Hookian August 2, 2016 Share August 2, 2016 The only time I want to see Baby Neal again is in the epilogue where he's at least a toddler along w/ Rumbelle baby, Robyn, and CS babies. 6 hours ago, Serena said: That interview was Peak Annoying I'm just glad we can at least confirm that CS are living together within the first couple of episodes if not the end of the premiere. 2 Link to comment
PixiePaws1 August 2, 2016 Share August 2, 2016 I notice the airship has what looks like buttercups carved into it....coincidence? ?? It really is a beautiful thing... 1 Link to comment
Serena August 2, 2016 Share August 2, 2016 As far as I'm concerned, I would be satisfied if the next time we see Neal is when he turns 18 and can officially petition the Storybrooke Tribunal for a new name. 8 Link to comment
daxx August 2, 2016 Share August 2, 2016 It looks like a broken rudder/propeller in the foreground and it has several rope ladders laying out like people were escaping. Link to comment
YaddaYadda August 2, 2016 Share August 2, 2016 I wonder why people wanna see baby Neal. It's like with Pistachio and baby Omen. I doubt we'll even see them. Baby Omen maybe more so than the 2 others because I'm assuming people will be worried they have a wee!Dark One on their hands. Baby Neal isn't even needed now considering they will be creating a whole Savior mythology which will probably mean that being born out of true love has no bearings on whether one has magic or not. Baby Neal is a squib, let's all get over it. Baby Omen on the other hand...I'm assuming Rumple will be the first Dark One to father child. I'm not talking about Baelfire because Bae was born well before Rumple was the Dark One so that doesn't count. Too bad they did a half-assed job with the Dark One mythology last season. 2 Link to comment
Curio August 2, 2016 Share August 2, 2016 3 minutes ago, YaddaYadda said: I wonder why people wanna see baby Neal. It's like with Pistachio and baby Omen. I doubt we'll even see them. It's not that I want to see babies on screen (because let's face it...they're boring, annoying, and useless), it's more that the babies exist within the world of OUAT, so I expect to see them around now. At the bare minimum, there should be prop babies somewhere in the background, they don't even have to hire baby actors. The writers made the decision to bring babies into their world, and now they have to use them because it affects the characterizations of the mothers and fathers on the show. If we never see Snow or Charming taking care of Neal, their characters become uncaring and neglectful because they'd prefer to have a babysitter 24/7. If A&E don't care to show the babies on screen, then they shouldn't have written them into existence to begin with. That airship does look really cool. I hope we get to see a certain captain sailing one before the season is over. 5 Link to comment
Shanna Marie August 2, 2016 Share August 2, 2016 That shot of the airship kind of reminds me of the one in Stardust. Speaking of ships, did we ever hear anything about them shooting the Lady Washington at sea? If they were only shooting on her at the dock, they may as well have used the barge. With the real ship, they at least needed to let her sail into the harbor. Using the real ship just to sit at the dock would be like bringing in a stunt double with a highly specialized skill set (martial arts, gymnastics, etc.) to film scenes of walking down the street. Link to comment
Souris August 2, 2016 Share August 2, 2016 1 minute ago, Shanna Marie said: That shot of the airship kind of reminds me of the one in Stardust. Speaking of ships, did we ever hear anything about them shooting the Lady Washington at sea? If they were only shooting on her at the dock, they may as well have used the barge. With the real ship, they at least needed to let her sail into the harbor. Using the real ship just to sit at the dock would be like bringing in a stunt double with a highly specialized skill set (martial arts, gymnastics, etc.) to film scenes of walking down the street. We didn't hear anything about them filming the Lady Washington at sea. However, I find it unrealistic they'd pay the money to bring the ship all the way up there just for one scene of Hook & Belle on deck -- like you said, they could've used the barge instead for much cheaper. Now, I tracked the Lady Washington over that night, and it did some funky movements around the docks over several hours on either side of midnight. I have no idea if that is something they do with a ship regularly or it indicates movement for filming purposes. It didn't go out to sea that I saw on its tracker. But, that evening also happened to be the night after a full moon -- and if you had a tall ship, wouldn't it be a nice shot to film it against a full moon? If they didn't, they wasted a prime opportunity. There are rumors she will be back in Steveston on Aug. 8 for filming. She's not scheduled for tours at her home port that day... Link to comment
