Jump to content

Type keyword(s) to search

Super Social Analysis: Gender, Race, Ethnicity, and LGBT in Movies


  • Reply
  • Start Topic

Recommended Posts

This one is even worse, for me, and quite telling.

 

Well, this brings up something I had noted in the gender thread on TWoP; even if the lead of a animated film is female, most if not all of her supporting characters will be male. And villains (and their supporting characters) tend to be male too.

 

Toy Story 2 seems to be missing from that graph, though. Jesse was a significant character in that one.

 

ETA: Interesting that Tangled managed to get a fairly even percentage with only two notable female characters. I guess they did a lot of talking!

Edited by Trini
  • Love 1
Link to comment

I don't think anything here is surprising, sadly. There was a study a while back from The Geena Davis Institute for Gender in Media that found for men, as soon as something is around 20% women, men perceive that as being 50-50. That's pretty much backed up here. The men (because statistically, its mostly men) writing these stories probably thought that they'd done a very good job representing both men and women. Literally, we cannot expect change until there are more women behind the scenes writing and directing because even men who want to do better do not perceive the issue the same way women do.

Edited by vibeology
  • Love 4
Link to comment

#AsianTwitter is going in H.A.M. about the whitewashing in Ghost in the Shell and Doctor Strange movies.  I don't know these movies so I will just show you links from Google.

 

http://www.hitfix.com/harpy/marvel-tries-to-explain-away-their-whitewashing-of-doctor-strange-ancient-one

 

https://thenerdsofcolor.org/2015/06/01/hollywoods-strange-erasure-of-asian-characters/

 

http://www.themarysue.com/ghost-in-the-shell-whitewashing-complex/

 

http://www.hitfix.com/movies/doctor-strange

Edited by Ms Blue Jay
  • Love 1
Link to comment

I wonder how many fanboys who are all "There shouldn't be any black/brown people in fantasy movies because there weren't any in Arthurian legend!" are now "Scarlett Johansson is totally unacceptable for a science fiction role about a Japanese woman!"

 

I also wonder if Benedict Cumberbatch told Tilda Swinton "Hey, you're probably going to take some crap for taking this role. I speak from experience!"

  • Love 1
Link to comment

I wonder how many fanboys who are all "There shouldn't be any black/brown people in fantasy movies because there weren't any in Arthurian legend!" are now "Scarlett Johansson is totally unacceptable for a science fiction role about a Japanese woman!"

 

I also wonder if Benedict Cumberbatch told Tilda Swinton "Hey, you're probably going to take some crap for taking this role. I speak from experience!"

I don't think the fanboys were a bunch of racists that hated ethnics. I think they are purists that don't like race changes, especially to major characters, so it totally lines up with hating whitewashing Japanese manga or anything else. 

  • Love 1
Link to comment

Fanboys (or anyone else) complaining about Scarlett Johansson not being the right ethnicity for Ghost in the Shell can do one. I can't remember ever seeing a Japanese anime movie where the characters actually looked Japanese. They always look like they're Westerners, and Ghost in the Shell was no different, as far as I can recall.

Edited by Danny Franks
Link to comment

Fanboys (or anyone else) complaining about Scarlett Johansson not being the right ethnicity for Ghost in the Shell can do one. I can't remember ever seeing a Japanese anime movie where the characters actually looked Japanese. They always look like they're Westerners, and Ghost in the Shell was no different, as far as I can recall.

The Face of the Other

Racial markings in manga, therefore, are generally relative. By contrast, an American comic book set in Japan or China would most likely portray every character with stereotyped racial signifiers (and probably with contrived accents, as well). It may be that Westerners, accustomed to non-relative, standardized racial markers, are baffled by the Japanese system of relative signification, in which a single artist may portray a Chinese character one way in one story (set in Japan), and very differently in another (set in China).

tl;dr - They look like that to you because you are from the West and are used to seeing white as the default. Japanese people have no problems identifying those characters as Japanese. 

 

I don't think it's really an objective given that this character is supposed to be white:

11kaxyp.jpg

Edited by galax-arena
  • Love 5
Link to comment

That's interesting, thanks for the info. It makes a lot of sense, and I don't doubt that Japanese viewers can identify characters as Japanese. But I don't quite see how it works in all cases. Such as with characters who have blue or green eyes, which are very common in anime. Because those traits are not as ambiguous and lacking in racial signifiers.

