Jump to content

Type keyword(s) to search

MLB Thread


smittykins
  • Reply
  • Start Topic

Recommended Posts

Griffey got 99.3% so now I'm wondering if Mo or Jeter will get 100%, or when it's their turn some of the voters will be like "eh they're going to get in anyways, I'll throw my vote somewhere else."

Piazza is in too.

  • Love 1
Link to comment

I still think Greg Maddux should have received the highest voting percentage ever but I'm biased!  Very cool for Junior instead.

 

I just don't get Piazza.  Great guy, helluva player on offense but in my opinion he didn't call good games.

Link to comment

I still think Greg Maddux should have received the highest voting percentage ever but I'm biased!  Very cool for Junior instead.

 

I just don't get Piazza.  Great guy, helluva player on offense but in my opinion he didn't call good games.

I thought it would be Maddux, because of the type of pitcher he was in the era he played. But I have no beef with Junior breaking the record.

Piazza is interesting, he might be the one to break the logjam of the Steroid Era.

Link to comment

Finally! I figure Griffey got more votes than Seaver because he hit all those homers without tripping any alarms. I don't believe Piazza took steroids, though that might be because I'm a Mets fan.

Link to comment

Mike Piazza. As a long time Met hater, I actually became a former hater when they got him. I always liked him as a Dodger (no Dodger love on my part) and at the time Piazza got traded to SD/Florida there were a lot of beleaguered Mets fans who were calling the sports radio station and ranting about how the Mets management sucked because they never, ever tried to improve the club. How they should have been the ones to get Mike and yadda yadda. This went on for days.

 

Then one day out of the blue Pizza man comes to the Mets, of all clubs!  I have to say that I was shocked and impressed at the same time. This huge star was coming to NY! I was actually smiling. I found myself anticipating the new season to see how this was all going to play out.

 

His rep was that of a not so great catcher. He couldn't throw guys out, didn't call a great game, etc. Well maybe that's true but if he sucked so badly why wasn't he traded to an AL team to DH? He was no Johnny Bench but he wasn't a slouch.

 

So kudos to him. I was very happy to hear he got in.

 

Junior? I was never a fan of his. I hated Seattle and he always came off like a jerk to me because he said he didn't want to ever be a Yankee because Billy Martin never let him play in the clubhouse when his dad was on the team. Seriously? Maybe it's true, maybe it's an urban legend. All I know is that it rubbed me the wrong way and I never warmed up to the guy. Besides, Billy was dead so who gives a shit.

 

That being said I would be an idiot if I said he didn't belong. Unanimously. Those 3 or so writers should be ashamed of themselves. He did hit some monumental HR's and he never really seemed like he was in the game for the big bucks.(well, yeah he was but you could see he loved to play.) And some of those catches were unbelievable! Mariner fans are in heaven, I would guess. They should be. He was an all time great.

 

Good job by the BBWA. Really want to see Tim Raines in next year. Seriously, if Tom Seaver and Griffey Jr couldn't get unanimous votes it makes you wonder what will go down with Jeter and Mariano. I can see how some would say that Jeter didn't have the best range and I can see him getting Junior percentages but can anybody really not vote Mariano in with 100%? Mariano would probably not even care about the percentage because that's the kind of guy he is but he deserves it.

Edited by prican58
Link to comment

I could see enough Sabermetrics types who wouldn't vote for Jeter to keep his vote in the 95 % range, maybe 96-97. Still very high, but I don't think he'll threaten Griffey's record. Rivera might be another story.

 

Still, at the end of the day, whatever anger I may have towards the vote isn't going to be directed by those who didn't vote for Griffey on a stacked ballot, but rather those who did vote for the likes of David Eckstein (3 votes), Mike Sweeney (8 votes), Jason Kendall (2 votes) and Garrett Anderson (1 vote). The people who made those 14 votes, those are the ones who have a lot more explaining to do in my mind. 

