Jump to content

Type keyword(s) to search

All Episodes Talk: All Rise


Message added by Meredith Quill

Community Manager Note

Official notice that the topic of Sean DeMarco is off limits. If you have 1-on-1 thoughts to complete please take it to PM with each other.

If you have questions, contact the forum moderator @PrincessPurrsALot.  Do not discuss this limit to this discussion in here. Doing so will result in a warning. 

 

  • Reply
  • Start Topic

Recommended Posts

This is revolting.    Idiot plaintiff leaves her dogs in her poorly fenced back yard for hours, neighbor's pit bulls kill one of the tiny dogs in the p.'s yard, or in the d.'s yard, and dog got tossed back.     Of course the d.'s pit that killed the little dog had a litter of puppies, so I guess they breed them constantly.       The dogs were in p.'s yard 9 months before, but fortunately the p.'s dogs weren't out at the time.    The defendant, and her lying stupid cousin are trying to claim the little dogs dug into the p.'s yard, and then the pits killed one of the tiny dogs, and no one can figure out where this happened?    The p. brought the ashes with her.     It looks like a joint fence to me, but the plaintiff keeps saying it wasn't her responsibility to fix the fence.     Another idiot dog owner.

The d.'s say their dog wouldn't fit through, but I could easily fit through the hole in the fence, and it wouldn't even be difficult, and I'm not small.     I hate the defendant, and the plaintiff, and think they're all garbage animal owners.      What do you want to bet the plaintiff still lets her dog out in the yard alone?  I bet the fence still isn't fixed either.       JJ tells plaintiff she's an irresponsible owner, and that's certainly true.    D. has to pay the vet bills, and cremation.    JJ also told d. to fix the fence, like that will ever happen.     D. was 'fostering' the dogs, but who 'fosters' two or more dogs for at least a year?  She claims they were her son's dog, but having his dogs is not fostering.    She also claims they have been 'rehomed', and I'm assuming that means to the son's breeding kennel where she's still popping out puppies for profit.  D. wasn't even supposed to have dogs according to the lease, and renter's insurance certainly didn't cover them.   

I wish JJ could get the little surviving dog a new home.   P. gets $2450 for vet bills, dog cost, and cremation.      I hate both sides in this case.   

Rerun-This is the loony mom who moved into the rental house room with her son who was starting college.    It may be an oldie, but I deserve this one after watching the previous idiots.  

Mother either lived on couches, or in son's room until they got evicted after three months.    Landlord/defendant says mommy gave son booze too, and he's 20.  How weird, son has bright pink hair, and it clashes with his Golden Girls Dorothy collection patterned flowered tunic top.      Landlord rents five rooms to college students, UC Berkeley.    There's one bed in son's room, and mom slept on mattress they brought with them from home.    When the son says the mom and the landlord hit it off, and said that's why mom stayed, I thought the landlord was going to wet his pants.    Rent was 1300 a month for one room!

 Landlord says mom put desk by front door, to 'monitor' things, and son and mom argued constantly.   Other tenants were creeped out by the weirdo mom's residence.     Dad came with son and mom, and Dad left the next day to go to Shanghai, and Mom never left.    The defendants claim Dad never left the country, and I don't see why they keep worry about it, unless Daddy isn't a resident yet, and might not be able to leave and return, or something similar?    Landlord says mom and son destroyed kitchen, and son's room,    Landlord offered her extra room for a few days at first, but she didn't do that, and wanted to stay on son's floor.    The loony plaintiffs want hotel costs, security deposit, illegal eviction, and stolen property.     The room pictures after they moved out are horrible, and there are a bunch of pictures of empty booze bottles.    Even the plaintiff's pictures are awful, and full of garbage in the room, and they left under the supervision of the police.    

Plaintiff gets nothing.   

Next rerun-woman rented house to defendant after she bought cheap and renovated, and claims the defendant trashed it.    D. claims no damage, but don't they all?        Defendant is blaming everything on the kids, I guess supervising kids, and teaching them how to behave is old fashioned.   The property manager calls the plaintiff, and tells her to come and look at the house.  There are pictures of crayon writing on the walls, and ceilings, but defendant says she supervised the kid.   That must be a super tall eight year old, she wrote on the ceiling, the blinds were trashed by the kid, and the wall crayon pictures aren't even the same colors, and obviously done over time.   

What a liar!   She's blaming a little kid for everything.  Property manager and contractor took pictures and did estimates of damages, including the kitchen cabinets that look like they used a flame thrower on the doors.   The place also had bed bugs, roaches, and mice, and needs heavy duty pest treatment.   

The landlord/plaintiff gets $5,000, and I added this to my list of reasons I will never be a landlord.    The funny thing is bad tenant, and her unsupervised hellions moved in with grandma, and she looks stunned at the damage, and claims this doesn't happen in her house, and I'm not believing that either. 