 

But I would argue that the style in which these characters are drawn adheres more to Western stereotypes, as demonstrated here:

 

18289orcg9293jpg.jpg

 

And this would make sense, given Japan's strong connections with the USA, and their exposure to American culture. So you've got the likes of Sailor Moon, Fist of the North Star, Ghost in the Shell etc, which follow this style, but then there are movies like Jin-Roh (which I found while doing a bit of reading around your information), which present what would be more identifiable to me as Japanese characters:

 

Kazuki_Fuse.JPG

 

The differences are fairly subtle, but I definitely see them. I feel like I'd identify this character as Japanese. Of course, when you want to sell your movie around the world, making the characters racially ambiguous and able to be accepted by a wide audience only makes sense. But it does seem like a subject that requires a lot more thought....

Link to comment
And this would make sense, given Japan's strong connections with the USA, and their exposure to American culture. So you've got the likes of Sailor Moon, Fist of the North Star, Ghost in the Shell etc, which follow this style, but then there are movies like Jin-Roh (which I found while doing a bit of reading around your information), which present what would be more identifiable to me as Japanese characters:

 

The thing about anime is that even though the characters are not styled to be Japanese, the Japanese viewing audience accepts that the characters are Japanese unless told otherwise. This happens often. Sailor Moon is a good example of because even though most of the senshi do not look characteristically Japanese, the characters lead very normal Japanese teenage girl lives when not being superheroines. It's one of the things that made the show popular; it had identifiable and relatable themes of friendship of young women.  When Mina/Venus (who is blonde) talks about living in England on exchange, no one questions her being Caucasian because she isn't. Japanese anime does tend to adopt a lot of the Western aesthetics (especially European) in the architecture, interior design, costuming, etc., but not always on the look of the characters. That can also be very exaggerated.

  • Love 2
Link to comment

From the Doctor Strange thread:

 

For me, the situation is a little like casting Rooney Mara as Tiger Lily in Pan. While the original character as written was racially problematic, I don't see casting a white person as rectifying the problem, just avoiding it. Instead of backing away from the issue, making your film less diverse in the process, why not meet challenge of figuring out how to write/perform this Asian character in a way that's three-dimensional and not stereotypical/uncomfortable?

 

Hat tip to angora for great summation. Some of the discussion on the thread reminded me of something that I've often noticed...

 

It was probably inevitable, but one of the things I sometimes find disheartening in online racial discourse is the notion that providing multiple sides of an issue is being overly "PC" or "minorities just can't win because they have to represent all things to their people." To me, that's not the point of circumspection.  Yes, some opinions can get ridiculous, but that's a possibility with any debate.  I've reconsidered my POV on some topics because I read various, sometimes conflicting, perspectives on race and ethnicity on film (and TV).  It's not always about one "side" being "right" as much as bringing to light just how much the Anglophilic, Westernized film lens distorts and/or suppresses the narratives of those who don't fit into that scope.  

 

For example, I'm not Japanese, so I found the Twitter thread that Ms Blue Jay linked to about Ghost in the Shell interesting and a perspective I never considered, even while in general agreement about the whitewashing of the film. Also, the link galax-arena provided about racial markings in manga was also enlightening because, again, not a perspective I considered before.  Anyway, I appreciate the discussion.   

Edited by ribboninthesky1
  • Love 4
Link to comment

When a POV threatens somebody, they may fight it with a black or white shut-down or hyperbolic argument.  It's all or nothing - no nuance.  But you're right -- these issues have nuances.    The arguments you see on social media like "Didn't you ever think that maybe Scarlett is the best actor for the role?"  Or "Did you ever think that there are no good Japanese actors?"  or "So we have to cast minorities even if they're bad for the role?" are such dumbing down of the issue.  Same thing happened with #OscarsSoWhite.

 

I saw a great tweet today.  So good that I screencapped it:

 

ridley.jpg

Edited by Ms Blue Jay
Link to comment

Welp, you knew that the defense of the casting by the movie's director was coming sooner or later :)

 

http://www.ew.com/article/2016/04/16/ghost-shell-scarlett-johnasson-casting-max-landis?xid=entertainment-weekly_socialflow_twitter

 

His defense is that only a handful of actors can get movies made, and they're all white.

But isn't he, an uber-privileged son of a famous director who gets everything handed to him, the perfect person to change that?

 

Whatever... according to other people in this biz the guy is a wank anyway.

Edited by Ms Blue Jay
  • Love 1
Link to comment

And as long as Hollywood keeps on casting whites in these roles, keeps perpetuating that mindset, there never will be any Asian A-listers.

 

I know we all LOVE Aaron Sorkin around here, but I particularly ADORED him when he revealed his reluctance about adapting Flash Boys in the Sony hack emails:

 

 

“The protagonist is Asian-American (Actually Asian-Canadian) and there aren’t any Asian movie stars.”

 

So let's not even try, Hollywood.

