Jump to content

Type keyword(s) to search

Little House On The Prairie - General Discussion


Message added by Mod-LunarJester,

Culture Check: How can we empower each other with specific, constructive feedback? How can we redirect our focus towards actions, not individuals, and tackle passive-aggressive behavior by encouraging direct, respectful communication?

Check our guide on healthy debates for more info.

  • Reply
  • Start Topic

Recommended Posts

@Debranran,

I'm a bit confused by your latest post. When you said you loved Miss MacGregor's back story and how ' it affected her with her daughter', I take it you mean how Miss MacGregor's real life back story affected how she portrayed Harriet as she related with her character's daughter Nellie- insasmuch as Miss MacGregor hahad no children despite having had two brief marriages. Yes, I agree that it was interesting to have found out that Harriet herself had had 'a small mercantile' when she'd met Nels who'd been [naturally]'smitten with' her but her having the enterprise 'helped make the marriage happen'. Nellie (and Harriet) were REALLY lucky Nellie got Percival who insisted on himself and Nellie running the hotel as a team instead of bossing Nellie and taking advantage of legally owning the hotel entirely in his own name upon the marriage!

Link to comment

I'm sorry, should have read it over to make it clearer but I meant her character and I shifted from the real person of Richard Bull. I realize she didn't have children.

Yes Percival was funny and if they wanted, as I alluded too, to send Nellie to a women's college or teaching school, she'd be fine and probably find the one guy who isn't well off and fall in love but she did fine in WG. I wish they had them on more. The restaurant gift from someone who didn't cook and her mom didn't cook just seemed silly to me. My mom cooked but if she did that to me, they better like 3 meals and be happy. lol

I read many times by Allison if wasn't 100% her choice to go, they wanted everyone to keep same pay all the years it was on. “The network refused all requests from my agent for raises, extra episodes, or any type of concession he suggested, no matter how small,” she recalled. “Their offer was four years, same money, same conditions – take it or leave it.”

I'd leave it too but sad the repercussion was a quick goodbye, Nancy and one return with a very bad wig. : (

  • Like 1
Link to comment

I agree! It would have been MUCH better had the show focused on the Olesons and Daltons/Cohens with their growing family instead of Laura treated Zaldamo like a log bump - not unlike Pa wound up treating Ma in the last years!

  • Like 1
  • Applause 1
Link to comment
On 3/26/2023 at 12:57 PM, Blergh said:

I believe at the time, he was mad at NBC for cancelling LHOTP in the middle of the season and wanted to punish them via preventing the usage of the sets for any of their future productions.

However, it wasn't too much later that he put Highway to Heaven on the same network!

Does this mean that when Highway to Heaven shot, every set was new or on location since Michael Landon didn't believe in re-using sets? I seriously do wonder.

At the very least, the costumes survived. Supposedly when they were getting ready to film Dr. Quinn, they looked into the archives but allegedly the costumer said, "Get this 70's polyester crap out of here! Jane Seymour isn't going to wear this!" lol

  • LOL 3
Link to comment
On 9/19/2023 at 11:14 PM, methodwriter85 said:

Does this mean that when Highway to Heaven shot, every set was new or on location since Michael Landon didn't believe in re-using sets? I seriously do wonder.

At the very least, the costumes survived. Supposedly when they were getting ready to film Dr. Quinn, they looked into the archives but allegedly the costumer said, "Get this 70's polyester crap out of here! Jane Seymour isn't going to wear this!" lol

Since not only ML himself but also Victor French starred in it- and Richard Bull as well as Moses Gunn guested on it, I guess it has enough LHOTP alums check it out. Anyway, as per wiki, it seems that HtH mostly shot on location with only a few indoor sets but I'm not sure how many (besides Jonathan's car) were permanent ones. As per AA, they didn't wear '70's polyester' on LHOTP but  actual woolen clothes which she said would quickly become quite rank- despite the fact that the cast bathed daily (unlike 'Saturday night baths were a luxury' for pioneers)!

Of course, Charlotte Stewart admitted that she herself went commando beneath Miss Beadle's skirts which only the most destitute of women would do back then.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
1 hour ago, Blergh said:

actual woolen clothes which she said would quickly become quite rank

The Downton Abbey cast has also commented that their costumes, many of which were not reproductions and were clothes from the time period, smelled pretty bad too. 

