All Episodes Talk: All Rise

[CrazyInAlabama]

4 p.m. reruns-

First (2018)-

Snowmobile Rooftop Whammy-Plaintiff Jeff Seward is suing former tenant's friend/defendant Hunter Kinchy, for damaging his vacation rental home (near Saginaw Bay, Michigan), when defendant rode his snowmobile over the roof, treating the home like a jump.    Plaintiff rented the house to one man, and four friends.   

Plaintiff claims defendant rode snowmobile down the hill, used roof of house as a mogul jump, and landed on the roof.    Defendant claims anything could have hurt the roof.   This was the second day of the trip, and a lot of adult beverages were involved.   Defendant claims another man also used the roof as a snowmobile mogul.    Plaintiff has photos of the cracked drywall roof, and an inspector's report, plus photos.   

Defendant is stupid enough to bring a video of his destruction of the property.   The defendant's stupid defense is that there is nothing warning him to stay off of the roof, and it's not in the contract.  Defendant also claims that he didn't hurt the roof.   Defendant's group was the second group of renters ever, and between the first and second group, plaintiff's wife painted a couple of walls, and part of the ceiling, and there were no cracks then.   (I'm not an engineer, but the weight of the snowmobile isn't just 350, plus the rider, and fuel.   It's also the extra force from launching using the roof to get off the ground, and the force and momentum of slamming down on the roof).

 $2508 for plaintiff, and defendant is told to sue his buddy for the other half.  

$5,000 for a $10 haircut-Plaintiff Carlos Campos (I typed his last name as compost, Freudian slip?) suing hair stylist/defendant Airiel Marie for cutting his hair too short (he's a lawyer).   Yes, plaintiff thinks his $10 haircut being too short should result in $5,000 to him. 

 Plaintiff claims the woman shaved (it's a buzz cut) his head, it is very short.   It took almost a month for his hair to grow back to the length it is now.  This man is whining about a month to grow his hair out?    

Plaintiff gets his $10 back.   

Second (2018)-

Childhood Friend Feud! -Plaintiff Wynette Freeman suing defendant Zahraw Al-Amin for repossessing the car defendant sold to plaintiff by taking over the payments.     Defendant 'sold' car to plaintiff for paying car payments, and insurance on car.   However, defendant was two months behind on payments, when she transferred the car to plaintiff, which amounted to owing $1200.   Plaintiff took the Greyhound bus to defendant's house, and took the car.  Registration on car was long expired too.    Defendant claims the car was current on registration, and insurance, and defendant repossessed the car, after 3 1/2 weeks, and car is now parked at defendant's father's place in Georgia (I hope the car company watched this and repo'd the car).       

Plaintiff paid car up until May, and the back payments, then defendant repo'd the car.      So, the payments by plaintiff totaled $2300, but defendant claims plaintiff had payments cancelled by bank.    However, JJ has a statement that plaintiff cancelled the $2300 worth of payments.   

Plaintiff says she's nervous, and JJ says "I only consume litigants on Thursdays, and this is only Wednesday".  

Plaintiff did cancel the payments, so she lied to the court.

Plaintiff case dismissed.   

Gun Pawning Dilemma! -Plaintiff Jeffrey Augustadt, and fiance Destiney Thurston suing defendant/mother Elizabeth Thurston, and are suing for illegal eviction, stolen tax refund, and stolen guns.  Plaintiffs were living with defendant. for about three years, mother and daughter argued, and plaintiffs left because defendant told them to get out.     Defendant wants a rifle and shotgun back that he says plaintiff kept.    Plaintiff man says defendant swiped his tax refund too.    One gun was purchased for them by a neighbor, and they paid for it, because defendant is a convicted felon (my guess), and can't legally own a gun.   

Illegal eviction dismissed.    Plaintiff man wants his personal belongings, and the two guns back.   JJ asks where the two guns are, and defendant says she pawned them, and then the guns were put into evidence by the police, but case was dropped.  Defendant isn't allowed to have firearms (guessing convicted felon?).   

Tax money coming up, plaintiffs work, but defendant never has.    Plaintiff man was paying $300 a month to the household, for room rent, and utilities.    Plaintiff claimed defendant's two children on his tax return, and received $1700 refund, because defendant doesn't work, so can't file for her own two children.     The scam was that in return for plaintiff filing for defendant's two kids, he would give her $1,000.   A total scam, and the IRS caught on, and audited, and took the money back.    (I'm wondering how many other people have claimed the defendant's kids to qualify as head of household, and get a bigger refund?    I felt so sorry for the daughter, she just wanted a mother, and never will have one). 

Case dismissed. 

5 p.m. reruns-

First (2021)-

Dueling Restraining Orders? -Plaintiff /landlord Stephen Pisani suing defendant /ex-tenant Ashley Scott for unpaid rent, attorney's fees, and damages.    Defendant is counter claiming for property missing while she was incarcerated (for probation violation for injury to a child, and drug paraphernalia was also found)..   Plaintiff claims while defendant was incarcerated, that a stranger moved into the condo.   Defendant was on probation for ”injury to a child”.   

Plaintiff has six rental properties, five in Lewiston, Idaho.   Defendant didn't pay rent in January, and February of 2021, but had property in the condo for both months.    Plaintiff decided to repair the condo, and then sell it.   

Defendant had an order of protection on her ex-husband, but he was regularly visiting the condo, so he had the door code.  Ex-husband had a restraining order against defendant at the same time.    

Arrest in December was over defendant violating the order of protection on husband, and drug paraphernalia, and a probation violation for Injury to a Child.   Probation for defendant on charges is for seven years. 

Plaintiff gets $2500 rent.   $1000 was the security deposit, and plaintiff kept $800, and plaintiff shows there were other damages.   Defendant claims after jail, she tried to clean up.    Plaintiff had to fix the outlet covers, because defendant put little lights on them, and painted them all red. 

Plaintiff claims defendant replaced the lock to a code lock to VRBO the property.  There are quite a few damages.  Of course, JJ discounts items that are obvious damages to new items.  Amazing that defendant claims she didn't know the illegal tenant, but has a power of attorney from him (that's affidavit you idiot), not admitted in evidence anyway.   Airbnb wouldn't let defendant rent property to visitors because she's a convicted felon.  

$1950 to plaintiff for unpaid rent, plus legal fees of $1657, total is $3607.   (I would have given the plaintiff/landlord every penny he asked for.  The defendant shouldn't have received anything back.  Another case that makes me wonder why a landlord comes on a TV judge show?   I haven't found a TV judge that isn't anti-landlord, and also hates people who sell at a profit.  I hate that someone injured a child so badly that she has a felony conviction and seven years probation for it, received a penny from the show).      

Second -

Death Threats, Lockouts and Restraining Orders?  Oh My! (2021) -Plaintiff/nephew Khalil McKinney suing defendant/aunt Lynette Perdue for illegal eviction, false restraining order applications, moving costs, and claims aunt made death threats against him.    Defendant says plaintiff threatened to kill her, she lives in fear of him, and applying for a restraining order was her only option.  Nephew, his girlfriend, and nephew's child (girlfriend is not the child's mother) moved into aunt's place, for $200 a month rent.   

They moved in December of 2019, from mommy's house.   Defendant is plaintiff's maternal aunt.     Nephew moved in right before New Year’s, and would pay $200 a month rent, and food stamps given for plaintiff, girlfriend, and child.   Nephew claims aunt complained about messy bedroom, coming home in the late night, food taken to nephew's room.   

On January 1st, 2020 plaintiff moved out with girlfriend, because he says his aunt threatened to burn nephew and girlfriend alive in their sleep in the bedroom.   Nephew claims aunt told him he was unwanted starting in October 2020.   Nephew claims he paid October and November 2020 rent.   Aunt gave notice on 15 October 2020, he stayed past 15 November, but didn't move everything out until 1 January 2021.  

Plaintiff claims aunt said he could stay without paying rent until he got his life together.  Plaintiff now pays $1250 a month rent, lives with girlfriend, and sometimes the child.  Defendant says she filed for the restraining order after plaintiff was belligerent to her, threatening her, and she felt unsafe in her own home.  

Plaintiff claims to have a police report for 1 January, and 4 January.  4 January was a police escort to get his stuff out.   

Plaintiff case dismissed, and plaintiff is stunned.    Plaintiff is fake sobbing in the hall-terview. 

Granny or Nanny? (2014) -Plaintiff/grandmother Lynnmarie Johnson suing defendant/daughter Elesia Howard, for child care fees, and lost wages.   Plaintiff was babysitting her daughter's children.   Grandmother says daughter didn't pay for childcare, claiming daughter said she was broke, but still bought weaves, and wigs, and other luxury items.  Daughter has one child.  Plaintiff says she babysat for the one granddaughter, and says daughter was to fill out paperwork to get state babysitting payment.  Since daughter didn't fill out paperwork correctly, it was rejected, so plaintiff was never paid.   Plaintiff is suing for $5,000.  Plaintiff says this is the third time this daughter did this to her, and she's not babysitting again. 

JJ says this isn't a lawsuit, and plaintiff case is dismissed. 

Edited September 11, 2021 by CrazyInAlabama

[KittyQ]

55 minutes ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

Defendant claims anything could have hurt the roof.   This was the second day of the trip, and a lot of adult beverages were involved.   

The defendant also said that since the roof had sod on it, it should be able to take a little extra weight from the man and snowmobile. Has he never had the experience where something is fine until just a little extra weight/pressure/whatever causes it to fail? Heck, I had a plant fall off my mantel because the plant finally grew just enough to change the balance of the planter on the mantel. 

It was a dumb thing to do to use the roof for snowmobiling, but it was probably fun at the time. A really mature person would acknowledge that the damage was done and pay. After all, they already had their fun.

[DoctorK]

3 hours ago, KittyQ said:

The defendant also said that since the roof had sod on it, it should be able to take a little extra weight from the man and snowmobile. Has he never had the experience where something is fine until just a little extra weight/pressure/whatever causes it to fail?

Yep, but this asshole didn't put a little bit more weight on the roof, he put himself (probably about 160 pounds (he had a big but))  and 3 to four hundred pounds of snowmobile, plus he put a rapid moving load producing an an impulse load, not a static load. The kid was a complete asshole.

The asshole Lawyer (was this complete asshole day?) was a jerk. If in fact the hair stylist knew that he was a trump supporter and decided to screw him over, that is bad. However there was no testimony that politics came up. The guy was such an egotistical and self admiring person (like many of the lawyers who are stupid enough to go on the show) that without any politics she may have decided to do something nasty to him which would still have bee wrong and entitled him to his $10 refund.

Edited September 11, 2021 by DoctorK

[Cozytea]

I know the bad haircut lawyer just wanted be on TV. So I'll just pretend he was a guy with a real issue with the haircut.  He didn't notice her pull out the hair clipper? He didn't his hair falling down around him.  Then to add the politics, ridiculous.  Like I said I know he just wanted to be on TV .

[Back Atcha]

 

17 hours ago, DoctorK said:

Yep, but this asshole didn't put a little bit more weight on the roof, he put himself (probably about 160 pounds (he had a big but))  and 3 to four hundred pounds of snowmobile, plus he put a rapid moving load producing an an impulse load, not a static load. The kid was a complete asshole.

The key to the problem.  The plaintiff probably mentioned that, but Judy didn't think it meant "good TV."

Edited September 11, 2021 by Back Atcha

[One Tough Cookie]

On 9/10/2021 at 5:31 PM, CrazyInAlabama said:

Granny or Nanny? (2014) -Plaintiff/grandmother Lynnmarie Johnson suing defendant/daughter Elesia Howard, for child care fees, and lost wages.   Plaintiff was babysitting her daughter's children.   Grandmother says daughter didn't pay for childcare, claiming daughter said she was broke, but still bought weaves, and wigs, and other luxury items.  Daughter has one child.  Plaintiff says she babysat for the one granddaughter, and says daughter was to fill out paperwork to get state babysitting payment.  Since daughter didn't fill out paperwork correctly, it was rejected, so plaintiff was never paid.   Plaintiff is suing for $5,000.  Plaintiff says this is the third time this daughter did this to her, and she's not babysitting aga

She was one scary, angry grandmother.   I wouldn't leave my cat with her.

[CrazyInAlabama]

This week all 4 p.m. reruns are 2013, and all 5 p.m. reruns are 2016.  I’m hoping my local channel keeps doing the two hour block of JJ on weekday afternoons, but I guess we’ll have to see.

4 p.m. reruns-

First (2013)-

House Sitter Horror -Plaintiff Valerie Schermer suing defendants Colleen O’Neill, and boyfriend, Eric Goral, for failing to pet sit and house sit competently while plaintiff was out of town.  Payment to defendants was made in advance, for moonshine, and $120.     

Defendant boyfriend gets the Byrd boot.  Boyfriend claims the payment was after plaintiff returned, and he gets the boot for interrupting.   Girlfriend claims defendant boyfriend is good to her and her daughter.   

When plaintiff returned, she gave the moonshine to defendants, in addition to $120 plaintiff already paid.     Two plaintiff dogs are pit bulls, and were in home with defendant woman’s two-year-old child.   There was puke left in the sink, a dog chewed the mattress topper.   Plaintiff says before they left they painted the entire interior of the house, in preparation to selling.   Defendant woman claims that her daughter didn’t do the damage, and her daughter didn’t mark the walls with markers, or nail polish.   And defendant doesn’t know how the doors ended up with giant holes.  

