Jump to content

Type keyword(s) to search

  • Reply
  • Start Topic

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, nexxie said:

What’s with celebrities keeping new babies’ faces hidden when they gladly post pics of their older kids? Didn’t Kylie post pics of Stormi as a newborn? But no pics of Baby No-Name Webster.

https://www.instyle.com/celebrity/kylie-jenner/kylie-jenner-mothers-day-stormi-photos-instagram

Whatever the reason, it’s a positive thing when they choose not to exploit a child. 

  • Love 1
(edited)

I think a lot of celebrities show their children as infants because let’s be honest most newborns look the same and are indistinguishable.  Also sometimes once the paps get that first pic and it’s out there they are not so bloodthirsty.  As the kids get older they become more  recognizable and the parents want to shield them from being followed by paps, etc. so they block their faces.

Edited by mostlylurking
  • Love 4
1 hour ago, mostlylurking said:

I think a lot of celebrities show their children as infants because let’s be honest most newborns look the same and are indistinguishable.  Also sometimes once the paps get that first pic and it’s out there they are not so bloodthirsty.  As the kids get older they become more  recognizable and the parents want to shield them from being followed by paps, etc. so they block their faces.

Very good points. Same reason the Royals let the public and paps get pictures after a birth. Hopefully that satiates their curiosity for a while and gives the families some privacy.

  • Love 1
18 hours ago, mostlylurking said:

I think a lot of celebrities show their children as infants because let’s be honest most newborns look the same and are indistinguishable.  Also sometimes once the paps get that first pic and it’s out there they are not so bloodthirsty.  As the kids get older they become more  recognizable and the parents want to shield them from being followed by paps, etc. so they block their faces.

Exactly plus California passed a law if you recall that the paps in LA can not sell/publish pictures of celebrity children. Also while some celebs keep their kids off social media the Kardashian family is very popular so they are taking the bounty off of their children. 

34 minutes ago, carolinagirl81 said:

Travis "comeback redemption arc" is continuing, he will be preforming at the Billboard Music Awards. I wonder what song he will be performing or if he will be performing with another artist because I am unaware of any new single/song that he has out right now.

Travis and more to preform at the 2022 Billboard Music Awards

🤮🤮🤮 Shame on the Billboard Music Awards for allowing this.

32 minutes ago, carolinagirl81 said:

Exactly plus California passed a law if you recall that the paps in LA can not sell/publish pictures of celebrity children. Also while some celebs keep their kids off social media the Kardashian family is very popular so they are taking the bounty off of their children. 

They’re no more popular than actual A-list celebrities with talent. But the Ks would have nothing if they didn’t continue to exploit their very small kids, in addition to fame whoring themselves.

  • Love 1
52 minutes ago, Cinnabon said:

They’re no more popular than actual A-list celebrities with talent. But the Ks would have nothing if they didn’t continue to exploit their very small kids, in addition to fame whoring themselves

*Kanye Shrug* Perhaps but even without the kid's IMO the family would still have the press and folks in general watching and waiting for what they do next. 

1 hour ago, carolinagirl81 said:

*Kanye Shrug* Perhaps but even without the kid's IMO the family would still have the press and folks in general watching and waiting for what they do next. 

That makes them even worse to me then. If they can continue to get the attention they so need without exploiting the kids, then they should be doing that. Most people I know in real life are disgusted that “news” about them still pops up all the damn time. 🤷‍♀️

  • Love 2
20 hours ago, Cinnabon said:

That makes them even worse to me then. If they can continue to get the attention they so need without exploiting the kids, then they should be doing that.

I rather they get attention by going away & staying away. Sadly, Mick Jaggar & The Rolling Stones said it best,"You can't always get what you want."

 

20 hours ago, Cinnabon said:

Most people I know in real life are disgusted that “news” about them still pops up all the damn time. 🤷‍♀️

That would definitely be me. It makes me sick that raw sewage & toxic waste like the Daily Mail, E Network, Access Hollywood, ET, those Social Media sites, & others of their ilk thinks Kylie, that stupid family, and their constant bragging & stupidity is newsworthy. I wish that the Daily Mail & others of their filth would go away & stay away. If I want to kill my brain cells & my self-respect, I'll read the Daily Mail on a daily basis.

 

  • Useful 1

Sitting her in class this morning nonfunctional on this Wednesday which honestly is normal for me. Anywho I am watching international news via YouTube and I learned of the tragedy in Berlin.

Some fool either intentionally or not drove their car into a crowd injuring 30 and killing one person. However I noticed something on the store window that the car crashed into... a Kylie Skin Ad.

A_P.thumb.jpeg.88a1a915665b27f1172262d66f80121c.jpeg

AP22159358583183.thumb.jpg.481f57085de82c2dc2428b488ecc420f.jpg

  • Mind Blown 1

Saw an article about “Kylie, Travis, Stormi and Baby Boy.”

Really?! 

What is the point of keeping this child and his name under wraps when Stormi is out there all over the place? Is it because people embraced Stormi, but might reject little Jacky (as Grandma calls him) after Travis’ show tragedy?

Are they actually calling him Jacky - as the “I spy with my little eye” photo Kylie posted might hint, since there was a hidden jackrabbit in the shot?

Or is his name Jacob - as Stormi’s Father’s Day drawing seems to say?

So weird to share Stormi with the public, pretty much from the beginning, but keep their little boy hidden away - but then, people really are cruel assholes on the internet.

In any case, I’m always curious about naming, so what’s the little guy’s name already?! 

  • Like 3
  • Love 1
1 hour ago, nkotb said:

This kid’s almost 6 months old, though. God help me, but I can’t help but wonder if there’s something on him that isn’t quite perfect, or, up to-KarJenner-standards, so they’re “fixing” it before going public. Specifically referring to why Kylie stickered his face on her Father’s Day post. I’ll be happy if I’m wrong.

That has some fruit to it but maybe she's going the route of other well known people and keeping their young kids off social media, because didn't she get some heat about Stormi.

That one Jonas brother who had a baby via surrogate, hasn't shown the baby's face just body shots.

Also as someone else said there is still the AstroWorld tragedy so she is careful about what she posts of the kid's.

  • Love 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...