Edited by Zella
  • Like 1
  • Useful 1
Link to comment
On 9/21/2023 at 10:07 PM, Zella said:

The Downton Abbey cast has also commented that their costumes, many of which were not reproductions and were clothes from the time period, smelled pretty bad too. 

And keep in mind that their characters' RL counterparts lived rather sedate lives of constantly going to banquets, teas and the occasional ballroom dance compared to the RL Ingalls who'd have literally earned every morsel of food by sweat! Also, the wealthier (or with access to more funds) a woman was, the more times she'd have had her entire outfit changed on a DAILY basis whereas servants and pioneers would wear the very same clothes (and underwear) day-in/day-out sometimes for weeks and months AND the laboring classes sweated far more yet had far less access to bathing than their wealthy counterparts!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
4 hours ago, Blergh said:

And keep in mind that their characters' RL counterparts lived rather sedate lives of constantly going to banquets, teas and the occasional ballroom dance compared to the RL Ingalls who'd have literally earned every morsel of food by sweat! Also, the wealthier (or with access to more funds) a woman was, the more times she'd have had her entire outfit changed on a DAILY basis whereas servants and pioneers would wear the very same clothes (and underwear) day-in/day-out sometimes for weeks and months AND the laboring classes sweated far more yet had far less access to bathing than their wealthy counterparts!

So true...LHOP was as Karen put it, a "sanitized" pioneer show where even the hands and nails had to be shown neat and clean and everyone smelled nice most of the time and changed clothes etc. When people would say "I wish I lived with them, she knew they meant "on the set" and not back then. One day of freezing cold temps, bathroom out of the house, no way to really wash your clothes adequately and just the drudgery of everything taking so much longer, they'd grow disenchanted. Now I'd love to visit the Ingall's where breakfast is done at sunrise, coffee always on and no one but Carrie ever used the outhouse. You can be be literally buried in snow and be fine. : )

  • Like 3
Link to comment
1 hour ago, debraran said:

So true...LHOP was as Karen put it, a "sanitized" pioneer show where even the hands and nails had to be shown neat and clean and everyone smelled nice most of the time and changed clothes etc. When people would say "I wish I lived with them, she knew they meant "on the set" and not back then. One day of freezing cold temps, bathroom out of the house, no way to really wash your clothes adequately and just the drudgery of everything taking so much longer, they'd grow disenchanted. Now I'd love to visit the Ingall's where breakfast is done at sunrise, coffee always on and no one but Carrie ever used the outhouse. You can be be literally buried in snow and be fine. : )

It wasn't the only series that sanitized things. Even when The Waltons was at its grittiest trying to show the struggles of a large family working together to survive the Depression, while John, Grandpa and the kids were depicted as sweaty, dirty and even in patched clothes, neither Olivia or Grandma were ever seen so much with a hair out of place or with a smudged apron despite the two women having to constantly  feed, clothe and clean  their household of eleven!

Edited by Blergh
  • Like 3
Link to comment
2 hours ago, Blergh said:

It wasn't the only series that sanitized things. Even when The Waltons was at its grittiest trying to show the struggles of a large family working together to survive the Depression, while John, Grandpa and the kids were depicted as sweaty, dirty and even in patched clothes, neither Olivia or Grandma were ever seen so much with a hair out of place or with a smudged apron despite the two women having to constantly  feed, clothe and clean  their household of eleven!

True, re the guys, I appreciated how authentic and grubby they were and the kids were normal to me, disheveled at times, clothes not perfect in fit, hand-me-downs, hair looked cut at home. : )  Going to church was the fancier outfits.

I would have my hair falling out of bun, sweating in the heat, cuticles cracked, wrinkles etched in face from trying to feed so many and sew their clothes! I did appreciate from what I could remember, they showed actual cooking at times and the food was good. The actress who played Mary Ellen did a video on the dinner scenes. Their stove did work but they brought in some of course.

I realize with all the talk of outhouses once on forum, no one did go to the bathroom at all. No child but Carrie,not Charles and Caroline, no diapers changed. I guess bodily functions unless vomited narcotics were not "family friendly". ; )

  • Like 3
Link to comment

Cozi TV played the pilot episode yesterday and Harvest of Friends was on today.