 There is the show affidavit where defendant woman says boyfriend missed hitting her with his fist, and punched a hole through a door instead.  JJ warns the woman defendant about the man defendant, and sadly she’s right.   I worry for the woman’s little daughter’s safety.

Plaintiff receives $500 to fix the door, from Goral.    Plus, $100 to plaintiff to clean the carpet. 

(Plaintiff in the hall-terview says defendant woman has been in and out of rehab, and was fired from a previous job for eating the dog painkillers.    Plaintiff claims defendant grandmother is trying to get full custody of the little girl)

Bitter Babysitter -Plaintiff /babysitter Angelica West is suing defendant Brittany Harrington for unpaid babysitting fees, $120.  Plaintiff never met either child before she started babysitting for defendant.  Defendant is counter suing for a child being injured under the plaintiff’s care.   Defendant agreed to pay $120 for each day of babysitting, at defendant’s home.  

After defendant refused to pay plaintiff, then plaintiff said she could no longer babysit without payment.  (What the hell did the defendant do to her eyebrows?)

Defendant’s garbage counter claim is dismissed.

$120 to plaintiff.

Second (2013)-

Teenage Vandals -Plaintiffs Sheila and Dean Howell, are suing teenage vandal’s mother Amanda Oman/defendant, and son Dominic Oman-Michlitsch, for car vandalizing restitution.    The 12 year-old defendant did the vandalism while staying with plaintiffs and son Justin Howell, who was 14 at the time.    Plaintiff son went to the movies with Dominic at 11 p.m., and they instead were throwing rocks off of a bridge, on an overpass over the highway, at cars.   The vandals were caught, pled guilty, and the agreement was if both sets of parents paid the restitution, then the vandals’ records would be erased.    Plaintiffs paid the entire restitution, because defendant mother said she didn’t have the money.   Restitution was over $6,000.  

 Then, two vandals were bored, so they vandalized some cars, just for fun.    Plaintiff son took a plea to property damage in the third degree, a gross misdemeanor.    

The plaintiffs are suing the defendant for half of the restitution that plaintiffs had to pay to get their evil POS sons off the hook.  

If the parents hadn’t paid restitution, then both sons would have had felony charges.   Plaintiff parents claim they discussed the case settlement with defendant before the case, but defendant says she never talked to the plaintiffs and never agreed to the deal or the payment.   After the first arrest, why was defendant’s son allowed to be staying at plaintiffs’ house? 

Plaintiff father says they declined to get a private attorney to defend son, so they chose the restitution instead.   The attorney would be over $5k, plus almost $7k for the restitution.  Plaintiff wife lies to JJ, about the attorney.  Police report says the rock throwing was actually the second time they were caught vandalizing at night.     Plaintiff wife says they were arrest at 10 p.m., not 2 a.m.  

Defendant mother says she didn’t have the money, and wasn’t going to pay to get her son’s record cleared.   JJ says plaintiff parents were careless in supervising 12 year old.   The other arrest was a week earlier.

Plaintiff’s case dismissed.  

5 p.m. reruns-

First (2016)-

Death Threat and Racial Profiling-Plaintiff, Hani Barghout, is suing defendants Michael Nowlin, Jr, and wife Nicol Nowlin, of

High Towing and Recovery of Denver, over his car being towed, racial profiling resulting in his arrest at gunpoint, and false police reports.   Plaintiff’s car was towed by the two defendant's tow company, when he parked in an apartment parking lot (he doesn't live there, or have the person who gave him permission to park there in court).   

Defendant man says it was the Salvation Army's permit only parking lot.  In the morning plaintiff discovered his car had been towed.   

Defendant claimed the plaintiff threw a rock at their tow yard the night before.   Defendant's witness claims he saw plaintiff too, and case was dismissed after defendants didn't show up for trial.  

Plaintiff was arrested when he went to retrieve his car, after the defendant wife called him a crazy Islamic guy when he called the tow yard, and arrived with cash in hand to pay for the tow.   Defendant wife also claims between the first visit to tow yard, and the next day the plaintiff changed his beard, The second time defendant wife claimed he threatened her on the phone several times, and made a police report again that was false. 

At the first report of rock throwing, the plaintiff was arrested, and the case was dismissed.     Second case didn't even go to trial, because defendant lied about her name on police report (She had a different name on the first police report, Nicol Craven, not the name the show put under her photo on the show, Nicol Nowlin of Denver-she looks very familiar to me, I used to live near there). 

I find it strange that a Denver tow company drives two hours south to Pueblo to tow cars.  

Six months later the plaintiff was arrested because the defendant wife claims he threatened her when he picked up his car at the first incident (report date was January, arrest at gun point was in June).     That case was dismissed also.  

JJ is right, car tow was legal.   

However, two false arrests are exactly what happened. (Audience erupts in applause at this verdict, and I call the second police report by the defendant wife to be totally despicable).     (I used to live near Denver, and the plaintiff is lucky he survived two arrests, especially the second one where he was claimed to be making death threats against defendant).

 $5,000 to plaintiff. 

Check Bouncy House-Plaintiff Elinor Zetina, suing former friend /defendant Daniel Vain for two bad checks she cashed for defendant.     Defendant had done some remodeling for plaintiff several years before, and he needed a place to stay, and she offered to cash a large cashier's check for defendant. $2750 was the first check, but credit union said it was an altered or bad check.     

Then plaintiff cashed another check for him.     He gave her a bad check, and then she cashes another one for him!      Second check will not be paid by the show.   How stupid can a plaintiff be?    Bet she's waiting for her deceased uncle in Nigeria to send her millions too.  

$2750 to plaintiff for the first check, but nothing for second check, because she had no expectation of payment.   

Second (2016)-

You Sound Like a Fool-Plaintiff Elaina Pitre suing defendant Josefina Garcia for medical treatment, rabies shots, and damages after defendant's poodle bit her.   Dog bit plaintiff in the apartment parking lot, dog was off leash, collarless, was wandering in the street without an owner.  Poodle came over to plaintiff, then went in the street again, then poodle came back, and poodle bit her on the hand.  Plaintiff claims a woman came out of the defendant's apartment complex, and when plaintiff told her what happened, neighbor says the dog wanders constantly, and has bitten before.   Plaintiff called animal control, and defendant's young daughter came out of the apartment complex, and dog owner got defensive.    Animal Control report says no proof of rabies shots, so plaintiff had to get four shots in her arm over three weeks.   

Defendant's witness is an adult friend of defendant, and they keep calling the plaintiff a liar.      Defendant and her witness's excuses are ridiculous.   Defendant witness says plaintiff probably was bitten by another dog.   Defendant hasn't paid the impound fee either.   Defendant's witness claims dog was outside briefly, wasn't off the property, and never bit the plaintiff.   Defendant's witness, Karla Sanchez, is such a liar, and keeps mouthing off at JJ.   

Animal control report says neighbors says poodle is frequently running loose.  Defendant claims plaintiff hates Latinos.   

Plaintiff gets $1500.   (I would have given plaintiff $5,000, so defendant wouldn’t get a penny).

Gambling Getaway Gone Wrong-Plaintiff Esther Haskin suing ex-boyfriend/defendant Tony Lopez  for unpaid gambling loan, and property damage.   They went from Stockton to Reno, defendant claims woman gave him $800 so he wouldn't bounce a check for gambling, and plaintiff gets $800 for the loan back. 

Plaintiff gets $800 for the loan, but all property damage claims are dismissed from both litigants. 

[CrazyInAlabama]

4 p.m. reruns-

First (2013)-

Video Game Pile-Up -Plaintiffs Alicia Koeb and Sarah Wood are suing temporary housing landlady / defendants Aleeyah Davis(daughter, 17 years old) and (mother) Lorraine Levine for the despicable expo housing room share.   The defendant daughter , Aleeyah, rented the apartment off of a web site, to rerent to  Boston video game convention goers.  Plaintiffs signed up for the housing share, and when they arrived there were over a dozen men in the apartment also.   $85 each for three nights.  

Daughter defendant says she wasn’t making any money, but she was.  Ad says everyone gets a bed, and breakfast supplied, for three people, plus three others.   Instead, the place was packed when the plaintiffs showed up.    It was advertised as a 3 bedroom, but it was actually a 1 bedroom, with 12 men in it, plus Aleeyah.    Defendant admits the apartment had 8 already there, plus another woman arriving soon, plus two plaintiffs, so 11 and later 12.    Plaintiff says the apartment reeked of “Man”.   

Did Aleeyah and her mom go to the hairdresser from hell?   Bad wig on daughter.

Plaintiffs slept at the convention center parking lot in their car.   Daughter Aleeyah has been doing this for years.

Plaintiffs get $170.

Child Support Scammer -Plaintiff/(SSMOT-Sainted Single Mother of Two with defendant) Lauren Marquis suing defendant/baby daddy Angelo Soares for a loan to defendant to pay his bills, $4,000.   Plaintiff claims the defendant didn’t pay her back.  Defendant claims he was paying child support for the first year to plaintiff in cash.  Plaintiff denies defendant paid her $125 a week  for child support in cash.  

When plaintiff went to court for a child support order, the garnished amount includes insurance too, and court charges him arrearages.      However, the arrearage was only because plaintiff lied about defendant paying her child support for that first year.

Defendant says the gift only became a loan when the litigants’ plans to get back together fell through.

Plus, defendant’s kids are cared for by defendant’s mother, and always have been.

Plaintiff claim dismissed. 

Second (2013)-

House Sitter Hijacker? -Plaintiff /home owner Stever Crestol suing defendant/house sitter Kristen Curtis for trashing the house, stealing property, and money, and neglecting his dog.   Plaintiff was traveling, and claims he was too tired to take pictures with his cell phone.  However, plaintiff did use his phone to text the defendant.   Plaintiff and his other part time housemate are in the motion picture business, and travel a lot.     Plaintiff did not do a full background check on defendant.  

 There were two forged checks the bank notified plaintiff about.   Then two more bad checks coming through.  So, defendant asked his L.A.P.D. neighbor to remove jewelry and other valuables from the house and secure them.    When neighbor went to find the jewelry, and it was there.  However, checkbook was useless to thief after account was closed by plaintiff.   Plaintiff claims $2,000 in cash was claimed stolen from his desk by thieving defendant.    Plaintiff claims the $2,000 was stolen, his laptop, tools, and other items.   Plaintiff submits texts from defendant.   Also, LAPD neighbor can’t appear in court or on TV.  This happened in Canyon Country, CA.   

Plaintiff didn’t take photos of house damage.   Plaintiff has no proof of defendant stealing and trashing of house.  JJ doesn’t’ believe the $2,000 cash.

Plaintiff case dismissed.

Drunk, Disorderly and Half Naked -Plaintiff Kristin Ewart suing defendant Alfredo “Fred”  Robles (21 years-old) for breaking her TV, and a Wie speaker during a party at plaintiff’s house.   Defendant blames the TV and Wie damages on plaintiff feeding him alcohol, and says it’s a “Party Foul”.   Officer Byrd doesn’t know what that means.  

Plaintiff said defendant’s pants were down below his knees, and he was standing next to the fallen TV, trying to pick the TV up, and there is a huge dent in the wall next to the TV, probably from defendant’s head.

Defendant doesn’t remember anything about the end of the party.    And denies he did anything while drunk.    At his age, if you are drinking so much you don’t remember anything the next day, you’re in serious trouble.  In the hall-terview plaintiff claims defendant was playing beer pong, followed by vodka shots.  Defendant says he’s trying to get his tolerance up.

Plaintiff receives $1500.

5 p.m. reruns-

First (2016)-

The Fixer-Plaintiff Steven Rogers suing defendant Valerie Gallegos and her son Milton Chatman, for fraud over a car sale.   Plaintiff bought a non-running 2007 Hyundai for $500, and was promised the title within a week.   Car was bought originally from defendant's cousin, and was never registered or titled in defendant's name (car was always in cousin's and cousin’s ex-wife's name).   Plaintiff worked on the car, and it's now running.   Plaintiff paid $500, and spent $ 2,000 fixing it up, including a new engine.    So, car is now running. 

 Car was bought from defendant’s cousin for $3,000, but never reregistered to defendant or son.  Plaintiff says defendant mother told him the title was in son’s name, omitting that car was in cousin, and ex-wife’s name, and both needed to sign off for title and registration transfer.

Plaintiff gets $2500, defendants get car back, because they were selling a car they never owned.  Plaintiff will drive car to defendant’s home.   (I have to say that plaintiff's name is Mr. Rogers, and all I have running through my head is that it's not a beautiful day in his neighborhood).   Plaintiff should never have touched the car until he had a title in hand. 

Motorcycle Regrets-Plaintiff Wayne Stultz (bailed bike out of impound), and Steven Dickinson (owner of bike)  suing former friend Daniel Pettitt, and his mother Michele Pelletier, for impound fees, and something about motorcycle accessories.    Motorcycle was sold to defendant, and he was going to make payments on bike, and took possession of motorcycle.   

Defendant claims he was going to return the bike, kept it a week, but was pulled over for lack of registration, and bike was impounded. Defendant claims he was returning the bike to plaintiff Steven Dickinson.    Defendant claims bike was registered to the plaintiff, and has zero proof.   Impound fee was $1229, paid by plaintiff Wayne Stultz, and motorcycle stuff was in defendant's possession and disappeared. 

Plaintiff gets $1229 for the impound fees, and plaintiff will sell bike.  (Hall-terview, whiny little baby defendant explains that the mean kids were picking on him).

