formerlyfreedom May 3, 2017 Share May 3, 2017 Political commentary from either The Last Word With Lawrence O'Donnell or any related PTV editorial piece is fine to be discussed in this forum. However, posts that contain personal political views are subject to moderation. This directive is purposely broad because anytime hard lines are drawn in the sand and/or examples are given, some will use it as an opportunity to walk too close to the line, or even put a toe over it. Please remember, mods are only human, and sometimes stuff will slip through the net. So if you see a post that violates the above, please do not respond - use the report button. If you have a question on any of this, please PM the forum moderator, @saoirse. Thanks. Link to comment
Hanahope May 12, 2017 Share May 12, 2017 I thought it was great to point out that even if trump doesn't have money invested in russian corps/business ventures that would show up on his taxes, that doesn't mean the opposite isn't true, that there isn't russian money invested in trump's businesses, which is probably more likely. 3 Link to comment
Moose135 May 12, 2017 Share May 12, 2017 38 minutes ago, Hanahope said: that doesn't mean the opposite isn't true, that there isn't russian money invested in trump's businesses, which is probably more likely. Considering either Urday and Qusay were talking a few years back about how much investment they get from Russia, that's much more likely. 1 Link to comment
Kitty Redstone May 13, 2017 Share May 13, 2017 Hannahope, I was just reading some stories on David Cay Johnston's DCReport and articles they link to on this very issue (there's a very good one on the american interest website). There has been lots of Russian money invested in the family businesses in the past, and then of course there's the shell corporation scheme used to hide the true sources of investment money. I've been mainlining news this week and don't remember where I saw the report, but journalists were able to finally track down Russian money given to Marine Le Pen's campaign back to an empty building outside of Moscow. It was one shell-corp owned shell-corp after another. This is exactly where these investigations are headed. Hopefully the documents that FinCen is handing over to the Senate intelligence committee will be the jolt that some of these people need, as clearly the full-on assault on our democratic institutions hasn't been enough to worry them. 2 Link to comment
car54 May 14, 2017 Share May 14, 2017 This article about Laurence's contract being up in 4 weeks and the network not opening negotiations is very disturbing. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/lawrence-odonnell-msnbc-future_us_59162d8ce4b00f308cf5534a?ncid=tweetlnkushpmg00000016§ion=politics 4 Link to comment
Medicine Crow May 14, 2017 Share May 14, 2017 They're certifiable if they let him go!!! 7 Link to comment
spiderpig May 14, 2017 Share May 14, 2017 I just came racing here to post. First Greta, then the rumored Hugh Hewitt. If they put Hewitt in Lawrence's slot, MSNBC is dead to me. 10 Link to comment
Medicine Crow May 14, 2017 Share May 14, 2017 I see Hugh Hewitt & I change the channel. Period!!! 8 Link to comment
slensam May 14, 2017 Share May 14, 2017 If they lose him this network is dead to me. They can't be this stupid? 4 Link to comment
Medicine Crow May 14, 2017 Share May 14, 2017 44 minutes ago, slensam said: If they lose him this network is dead to me. They can't be this stupid? I know how you feel, but there's still Rachel, Chris, Brian Williams & now Nicolle Wallace, so .... 1 Link to comment
HyeChaps May 14, 2017 Share May 14, 2017 Couldn't bear it if they replaced Lawrence with BW. 2 Link to comment
Kitty Redstone May 14, 2017 Share May 14, 2017 What is wrong with Lack? It would be so stupid to let Lawrence go. 8 Link to comment
lb60 May 15, 2017 Share May 15, 2017 Just read about this. I will be so upset (pissed!) if they let Lawrence go. Dumbass executives. 5 Link to comment
spiderpig May 15, 2017 Share May 15, 2017 If they're aiming for a younger target audience, maybe we'll see the noted political analyst Justin Bieber. Or Miley Cyrus, if Beebs has previous commitments. 3 Link to comment
Hanahope May 15, 2017 Share May 15, 2017 I'll still watch Rachel and Chris, but it will definitely cut down my viewing of MSNBC w/o Lawrence. I'd only watch his slot if he was replaced with another liberal, like Robert Reich or Keith Olberman. 4 Link to comment
spiderpig May 15, 2017 Share May 15, 2017 26 minutes ago, Hanahope said: I'll still watch Rachel and Chris, but it will definitely cut down my viewing of MSNBC w/o Lawrence. I'd only watch his slot if he was replaced with another liberal, like Robert Reich or Keith Olberman. Robert Reich would be brilliant. His sensitivities are laser sharp. I always look forward to his insight. Now, if they'd dump Greta, bring in Reich, and leave Lawrence alone. One can hope. 7 Link to comment
spiderpig May 15, 2017 Share May 15, 2017 Word from another site is that MSNBC and Comcast are being bombarded with protests over Lawrence's possible dismissal. One said MSNBC's Last Word voicemail was full. 2 Link to comment