Every single time I see this episode I think why were there like 20 guys hanging around town, all ready to help when the "wee ones" were not up to the task? Didn't they have farms to work or something? For all those referred to men working at the sawmill, we almost never saw anyone besides Hanson, Charles and Charles's BFF of whatever season.

 

 

  • Like 1
  • LOL 1
Link to comment
19 hours ago, crazy8s said:

Every single time I see this episode I think why were there like 20 guys hanging around town, all ready to help when the "wee ones" were not up to the task? Didn't they have farms to work or something?

While I always wonder why they were just standing around watching UNTIL the "wee ones" tried to help.  I mean, really, who stands there watching an obviously not well man try to stack things as entertainment?  I mean, they were under no obligation to help, but at least walk off like you have something better to do.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
6 hours ago, Katy M said:

While I always wonder why they were just standing around watching UNTIL the "wee ones" tried to help.  I mean, really, who stands there watching an obviously not well man try to stack things as entertainment?  I mean, they were under no obligation to help, but at least walk off like you have something better to do.

Yes, I know Mike wanted effect by pausing it, but who would watch little kids lifting heavy bags...I was expecting Charles to start yelling, "Did everyone lose their muscle?| I can't afford to have halfpint pull a muscle or get hurt". It was so nasty for an established merchant in WG to do that. Didn't he read the bylaws??

  • Like 2
Link to comment
On 10/4/2023 at 4:43 PM, debraran said:

Yes, I know Mike wanted effect by pausing it, but who would watch little kids lifting heavy bags...I was expecting Charles to start yelling, "Did everyone lose their muscle?| I can't afford to have halfpint pull a muscle or get hurt". It was so nasty for an established merchant in WG to do that. Didn't he read the bylaws??

I suppose the idea was that seeing the small girls struggle to carry their father's load was more shame-inducing for the grown men than just watching the kite-injured grown man stranger hauling the heavy sacks  solo. Then,too, that grain merchant (Liam O'Neil played by Ramon Bieri) seemed to have amscrayed out of WG almost immediately after that episode so I guess he was  run out of town for attempting to insist Charles actually fulfill the contract he'd agreed to.

Edited by Blergh
  • Like 3
Link to comment
6 hours ago, Blergh said:

I suppose the idea was that seeing the small girls struggle to carry their father's load was more shame-inducing for the grown men than just watching the kite-injured grown man stranger carrying them solo. Then,too, that grain merchant (Liam O'Neil played by Ramon Bieri) seemed to have amscrayed out of WG almost immediately after that episode so I guess he was  run out of town for attempting to insist Charles actually fulfill the contract he'd agreed to.

Well, it's hard to conduct business with Charles "cash on the barrel" unless he wanted something, Ingall's .  : )

That was my only real pet peeve with the show, they never had Charles have a good year while others in WG seemed fine (except when they all moved) Jonathan was even getting a telephone for a bit. lol They didn't pay mortgage, electricity, cable, doctor bills were minimal unless someone got kicked in the gut by horse. They didn't need to be rich but just show them having something for all the work he did. Laura never struggled like that, Mary and Adam seemed okay, poor Caroline, had to have rumors of infidelity to get some nice but used dishes, that she never used. lol I always said she sold them to get something else. 

Charles was so talented, he farmed well (thats maybe questionable) did mill work, he could make things, craft furniture, do woodwork, do high risk jobs etc. Make some extra money. |Caroline had to work at home, clean, sew, make meals, tend her garden, wash clothes and then work in a restaurant and take care of so many kids you brought home...she deserves the medal.

 

  • Like 3
  • LOL 1
Link to comment

I remember y'all talking about that episode before I got to it. And all the snark I'd read still didn't adequately prepare me for when I first saw it. I was thinking "Surely it couldn't be as ridiculous as they're letting on." I was wrong, you were all right, and it was. 😂😂😂😂

Edited by Zella
  • Like 1
  • LOL 5
Link to comment

Yet, I'm sure that future pioneers/archeologists who'd have come across this structure would have most likely considered it a failed chimney and wondered why the builder would have opted to put a wooden lightning rod instead of a metal one atop it. That is if it didn't just crumble into a pile of rubble after the first big storm came through.

