I'm not sure I missed much.  :-(

I filled my wineglass and sat down to watch, but I don't have the case with Leo, his watch and IPhone and Brian's foster dad. Disappointed, I am. Greatly.

I better have another drink.

In other news, I nearly got one wall tiled. I wonder who I can sue if I screw it up - maybe Rona, since no one there told me that super cheap tiles may not all be uniform? I'm sure someone else will be to blame for the mess I made AND for my emotional distress.

[CrazyInAlabama]

Last week, most of the shows on my local channel said "New" on the cable guide, but at least a couple of those were the right description, but were reruns I remembered.    

[badhaggis]

I have a girl crush on Leo's mom. She seemed like a wonderful mother, person and advocate for her son. 

[VartanFan]

On 8/20/2018 at 8:52 PM, CrazyInAlabama said:

The other one with the young man who cheated the mentally challenged man was despicable.     He reminded me a lot of Eddie Haskell from Leave it to Beaver, the original shady character who always acted like an angel.      I wonder how may other people the defendant has cheated over the years. 

 

Yes, the D was a piece of shit but if you are a single mother and your kid has the mental capacity of a 10-year old, WHY are you buying him iphones and iwatches at all of those prices?  It boggles the mind.  That and I"m wondering why she couldn't make an insurance claim for stolen watch??

[CrazyInAlabama]

My guess is that either she bought the watch under the table, or she didn't have insurance to claim against, or her son gets cheated or robbed all of the time because he doesn't realize he's being robbed.    There was definitely something going on with that case. 

"Eddie's" foster father shouldn't be surprised when the psychopath does something hideous, because he's certainly being fooled by him.     He should have shown Eddie the door when he heard about this case, because he's only going to get worse, and doesn't care who he hurts.  

[WhoaWhoKnew]

24 minutes ago, VartanFan said:

Yes, the D was a piece of shit but if you are a single mother and your kid has the mental capacity of a 10-year old, WHY are you buying him iphones and iwatches at all of those prices?  It boggles the mind.  That and I"m wondering why she couldn't make an insurance claim for stolen watch??

Leo "gave" Brian the watch,  so insurance might not pay out.

Single mom doesn't always mean hurting for money. I don't blame her for wanting to give Leo "things" to allow him to feel as normal as possible given his situation.

[asaphere]

On 5/6/2017 at 5:21 AM, Giant Misfit said:

Not just any car, a Mercedes SUV. I know this because it was mentioned by mutant Matthew Rowe at least six times. And for someone as "hardcore" as he wanted to present himself to be, he sure seemed to caught up in the trappings of the bourgeoisie.  

And what source material, exactly, did he present to his tattoo artist (misnomer there) for those eyebrows? A photo of one of the queens from Drag Race? 

And who hired him? The only job he'd be presentable for would be unpaid troll assistant under the bridge. 

Finally, unsurprised when he mentioned he had been in prison. Oh, you don't say, sir. 

Wait! One more! When they showed him in profile with that laughable tattooed hairline, it looked like some sort of space helmet from a Buck Rogers movie. 

ONE MORE! It's bad enough that lady willingly banged him with him looking like an LSD hallucination in front of her face -- but he had "Erica" tattooed on top of his head. How would she be OK with that? How was she OK with any of that? 

Can anyone link me to this episode or video clips from it? Please

[ItsHelloPattiagain]

Was anybody watching and was as creeped out as I was by the humanoid looking plaintiff with the identical twin-looking (except for hair color) sister who was suing the massively-cleavaged Jessica Rabbitish defendant over the french bulldog? (who just ironically turned into a service dog because the plaintiff's sister pinched her upper arm during the ensuing kerfuffle). I imagine the defendant Amazon-primed The Frenchie a cute little vest with matching beret embroidered with "Best Service Dog Evah". 

I was trying to read the arrest document where the guy was suing his meth headed sister over his car being impounded. I did read the words "glass pipe" toward the bottom of the page. 

[CrazyInAlabama]

I couldn't believe that the loan for bail case took that long, and that defendant, and plaintiff claimed they were just friends.    That was a big nothing of a case, but it still amazes me that this man has had a suspended license for so many years, and only got arrested a few times.    

The storage case was stupid too.    Why would you leave your dear, departed mother's ashes behind?     Another plaintiff who thought they were going to get millions for their trashy, left behind garbage.   