car54 May 15, 2017 Share May 15, 2017 There are a number of movements to get Lawrence/TLW trending on Twitter during his show tonight. CALL 212-664-4444 Option 7 Email: Letters@MSNBC.com Link to comment
Macbeth May 16, 2017 Share May 16, 2017 Unfortunately what I read is that Comcast wants to court Republicans on issues like net neutrality - thus the change of on-air staff. So what little money (to them they are the evil empire) they can get from Lawrence is nothing compared how much money they can make by courting Republicans. 1 Link to comment
spiderpig May 16, 2017 Share May 16, 2017 Uh-oh. Lawrence is AWOL tonight. Ari's filling in. 1 Link to comment
lb60 May 16, 2017 Share May 16, 2017 23 minutes ago, spiderpig said: Uh-oh. Lawrence is AWOL tonight. Ari's filling in. Yeah, I was not happy to see that. Link to comment
car54 May 16, 2017 Share May 16, 2017 Another article about the behind the scenes at MSNBC http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2017/05/16/is-lawrence-o-donnell-facing-the-chop-at-msnbc?via=twitter_page Link to comment
alias1 May 16, 2017 Share May 16, 2017 I'm sick about this. How stupid can they be? I'm not that fond of Chris Hayes or Brian Williams. Rachel and Lawrence are the only shows I can't miss. If Lawrence is gone, I may stop watching Rachel too (in protest). Don Lemon, here I come! Link to comment
spiderpig May 17, 2017 Share May 17, 2017 (edited) It's official. He's cancelled. Per David Frum's Tweet: Reportedly O'Donnell's firing offense was being too critical of Trump: awkward for Comcast's other interests Hold the phone! Apparently Lawrence isn't fired. Yet. 1 hour ago, spiderpig said: Edited May 17, 2017 by spiderpig Link to comment
Tunia May 17, 2017 Share May 17, 2017 15 hours ago, spiderpig said: It's official. He's cancelled. Per David Frum's Tweet: Reportedly O'Donnell's firing offense was being too critical of Trump: awkward for Comcast's other interests *bolding mine It's not possible to BE too critical of Trump. Can MSNBC be so stupid as to let LOD go? 4 Link to comment
Moose135 May 17, 2017 Share May 17, 2017 29 minutes ago, Tunia said: Can MSNBC be so stupid as to let LOD go? Given some of the other changes they are making, I'd say the answer to you question is Yes. 3 Link to comment
Calvada May 18, 2017 Share May 18, 2017 Isn't this show one of their highest rated shows - second only to Rachel? Yeah, that makes sense, let's get rid of that guy. MSNBC's ratings have been through the roof with the election of Trump. Why do they want to screw that up? That said, I wouldn't mind saying farewell to Chris Hayes, move Rachel and Lawrence each up an hour, and then they can put BriWi on an hour earlier than he is now. This would mean I could get to bed earlier! 2 Link to comment
spiderpig May 18, 2017 Share May 18, 2017 Lawrence is on with no hint of any background drama. But who knows? If he leaves, he's free to text me anytime. 2 Link to comment
spiderpig May 18, 2017 Share May 18, 2017 Back Wednesday night like nothing happened. Anybody got an update? Link to comment
stormy May 18, 2017 Share May 18, 2017 This morning on her show, Stephanie Miller threw her support of Lawrence to her listeners. She's pretty pissed off that there's a chance Lawrence and MSNBC may not come to a contract agreement. His contract expires June 4th. Stephanie was unhappy saying that basically Chris Hayes, Rachel, Lawrence and Joy Reid make MSNBC worth watching. 4 Link to comment
Grommet May 18, 2017 Share May 18, 2017 Lawrence was my first TV boyfriend, waaaay back in 1992. I'll be very unhappy if he leaves. 2 Link to comment
car54 May 19, 2017 Share May 19, 2017 This does not sound good. https://heatst.com/entertainment/now-msnbcs-president-and-lawrence-odonnell-may-be-out-as-top-boss-sharpens-the-axe/ Link to comment
lb60 May 20, 2017 Share May 20, 2017 (edited) 1. Lawrence did not throw a public tantrum. Jackass writer. 2. No way in hell will I watch Brian Williams. And, I used to actually like him. 3. I've read that Rachel has said she will be out the door if Griffin is shown the door. 4. Why is this idiot in charge messing with success? I hope Lawrence is on tonight. I know he often times is off on Friday, but since he missed Monday, hope he will be on tonight. ETA: Yay! He's on. Edited May 20, 2017 by lb60 3 Link to comment
spiderpig May 20, 2017 Share May 20, 2017 Remember when the glory of cable was that people could find niche networks that catered to their interests (like Sci-Fi, Court TV, The Learning Channel) and then they cannibalized them into broadcasts having nothing to do with their original core audience. TLC (The Learning Channel)? SyFy (Sci-Fi Channel), TruTV (Court TV)? Wasn't AMC originally American Movie Classics? But they ran really crappy movies and as AMC have done some stellar shows, so I'll give them a pass. To keep this on topic, wasn't MSNBC programmed to counter Fox News and appeal to a different audience? We have our favorites like Lawrence, and now they have to mess with us. If they shut out Lawrence, where does he go? Cartoon Network? 3 Link to comment
