Jump to content

Type keyword(s) to search
Forum Reorganization

Chit-Chat: The Feels

CM-BlueButterfly

By CM-BlueButterfly
in Everything Else

Recommended Posts

mostlylurking

mostlylurking

 

13 hours ago, Soapy Goddess said:

Where was your party's compassion for the victims of violent crime, and the 13 year old who had brain surgery? Not one Dem could find it in their heart to stand and/or clap. Such spitefulness...because they don't like DJT.

For me, I can’t stand when people are trotted out just to bolster the current President and their agenda.  I hate it when republicans do it and I hate when democrats do it.  Look, here’s a boy with cancer we helped!  Look, this person has a TBI!  Here’s some people who lost a beloved family member in a super traumatic way!  Let’s all clap!  It’s manipulative and just feels gross to me.

14 hours ago, Lantern7 said:

Once again: THE MORAL HIGH GROUND IS MEANINGLESS.

That’s what I’ve been saying too.  Dems didn’t go far enough.  They should have all walked out when that Texas congressman was ejected.  Better yet, they shouldn’t have shown up at all.

  • Like 17
  • Applause 1
  • Replies 9.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Annber03
Annber03

And yet the same people who are awed by his celebrity are also the ones talkng about how celebritees need to stay out of politics. You'll pardon me if I can't take their critiques all that seriously. 

Annber03
Annber03

For as long as I live, I will never understand the hold this guy has over people. 

Annber03
Annber03

Everything I want to say would be a string of curse words at this point.  Hope you're happy, people who decided to be all precious with your votes or who felt this guy deserved another chance aft

Posted Images

Dimity

Dimity

(edited)

So the CBC has an article titled "JD Vance goes on the offensive and offends, for Trump".  I mean sure, he is actually doing that and managing to piss off multiple countries, not to mention the Catholic Church while doing so but c'mon.  He's the bully boy?  With the eyeliner and that improbable beard?  I mean,  yeah, he's totally obnoxious but he's just such a knob (as the Aussies would say - and did).

 

Untitled.jpg

Edited by Dimity
  • Like 4
  • Wink 1
  • LOL 5
Bliss

Bliss

I did not write this... it was sent to me via email:

(to answer the question of 'why' is tRump Putin's puppet?)

Someday the true story of Donald Trump’s Russian connection will be told and it will read like a spy novel worthy of Tom Clancy…
It’s the story of a beauty pageant that led to the election of a President.
In 2013 Trump was beyond broke.  He was deeply in debt and after five bankruptcies, not a bank in America would lend him money. He did however still own the rights to the Miss Universe Contest and in November of that year he took the pageant to Moscow.
For a week Mr. Trump and a bevy of the most beautiful young women in the world partied with all the big wigs in Russia… politicos, oligarchs, rock stars, celebrities, even Vladimir Putin himself.
There has been much speculation about what went down in that week of booze, babes and big money, but whatever it was, it changed the course of history.
It’s common knowledge that every hotel room in Moscow is bugged and who knows what Mr. Putin’s KGB cameras might have picked up.  Trump, as a high profile visitor would be under constant surveillance.
The Miss Universe party ended and within weeks the Trump organization received a six hundred million dollar loan from Deutsche Bank… a German banking giant that had previously been convicted of illegally laundering money for the Russians.
Trump left Moscow with the financial backing he so desperately needed and Putin had his hooks in Trump.
In 2015 Trump announced his candidacy for POTUS and Putin began actively cultivating his asset.
The Mueller report states unequivocally that Russia conducted a systematic misinformation campaign designed to tarnish Trump’s opponents and promote his candidacy.
Russia’s influence in the 2016 election was pervasive and it worked…
With Putin’s help Donald J Trump became the 45th President of the United States and he wasted no time paying off his pal Vladimir…
Trump spoke glowingly of him every chance he got… every executive decision benefited Putin.
He ceded the middle east to Russia, withdrew from Syria and allowed Putin to fill the void.
He turned his back on Ukraine, the last bastion standing between Russia and a free Europe.
He disavowed NATO, the alliance that had held Russia at bay for over 70 years.
He pulled US troops out of Germany… something the Kremlin has always wanted.
At the Helsinki summit, Trump chose to publicly believe Putin over his own intelligence agencies.
He attacked America’s friends and embraced her enemies just like Putin wanted.
At home Trump became the “divider in chief” driving deep divisions between all the different factions of American society.
To divide America from within… to drive a wedge between blacks and whites, rich and poor, left and right, has long been a part of Putin’s KGB playbook.
Russian hackers are inflaming racial tensions across the country, infiltrating radical groups, political parties and planting disinformation on social media.
We can only hope that the US Intelligence Services are prepared to address these threats because obviously Mr. Trump isn’t. 