Edited by CrazyInAlabama
  • Love 5
Link to comment

After seeing the ^^^ above mentioned episode wth defendants kid writing on walls, destroying property etc. Defendent with speech impediment, cheap wig and braless (?)....good lord! Where does this species live? I hope it's far far away from the West coast.

  • Love 7
Link to comment
1 minute ago, chenoa333 said:

After seeing the ^^^ above mentioned episode wth defendants kid writing on walls, destroying property etc. Defendent with speech impediment, cheap wig and braless (?)....good lord! Where does this species live? I hope it's far far away from the West coast.

What?  What part of the country would you send her to?  Anyone living anywhere would protest "Not fair!!!!"  LOL.

  • Love 7
Link to comment
12 minutes ago, AZChristian said:

What?  What part of the country would you send her to?  Anyone living anywhere would protest "Not fair!!!!"  LOL.

Oh, perhaps a remote wilderness area where people go to find Bigfoot.

  • Love 3
Link to comment

I'm not sure, but I think the plaintiff owned the house in Cleveland, and then had a job transfer to Florida.     However, they didn't say where grandma lives, and I'm wondering if the daughter and kids are supposed to be living with her?   I'm guessing there are property managers all over the country trying to find out where grandma lives, and if the daughter, and grandkids moved in with her illegally, and how fast they can get them off their property.          

  • Love 2
Link to comment
28 minutes ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

I'm not sure, but I think the plaintiff Chad a job transfer to Florida.     However, they didn't say where grandma lives, and I'm wondering if the daughter and kids are supposed to be living with her?   I'm guessing there are property managers all over the country trying to find out where grandma lives, and if the daughter, and grandkids moved in with her illegally, and how fast they can get them off their property.          

Cleveland Ohio?!! i grew up in a town 25 miles from Cleveland (Aurora). SO glad I made the decision to move far, far away! 

  • Love 3
Link to comment

I think it was Cleveland, but I'm not positive.   I felt so sorry for the owner, she tried to fix the house, made it liveable, and that woman and her brats trashed it.     I'm glad she got the $5,000, but it's going to cost at least a $1,000 to get rid of the bed bugs, and other vermin.    Only specialists handle the bed bug issues, and it's not an easy fix.   I hope grandma realizes that since her daughter had bed bugs, that everything they brought into her house was infested too.   I wonder if grandma's neighbors knew about the pest ridden daughter, and her destructive kids were moving in with grandma, and bringing their little buggy friends too? 

 

If someone actually paid attention to where the trashed rental house was located, please correct me if I got it wrong, or confirm it if I got it right.  Thanks. 

 

Monday's rerun episode is supposed to be the thieving grandson who stole thousands in cash from dead grandpa's safe, and shared with his friend, and mom believed they earned it mowing lawns.      I guess coming on the show is the only money grandma will ever get back, and I'm sure it's only one of the thieving grandson's future thefts.   

Edited by CrazyInAlabama
  • Love 7
Link to comment
21 hours ago, chenoa333 said:

After seeing the ^^^ above mentioned episode wth defendants kid writing on walls, destroying property etc. Defendent with speech impediment, cheap wig and braless (?)....good lord!

One would think that viewing a repeat would lessen the horror it engenders. Not so. If anything, "Summer" was more horrific this time around. That house looked like wild animals had been living there, and I just can't imagine what made plaintiff think def. and her kids would be anything like ideal tenants. Sure, her kid wrote all over the walls, busted holes in them and the kitchen looks like it needs to be condemned (I swear I could smell the stink through my screen), but that's just Summer's idea of "normal wear and tear." I guess all the vermin she attracted with her filthy habits are normal, too.

 

22 hours ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

The funny thing is bad tenant, and her unsupervised hellions moved in with grandma, and she looks stunned at the damage, and claims this doesn't happen in her house, and I'm not believing that either. 

Maybe Momma lives in a pigsty as well, so isn't bothered by the destruction darling daughter and her unfortunate hellspawn leave in their wake.

22 hours ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

Rerun-This is the loony mom who moved into the rental house room with her son who was starting college. 

At least that was funny then, and is still funny now. Listening to the ridiculous crap from Dragon Mamma and her ball-less baby boy, and then hearing the facts from the def. make this a classic of some kind.

  • Love 5
Link to comment

I bet since there was a property manager, that the owner didn't get the tenant herself, but took the apparently lousy screening the property management company did. 

For example, I was in a rental house for three months, the company had a lot of rules, and did all appropriate background checks, and credit checks, and took pictures before move-in, and when we did the walk through when I moved back to my house.       They were very good, and had a great reputation.    

There was a house across the street, and down a couple of houses that they same company handled, the owner wanted over market price for it, so it had been empty for at least nine months.    After I moved back to my house I noticed that the house was rented, and to a lady who had a dog rescue decal on her back car window.      The property manager told me at my walk through that the lady wasn't doing rescue, and had a limit on the number of dogs she could have in the house.      The tenant lied, she was still running her phony rescue, had at least 10 dogs, and the dogs were barking constantly, and escaping, and I'm surprised none of them were run over.      The property manager was told by several people, including me, about the massive number of dogs, and that she was running a business out of the house, but did nothing.     