  • Love 3
Link to comment

Nice point under that EW article by somebody:

 

A virtually unknown Indian-American actor was cast in the lead of The Jungle Book and that movie is doing well. So saying that an A-list actor is the only way for Ghost In A Shell to do well in theaters doesn't hold water for me.

 

People will always come in and say "There are already built in fanbases for The Jungle Book/ Star Wars so it's totally different scenarios."   I guess the GITS fanbase is not big enough.   There will always be detractors who make up a bunch of BS bullshit reasons to justify Scarlett getting cast.  If you couldn't get the film greenlit without Scarlett being cast, then why do you need to make that movie?  I think, and hope, that it will bomb anyway.

 

Article, How "Nina" (as in Simone) became a Disaster Movie"

 

https://www.buzzfeed.com/kateaurthur/how-nina-became-a-disaster-movie#.jdqDqpPbO

Edited by Ms Blue Jay
  • Love 4
Link to comment

With the exception of St Vincent and an episode or two of her series, I've never been tempted to see one of her movies and don't expect to.

But you know what? I rarely see new comedies these days, because the industry has apparently been taken over by comedies about dull, shiftless, ordinary-looking, unpleasant zhlubs (why yes, I am looking at you, Ben Stiller and Seth Rogen, the more conventionally attractive but noisomely slimy Seth MacFarlane, and back to John Belushi and Jerry Lewis) getting the girl, the gold watch and everything. And the girl has to be way above average.

Not, mind you, because in the course of the movie they rise above their less pleasant qualities and become someone who's earned respect, who it might be rewarding for a woman to be involved with, but because they want it so bad, and that's all it takes.

I've said it before, I'll say it again. If Melissa McCarthy has managed to carve out a career for herself where people will go to the theater to watch a woman be the brutish wish-fulfillment id of the story, I say good on her, and I wish her well making a long series of very successful terrible movies I'm never going to see.

Edited by Julia
  • Love 3
Link to comment

And as long as Hollywood keeps on casting whites in these roles, keeps perpetuating that mindset, there never will be any Asian A-listers.

This also reminds me of how, during the #OscarsSoWhite backlash, some people were criticizing Asians for not speaking up. The thing is, Asian actors WERE speaking up, it's just that there aren't a lot of Asian A-listers so they were hardly being given the same amount of attention that other actors were. (Especially not by those desperate to turn this into a "those whiny black people complaining again" issue.) Constance Wu in particular has been incredibly vocal about diversity since day one, but despite her being the breakout actress from Fresh Off the Boat, she's hardly in the same league as Meryl Streep. The major mainstream media outlets don't care what she has to say about diversity. 

 

And that's never gonna change if Ghost in the Shell type whitewashing keeps on happening! 

Edited by galax-arena
  • Love 6
Link to comment

Because I'm a sucker for a list; who are the closest thing we have to Asian "A-listers"? (Be broad and/or go back one or two decades if you must)

 

Off the top of my head: Ben Kingsley, Jackie Chan, Michelle Yeoh, Jon Cho, Lucy Liu.

Edited by Trini
  • Love 3
Link to comment

Weren't there some Japanese actresses in the Wolverine movie? I'm sure one Japanese actress would have been fine to play the same role as Scarlett. Just pisses me off. There is a lot of diversity on TV- why can't movies be the same? Jungle Book made a whopping 50 million this weekend in China and the lead was an Indian kid. I find it hard to believe that casting minority actors in major roles is going to cause movies to bomb both here and overseas. P

Edited by twoods
  • Love 2
Link to comment

As someone who loves Melissa McCarthy but doesn't love all her movies, (still haven't seen Tammy and don't plan too), this is a great article. I don't understand people who say she is the same in everything. Yes, there can be a bit of vulgarity in her comedies but I think she put in a lot of years as sweet Sookie on Gilmore Girls and is making up for it.

  • Love 5
Link to comment

Like many actors, she benefits from a strong director, like Paul Feig. The bad ones seem to be the ones directed by her husband. Puts her in the same category as a lot of actors.

I think she's in a sub category because I can't think of another movie star who does bad collaborations with their spouse that are still box office successes.

Link to comment

I think she's in a sub category because I can't think of another movie star who does bad collaborations with their spouse that are still box office successes.

Paul W. Anderson and Milla Jovovich, the Resident Evil series & Len Wiseman and Kate Beckinsale, the Underworld series. (Former spouses now though)

Link to comment

Because I'm a sucker for a list; who are the closest thing we have to Asian "A-listers"? (Be broad and/or go back one or two decades if you must)

 

Off the top of my head: Ben Kingsley, Jackie Chan, Michelle Yeoh, Jon Cho, Lucy Liu.

 

Nerds of Color had an article about this in a rebuttal to Sorkin's comment. They listed: Keanu Reeves, The Rock, Lucy Liu, John Cho, and Sung Kang.