Second (2016)-

Dangerous Drinking- Plaintiff Justin Jacobs is suing ex-girlfriend Jessica Paolo for false police report and arrest, and stealing his stuff.  Plaintiff/ex-boyfriend and defendant/ex-girlfriend were both drunk, but defendant is proud of the fact she wasn't as drunk as the plaintiff.      

Defendant filed petition to get restraining order.  Plaintiff claims defendant filed exact same allegations to get restraining order against ex-husband, but has no proof.    Defendant's mother seems to think allegations her daughter is a drunk are amusing.  There is no proof of his abuse on defendant.   

Defendant claims after plaintiff's arrest, she moved the truck to guest parking.   She left everything in the truck for his mother to pick up, with the keys near the truck.   However, he couldn't find his truck keys, and a lot of property disappeared out of the truck.  Plaintiff even has a receipt for the rifle.   Defendant's uncle claims he saw items in the truck when defendant moved the truck to the guest parking spot, and she had the keys to the truck then.   

However, defendant 'lost' the keys, so plaintiff's mother had to get AAA to tow the truck.   Defendant's mother is just as pathetic as her daughter, and just won't shut up.     Defendant still claims the rifle was a gift to her.    Both sides need a group rate to rehab.   

$800 to plaintiff for the rifle.  

(The last JJ was filmed months ago, and there will be no more new ones, ever.    Her new show on Amazon's IMDB streaming service will start 1 November.   Depending on the contracts, and what the local stations want to pay to run, JJ reruns may run or be replaced with some boring talk show, or something else). 

Edited September 15, 2021 by CrazyInAlabama

[NYGirl]

Does anybody know if we are getting any new episodes this season?  I keep seeing JJ with her good hairstyle in cases that are repeats.

[CrazyInAlabama]

4 p.m. reruns-

First (2013)-

Pellet Gun Shoot Out -Plaintiff/car owner Audrey Neal suing defendant parent Daniel Hall, and son Kevin Hall, for the 14-year-old shooting out her windshield.  Ms. Neal was driving her car home, something shattered her windshield, and she had an eye injury.   Unfortunately, the pellet gun incident was after plaintiff had cataract surgery, and it injured her eye again.    Son Kevin Hall had four detentions in school, (that the parent knows about), and was then suspended from school, and has not done well in his classes.   Defendant father and mother bought the pellet gun for delinquent Kevin Hall.  

Kevin Hall admits to more than the four detentions his father talked about in court.    He also can’t remember why he got detention, and admits he didn’t pass most of his classes in the previous year, and the year of this incident.   Kevin was suspended for hitting a girl with a pencil (that’s known as assault, and was listed as harassment).    

When Kevin was suspended his parents sent him to his grandfather’s house.   The pellet gun was at the grandfather’s house.     Kevin claims the pellet gun is only used with his grandfather present.   Kevin the delinquent also claims the pellet gun found by police in the bushes wasn’t his, and he doesn’t know who shot Ms. Neal’s window.     Ms. Neal’s police statement identifies Kevin Hall as the attacker, and knows the other two boys, a neighbor’s son, and the other kid was unknown to plaintiff.

JJ calls Kevin the delinquent to the witness chair to tell her his lies.     Former friend of Kevin the delinquent, Lewis, wrote a note saying Kevin shot the windshield, and says Kevin has broken numerous windows.   Father believes Kevin’s lies that he was in the grandfather’s house watching TV, and not out shooting the BB gun.     Kevin’s father keeps saying Kevin isn’t a bad kid, or a bad student, both statements are total ca-ca.    Daniel Hall blames the suspension on the girl that was assaulted, and the school aide, and claims the other kids are lying about Kevin Hall being the shooter.   Now father is blaming everything on the neighborhood, not his kid.  Father also says his son is being bullied.

Plaintiff receives $1325 (JJ would have given her more).  I think JJ should have given plaintiff $5,000, so lying Kevin, and his father wouldn’t get a penny.

Car Security – Plaintiffs Tyson Smith and Kimberly Bara are suing defendant Matthew Arnold for a car and engine purchased for $1600.    The car was a non-running vehicle, and engine was for the car, to get it running again.      Plaintiffs didn’t get the title for the car, and now that the car is running, plaintiff can’t register the car (this is in California).    JJ will send litigants to the DMV right across from the court room, and register the car now. 

Plaintiffs will register the car now at DMV. 

Second (2013)-

Don’t Spank My Daughter! -Plaintiff/mother Suzanne Longo-Clark suing defendant/father ex-husband Douglas Clark, for $5,000 for him filing charges against her for spanking their 9-year-old daughter.  Plaintiff is court-ordered not to touch the child, but ignored that, so father contacted CPS.  Father has full primary physical custody.   Plaintiff keeps whining about CPS being involved, claims CPS and custody was all rigged.    Mother had visitation with the child, supervised only.     During a supervised court visitation (supervisor is plaintiff’s witness), plaintiff spanked her child at least twice.

There are scheduled phone calls between mother and daughter, and mother says daughter was disrespectful ten calls in a row, and daughter would hang up.    Visitation was once a week, and phone calls were weekly too.    Mother keeps claiming ex-boyfriend or husband is mean to her. 

When daughter came for visitation, mother hit her on the butt twice, in front of the supervisor.   In my view plaintiff witness/visitation supervisor should be taken off the list for supervising visits.   I question the supervisor’s impartiality.     When daughter returned home, father filed a sheriff’s report about the court order visitation violation.   Defendant has a protective order against the plaintiff, and daughter is a protected person on that order.  

Plaintiff witness/supervisor apparently sees nothing wrong with plaintiff violating the order which states that she can’t strike, slap, or otherwise use corporal punishment on the daughter.  Plaintiff keeps sneaking in that defendant supposedly threatened to kill her, and beat her.    

As JJ says, this wasn’t a false allegation by the father.    Plaintiff refuses to admit that she broke the court order not to strike her child.    Court visitation supervisor is still going to work with plaintiff and supervise visitation, which I object to.   He’s not impartial.   (Since this case was 2013, and child was 9 when this happened, then child should be old enough not to have to deal with plaintiff any longer).

In hall-terview, plaintiff goes off on her witness, and former visitation supervisor.  She claims he lied about her too.   Why do I bet he was next on her list to sue?   She seems to be a frequent flier in court.

Plaintiff case dismissed.  

Broken Door = Broken Friendship -Plaintiff Elizabeth O’Harra suing defendant/former friend Lauren Olsen for defendant breaking two door handles on plaintiff’s car.   This was winter, and plaintiff claims she broke two door handles off, an inside handle and an outside handle.   $576 is what plaintiff wants.

Plaintiff receives $0.

5 p.m. reruns-

First (2016)-

Bad Babysitter Barter-Plaintiff Jamie Cox suing defendant Brian Richardson for defendant wanting a $400 loan repaid. Plaintiff claims she doesn't need to repay $400 loan to defendant, because she was supposed to get defendant's Jeep in return for babysitting his child, and taking child to and from school, and before and after school care.   She claims she worked many hours, paid off the Jeep, but defendant didn't pay her for more babysitting, and she got behind in her bills.   JJ figures out she didn't work for $1800 worth, but much less.   Defendant was only loaned to plaintiff for when she was babysitting.  Plaintiff wants $5,000.

The plaintiff claims defendant didn't pay her much, and repossessed. the Jeep.    Plaintiff also claims man lusted after her, but she obviously had another boyfriend (she's quite pregnant), and defendant says she watched the child every other week (custody issues).     

Funny note-defendant buries money in his back yard, and announced this to 10 million viewers.   JJ advises him to move the money.   

(I used to live in Colorado Springs, and why would plaintiff drive an hour each way from Pueblo to bar tend in snow country?   They have lots of bars in Pueblo, and this makes no sense).   Defendant claims a friend of plaintiff, and plaintiff's mom threatened him.  

Plaintiff wrote down loan on her list of money, for the $400.   

$400 to defendant, and nothing to plaintiff.  

Matching Tattoo Fail-Plaintiff Meghan Soncrant suing ex-boyfriend/defendant Tyler Nichols for cost of matching tattoos, and a bedroom set.    Defendant did not pay for bedroom set, $2350 (King size bed, frame, and TV), because he claims it's was a gift. 

Defendant's nasty emails are so bad that it can't be read on TV.  When JJ asks Officer Byrd to show defendant (who she calls Shakespeare) the emails where he admitted the loan, Officer Byrd is laughing the whole way at the Shakespeare remark.

Defendant's new girlfriend is his witness, and gets the Byrd boot.   She also had her hair dyed that awful neon red color.

$2235 to plaintiff (loser defendant actually made one payment already).

Second (2016)-

Be Afraid... Or Not-Plaintiff/former girlfriend Kassandra Weber left home of defendants/ex-boyfriend Nathan Hofstader, and his nasty mother, Delora Hofstader,  and claims they destroyed her property (21 and they lived together for 3 years). 

Plaintiff's mother is asked why she didn't ask her 21-year-old daughter to come home to escape an abusive relationship.  Mother's answer is "because she's an adult, and lives on her own".   

Plaintiff is 21 now, and was 18 when they moved in together, and defendant is now 23, and was 20 when they moved in together.   After plaintiff claims defendant cut her clothes up, they still lived together until April (plaintiff claims she moved out, but I don't believe her) with his mother, and then with roommates, and defendant’s parents again.      In April, plaintiff and loud-mouthed defendant's mother emptied the storage unit, but plaintiff claims there is still property at defendant's mother's house, but mother denies it.    

There were multiple police reports about malicious mischief, one report wasn't done until over a month later.  Plaintiff claims defendant has many police reports against him, and his loud mouth mother is awful.    

Plaintiff now gives up on everything but her car, that had domestic abuse against it (yes, a car had domestic abuse against it).  Police report says domestic abuse, and plaintiff says the abuse was on the car.  

Case dismissed.  

DWI Disability Fail-  Plaintiff Meeghan Franciso suing former friend/defendant Elizabeth Vedder  for false accusations against plaintiff of depositing a check.   Litigants were in the Military together, and became roommates after.   When defendant went to jail for DWI, she told plaintiff to cash the check for rent.   Plaintiff claims she gave money leftover above rent to defendant.     

Plaintiff forged defendant’s name on the check, but claims defendant told her to do that, and cash the check.    The check was cashed by plaintiff, and defendant told her bank it was false cashing of check, so plaintiff had $1,000 taken out of her account.     When defendant was released from jail, she didn't pay her rent, because the plaintiff paid it for her, and still owed her $1,000.      Defendant wants $1000 back, has no proof of anything. 

Case dismissed.

(I believe the show aired the last original episodes, and the final few were not great, and I think were earlier rejected ones for airing.   I think we'll get reruns as long as the local channels pay the fee to air them. )

Edited September 16, 2021 by CrazyInAlabama

[basiltherat]

Little Kevin is on his way to becoming a full-fledged psycho killer.  Wonder if Daddy Dearest will visit him on death row . . . that is, unless Kevin kills him first!

Also psycho is Suzanne, the mother who is ready to go medieval on her ex-husband AND her daughter.  At least she was rational enough to fire the counselor!  She is more obsessed with her ex than wanting to see her own daughter.  Doesn't she realize that the more she tries to teach the kid to hate the father, the more the kid will hate HER !!

[Taeolas]

CBS seems to be trying to keep the series ending lowkey, probably to try and maintain the rerun slots as long as they can. I don't know if the final new eps have aired or not (heard they would air in September), but the show Judge Judy is probably done. 

I've noticed WSBK has switched the post HotBench older rerun episodes over to "Relation Court"; though my PVR Guide hasn't quite caught up yet (so it records them thinking they are JJ eps).  Not sure when the later afternoon eps will disappear, but it probably won't be too long now. 

[Back Atcha]

19 hours ago, basiltherat said:

Doesn't she realize that the more she tries to teach the kid to hate the father, the more the kid will hate HER !!

She's mentally ill...and dangerous.  I hope her caseworker(s) see this show every time it's broadcast and are diligent.

[CrazyInAlabama]

4 p.m. reruns-

First (2013)-

Honey Delivery Disaster -Plaintiff Konrad Bouffard suing defendant/former honey delivery driver Katharine Dutcher for having two accidents in company car, and taking the car without permission.  Defendant drove company car to make honey deliveries.   The defendant would meet plaintiff, with the company car, already loaded with honey.   Then, defendant bought her own car, and she would meet at the warehouse, and pick up the company car, wrapped in the company advertising.  (This happened in Austin, TX).   Plaintiff was a 1099, contract employee.   A few months later, defendant had one accident while delivering honey while driving the company car, and sometimes she took the company car home. 

Defendant admits first accident was hitting a tree. Plaintiff says she wasn’t on site she was assigned to when the first accident happened.   Defendant doesn’t remember hitting the tree, until after the second accident.   Photos of damage from accident #1 with the tree shows the pickup truck bed passenger side is very dented.    Second accident was when defendant went to a wine bar, and then to another location, and had the second accident.   So, defendant wasn’t on company business for the second accident in a couple of days.   The defendant says she only had an hour’s worth of sleep in 36 hours, and was drinking wine. 

My question is if defendant doesn’t remember a major accident with a tree, was she really driving?  Plaintiff withheld a $647 check from defendant.

Accident damage is $2293 minus the $647, $1646 to plaintiff.