Mitch August 2, 2016 Share August 2, 2016 1 hour ago, Curio said: 's not that I want to see babies on screen (because let's face it...they're boring, annoying, and useless), it's more that the babies exist within the world of OUAT, so I expect to see them around now. At the bare minimum, there should be prop babies somewhere in the background, they don't even have to hire baby actors. Yea, I don't want to see babies..the show is a campy soap so just mention..."Granny is watching Neil," or whatever and leave it at that. Granny is now the Aunt Clara/ Mrs. Trumball of this show! Link to comment
KAOS Agent August 2, 2016 Share August 2, 2016 (edited) Here's my question for the season. If the Evil Queen loves Henry so much and wouldn't hurt him, isn't the part where she wants to destroy everyone he loves completely counter to that? Killing/hurting/attacking Snow, Emma, David, Baby Snowflake would deeply hurt Henry. That's not love. Wasn't there an entire plot where Regina was using Cora parenting style tactics and it was bad? Didn't they have a thing where Regina explained how she was going to kill everyone and Henry objected and got mind wiped? Wasn't this supposed to be hurtful and bad? This whole thing is so stupid and makes no sense. Edited August 2, 2016 by KAOS Agent 5 Link to comment
YaddaYadda August 2, 2016 Share August 2, 2016 (edited) I still can't even wrap my head around the whole the EQ loves Henry when they have basically stripped everything Regina from her. If Charles Manson can love (or whatever) so can the EQ I guess. I'm just really having a hard time with this and how she's now a 3rd mom. She loves Henry and hates everyone else in his life. I'm assuming Henry will have another I'm going to destroy magic meltdown. Give me Emma's story with her Snowing and Hook. Regina and the EQ can keep Henry. Edited August 2, 2016 by YaddaYadda 1 Link to comment
Souris August 2, 2016 Share August 2, 2016 The EQ loving Henry makes ZERO logical sense given that she is supposed to be completely evil & conscience-less. They're trying to have it both ways, of course. I kept trying to come up with interesting theories about Hook's secret and why it would really affect Charming, but then I remembered and accepted: No, self, save your imagination, it’s This Show, These Writers. They do tend to oversell things ::cough::Ursula::cough:: but they also like to throw bad things into flashbacks as a way to “level the playing field” and make Regina and her crimes not seem so bad or unusual ::cough::Snowing eggnapping::cough::. So, yeah, I do agree that the secret will be that Hook killed Charming’s father or played a big role in his death. If PapaCharming confessed to him in a tavern that he had sold his son, that would push Hook’s trigger bigtime. Bye-bye, PapaCharming. Contrived as hell, of course, but TS, TW. A&E would consider that tit-for-tat for Regina’s role in Snow’s father’s death and her killing Graham, so we can we please stop judging her for that and wanting justice? Link to comment
Camera One August 2, 2016 Share August 2, 2016 A&E would consider that tit-for-tat for Regina’s role in Snow’s father’s death and her killing Graham, so we can we please stop judging her for that and wanting justice? Snow's father getting killed was just desserts for Snow getting Daniel killed. And don't forget Snow also killed Cora, preventing an epic mother-daughter journey of redemption for the ages. Link to comment
PixiePaws1 August 2, 2016 Share August 2, 2016 The EQ loves Henry. ....hmm....the EQ gives Henry TLK..because if Regina can do it without her heart then, why not? Makes perfect sense in A+E world. Would they dare try that shit on us? Would they go that far?...... (should i be using that sarcasm font?!) 2 Link to comment