  • Like 5
  • Fire 2
  • Applause 2
  • Useful 8
  • Love 1
krankydoodle

krankydoodle

10 hours ago, tres bien said:

Trying to create a you stand up and cheer for me or you hate kids with cancer. 

That's the moment that right wing spaces seems to have latched onto. It was the main story on Fox News when I checked this morning, and there are also featured articles about the other people he mentioned in his address with complaints about the way Democrats responded. I know I shouldn't be surprised but I can't believe they're still able to rile people up and make the focus individual cases when Trump is destroying institutions, relationships with allies, the economy, regulations, etc. I've wanted to read more about propaganda tactics because it's kind of fascinating, but fanfiction is really the only thing I'm able to read right now.

  • Like 10
  • Hugs 1
  • Angry 3
  • Love 1
tres bien

tres bien

Meanwhile we’re right back to the democrats have no leader and no message and should have done this and not that and on and on 

I think it’s obvious. If the democrats had a leader or in yesterday’s case two, they would have had a cohesive plan to have the democrats in both chambers show up in unison and when he opened his mouth and uttered one word they would have stood up and walked out of the chamber together 

Shown waving childish signs? Throwing Rep Green out while the rest sat there and showed no unity? Listening to a crazed man baby calling a senator Pocahontas, attacking his predecessor and calling himself the most successful president in history in his first 30 days in office etc etc etc

Democrats when is enough enough?

If the democrats don’t know who the leader of the party is then it’s up to us to tell them because if you don’t have us you have nothing 

If the democrats don’t have a message then it’s up to us to tell them because if you’re going to have to run on the things that all voters care about not just die hard democrats if you want to win in 2026

I don’t want to hear from whiny Chuck Schumer the weakest majority leader the dems could have been stuck with. I love Hakeem Jeffries but being a great orator is not cutting it in this contemptuous time

2026 is going to come a lot faster than the current dems think and winning control of the House is not a choice it’s a must 

  • Like 5
  • Fire 1
  • Applause 6
  • Useful 1
Ohiopirate02

Ohiopirate02

8 minutes ago, Bliss said:

I did not write this... it was sent to me via email:

(to answer the question of 'why' is tRump Putin's puppet?)

Someday the true story of Donald Trump’s Russian connection will be told and it will read like a spy novel worthy of Tom Clancy…
It’s the story of a beauty pageant that led to the election of a President.
In 2013 Trump was beyond broke.  He was deeply in debt and after five bankruptcies, not a bank in America would lend him money. He did however still own the rights to the Miss Universe Contest and in November of that year he took the pageant to Moscow.
For a week Mr. Trump and a bevy of the most beautiful young women in the world partied with all the big wigs in Russia… politicos, oligarchs, rock stars, celebrities, even Vladimir Putin himself.
There has been much speculation about what went down in that week of booze, babes and big money, but whatever it was, it changed the course of history.
It’s common knowledge that every hotel room in Moscow is bugged and who knows what Mr. Putin’s KGB cameras might have picked up.  Trump, as a high profile visitor would be under constant surveillance.
The Miss Universe party ended and within weeks the Trump organization received a six hundred million dollar loan from Deutsche Bank… a German banking giant that had previously been convicted of illegally laundering money for the Russians.
Trump left Moscow with the financial backing he so desperately needed and Putin had his hooks in Trump.
In 2015 Trump announced his candidacy for POTUS and Putin began actively cultivating his asset.
 