The dog case with the twins (I'm assuming twins) that looked alike, dressed alike, and one shacked up with the pneumatic boobed blond was all kinds of creepy.    Anyone else thing it was just a two person relationship?     My guess is that plaintiff pinched her own arm, and then called the police and claimed the sister did it.  And someone should explain to the defendant that therapy dog doesn't equal service dog, and you don't get money for something you never paid for.    It wasn't her dog.    And claiming they stole 'your' cat?    That was stupid too.     I think her bust measurement was at least double her I.Q.   She should have received nothing, because I'm betting that there was a lot of hitting from everyone involved in the case.  

Edited August 27, 2018 by CrazyInAlabama

[iwasish]

1 hour ago, ItsHelloPattiagain said:

Was anybody watching and was as creeped out as I was by the humanoid looking plaintiff with the identical twin-looking (except for hair color) sister who was suing the massively-cleavaged Jessica Rabbitish defendant over the french bulldog? (who just ironically turned into a service dog because the plaintiff's sister pinched her upper arm during the ensuing kerfuffle). I imagine the defendant Amazon-primed The Frenchie a cute little vest with matching beret embroidered with "Best Service Dog Evah". 

I was trying to read the arrest document where the guy was suing his meth headed sister over his car being impounded. I did read the words "glass pipe" toward the bottom of the page. 

I was on the phone and missed the introduction...... I thought the second plaintiff was her girlfriend!! I wondered why they looked so much alike!!

[AngelaHunter]

Oh, hell, I just started and had to stop at the air-headed nitwit, Ms. Martinez, who appeared here with her breasts prominently displayed and is suing her ex-paramour, "AJ" Diaz who is a 40 year old man who can't drive without racking up so many tickets and not paying them that his license was suspended and then got arrested for - duh - driving with a suspended license. He's not sure how many times he's been arrested, but it's never been his fault. All the cops are racist and it has nothing to do with his inability to drive without breaking the law, etc.

Ms.Martinez, who says she's now married, has a few screws loose in whatever shrivelled walnut she calls a brain and thought it was a good idea to give "AJ" 2500$ and he says it's to repair her credit and that he gave her stuff too (none of which he can recall) and OMG. Fuck off, both of you. UGH.

[CrazyInAlabama]

It finally hit me who the defendant looked like, she looked a lot like one of the realtors on Flipping Vegas, I'm sure it wasn't the same woman, but she sure looked like her.   I have the distinct suspicion that it was at least a three-some in that house, if not more people we didn't see in court staying there from time to time.  

I think the defendant and the plaintiff on the meth head sister impound case looked absolutely stoned.    The plaintiff could barely keep his eyes open.  

[iwasish]

1 hour ago, ItsHelloPattiagain said:

Was anybody watching and was as creeped out as I was by the humanoid looking plaintiff with the identical twin-looking (except for hair color) sister who was suing the massively-cleavaged Jessica Rabbitish defendant over the french bulldog? (who just ironically turned into a service dog because the plaintiff's sister pinched her upper arm during the ensuing kerfuffle). I imagine the defendant Amazon-primed The Frenchie a cute little vest with matching beret embroidered with "Best Service Dog Evah". 

I was trying to read the arrest document where the guy was suing his meth headed sister over his car being impounded. I did read the words "glass pipe" toward the bottom of the page. 

I was on the phone and missed the introduction...... I thought the second plaintiff was her girlfriend!! I wondered why they looked so much alike!!

[Hagosaurus]

I have a feeling that they all met at a porn shoot. I guarantee that one of our forum super-sleuths can find that blonde, big breasted defendant in at least one naughty video. They had a distinctly porny aura about them.

[Brattinella]

I found that she is a body builder.

[AngelaHunter]

13 hours ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

I think the defendant and the plaintiff on the meth head sister impound case looked absolutely stoned.   

Crackhead def looked like she had a metal rod running up the back of her clothes and maybe clipped to her neck (like a tomato plant support) in order to hold her head up. "Buzzed" she was, for sure. Don't know about the douche bag-haired plaintiff, but he's the guy who lets a drug addict with a suspended license and warrants use his car, so tough for him.

10 hours ago, Hagosaurus said:

I have a feeling that they all met at a porn shoot.

I didn't watch this because I saw "dog" in the blurb, but maybe I need to. You all make it so tempting.

[Sarcastico]

Quote

the massively-cleavaged Jessica Rabbitish defendant

I was surprised to hear her use the term, "Stockholm syndrome" in the hallterview.