So, Sue Me, Roomie -Plaintiff Evan Serling suing defendant Gilbert “Petey” Garcia for non-payment of rent and utilities.   Plaintiff was renting a house, and defendant rented the bedroom for $750, from plaintiff.   Defendant was there for 5 months, and didn’t pay for 3 months rent ($2250), and owes $1,000 for his portion of utilities. 

Defendant says he told plaintiff he lost his job.   Then, defendant moved back to his parents’ home.  Defendant claims plaintiff told him not to pay, what he said was not to worry about it.   JJ can’t take it when defendant says “like” and "basically", and other filler words., and asks Officer Byrd if she can borrow the Kelly Blue Book to read until defendant finishes his ridiculous statement.  Defendant is counter claiming for his TV, and property he left behind at plaintiff’s home. 

$3250 to plaintiff.  

Second (2013)-

Trust Fund Raid -Plaintiff/daughter Abby Jensen suing defendant father James “Jamie” Jensen over her missing trust fund that father raided.  Father admits he took the money from daughter’s account, but it was to save money from spendthrift daughter.   Trust fund was $4647, started with $1100,  set up by defendant’s mother and brother for plaintiff when she turns 21.   Defendant was trustee on the account, took the money and put it in another bank under his name. 

Paperwork says father/defendant’s name, not Trust Account.    JJ tells defendant to put money in the trust, or daughter/plaintiff will file criminal felony charges in five days.

Plaintiff gets her $4647 into the trust fund she gets at 21 (she’s 19 now). Defendant says daughter demanded her money, but plaintiff says she didn’t, and knows she has to wait until 21.    The other account was a joint father, and daughter account (she was a minor), and plaintiff put the earnings since she was 16 in that account, and when she was no longer a minor she took the money out of that account, and father say some of the money was his.  Defendant claims he had a pay check in the closed account, daughter took the money.  

Daughter wants money for car for college.    I would be proud to have a grown up child like the daughter.     She’s so hard working, and responsible.   Daughter is going to a community college for two years, and she works full time.  

Plaintiff lives on her own, and works full time now, and is going to college in the fall.

Father shows his true personality, criticizing the daughter, and the way she lives. 

Daughter closed the joint account two years ago, so defendant claim dismissed.

JJ tells defendant he has five days to put the trust account money back in the bank, or criminal charges will be filed.  $4647 to account, or applied directly to the college for tuition.   

Furniture Fight -Plaintiff Julia Easley suing defendants/former roommates Amanda Strobridge and Kole Klentz after they kept her furniture.   The three met online, and  after that they moved in together into an apartment with a year’s lease.   When plaintiff decided to move with a boyfriend, and told defendants’ she was breaking her lease, defendants kept her furniture.   Defendants couldn’t afford the lease without a third roommate, so were going to sell the dining room set, a few chairs end table, minor kitchen stuff, DVD player, and other stuff.   

Then plaintiff’s boyfriend was discharged from the Air Force, and went home, so plaintiff stayed at the apartment.   

Plaintiff gets her furniture back, and is told if she doesn’t pick it up in five days, it’s gone.  Defendants are paying $692 lease breaking fee.   Plaintiff claims that’s not her money to pay.

$692 to defendants, when furniture goes back to plaintiff.

Hall-terview is hysterical with plaintiff saying how wonderful she is.  Defendants say the second plaintiff met her “Facebook Man”, she started doing ridiculous stuff, and moved her ‘psycho’ mother in to the apartment. I have to wonder if "Facebook Man" even existed?  (Hall-terview was the best part of the case)

5 p.m. reruns-

First (2016)-

Baby Daddy Bye Bye-Plaintiff Emily Austin, SSMOT (Sainted Single Mother of Two, one with defendant) is suing defendant/ ex Nicholas Hardin over a car trade in.   Plaintiff has two-year-old by someone else, defendant said he would treat the kid as his own, and she's now is the mother of his kid too.  Her parents actually let him move into their house, because he said he would take over the role of father for plaintiff's kid.   

Plaintiff used a car as a trade in, and defendant ended up with a Toyota Tundra (only kept for a month, then back to the dealer), and a Jeep that he still has.   Defendant still owes $6,600 for the Toyota, but plaintiff let defendant used her car as a trade in on the Tundra.     She traded her car in because she wanted a car for her two kids, and now has no car.   She doesn't work. 

Idiot plaintiff's idiot father (he’s the plaintiff witness) is whining in court about the unfairness of the defendant taking the car.   As JJ says, plaintiff parents were thrilled about someone taking daughter, and her kid off their hands.   In the hall-terview why does the plaintiff whine about needing day care paid for, when she doesn't work?    As JJ said, the plaintiff father would let anything go on in his house to unload the daughter, and her kids on someone else. 

Case dismissed.   

Hair Cutting Double-Talk-  Plaintiff Rande Hackmann sold defendant Corey McBroom,  a custom kitchen island, and built out a custom salon in the commercial space of the building.  Plaintiff wants to be paid for the island.   The island was in an apartment for the defendant.    The defendant has the salon, and his apartment in the same apartment complex.  Plaintiff worked for the apartment/commercial complex at the time of the salon build out.

Defendant hairdresser claims no firm price (but says $2k in statement by defendant).    I suspect JJ is right, defendant just wanted an L.A. paid vacation.  Defendant claims he paid $300 cash, plus $420, = $720, and says he paid the rest in haircuts.   

Plaintiff gets $1055.  

Second (2016)-

21st Birthday Party Down the Toilet-Plaintiff/father Michael LeLoo suing defendant/venue renter Leo Giang for renting a house/venue with inadequate plumbing (one toilet, not allowed to use toilet paper, and a urinal pit in the back yard).  Plaintiff rented house for a 21st birthday party (for son's birthday party, instead of his condo), and there was only one working toilet, with no toilet paper flushing allowed, and an outside urinal pit.   Defendant claims to have had parties up to 300 people at the house, and have to carry toilet paper outside in garbage bags.   There is nothing in the contract about the bathrooms, just a sign in the one working bathroom, with one toilet.   Plaintiff claims defendant rented backyard, and defendant lives in the house.  Defendant is counter suing for damages to plumbing. 

This case is so disgusting.    How can any jurisdiction allow this person to rent this house, with unusable plumbing?   How can the local jurisdiction let this sewage situation exist?  There is no way a septic system should support that many people, or that a residential home should have a urinal pit in the back yard either.    I suspect his septic system needs replacement too.  Plaintiff son only had 22 guests, not the usual 300 defendant rents to usually.   Party was in the backyard, not the main house.

Defendant is counter claiming for damage to his home’s plumbing.  Dismissed.

 $750 was rental price, and plaintiff gets $350 back. (Defendant already refunded $100 to the plaintiff). 

Volvo Custody Fight-Plaintiff/car buyer Diana Corrales suing defendant/car seller Roberto Prado for repair costs, and storage fees for 2005 Volvo S80.   Plaintiff bought car from defendant, and claimed it couldn't be smogged, and therefore, was not able to be registered.  Plaintiff wants to keep car, but get paid for mechanical work she put into it.  This is a California sale, and is required to have a valid smog certification, so ‘As Is’ doesn't cancel the smog requirement out.   

Plaintiff wants to get paid to fix car, and get it registered. If I interpret what she said about T.J., she wants to go back and forth to Tijuana, but car isn't registered, and would get impounded.  So she's garaging it.  

Defendant will have to take the car back, $2100 (car sale price only, not repairs), and refund car price back to plaintiff. 

 However, plaintiff wants to keep car, so her case is dismissed. 

Edited September 17, 2021 by CrazyInAlabama

[CrazyInAlabama]

4 p.m. reruns-

First (2013)-

Too Much Vodka -Plaintiff Tyshara Gatling suing defendant Malcom Harris for trashing her belongings during a night of heavy drinking.    Both litigants claim the other was very drunk.     They bought Peach Ciroc Vodka.  Plaintiff claims Malcolm drank half of the huge bottle of vodka, and he admits that.  When they went to a club, plaintiff claims defendant was buying more beers with her money, and she left.  

The two litigants are no longer dating.    Plaintiff says defendant was ranting, and when they arrived home plaintiff claims defendant was yelling at her.  Plaintiff claims defendant slapped her, and then broke her TV.  TV breaking was ignored by other people in the apartment.

Plaintiff’s sister testifies about the assault by defendant.   Sister claims defendant admitted breaking the TV, and a laptop.   Defendant claims drunk plaintiff slapped and punched him. 

Plaintiff $420.

Paternity Test Time -Plaintiff/SSMOO (Sainted Single Mother of One) Kristina Valentie is suing defendant/ex, and possible baby daddy Christopher Graham over furniture, and three phones.  Plaintiff leased the furniture from Aaron’s, and defendant put it in storage, he told plaintiff when he had to close out the storage unit, and plaintiff never picked it up, so it’s gone.    As JJ said, why didn’t plaintiff tell Aaron’s where the furniture was, two years ago, but didn’t care about the furniture until the collections notice came from Aaron’s.  

Plaintiff is in the process of requesting a paternity test from the defendant from the family court. Defendant doesn’t pay child support, and plaintiff never took him to court, or requested a paternity test to establish paternity, and get support. 

Plaintiff already paid furniture off, and now has no claim.   Claim dismissed.

Second (2013)-

Explicit Photos Disputed -Plaintiff Tora White (male, photographer) suing defendant/ex-girlfriend LaToya Rutledge over her use of his photos of her on her website, and never paid him or gave him credit.    The litigants were dating for a short while, and are no longer intimate.  Defendant says they’re still intimate, but a few years ago.   Defendant says plaintiff is using pictures of her on his professional photography website.

Defendant won’t stop using “like” in every sentence, and the equally irritating “tooken”.    

Then a couple of years after the initial photos taken at her home, a couple of years later plaintiff wanted to update the photos, and now the naked photos of defendant are on the internet forever. There was no contract.    Defendant’s counter suit dismissed.  Plaintiff has a text with defendant for $150, for a photo session of her sister for prom (hopefully wearing a dress, not naked).   Defendant says plaintiff never charges her for photos, on numerous occasions.

Plaintiff receives $150.  

Hell Date -Plaintiff Donald Causey suing defendant Amanda Jeanblanc, over her taking his car without permission, wrecking his car, and he lost his job as a result of that.   They met online, with plaintiff saying he was “Single and ready to mingle”.  They only met in person on 8 April, after being on Facebook communicating with her several times, and he picked her up at a hotel parking lot and going to plaintiff’s home.   Defendant brought her little girl to his home too. 

Defendant says plaintiff gave her alcohol, and the car keys, and she was going to visit a friend at midnight when the accident happened. 

The car was wrecked on 11 April.   Defendant says she was driving plaintiff’s car, when a truck was on her side of the road, and hit her head on.    Police report say defendant was drunk when she wrecked plaintiff’s car.

Plaintiff old to box the clothes defendant left at his home, and mail them, after defendant returns his house keys

$1875 to plaintiff.

(There are so many reflags with this case.   The plaintiff moves a woman into his place, with her little daughter the night they met, he picks her up in a hotel parking lot.   So where was her daughter when defendant was swiping plaintiff's car, and wrecking while drinking?   Everyone involved is lucky this was on JJ, and not a crime documentary). 

5 p.m. reruns-

First (2016)-

Eye Witness Wow-Plaintiff Tashawna Woodberry is suing brother Laird Williams, and his wife Leaha Williams, over damage to plaintiff's rental car.   Defendants were having marital issues, and brother wanted plaintiff to rent a car for him to take his two kids to visit in Minneapolis.  Defendant Laird went back to his home instead, and claims plaintiff husband had the car when the damages happened.    Marcus Woodberry, husband of plaintiff says his brother-in-law called him, and told him about the broken car windshield, done by the defendant’s wife.

Witness for plaintiff, former neighbor of defendants, Sandra Jackson, saw defendant wife smashing the windshield with a brick, twice.   Defendants were late returning vehicle, and didn't pay plaintiff, until she threatened to file theft charges.  Then the windshield damage happened.   

$761 to plaintiff.

Pack Your Bags...Guilt Trip-Plaintiff Catherine Helms loaned a 30-year-old truck to her son/defendant Wesley Helms, claims it was trashed by the time returned, and she's suing for the truck value, and every penny she's ever spent on it, vehicle tax, registration, insurance, and maintenance.   Plaintiff claims truck was her only vehicle, but her long term boyfriend has three vehicles she used.   Plaintiff/mother claims she had to junk/salvage the truck.   However, her son-in-law, defendant sister,  and son/defendant say she sold it to someone they know.  Plaintiff witness, son-in-law of plaintiff, and defendant’s sister’s husband, reluctantly admits that plaintiff sold the truck to someone at the dealership he works at. 

Plaintiff wants $2300 for the truck, but she gets zip.

The plaintiff/mother is so full of it, and her phony poor little me routine in the Hall-terview is pathetic.   Crying works better with actual tears. Defendant in the hall-terview says with the mother his whole life it’s been “Pack your bags, we’re going on a guilt trip”.

Second (2016)-

Car in Captivity  - Plaintiff Jacqueline Pewitt claims her car has been held captive by defendant Freemon Monger  for 10 months at his car repair lot.  Plaintiff wants cost of repairs, value of the 1999 car, replacement of car key, and lost wages, totaling $5,000.   Plaintiff took her car to the mechanic in August, and claims the fact she had no car caused her company to fire her.    The original car issue was oil pan, and radiator (she ran over something).  Car was brought in for work in August, and plaintiff claims she paid in full.   Defendants claim plaintiff paid $780.   Plaintiff picked car up after oil leak and radiator repair, and then took it back to mechanic again.  