Link to comment

Is it possible to find out who didn't vote for him (it's just 3 people) so we can hunt them down and flog them with a wet noodle?

 

Eh. The plaque is just as bronze at 99.3% as it would be at 100%.

  • Love 4
Link to comment

Congratulations to both Griffey and Piazza!  That's a great pair to induct into the Hall of Fame.

 

Piazza should have gotten in on the first try.  I think he should go in as a Marlin though. ;)

 

The whole "no unanimous" bullshit pisses me off.  Just because writers were stupid enough not to vote previous players unanimously (these are the same "geniuses" who didn't vote Joe DiMaggio into the Hall on his first year of eligibility and I think his second year too) isn't a reason not to vote players who deserve it unanimously in the future.  The three voters who didn't cast their ballot for Griffey should lose their voting privileges permanently. 

Edited by benteen
Link to comment

My sister has a phobia of bobbleheads; your collection would driver her into breakdown, xaxat!  

 

Hm... I might forward her the pic. Because if you can't torment your siblings, then what are they good for?!

  • Love 2
Link to comment

I only have a few bobbleheads but when we had the earthquake in NJ (I want to say 2011) my Ryan Howard one fell off my bookshelf and he was decapitated. My sister reattached his head but he doesn't have the same bobble anymore.

Edited by shoregirl
  • Love 1
Link to comment

Heard something about how Ken Griffey might go into the Hall with a backwards cap. Out of curiosity, has anybody been enshrined as a Mariner? I'm thinking Randy Johnson, but I might be wrong. And I also heard Mike Piazza wants to go in as a Met. Natch, I support this, but were bridges burned that severely with the Dodgers?

Link to comment

Heard something about how Ken Griffey might go into the Hall with a backwards cap. Out of curiosity, has anybody been enshrined as a Mariner? I'm thinking Randy Johnson, but I might be wrong. And I also heard Mike Piazza wants to go in as a Met. Natch, I support this, but were bridges burned that severely with the Dodgers?

 

According to Wikipedia, Griffey will be the first Mariner:

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_members_of_the_Baseball_Hall_of_Fame

 

Johnson went in as a Diamondback.

Link to comment

Imagine what would happen if there was an earthquake in the Virginia/ DC area, where ebk works.  So many bobbles over your desk!  Death by bobble-head!

There actually WAS an earthquake here in 2011 (the one that damaged the Washington Monument and Cathedral).  Unfortunately (or not!), I was in Italy visiting my brother.  So I missed it.  To this day I can't forgive my boss for not taking a picture of the shelves before he ran out of the building in abject terror  :-)

 

 

My collection has grown quite a bit since April (a friend sent me a Roll Tide! 'head just today).  I'll try to remember to take a new picture for your amusement.  Or for my amusement.

  • Love 3
Link to comment

[...]but I don't think he'll threaten Griffey's record. Rivera might be another story.

I dunno.  I heard a lot, a lot of anti-relief pitcher-talk during the lead-up to the announcement.  I think he'll be a first-ballot, but not unanimous.

 

p.s. Still breaking out in tears, and dance moves, on Day 2 of Alex Gordon is back.  Also receiving crow-eating tweets from local sportstalk guys & writers who said this would never happen.

Link to comment

Johnson went in as a Diamondback.

 

I recently read where after that choice Johnson was so worried that offended the good people of Seattle that he made a public apology to them.  Something about that struck me as sweet, a word rarely used to describe Randy Johnson.

  • Love 2
Link to comment

The Nationals traded Drew Storen and cash to the Toronto Blue Jays for Ben Revere and a PTBNL

 

 

 

Now who am I gonna be able to cuss out when the Nats lose in a close game in the late innings?.

Edited by jennifer6973
Link to comment

The Nationals traded Drew Storen and cash to the Toronto Blue Jays for Ben Revere and a PTBNL

 

 

 

Now who am I gonna be able to cuss out when the Nats lose in a close game in the late innings?.