 

Weren't there some Japanese actresses in the Wolverine movie? I'm sure one Japanese actress would have been fine to play the same role as Scarlett. Just pisses me off. There is a lot of diversity on TV- why can't movies be the same? Jungle Book made a whopping 50 million this weekend in China and the lead was an Indian kid. I find it hard to believe that casting minority actors in major roles is going to cause movies to bomb both here and overseas. P

 

This poses an interesting question because a lot of Hollywood movies make most of their money overseas now especially in China. Fast & Furious (which had a whole movie set in Asia) has a diverse cast and its probably one of the reasons the franchise is so popular. The Michael Bay Transformers movies are being marketed more to Asians too, but it still features largely Caucasian actors. It's as if they are doing everything to make the movies more profitable outside the West except not actually being diverse in casting.

  • Love 3
Link to comment

I agree; thank you for sharing it.  I especially love his bewilderment at the "she always plays the same role" complaints. 

 

You're so welcome!  Glad that people enjoyed it.

Edited by Ms Blue Jay
  • Love 1
Link to comment

I fricking love Cliff Curtis, but I personally wouldn't say he's A-List.

 

Daniel Dae Kim (I almost wrote Lewis, seriously) has a pretty good profile but I wouldn't say A-List.

Randall Park had a great profile after The Interview.

I'd say Freida Pinto and Dev Patel come kind of close.  Freida's worked with Woody Allen, and Dev worked with Aaron Sorkin (LOL) for The Newsroom.

Aziz Ansari?  Mindy Kaling?

Jackie Chan and Jet Li at different points of their career?

Zhang Ziyi was a big deal when Crouching Tiger came out.

The most famous Japanese actress in America is Rinko Kikuchi I'd say (I could totally be blanking on someone):  Pacific Rim, The Brothers Bloom, Babel and she models for Chanel a lot.

 

Reading Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson's Wikipedia profile now -- I am ashamed that I didn't know all of this background.   He's even considered Canadian as well as American, his father being Black Nova Scotian.  I assumed he was a visible minority, I just didn't know what his background was at all.  I assumed half black and white or Latino or something; never thought too deep about it.   His background seems ultra interesting. 

 

Did not know that about Ben Kingsley at all.  Assumed he was British/white.  I'm getting really educated here.

Edited by Ms Blue Jay
  • Love 1
Link to comment

Chow Yun Fat at some points?  Steven Yeun from The Walking Dead has a pretty good profile ;)  He's like the Daniel Dae Kim of the 2010s :)  Parminda Nagra at some points.

Edited by Ms Blue Jay
  • Love 1
Link to comment

Why isn't Melissa McCarthy getting the same type of roles that John Candy or Chris Farley got? They were usually cast as likable people if they weren't always smart. She has been cast as a criminal in some of her movies and not likable in others. The trailers for The Boss don't inspire me to see the rest of the movie.

  • Love 1
Link to comment

Yeah, Freida Pinto and Dev Patel are close, not quite.

Jet Li I didn't mention because he's only famous for action films; although Jackie Chan I include without any qualifiers.

Zhang Ziyi is 'A-list' -- just not on this continent.

 

With the current controversy over Ghost in the Shell, I feel bad I can't think of more Japanese/Japanese-American actors. Only Hiroyuki Sanada comes to mind. (I haven't seen a lot of his work, but I've been impressed with everything I have seen him in.)

  • Love 1
Link to comment

I get that no one wants to play "likable" all the time (nor do I expect them to), but Melissa McCarthy's foul-mouthed and obnoxious routine is not only not that funny to me (I blame the material, not her), it's becoming just as tiresome as James Franco's abrasive, motor-mouthed stoner character, or Simon Pegg's bumbling nerd shtick. Okay, we get it, McCarthy's a gal who's as crass as any dude, but is a little variety asking too much? The same old thing is the same old thing, that's all I'm saying.

 

I do like kathyk24's above mentioned idea, though. The problem is, no one knows anymore how to make the movies John Candy made (which were goofy and silly without being shrill, stupid, and mean-spirited).

 

This reminds me... when I watched the trailer for The Boss, I felt like demanding an apology from anyone who ever judged me for liking 1939's The Women. Yes, The Women should not be held as a standard for modern (or even classic) feminism, but you know what? The Women is witty and quotable (whereas I can't remember a single line from The Boss trailer that made me laugh), and even the "straight man" characters are allowed to be half-way amusing and memorable (poor Kristen Bell could have been replaced by an end table and you'd never know the difference). Not to mention no one in The Women grossly fondled each other's boobs...

Edited by Wiendish Fitch
Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...