Defendant claims plaintiff still owes for further work, and they're not releasing car until the payment.   

Car is running, but motor is past warranty period, but why should defendants suffer because plaintiff took a long time to pay her bills?    JJ says to go get the car, and take it somewhere else, and gets her $780 back (if you want a used engine, you take your chances with it working, and if there’s a warranty, it’s for a very limited time).    Plaintiff keeps interrupting, and correcting JJ, and I think her case should have been tossed for that.

$780 to plaintiff, and that's it.  (I don't think plaintiff should have received a dime, she's a scammer, and a liar.  Anyone who comes to court with phony receipts should be thrown out.   Car was towed into the mechanic's shop, and is now drivable.) 

Speed Eviction-   Plaintiffs Aaron and Vanessa Phillips suing former landlords Melvin Steele and  girlfriend Azaneth Torres  for return of security deposit and rent.  Defendants rented a townhouse, and rented a bedroom to plaintiffs for a week.   Deposit was $1,000, and $800 rent, and they paid $1700 to defendants.  The defendants rent out three rooms, illegally.   

Eviction was because plaintiffs weren't on the lease.   Property manager, another proposed tenant, and the police came to the house, and told the plaintiffs to leave. 

 In the Hall-terview the plaintiff says they found out that the defendants had an eviction action going against them, and said there were a bunch of 'prospective' tenants knocking on the door constantly.  

 $1700 to plaintiffs. 

Edited September 18, 2021 by CrazyInAlabama

[khyber]

“Pack your bags, we’re going on a guilt trip”.

That is a great line. I must remember that one.

[TVMovieBuff]

22 hours ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

Hell Date -Plaintiff Donald Causey suing defendant Amanda Jeanblanc, over her taking his car without permission, wrecking his car, and he lost his job as a result of that.   They met online, with plaintiff saying he was “Single and ready to mingle”.  They only met in person on 8 April, after being on Facebook communicating with her several times, and he picked her up at a hotel parking lot and going to plaintiff’s home.   Defendant brought her little girl to his home too. 

Defendant says plaintiff gave her alcohol, and the car keys, and she was going to visit a friend at midnight when the accident happened. 

The car was wrecked on 11 April.   Defendant says she was driving plaintiff’s car, when a truck was on her side of the road, and hit her head on.    Police report say defendant was drunk when she wrecked plaintiff’s car.

Plaintiff old to box the clothes defendant left at his home, and mail them, after defendant returns his house keys

$1875 to plaintiff.

I groaned right along with Judge Judy. Is this the way people live their lives? I must be a prude.

[CrazyInAlabama]

(All week, 4 p.m. reruns are 2013, and 5 p.m. reruns are 2016)-

4 p.m. reruns-

First (2013)-

Mom Thrown Out of Courtroom!  -Plaintiff Kyle Grant suing defendant/former friend Leah Hensel for repayment of a loan to take several people out for a birthday dinner.   Plaintiff claims defendant repaid him with a bad check.    Defendant denies plaintiff ever gave her any money, and claims the $250 check she wrote plaintiff was so they could all take her boyfriend out for his birthday dinner, but just to show plaintiff’s mother (no, it doesn’t make sense to me either).     

 Plaintiff’s mother is given the Byrd boot, after she won’t stop shaking her head like a bobble head doll, and because she’s arguing, and talking back to JJ.  Plaintiff Mommy keeps saying “No” when Byrd boots her, and I wish he really had booted her.

 Defendant claims it was a loan, and plaintiff wasn’t supposed to cash the $250 check, but plaintiff cashed it anyway, and it bounced.   

Defendant’s explanation of why the check was a loan is bizarre, and how it wasn’t supposed to be cashed.   Litigants claim they both went to the casino, with the ex-boyfriend, and remembers nothing.  Then defendant wrote the rubber check.

JJ points out the liars on this show sometimes end up with a red chest, like defendant has now.

(I loathe the defendant for taking advantage of the compromised plaintiff)

Plaintiff receives $250. 

Ex-Lover’s Excuse -Plaintiff Nancy Victorioso suing defendant /Ex-boyfriend John  Allen, for three loans that total $2300, and the first two loans weren’t paid back.   $2,000 down payment was for defendant’s truck, and he says a truck loan was a gift.

Defendant claims he never asked plaintiff for the money, that she offered, and said he didn’t have to pay it back.

$2,000 (I think) to plaintiff.   I wouldn’t have given her a penny, he never paid a penny back, so she had no expectation of repayment.

Second (2013)-

Baby Daddy Drama -Plaintiff SSMOO (Sainted Single Mother of Two, one with defendant) Renee LeBlanc is suing defendant/baby daddy Andrew Tremblay.  Plaintiff wants half of a joint loan ($1200) they took out to afford their apartment.    Defendant says plaintiff moved out early, breaching their agreement, and he owes her nothing on the one-year lease.   Defendant says it was illegal eviction, and breaching the lease.  Loan was for first month’s rent and security. 

Plaintiff moved out after two months, and defendant had another lease to put the apartment in his name.   Defendant says they had a verbal argument, and plaintiff called the police, claiming he was abusing her.      The litigants weren’t getting along, and broke up after two months of living together.     They were arguing constantly, and then plaintiff called the police.   Plaintiff claims she was in fear for her life, and didn’t want defendant around their child (as usual, she calls the one child “hers”). 

Plaintiff claims she has sole legal custody of their child, and she controls when defendant sees the child.  Guess how well that went over with JJ?     When baby daddy was told to leave the house by plaintiff, then he claims she illegally evicted him.     JJ has to explain that both parents have equal rights to the child.     Then defendant called landlord, to apologize if the police woke up the 1st floor tenant that night, tenant is landlord’s mother.

Landlord was kind enough to cancel the first lease, and defendant signed another lease with landlord, for the same rent.  Defendant claims he’s had an issue getting another roommate.     Defendant fell behind on child support because he had to pay plaintiff’s half of the rent.   

Plaintiff case dismissed. (She’s told to take the $1200 out of her child support).  Defendant gets $450 for half of the rent for one month.

Fight Over a Puppy -Plaintiff Kerry Dial is suing for dog care costs and harassment, defendant /sister Angelia Dial suing over harassment, a hospital bill.     Plaintiff wants defendant / sister to pay more for the puppy than the original purchase price.    What the hell is a Tiny Toy Mini Schnauzer?   After a year defendant gave the plaintiff the puppy, and wanted to be paid for the dog. Puppy originally cost $450 from a breeder.     When the dog was a year old, defendant wanted plaintiff to pay her more for the puppy than the original $450.   

Defendant was offering the dog for $500, and claims the sister offered her $500.   Dog also was being sold with dog clothes, and shoes. 

When the fight over a Tiny Toy Mini Schnauzer heats up in court, the defendant storms out of the courtroom.    When the defendant stomps out, she does get the correct exit, I bet someone pointed the way.   Plaintiff says the sister harassed her so much, she gave the dog back to defendant.

$450 to plaintiff, the original purchase price of the puppy. 

5 p.m. reruns-

First (2016)-

World's Greatest Landlord-Plaintiff /landlord Randy Myerson suing defendant / former tenant Alexandra Kerns,  for unpaid loan, bailing her out of jail.      Defendant arrested for DUI, and bail was $2,000.  Defendant claims landlord said he would buy her a car, and she says it would be included in the rent.  Car was always in his name, so he wants toll fees, impound fees, etc.   Landlord swears he didn't have ulterior motives towards tenant.   As JJ says, he should have repossessed the car, or reported it stolen.    (He was shocked after the DUI that she came home drunk, kept drinking, and assaulted him).   

Plaintiff gets $2,000 for bail back.

Online Attorney Fraud-Plaintiff /former client LaTanya Sharp  suing former "attorney"/defendant Lucia “Lucy” Lopez,  for lying about being an attorney, ripping her off for creating a trust, and modifying a previous trust, and failure to return documents.   

Defendant is not an attorney.    JJ had proof in a Facebook message that defendant was asked if they are a paralegal or an attorney, and the defendant said she's an attorney.   Defendant claims plaintiff was sent a binder of documents, and refused to sign for package.   

$200 to plaintiff. 

Second (2016)-

Double Baby Daddy Drama-Plaintiff Lisa Johnson suing defendant Azeri Paige for windshield damage and an assault. Both litigants have a kid with the same man.   Idiot baby daddy, Gary, is witness for plaintiff, so I guess she got custody of baby daddy.   Plaintiff claimed at the time of the assault the plaintiff was on and off, with Gary.  However, she told police they weren’t ‘on’.    Plaintiff is suing for damage to her car, and an assault.  Defendant claims harassment, and vandalism of her car by plaintiff.   

Right after midnight plaintiff, and baby daddy were boinking, a call keeps hitting his phone, and plaintiff answers the phone.   Caller is defendant, who is pissed.   Right after call, defendant is at the door at plaintiff's home.    911 is called, defendant assaulted plaintiff, and police report was filed.    Plaintiff's car's back window was smashed. 

According to police both litigants were drunk, and so was baby daddy.       Defendant had a friend with her at the assault, and claims she never touched plaintiff, or the car.  Defendant claims she wasn't at the plaintiff's assault, but was at her mother's home, out of town.     Defendant is such a liar, and claims plaintiff has been harassing her for years, and is a liar.  Defendant’s witness is her fiance.  

Plaintiff submits photos of her bruises and scratches.   Defendant is court ordered by Champaign Co. IL court to not be around his child with her, except with supervision.   Plaintiff witness says he sees kids all of the time, and can be around his kids, and lives with plaintiff.

$1500 for plaintiff for car window, and assault.  

Go Bang Your Heads Against a Wall-Plaintiff Courtney Smith suing ex-boyfriend/defendant Brandon Brooks over unpaid loans, a car, unpaid rent, and utilities.   

There are text messages from defendant admitting he owed the $700 to plaintiff.   

Plaintiff was 17 when she started living with defendant.   Plaintiff is pregnant, claims it’s not defendant’s baby, ist estranged from him, and living with her mother.

Defendant was loaned $700, to buy Audi to flip, and for half the profits, but car wasn't sold.    Plaintiff claims she paid for the Hyundai.  Defendant says he bought Hyundai for $500.    She registered the car in her name.  So, they each have a car with a title in each name.   Plaintiff had $1300, and loaned $700 to defendant.  

However, plaintiff committed fraud when she registered the car, by forging defendant's name.  Plaintiff committed perjury (for signing a false statement on a government document), and forgery when she registered the car in her name.   

Plaintiff had baby, and claims it's not defendant's kid.   They'll have to fight that out in Family Court after DNA tests.

$700 to plaintiff. 

[CrazyInAlabama]

4 p.m. reruns-

First (2013)-

Victim of Racism or a Thief? -Plaintiff Jason Jones suing defendant/store owner Pavinder Singh for accusing him of being a thief, and assaulting him.   Defendant claims plaintiff is a panhandler, and thief.   Plaintiff claims defendant’s wife handed defendant a metal pipe, and claims defendant assaulted him.

Plaintiff claims defendant stole his cell phone two or three weeks before the assault.    Then on the day of the supposed assault, plaintiff and his friends were hanging out around the store, eating lunch, and says that was when defendant attacked him.    Plaintiff is a day laborer, and gets public assistance, but not a steady job.    

Defendant says plaintiff is a panhandler, who usually comes in the store when defendant’s wife is working alone, and claims plaintiff is often drunk, and stealing, and panhandling at the store.  Defendant’s story is plaintiff was drunk, panhandling, accused him of stealing his phone, and when defendant said he was calling the police, was when plaintiff attacked him.  

Police report says plaintiff’s friend confirmed that they had been trespassed off the property previously, that plaintiff was there to buy alcohol, that store owner told them both to get off the property, confirms plaintiff attacked the defendant, and injuries of both litigants were consistent with what the defendant said.    Defendant did pick up a bat to defend himself.

Plaintiff’s mother is his witness, and JJ and the mother discuss the son’s/plaintiff’s alcohol problems.  

Plaintiff receives $1 for defendant defending himself. (this was filmed in 2013, I wonder where plaintiff is now?)

Second (2013)-

Storage Wars -Plaintiff/ex-boyfriend Elijaha Alexander suing defendant /ex-girlfriend Jessica Sundeen  for the return of his furniture.   Defendant is counter suing for crashing her car, and for the loan.   She’s holding on to his furniture until he pays her $1500 for a loan she claims she made to him.   Plaintiff denies defendant loaned him anything.     Plaintiff stored his big TV, and furniture, in defendant’s storage unit, and defendant claims furniture was collateral for the loan.   Loan was supposedly made after the furniture storage happened, and while they were still dating.

Defendant received a past due settlement from social security disability, for $30,250.    Defendant claims she kept some of the money at her home in an envelope.   Defendant calls plaintiff a liar, and a convicted felon.  Defendant has no proof of the money she loaned plaintiff.  JJ doesn’t believe either litigant’s story.    

Plaintiff has five days to send movers to pick up his furniture, and his TV with the Marshal’s assistance.  Defendant case dismissed.  

Dog Struck by Car -Plaintiff/driver Anthony Mesker suing defendants/dog owners Tonya and Wade Watson for car damages.   Defendant is counter suing for vet bills, claiming the dog was in defendant’s long driveway, and plaintiff drove on defendant’s driveway and hit the dog. (I’m not kidding, that’s what the defendant husband’s story is.).  Defendant wife claims plaintiff must have driven off of the interstate, and cut across defendant’s yard. 