 

The current closer?  He seems eminently cuss-able... :-)

Link to comment

The Nationals traded Drew Storen and cash to the Toronto Blue Jays for Ben Revere and a PTBNL

Now who am I gonna be able to cuss out when the Nats lose in a close game in the late innings?.

Papelbon seems cuss worthy.

All jokes aside, I'm somewhat glad to see Storen go. He has contributed to the suckiness that has been the Nationals bullpen over the last few years. I don't care who the closer is; I just want someone who can consistently close the game without giving up five runs in the process and I'd like to get a good night's sleep in the process (minimal extra innings).

Link to comment

Oh, this tweet/ article will go over FANTASTIC in this thread.

 

Mo: There's 'more momentum' for DH in NL

 

During an expansive question-and-answer session with the fans, general manager John Mozeliak fielded some pointed questions about free agents and trades, and one question he has faced in almost every year he's appeared at the Warm-up.

This year, his answer has changed.

 

Mozeliak said there is "more momentum" than in years past to bring the designated hitter into the National League. He said this mentioning conversations he's had with other general managers and owners. When asked to elaborate on the comments made to fans, Mozeliak described how the topic of the DH in the NL used to be a "non-starter" with officials, but now it's become more of a topic.

Moving the DH into the NL by the start of the 2017 season -- when, presumably, a new CBA would be in place -- would be quick, the Cardinals general manager said.

It has been discussed using a DH for all interleague games.

 

Link to comment

Moving the DH into the NL by the start of the 2017 season -- when, presumably, a new CBA would be in place -- would be quick, the Cardinals general manager said.

It has been discussed using a DH for all interleague games.

 

Would it really be that easy? I'm not sure NL owners would be willing to pay fifteen new starters without asking for a lot in return in CBA negotiations.

  • Love 1
Link to comment

Madison Bumgarner is on my favorite team, so I'm going to say no to the DH. I know he's an exception to the rule, but he's proof that if a pitcher takes his hitting seriously and has pride in his results, he can contribute at the plate. I wish more pitchers followed his lead. 

  • Love 5
Link to comment

If the DH had always been in existence, would anyone have noticed Babe Ruth as anything but a great pitcher?

The baseball rules define baseball as a game played by nine players on each team. I don't know what the AL is playing, but it isn't baseball.

  • Love 6
Link to comment

Even the 76-year-old Bartolo Colon had some entertaining at-bats this year, and even got a few big hits.

 

 

Hey now Bartolo is my age.  :-P

If the DH had always been in existence, would anyone have noticed Babe Ruth as anything but a great pitcher?

The baseball rules define baseball as a game played by nine players on each team. I don't know what the AL is playing, but it isn't baseball.

 

Someone on MLB Network said it was the difference between checkers and Chess.  

 

So the AL is checkers  and the NL is chess.  (aka the smarter game)

  • Love 2
Link to comment

So the AL is checkers  and the NL is chess.  (aka the smarter game)

Oh that's Bullshit. And, the game and how it's evolved is *nothing* like it was when Ruth played, so I don't want to hear that crap either.

 

Okay NL people, you want the game it was originally played? With no specialized bullpen, bench, etc? Fine, lets do that, because that's what has happened. The 7th inning guy, the 8th inning guy, the "closer" - bullpen guys who can't handle coming in with men on base, etc. The game is specialized, more than ever, and most pitchers are CLUELESS at the plate, which is not smart, and "Not Smart" in baseball leads to Injuries. 

 

Will I miss double-switches? Sure. But I HATE how many injuries there are each year because I like to see teams do their best.  Having pitchers hit?  That is not baseball at its best.

 

Bumgarner, and Grienke, and Matz and whoever else you want to pull out?  They are good athletes, and outliers.  And I can easily say JON LESTER for counter-balance. 4 for 62 last year. K'd 30 times - half the time he bats, so he's not even squaring up on the ball. 4 for 98 in his career so far.

