Kim Kardashian Thomas Humphries West

[nexxie]

So what happened at the Jack in the Box - did someone mention that Kimye named their poor kid Psalm and the laughter broke windows?

[iwasish]

And what is she doing at Jack in The Box? Getting a cup of hot water for her Flat Tummy Tea? Maybe they charged her for it and she’s speaking up for all those who only want free hot water but are being forced to make a purchase?  Or is she so busy with her 4 kids, husband, cosmetic/perfume empire, endless selfie taking and instagramming, plus law studies,  that she has no time to cook and is forced to feed the family fast food?

[howmanywords]

I dont know about Kim but Kanye is really into fast food so she could have been with him or getting him food. 

It obviously pays to be rude and demanding because she tweeted JIB yesterday thanking them for taking care of the situation. It could have been a serious matter so I'm not going to make jokes about the thing..as I said my big problem was Kim's demanding tone.

[heatherchandler]

Kim you are a fucking idiot -

https://www.womenshealthmag.com/life/a27571764/kim-kardashian-psalm-baby-crib-sids-photo/

[RHJunkie]

I'm not into shaming mothers for shit that happens to the best of them bu THIS....this defies basic education of infant care. I'm not even a mother and I know that is dangerous to the child - how do parents of THREE other children not know this yet? God has really been watching over these kids...and nannies I'm sure.

[Picture It. Sicily]

The nannies must have had the day off.

[iwasish]

2 hours ago, RHJunkie said:

I'm not into shaming mothers for shit that happens to the best of them bu THIS....this defies basic education of infant care. I'm not even a mother and I know that is dangerous to the child - how do parents of THREE other children not know this yet? God has really been watching over these kids...and nannies I'm sure.

But, but, but those are expensive designer bumpers and blankets, probably gifted by all their designer friends. All neatly cataloged and photographed by Kim.

Fashion trumps common sense.

[RHJunkie]

47 minutes ago, iwasish said:

But, but, but those are expensive designer bumpers and blankets, probably gifted by all their designer friends. All neatly cataloged and photographed by Kim.

Fashion trumps common sense.

The hilarity in that is if it's true, from that picture, all of those things look like anything you can pick-up at a Walmart or Target or Costco, lol. Surely designer tags can't be worth posting a picture that is evidence of such a stupid parental blunder. Reminded me immediately or Britney Spears car seat controversies and thinking there obviously must be something wrong with her to think that her decisions were even remotely close to being reasonable and safe for her child. 

[iwasish]

1 hour ago, RHJunkie said:

The hilarity in that is if it's true, from that picture, all of those things look like anything you can pick-up at a Walmart or Target or Costco, lol. Surely designer tags can't be worth posting a picture that is evidence of such a stupid parental blunder. Reminded me immediately or Britney Spears car seat controversies and thinking there obviously must be something wrong with her to think that her decisions were even remotely close to being reasonable and safe for her child. 

The mattress thing inside the crib looks my dog’s orthopedic bed.  

Kris is a Costco fan, but Kim and Kanye would never put their kid in less than top dollar stuff.

Edited May 24, 2019 by iwasish

[Cocoa Puff]

20 hours ago, heatherchandler said:

Kim you are a fucking idiot -

https://www.womenshealthmag.com/life/a27571764/kim-kardashian-psalm-baby-crib-sids-photo/

The thing that baby pslam 🙄 that name, is in is called a dockatot.

https://dockatot.com

But yeah the bumbers and all that other stuff gotta go. But this was strictly for the photos, I hope. Surly they've got competent Nanny's who are educated about keeping babies safe.

[Aw my lahgs]

2 hours ago, carolinagirl81 said:

The thing that baby pslam 🙄 that name, is in is called a dockatot.

https://dockatot.com

But yeah the bumbers and all that other stuff gotta go. But this was strictly for the photos, I hope. Surly they've got competent Nanny's who are educated about keeping babies safe.