Plaintiff was driving home, says dog was in the road, and off defendant’s property.  

Plaintiff says he thinks he’s seen the dog two times before the accident, once far from the defendants’ home, and once in their yard.    The dog is a Beagle, and defendant wife claims the invisible fence collar keeps her dog on the property.  No, it doesn’t, not with a Beagle. 

Later, plaintiff saw the injured dog on defendants’ property.    

My understanding is that your dog off leash, or running loose leads to car repair bills for the owner, then dog owner will have to pay for car damages, and you pay your own vet bills.   

Plaintiff receives $1,088 for car damages.  Defendants’ case dismissed.

5 p.m. reruns-

First (2016)-

The Ever-Changing Dog Attack Story-Plaintiff Alberto Nunez, suing defendants/dog owners Lourdes Rodriguez, and husband Joe Rivera for son’s medical bills, over their dog attack on a little boy.      10-year-old boy, Samuel  Nunez, was attacked by defendant's vicious dog.   Defendant keeps changing how it happened, denies boy was bitten, and it was all boy's fault.   Defendant is another disgusting dog owner who blames the victim for everything.    Defendant woman claims no bite happened, so how did the little boy end up with a big scar, and rabies shots.

Defendant child sits in the chair of justice, and tells JJ what happened.   Child was walking home from school, defendant had baby stroller, and dog on leash.     Child was bitten, had four shots on the day of the attack, until the rabies shot record was discovered.     Defendant didn't ever tell anyone about her dog attacking the little boy, then someone from animal control/police found out that there was another attack the next day by the same dog, on another person.    

Defendant's lie is that she saw child approaching, she claims that she told child to go around her other side, claims the dog was only barking at the child, and didn't bite him.    What a despicable liar she is.    Affidavit by defendant directly contradicts her court statement, and claims child attacked her dog.   

Plaintiff father found the dog the next day, by someone hunting for the owner of a dog from a second attack on the second day, after the little boy was attacked.    The second attack, on another dog, is blamed on the other dog. 

 In the second case, nothing was done because the attack was on another dog.       (In many states, the attack or death of another animal does not lead to charges against the owner, no matter how predatory the animal is). 

JJ tries to get through to the defendants that their baby is in danger from this jealous dog, but defendants still claim that everything was a money grab by plaintiff's father, and nothing was their fault.

Out of pocket was $1.346 for the child’s medical bills, and plaintiff gets that.    

Fumigation Fence War-Plaintiff Barbara Fuscsick suing home owner/defendant Robert Milner for car insurance deductible for damages from his fence falling on her car.     Defendant is plaintiff’s neighbor, had his house fumigated, and tented.   Plaintiff claims her fence was knocked over by the tent, and the fence hit her car.   Plaintiff wants her $500 deductible.   

Defendant is blaming the fence falling down, on plaintiff’s landlord not replacing the fence.   Defendant claims the insurance for his homeowners, and the fumigation company should have worked this out between them.     Why didn't the defendant just pay the $500?   

$500 to plaintiff. 

Second (2016)-

Rottweiler Puppy Fail- Plaintiff Phillip Taylor suing defendant Dwayne Gray for the cost of two puppies sold by defendant. Plaintiff was selling a Rottweiler dog (18 months old) that was getting aggressive towards his wife.   Plaintiff bought the puppy for $400, and wanted to sell dog for $800.   Defendant offered $300, and one puppy, pick of litter (defendant used to  breed lots of Rottweilers). 

Defendant wasn't told about the aggression. 

Defendant says dog wasn't aggressive in his home, and he later stopped breeding dogs.  Defendant's mother had cancer, and he sold the adult dogs, and gave the puppies away.   Defendant sold his registered Rottie for $200, and only sold one puppy, and gave the rest away.   Defendant claims he couldn't get in touch with the plaintiff to give him one puppy, and defendant says plaintiff wanted two puppies.   

Plaintiff wants $1600 for the puppies, for his unregistered female he sold for $300, and one puppy that he never picked up.   Plaintiff actually wanted to train the first aggressive, disobedient Rottie to be a certified service dog. 

Plaintiff gets $400.

Pro-Bono Publicist Scam-Plaintiff Julieen Beshere was hired to do publicity for defendant, Christine Fischetti for unpaid wages.   Defendant says she was never supposed to pay plaintiff.   

 First requirement was flyers, and social media for defendant's management company.    Defendant claims plaintiff wanted to create a magazine to promote the performance artists she promotes.   Defendant claims she had 300 clients, but it's all pro bono (she's on disability, and lives off of her spouse's wages).   There is no signed, written contract.   Plaintiff claims she was to be paid $60 per leaflet produced (=$600), and also says defendant wrote horrible allegations on social media about her.  Plaintiff gets $600 wages.   Plaintiff filed for a protective order against defendant, but it was never served on defendant.    

Plaintiff had nothing to do with the music business before the defendant.   So, her magazine she started about the music industry was from her experience with the defendant.   As usual, defendant claims her accounts were hacked, and everything was someone else's fault.       The defendant says plaintiff shouldn't make money off of the music industry, because she's not doing it pro bono, and claims plaintiff stole her identity, and bullied her, counter claim dismissed.       

Plaintiff gets $600 back wages, 

[Back Atcha]

3 hours ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

JJ tries to get through to the defendants that their baby is in danger from this jealous dog, but defendants still claim that everything was a money grab by plaintiff's father, and nothing was their fault.

Out of pocket was $1.346 for the child’s medical bills, and plaintiff gets that. 

Handsome Mr. Rodriguez, one of the defendants explains to us after the decision, that the plaintiff just "wants money."  So, Mr. Rodriguez, if your darling baby girl is bitten by a strange dog and has a chunk taken out or her cheek--or something much less, BUT  has to endure rabies treatments...you might understand that it's NOT always about the money!

[CrazyInAlabama]

4 p.m. reruns-

First (2013)-

Handicapped and Handcuffed -Plaintiffs Jeffrey and Christine Collins are suing defendants Lan Pham (wife) and Hoang Tran (husband) for being neighborhood nuisances, over harassment, cost of surveillance equipment they put in because of defendants’ constant parties, and vandalism.   The defendant woman who requires a wheelchair denies she’s a retaliatory nuisance, but after police were called, she’s shown on video being arrested.    Plaintiffs claim defendants were a pain from day one, with their dog running loose, loud, constant parties, and harassment of the plaintiffs and other neighbors.  Chihuahua owned by defendant was running loose, and disappeared.   

Plaintiff husband says defendants have at least three weekend long parties in their garage a month, until every early in the morning.    Plaintiffs finally called police about noise, and then their property would get egged, vandalism, and retaliatory actions.   So, plaintiff bought a security system, which fortunately caught the arrest of defendant woman by police.    Barking dog at defendant’s is not a Chihuahua either, it’s a much bigger dog, German Shepherd.      Defendant woman claims she was detained, not arrested, but her friend was arrested.  Defendant woman claims her friend was released without charges.    

(Since this was 2013, I hope defendants moved out of the neighborhood since this.  Unfortunately, the really bad neighbors almost never move).   

Defendant woman lies, and says they would cut back on noise if plaintiffs asked them.   She actually thinks it’s fine if the police come by at least once during every party.   German Shepherd only lives in the garage, and is never inside.    Defendant woman claims a dog that’s never in the house is her therapy dog.  Defendant woman claims plaintiffs are harassing her.

Plaintiffs receive $5,000.    Defendant case dismissed.

Don’t Tell People I Have Lupus -Plaintiff Naomi Ruiz suing defendant/roommate Damaris Martinez for unpaid rent and bills.     Defendant, who has Lupus claims that plaintiff/roommate’s gossiping about her medical condition to other roommates is the reason she can no longer live with plaintiff, and the other roommates.  However, defendant just told 10 million people about her medical condition.

Rent was supposed to be split three ways, then defendant stopped paying the rent, and utilities.   Defendant didn’t pay $2560, for four months rent. Defendant claims plaintiff would pay the rent for her.

Officer Byrd was paying defendant’s student loan money, and he’s sick of it.   (Notice JJ never pays anyone’s bills, but her own).

Defendant filed for punitive damages, and harassment for telling roommates about her Lupus.

$2560 to plaintiff.  Defendant’s counter claim dismissed.

Second (2013)-

Rent Free and Smoking Pot? -Plaintiff /daughter Kristina Gach suing defendant/mother Kathleen Gach, for return of rent, painting expenses, and moving costs Plaintiff, boyfriend Teddy, and baby moved in with plaintiff’s mother, and are now suing her for everything back.   Defendant woman accuses adult daughter and boyfriend of smoking pot in her house, and trashing the place.  Plaintiff claims mother was going to return collected rent to give her a nest egg.   Plaintiff and boyfriend haven’t married over the three years since baby was born, because the time isn’t right.     Plaintiff claims their car was stolen and stripped, and they moved it to mother’s house, to work on the car.      Plaintiff also claims mother paid her $80 each day she cleaned the mother’s house.   Defendant is counter claiming for cleaning fees, unpaid rent, and stolen property.

Defendant claims plaintiff wanted to move into the downstairs apartment, until they could qualify for low-income housing, bet that’s another reason they didn’t marry.    Plaintiffs now live with boyfriend’s mother now. 

Plaintiff claims another cleaning client pays her $145 for four hours work, for once-a- month cleaning.   JJ trots out the “your mother will always be there for you, when boyfriend is long gone” speech.

Plaintiff gets $800 for her rent back (bet it was gone before the week was out).

Ex-Fiancee Fiasco -Plaintiff Bryan McClarnan suing defendant Janine Crosswhite for money owed on a car loan, and for vehicle damage.    Plaintiff made the down payment, and say defendant stopped paying.   JJ has to try to explain to defendant what deferred payments, and the need to repay a loan.  Deferred payments mean they get put on the end of the loan.    

After they split defendant had the car for two years, and deferred the payments for part of the loan.   Defendant says if she knew plaintiff would want the money for car payments, then she would have let the loan holder repo the car.   This would have ruined the plaintiff’s credit.   Defendant has a six-year loan, and gave the car back to plaintiff after it was having issues from the wreck damage.  She missed (deferred) eight payments.

Plaintiff gets $2928, for eight missed payments, and repairs.

5 p.m. reruns-

First (2016)-

Icy Road Spin Scare-Plaintiff Lani Rupp suing ex-boyfriend/defendant Alexander Muriera for damaging her car while he was borrowing it, $2400.     According to plaintiff they had a huge, violent fight, over the damage to her car.  Then he moved in with roommates a few blocks from her house.   

Defendant was driving plaintiff's vehicle, was on I-70, spun out, and pulled on the median with minor damage (plaintiff's photo shows major wheel well damage, and passenger side front fender and bumper damage).  Defendant calls the damage to plaintiff’s vehicle ‘minor cosmetic damage’.  

Defendant claims his Jeep was damaged while plaintiff was driving it, and that was before the first fight about her car.   Defendant claims they fought over the car, but there was another fight outside his place, and that's when the second fight about his car happened.    Defendant claims they had a later fight, and she threw her phone at his car, and broke the windshield.    JJ tells them to fix their own cars, neither one had collision insurance.      

Cases dismissed.  

Dune Buggy Bamboozle-Plaintiffs Elizabeth and Shawn Roland bought a dune buggy from defendant, Thomas Spiers, and are suing for a refund.   They claim it wasn't the one they wanted, and finally returned it to defendant.  Defendant claims it was returned damaged, plaintiffs say (according to defendant).    Defendant wants money for repairing dune buggy.   

Apparently, the defendant's company shipped the wrong dune buggy to the plaintiffs, and defendant says plaintiffs were fine with that.  Plaintiffs say defendant is a liar.

Defendant says main difference between two buggies is color, and side panels, plus buggy was a floor model.   Plaintiffs say they never used the buggy, but defendant says it was used. 

Plaintiffs get money back $4921.   

Second (2016)-

Parking Insanity Caught on Tape-Plaintiff Lori Hansen is suing defendant Georgette Davenport for medical bills, and damages from parking lot fight caught on video.    Plaintiff was arrested, and video shows plaintiff was the aggressor, and assaulted the defendant.    Defendant says plaintiff whacked her car door into defendant's car, twice.  Lori Hansen, (she's the one on the ad for the show with JJ saying she's not scary), plaintiff parked almost on top of the parking space line, you can clearly see that on video.   All of this apparently happened in front of the liquor store.  Defendant claims plaintiff started choking her, and broke her phone. 

On video, poor feeble defendant isn't using her cane, and claims she doesn't always need it.    Defendant has police report, and JJ saw on video that Lori H. struck the first blow, and kept hitting, and trying to choke the defendant.   

Plaintiff case dismissed.  For some bizarre reason, hall-terview is with plaintiff's husband. 

Single Mom Mess-Plaintiff Jean Massey was being evicted, and defendant Teresa Carter agreed to let plaintiff and her children move into her house.   Rent for two rooms was $600, and claims she paid $694.  Plaintiff moved stuff into the garage, and defendant said plaintiff couldn't stay, and plaintiff agreed to pay utilities.    Plaintiff demanded to do more than month-to-month to save more money to move on.     Plaintiff decided not to move in, and was going to get her stuff out of the garage, but wanted her money back.   