Souris August 2, 2016 Share August 2, 2016 (edited) 11 minutes ago, Camera One said: Snow's father getting killed was just desserts for Snow getting Daniel killed. And don't forget Snow also killed Cora, preventing an epic mother-daughter journey of redemption for the ages. Well, yes, but we keep talking about Regina killing Graham. That is unacceptable! We need more incentive to stop that, clearly. Quote The EQ loves Henry. ....hmm....the EQ gives Henry TLK..because if Regina can do it without her heart then, why not? Makes perfect sense in A+E world. Would they dare try that shit on us? Would they go that far?...... (should i be using that sarcasm font?!) Thus breaking the "curse" of the split, sending the EQ back into Regina! TLKs break any curse! (Who cares if it was a potion & not a curse? Hook's enchanted hook went from a spell to a potion.) Edited August 2, 2016 by Souris Link to comment
scenicbyway August 2, 2016 Share August 2, 2016 Perhaps Regina will have to TLK the EQ. The story becomes Regina learning to love all the parts of herself? 4 Link to comment
Curio August 2, 2016 Share August 2, 2016 17 minutes ago, scenicbyway said: Perhaps Regina will have to TLK the EQ. The story becomes Regina learning to love all the parts of herself? "Regina, you just have to learn to love yourself. Even the bad parts!" Honestly, I'd totally take that over Regina giving Henry a TLK without a heart any day. 2 Link to comment
Shanna Marie August 2, 2016 Share August 2, 2016 5 minutes ago, Curio said: "Regina, you just have to learn to love yourself. Even the bad parts!" Belle could be the one to give her the pep talk that leads to this epiphany -- "Yes, even the dark part of you is good and worthy of love!" I'm being snarky, but that did sound a lot like some of the interviews about Belle. 1 Link to comment
Rumsy4 August 2, 2016 Share August 2, 2016 Every time Belle talks about loving Rumple's "dark parts", my mind goes to the gutter. 4 Link to comment
KingOfHearts August 2, 2016 Share August 2, 2016 (edited) 1 hour ago, Curio said: "Regina, you just have to learn to love yourself. Even the bad parts!" Belle's words of wisdom, I imagine. Quote Every time Belle talks about loving Rumple's "dark parts", my mind goes to the gutter. I'm sure she discovered his "dark parts" as Lacey. Edited August 2, 2016 by KingOfHearts Link to comment
mjgchick August 3, 2016 Share August 3, 2016 Remember when Elsa (the one friend to never screw Emma over.) taught Emma to love herself? I really hope Emma is no where near this mess. Give Belle something to do. Even Snow deserves better. Link to comment
Souris August 3, 2016 Share August 3, 2016 1 hour ago, mjgchick said: Remember when Elsa (the one friend to never screw Emma over.) taught Emma to love herself? I really hope Emma is no where near this mess. Give Belle something to do. Even Snow deserves better. Funny you mention Elsa, because Georgina Haig was just spotted arriving in Vancouver. If Disney didn't have such a tight rein on Elsa, I'd say now's their chance to have Elsa screw Emma over somehow to show how good a friend Regina is! Link to comment
KingOfHearts August 3, 2016 Share August 3, 2016 48 minutes ago, Souris said: Funny you mention Elsa, because Georgina Haig was just spotted arriving in Vancouver. If Disney didn't have such a tight rein on Elsa, I'd say now's their chance to have Elsa screw Emma over somehow to show how good a friend Regina is! A&E: "We didn't think Aladdin, the Evil Queen, Jekyll/Hyde and the Land of Untold Stories were going to be enough to get viewers." 2 Link to comment
Arnella August 3, 2016 Share August 3, 2016 Just saw the trailers. I love Oded Fehr. I love the thought of him playing over the top evil. But can I eye candy watch for him and Robert Carlyle and not be perpetually nauseated by the writers drooling over Regina? Let's face it: if they could eliminate all other story lines and only keep the other characters around as foils to Regina, they WOULD. Their resentment that they have to waste time on other stories has gotten pretty obvious. 1 Link to comment
Rumsy4 August 3, 2016 Share August 3, 2016 23 minutes ago, retrograde said: Zap2It: Hook & Emma’s Season 6 plans are … to Netflix and chill? I'm glad that the writers are at least talking about exploring this. Though I feel this is to service "can the savior be happy?" angst. I noticed the transcribed part of the interview left out Eddy's facetious remarks. lol 2 Link to comment
Shanna Marie August 3, 2016 Share August 3, 2016 Given that they've used "sitting at home and watching Netflix" in a disparaging way in past interviews as their code for "boring things no one wants to watch," I'm inclined to read this as "Emma and Hook will be sidelined this season." Or else we'll get one scene, just to show us how boring it is, before some new angst gets dropped on them. 4 Link to comment