Dockatots aren’t any different than bumpers. In my opinion, they’re even worse!

[BrindaWalsh]

She wrapped him in  swaddling cloth and laid him in a manger.

[merylinkid]

The kid was only in that thing long enough for the picture to be taken.   Then the nanny stepped in and put the kid in the real crib.   

[Cocoa Puff]

1 hour ago, merylinkid said:

The kid was only in that thing long enough for the picture to be taken.   Then the nanny stepped in and put the kid in the real crib.   

Exactly

[GaT]

6 hours ago, merylinkid said:

The kid was only in that thing long enough for the picture to be taken money the company paid Kim to post the photo was deposited.  Then the nanny stepped in and put the kid in the real crib.   

Fixed that for you

[Veronique Bette]

9 hours ago, merylinkid said:

The kid was only in that thing long enough for the picture to be taken.   Then the nanny stepped in and put the kid in the real crib.   

For sure. Kim probably has no clue about crib safety. Why would she? She's not the one tending to her little accessories ... er, I mean babies... in their daily lives. (Ditto with her sisters, who probably have never changed a diaper in their lives. That's what they pay the nannies for.) So baby Psalm and the rest of the tiny tykes in this family are most likely not at any risk. But hopefully her minions, AKA fans, don't try to copy this crib decor for their own little babies, where most likely, there is no vigilant nanny on duty.

[iwasish]

The funny thing is, it’s not even an out of the ordinary crib or bedding. Nothing special or even unusual about it, it’s just blah. 

[Cocoa Puff]

26 minutes ago, iwasish said:

The funny thing is, it’s not even an out of the ordinary crib or bedding. Nothing special or even unusual about it, it’s just blah. 

Actually this crib is about $5,000 and I've seen it in a lot of celebrity homes and it's from celebrity baby hotspot Petit tresor in Los Angeles but a quick Google search found several knock-offs.

https://www.petittresor.com/nursery-furniture/cribs/all-baby-cribs/petit-tresor-exclusive-lucite-crib.html

[iwasish]

1 hour ago, carolinagirl81 said:

Actually this crib is about $5,000 and I've seen it in a lot of celebrity homes and it's from celebrity baby hotspot Petit tresor in Los Angeles but a quick Google search found several knock-offs.

https://www.petittresor.com/nursery-furniture/cribs/all-baby-cribs/petit-tresor-exclusive-lucite-crib.html

From the pic in the link it looks like something you put a hamster in.

no kid needs a 5k crib even if 5k is pennies to  the parents. It’s just an example of excess for excess sake. 

[merylinkid]

For 5K it's really blah.    I mean, I know Kimmie into neutral tones but how icky.    The kid's little rods and cones are never going to develop to see color in all that beige.

[BitterApple]

10 hours ago, merylinkid said:

For 5K it's really blah.    I mean, I know Kimmie into neutral tones but how icky.    The kid's little rods and cones are never going to develop to see color in all that beige.

Maybe that's why Chicago seems so dim. There's no stimulation in that empty, beige cube of a house.

[suomi]

Quote

Mary Ann's 11-year-old son, Christopher, was sleeping over at a neighbor's home in Chino Hills, California, when he was murdered in 1983.

Kim has quickly become one of the most popular women in prison, and, according to TMZ, she's being referred to among inmates as "The Princess of Prison Reform."

There is some validity to the nickname. According to a May 7 report, Kim has quietly and successfully helped free 17 inmates over the past few months by funding the 90 days of Freedom campaign, which was spearheaded by lawyers Brittany K. Barnett and MiAngel Cody of the nonprofit law firm Decarceration Collective. The 17 inmates were all serving incredibly long sentences — some of them life sentences without parole — for low-level drug offenses.In Kevin's case, she's successfully lobbied California Governors Jerry Brown and Gavin Newsom to order additional DNA testing in Kevin's case. Kim's hopes the results will show that the death row inmate is innocent.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/tv/celebrity/kim-kardashian-angers-victims-mother-with-inmate-involvement/ar-AAChEQh

[iwasish]

I hope this blows up in her face. “Low Level drug offenses” are one thing. Mass murderers/ rapists are another. 

