Gwen-Stacys

She's a Mikaelson (and a Marshall). Potentially sacrificing a friend as a means of reuniting with family is something both her parents would and have done in the past. Also, literally putting family members and coffins and using them as leverage. As for Henry...Hope didn't get Henry walled up. Henry got Henry walled up by killing a vampire. And the only people absolving Hope of anything are her family members (Marcel/Freya, etc) or Vincent (who I think feels responsible for her lashing out seeing as he's the one that both turned Marcel into an unkillable beast that kept her father captive for five years of her life and also released the Hallow....which kept her separate from her father for another 7 years). Everyone else rightly sees her as a current/future threat. They just don't have the power to make a move against her when she's protected as much as she is. Not to mention, offing her would mean almost certain death for you and anyone you ever even remotely cared for. I might be in the minority, but I actually like duplicitous Hope. I'm tired of female protagonists being put on a morally righteous pedastool or not paying for bad deeds they've done. Hope did a bad thing and she (inarguably) paid highly for it. She got her mother both kidnapped and very hurt.

I agree that kicking animals is not funny, but that whole scene brought up a major issue I have with some people w/reply to their pets (and I say this as a dog owner and as someone that is nervous around cats). Not everyone likes animals. Some people are actually afraid of them. Get control of your animal and don't let them jump all over people. A fearful reaction is sometimes a violent one, so I understood that. Dre should've brought up them constantly forgetting about Devonte as a reason for not getting a dog. That would have been a major trump card in that argument!

"Her role in the upcoming season is more likely to be a continuation of what she was doing in Season 7, managing the food stores and such." People keep saying this, with reply to Sansa. But...I'd like to point out that book Sansa is NOT good at keeping house at all. Arya even jokes that Sansa's future husband better find himself a damned good Steward, bc Sansa is HORIBAD. I think this is a case of people drinking the show!Sansa koolaid without taking into account that no matter the show vs book differences, they're going to end in a relatively similar place. I honestly don't see book!Sansa ever making it back to Winterfell, which makes me think that wherever show Sansa ends up, it won't be in Winterfell. Littlefinger is surprised that the Northern Lords didn't back Sansa over Jon at the end of season 6, but anyone that understands the North would've seen that outcome coming a mile away. It has been explicitly stated numerous times in both book and on show that the North runs differently than the south. And a Southerner (littlefinger through proxy Sansa) could never hold it. There has to be a reason for that re: ASOIAF endgame.

I was being facetious. I also agree that he's more important to the story than the show suggests. He's one of GRRM's 5 mains (along with Arya, Tyrion, Dany, and Jon). I think he'll warg into Viserion during a key point in a battle and will be instrumental in taking him down. Yea, sure. But speculation has to come from somewhere. Dany balked at eating horses, I doubt she'd be the one to foray into the world of cannibalism.

You're argument falls apart here, because she initially flew north before she got her ceasefire. She lost a dragon for it. A literal child to her. You accused Dany of future cannibalism. You don't like her, that's fine, but can we keep the discussion on brand for each character? We lose the discussion bit if we don't. She burned the wagons because they were lined up behind the soldiers. They boxed them in (Dothraki through the front, dragon fire at the back). Yes, she burned the food, but I think they marked it down as a loss anyway. Either Cersei got it, or they destroyed it in a grande show of power. That is what the field of fire (1.0 and 2.0) were for ---to show off the destructive power of dragons. That, and she got retribution for her fallen allies. One, in particular, that encouraged her to do just what she did.