  • LOL 2
Link to comment

I watched that episode once, but I cannot watch it again.  It is just too ridiculous even for Little House.  Seeing the pictures and reading the comments helps me to realize I'm not missing anything by not watching it.  

  • Like 2
  • Applause 1
  • Love 1
Link to comment

It is completely over the top, but I'll watch it. I'll take it over any Nancy, Carters or Shannen Doherty episode. The first part is ok as a TV revenge Western episode. The second half has been discussed here over and over, but I'm still up to make fun of it at any time. 

If you want to talk over the top, I'm watching Albert kick morFEEN right now. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
7 minutes ago, Superclam said:

Now we have "Laura's Baby Dies" followed by a Carter episode, followed by "For the Love of Blanche."

Someone telling me it's time to stop watching TV? 

Nothing To See Here GIF by Giphy QA

  • Like 1
  • LOL 2
Link to comment
2 hours ago, Egg McMuffin said:

Re: the men in town for not helping Charles. Who are we to judge the mores of the 19th century, while we sit in our BarcaLoungers eating spicy curly fries?

Well, they'd have had straight fried potato wedges with just salt and eaten them at their dinner tables instead of their lounge chairs- but they'd have been more ready to hoist a sack of grain than modern TV viewers.

Edited by Blergh
  • Like 2
Link to comment

I remember in the books the kids loving the pigs tail. I guess like our bacon, which sounded good. I don't think it was ever in the show. Or the pig’s bladder can be blown up to make a nice balloon. They had mainly turkey roasts. I pretty much gave up pork, once in a while but it did look good.

27539972_1811176922227825_19217296740162

Link to comment
On 10/9/2023 at 12:15 PM, Superclam said:

Now I want roast pork. :(

Perhaps you should surf here AFTER you've eaten a large meal!

Amazing how many large meals got served in Casa Ingalls- despite there being no refrigerator to store anything or even any kind of pantry or storage area depicted!

  • Wink 2
Link to comment
8 hours ago, Blergh said:

Perhaps you should surf here AFTER you've eaten a large meal!

Amazing how many large meals got served in Casa Ingalls- despite there being no refrigerator to store anything or even any kind of pantry or storage area depicted. 
 

And perfect every time. ;)   Never saw dishes washed. I want that kitchen!

  • LOL 1
Link to comment
5 hours ago, debraran said:

And perfect every time. ;)   Never saw dishes washed. I want that kitchen!

Would you have been willing to let your minor child trade one of the family horses to a mean child to have gotten it?

  • LOL 1
Link to comment
8 hours ago, Blergh said:

Would you have been willing to let your minor child trade one of the family horses to a mean child to have gotten it?

On No!! I meant the seamless cleanup. lol. I am in the minority for real, that is what ruins the Xmas show for me. I didn't think a child that young could barter with an adult (sorry Nels, you are almost perfect but not this time) and the chaos to get it back, silly, because we can't make Nellie like animals or Laura have a bad decision. Her dad could have bought the stove and Laura bartered by working or whatever, something else special, but alas I know I'm in minority. Just didn't like it.

I realize though though you are jesting and I had a visceral reaction to something "sweet".  😉

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
17 hours ago, debraran said:

On No!! I meant the seamless cleanup. lol. I am in the minority for real, that is what ruins the Xmas show for me. I didn't think a child that young could barter with an adult (sorry Nels, you are almost perfect but not this time) and the chaos to get it back, silly, because we can't make Nellie like animals or Laura have a bad decision. Her dad could have bought the stove and Laura bartered by working or whatever, something else special, but alas I know I'm in minority. Just didn't like it.

I realize though though you are jesting and I had a visceral reaction to something "sweet".  😉

 

Yes, I agree that the whole storyline of the grown man merchant Nels letting Laura trade in Charles's horse to Nellie for the stove (instead of, at the very least, telling Laura that he'd have to clear it with Charles) was preposterous and annoying.