[CrazyInAlabama]

This dog case was safe to watch.     They only showed a picture of the dog, and the dog wasn't hurt at all, just own by lunatics.

[Mondrianyone]

Just now, Sarcastico said:

I was surprised to hear her use the term, "Stockholm syndrome" in the hallterview.

She wasn't dumb, she was just drawn that way.

Seriously, that twin-lesbians-and-the-bombshell-bodybuilder case was like a scene out of a David Lynch movie.

[Cobalt Stargazer]

7 hours ago, AngelaHunter said:

Crackhead def looked like she had a metal rod running up the back of her clothes and maybe clipped to her neck (like a tomato plant support) in order to hold her head up. "Buzzed" she was, for sure. Don't know about the douche bag-haired plaintiff, but he's the guy who lets a drug addict with a suspended license and warrants use his car, so tough for him.

I enjoyed JJ telling the defendant that there was no way the cop could have known that she had a suspended license and unpaid tickets since she was driving a borrowed car. I don't think she ever said why he pulled her over, though. Too stoned to remember, I guess.

[patty1h]

I didn't like the wife in the case of the exes suing about lawyer fees for their druggie daughter.  I don't think it would be right for her dad to front the money, but the woman apparently has been pampered and kept by daddy for too long that the idea of paying her own bills seems to be an alien concept.  Sure, she doesn't have a job but what irks me is that she seemed to be against JJ's opinion that she needs to repay her ex-husband. 

She kept trying to bring up some old dirt or something to bolster the idea that some past incident should exonerate her in needing to cough up some money and her making excuses for her daughter's criminal behavior indicates that responsibility is not a big part of her character.

[Florinaldo]

56 minutes ago, patty1h said:

I didn't like the wife in the case of the exes suing about lawyer fees for their druggie daughter.  I don't think it would be right for her dad to front the money, but the woman apparently has been pampered and kept by daddy for too long that the idea of paying her own bills seems to be an alien concept.  Sure, she doesn't have a job but what irks me is that she seemed to be against JJ's opinion that she needs to repay her ex-husband. 

She kept trying to bring up some old dirt or something to bolster the idea that some past incident should exonerate her in needing to cough up some money and her making excuses for her daughter's criminal behavior indicates that responsibility is not a big part of her character.

And it looks like she is raising her daughter to be another deadbeat parasite dependent on the generosity of the elder members of the family; since she does not have any real source of income (does anyone really believe she is seriously looking for a job?), it is the grandparents who will once again be called upon to pay up, along with the father.

[CrazyInAlabama]

So this parents of this useless, stupid grown woman, mother of two have been paying her bills for 11 years!    I disagree with the judge this time, the grandfather has been paying the bills, except for some child support, for 11 years, and paid for the bail, and probably paid for the previous attorney, so it was reasonable of the plaintiff (Mr. Clean) to think the father would pony up to bail the 20 year old dealer out of jail.  And who believes it was the boyfriend's drugs, and not hers?     I'm sure grandpa bailed her out before, and he'll do it again, and he probably paid for the first lawyers too.   

I'm guessing when the granddaughter gets out in September, that she'll be back in time for Thanksgiving at the cellblock, and next time she won't be getting six months, but many times that for a sentence.    

My question is who is that woman behind the defendants right shoulder?   She has the worst RBF I've seen in years.   

 

Why do people wait years to come to court?   The credit card case amounts to exactly $5,000?   How amazing that's the court limit.   

The Caretaker's mother (the defendant's witness, who I guess is the mother) certainly looks pissed to be there, plus the mother was power of attorney for the man's kid?    Plaintiff is certainly a chick magnet.   

And his big mouthed witness isn't the girlfriend, but she's is actually the knocked up wife, and dresses in clothes from Tramps R Us!  I wonder where Mr. Adorable, and his wife met?   And was a stripper pole involved?   I loved when she wouldn't shut up, and Byrd bounced her fanny out.     I feel sorry for the son, because his stepmom looks like an idiot, his father definitely is one, and the former caretaker is just as dumb.    

Who buys their daughter's boyfriend a car?   And who thinks the former meth head is a catch with six kids?    How nice, he only smokes pot now.  For some reason Judge Judy wasn't thrilled by the fact he's only smoking dope now.      It's pretty bad when you mom has to buy cars for your loser boyfriend to keep them around.   Big surprise, he "doesn't feel he owes the mother any money".     Too bad the judge can't take the money, and donate to something worthy, instead of give it to these fools to buy cars, or lend money to their kid's loser boyfriends.  I hope the ex-boyfriend's car engine melts down, with a car load of pot, and right in front of the police station.   