I agree, we shouldn't be comparing Dany to Sansa. Never should. They're two different characters, with two different journeys, with different goals in mind. One of my biggest pet peeves is people glorifying one female character while pooping on another. You can like one without it being at the expense of another. Plenty of room for females to coexist in a narrative without being at odds with each other. Chances are, Dany and Sansa will never be too much at odds with each other in book (I'm also with the faction that believes the books are going to have a quasi Stark bowl, with the Maderleys/Rickon vs Jon/Widlings/Some Nothern Houses/(Arya/Bran) vs The Vale/Littlefinger/Sansa. It'll end with the Starks being united, Jon crowned king in the North, etc etc all to be resolved by the time Dany gets there) or on show. There will be awkwardness, but Dany's always been a girl's girl (she's a Margaery Tyrell-esque female, although less flirty and more brutal), Sansa will probably end up liking her. Same as Arya. @the Superman part....Lois Lane (a human) is deemed better than Kal El by some, because even without powers she's pretty formidable (and able to handle herself physically as well) Dany started on this journey for Westeros in book 1 when the man sitting on her father's throne sent countless assassins after her and her brother. Two children that had not a cent to their name, and even had to resort to selling off the only memories they had of their mother to survive. If it wasn't for Illyrio (and a few scant others of his ilk, looking for the notoriety of housing refugee prince and princess until they grew tired and threw them back out on the streets), they probably would've been roaming the streets of Braavos still. Or dead. From Robert's assassins. Stepping into Dany's point of view (which is imperative to be able to properly critique both a character and their motivations), it's easy to see how she'd come to the conclusion that she needed to take Westeros back as a means of protection. How was she to know that the rulers to follow Robert wouldn't take up his vendetta against her? And even then, she abandoned her journey in order to free the slaves in the slaver cities and see to it that they stayed freed even after she left. She's not taking over Viserys legacy, she's taking her own. Dany never believed her brother capable of taking Westeros, nor did she believe he'd be a worthy ruler. And the rape of the Lhazereen could mean a lot of things. Some people theorize that that is meant to be current war ravaging Westeros and harming the people. Her trip through the house of the undying is part of what ramps up her desire for Westeros. She feels like she has to go there, not so much want. Dany wants to go back to the house with the red door and the lemon tree. Westeros isn't "home" for her. Dany has always been about the people, love her or hate her. And is she perfect? No! She's impulsive, quick tempered, vindictive, etc etc. Her hardness/arrogance came from the men in her life constantly doubting her and her abilities (see, her trade deal in Astapor where her advisers publicly disagreed with her; see also the leaders of the Second Sons). Same as Sansa's sneakiness and underhandedness came from a need to survive her surroundings, and initially, youthful ignorance. Initially, Sansa was supposed to die in King's Landing (and Initially initially, she didn't even exist, which means that she probably doesn't factor much into the endgame of the story as a whole. She'll probably the last big, heartbreaking death. Dying in place of her sister Arya, same way Lady died for Nymeria). I think the reason for her being in the Vale (where she hasn't grown into a ruler, but a manipulator ---in the books) was to include The Vale and the Riverlands in the larger story. She's not good at keeping house (the books explicitly state that anything to do with numbers and keeping track of stores, was more Arya's wheelhouse than hers. Another case of the show giving Sansa more credit/story/ability than she has in the books), so I don't see her being some great lady taking care of her own house. If Sansa doesn't die, she'll probably end up marrying as means of forging an alliance (with someone not named Snow/Targaryen) I think we can all agree that that story line was straight basura. Sure, Littlefinger wouldn't know that Arya never wanted to be a Lady, but Sansa did. And they never let on that the sister's were putting on a show for him either (who was there to see Arya quasi-threaten Sansa with a knife or them arguing on the bridge overlooking an empty courtyard? There wasn't even a cutaway to even hint at a spy. Dany didn't call herself azor ahai. She even points out that she's not a prince (and neither is Jon for that matter. Even legitimized, he is and was always a King) and not as a means to say that Mel was talking about her, but a means of asking why this prophecy would be important to her. Dany still cares about the people. It's why she doesn't just fly off to the red keep and burn it down like she considers in a moment of anger. It's also why she pauses her fight against Cersei to go North with Jon. Dany states her point of view quite plainly --- you can't protect people if you have zero power, you gotta do some unsavory things to get power. Dany wants to protect those under her because she never felt protected. She's in a unique position where she can (and does) empathize with the common people, and she has the means to help them. Something that Jon had to learn and Sansa still hasn't (that's not part of her narrative journey....right now). Arya has (never saw herself as above anyone to begin with) and Bran is a tree. As for the wagon burning, it was more keeping it from getting into the city/to Cersei. Their plan for lowest collateral damage was the lay siege to King's Landing and starve them out. Do something similar to what she did to the slave cities: let the people inside revolt and take the city for her. She didn't know that no ones else was coming to kill her. And who's to say that after the kings of Westeros were done fighting each other, they wouldn't turn their attention back to her? On top of that, someone did try to kill her after Robert died (the scorpion in the ball)