I can believe a lot of this. Russians bugging hotel rooms is known as well as them using WiFi to spy on people. Donald may not drink, but is completely capable of falling into a honeypot. Honestly, the honeypot is designed to catch men like him.

  • Like 11
  • Wink 1
  • Love 1
Bastet

Bastet

6 hours ago, ProudMary said:

as he was exiting, DJT clapped Roberts on the shoulder and said, "I won't forget what you did." Roberts was not pleased.

The truth hurts, doesn't it, Justice Roberts?

5 hours ago, kittykat said:

Everyone got mad at the Democrats because they felt they prioritized identity politics over economic ones

Which was inaccurate.  Trump centered identify politics by campaigning on a platform of hate-fueled denial of rights to those who are not straight, cisgender, Christian, white men without disabilities.  To which Democrats had to respond with a commitment to governing for the benefit of all, not just that group.  But the mainstream media ignored that straight, cisgender, Christian, white men without disabilities is an identity.  So it only got called identify politics when it was a Democrat defending any of the various groups under attack with every given Trump proposal.  If it's about white folks, no mention.  People of color?  Identity!  Men, no mention.  Women?  Identity!  Cisgender?  Not a single peep, ever.  Transgender?  Identify!  Agenda!  Danger! 

  • Like 9
  • Applause 1
  • Useful 1
  • Love 1
Liddy52

Liddy52

5 hours ago, Yeah No said:

When I researched this online the gov't. says it only requires SS payments to be sent back if they were received or deposited AFTER the person died. So it depends on what month you're talking about. If a person dies late in the month they're not going to ask for any payment they received that was cashed or deposited before they died that month, but any payment that is received AFTER they died has to be returned. Since my father died on the 5th of the month and his last SS payment was deposited in our joint account a few days before he died, I was not required to return it. But if he had received another payment the next month I would have had to return the money. But he didn't. I guess when people die late in the month there might be more of a chance of a payment being made to them after they died than in my father's case.

My mother passed away at around noon on January 31 of 2019. Social Security withdrew the entire January payment, from her checking account, even though she had lived all but 8 hours of January.  Not the February payment, the January payment.  And they had withdrawn it within two weeks of her death. I checked with Social Security and they verified that it was correct that they had taken all of her January payment even though she had been alive 99% of the month. My father in law passed away November 8 of 2018, and his entire payment for November was deducted from his checking account within a matter of weeks.  At least though, he had only lived 8 days of that month. 

  • Mind Blown 2
  • Sad 4
  • Angry 4
Kemper

Kemper

17 hours ago, Lantern7 said:

Watching Colbert. Seeing that the Democrats were waving paddles in protest. I gotta agree with Stephen . . . why don't they do more? I'm thinking security checks everyone for weapons . . . but what about eggs? What better way to protest this president by pelting him with something he said that he'd make cheaper?

Now this post is brilliant!

  • Like 2
  • Applause 2
  • Love 1
Yeah No

Yeah No

14 minutes ago, Liddy52 said:

My mother passed away at around noon on January 31 of 2019. Social Security withdrew the entire January payment, from her checking account, even though she had lived all but 8 hours of January.  Not the February payment, the January payment.  And they had withdrawn it within two weeks of her death. I checked with Social Security and they verified that it was correct that they had taken all of her January payment even though she had been alive 99% of the month. My father in law passed away November 8 of 2018, and his entire payment for November was deducted from his checking account within a matter of weeks.  At least though, he had only lived 8 days of that month. 