Some people certainly are desperate today, between the credit card idiot, and the former meth head.  

[Brattinella]

4 minutes ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

My question is who is that woman behind the defendants right shoulder?   She has the worst RBF I've seen in years.   

Are you referring to the girl with THE LIPS?

[CrazyInAlabama]

Yes, if it's the one with the world's biggest frown.     

I loved how the audience was giggling when Byrd bounced the trampy wife out during the credit card/caretaker case.  

[AuntiePam]

2 hours ago, Cobalt Stargazer said:

I enjoyed JJ telling the defendant that there was no way the cop could have known that she had a suspended license and unpaid tickets since she was driving a borrowed car. I don't think she ever said why he pulled her over, though. Too stoned to remember, I guess.

Except that this is what happened.  I paused the picture so I could read the police report, and it said that she was stopped because he recognized her as having a suspended license.  So defendant was telling the truth about that.  It can happen - especially in small towns.

Defendant was so buzzed, she wasn't even able to do an "I told you so!" 

[CrazyInAlabama]

Yes, on Live PD the officers often know the local offenders by sight.   Maybe stoner sister should move to a bigger town, so the police don't know her on sight.  

[SandyToes]

2 hours ago, patty1h said:

I didn't like the wife in the case of the exes suing about lawyer fees for their druggie daughter.  I don't think it would be right for her dad to front the money, but the woman apparently has been pampered and kept by daddy for too long that the idea of paying her own bills seems to be an alien concept.  Sure, she doesn't have a job but what irks me is that she seemed to be against JJ's opinion that she needs to repay her ex-husband. 

This was awful.  "I should get a job!"  You think?  After 11 years, why start now?  Being a "Stay at home mom" doesn't seem to be doing the kids any favors. I think she has her own "issues" and that's why her daddy keeps putting up with it. As a parent, I get it. I really do. But at some point, you gotta think that your kids need to make it on their own. Grandaddy isn't always going to be able to bail sweetie pie out of jail.  (Unless maybe there's a special trust fund he's set up just for that purpose?)

I get that the dad thought Grandaddy has certainly been paying mom's share of children's expenses, why not this one?  I could tell JJ was going to go down the "how did you expect her to pay you back?" road early on. Grrr.... 

Missed the earlier cases on that ep.  Dang. Also missed the well-cleavaged "Jessica Rabbitish" from the other day. But the recaps/recounts have been hilarious!

Edited August 29, 2018 by SandyToes
just how many sets of quote marks are legal in one post? Criminy!

[Brattinella]

2 minutes ago, SandyToes said:

I get that the dad thought Grandaddy has certainly been paying mom's share of children's expenses, why not this one?  I could tell JJ was going to go down the "how did you expect her to pay you back?" road early on. Grrr.... 

Um, Judge Judy, ma'am, maybe because she SIGNED THE CONTRACT??  Grrr...

[CrazyInAlabama]

Don't worry, soon the second episode will be a recent rerun, instead of the current two new ones (at least according to my rotten cable guide) so you'll see Jessica R and her pyramids, and Meg the mommy of the year, sucking the life out of her father in reruns.   Taping JJ is why I learned to run my DVR, so I don't miss any of the episodes during thunderstorm season.  

I hope the father in the lawyer/bail case has learned his lesson, and will no longer waste his money on his ex, and the two daughters.   At 19 and 20, they're old enough to beg grandpa for money, and I'm sure they do.  

Edited August 29, 2018 by CrazyInAlabama

[AngelaHunter]

2 hours ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

Who buys their daughter's boyfriend a car? 

Shockingly, we've seen that plenty of times - fathers and mothers buying cars for some asshole, loser, deadbeat temporary boyfriend of Dear Daughter. Is this the new dowry? I had boyfriends back in the dinosaur days. Not once did I ask my mother to buy them cars, or even to co-sign for them because, well, they were grown men and bought their own cars. What a concept.

 

4 hours ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

This dog case was safe to watch.     They only showed a picture of the dog, and the dog wasn't hurt at all, just own by lunatics.