pezgirl7 August 3, 2016 Share August 3, 2016 12 minutes ago, Rumsy4 said: I'm glad that the writers are at least talking about exploring this. Though I feel this is to service "can the savior be happy?" angst. I noticed the transcribed part of the interview left out Eddy's facetious remarks. lol What did he say? I can't watch the video. I think it's funny that those are their plans for CS now after they said in the past that no one wants to see that! Link to comment
YaddaYadda August 3, 2016 Share August 3, 2016 25 minutes ago, Shanna Marie said: Given that they've used "sitting at home and watching Netflix" in a disparaging way in past interviews as their code for "boring things no one wants to watch," I'm inclined to read this as "Emma and Hook will be sidelined this season." Or else we'll get one scene, just to show us how boring it is, before some new angst gets dropped on them. This is most definitely a plot point. My friend just bet me a bottle of wine that Hook will get all emo when he sees one of the movies listed on there because it likely has to do with his secret. 2 Link to comment
RadioGirl27 August 3, 2016 Share August 3, 2016 1 hour ago, Rumsy4 said: I'm glad that the writers are at least talking about exploring this. Though I feel this is to service "can the savior be happy?" angst. Pretty much. They are not going to explore Emma and Hook being a couple, but use it to intensify Emma's (and Hook's, because of his secret) angst. Link to comment
OnceUponAJen August 3, 2016 Share August 3, 2016 I'll believe down time when I see it. I subscribe to the theory that they'll make it as boring as hell just to prove a point. 1 Link to comment
Rumsy4 August 3, 2016 Share August 3, 2016 (edited) 1 hour ago, pezgirl7 said: What did he say? I can't watch the video. He said something stupid about them watching Borgen, a Danish political drama (edited) becasue Emma read somewhere that it was good. Adam also said Henry is going to make list of movies for Hook to watch. I would highly recommend Hook to burn that list, considering the movies Henry has on his phone. Edited August 3, 2016 by Rumsy4 6 Link to comment
Hookian August 3, 2016 Share August 3, 2016 7 minutes ago, Rumsy4 said: He said something stupid about them watching Borgen, a Danish political drama (edited) becasue Emma read somewhere that it was good. Adam also said Henry is going to make list of movies for Hook to watch. I would highly recommend Hook to burn that list, considering the movies Henry has on his phone. Actually I think Henry will recommend Peter Pan and Hook, just to see Hook's horrific reaction to what he looks like. Emma's black leather jacket really looks like Killian's. I wonder if that is symbolizing the fact her walls are down. The red jacket was her putting her walls up. They changed the sex of Cinderella's baby to it's correct one. LMAO I can't believe they corrected it. Link to comment
KingOfHearts August 3, 2016 Share August 3, 2016 Henry would recommend some 80s movie his dad said "chicks dig". 3 Link to comment
Hookian August 3, 2016 Share August 3, 2016 I'm sure this may make anti CS fans bitter but Swan Jones family scene is being filmed now. Hook and Henry are playfully swordfighting. 2 Link to comment
InsertWordHere August 3, 2016 Share August 3, 2016 2 hours ago, Hookian said: They changed the sex of Cinderella's baby to it's correct one. LMAO I can't believe they corrected it. IMO, they never had it wrong. Baby girls can go by Alex and not wear clothing that screams out, "I'm a girl!" 5 Link to comment
Eolivet August 3, 2016 Share August 3, 2016 On 8/1/2016 at 1:55 PM, Rumsy4 said: Quote KITSIS: It’s the Sayid episode [of Lost]: “Perhaps.” What does that even mean?? Wasn't the Sayid episode of Lost the one that revealed while he may have been a member of the Iraqi guard and a torturer, he was really just misunderstood and did it all to save the woman he loved? ...I'm suddenly realizing where these writers get their ideas. Link to comment
Rumsy4 August 3, 2016 Share August 3, 2016 4 minutes ago, Eolivet said: Wasn't the Sayid episode of Lost the one that revealed while he may have been a member of the Iraqi guard and a torturer, he was really just misunderstood and did it all to save the woman he loved? That was certainly the pattern for Sayid flashbacks. But as an answer to the question "Do any of the Untold Story characters come from the Enchanted Forest?" it makes no sense to me. Quote ...I'm suddenly realizing where these writers get their ideas. They've been rifling ideas from LOST from the beginning! lol Quote Hook and Henry are playfully swordfighting. Daaawww... Link to comment