However, on a . . jesting note I can't help but think you'd at least have been momentarily tempted to have allowed your [hypothetical] kid render the above transaction if it meant that you got a wood burning stove that never needed to have its chimney or base swept out- much less needed any wood placed into it to work and somehow this included having no dishes to wash (since the Widow Thurman's never were seen again after Charles did chores[and batted his eyes] for them and only in the Big Bad Cities of Winoka and Rochester did dishes require washing).

  • LOL 1
Link to comment

Yes, you nailed it. 😄

And knowing Charles wanted to buy his wife a stove like an "adult" he gives him a catalog picture and doesn't tell him his very minor daughter is giving him her horse for the stove. It wasn't HIS gift. Even if he mentioned working on the saddle, he would have kept mum I bet.  Totally ludicrous. Poor Caroline never got anything really for Xmas, things were made for Charles, it was her only big gift in 20 years. Even the dishes were not to be. Tin plates, same clothes, 50 kids in a room, but never broke her.

In the "bad " city though, their home was lovely. I saw scenes with Caroline on the phone (gasp) talking to a relative, and it seemed very nice and although we never saw the little ones, with all the rooms maybe they were lost. lol.

Edited by debraran
  • Like 2
Link to comment

Yes, his presence was enough, I'm sure that extra money for the stove got spent somewhere else. Charles got many gifts, remember the pajamas and hat and shirt and scarf and mittens, but Ma? Even Carrie got a toy Laura made I think but Uncle Chris make her a nice wooden one when he saw she was left out during his visit. Another one who never really had a birthday on LHOP. I  never saw a gift of cloth doll, rocking horse etc. We saw one birthday cake Ma got when they made a mess they couldn't clean up yet but more were made for others. She was just the silent,"it's not about me" wife/mother. 

For whatever reason when they were ridiculously snowed in , there were gifts galore for everyone, store bought gifts, I remember being  distracted by it. But again, Charles knew what was in his because he "peeked" but what did Caroline get???

Edited by debraran
  • Like 3
Link to comment
3 hours ago, jason88cubs said:

I wish they had a set time with how long it took to get to Walnut Grove from their house, seem liked it would change base on situation

Well, it would definitely take longer in 2 feet or more of snow than in clear weather.  Also walking with Carrie when she was little would take much longer.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
On 10/19/2023 at 3:20 PM, Katy M said:

Well, it would definitely take longer in 2 feet or more of snow than in clear weather.  Also walking with Carrie when she was little would take much longer.

I meant sometimes it seemed like it was a short walk, sometimes it seemed like it was miles away depending on the episode even if the weather was fine

  • Like 2
Link to comment

It was odd that sometimes it seemed like a short walk over a single hill from Casa Ingalls to Downtown Walnut Grove while other times it seemed a wagon ride of roughly an hour was required!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
On 10/26/2023 at 7:26 AM, Superclam said:

I was watching an ep the other day ("The Inheritance") and they said the Ingalls farm was 3 miles from the Oleson's store. Of course, this show is not know for its consistency. 

I always thought it was about 2 or 3 miles. That's an hour leisurely walk, 20-30 minute speed walk, 15 minutes for a kid to run. Not too long if they hook up the horse and wagon.  I can't recall any episodes (besides the blizzard, where it makes sense) that it seemed like it was far away.

  • Like 1
Link to comment

He also had them take other routes home from school, not the road. They would go by creeks and other homes, etc. If they took just the road home, I doubt they'd get into so much mischief. ; )

Edited by debraran
  • Like 1
Link to comment
7 hours ago, debraran said:

He also had them take other routes home from school, not the road. They would go by creeks and other homes, etc. If they took just the road home, I doubt they'd get into so much mischief. ; )

Not to mention, that they would have been able to have gotten started on their homework and [non-existent] chores straight away! LOL

  • Like 1
Link to comment
2 hours ago, Blergh said:

Not to mention, that they would have been able to have gotten started on their homework and [non-existent] chores straight away! LOL

Yes, you rarely saw chores being done, just promises to do them or Laura saying she'd do Mary's to get her to do something else. They did fish and pick berries (which also got them in trouble) and Laura met older men but the hard things like laundry and dishes and peeling potatoes, no. I guess they couldn't have a show if everyone was as  busy as a real pioneer family. Unlike the poor chap who got beaten like he killed someone for being late for his chores (which was Albert's fault) for talking him into staying longer. He never had to do anything either. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...