There is tons of evidence pointing to his guilt. Having her picture taken with her head on his shoulder is insulting to the families of the victims. IF he were PROVEN innocent, that might be appropriate, but never tasteful.. 

A guy who killed children, close to the ages of her own and her nieces and nephew. Wise choice to put her efforts into. She probably got off on reading the descriptions of what was done to those people. 

[howmanywords]

I think this is one case that will be a lost cause. I did a lot of reading about this case. The murders were so brutal and inhumane. There is a ton of evidence that makes Kevin look guilty. There's been a lot of controversy over the years about the murders and a question mark regarding his guilt. 48 Hours did a story about it and they agreed there were discrepancies with some of the evidence. And while there was a lot of doubt regarding DNA and possible tampering of evidence this guy did admit to rape and had a long list of burglaries before the murders. Even if this additional DNA testing shows something that the initial testing didn't show, rape is not on the same level as drugs. Then again sadly there have been rapists who haven't even done a year in prison.

[BeeBop88]

22 hours ago, iwasish said:

I hope this blows up in her face. “Low Level drug offenses” are one thing. Mass murderers/ rapists are another. 

There is tons of evidence pointing to his guilt. Having her picture taken with her head on his shoulder is insulting to the families of the victims. IF he were PROVEN innocent, that might be appropriate, but never tasteful.. 

A guy who killed children, close to the ages of her own and her nieces and nephew. Wise choice to put her efforts into. She probably got off on reading the descriptions of what was done to those people. 

I hope those DNA results come back and bite Kim in her fat ass. Would be great if it proves the guy's guilt.  She should not be messing around with getting murderers and rapists out of prison. Very bad PR. Stick to the low level crimes.

Edited June 4, 2019 by BeeBop88

[BitterApple]

12 hours ago, BeeBop88 said:

She should not be messing around with getting murderers and rapists out of prison. Very bad PR. Stick to the low level crimes.

I agree. People doing ten years for weed busts is the group Kim needs to focus on. Murder and rape is an entirely different level. 

[nexxie]

15 hours ago, BeeBop88 said:

I hope those DNA results come back and bite Kim in her fat ass. Would be great if it proves the guy's guilt.  She should not be messing around with getting murderers and rapists out of prison. Very bad PR. Stick to the low level crimes.

The point is that not all people branded “murderers and rapists” and thrown into prison are actually guilty. 

[BeeBop88]

48 minutes ago, nexxie said:

The point is that not all people branded “murderers and rapists” and thrown into prison are actually guilty. 

That is true. But the vast majority are guilty. I think there are a lot of prison inmates that might now be taking advantage of Kim because she was partly responsible for getting Alice out. And it is  a good possibility that some of these inmates are guilty of murder and rape and whatever. DNA doesn't lie. So in the case of Kevin, the DNA results will say it all. I am a skeptical person, so I am slow in believing people who claim innocence after they are convicted of their crimes.

[GaT]

39 minutes ago, BeeBop88 said:

That is true. But the vast majority are guilty. I think there are a lot of prison inmates that might now be taking advantage of Kim because she was partly responsible for getting Alice out. And it is  a good possibility that some of these inmates are guilty of murder and rape and whatever. DNA doesn't lie. So in the case of Kevin, the DNA results will say it all. I am a skeptical person, so I am slow in believing people who claim innocence after they are convicted of their crimes.

I once saw some show on the Innocence Project which is an organization pretty much like the one Kim is working with. They showed how they tried to get DNA testing or other evidence that would exonerate convicted criminals.  They showed one of the lawyers calling a guy in prison to tell him the result of his DNA testing. It was him, his DNA was at the crime scene, so obviously he did it. I don't know if he thought he could somehow fool the test, or thought that they wouldn't be able to confirm it, but he had to know he did the crime, & was probably just hoping they would get him out anyway. I bet a lot of the people contacting Kim are doing the same thing, they think that her fame is going to get them out, even if they did it.