Even a good property manager can sometimes give in to the temptation to rent a property when it's been empty for a while, and shirk the background check to get the long distance owner happy about having the bills paid.      The end of the story is someone (bet you can guess who) called the business license man at City Hall, explained what was going on, and he confirmed no business license, or zoning, and he went down there that day with animal control.     She was about to leave anyway, and got rid of the dogs, probably selling them for what she paid for them, and that was nothing.     The house owners put it on the market, after they got the move out report, and had to fix a lot of damages over the security deposit.    It was all because the property manager didn't do her job, and a bad tenant took advantage of that, and because the owner lived far away and would never see the house.  

Edited by CrazyInAlabama
  • Love 5
Link to comment
1 hour ago, AngelaHunter said:

One would think that viewing a repeat would lessen the horror it engenders. Not so. If anything, "Summer" was more horrific this time around. That house looked like wild animals had been living there, and I just can't imagine what made plaintiff think def. and her kids would be anything like ideal tenants. Sure, her kid wrote all over the walls, busted holes in them and the kitchen looks like it needs to be condemned (I swear I could smell the stink through my screen), but that's just Summer's idea of "normal wear and tear." I guess all the vermin she attracted with her filthy habits are normal, too.

 

Maybe Momma lives in a pigsty as well, so isn't bothered by the destruction darling daughter and her unfortunate hellspawn leave in their wake.

At least that was funny then, and is still funny now. Listening to the ridiculous crap from Dragon Mamma and her ball-less baby boy, and then hearing the facts from the def. make this a classic of some kind.

This is an example of the future of our country. I know there are many good kids that are parented to grow intellectually, spiritually. To learn self respect and respect for all living beings. But where the hell are they? They are the new minority.  But at least they still exist! That rare breed!

  • Love 6
Link to comment
23 hours ago, chenoa333 said:

After seeing the ^^^ above mentioned episode wth defendants kid writing on walls, destroying property etc. Defendent with speech impediment, cheap wig and braless (?)....good lord! Where does this species live? I hope it's far far away from the West coast.

An eight-year-old writing on walls repeatedly? The defendant said she "put her on punishment" each time the child wrote on walls, but what sort of punishment was it if the kid kept writing on walls time and time again after being caught and "put on punishment"?  Did they punish her by sitting her in time-out in front of a DVD player with Good & Plentys and Raisinets to eat while she watched a video of her own choosing during her time out?  In whatever manner the kid was punished, it must not have been unpleasant to be so ineffective. And why in the world is any eight-year-old writing on walls? If she's neuro-typical, it's not remotely an age-appropriate behavior. My three-year-olds aren't especially compliant compared to other children I've been around, but they know that bad things happen when people write on walls, furniture, or any other surfaces not intended for writing or drawing. I would never do it, but I could probably leave a room with my two three-year-olds and an open package of permanent markers in all sorts of exciting colors and come back to find the markers untouched.   If the defendant's eight-year-old child has a disability that impairs her judgment to the degree that she considers writing on walls to be an acceptable practice, she needs to be monitored far more closely than is currently happening.

  • Love 7
Link to comment
31 minutes ago, SRTouch said:

Well, here's 10 options:

I vote for:

4. The Johnston Atoll. In 1963, Johnson Island was declared a place to conduct nuclear testing if necessary. In 1993, though, it was deemed as a place to store and destroy chemical weapons.

Maybe there Summer and her brood can't torture anyone else and all that nuclear residue might kill her roaches and bedbugs. She can take her ghastly mother with her too.

1 hour ago, jilliannatalia said:

An eight-year-old writing on walls repeatedly?

Well, look at who bred her. Poor kid has no chance at anything resembling a normal life.

Edited by AngelaHunter
  • Love 5
Link to comment
1 hour ago, AngelaHunter said:

d her brood can't torture anyone else and all that nuclear residue might kill her roaches and bedbugs.

Sadly, cockroaches are the most likely to survive radiation, they are resistant and they reproduce at great rates so that the non productive mutations die off immediately but the undamaged DNA off spring survive. However, if the result is super cockroaches surviving and  Summer's gene pool comes to an end, this is win for the human race.

  • Love 4
Link to comment
On 10/5/2018 at 3:59 PM, CrazyInAlabama said:

 The defendant, and her lying stupid cousin are trying to claim the little dogs dug into the p.'s yard, and then the pits killed one of the tiny dogs, and no one can figure out where this happened?  

What I couldn't get past was the Defendant's dress. She had a mustard yellow jacket on over a sheer black dress - *very* sheer. I noticed it when she was behind the desk, but when she moved off to the side as the cousin came up, you could see the entire side of her stomach/crotch through the sheer fabric. Missing either a mirror or modesty!