Plaintiff wasn't arrested on the day in question, but was on parole.   Defendant signed agreement in front of police officer that she would return the $694.    Plaintiff is suing because defendant filed a complaint for assault against plaintiff.    They did mediation first, and defendant didn't appear.    Defendant claims plaintiff damaged her garage door. 

$694 for plaintiff, defendant claim dismissed.

[CrazyInAlabama]

4 p.m. reruns-

First (2013)-

Break Up, Break In? -Plaintiff Guadalupe “Adrian” Arista suing defendant Monica Pena his ex-boyfriend’s sister-in-law accused him of breaking into her home.     Defendant claims she saw the plaintiff burglarizing her home, but he was acquitted at trial.    Plaintiff claims he doesn’t even know the defendant, but defendant claims she knows him well.   Defendant is counter claiming for the burglary, and the security precautions she installed after that.  

Defendant’s police report was defendant came home, the sliding door was open, plaintiff was hauling stuff out, pushed defendant to the ground, and defendant chased him with her car.  Defendant claims she knew him from seeing him with her brother-in-law, and knew his name (Adrian is plaintiff’s middle name). 

Plaintiff is told by JJ, that he has to prove that defendant identified him with malice, not that she just was mistaken.     Plaintiff says a month after he broke up with the boyfriend, the police came into his workplace, and arrested him.    Plaintiff says he never met the defendant before the arrest, but defendant claims she had met him before. 

I believe the plaintiff, and think the defendant is lying.    JJ asks defendant if brother-in-law was a drug user, and sometimes he was.   I think the defendant blames the plaintiff for the brother-in-law’s drug use, and it was retaliation.    Plaintiff also states that another suspect was arrested for the burglary, not too far from his house too.   

Plaintiff case dismissed, and defendant gets $2500.

Heroin Possession? -Plaintiff Lyn Klann suing defendant Kayla Wenz for repayment of bail.   Defendant was arrested for heroin possession, and plaintiff bailed her out of jail.  Defendant is giggling, and smirking when she says she thought the bail was a gift, and she didn’t need to repay it. 

Defendant claims after another arrest, jail and rehab, that she’s clean.

$1085 to plaintiff.

Second (2013)-

Money Stolen from a Thief? -Plaintiff Randall Thom suing defendant/house sitter/ex-girlfriend Linda Davis for charging $1800 on a credit card of plaintiff, and he allowed her $400 while she was house and pet sitting for him.   This all happened when plaintiff was house sitting for him, while he was in jail.  Defendant want to be paid for house and pet sitting. 

Plaintiff was jailed for theft, sentence was 90 days, but he got out after 37 days.   JJ rules that defendant’s ‘verbal contract’ with plaintiff wasn’t valid.

Defendant claims plaintiff did the charges just to make her look bad, and aren’t her charges, just because she signed them doesn’t mean anything to defendant.

$1500 to plaintiff for the charges.

Guilty of Domestic Violence -Plaintiff Anyssa  Ancona SSMOO (Sainted Single Mother of One) suing defendant Joseph Grimm  for breaking their apartment lease, and a false restraining order.   They signed the lease in 2008, and moved she moved out November 2008, and he moved in January 2009.    Defendant says it wasn’t a false restraining order, but he pled nolo contender, and had a year probation.   The restraining order was placed for a year after a hearing where the plea deal happened.   Plaintiff received a legit restraining order, but defendant’s attempt at restraining order was dismissed, and retaliatory.    It took a year and a half to get the garnishment started for child support.

Defendant was the reason the lease was broken, after the plea on the restraining order, and admitted assault.   $2000 was the lease breaking fee plaintiff paid.               (This all happened in 2008 and 2009, so why is the case dated 2013 for filming?).    Thank heavens the neighbors called police when they heard the fighting. 

$2000 to plaintiff.

5 p.m. reruns-

First (2016)-

Rage Against the Door-Plaintiff Myron Fulford suing ex-girlfriend/defendant SSMOO (Sainted Single Mother of One) Alexis Powers, for her attempt to break into his house, and damaging his door.    The attempted break in happened the day after they broke up, during a big argument at his house.   

He sent her a text that he would bring her belongings to a meeting place, but if she came to his house, then he would call the police.   As usual, defendant's phone was accidentally destroyed, and she has no texts.   Defendant claims she didn’t answer plaintiff’s texts.   (Note to defendant, that purple lipstick makes you look ugly, and cheap).  

Police were called when defendant tried to kick the door down.    Plaintiff lives with his young daughter, and brother, and I'm sure that child was terrified when this happened.     Defendant also had a 1-year-old child mixed in with this.   Defendant claims she lived with plaintiff, but contradicts herself in her statement.   Defendant only stayed the night at plaintiff’s house a few times. She brought a 1-year-old into this mess.   

Police incident report confirms the plaintiff’s testimony.  Defendant’s hall-terview is bizarre, even for this show.   Defendant pitches a hissy fit.

Plaintiff gets $600, defendant gets $0.

Convicted Felon Wants Guns Back-Plaintiff Tiffany Sullivan kept defendant/ex-boyfriend's Justin Dodd (he says ex-boyfriend, but they went through a divorce, very confusing) truck, a TV, and other property.     They are divorced, and he wants more visitation, or custody.   Defendant claims he only has supervised visitation, and wants more.     Litigants have a child, and are fighting about custody.

As usual, the next wife is defendant's witness.     Defendant mostly lived in the shed behind the house.    Defendant wants his BB guns back, and they are in the shed. 

Plaintiff wants her truck back, and she signed the truck over to him.    Truck was never re-registered in his name.    Defendant given two weeks to re-register the truck, or plaintiff gets it back.    Plaintiff is told to leave the BB guns at the local police precinct for him to pick up in the next two weeks, and police will decide if they are legal for him to possess (he's a convicted felon).  

Second (2016)-

Disorderly Cousin Conduct-Plaintiff Rebecca Wasson suing her cousin/former tenant Lisa Mitros  for unpaid rent, hotel fees, loss of rent, and police complaints after they moved in together.    Defendant was living with a boyfriend for four years in his house, there was a fire that caused damage, and they had to move out.   Cousin/plaintiff offered her main rental house with boyfriend for $1,000 a month until boyfriend's house was repaired.   

House wasn't repaired in time, and plaintiff wanted her usual $2500 a month summer rental.   Defendant claims rent would be $1k, but had to move out the end of May or else.   Defendant claims she moved May 28.   No proof of April or May rent is shown.  April check is $1,000 cash, and May is $1500 to cash.     Defendant is out of control in court. 

Defendant says she rented rear house when she was married before, on a year lease.    This time it was a seasonal rent.

Then case gets interesting.  Defendant claims plaintiff doesn't own house, doesn't rent main house, but lives in it herself in the summer season, and rents the back house out.  Defendant claims Rebecca with another last name is on the deed.  

 Plaintiff letter says she had complaints from the back house renters about disorderly conduct by defendant and boyfriend (4 police visits were documented).   Eviction action started in early-May, according to property manager, Francine Simonsen.    I see no relevance that plaintiff is leasing the house, instead of owns it.     Plaintiff lost over $6,000 in rental income due to defendant.

$2,000 back rent to plaintiff.   

Show Me the Proof-Plaintiff Anneliese Dahms suing former roommate/defendant Mar’keivus Fudge    for unpaid bills, damaged and stolen property, and cost of lock change.    Defendant signed a one-year lease, but moved after she changed the locks on him.   

Plaintiff claims she has photos proving defendant stole her property, but they don't show him with anything.    Plaintiff has zero proof, and simply won't shut up.   She has police reports, but claims that they are inaccurate.   

Case dismissed.  

[CrazyInAlabama]

4 p.m. reruns-

First (2013)-

Fight Over Troubled Teen’s Rehab -Plaintiffs Bayleigh Anderson, stepmother/current wife is suing defendant/child’s mother Melissa Lund over the $4,000 fees for teen’s rehab camp.    Father Jeffrey Anderson isn’t suing, stepmother is the driving force in this case, and JJ tells her it’s not her place.  (I couldn’t agree more with JJ about the stepmother’s butting in.   The stepmother is also the person who found the camp, and wanted the boy sent there).  

Jordan Anderson is the teen involved, fortunately he’s mostly in his mother’s custody.    Plaintiff buttinsky stepmother wants the mother’s half of the camp, $2000 back.

Plaintiff witness is her current husband, Anderson.    Anderson and Lund have two children together, Lund has four children, and plaintiffs are producing more offspring.   Child was removed from four of eight classes last year for behavior, but child wasn’t tested for more educational or learning disabilities, because the father doesn’t have medical insurance to cover the child.   Ex-wife lost her job, and has no insurance.  Defendant mother says father gave her a long list of requirements that she had to fulfill for father to get insurance extended to his children with defendant.   

Plaintiff father wants mother/ex-wife to pay part of his medical premiums, and father refused to pay at all for son’s braces a few years ago.    Plaintiff’s new child will have the plaintiff’s health insurance, but the children plaintiff father dumped have no insurance.   Father’s reason is court didn’t order him to cover the children’s medical and dental bills.   Defendant says the plaintiffs always drag her to court, but don’t have custody, just a little visitation.

Plaintiffs want defendant to get free health insurance for his former children through the state, but plaintiff, wife/stepmother, and their child will have paid health insurance.

Stepmother claims that mother/defendant didn’t perform the agreed on protocol to make the son perform better.

So, stepmother can’t get custody and other rules changed in family court, but she drags the defendant to JJ’s court.   I bet the local family court judges are sick of plaintiffs.   Father claims his 90-minute driving distance from where his minor children with defendant live, means it’s too hard on him to see them often.    (Since this case was 2013, then both children are old enough not to be bothered by plaintiffs).

Father claims he knows more about his children than the mother does.   Recent custody case by plaintiffs to change custody and rules, was turned down by the court.   My guess is after new baby arrived, visitation and any interest in the previous wife’s children ended.

Plaintiff case dismissed.   For one thing, stepmother had no standing to bring this case.   Father still doesn’t understand that he should cover his two children with medical insurance.  Father is an IT analyst, and stepmother is an insurance agent.

Second (2013)-

Cat Fight and Crash! -Plaintiff /security guard John Couch Terrance Cowan suing defendant Devesha Thomas and her brother Terrance Cowan.     Altercation in a nightclub parking lot results in a three-vehicle collision and a security guard’s suit for damages to his car.  Plaintiff’s witness is another security guard at the nightclub.       Plaintiff and witness were in plaintiff’s car, at the nightclub where they worked, when defendant Devesha Thomas driving her brother’s car (he’s Terrance Cowan), without insurance, hit the plaintiff’s car, and another security guard’s car.   Ms. Thomas had insurance, but forgot to pay the bill.    Defendant, and her girlfriend were leaving the club at 2:30 a.m., having a fist fight in the car, when the defendant hit the car owned by plaintiff.      Head of security took defendant’s phony insurance information, and didn’t do a report on the wreck.

Defendant woman wants $5,000 for a car her brother bought in 2010 for $900.

Plaintiff submits the information from defendant’s insurance card the night of the accident.  Card said that insurance lapsed a month before the incident.

Defendant case dismissed.  Defendant still says the accident wasn’t her fault, JJ and everyone who ever saw this case disagree with that.    Police didn’t do a report, because the parking lot is private property (Yes, that’s how it works in some states).

Plaintiff witness says both women in defendant’s car were still fighting, and were dragged out of the car.

Plaintiff gets $3000 for his car damages.

5 p.m. reruns-

First (2016)-

Cyclist in the Pedestrian Crossing Smash-Plaintiff/bicyclist Mitchell Eastwood suing defendant/motorist Bryan Anderson for hitting him, while cyclist was in a crosswalk.  Plaintiff was on bike path, came to crosswalk (it's part of a greenway bike path), stopped to check for traffic, and when plaintiff was in the crosswalk, defendant hit him.     There is a sign on crosswalk that says it is a state law to yield to  pedestrians, and cyclists in the crosswalk.   

There are no medical records of injury to the plaintiff.   Defendant doesn't care that he could have killed a person, just that he thinks he would have been right in his own mind.  Police report says plaintiff did nothing wrong, but defendant violated right of way for crosswalk.    Defendant was driving his sister-in-law's vehicle, and was insured.  Defendant claims he didn't hit the cyclist, and he's such a jerk.   Police did not cite the defendant, which is wrong of them.

Because Minnesota is a no fault state, plaintiff would have to claim his own homeowner’s insurance, raising his rate.

Plaintiff gets $550 for damage to his bike.

Neighbor from Hell-Plaintiff Linda Pierce suing neighbor/defendant Mark Perrotte for money owed for a car $500, and harassment.    Defendant claims car was a gift, and plaintiff was neighbor from hell, and wants $2,000 for plaintiff filing a false restraining order.   Defendant's car broke down, and plaintiff sold him a car for $500 (defendant says it was a gift).  Defendant has car, registered in his name, and JJ tells him to sign over the title, and give the car back.   Defendant given choice, either pay the $500, or sign the car back and return it.   (My view, plaintiff though befriending neighbor would work out much better for her than it did).    

Plaintiff has several police reports claiming harassment, and applications for protective orders (dismissed after hearing).  In defendant's place, I would try to find somewhere else to live, not near the plaintiff.  Records show both complained to police often, and all restraining orders dismissed.

 I bet she's still bothering him, and his kids.    $500 to plaintiff for car.  $4500 for harassment dismissed.

$500 to plaintiff for the car.      