"See above. Tyrion wouldn't have had to come up with his crazy plan if Dany would have just let go of her primary objective for the moment, which was her war with Cersei. For watchers paying attention, wight hunt is a distraction, for Dany's benefit, and it is completely UNNECESSARY because Dany won't budge. So my point is that the conditions of her rescue are inherently less selfless because of this. They didn't have to write it this way. They could have had Jon go on wight hunt at Cersei's command, and had Dany go save him. Instead, it's a farce so that Dany can feel better about helping Jon in the larger scheme of things. It feels phony. Of course she didn't want him to go. But you know there are other options on the table that she could have taken when Tyrion proposed this? Such as "That's not necessary. I'll help you anyway" or perhaps "Why would we trust that Cersei would even agree to a truce?" She is letting herself be played. " Yea, for watchers it is a distraction. But Dany isn't a watcher. Some guy just told her to discard a goal she's spent the last few years gearing up for (starting when Robert's assassin tried to kill her and her unborn baby and she knew that her enemies would never stop coming after her, so she'd have to go after them) for something that sounds like a total fairytale. Zombies are coming. She says it herself after their journey beyond the wall that she had to see it to know and now she knows. Watchers also know that the mission was for Cersei's benefit, not Dany's. Budge on what exactly? Jon was preparing to go back North without her when Tyrion proposed his idea then. Jon and Dany were both fully prepared to go off on their separate missions until Tyrion's plan. Dany was already willing to help Jon, just not at the expense of her own goal (commendable for a female character not giving up her dream for a guy she has the warm and fuzzies for). She only abandons her goal once she SEES the magnitude of the problem and fully understands what Jon does. I don't understand the flack she's getting for not immediately siding with Jon. Even Tyrion tells him that him thinking she would is unrealistic. I don't understand the she's being played part. Unless it's that whole undercover jon theory which, as a Jon fan (both books and show) I'd really rather let people who believe that theory to believe it to their hearts content while I continue to ignore it. Jon goes along with it - why? Because it gives him what he wants ---the entire realm united against a greater enemy. Why wouldn't he go for it? Especially after Jorah volunteered to go. And then we saw how when the ceasefire didn't go her way, she was still torn about helping Jon. She couldn't let her own war go, without a super special ceasefire that no other character in Game of Thrones history has gotten. She literally tells Jon that he's right and she should've believed him from the beginning. But again, she had to see it to believe it. She had already let it go. They were hoping for both a ceasefire and combine their forces. Idealistic? Sure. But Dany is going off of Tyrion here, and believing that Cersei is a reasonable human being that cares about the lives of those she rules over. Think of Stannis pulling that same schtick. When Davos proposed that he should help defend the realm against the wildling attack, what if Stannis had said: "I won't go North and give the country to Joffrey. As soon as I march away, he marches in." Then when Davos proposes a ceasefire meeting, to convince Joffrey that the wildling threat is real, Stannis says "OK." Instead of laughing in his face at the absurdity of it all, like a smart person. Anyway, my point is that her own self-interest, stubbornness, and stupidity undercuts the selfless/heroic/romantic narrative that people seem to latch on to. Which makes me skeptical, again, why would Jon fall in madly love with such a person. I think we're just going to have to agree that we don't see the show (Dany specifically) the same way. Or I just rewatched season 7 (and re-reading the series) with a friend so it's fresher in my mind.

"Dany flew off to save Jorah too, or does he not even matter? He flayed himself alive for her but suddenly she's all about Jon? Dany showed up to get Jon out of a shitty situation that she put him in, then Benjen saved him." Dany had nothing to do with Jon being in the situation and even spoke out against it. Jon made the decision to go. The idea itself was Tyrion's brain child. All Dany did was look less that enthused about an obviously horrible plan, but she wanted to help Jon without jeopardizing her own mission. Tyrions (suicidal) plan was a means to that end. And sure, she went up North for Jorah as well, but the way She stared at Jon and Jon alone (watch the camera angles again, when it shows her circling on Drogon and looking down, the next shot has Jon in the center). And once she touched down, she offered no one else but Jon a hand up. So, with all that in mind, it's safe to say that he was a big factor in the reason she decided to fly her 3 dragons north to help on a suicide mission she didn't seem too keen on to begin with. Benjen saved Jon from himself. There was no other reason for him not hopping his tail on that dragon except D&D want his first (and only) dragon ride to be Raegal (and Dany, obvi) I'm with the people who think the ending is either gonna be Jon and Dany together ruling or both dead but their child taking over for them. With Tyrion as their adviser and Aunt/cousin Arya as their protector.