  • Love 5
Link to comment

I'm sure the yellow jacket was a modesty device by the production crew when they saw the sheer dress.    Just like the fresh out to f the package oversized shirts many litigants wear, and you know they showed up in low riding tank tops, or cleavage that goes all the way to the table.       I can't imagine JJ seeing some litigant in see through clothes, and her reaction to the production people that didn't do anything about that.      Another idiot who thinks being on TV for any reason means that some agent will see her, and cast her in reality TV projects and make her a star.

One of the crayon pictures had drawings on the ceiling.    There must have been bunk beds or something.   I didn't catch the ceiling notation until the rerun, and was even more disgusted than in the first viewing.    My guess is the only disability the kid has is that their mother prefers to have fun, and ignore raising her own kid, or kids.   I wonder if grandma fainted when she found out how much bed bug removal is, and how much work it is.    

Forget Johnson Atoll, last I heard there was a large group of people who live and work there for the government.     

Edited by CrazyInAlabama
  • Love 4
Link to comment
17 hours ago, AngelaHunter said:

One would think that viewing a repeat would lessen the horror it engenders. Not so. If anything, "Summer" was more horrific this time around. That house looked like wild animals had been living there, and I just can't imagine what made plaintiff think def. and her kids would be anything like ideal tenants. Sure, her kid wrote all over the walls, busted holes in them and the kitchen looks like it needs to be condemned (I swear I could smell the stink through my screen), but that's just Summer's idea of "normal wear and tear." I guess all the vermin she attracted with her filthy habits are normal, too

What slayed me was her affect.  Nose stuck up in the air, proudly displaying those nasty teef like the Queen of All She Surveyed.  Ugh.

I know some people make good money in the rental game,  I just don't know how.

  • Love 4
Link to comment
42 minutes ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

 I wonder if grandma fainted when she found out how much bed bug removal is, and how much work it is.    

It's my understanding (I still have PTSD from watching "Hoarders") that there are people who cohabit with armies of roaches and bedbugs and just view them as a fact of life, kind of like the way I am annoyed but resigned that it takes a long time for the water to run hot from my kitchen faucet. Summer would probably have continued to live with them had she not been kicked out by the horrified house owner.

  • Love 5
Link to comment
55 minutes ago, AngelaHunter said:

(I still have PTSD from watching "Hoarders")

Hey, if you give me a little cut I'll fill out your disability paper ?.... but you'll have to give me a couple hundred up front... ??

  • Love 7
Link to comment
4 hours ago, SRTouch said:

Hey, if you give me a little cut I'll fill out your disability paper ?.... but you'll have to give me a couple hundred up front... ??

Angela Hunter will give you a couple hundred when she gets her tax efund, and not a moment sooner. And if you do anything to p!$$ her off, she will stop payment on the check before you cash it.

Edited by jilliannatalia
  • Love 3
Link to comment
5 hours ago, AngelaHunter said:

It's my understanding (I still have PTSD from watching "Hoarders") that there are people who cohabit with armies of roaches and bedbugs and just view them as a fact of life, kind of like the way I am annoyed but resigned that it takes a long time for the water to run hot from my kitchen faucet. Summer would probably have continued to live with them had she not been kicked out by the horrified house owner.

I could never watch Hoarders for that reason. When it first came on, I thought I would enjoy watching people who just never throw stuff away (I have a sibling like that but not filth! She just can't part with anything...) and it never occurred to me that there would be bugs. I absolutely have PTSD from the first show I saw that had bugs. I never watched again and am itchy typing this.

  • Love 2
Link to comment
1 hour ago, jilliannatalia said:

Angela Hunter will give you a couple hundred when she gets her tax efund, and not a moment sooner. And if you do anything to p!$$ her off, she will stop payment on the check before you cash it.

Then I'll sue for pain and suffering, emotional and distress, missed work, harrassment and maybe even defamation!!! I figure her not paying me a couple hundred is bound to be worth 5 grand.

  • Love 4
Link to comment
22 hours ago, chenoa333 said:

This is an example of the future of our country. I know there are many good kids that are parented to grow intellectually, spiritually. To learn self respect and respect for all living beings. But where the hell are they? They are the new minority.  But at least they still exist! That rare breed!

We just don't see them because they don't bring the drama.  The good people are still out there, and I choose to believe (I have to believe) that they outnumber the idiots we see on JJ.

  • Love 12
Link to comment
2 hours ago, configdotsys said:

I could never watch Hoarders for that reason. When it first came on, I thought I would enjoy watching people who just never throw stuff away

Same. My sister-in-law keeps all manner of things, but they're neatly stacked up, clean and no bugs (still drives my brother nuts). After a few eps of Hoarders, I was horrified and so sickened I gave up on it. The last straw was seeing professional exterminators literally running away from a zillion cockroaches that flowed like a waterfall from an opened, infested fridge, ripping off their suits as they went. While this scene went on, the hoarder stood outside, discussing nail polish with someone.