Thank you. I did try to watch this, but I couldn't. I was stunned to find out plaintiff was female, and the def? The enormous collagen duck lips, so billowy she could barely speak? The umpteen pounds of silicone in the bolt-ons, proudly displayed in the skin tight top? Both of them were so... I don't know, but I just could not continue. JC.

[zillabreeze]

2 hours ago, Brattinella said:

Are you referring to the girl with THE LIPS?

Lawd!  Actually, she's over the Plaintiffs Left shoulder.  GIANT bottom lip.  It looks like an old school clown "sad face"  circa 1960's paint by number set, purchased at the dime store.   If that's nature, well, bless her heart.  If that's filler, then a lawsuit is warranted.

As an unfortunate owner of RBF,  I'm usually more sympathetic, but heavens, that's just wrong.

Sorry, youngsters-  "dime store" was the old school Dollar Store.  Only shit was better quality and your mom would turn you loose in the toy area.  But, could still whoop your behind if you acted up.  The manager in the elevated corner office would NOT call CPS during that whooping, that you probably richly deserved.

Edited August 29, 2018 by zillabreeze

[VartanFan]

Yowza - Jessica Rabbit defendent has gone under the knife too many times.  Every time they showed her, I was mystified.  I also thought she shouldn’t have gotten a penny.  You could tell she was savvy to protocols because she even said...i told her the police wouldn’t do anything because it’s a civil matter.  I’d bet she put marks on herself after they called.  

 

Oh, bail mommy - - there’s no fucking shame in taking a job in retail or restaurant, etc.  She absolutely should hightail it to any local establishment and work 20 hours a week to pay back what she promised.  And HER parents are pathetic for supporting her and her kid(s) for over a decade.  She seems to have learned her enabling from the best.  

Edited August 29, 2018 by VartanFan

[zillabreeze]

Bail Mommy.  I am completely on board that dad dude deserved the win.  She prob said "let little princess out of the slammer and Daddy will cover.

Grandpa Dude has bailed the whole bunch out so many times, that the repay WAS "a  reasonable expectation of repayment".

2 minutes ago, zillabreeze said:

 

Edited August 29, 2018 by zillabreeze

[Brattinella]

49 minutes ago, zillabreeze said:

It looks like an old school clown "sad face"  circa 1960's paint by number set, purchased at the dime store.

This is exactly what I thought.  VERY bad implants/makeup.

[nora1992]

Regarding the two exes fighting over lawyer-money: if plaintiff got away with stiffing the defendant on child support, then I see her point in the excuse.  The fact that he was so blasé about his daughter’s arrest and would have preferred a public defender makes me wonder what else he skimps on.  I’m glad he’s not my father.

[CrazyInAlabama]

I maybe mistaken, but I think he repaid the back child support years ago.   I think he said he was unemployed for a while or something.  

The parents of many of the kids that get caught with drugs are so stupid.    No it's not the boyfriend's or other person's weed when it's dealer weight, and you're all sitting next to it with a pile of money.    And no, no one sells a car with a big brick of weed under the back seat (someone I know said that her daughter's bust for a giant brick of weed under the back seat of the used car that she'd had for months, and it was fresh stuff).   Then the excuse is it was her boyfriend[s stuff.   I bet boyfriend got busted, and ratted her out, because they don't just do traffic stops for no reason in that area, and they were all involved.  

Edited August 29, 2018 by CrazyInAlabama

[SRTouch]

4 hours ago, nora1992 said:

Regarding the two exes fighting over lawyer-money: if plaintiff got away with stiffing the defendant on child support, then I see her point in the excuse.  The fact that he was so blasé about his daughter’s arrest and would have preferred a public defender makes me wonder what else he skimps on.  I’m glad he’s not my father.

I had a different take on the lovely couple. I agree that at first they seemed to have a reasonable parenting plan with their shared custody. But the more JJ dug into the particulars the more I questioned whether they actually had a good plan. Apparently, when they divorced mommy had a decent job, and in fact she earned a little bit more than daddy and paid him some minimal support when the kids lived with him. Ah, but then she quit her job, became a stay at home mommy (of high schoolers), and moved into a house owned by her parents to live rent free. Soooo, she goes back to court and gets original support agreement - the one where she pays him a bit more because she had the better job - tossed out. I bet when the judge modified the agreement the support agreement her unemployment was expected to be temporary, but nooooo.... mommy found her niche, she's now a stay at home mommy being supported by her parents - with at least one of the daughters currently doing time for drug related crimes. Apparently, once the girls hit high school the 50/50 custody ends and daddy pays more in support while mommy lives rent free supported by HER daddy while she "LOOKS" for a job.... after awhile, P realises she has no intention of getting a job, and resorts to self help and stops paying support. Not the best idea, as mommy gets her daddy to pay a lawyer and drag P into court where he gets painted as a deadbeat daddy - but ends up catching up on the back support (so he doesn't get out of paying support, he pays late). Mommy isn't looking to good... but then Daddy has his own faults - one of which seems to be letting the little head do his thinking... who else was wondering how old his new mouthy and pregnant wife is? His new kid could have nieces and nephew's the same age.