I like it so far. I love that they're making the mermaid out to be what she is, a deadly, highly intelligent predator and not some lovesick girl with a tail. Calling it now, main guy's girlfriend is a mermaid hybrid and her missing mom is a mermaid that went back home (to the sea).

"Then why was he complaining about being the one to keep the business afloat? I still don't think it's about the money for Jessica. She took pizza instead of the cash in the first episode. " I think that had more to do with the fact that she wasn't giving him his due as her employee. While she was off doing whatever, he was making sure they had updates to send to their clients, etc. Her bills were gonna keep getting paid because of him. At least that's how I took it. I could very well be wrong.

First off, can we all stop calling Trish a bitch? It's disconcerting that we're discussing a show that focuses on flawed women as fully fleshed out characters and some of us are minimizing those rich characterizations to them "just being selfish bratty bitch". It's highkey gross. Everybody annoyed me this season (except for Malcolm) but I also didn't feel like they were widely out of character or unsympathetic. Jessica wanted her family back in her mother, and found it hard to separate what she wanted to do vs what she needed to do. Alisa was a ticking time bomb that'd dropped way too many bodies for her to be able to just go on and live a regular life. Her getting taken out was unavoidable. And while it was unfortunate that Trish was the one that did it, I understood her reasoning. Costa traipsed into her hospital room and basically told her that her sister (her only true protector and family) was going to be collateral damage, so she the only thing she thought she could do. Get there first and make sure Jessica wasn't hurt. To add on to that, they made it very apparent this season (even touched on it last season) that Trish is an addict. And like Malcolm said, addicts need something to do. Being a hero was just a thing she decided was going to be her thing (like Malcolm and PI work/fixing up Jessica's apartment). What tipped her over the edge was using super soldier's inhaler when she thought Jessica was in trouble early on that season. she became addicted to that feeling of hyper awareness and "superness" (to the point where she was fidgety and unfocused without it) and, like the addict that she is, searched for a more permanent solution (high). Annoying? Yes. Selfish? Absolutely. But completely understandable based off who she is as a fully fleshed out character The thing with Jessica and Trish was that they always mirrored each other. Both were raped/controlled by people with power over them (and sometimes substances) and were dealing with the aftermath. They're also fighting against people's expectations ---Jessica the hero and Trish the "Patsy". Season 1 Trish just looked like she was the more together one, but there were signs that she could tip either way. I'm super excited to see were season 3 takes both of these unbelievably flawed, awesome female characters. "While for Jessica it was never about the money, he was the one trying to keep the business going by getting Jessica to take paying jobs." No he didn't. Malcolm was trying to convince Jessica that, because she'd taken so many paying jobs, they could afford to do a few pro bono cases.

Learning that Juliette is only 20(I remember seeing people asking how she's always drinking when she's not even of age yet. Which...have you ever been to college/she has friend who are of age to buy for her) helps me make so much sense of her actions. We're all dumb-in-love at that age.

"I think my biggest peeve is how the Strucker parents and kids were able to just waltz around the Mutant Underground and do as they wish, go on missions... now if the Fenris backstory/mythology, once it was revealed to the Underground, and affected the situation, I could run with that, but since the beginning, they (Struckers) never seemed to earn their stripes but held such prominence, had such a hold on the Underground." I always figured the Struckers had so much run 1). because of Reed's extensive knowledge of the legal system and how it works. 2). Because Lauren and Andy were two powerful/useful mutants and if they wanted their parents to let them keep using them for missions, then the PTB at the MU needed to play nice.

This show makes me feel like I'm taking crazy pills. Even if Juliette is a raging asshole in real life, the girls on this show make her look like a saint! (A really naïve saint that could do so much better in the relationship department than she is). Madison, Kelsey, and Chloe literally got in a huddle to talk about Juliette (not Alex, mind you) while the poor girl is literally just living her best life on the other side of the party. And they talk like she's such a bad person when 2 out of 3 of them are guilty of sleeping with her boyfriend! 1 for sure while she was still dating him. Like? And Juliette's such an idiot for dumping Garrett for Alex, Kelsey? It's almost like those three got together and decided this was going to be their storyline this season and ran with it. And poor Juliette going to Chloe and apologizing to her ten minutes after this chick was talking mad shit about her. Granted, she did disrupt her birthday party, but you can't stand their loudly talking about a person when they're in earshot and expect nothing to happen. Especially not when alcohol's involved...