[iwasish]

If she wants to pose with him, head on shoulder, she should have the brains to do it AFTER the DNA results are in and if they are in his favor. 

And she’s not doing anything other than funding these appeals, saying she’s responsible for the inmates getting released isn’t accurate. The leg  work is done by others. 

[Veronique Bette]

I have no opinion about this particular man's guilt or innocence because I cannot bring myself to read the details of such a nightmarish crime. But I am puzzled that Kim would take on any case that involved violence or even the threat of violence to frightened victims. After all, it was only a few years ago that Kim found herself tied up, traumatized and begging for her life during the Paris robbery, thinking that she was going to die and never see her children again.

Edited June 4, 2019 by Veronique Bette
typo

[BrainyBlonde]

The Kardashians' bad track record with pets continues. Apparently, that hamster Khloe got North didn't last long. I hope they (meaning the assistants!) were taking proper care of the poor thing. SIGH

Kim's Reaction to the Untimely Demise of Blacktail

[howmanywords]

This guy has been contacting organizations and news outlets for several years trying to let his side of the story be known so its not like he got wind of what Kim has been doing and decided to see if he can spin a tale. Here's the thing though and this is rich, back in 84 he told the cops exactly what pieces of evidence they should check because these were the pieces of evidence he believed would clear him. Guess what? Nope. Even the evidence he swore would prove his innocence turned out to be a dead end and just sealed his fate more. The other persons DNA was one of the victims. Just a hunch but I think this new DNA test that was ordered was done just to pacify him. This is not some guy who fell on the wrong side of the tracks who shouldn't be in prison. Kim has probably heard all the stuff pointing to any bit of reasonable doubt and is buying it. The defense is clinging to tampered DNA but the other evidence is extremely incriminating.

[iwasish]

1 hour ago, BrainyBlonde said:

The Kardashians' bad track record with pets continues. Apparently, that hamster Khloe got North didn't last long. I hope they (meaning the assistants!) were taking proper care of the poor thing. SIGH

Kim's Reaction to the Untimely Demise of Blacktail

Her ass is huge. 

 Could she smile anymore in that whole scene?

Hamster cages do not belong on a kitchen counter.

wonder if she’ll film Norths reaction to the death? If not I’m sure she’ll share it with her sisters or mother on camera. 

[iwasish]

1 hour ago, Veronique Bette said:

I have no opinion about this particular's man guilt or innocence because I cannot bring myself to read the details of such a nightmarish crime. But I am puzzled that Kim would take on any case that involved violence or even the threat of violence to frightened victims. After all, it was only a few years ago that Kim found herself tied up, traumatized and begging for her life during the Paris robbery, thinking that she was going to die and never see her children again.

Or that her mother’s good friend was nearly decapitated in a bloody scene. And that the “newness” of DNA helped get her murderer off. 

[merylinkid]

On 6/4/2019 at 1:56 PM, iwasish said:

If she wants to pose with him, head on shoulder, she should have the brains to do it AFTER the DNA results are in and if they are in his favor. 

And she’s not doing anything other than funding these appeals, saying she’s responsible for the inmates getting released isn’t accurate. The leg  work is done by others. 

She's not picking the cases either.   Inmates might see her as their savior that they can dupe like this guy, but its the law firm that is vetting and deciding which cases to take up.   Kimmie just writes the checks.    I highly doubt she is directing them what cases to take.   Or if she is making suggestions they are anything more than suggestions.

Taking on this case is on the firm.   They picked badly this time.   It happens.

[iwasish]

1 hour ago, merylinkid said:

She's not picking the cases either.   Inmates might see her as their savior that they can dupe like this guy, but its the law firm that is vetting and deciding which cases to take up.   Kimmie just writes the checks.    I highly doubt she is directing them what cases to take.   Or if she is making suggestions they are anything more than suggestions.