Neither JJ nor JM seem to know about hoarding and don't recognize it in litigants, but maybe they have better things to do than watch outrageous, sensationalistic reality TV which makes money from exploiting the mental illnesses of people. Other than court shows, reality TV has been off my menu for years.

  • Love 6
Link to comment

Another reason I could never tolerate being a landlord is hoarders.    After watching the hoarder shows, and reading Matt Paxton's book, I've learned 1 in 25 homes are hoards, and that includes rentals, and condos/townhouses/apartments too.     Since hoarding is classified under OCD in the mental illness diagnosis manuals, I'm figuring that getting a hoarder out of your property would be very difficult.   

The landlady this week was lucky that the loser woman and her hellions left when they did, because some places it takes up to a year to get rid of a deadbeat tenant.     The resale market where the rental house is must be in the toilet, because I can't believe a sane person would fix that house up and re-rent unless they couldn't sell it.  I would fire the property managers too, since they either did a bad job on credit and reference checks just to get a paying tenant in the house, or faked the background checks and never did one.  

There have been so many litigants who were evicted, or moved on their own, that leave appalling amounts of garbage behind.       I still remember the people who had a bunch of big dogs, and the dogs weren't on the lease, or maybe one was and they added a bunch more, and all used the house interior for potty breaks.   They had quite a few extra 'visitors' who stayed a long time, and when they moved out the house was trashed.    Even JJ couldn't believe the excuses the former tenant made about the dogs, and garbage.   

In the dragon mommy case, the son and mom certainly destroyed his room, and the kitchen, and the landlord still had to evict them.    The excuses, and denial of former tenants like this is just amazing, but so is the look on JJ and Byrd's faces when the pictures are shown.    

I bet the woman who let her kid or kids destroy the house can't find anyone to rent to her again, and grandma finds out that letting her daughter move in was a big mistake.     

Edited by CrazyInAlabama
  • Love 5
Link to comment
3 hours ago, SRTouch said:

Then I'll sue for pain and suffering, emotional and distress, missed work, harrassment and maybe even defamation!!! I figure her not paying me a couple hundred is bound to be worth 5 grand.

I'm disappointed, SR Touch. We've all been conditioned quite thoroughly to understand that the only person who suffers emotional distress is Judge Judy.  *

 

*Byrd's tax dollars may be applied toward the support of  scads of adults and their children who are the result of sperm producers/egg donors/human incubators who had nothing more productive to do with their time than to have sex because  they don't need to work due to the government offering them permanent financial support because of ADHD//OCD/ODD/CD/DMDD/STD/and God only knows what else (and then they are bequeathed additional $$$ from Byrd beyond the customary Aid to Families with Dependent Children because the offspring resulting from too much time on their hands and nothing to do with the time other than the Humpty Dance have disabilities that qualify their parents for the serious funding) but even Byrd doesn't suffer true emotional distress. Only JJ does.

  • Love 8
Link to comment
4 hours ago, AuntiePam said:

We just don't see them because they don't bring the drama.  The good people are still out there, and I choose to believe (I have to believe) that they outnumber the idiots we see on JJ.

That's the frightening thing.  The dysfunctional are breeding at a more rapid rate than are the functional. We'll soon reach critical mass if we haven't already done so.  We would be in dire straits even sooner if it were not for a small segment of our population with some education and work ethic (my husband's entire Latter-Day Saint family excluding him falls into this category) weren't having a minimum of six kids each. They and others like them will kick in enough tax dollars to keep the sinking ship off the bottom of the ocean for another generation or so, but the ship will inevitably sink sooner or later unless the people who don't need to work because we're all already supporting them discover some effective  form of birth control.

 

Edited by jilliannatalia
  • Love 5
Link to comment
1 hour ago, jilliannatalia said:

That's the frightening thing.  The dysfunctional are breeding at a more rapid rate than are the functional.

And to think I laughed at the prologue in "Idiocracy" when it came out. Not so funny now.

2 hours ago, jilliannatalia said:

Byrd's tax dollars may be applied toward the support of  scads of adults and their children who are the result of sperm producers/egg donors/human incubators who had nothing more productive to do with their time than to have sex because  they don't need to work due to the government offering them permanent financial support

People who wonder about Byrd's oft-glum demeanor, his reluctant sauntering over to litigants, snatching of documents and his eye-rolling as he peruses the illiterate/fake/dumb bullshit upon them need to consider that he has reason to be grumpy, which, btw, is just the way I like him.

  • Love 8
Link to comment
15 minutes ago, AngelaHunter said:

which, btw, is just the way I like him.

Me too. He's a grumpy old guy who will do the job, like the elderly retired cop with only a hand gun who took down two terrorists each with a semi-auto rifle in Austin. If I was being attcked Byrd would be my choice of bailiffs to protect me. Most of the bailiffs we see on court shows don't look capable of going hands on with a threat; I know that the lady bailiff on Hot Bench is a real bailiff but her standing with her ankles crossed in a model pose tells me that she can't respond quickly to a threat.