PixiePaws1 August 3, 2016 Share August 3, 2016 In the set photo Emma wearing same blouse as the photo of her lying on Archie's couch. Link to comment
pezgirl7 August 3, 2016 Share August 3, 2016 I love Emma's new black leather jacket. She and Hook look like the hippest parents! And going back to the baby talk from a few days ago, a CS baby is really the only one I'd be interested in seeing. Link to comment
Rumsy4 August 3, 2016 Share August 3, 2016 1 minute ago, Rumsy4 said: More on Captain Cobra Swan scene. http://dassala.tumblr.com/post/148410877538/dassala-laurencliftxo-on-twitter-ishttp://onceuponamirror.tumblr.com/post/148411202711/interesting-how-the-cinderella-episode-is Who freezes them? There was a guy wearing a sea-faring hat in the periscope videos. Maybe he has something to do with it. Quote Emma holding a shoe. The "other" shoe? Quote I love Emma's new black leather jacket. She and Hook look like the hippest parents! I'm loving it too! And yes--they do! Link to comment
mjgchick August 3, 2016 Share August 3, 2016 I can smell the salty tears a mile away. Their are totally using "struggle to be a normal couple" as a stupid plot of Hook not thinking he's good enough or Emma thinking she doesn't deserve to be happy. Those two are perfect for each other. 2 Link to comment
KingOfHearts August 3, 2016 Share August 3, 2016 (edited) Quote Shouldn’t you be at school? They took Henry to Camelot and the Underworld, so why should they care if Henry is in school? There's no way Henry isn't failing it. Paige: "Why do you get to ditch school whenever you want?" Henry: "Because my mom is the sheriff, my other mom is the mayor, my grandma is the teacher, and my grandpa is the other sheriff." Paige: "Oh. It must be nice to be a privileged main character." Edited August 3, 2016 by KingOfHearts 5 Link to comment
PixiePaws1 August 3, 2016 Share August 3, 2016 The wedding dress has been replaced with this lovely light concoction...anyone seen it before..because the wedding dress looked a lot like one from OUaT in W... https://mobile.twitter.com/LaurenCliftxo/media/grid?idx=2 Link to comment
Shanna Marie August 3, 2016 Share August 3, 2016 Maybe they're trying to allude to the Cinderella dress? It's not quite the same as the live action movie Cinderella dress, but it's a similar shade of blue, and they do seem to be filming the Cinderella episode. 1 Link to comment
daxx August 4, 2016 Share August 4, 2016 Katrina says it's the same dress that was there since 0601. Link to comment
Souris August 4, 2016 Share August 4, 2016 (edited) Cinderella has a shotgun. Looks like she is going after somebody. IMO, probably whoever she's connected to from the LoUS. I'm guessing this person somehow threatens her happy ending. Edited August 4, 2016 by Souris Link to comment
KAOS Agent August 4, 2016 Share August 4, 2016 9 hours ago, InsertWordHere said: IMO, they never had it wrong. Baby girls can go by Alex and not wear clothing that screams out, "I'm a girl!" What they had wrong was the baby's age. Alex should have been a toddler (two-ish), not a baby. Adam acknowledged the error at the time and it seems like they've cast an age appropriate child this time, so bravo for fixing continuity errors. 2 Link to comment
KingOfHearts August 4, 2016 Share August 4, 2016 8 hours ago, Souris said: Cinderella has a shotgun. Looks like she is going after somebody. IMO, probably whoever she's connected to from the LoUS. I'm guessing this person somehow threatens her happy ending. "Cinderella has a shotgun." Only on Once Upon a Time! 7 Link to comment
Shanna Marie August 4, 2016 Share August 4, 2016 4 hours ago, KingOfHearts said: "Cinderella has a shotgun." Only on Once Upon a Time! And that's the kind of thing I signed up for when I started watching this show, some crazy mash-up weirdness putting fairy tale characters in unexpected situations. 7 Link to comment
KingOfHearts August 4, 2016 Share August 4, 2016 (edited) 14 hours ago, KAOS Agent said: What they had wrong was the baby's age. Alex should have been a toddler (two-ish), not a baby. Adam acknowledged the error at the time and it seems like they've cast an age appropriate child this time, so bravo for fixing continuity errors. I just assumed it was a second child. I don't believe she ever called it by name in 4x07. But I'm not sure why Alex wouldn't have been there. Edited August 4, 2016 by KingOfHearts Link to comment
Recommended Posts