Jump to content

Type keyword(s) to search

Jill, Derick & the Kids: Moving On!!


Recommended Posts

14 hours ago, Notabug said:

The liability coverage is for the car, regardless of who is driving it and should cover to the extent of the policy

Allowing an unlicensed driver to operate the vehicle is a policy breach. If the owner didn't allow the operation then there is also no coverage because it was being driven without the owner's consent. 

  • Like 2
  • Mind Blown 1
  • Useful 2
(edited)
7 hours ago, Quof said:

Allowing an unlicensed driver to operate the vehicle is a policy breach. If the owner didn't allow the operation then there is also no coverage because it was being driven without the owner's consent. 

So, the victim is penalized because the car's owner was negligent?  Doesn't seem fair to me.

Of course, it is quite likely that Jill and Derrick have coverage for uninsured motorists, but still seems wrong.

Edited by Notabug
  • Like 6

I’m not a fan of chiropractors. I’ve known people who swear by it, and I’ve also known people who have had damage from it. I stick to regular MDs.
 

Talk typing tends to add unnecessary commas all the time. Sometimes I go back and look and sometimes I don’t. Maybe Derrick just did a quick talk type and it ended up that way. 

  • Like 5
  • Useful 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...