Jump to content

Type keyword(s) to search

Unpopular Opinions


  • Reply
  • Start Topic

Recommended Posts

(edited)
2 hours ago, Ohiopirate02 said:

They are also predictable and relatively uncomplicated. Which is not a knock on the genre. I am a proud reader of romance novels, and romance is the backbone of the publishing industry because it is also predictable and relatively uncomplicated. 

My point is genres other than superheroes should be predictable and uncomplicated if they want to attract audiences. That's how it used to be. The directors and actors of today that are actually talented don't want to now because they want to be "edgy" and "challenging". 

Edited by Fool to cry
  • Like 1
  • Applause 2
Quote

So do I, though I wanted to throttle Tea Leoni’s character.

They had to make her as wretched as possible to prop up Paz Vega's character.

Quote

My point is genres other than superheroes should be predictable and uncomplicated if they want to attract audiences. That's how it used to be. The directors and actors of today that are actually talented don't want to now because they want to be "edgy" and "challenging". 

I don't know, sometimes taking a risk works, and has many times in the past.

  • Like 2

I'm tired of Margot Robbie being cast in practically everything.  I don't think she's that great an actress, although in certain narrow niches she's okay.  I really do not see her as Catherine Earnshaw in Wuthering Heights.  If she brings that hard quality of hers to the role, it could work, I guess, but there are so many other actress who'd be more suited.

  • Like 1
  • Applause 3
16 hours ago, Spartan Girl said:

There’s no way Jacob Elordi can play Heathcliff. At least cast a POC in the role since the book implied he was such! 

Eh, the book leaves room for the possibility but it's hardly canon.  I see nothing wrong with casting Elordi although I probably would've gone with someone more Mediterranean looking. 

On 9/26/2024 at 12:36 PM, proserpina65 said:

Eh, the book leaves room for the possibility but it's hardly canon.  I see nothing wrong with casting Elordi although I probably would've gone with someone more Mediterranean looking. 

Wanted to add that had Ms. Fennell gone in that direction, I wouldn't have objected as long as I thought the actor could handle to role.  (Not sure if I think Elordi can but for me he's less of an issue in that respect than Robbie.)

I'm just hoping she gets that Wuthering Heights isn't really a romance but is instead about two obsessed, narcissistic people who destroy everyone around them.

  • Like 2
  • Applause 1
19 hours ago, proserpina65 said:

Wanted to add that had Ms. Fennell gone in that direction, I wouldn't have objected as long as I thought the actor could handle to role.  (Not sure if I think Elordi can but for me he's less of an issue in that respect than Robbie.)

I'm just hoping she gets that Wuthering Heights isn't really a romance but is instead about two obsessed, narcissistic people who destroy everyone around them.

I mean I got that from the MTV version from the early 2000s starring Katherine Heigl set in the modern day! I was like "Wow, these people are awful!"

  • Like 2
1 hour ago, Fool to cry said:

I mean I got that from the MTV version from the early 2000s starring Katherine Heigl set in the modern day! I was like "Wow, these people are awful!"

They really are terrible but some people still seem to think Wuthering Heights is some great romance.  I mean, sure, I thought so after watching the movie with Merle Oberon and Laurence Olivier, but then I read the book.

Sounds like the people who made the MTV movie understood it.

  • Like 1
3 hours ago, proserpina65 said:

They really are terrible but some people still seem to think Wuthering Heights is some great romance.  I mean, sure, I thought so after watching the movie with Merle Oberon and Laurence Olivier, but then I read the book.

After watching both Promising Young Woman and Saltburn, I don't think we are getting yet another Wuthering Heights adaptation that glorifies abusive relationships because a broody Heathcliffe is hot. I feel like we are going to get a rather faithful adaptation of the book. I also think after watching Saltburn that necrophilia is on the table. 

  • Like 1
6 hours ago, proserpina65 said:

They really are terrible but some people still seem to think Wuthering Heights is some great romance.  I mean, sure, I thought so after watching the movie with Merle Oberon and Laurence Olivier, but then I read the book.

Sounds like the people who made the MTV movie understood it.

Which I never understood. It's very clear in the book it's not a great romance. Cathy and Heathcliff are both terrible people.

  • Like 4
22 hours ago, Ohiopirate02 said:

After watching both Promising Young Woman and Saltburn, I don't think we are getting yet another Wuthering Heights adaptation that glorifies abusive relationships because a broody Heathcliffe is hot. I feel like we are going to get a rather faithful adaptation of the book. I also think after watching Saltburn that necrophilia is on the table. 

I've never seen Promising Young Woman but Saltburn did not give me confidence in Emerald Fennell's ability as director.

21 hours ago, DoctorAtomic said:

I'll never forget Wuthering Heights because our senior year english teacher was totally fangirling (before the word was invented) over Timothy Dalton's thighs. She wasn't even trying to hide it. 

I totally get that, because Timothy Dalton = yum.  Some people can move past that to understand the source material but unfortunately a lot of people can't.

1 hour ago, proserpina65 said:

I've never seen Promising Young Woman but Saltburn did not give me confidence in Emerald Fennell's ability as director.