Wings May 20, 2017 Share May 20, 2017 On 5/16/2017 at 11:37 PM, spiderpig said: Reportedly O'Donnell's firing offense was being too critical of Trump: awkward for Comcast's other interests This makes no sense. They would have to fire Rachael and Chris to name only two. ' What is happening to free speech? 2 Link to comment
spiderpig May 20, 2017 Share May 20, 2017 33 minutes ago, wings707 said: This makes no sense. They would have to fire Rachael and Chris to name only two. ' What is happening to free speech? I guess we'll have to wait on tenterhooks (go ahead and Google tenterhooks) until Monday to find out where we're headed. Lawrence is a smart guy, and I didn't detect any subliminal messages about an imminent departure, but who knows? Link to comment
Wings May 20, 2017 Share May 20, 2017 (edited) 13 minutes ago, spiderpig said: I guess we'll have to wait on tenterhooks (go ahead and Google tenterhooks) until Monday to find out where we're headed. Lawrence is a smart guy, and I didn't detect any subliminal messages about an imminent departure, but who knows? I am familiar with the word. :^) Lawrence's delivery is always calm and measured. In his soothing tweet, I read DOOM! The political climate drives me to this conclusion. Again I say WTF is going on? The right is taking over the airways. I have become twitchy and now store food under my bed. Edited May 20, 2017 by wings707 4 Link to comment
spiderpig May 21, 2017 Share May 21, 2017 Update Saturday night on Lawrence's contract negotiations: *****Lawrence O’Donnell Update: MSNBC is Finally Negotiating Due to Intense Fan Pressure***** http://reverbpress.com/news/lawrence-odonnell-update-msnbc-finally-negotiating-due-intense-fan-pressure/ 6 Link to comment
Wings May 21, 2017 Share May 21, 2017 Thank you for that. The bad news paragraph makes me think he may be offered a contract that he will not sign because there would be a clause limiting his criticism of Trump. It would not be that specific but something to rein in his criticism of the right. Link to comment
clb1016 May 21, 2017 Share May 21, 2017 He's on AM Joy right now. At least his colleagues are showing their support. 3 Link to comment
Wings May 21, 2017 Share May 21, 2017 34 minutes ago, clb1016 said: He's on AM Joy right now. At least his colleagues are showing their support. Unfortunately I tuned in half way through and still watching now. I missed it. Can you give some highlights, please? Link to comment
MrSmith May 21, 2017 Share May 21, 2017 On 5/20/2017 at 8:13 AM, wings707 said: I have become twitchy and now store food under my bed. I have a friend who's been preparing (and keeping prepared) for some kind of apocalyptic upheaval for at least 20 years. He has a whole plan: where to go, what to take, who's going, and so on, complete with rations and necessities stored up. I used to laugh at him a little bit. Now I'm starting to think he might well have the last laugh. Link to comment
Wings May 21, 2017 Share May 21, 2017 31 minutes ago, MrSmith said: I have a friend who's been preparing (and keeping prepared) for some kind of apocalyptic upheaval for at least 20 years. He has a whole plan: where to go, what to take, who's going, and so on, complete with rations and necessities stored up. I used to laugh at him a little bit. Now I'm starting to think he might well have the last laugh. I am too much of an optimist to entertain any thoughts of apocalypse. I have seen TV shows on Preppers. What a bizarre existence. My comment was humor which I am sure you got. ;^) 2 Link to comment
motorcitymom65 May 23, 2017 Share May 23, 2017 Ok, you guys have me all freaked out. The Last Word is my favorite. My husband, who is not even left-leaning, loves it and never misses it. I cannot understand what MSNBC can possibly be thinking. Link to comment
spiderpig May 23, 2017 Share May 23, 2017 Lawrence's tweet about why he wasn't on Monday night: My taped interview with @SenWarren pre-empted tonight for live coverage of Manchester tragedy. Will air tomorrow @TheLastWord or online. 1 Link to comment
Hanahope May 24, 2017 Share May 24, 2017 Ah got to see more of the testimony of Brennan, who refused to name specific people colluding with russians, only that there was information that needed to be investigated about the collusion. Good for Brennan to avoid being pinned down. They need to continue their investigation to see who specifically colluded and who knew/approved about the collusion at the time it ws happening. 1 Link to comment
TheGreenKnight May 24, 2017 Share May 24, 2017 I can't believe they'd get rid of O'Donnell and possibly Rachel Maddow (on top of refusing to give a show to someone fantastic like Joy Ann-Reid), but bring on people like Megyn Kelly/Greta. Something about this feels very unsettling. There's also lunacy happening over at Fox News behind-the-scenes from what I've read. I wonder if both stories are related somehow. 1 Link to comment
lb60 May 25, 2017 Share May 25, 2017 Son of a ......! I love Joy, and I like David Frum, but where the hell is Lawrence? ::pouts:: Link to comment
spiderpig May 25, 2017 Share May 25, 2017 49 minutes ago, lb60 said: Son of a ......! I love Joy, and I like David Frum, but where the hell is Lawrence? ::pouts:: Yeah. He's off. He's back! He's off. Color me suspicious. 1 Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.