That was Evangeline Whedon. She can turn into a dragon.

Their influence isn't long lasting. Eventually their victim in question could start to fight against their control, especially if it's only one sister left on detail. That, and as of right now, they're the only "on-the-ground, in the trenches" workers in the Hellfire club at the moment. Most of their attentions have been on recruitment. As for why one of them didn't go with Clarice, Marcos, and John, I fanwanked that they only stick with each other or people they see as "on their side" (Lorna, Andy, etc). After the 3-in-1 reveal, they're never seen alone with anyone else but each other or those 3, and the one time that they were (this episode) the lone sister was threatened. As for the repeated mentioning of Lorna as bipolar, it's mostly because that's a huge aspect of her character (in comics) Saw Andy and Lorna going dark since episode one. Neither one of them have defense only personality types, which is what the mutant underground's long term game plan seems to be (protect and run). So when the Cuckoos came in with actual game plan and long term goals in mind (a Mutant run country/state and safe haven), I honestly don't think they had to do much poking and prodding to get them there. Andy was team Cuckoo since they broke him out of jail, and Lorna too (she didn't seem all that upset about Esme tased Marcos, more amused tbh). Lorna's only hang-up was Marcos and not wanting to leave him behind. But all Esme had to do was convince Lorna that her concerns for her unborn child superseded her concern for Marcos and she flipped. That and Lorna and the triplets bonded over the course of the last two episodes. They were always sharing little smiles with each other when one of the 3 said something sassy, or how after their failed mission, instead of waiting outside of the house for Marcos, Clarice and John (who were in the other car with Cuckoo #3) she went inside with Cuckoo #1 and #2. She, like Andy, were slowly pulling away from the underground all episode/s.

"A) It's a poor comparison, mutants typically don't trigger till puberty as opposed to black people who tend to start off black and in some cases lighten over time" It actually works perfectly when you consider that black kids aren't considered "kids" anymore after a certain age. And are often seen as dangerous, especially if they're not tiny "B) Mutants have god like powers that allow them to regularly destroy buildings, ignore basic physics and rip holes in space time" ....okay? "C) Mutants have access to superior technology that allows them to leave Earth whenever they'd like" In comics, everyone has superior technology. Like the Fantastic 4 before they were fantastic. Tony Stark (technically). And I'm sure there are other humans, but I'm not as well versed in Marvel lore as I am in DC "D) The real life civil rights movement actually made significant progress over the last seven decades as demonstrated by the election of Obama and the reduction of 'racist' policies in the last 60 years while mutants have undergone a rinse repeat style of save the world, be hated, save the world, be hated and persecuted by the government for what the violent minority does. As demonstrated by the Civil War Saga where all mutants had to register and submit to government authority or be locked up in a hell dimension indefinitely without trial or due process." Same could be said for African Americans (as well as other minorities) to this day in the US. Look up Kalief Bowder; there was even a Netflix documentary on him. In fact, there are plenty of documentaries on the lapse of justice being served in the American Justice system. And just because Obama was elected president, doesn't mean that racism is suddenly over (look at Charlottesville, Dillon Booth, all the attacks on Mosques, etc) and to even insinuate that is very naïve. But we're getting off topic of the episode this thread is meant to be discussing, so.... I love the shakeup that The Cuckoos are adding to the overall story. And Andy's for sure joining Hellfire with them, along with Lorna.

"The entire Xmen franchise is based on an idiot premise, at any moment one of the supposed super geniuses could hire a PR firm, unionise mutants and set up a colony somewhere on a small island chain or another planet/dimension/moon. They don't because writers constantly blow up those colonies in order to return to the status quo of the mutants hunted and persecuted so we can endure 60 years of the same plot recycled ad nauseum." Actually, the point of The X-Men franchise was to mirror the civil rights movement of the 60s, with Professor X playing the part of MLK and Magneto as Malcolm X. When you look at the entire series from this perspective, it all makes sense. You have mutants that can pass for human (like the black folk that could pass for white) and those that can't (I.E. obviously black folk). The subject matter seems ad naseum bc it is ad naseum in real life. But on topic of this episode, I actually enjoyed it. It was very much a table setting episode for what's going to happen in the season finale as well as the second season. The Mutants are going to be divided into two warring entities that are ultimately fighting for the same end game (just like the comics).