 

I find Promising Young Woman to be a stronger film than Saltburn. It's less self-indulgent and the story is less muddled. I think Emerald can successfully adapt WH if she sticks close to the source material and does not add in any extra class critique that only Brits of a certain income level can understand. 

  • Like 2
16 hours ago, Ohiopirate02 said:

I find Promising Young Woman to be a stronger film than Saltburn. It's less self-indulgent and the story is less muddled. I think Emerald can successfully adapt WH if she sticks close to the source material and does not add in any extra class critique that only Brits of a certain income level can understand. 

I really liked Promising Young Woman. Women like Madison and the Dean not caring what happened to Nina until they were placed in the same position. Which is sadly very realistic. As depressing as it is Cassie never recovering. It felt realistic too. Somethings you don't recover from. And of course the men getting arrested in the end. Also, was really interesting that the only one who actually felt bad about what happened was the defense lawyer. 

  • Like 2
(edited)
On 9/30/2024 at 3:50 PM, proserpina65 said:

I'm just hoping she gets that Wuthering Heights isn't really a romance but is instead about two obsessed, narcissistic people who destroy everyone around them.

THANK YOU. It's unsettling how many people miss this. 

Jacob Elordi as Heathcliff? Eh, maybe it could work. Heathcliff was a violent asshole, and if the allegations against Elordi are to be believed...

Sorry, that's not fair, I'm just engaging in hollow snark. My UO is... do we really need another Wuthering Heights adaptation? 

Edited by Wiendish Fitch
  • Like 3

Do we really need another adaptation of any previously well received version?

I get it's easier and safer for studios to remake something that is a recognized and well liked IP, but I'd rather see them remake a previous movie that had potential but still flopped (ie, if you're going to remake an Audrey Hepburn movie, as an example, don't do Charade or Sabrina, maybe do Paris When It Sizzles instead).

  • Like 2
  • Love 2
43 minutes ago, Palimelon said:

Do we really need another adaptation of any previously well received version?

I get it's easier and safer for studios to remake something that is a recognized and well liked IP, but I'd rather see them remake a previous movie that had potential but still flopped (ie, if you're going to remake an Audrey Hepburn movie, as an example, don't do Charade or Sabrina, maybe do Paris When It Sizzles instead).

That would be interesting. There's a lot of movies that had potential it would be fun to see if they could redo those and make them better.

  • Like 2
(edited)
9 minutes ago, proserpina65 said:

The Middlemarch adaptation had the young and extremely lovely Rufus Sewell in it.  I'm familiar with at least 3 Gaskell adaptations, Wives and Daughters, North and South, and Cranford.  Not sure they were all by the BBC, though.

Oh, I saw that years ago and didn't really know Rufus Sewell then. I will have to look it up for re-viewing.  I love the book Middlemarch.

I'm using BBC loosely--I just mean they're from the British Industrial Complex of series productions that get shown on PBS. 

Edited by EtheltoTillie
  • Love 1

I didn't enjoy Starship Troopers, but apparently it was popular enough to warrant a reunion 27 years later. I have to say, though, the cast has aged really well...

Starship Troopers full cast reunion panel at NYCC 2024
Popverse   posted Nov 15, 2024

Quote

"This is for all you new people. I have only one rule." Enjoy this Starship Troopers reunion panel! Watch as Casper Van Dien (Juan Rico), Dina Meyer (Dizzy Flores), Denise Richards (Captain Carmen Ibanez), Seth Gilliam (Sugar Watkins), and Michael Ironside (Jean Rasczak) get back together on stage at New York Comic Con 2024 to talk about the beloved cult classic science fiction film.

  • Like 1
  • Useful 1
1 hour ago, tv echo said:

I didn't enjoy Starship Troopers, but apparently it was popular enough to warrant a reunion 27 years later. I have to say, though, the cast has aged really well...

Starship Troopers full cast reunion panel at NYCC 2024
Popverse   posted Nov 15, 2024

If you want a somewhat faithful adaptation of the book, go watch Aliens. If you want to see Verhoeven make fun of nazis, watch Starship Troopers. No, I've never seen the TV series, sequel, or games.

  • Like 2
  • Useful 2
22 hours ago, Anduin said:

If you want a somewhat faithful adaptation of the book, go watch Aliens. If you want to see Verhoeven make fun of nazis, watch Starship Troopers. No, I've never seen the TV series, sequel, or games.

The animated Roughnecks: Starship Troopers Chronicles was the show many of the mil/SF fans were looking for. You had the mobile infantry and not the over the top pre WWI mob rushing towards the enemy.  Even if Verhoeven had executive producer credits in that case it was just a cash grab from the Heinlein estate as he probably had no way to stop the series. Being "for kids" his politics were stripped out

  • Useful 1
1 hour ago, Raja said:

The animated Roughnecks: Starship Troopers Chronicles was the show many of the mil/SF fans were looking for. You had the mobile infantry and not the over the top pre WWI mob rushing towards the enemy.  Even if Verhoeven had executive producer credits in that case it was just a cash grab from the Heinlein estate as he probably had no way to stop the series. Being "for kids" his politics were stripped out

Interesting! Might be worth a watch. I like the satire we got, but there's certainly room for multiple interpretations.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...