  • Love 5
Link to comment
1 minute ago, DoctorK said:

If I was being attcked Byrd would be my choice of bailiffs to protect me.

Absolutely. He may not do pirouettes around the courtroom like Douglas on TPC, charm everyone or pose like a model (although Sonia is the real deal too), but if you need someone to CYA or put the smackdown on idiotic litigants, Byrd is The Man.

  • Love 3
Link to comment
1 hour ago, AngelaHunter said:

Absolutely. He may not do pirouettes around the courtroom like Douglas on TPC, charm everyone or pose like a model (although Sonia is the real deal too), but if you need someone to CYA or put the smackdown on idiotic litigants, Byrd is The Man.

Yep - Byrd may be doing his crosswords - but when a litigant starts to get riled up, Byrd is already stepping in... still remember the time MM was shouting "Security, Security!"

  • Love 4
Link to comment
6 hours ago, AngelaHunter said:

Absolutely. He may not do pirouettes around the courtroom like Douglas on TPC, charm everyone or pose like a model (although Sonia is the real deal too), but if you need someone to CYA or put the smackdown on idiotic litigants, Byrd is The Man.

Byrd is full of awesomeness. He could probably have his own show, though I'm not sure what the premise would be. I liked the bailiffs Judge Alex had [back in the day] as well.

Edited by jilliannatalia
to add a thought; I'm still an abysmal typist, but I managed not to commit any typos in this brief posting
  • Love 4
Link to comment

Just saw a show where the grandmother was suing her grandchildren's dad over clothing.  The mom and kids lived with her, dad had shared custody.  She bought the kids around 1k in clothing, said she'd drop them off with 'nice' clothing, and they'd return with 'bad' clothing.  The one kid was 15 (not sure if one or more grandkid).  She said she ironed the clothing before it was worn to school, she'd done that with her own kids.

Grandma, the kid is ditching the clothing.  No teenager has ironed clothes.  I drive by schools on my way to/from work.  It's all jeans, distressed looking clothing for the most part.  Why didn't she ask the 15 year old where the clothes ended up?  He didn't want to wear the stuff.  JJ told her to mind her own business, the clothing was a gift, she couldn't sue the dad.  The mom sat there and didn't say one word.  Yeah, Grandma rules that roost.

Not sure why JJ didn't as if Grandma had asked the 15 year old where the clothing was.  Bet he knew where all of his electronic devices and accessories were.  

  • Love 7
Link to comment
11 hours ago, SRTouch said:

Yep - Byrd may be doing his crosswords - but when a litigant starts to get riled up, Byrd is already stepping in... still remember the time MM was shouting "Security, Security!"

I wonder exactly how much Byrd gets paid to be on the show.

  • Love 2
Link to comment

This show would not be the same without Byrd. No BS with him. He stands there and listens to what's being said, does his crossword, saunters over to the table when JJ asks him to pick up a document or photos. Doesn't act or put on a show. Keeps order in the courtroom. At the end of a case I like to watch how he goes to the gate and lets the litigants exit one by one. I notice that if it's been a particularly contentious case he stands between the plaintiff and defendants and has them leave separately so as not to engage in any verbal back and forth. I like his no nonsense attitude and JJ does too. I'm sure she hand picked him as her baileff.

Edited by Matty
  • Love 13
Link to comment
1 minute ago, Matty said:

I'm sure she hand picked him as her bailiff.

Byrd had been a real-life bailiff for Judge Judy back in her family court days.  He moved on to another job since then, but when he saw she was offered a TV show, Byrd sent her a letter of congratulations and added,  "If you need a bailiff, by old uniform still fits."

The rest is history.

  • Love 13
Link to comment

Okay that's great... blame the owner of the SAFE who puts money in her own safe, NOT your dear darling boy who STOLE $3000!

ETA:  And neither one of these stellar youths looked even a little ashamed. :(

Edited by Brattinella
  • Love 9
Link to comment

The thieves weren't ashamed, and the parents still didn't care about what they did.   When the idiot d. mommy says her son showed her the $2,000, and she believed he earned it, and she let him go shopping.      The parents are definitely the reason the son and his idiot friend thought stealing thousands from the grandmother was just peachy.     Who keeps 15k is cash in the house?  Even in a safe that's stupid.   I bet the idiot grandson never paid a penny back, and never will.    I hope the grandmother realizes that saying how much cash she has in her house, and that the safe is portable is an open invitation to every thief in town to drop in, and I bet she's related to a bunch of them too.  

The grandmother p. is just as stupid as the parents, and the grandson, and his idiot friend.    They just came on this show is to get the $5,000 if they could, too bad idiot grandson remembered how much money he gave his fellow criminal, so they only gave them $3k.  

The new case of the squatter did have significance for me, because the defendant Michelle Dominick looked quite a bit like someone I worked with a long time ago by the same name.    That was weird.      I don't know why they kept calling her a previous tenant, because she still left her stuff there, and the dogs, and had no intention of moving out, or paying rent.    Another scammer who plays the system.   