That's harsh but she didn't live all the way through January - by only a few hours. My father lived all the way through March and died in early April so they didn't ask for his March payment back even though it was deposited in April. I was talking about not having to return the payment for the month before a person died, which comes on the month they died. It has to be frustrating when someone dies so close to the end of a month and their payment was already sent before the gov't. knew they didn't make it through the month.

  • Like 3
Macbeth1966

Macbeth1966

1 hour ago, tres bien said:

Meanwhile we’re right back to the democrats have no leader and no message and should have done this and not that and on and on 

I think it’s obvious. If the democrats had a leader or in yesterday’s case two, they would have had a cohesive plan to have the democrats in both chambers show up in unison and when he opened his mouth and uttered one word they would have stood up and walked out of the chamber together 

Shown waving childish signs? Throwing Rep Green out while the rest sat there and showed no unity? Listening to a crazed man baby calling a senator Pocahontas, attacking his predecessor and calling himself the most successful president in history in his first 30 days in office etc etc etc

Democrats when is enough enough?

If the democrats don’t know who the leader of the party is then it’s up to us to tell them because if you don’t have us you have nothing 

If the democrats don’t have a message then it’s up to us to tell them because if you’re going to have to run on the things that all voters care about not just die hard democrats if you want to win in 2026

I don’t want to hear from whiny Chuck Schumer the weakest majority leader the dems could have been stuck with. I love Hakeem Jeffries but being a great orator is not cutting it in this contemptuous time

2026 is going to come a lot faster than the current dems think and winning control of the House is not a choice it’s a must 

The protest in pink clothes - What was that all about?  It made no sense at all.

One of the Representatives stated:

“Women are claiming pink as a color of protest, as a color of power, and we are protesting what is happening right now."

Pink is not a power color.  Seriously?  Now Blood Red is a power color that would have reflected that many people are about to die due to this Cretin.

I am pretty sure that it was offered up as a choice but was probably seen as too radical. Heaven forfend.  

  • Like 5
  • Fire 1
  • Useful 1
peacheslatour

peacheslatour

(edited)
11 minutes ago, Macbeth1966 said:

The protest in pink clothes - What was that all about?  It made no sense at all.

One of the Representatives stated:

“Women are claiming pink as a color of protest, as a color of power, and we are protesting what is happening right now."

Pink is not a power color.  Seriously?  Now Blood Red is a power color that would have reflected that many people are about to die due to this Cretin.

I am pretty sure that it was offered up as a choice but was probably seen as too radical. Heaven forfend.  

No, red is the color of the Republican party. I don't think wearing any color would make one bit of difference. The Democrats need more than a color, they need defiance, courage and to keep the spotlight, in the shape of the media on them. I am just as disgusted by the like of MTG, Boebert and the rest of the R rabble but they get coverage. 

 

 

Edited by peacheslatour
  • Like 17
  • Useful 1
isalicat

isalicat

On 3/2/2025 at 2:37 PM, Annber03 said:

Can confirm. Family had to rely on food banks during some of our worst financial struggles and yeah, it is definitely not enough to live on. Not even close. The effort to help is wonderful, yes, but it's nowhere near enough. 

I just saw this. I don't know to which food bank you are referring, but the one I work at gives enough food for a 4-6 person family to live on for TWO weeks at a time and always includes eggs (we were able to give a full dozen to smaller families and a pack of 18 to larger families this last week) plus butter, milk (if wanted - and we always have oat or almond milk) and cheese plus a package of chicken/meat/fish plus a large bag of staples and another very large bag of fresh fruits and vegetables. We have food pantries/banks all around this area (central coastal California) so anyone can come to us and virtually the next day go to another place and get yet more food if they want. Totally enough!

  • Like 1
Yeah No

Yeah No

21 minutes ago, peacheslatour said:

No, red is the color of the Republican party. I don't think wearing any color would make one bit of difference. The Democrats need more than a color, they need defiance, courage and to keep the spotlight, in the shape of the media on them. I am just as disgusted by the like of MTG, Boebert and the rest of the R rabble but they get coverage. 