Edited August 29, 2018 by SRTouch

[Brattinella]

Dad should have gotten a public defender.  They spent ten thousand dollars on an attorney, and she STILL got prison time for her first offense.  She did something VERY bad to get prison.  Plus BAIL?  Just to keep her out for Christmas?  Sorry, Mom is a hell of an enabler.  If she hadn't bailed her, she wouldn't have popped dirty.

[SRTouch]

10 minutes ago, Brattinella said:

Dad should have gotten a public defender.  They spent ten thousand dollars on an attorney, and she STILL got prison time for her first offense.  She did something VERY bad to get prison.  Plus BAIL?  Just to keep her out for Christmas?  Sorry, Mom is a hell of an enabler.  If she hadn't bailed her, she wouldn't have popped dirty.

Not to forget HER enabling daddy - geez, she has two adult daughter's but here gramps is popping up with "excuse me, your honor, just read these emails." I don't think too highly of the D, but I wouldn't be at all surprised to learn gramps is at the root of this mess - including putting up the bail against one lawyer's advice and P's knowledge/consent.

[CrazyInAlabama]

I think the reason the drug dealer got such a long sentence originally was it probably wasn't her first go round, and I'm betting there's a lot more we didn't hear.   I'm sure her dirty urine test was blamed on her boyfriend too.    Mommy and grandpa need to get a clue, but they never will, and grandpa will never stop enabling all three of them.     Getting the second lawyer for the violation and sentencing was a waste of money, just like spending anything on the ex-wife or daughter is for the ex-husband.   The exhusband should write off the problems of ex wife, and the druggie daughter, and I hope the other daughter is doing better than that, and learning to be a responsible adult.  

The knock up trampy dressing wife was the caretaker credit card case, not the druggie daughter lawyer costs case.    The people on both sides of the aisle looked so much alike, I had to go look at the cases again to be sure.  

My estranged parents have purchased two houses for one brother (said they helped a little for the first one, he had zero savings or credit, and so did his girlfriend), helped with another house for the other loser (drugs, alcohol, stealing, but mom believe none of it, and she ruled the roost), and financed a hair salon, and a business for brother number one.     My mother will stop enabling the first brother never, because he dances to her tune.    Brother number two must have pissed mommy off, because he got cut out when mom gifted half of her house to the other brother.    So enabling, and lying are family traditions.    

Edited August 29, 2018 by CrazyInAlabama

[KittyMom4]

13 hours ago, SandyToes said:

This was awful.  "I should get a job!"  You think?  After 11 years, why start now?  Being a "Stay at home mom" doesn't seem to be doing the kids any favors. I think she has her own "issues" and that's why her daddy keeps putting up with it. As a parent, I get it. I really do. But at some point, you gotta think that your kids need to make it on their own. Grandaddy isn't always going to be able to bail sweetie pie out of jail.  (Unless maybe there's a special trust fund he's set up just for that purpose?)

 

10 minutes ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

I think the reason the drug dealer got such a long sentence originally was it probably wasn't her first go round, and I'm betting there's a lot more we didn't hear.   I'm sure her dirty urine test was blamed on her boyfriend too.    Mommy and grandpa need to get a clue, but they never will, and grandpa will never stop enabling all three of them.     Getting the second lawyer for the violation and sentencing was a waste of money, just like spending anything on the ex-wife or daughter is for the ex-husband.   The exhusband should write off the problems of ex wife, and the druggie daughter, and I hope the other daughter is doing better than that, and learning to be a responsible adult.  

Having lived through my parents enabling my younger brother for 50 years, through numerous financial crisis of his own making, 3 DUI's, 2 repo'd veehickles and one child (who he has done very little for), they have thrown good money after bad with him. Each time I hear "This time he's learned his lesson!" Ah no, no he hasn't, nor will he ever because they will continue to finance his poor life choices until they die. People like that never do learn anything other than how to take advantage of those that love them.