The tree guy was stupid, but I bet he thought JJ wouldn't notice the deck rail.   However, I wouldn't call that siding, so I'm wondering what was really going with that boring case.   

Edited by CrazyInAlabama
  • Love 3
Link to comment

Minnesota Clemenson the tree trimmer and P.I. who apparently does "investigatin' " on the side - what an utter, lyin',  arrogant, meat-headed asshole. First of all, I've had quite a number of really big trees taken down, and never EVER would the company I use just cut down a tree that size at the bottom of the trunk and let it fall! OMG. They start at the top and cut it safely one section at a time so they have control. Plaintiff is very lucky it missed landing on the house. No way can Clem have a license and he has the gall to give plaintiff the brush off along with a pack of lies, hoping he'd just go away. Shameless, he is.

  • Love 10
Link to comment
39 minutes ago, AngelaHunter said:

Minnesota Clemenson the tree trimmer and P.I. who apparently does "investigatin' " on the side - what an utter, lyin',  arrogant, meat-headed asshole. First of all, I've had quite a number of really big trees taken down, and never EVER would the company I use just cut down a tree that size at the bottom of the trunk and let it fall! OMG. They start at the top and cut it safely one section at a time so they have control. Plaintiff is very lucky it missed landing on the house. No way can Clem have a license and he has the gall to give plaintiff the brush off along with a pack of lies, hoping he'd just go away. Shameless, he is.

He was disgustipating, I tell ya!

  • Love 6
Link to comment

My guess is he's the only defendant we've seen all week with a driver's license, and he thinks that means he's licensed for everything.       I've never seen a tree that big taken down like that, outside of a documentary about lumberjacks, and they were in the middle of the forest, not someone's backyard.    I wonder if the authorities in Minnesota are reviewing their records to see what kind of license that fool has, before he kills someone.    I'm guessing his investigations aren't licensed either.  

Edited by CrazyInAlabama
  • Love 8
Link to comment
On 10/5/2018 at 6:59 PM, CrazyInAlabama said:

 I hate the defendant, and the plaintiff, and think they're all garbage animal owners.     

This is on the pitbull eats yorkie fence case.  I so agree.  Both were reprehensible pet owners...to the point that I feel like the P needed to have some responsibility for the death (i.e. less money from Judes).  You left your dog outside for the day...in a place where the pitbulls had gotten into before.  And the only thing keeping them out was some scotch taped board?

  • Love 4
Link to comment

And Joshua's daddy bought both of their ties too.

So Joshua's daddy knows everything, and didn't live there.    I think the defendant/landlord felt sorry for man baby Joshua, when he carved up the kitchen, and but was crazy for not calling the police, and getting him ousted immediately.    Joshua seems like a bunny boiler to me, and his father obviously thinks if he tosses enough money at Joshua, he won't move home to the basement someday, but he's dead wrong.  .      So man baby Joshua moved because he couldn't drive, and had an accident?     How nice that daddy found him another place to live, and I bet he walks to school now too.   

JJ gave man baby Joshua his security deposit back, $400+, so next time the idiot landlord will call the police on nutcase roommates.   He's lucky Joshua moved out, and didn't take a knife to him in the middle of the night.  

Corvette and Abandoned dogs-They were together for six years?    What an interesting couple.     Looking the in mirror at the d. would make me depressed too.   He left the dogs behind because he was depressed?     Not a reason.     And the D. buys vehicles off craigslist, or picks up abandoned vehicles on the street and never register them?      What a couple of losers.        D. gave a corvette to the p., for her birthday, and then 'stole' it.    Apparently it's some kind of salvage title scenario.   The corvette was broken, has no title, and is still sitting on her property, so maybe she has a different definition of stolen than I do.   I hate both of these people, because my guess is their appearance on here was nominated by the p., to get money to fix the corvette.  

American Bullie, and Cane Corso?   Those are the dogs he abandoned, and I can see why the landlords aren't signing up for him as a tenant with his dog.   Ending, no money, and get out of my face.

P. can't have car in her name, so they broke the law and put it in the D.'s name.   Plaintiff, bought a car anyway, put it in defendant's name, and plaintiff drives it anyway, and isn't on the insurance policy.     Bet it's the usual story, another person with no license, no insurance, and no brains.  The defendant is obviously stupid too, because I bet every insurance agent in the country is searching her name in their data bases to cancel her policy, which means the registration will be suspended, and the police will be pulling the car over very soon.   The plaintiff's grandson drove the car too, got pulled over, and the car was impounded.    Then the defendant got the car out of impound, because it was legally hers, sold it, and the plaintiff wants her money back on the car.     

I hate everyone in this case, including the grandson, and I bet he doesn't have a license either.   Defendant, and plaintiff are lucky they didn't have Byrd after them with the Fly Swatter of Justice.