You're absolutely right. Democrats frustrate me no end, though. But pink? What a weak choice. They just come off as so weak, I am sorry to say. And it pains me to say that. Black is a power color too and would have made more of an impact but what do I know?

  • Like 6
  • Love 1
Yeah No

Yeah No

1 hour ago, Bliss said:

I did not write this... it was sent to me via email:

(to answer the question of 'why' is tRump Putin's puppet?)

Someday the true story of Donald Trump’s Russian connection will be told and it will read like a spy novel worthy of Tom Clancy…
It’s the story of a beauty pageant that led to the election of a President.
In 2013 Trump was beyond broke.  He was deeply in debt and after five bankruptcies, not a bank in America would lend him money. He did however still own the rights to the Miss Universe Contest and in November of that year he took the pageant to Moscow.
For a week Mr. Trump and a bevy of the most beautiful young women in the world partied with all the big wigs in Russia… politicos, oligarchs, rock stars, celebrities, even Vladimir Putin himself.
There has been much speculation about what went down in that week of booze, babes and big money, but whatever it was, it changed the course of history.
It’s common knowledge that every hotel room in Moscow is bugged and who knows what Mr. Putin’s KGB cameras might have picked up.  Trump, as a high profile visitor would be under constant surveillance.
The Miss Universe party ended and within weeks the Trump organization received a six hundred million dollar loan from Deutsche Bank… a German banking giant that had previously been convicted of illegally laundering money for the Russians.
Trump left Moscow with the financial backing he so desperately needed and Putin had his hooks in Trump.
In 2015 Trump announced his candidacy for POTUS and Putin began actively cultivating his asset.
The Mueller report states unequivocally that Russia conducted a systematic misinformation campaign designed to tarnish Trump’s opponents and promote his candidacy.
Russia’s influence in the 2016 election was pervasive and it worked…
With Putin’s help Donald J Trump became the 45th President of the United States and he wasted no time paying off his pal Vladimir…
Trump spoke glowingly of him every chance he got… every executive decision benefited Putin.
He ceded the middle east to Russia, withdrew from Syria and allowed Putin to fill the void.
He turned his back on Ukraine, the last bastion standing between Russia and a free Europe.
He disavowed NATO, the alliance that had held Russia at bay for over 70 years.
He pulled US troops out of Germany… something the Kremlin has always wanted.
At the Helsinki summit, Trump chose to publicly believe Putin over his own intelligence agencies.
He attacked America’s friends and embraced her enemies just like Putin wanted.
At home Trump became the “divider in chief” driving deep divisions between all the different factions of American society.
To divide America from within… to drive a wedge between blacks and whites, rich and poor, left and right, has long been a part of Putin’s KGB playbook.
Russian hackers are inflaming racial tensions across the country, infiltrating radical groups, political parties and planting disinformation on social media.
We can only hope that the US Intelligence Services are prepared to address these threats because obviously Mr. Trump isn’t. 

I have read and heard versions of this story going back years now but never one this cohesive and comprehensive. It rings true even based on facial expressions I saw Trump make in Putin's presence when he probably wasn't aware of it. Even before I heard these stories it came to me one day that Putin must have something on him to make him exhibit that body language. And everything Trump has done and said since then has only made me even more convinced of it. It wouldn't surprise me in the least if this is at least somewhat accurate.

  • Like 8
  • Love 1
Annber03

Annber03

27 minutes ago, isalicat said:

I just saw this. I don't know to which food bank you are referring, but the one I work at gives enough food for a 4-6 person family to live on for TWO weeks at a time and always includes eggs (we were able to give a full dozen to smaller families and a pack of 18 to larger families this last week) plus butter, milk (if wanted - and we always have oat or almond milk) and cheese plus a package of chicken/meat/fish plus a large bag of staples and another very large bag of fresh fruits and vegetables. We have food pantries/banks all around this area (central coastal California) so anyone can come to us and virtually the next day go to another place and get yet more food if they want. Totally enough!