[zillabreeze]

Mayb

1 hour ago, GoodieGirl said:

 

Having lived through my parents enabling my younger brother for 50 years, through numerous financial crisis of his own making, 3 DUI's, 2 repo'd veehickles and one child (who he has done very little for), they have thrown good money after bad with him. Each time I hear "This time he's learned his lesson!" Ah no, no he hasn't, nor will he ever because they will continue to finance his poor life choices until they die. People like that never do learn anything other than how to take advantage of those that love them.

PREACH.  Just lost a sister last year to cirrhosis.  For ten years, it was "but she didn't drink that much at dinner".  Um. No.  Addicts don't use in front of people.  Addicts lie.  Bullshit is their second language.

[Schnickelfritz]

23 minutes ago, zillabreeze said:

Bullshit is their second FIRST language.

Fixed it for you.

[CrazyInAlabama]

I can't see mother of the year ever keeping a job, if she ever tries to get one.   Of course, being out of the work force for that many years is not a great item on a resume.    Very few employers keep people around that have druggie relatives calling collect from jail, running out to bail bond, and attorney offices, and going to court all of the time for druggie daughter's trials.     

[Mondrianyone]

Also, going on national TV before an audience of 10 million and showing yourself to be a slacker and a giant adult baby with no work ethic and no sense of personal responsibility won't increase your chances of employment either.  Especially if McD's drive-thru clerk and Walmart greeter are beneath you, which obviously she thinks they are.

These are the JJ litigants who infuriate me the most (as I'm sure I've said many times before).  The entitled, overprivileged monsters who were born with every opportunity and still think they deserve more and more.  I don't admire the sad sacks with the ugly tats and the missing teeth, but they don't fill me with the kind of rage that these types do.

[patty1h]

Word of the day is gaven.  Used in a sentence:  "I had gaven her the Iphone back".

[ButYourHonor]

Was JUST coming here to,post about that.  I think the whole sentence was something like, “I was gonna git the money back in according with the situation that I had gaven her the money.”

 

lordy...

[CrazyInAlabama]

Love the caretaker case.   So the drunken/stoned felon (in halterview plaintiff said defendant was a 20 times felon, I suspect drug sales) was a registered nurse, is now doing home health care, not working for an agency.    I love that the TV and cabinet, and everything got shot, but no one called the police.   Another case where people entrust their elderly or helpless relatives to some drunken stoned ex-felon, who apparently went to happy hour with her witness, who was also drunk and stoned out of her gourd.   This was the only person the plaintiff could find to stay with his mother?      

Poor grandma, loans some trampy ex of her grandson $2,000, $1,000 for bail for grandson, and $1,000 for dresses for tramp and grandchild (prices at Butt Ugly Dresses R Us sure have gone up to spend that much), and thinks she'll get that money back?     And a title loan to get the money!   I bet a lot of the second $1,000 was actually interest and charges from the title loan.    Age does not bring wisdom to some people does it?    And both grandchildren by this loser grandson are four months apart, and apparently he's not the only loser grandchild she has.    Just think, if I take a road trip to Florence (I live in Alabama), then I could see all of them fighting over the loser grandson if I get lucky.   

Phone payback-I guess the two defendants, and plaintiff all went to the same hairdresser?      And the two sisters certainly didn't look like sisters, but mother and daughter.     I love how two of the three have kids already.   Love the parting halterview shot by the defendant that the plaintiff's sister doesn't know who the father of her child is, and wondering if defendant does either, or maybe they're all from the grandson in the grandma loan case?   Bigger defendant sister shouldn't wear those ugly patterned pants, they're not helping the back view at all. 

Parking lot accident-What idiot that watches this show doesn't do a police report?      And of course defendant didn't want to do a police report, or talk to her insurance company, because she does this all of the time I'm guessing.    I bet if plaintiff wouldn't have been there, she would have kept on driving, and never said anything.   My guess is that there are a lot of people that can thank her for all kinds of car damage at school, and she's in the dictionary under "Hit and Run" (bimbo section).       If the defendant had hit her car, then he probably would have nailed his bumper or her bumper, not above the wheel well on her car.    I hate people who back into parking spaces, and can't back up without using the braille method.

Word of warning, apparently tomorrow's episode is a dog fight caused by feeding two dogs together.       

Edited August 29, 2018 by CrazyInAlabama