Taking on this case is on the firm.   They picked badly this time.   It happens.

She’s still a fool for visiting and posting pics. 

[RHJunkie]

4 hours ago, merylinkid said:

She's not picking the cases either.   Inmates might see her as their savior that they can dupe like this guy, but its the law firm that is vetting and deciding which cases to take up.   Kimmie just writes the checks.    I highly doubt she is directing them what cases to take.   Or if she is making suggestions they are anything more than suggestions.

Taking on this case is on the firm.   They picked badly this time.   It happens.

I can't imagine there not being some level of agreeance on her part as she's writing cheques and using her fame and likeness in hopes of gaining some kind of benefit in proving the man's innocence. While it's my personal opinion that for all of the great values Kim says her father taught them, I think she has built her fortune on selling out on almost all of those values but that said, I don't think Kim is stupid. She's riding the fence here. If it works out, she'll be part of the accolades being dished out but if it blows up in their faces, she'll put it on the firm. Firms review tons of cases, I highly doubt there weren't more available to consider and I highly doubt Kim would have lawyers crafting contracts that stipulate that will dish out money and her time yet be completely at the mercy of the firm and their case choices when it's Kim that is the one taking the biggest risk. 

[merylinkid]

21 minutes ago, RHJunkie said:

I can't imagine there not being some level of agreeance on her part as she's writing cheques and using her fame and likeness in hopes of gaining some kind of benefit in proving the man's innocence. While it's my personal opinion that for all of the great values Kim says her father taught them, I think she has built her fortune on selling out on almost all of those values but that said, I don't think Kim is stupid. She's riding the fence here. If it works out, she'll be part of the accolades being dished out but if it blows up in their faces, she'll put it on the firm. Firms review tons of cases, I highly doubt there weren't more available to consider and I highly doubt Kim would have lawyers crafting contracts that stipulate that will dish out money and her time yet be completely at the mercy of the firm and their case choices when it's Kim that is the one taking the biggest risk. 

Legal ethics say that is exactly how it works.   Nonlawyers cannot direct the work of law firms.

[iwasish]

2 hours ago, merylinkid said:

Legal ethics say that is exactly how it works.   Nonlawyers cannot direct the work of law firms.

She can fund the cause all she wants, the law  firm alone picks the cases that it wants to work on. But I don’t think they can make her take photos with a convicted killer. That’s my big complaint. That to me shows a huge lack of compassion for the families of the multiple victims in this grisly case. Doesn’t she remember the big split in her own family when OJ was charged with killing Nicole?  

Is she stupidly channeling her father who stood by a murderer, was basically used by the defense to hold his hand thru the trial to keep him from showing his temper and arrogance in the courtroom?

I think this guy is guilty as sin and the test will prove it. Kim is lucky in that regard, otherwise he could be creeping thru her house late some night. And she might lose more than just some baubles. 

[RHJunkie]

3 hours ago, merylinkid said:

Legal ethics say that is exactly how it works.   Nonlawyers cannot direct the work of law firms.

I'm not a lawyer and I don't have a law background so what you're saying could be absolutely correct, but I don't see how that would make any sense. Kim having a choice in the kind of cases that SHE wants to fund is not her directing the work of the law firm. The law firm can access other means to do their work for cases that Kim doesn't agree with because that's what they would have done before she began her partnership with them. So I don't see how being selective with her financial support is a breach of legal ethics. I don't see how it's any different from law firms that turn down a case because someone doesn't have enough money to pay the legal fees. And even if she couldn't control how her money is spent in this particular case, I would think she could control her image of visiting him in jail, taking happy pictures with him, using her celebrity to expedite testing that could potentially exonerate him, and she must have been able to exercise some level of personal control in her choice to publically proclaim his innocence before any of the requested testing was completed with conclusive results.

