Jump to content

Type keyword(s) to search

Sweet Fellowship: Duggars and Friends (aka the Bates Family and Other Featured Families Thread)


Message added by Scarlett45

If a person/family was never featured on any of the Duggar shows, and is not related to the Duggar family by blood or marriage, they do not need to be discussed here..

We may all agree that David Rodriques is quite unfortunate looking, but let's refrain from comparing human beings to apes, its got way too much of a loaded history- please review the new Inclusion Policy updated May 1, 2022 , which details guidelines around discussing body type, capabilities, physical appearance etc. Additionally, using body size as an insult is not allowed.

 

  • Reply
  • Start Topic

Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, EmeraldGirl said:

Why can’t she try and help bulk them up (ha ha, just thought about SNL and pump you up) if she is so worried about them looking like “whimps”? Do they have any weight sets?

A weight set has been shown in the boys room.  No bench, just a bar and weights on the floor. They also have a chin up bar. Jonathan has also been shown having a chin up bar.

Manly biceps seem the focus. Arm wrestling seems the only competitive activity they engage in.  

From the pics of arm wrestling at Olivia's birthday it looked like Sam U El has built some sort of table specifically for the manly arm wrestling.

  • LOL 3
2 hours ago, AstridM said:

“Anyway” is still correct! ❤️ This error drives me crazy, too. Also, seeing “bias” instead of “biased.” How the hell did that become a common error?

Or deep “seeded.” 🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️

Yup...those (and a bunch of others I can't recall off the top of my head) basically come from people not reading much. Frankly, in quite a number of cases (such as "deep seeded", the pronunciation is pretty much identical, and the meaning of each phrase also more or less works whichever word is used. So unless someone writes it down, there's no way to know how "literate" they are, and the spelling could actually transition completely without much of the population even being aware of it. I know there are a couple of idioms out there which, given that the original wording was rather archaic, did sort of make better sense with updated language. Of course, I can't recall those either, but I know I've seen some lists, and been quite fascinated by the evolution.

  • Like 1
Message added by Scarlett45

If a person/family was never featured on any of the Duggar shows, and is not related to the Duggar family by blood or marriage, they do not need to be discussed here..

We may all agree that David Rodriques is quite unfortunate looking, but let's refrain from comparing human beings to apes, its got way too much of a loaded history- please review the new Inclusion Policy updated May 1, 2022 , which details guidelines around discussing body type, capabilities, physical appearance etc. Additionally, using body size as an insult is not allowed.

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...