I was living in South Dakota at the time we used ours, so there's that - California may well do things differently than other states do in that regard. I can't remember the names of the local food banks we used, but I do remember ours weren't nearly that detailed and full. 

Also, California is significantly bigger in terms of population, so they probably do have a lot more availability of that sort of thing. South Dakota's population is signfiicantly smaller. So food banks aren't going to be nearly as frequent and common as they might be elsewhere.

And two weeks' worth of food is great! But people who are financially struggling will need help a lot longer than that, and they shouldn't have to rely on food banks every couple weeks to get the basics. They should have a stable safety net to help them long-term, one that goes beyond individual charities'/food banks' generosity. 

3 hours ago, Dimity said:

No, because they don't like hypocrisy:

 

481685300_1110412794523627_4292134030706588353_n.jpg

To say nothing of the fact that his family took money from a children's cancer charity. 

  • Like 4
  • Angry 4
  • Fire 2
  • Applause 7
Milk-Eyed Mender

Milk-Eyed Mender

55 minutes ago, LexieLily said:

My greatest wish is that we could fast-forward four years when we are done with him.

His inauguration was a little more than six weeks ago; four years seems insurmountable, if not unsurvivable.  Russia God/ Mother Earth/ Kharma if you're listening....

I am a cradle to the grave Democrat and even I am aghast at my party's failure to rise to the moment. As a Minnesotan, I can only look longingly to the north and dream of an underground tunnel to Winnipeg. 

  • Like 10
  • Applause 2
  • Useful 1
  • LOL 2
  • Love 2
bluegirl147

bluegirl147

2 hours ago, Ohiopirate02 said:

I can believe a lot of this. Russians bugging hotel rooms is known as well as them using WiFi to spy on people. Donald may not drink, but is completely capable of falling into a honeypot. Honestly, the honeypot is designed to catch men like him.

It's got to be more than just him sleeping with someone. He's been caught cheating before.  It could be the golden shower story that has been going around for years.  If he was the one being showered he might think it makes him look weak. Or maybe he killed someone.  Or the Russians made it look like he did. 

  • Like 13
isalicat

isalicat

3 minutes ago, Annber03 said:

And two weeks' worth of food is great! But people who are financially struggling will need help a lot longer than that, and they shouldn't have to rely on food banks every couple weeks to get the basics. They should have a stable safety net to help them long-term, one that goes beyond individual charities'/food banks' generosity. 

Yes, a stable safety net that begins with employment and self-reliance. Assisting with housing in order to allow the earners in the household to be trained or gainfully employed is the first step, but ultimately unless people are permanently disabled to the point of not being able to work at all (and we have lots of clients at the food pantry that are), all assistance should be aimed at helping people get *off* assistance for a happier life. (and yes, we provide referrals to such services both in person and on our pantry website as a matter of course). We have clients that have been coming to the pantry for years and we are so pleased to serve them as we know they will never (for lots of valid reasons) be able to afford both rent/utilities and food...but the people that come to us for a few months and then report they don't need us anymore because they have landed a good job are the ones that are by far the happiest.

  • Like 4
LexieLily

LexieLily

41 minutes ago, bluegirl147 said:

It's got to be more than just him sleeping with someone. He's been caught cheating before.  It could be the golden shower story that has been going around for years.  If he was the one being showered he might think it makes him look weak. Or maybe he killed someone.  Or the Russians made it look like he did. 

What could Putin possibly have on him that would make MAGA/GOP turn on him after everything he's already done that they've made excuses for/refuse to believe? 

(...also, do I want to know what the golden shower story is? 🤔)

  • Like 3
  • Wink 1
  • Love 2
Notabug

Notabug

5 minutes ago, LexieLily said:

What could Putin possibly have on him that would make MAGA/GOP turn on him after everything he's already done that they've made excuses for/refuse to believe? 