[iwasish]

6 minutes ago, RHJunkie said:

I'm not a lawyer and I don't have a law background so what you're saying could be absolutely correct, but I don't see how that would make any sense. Kim having a choice in the kind of cases that SHE wants to fund is not her directing the work of the law firm. The law firm can access other means to do their work for cases that Kim doesn't agree with because that's what they would have done before she began her partnership with them. So I don't see how being selective with her financial support is a breach of legal ethics. I don't see how it's any different from law firms that turn down a case because someone doesn't have enough money to pay the legal fees. And even if she couldn't control how her money is spent in this particular case, I would think she could control her image of visiting him in jail, taking happy pictures with him, using her celebrity to expedite testing that could potentially exonerate him, and she must have been able to exercise some level of personal control in her choice to publically proclaim his innocence before any of the requested testing was completed with conclusive results.

The court has control of any Evidence in this case. It will have to direct that it be retested. I doubt the defense has any inside information that would give them irrefutable proof of his innocence.  

Kim’s a fool for commenting and posing at this point in time.

[BitterApple]

Kim should've waited for the DNA results, bottom line. I don't think she spends hours researching details and reading court transcripts of these cases. More like she (or her publicist or assistant or whoever) meets with the defense, they say "this is our cause du jour" and she jumps on board and starts Tweeting. 

[iwasish]

29 minutes ago, BitterApple said:

Kim should've waited for the DNA results, bottom line. I don't think she spends hours researching details and reading court transcripts of these cases. More like she (or her publicist or assistant or whoever) meets with the defense, they say "this is our cause du jour" and she jumps on board and starts Tweeting. 

She’s gotten very arrogant since she hooked up with Kanye and especially since he had his melt down. I wonder if she has any understanding now for what Kourtney went thru with Scott. Though Scott and Kanye have different issues, dealing with them must be incredibly stressful, never knowing when the shit will hit the fan. 

[BeeBop88]

I must have missed it, but when did Kim and Paris Hilton become friends again? I saw her at the Xmas party on the show and was rather surprised.  Just who is sucking up to who? 

[Aw my lahgs]

12 hours ago, BeeBop88 said:

I must have missed it, but when did Kim and Paris Hilton become friends again? I saw her at the Xmas party on the show and was rather surprised.  Just who is sucking up to who? 

Paris who? She’s a total nobody now. I guess she’s trying to make herself relevant again. Only now it’s the other way around 

[Magog]

57 minutes ago, Aw my lahgs said:

Paris who? She’s a total nobody now. I guess she’s trying to make herself relevant again. Only now it’s the other way around 

I rather have Paris Hilton around than Kim & that disgusting family. At least, Paris has some sense of humility. Kim wouldn't know a thing about humility. 

[iwasish]

2 hours ago, Magog said:

I rather have Paris Hilton around than Kim & that disgusting family. At least, Paris has some sense of humility. Kim wouldn't know a thing about humility. 

She supposedly learned all about humility when she was robbed.   That was short lived. 

[howmanywords]

18 hours ago, BeeBop88 said:

I must have missed it, but when did Kim and Paris Hilton become friends again? I saw her at the Xmas party on the show and was rather surprised.  Just who is sucking up to who? 

She's been at, hmm I wanna say the last 3 parties. They've definitely been chummy again a good couple of years. Then recently Paris recorded a song called "My Best Friends Ass" and Kim was in the video (I may have lost so.e brain cells watching it).

[BeeBop88]

21 minutes ago, howmanywords said:

She's been at, hmm I wanna say the last 3 parties. They've definitely been chummy again a good couple of years. Then recently Paris recorded a song called "My Best Friends Ass" and Kim was in the video (I may have lost so.e brain cells watching it).

Oh, that is so funny about the video. I will have to search that out on YouTube.  I am not a fan of any of that family (as people can tell by my posts), but there is the train wreck factor that I am into. And the Kardashians don't disappoint, it's just one train wreck after another.