Rerun-Former guy d. sued by p. for pictures she did of d., and wasn't credited on the liner notes.   I hate the p. who says the d. wasn't out yet, and she just outed her on national TV.   Nothing but a cheap bid for the plaintiff to get publicity for her artwork, and it's all ugly.  

Rerun-As is horse sale, and plaintiff thinks she could get a refund.  Not happening.   No pre-purchase exam, aka vet check.    The only reason the d.'s might want to buy the horse back is the plaintiff is probably not going to care about the horse, and I bet either the daughter lost interest, or didn't have a clue about riding, and the horse is now having behavior issues, or they injured him in some way.   I bet the woman who evaluated the horse before purchase is in big trouble with the plaintiff.      Poor horse.  

 

Because of the hurricane, and the possible cable or power outages, someone please do a dynamite recap of tomorrow's new episode with another idiot doing a naked selfie, and her hubby sent it to his ex-gf, and the wife was fine with that.   Must be friends with the ones on the rerun last week with the sex videos sent to the ex and the current gf was fine with that too. 

The following rerun tomorrow (at least according to my less than accurate cable guide) case of the little dog getting severely injured was too sad the first time.   So tomorrow's rerun is another sad dog case, that viewers might want to skip.

Edited by CrazyInAlabama
  • Love 7
Link to comment
1 hour ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

And Joshua's daddy bought both of their ties too.

So Joshua's daddy knows everything, and didn't live there.    I think the defendant/landlord felt sorry for man baby Joshua, when he carved up the kitchen, and he was crazy for not calling the police, and getting him ousted immediately.    Joshua seems like a bunny boiler to me, and his father obviously thinks if he tosses enough money at Joshua, he won't move home to the basement someday, but he's dead wrong.  .      So man baby Joshua moved because he couldn't drive, and had an accident?     How nice that daddy found him another place to live, and I bet he walks to school now too.   

JJ gave man baby Joshua his security deposit back, $400+, so next time the idiot landlord will call the police on nutcase roommates.   He's lucky Joshua moved out, and didn't take a knife to him in the middle of the night.  

Corvette and Abandoned dogs-They were together for six years?    What an interesting couple.     Looking the in mirror at the d. would make me depressed too.   He left the dogs behind because he was depressed?     Not a reason.     And the D. buys vehicles off craigslist, or picks up abandoned vehicles on the street and never register them?      What a couple of losers.        D. gave a corvette to the p., for her birthday, and then 'stole' it.    Apparently it's some kind of salvage title scenario.   The corvette was broken, has no title, and is still sitting on her property, so maybe she has a different definition of stolen than I do.   I hate both of these people, because my guess is their appearance on here was nominated by the p., to get money to fix the corvette.  

American Bullie, and Cane Corso?   Those are the dogs he abandoned, and I can see why the landlords aren't signing up for him as a tenant with his dog.   Ending, no money, and get out of my face.

P. can't have car in her name, so they broke the law and put it in the D.'s name.   Plaintiff, bought a car anyway, put it in defendant's name, and plaintiff drives it anyway, and isn't on the insurance policy.     Bet it's the usual story, another person with no license, no insurance, and no brains.  The defendant is obviously stupid too, because I bet every insurance agent in the country is searching her name in their data bases to cancel her policy, which means the registration will be suspended, and the police will be pulling the car over very soon.   The plaintiff's grandson drove the car too, got pulled over, and the car was impounded.    Then the defendant got the car out of impound, because it was legally hers, sold it, and the plaintiff wants her money back on the car.     

I hate everyone in this case, including the grandson.   Defendant, and plaintiff are lucky they didn't have Byrd after them with the Fly Swatter of Justice.

Rerun-Former guy d. sued by p. for pictures she did of d., and wasn't credited on the liner notes.   I hate the p. who says the d. wasn't out yet, and she just outed her on national TV.   Nothing but a cheap bid for the plaintiff to get publicity for her artwork, and it's all ugly.  

Rerun-As is horse sale, and plaintiff thinks she could get a refund.  Not happening.   No pre-purchase exam, aka vet check.    The only reason the d.'s might want to buy the horse back is the plaintiff is probably not going to care about the horse, and I bet either the daughter lost interest, or didn't have a clue about riding, and the horse is now having behavior issues, or they injured him in some way.   I bet the woman who evaluated the horse before purchase is in big trouble with the plaintiff.      Poor horse.  

 

Because of the hurricane, and the possible cable or power outages, someone please do a dynamite recap of tomorrow's new episode with another idiot doing a naked selfie, and her hubby sent it to his ex-gf, and the wife was fine with that.   Must be friends with the ones on the rerun last week with the sex videos sent to the ex and the current gf was fine with that too.  However, the following case of the little dog getting severely injured was too sad the first time. 

Oh shit! I am SO looking forward to that episode. And let me guess.....the woman whose nude pics were posted on social media, is a fugly, used up trash bag!

  • Love 4
Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...