Jump to content

Type keyword(s) to search

Ratings: Heroes Always Get Up


Recommended Posts

If anyone can think of a better title for the thread, feel free to suggest changes.

 

Anyway, here's where we are after the debut (source is Yahoo! TV).  I think it sounds pretty awesome; what do y'all think? 

 

The premiere of the series, from Dan Fogelman and Alan Menken, drew a 2.1 rating among adults 18-49 at 8 PM and 7.8 total viewers against football-buoyed Fox comedies.
Edited by legaleagle53
Link to comment

If those ratings hold up over the next three weeks, I'd say that this show stands an excellent chance of being renewed.  Fans are already clamoring for a second season on Twitter.

 

I think the decision to double up episodes for a four-week run was a brilliant idea.  This limited-run approach will hopefully keep viewers from getting burned out too soon.  If this approach is done permanently (with the show alternating between half-seasons of OUAT and being promoted constantly during that show's run), it could be around for a long time.

Link to comment

I'm a chalice half full type, so I'll wait & see whether Galavant ends victorious or falls off the horse completely come the finale, before considering whether I'd like a 2nd bite of the cherry.

 

I see what you did there!  :)

  • Love 1
Link to comment

ABC decided to rebroadcast this tomorrow instead of an episode of Forever.

 

I have no idea what that means.

Link to comment

Is that everywhere, or up to affiliates? My local listings still show Forever for tonight, but an encore of Galavant on Saturday at 7:00.

 

ETA: And there seems to be a glitch on ABC's website. I click on Tonight's Schedule, and it takes me to the week of Dec 21 and says "This schedule unavailable."

Edited by majormama
Link to comment

The only reason the show is on in the time slot it's on is because it's what they're filling time with till Once Upon a Time comes back.

Judging from the previews of that show, I'd rather more Galavant. Since when is Cruella de Vil a fairy tale character? Or is Disney populating this show with only its own characters?
  • Love 1
Link to comment

I am sad, TV by the numbers lists this show as "Certain to be Cancelled".  I think it works great as a mid-season limited series.  At the very least, I hope there is a DVD released with lots of extras.  Joshua Sasse said that there were lots and lots of botched scenes that could fill a gag reel.

  • Love 2
Link to comment

Was there ever any indication that that was an option?

It's always an option. Under the Dome was originally supposed to be a one-and-done season but it got such good ratings, it got renewed.

Link to comment

Judging from the previews of that show, I'd rather more Galavant. Since when is Cruella de Vil a fairy tale character? Or is Disney populating this show with only its own characters?

Well, I understand that ABC and Disney are linked so I am not surprised at the more recent  (to me, at least) 'fairy tale' characters showing up on OUAT. That's when they started to lose me.

Link to comment
(edited)

Yeah, I have to think that the powers in charge would have to take into account what Galavant faced as competition this month, starting with the playoffs and the Golden Globes the second and third weeks and the SAG Awards and the Miss Universe pageant last night.  Even Once Upon a Time itself would have an uphill battle going against all that.

Edited by legaleagle53
  • Love 2
Link to comment

Yeah, I have to think that the powers in charge would have to take into account what Galavant faced as competition this month, starting with the playoffs and the Golden Globes the second and third weeks and the SAG Awards and the Miss Universe pageant last night. Even Once Upon a Time itself would have an uphill battle going against all that.

I agree with all of this.

Link to comment

Was there ever any indication that that was an option?

When it comes to network TV, I rarely believe them when they say something is a mini-series/limited series. 

 

As for Galavant, I believe it was originally picked up as a series and not a mini-series.  Therefore, the writers/producers thought that they were writing a series with a potential for a second season like any other series, even if the order was reduced. 

Link to comment

A 0.9 rating for last nights premiere, which is rather disastrous. That is less than half of last season's premiere, and equal to the lowest rating that we've had, which was against the conference title game last year. Not looking good.

Link to comment

After watching the first song for like the fifth time I was curious..,how were the ratings?

TheRabbi posted, about 4 or so posts upthread, it got a 0.9. Which is worse than last year, even with similar Sunday night competition.

Edited by BW Manilowe
Link to comment

At least the 0.9 is 18-49 demo, not total ratings. It had 3.22 million viewers in all. Am I completely off base in thinking a period piece musical rom-com  just might appeal more to older and younger crowds than young-to-middle-aged adults?

  • Love 1
Link to comment
×
×
  • Create New...