EyewatchTV211

Yes, I have even tried out some of Brandon's techniques on my own dog. Luckily at this point, she does not have severe issues. Unfortunately, his suggestions to keep dogs from picking up/eating things outside have not been effective with her, which is my biggest concern. She's an expert with the "leave it" command indoors, but as soon as we get outside and she finds something I can't even see hidden in the grass, I and any treats I have may as well not exist. I pretty much don't exist to her at all outside. Also really enjoying The Zoo. They seemed to be able to identify Dinky because they mentioned she was the smallest, I think. I guess if people get attached to one individual flamingo, they can find some sort of identifier with the one. Did they mention if any of the workers could identify multiple flamingos? I did feel for the mammal handler lady. Choosing to work with mammals and then unexpectedly having to work with a huge snake. Yikes! I would love to work with the gorillas or chimps or orangutans, but if I was then asked to work with a snake I would FLIP OUT. Not a fan.

We've talked about another show here, Lucky Dog, with the dog trainer Brandon McMillan. I read his book, and he actually disagrees with the philosophy that dogs need an alpha. I've seen other trainers who are against it as well. Basically, Brandon said dogs are not stupid enough to think that humans are another dog who is part of the pack and so are not really "alpha dogs." His belief system is that if you develop loving trust with the dog, the dog will be motivated to work for you. You'll still need to put in the work for consistent training, but you don't necessarily need to be an alpha to do that if the dog really trusts you.

I read in one of the articles that Kristen videotaped the other castmembers' reactions when they found out the twist. I'd LOVE to see this.

I see. I doubt he was content with it. But yes, he seems like the type who would not be able to stop himself from having what he wants.

I think locks of hair were actually a "thing" around this time period.

I thought Chris and Daniel were in their modern clothing originally (I remember thinking that would make them even more obvious) and then in the following scene they were dressed appropriately, so I figured they had gotten era appropriate clothing somewhere in between. I otherwise agree about the show. It had its moments, but there were also many I disliked. Not sure I'll be able to stick with the show, but I will give it a few more episodes.

Oh. I had assumed Love Blossoms WAS part of the Valentine's Day event. Now I'm trying to remember other individual movies from last year. Oh well. I'll just be happy to have something new after a few weeks with nothing.

I've been seeing previews for Campfire Kiss with Danica McKellar and Paul Greene. Looking forward to seeing the two of them. However, I'm confused about what this movie is part of. The Valentine's Day movies are clearly over, but they are advertising spring fling as starting April 1st. It isn't a mystery movie. Campfire Kiss is airing March 18th. I wonder what the plan was for the movie.

Has the second episode of The Zoo already aired? I went to set up my DVR to record tomorrow, and it is saying it is episode 3. Did they show the first 2 episodes back-to-back last time and I didn't realize?

I guess I'm just a history geek, then. While I enjoy Josh's personality, I'm always disappointed to see the Game Show/Extreme Moments/Unseen Footage episodes because I'd rather see a new investigation into a myth/legend/historical event or figure.

If it's a rom-com and not a mystery, I guess it's based on this possibly? http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/29342078-truly-madly-sweetly

Maybe Hawaa has it right after all, considering these looks http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/doughnut-dress-fashion-week_us_58ab0cd5e4b07602ad569b53?vxzuardh5srurqkt9

Sadly, yes http://healthypets.mercola.com/sites/healthypets/archive/2015/04/02/dog-breeds-1915-vs-2015.aspx I think someone originally posted this same link after last year's event.

I can attest to the first part of this. I wanted to return or exchange food for a different reason, and the person gave me a refund and told me to donate the food to a shelter. The 2nd part I have not experienced myself yet (thankfully - my girl is only 5), but I read about it somewhere else.

Agree with your first line. And so happy to see the correct usage of "couldn't care less," so thank you for that. :-)

I don't think the show itself is long and drawn out. He follows multiple leads throughout the episodes that I think fill them out pretty well. The problem is the million commercials make it drag out. I think the show would work better airing without commercials like the BBC shows, but unfortunately that is not how we roll here in the USA. I'll have to seek out Destination Truth. I don't think I've ever seen that show, but after googling it, it sounds like another one that I would like.

I should admit in advance that I haven't read any of the books or seen any of the movies. But I seem to have this fascination with reading what people think about pop culture like this, the Bachelor, etc. Anyway, I love Matt Bomer and was a huge fan of White Collar. Based on what I've read, he did sound like he would be perfect (although a little older). So I felt the need to google some pictures of him again. So pretty. I do watch a lot of the Hallmark movies and am a fan of Eric Johnson as well. Wish he'd be in more stuff that I watch.

I was trying to give this group of kids a chance, especially after I was surprisingly impressed with the dessert imposters. But I have to agree with everyone here that in every other episode, these kids on the whole have been unimpressive. They do not show any particular baking/decorating talents and should be doing much better on these simple challenges. This season has been highly disappointing.

Thanks for this! I have looked for a board on the show before but wasn't at the point of making one myself. He's definitely a fun and interesting guy.

I think she made similar comments when she was invited to tour a prison where the inmates trained shelter dogs. One of the inmates was working with a dog that sounded like it had that mental anguish, and the inmate was the only one the dog responded well to.

"Not all mail makes it to its intended recipient, so what happens to undeliverable mail? Several postal workers work as detectives to track down the people who never got letters and packages that were sent to them. The workers head out of their office to deliver mail that can save lives, solve crimes, reunite old loves and change futures. The group includes leader and charming postal detective Oliver O'Toole, technophile Shane McInerney, free-spirited Rita Haywith, and master researcher Norman Dorman. Together, they work to get the mail to its destination, and although late, in some respects it often gets there at just the right time." The first movie I absolutely LOVED. It went on to become a TV show for awhile, with 1 hour eps. Then it went back to being movies that aired less frequently. They're enjoyable, but the first is still my favorite.

Whether this will convince anyone will remain to be seen: http://ew.com/movies/2017/02/03/dogs-purpose-video-investigation Also, depending on where in the country you live, heartworm prevention.

I think this is a key point in why Chidi and Tahani are in the Bad Place, although many here don't think they are bad enough for that. If we can believe Janet, and it seems like we can......., a lot of people that we would consider amazingly good are in the Bad Place. Very few of the best are in the Good Place. Which again really fits with how none of these characters could have been in the Good Place. None of them are to the level of some of the greats Janet mentioned didn't make it.

I read an interview with Schur where he says season 2 will be completely different. So maybe they'll find a way to avoid the Groundhog Day thing. I enjoyed these two episodes and am eager for the show to come back (hopefully).

Yes. And many of the foods looked very close to what they were impersonating.