 

Baseball pitchers make the majors by being pitchers. Not hitters. No one makes it because of a bat- that isn't even on the radar. Pitch well, throw strikes, fielding. 

 

All these lines are from the same Grantland article:  (boy, I'm gonna miss grantland during this coming season...)

 

Seven of the 10 worst offensive seasons for pitchers since 1973 have come in the past decade.

 

So, how did we get here? In an analytically driven sport constantly striving for excellence, how did we reach a point where everyone now accepts total incompetence in one out of every nine times at bat?

 

“Specialization,” says Pirates GM Neal Huntington. “As early as high school, more pitchers are only pitching, so their bat never develops. Even guys that pitch and play a position tend to be more focused on pitching, as that is more than likely their best path to professional baseball."

 

----

Then there’s the question of how best to use a pitcher’s time. Tommy John surgery has become such an epidemic for young arms that teams are now hyper-focused on keeping pitchers healthy and getting them to the big leagues before the injury monster attacks, rather than even feigning interest in teaching them how to hit. Once they get to the big leagues, they encounter a landscape in which starters are pulled from games earlier than at any other point in MLB history, which further disincentivizes batting instruction.

  • Love 5
Link to comment

Oh that's Bullshit. And, the game and how it's evolved is *nothing* like it was when Ruth played, so I don't want to hear that crap either.

 

 

So much this.

 

The DH has been around since 1973. I've NEVER seen baseball without it, and I think most of us on this board fall into the same camp.

 

There's absolutely way less strategy in NL. You either hit for the pitcher or you take the out.

(boy, I'm gonna miss grantland during this coming season...)

 

 

Me, too. Trying my best to find where Jonah, Ben, Baumann have gone. I think Jonah went to SI.com, but don't really know. :(

Edited by cherrypj
Link to comment

MLB and the absolute bullshit blackout rules continue, even AFTER they "lose" the Garber lawsuit...

 

More details here. And this does NOT solve the Baltimore/ Washington issue, and still screws Iowa/ Vegas/ Hawaii.
 

First, the official settlement does place some restrictions on MLB’s ability to raise the price of both its single-team and league-wide MLB.TV packages in the future. Specifically, after setting the price of these service options at $84.99 and $109.99, respectively, for 2016, the agreement specifies that the league may only raise the price of these packages by no more than 3%, or that year’s inflation rate, whichever is greater.

So barring a major spike in inflation, MLB will only be able to raise the price of its MLB.TV packages by a few bucks per year until the settlement agreement expires following the 2020 season.

 

Second, the settlement also includes provisions covering the MLB Extra Innings cable/satellite service. In particular, MLB has agreed to give cable and satellite providers the option to sell single-team Extra Innings packages, should they wish to do so. While these providers aren’t obligated to offer a single-team service under the terms of the settlement, if they do elect to do so then they must offer packages for all 30 teams, and not just the league’s most popular clubs.

 

Third, although not directly eliminating MLB’s blackout policy, the settlement does try to provide some relief to what it terms “Unserved Fans.” Specifically, anyone who is completely unable to receive cable or satellite television service at their home will now be able to petition MLB for the ability to stream in-market games via MLB.TV.

 

To be clear, this provision is pretty limited. It only covers those who can’t subscribe to cable at all, and does not apply to those fans who are simply unable to subscribe to a particular RSN via their local cable provider. So this new option won’t help fans in Iowa or Las Vegas who often find themselves blacked out from as many as five or six games per night.

 

Unfortunately, while all of these apparent provisions in the settlement agreement are great for fans who currently subscribe to MLB.TV or a Comcast- or DirecTV-owned RSN, they will do little for fans who are presently unable to watch their favorite team play due to MLB’s blackout rules. Indeed, by all accounts it appears that Tuesday’s deal leaves the league’s existing local broadcast territories in place, meaning that the blackout policy will be unaffected by the settlement.
Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...