(...also, do I want to know what the golden shower story is? 🤔)

It's pretty self-explanatory.  The story itself came from a guy named Christopher Steele who released a series of memos pertaining to Trump.  I've never heard that anyone has actually viewed the supposed tape of the incident.

https://mashable.com/article/donald-trump-pee-tape-golden-showers-explainer

3 minutes ago, Is Everyone Gone said:

So Amy Coney Barrett seems to be less MAGA-coded in her SCOTUS decisions ... Interesting.

Except when it comes to a woman's right to bodily autonomy.   

  • Like 7
LexieLily

LexieLily

3 minutes ago, Notabug said:

It's pretty self-explanatory.  The story itself came from a guy named Christopher Steele who released a series of memos pertaining to Trump.  I've never heard that anyone has actually viewed the supposed tape of the incident.

https://mashable.com/article/donald-trump-pee-tape-golden-showers-explainer

*runs as fast as I can to the vomit emoji*

  • Like 3
  • LOL 2
Is Everyone Gone

Is Everyone Gone

(edited)
21 minutes ago, Notabug said:

Except when it comes to a woman's right to bodily autonomy.   

Well ... yeah. But that kind of tracks with her extremely Catholic background. Very pro-life, but more liberal socially when it comes to other issues than the hard-core evangelical MAGA base.

Also, she doesn't really hang with the Alito/Gorusch/Kavanaugh/Thomas conservative motivational speaking circuit crew.

Edited by Is Everyone Gone
  • Like 1
  • Useful 3
Lantern7

Lantern7

2 hours ago, Kemper said:

Now this post is brilliant!

Aw, thank you! You know what would also work? Tomatoes. Has their price been jacked up in recent weeks?

I don’t know what Mother Russia would have on Trump, given that everyone has vivid imaginations these days. People could post suspicions as to what Putin has on the guy, and that would cover 95 percent of what could have happened. If it happened, of course. He could always be throwing us under the bus to impress Putin out of his own free will. That’s even more depressing than him being coerced.

  • Like 8
Yeah No

Yeah No

43 minutes ago, LexieLily said:

What could Putin possibly have on him that would make MAGA/GOP turn on him after everything he's already done that they've made excuses for/refuse to believe? 

(...also, do I want to know what the golden shower story is? 🤔)

I am absolutely convinced that nothing would make his base turn on him other than irrefutable proof of murder or child molestation. Pee tapes are victimless fetish stuff and they wouldn't care about that any more than they cared about Stormy Daniels and that was in some ways worse because it involved adultery. And they could always claim that any tapes presented were faked. For Trump himself to be worried enough about it to become Putin's puppet , it has to be really bad.

  • Like 6
Dimity

Dimity

(edited)
13 minutes ago, Lantern7 said:

He could always be throwing us under the bus to impress Putin out of his own free will. That’s even more depressing than him being coerced.

While nothing would surprise me about Trump this is where I land.  He admires dictators - he wants to be a dictator.  And he doesn't care about anyone or anything other than lining his own sleazy pockets. And of course the chronically indoctrinated have given him delusions of grandeur.

Edited by Dimity
  • Like 9
  • Useful 1
Absolom

Absolom

3 hours ago, Liddy52 said:

My mother passed away at around noon on January 31 of 2019. Social Security withdrew the entire January payment, from her checking account, even though she had lived all but 8 hours of January.  Not the February payment, the January payment.  And they had withdrawn it within two weeks of her death. I checked with Social Security and they verified that it was correct that they had taken all of her January payment even though she had been alive 99% of the month. My father in law passed away November 8 of 2018, and his entire payment for November was deducted from his checking account within a matter of weeks.  At least though, he had only lived 8 days of that month. 

This is true.  Callous maybe, but true.  One must live through the entire month to keep the payment for that month.  As I said before the payment for month x is made in the next month y.  In this case the check for January would have arrived in February.   

  • Like 2
  • Useful 3

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...