I didn't get that either. The only explanation has to either be plot or she just doesn't do well in stressful situations unless John's involved (which....ew) The Stepford Cuckoos (formally known as the 5 in one, one time known as the 1,000 in one, and now simply 3 in 1) aren't all that powerful separately. They don't have a lot of range (she needed to be close) and can only control a single person at a time ---unlike Xavier and maybe Jean Grey who can do multiples...(sometimes hundreds if pushed). And even after the collars were off, Esme still never controlled more than one other person at a time, her sisters killed the guards on the bus (they knew the collars were off as soon as Esme knew...bc Telepaths). It wasn't until the three of them were close together that they started controlling more than one person at time. That is just how their power works. They're weak apart, but Alpha (almost Omega? someone correct me if I'm wrong) when they're together. Emma Frost is not a good guy and they wouldn't know who the Frost triplets even were. And technically they're And Esme's gonna creep bc Esme's just a creeper. She's always been the more underhanded sister in the comics. It's just who she is. Mark me down as one of the ones that don't believe Sonya's dead dead.

People I'm sad we didn't get to see: Cora, Braeden, and Allison (though, I understand all those actresses were busy.) The fact that most of the real fighting we saw came from the Hales (Derek, Malia, Peter), just goes to show that instead of Teen Wolf 2.0, they should've focused more on the Hale family and all their drama (that's enough material for a spin off there, but on a better network and with better Show runners). I too am pissed that Scott never got to kill anyone. Especially after Peter's whole "surround your precious Scott with killers" line to Malia. In fact, no one outside of the hunters and (maybe?) Kate killed anyone in the end. In short, I really want a Hale family biopic man. But with everyone: Peter, Derek, Cora, and Malia, with flashbacks of Laura and Talia. I want to know why Talia thought it prudent to take Peter's memory of his daughter. Did she do it because she knew her brother was unfit or...? They never explained that outside of her trying to hide Malia from her mother. Was it because she knew he wouldn't stay away from her and therefor put her in danger just by his constant proximity? Why didn't we get more Derek/Malia? Glad they finally let Sheriff go full on Retired Jonny Cage

They did show scenes from 6a (the part with Malia trying to save Scott from the whipper whippy people and him jumping in between her and the wall). The only reason I can think for them not showing scenes from earlier seasons is they don't want to make it look like she was falling in love with Scott while she was still Stiles. Which...why? They totally retconned Lydia's feelings for Stiles and had him be dating Malia while still being in love with Lydia. But then again, people are quicker to forgive male characters than the female ones. The problem with a lot of teen wolf scenes is the music. Like, they play this super dramatic bg music when characters are just like....talking? Why? Other than that, I've effectively been able to turn off my brain for an hour and let this show sooth my GOT woes (I have to wait until 2019?!?!). It's like watching a CW show (that isn't The 100, JTV, or iZombie), a lot of things don't make sense except for plot...the minute you accept that, the more enjoyable your watching experience will be.

She was playing the game. She did warn Sansa that she wouldn't enjoy being the asker, lol! I knew she wasn't being serious the moment she said "I wonder what it would be like to wear those pretty dresses. Be the Lady of Winterfell." Arya has never wanted any of those things and has even scoffed at them.

To be fair to the science teacher (and most teachers), apparently teachers are not allowed to intervene when students fight anymore. It's a liability issue. Either the cop assigned to the school or a special appointed person have to break them up. I learned that from all my teacher friends. In that light, it made sense that coach would be the one to break them up. But then again, I could be giving them too much credit. I'm with the other poster that said that Monroe's reasoning being stupid and nonsensical worked for me. Bigots tend to have dumb reasons for the way they think ("they stole all our jobs!" "they're all criminals and unsafe", etc).

I felt that scene was more Scott humoring Malia then believing she could actually "hack" his computer. Really, all she was doing was trying to guess his logon password so they could look at his schedule. Most females can do as much...(they even touched on female's abilities to get information in zero seconds flat in this techno obsessed world on last week's episode of Insecure). I'm surprisingly okay with the idea of the two of them together. And I didn't even realize until someone else pointed it out that Malia is the first person in season's to legitimately worry about Scott-Scott and not Alpha-werewolf-scott. That was sweet

So....Scott and Malia now? Has there been any talks about this anywhere? Like...I don't mind it (they probably should've gone with them in the beginning) but...why?