Second (2016)-

Mechanic Crosses a Line-Plaintiff /car seller Jamaica Miller suing former friend/defendant DeAndre Walton for value of car, $500 and the cost to fix the car, totalling $1200.     Plaintiff has teenage son, bought a car for son, gave it to mechanic to fix it, plaintiff moved to Houston.    Defendant towed car to plaintiff's father's house, it wasn't registered, had no bill of sale, no tags.   Defendant was going to register the car, by putting a mechanic's lien on it, and confiscating it.   The title was in a previous owner's name, not the woman that sold it to plaintiff.   

Plaintiff paid only the money to put the mechanic's lien on the car to get a clean title, $190.   Car title is in defendant's name, and he will sign it over to plaintiff.    Defendant got car running, and told her it would cost her $200 to have car fixed.   The mechanics lien was a scam to get a clean title, because plaintiff didn't have the right paperwork.   

Defendant has the clean title.  Car is in plaintiff’s father’s back yard, but she now lives in Houston.

I plaintiff wants the car back she pays $200 to defendant, and gets the title. 

Plaintiff will pay $200 to defendant, and title is signed over to plaintiff.

Unbelievable Car Deal-Plaintiff Chantia Edwards suing former friend /defendant Jay Campbell for return of money she paid for a 2006 Chevy Impala.   Plaintiff bought car from defendant for $2200, and paid in full.   However, defendant needed to make one more payment on his car loan, and he would have a clear title.   A few weeks later plaintiff's car was repossessed by lender.   Defendant says she agreed to pay him $2200, and make the four remaining payments on car (he only bought the car a couple of months before he sold it to the plaintiff).   The Blue Book value is $6,000, he put $1500 down, and payments were less than $300 a month, so there were a ton of payments left.   

JJ says they were scammers, and plaintiff claims she didn't know the car was worth $6,000, that she thought she was getting it for $2200.   

JJ gives nothing to either litigant, and that's what they deserve.   I think the defendant was hiding the car out at the plaintiff's place, and the lender found it and repossessed it. 

Edited September 27, 2021 by CrazyInAlabama

[Rdh]

I will tell you everything i can remember...

I first saw this episode probably around or close to 20 years ago. (Between 2000-2002)

It was an african american woman(plaintiff) and an african american male defendant.

From what i remember he claimed to be blind. I remember him saying something like "i heard this noise, and i said, whats that? She said Leroy, i said whats Leroy? She said it was a vibrator"

"She said, i want you to feel this, so i put my finger in the jar, i said whats that? She said MARIJUANA."

The the court plays a recording of the police call and while the woman was giving a decsription of the defendant, you can hear him in the backgroung helping her give the description to the operator.

She says something like, hes a black male, 30 years old, and you hear him say in the background "220 pounds!"

This was the most hilarious episode i had ever see. I only say it 1 time and then never again.

Does anyone know what episode? Season? Year? Or if its anywhere to whatch?

I would love to see it again..

 

[CrazyInAlabama]

All week the 4 p.m. reruns are either 2012, or 2013, and all of the 5 p.m. are 2016.   

4 p.m. reruns-

First (2013)-

Maltese Attack- Plaintiff/dog bite victim Jeneth Rundle, is suing defendant/dog owner Sabrina Fisher over a Maltese attack on plaintiff by defendant’s dog.   Plaintiff wants medical bills, and her pants replaced.   Plaintiff says the two dogs were on a leash, but the leashes were trailing behind the dogs on the ground, and not held by defendant.   Defendant was walking her dog, and her mother’s two dogs.

Plaintiff says after the bite the defendant grabbed her dog and was saying “What will happen to my dog?”.     Defendant was letting the three dogs wander the beach with the leashes dragging behind them.    Plaintiff says there were several people, including the mother, with the defendant.   Defendant mother denies say anything about the dog biting, and just like her defendant daughter tries to minimize the plaintiff’s injuries.    Plaintiff shows a photo of her leg, and it’s a lot more than what defendant mother calls ‘not even a nick’.    

Animal control took two weeks to get a report to plaintiff saying the dogs’ shots were up to date.   Dogs didn’t have a license, and it was almost three weeks later that defendant got proof of rabies.    How disgusting that defendant waited three weeks to get proof of rabies vaccination to the plaintiff via Animal Control.    When plaintiff asked defendant if she had rabies vaccination records, defendant says she didn’t have the records.   JJ asks if the beach is supposed to have dogs on it.   There is a city ordnance that from 9:00 a.m. to 5 p.m. there are not supposed to be dogs on the beach, so defendants were breaking the rules.   Plaintiff has a photo of the dog ordnance sign.    Leashed dogs only from 5 p.m. to 9 a.m.

Plaintiff receives $1,500.

Mother-in-Law Thief?  -Plaintiff Cassie Hochhalter suing defendant/mother-in-law Marie Hochhalter for $4,000 for a car repo'd by her MIL, and plaintiff claims she paid every penny to MIL.   Plaintiff claims the MIL stole the car.  MIL was on the car title, and plaintiff claims she paid MIL for the car, and car was repo'd by MIL, and then rolled and totaled by plaintiff's husband, son of defendant.  

Plaintiff and husband are reconciling, and not divorcing.   JJ can't give the car back to plaintiff, because husband of plaintiff /son of defendant totaled it, and it was junked.   Husband was alleged to be drunk when he wrecked the car.   

Defendant wants money she put into the car, and that’s dismissed. As JJ says, plaintiff is suing the wrong person and should be suing her husband.

Plaintiff case dismissed.

Second (2012)-

Ex-Lover Restraining Order -Plaintiff Neil Johnson suing defendant/ex-girlfriend Amy Reed for an unpaid utility bill, $300.   Defendant has a restraining order against the plaintiff, and plaintiff is looking at six months in jail if he violates the order.   

There was a temporary order against plaintiff, issued by the court in Hooksett, New Hampshire, for threatening, property destruction, 200 texts in a few days, harassment.   Plaintiff was arrested for violating the order, and if he violates the order again, he gets six months in jail.

JJ tells plaintiff that pursuing the defendant for $300, after the restraining order, with six months hanging over his head, is ridiculous.   It’s just to get defendant in the same room.  Defendant looks like she’s going to cry.     She still lives in the same apartment.

Plaintiff gets $300 for the utility bills.

Ex-Boyfriend vs. Ex-Boyfriend -Plaintiffs David Haury, and Anthony Asher are suing defendant /Haury’s former boyfriend Nicholas Allen, for false arrest for domestic violence.   Defendant claim dismissed.    JJ also says defendant couldn’t be evicted by plaintiff pushing him out of the apartment, and also tried to get the defendant arrested.    Plaintiff Haury was arrested for domestic violence, for shoving defendant out of the apartment, so false arrest claim is dismissed.  This was in Grant’s Pass, Oregon.

JJ boots defendant’s witness out of court for butting in. 

Plaintiff Asher is booted, and his case is dismissed.  

Officer Byrd has to tell defendant to stop making comments without being asked a question.

Then, JJ has to tell Asher, and Allen to stop making remarks to each other, and dismisses everything. 

5 p.m. reruns-

First (2016)-

Assault of the Landlord-Plaintiff Deborah Smith is suing defendant Marshall Smith for illegal eviction, changing the locks, and stolen property.     Defendant had the woman pet sit three years ago, and a year ago the woman told defendant she was a general contractor.  

Defendant paid her $25,000 to be general contractor for the roof replacement, and other work.      He says she never did any work, isn't a contractor, and has been on disability since 1992.   Plaintiff claimed she wasn’t paid to be a general contractor.   

Plaintiff claims her disability ended in 2015, but won't answer any of JJ's questions, so her case is dismissed.    Officer Byrd has to tell the plaintiff to stop commenting during the defendant's testimony. 

Defendant says he let her stay in the spare room occasionally, since she lived so far away.  She left for over three weeks, and when he noticed a bad odor from the room, he entered and found a lot of his stolen property.     

Plaintiff claims she was a tenant, illegally evicted, and wants $5,000 for garbage, and her case is dismissed.   

Defendant claims after he changed the locks, the plaintiff crawled under the house, into the basement,   broke in, and assaulted him, and stole his laptop.   Defendant filed a police report alleging assault by her, theft, and wanted a protective order. and changed the locks.   Plaintiff wanted a temporary protective order and was granted a one-year protective order.

Before JJ's court, there was a protective order hearing against defendant, and plaintiff was late to that court, and argued with the judge that she was actually in court the entire time. 

JJ advises the defendant to have his attorney ask a judge to file a vexatious litigant order against plaintiff.   

I feel sorry for defendant, because I bet the plaintiff is still bothering him.  

Cases dismissed. 

Pedestrian Slam in a Parking Lot-Plaintiff Matthew McMurtrie claims the defendant Hamid David Sadeghi hit him with his car in a parking lot.  Plaintiff is lucky he wasn't injured more.    

Defendant says he didn't do anything wrong, didn't even put in a claim with his insurance company, because he thinks nothing is wrong with the plaintiff.   Defendant says he doesn't really think he hit the plaintiff.  Plaintiff claims the defendant doesn't have insurance, but defendant claims he does.   Supposedly it's Geico, but the Gecko didn't show up in court to testify.   Plaintiff contacted an attorney over the medical bills, and defendant's refusal to give him the name of his insurance company. 

Defendant has video from the parking garage, but it isn't of the accident, just of the inside of the parking garage.  Defendant shouldn't be behind the wheel of a car.  

Plaintiff gets damages $2100 for medical bills, and lost wages

Second (2016)-

Parents Want Their Child Arrested? -Plaintiffs Victoria and Richard Kingsbury suing estranged daughter Melissa Kingsbury for stealing her cat from their house.    Parents threw daughter out for celebrating her birthday with her boyfriend, and his family.    The parents kept the cat, refused to return it, and while parents were out of town, defendant told the housesitting neighbor she needed to get her cat, neighbor let her, and parents wanted daughter arrested for theft.    

Parents are part of a church group, father and mother have their home as a church.   Parents are estranged from all of their children, the second the children are old enough to escape them.   Father grabbed the car back that daughter paid half for, because she didn’t want to live by his ridiculous rules, and he also cancelled the insurance.  

Daughter is living at boyfriend’s mother’s house, paying rent, and going to school.    The other siblings are in court as witnesses for their sister.      Plaintiff so-called mother claims daughter doesn’t know her own cat, and stole the mother’s white cat, not the black cat daughter owned.      Mother also claims she owns the car the daughter was on title to.  

JJ dumps the burglary claim, and makes daughter sign the car title over to father, and defendant gets half the value of the car.

(The parents are estranged from all of their children, I think Melissa is the youngest one.)

(There are some postings on FB from the older sister of Melissa, saying the parents are still estranged, and Melissa and the other kids are doing very well.  Some were dated a year or two after this case first aired, and some are from a year or so ago.)

Edited September 28, 2021 by CrazyInAlabama

[poeticlicensed]

Parents of the cat stealing girl were definitely pieces of work. So afraid their daughter would go out and have SEX that they took away her car and tried to get her arrested. It spoke volumes that other siblings were on their sisters side and the holier than thou parents had no one. 

[Back Atcha]

2 hours ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

Plaintiff says after the bite the defendant grabbed her dog and was saying “What will happen to my dog?”.     Defendant was letting the three dogs wander the beach with the leashes dragging behind them.    Plaintiff says there were several people, including the mother, with the defendant.   Defendant mother denies say anything about the dog biting, and just like her defendant daughter tries to minimize the plaintiff’s injuries.    Plaintiff shows a photo of her leg, and it’s a lot more than what defendant mother calls ‘not even a nick’.    

This DIMWIT defendant's mother is going to be doing a lot of paying/explaining/picking up after her idiot daughter.  She's the poster "child" for The Entitled.  Even after JJ explains everything and the DIMWIT is found liable...she makes her lame excuses after trial and defames the plaintiff.

[parrotfeathers]

11 hours ago, poeticlicensed said:

Parents of the cat stealing girl were definitely pieces of work. So afraid their daughter would go out and have SEX that they took away her car and tried to get her arrested. It spoke volumes that other siblings were on their sisters side and the holier than thou parents had no one. 

That case was truly weird.  This time I have to agree with JJ--what parents do this to their kids?  JJ's kids weren't snow white as she had said (the time they had fun with some boats) but she wouldn't have sued them.

[CrazyInAlabama]

4 p.m. reruns-

First (2013)-

$15,000 Property Loss -Plaintiff/former tenant Heather Harville suing former landlord Terry Dugan for return of her security deposit, $1300.  Defendant is suing plaintiff/former tenant claiming the defendant’s unsanitary living conditions caused a loss on the value of his property.   Plaintiff’s children, ages 14, 16, 10, 11, were living with plaintiff, and her husband, her brother, Russell Lewis,  and his wife, and another child.   The extra tenants, including those never on the lease, were there for almost the entire tenancy.    The Russell Lewis Sr. on the lease is plaintiff’s father, a guarantor and co-signer.   Plaintiff had two dogs, and no pet deposits were paid.    Plaintiff claims brother and wife never paid any rent.   Plaintiff didn’t turn the keys directly to the defendant.   There was no walk through with litigants.   Photos of the awful condition of the house are submitted by the defendant.

Plaintiff claims someone broke into the house, and trashed the place.   Sorry, but burglars take things, they don’t leave extra stuff.   Plaintiff father claims plaintiff was sick and couldn’t clean up the house.  Plaintiff took no photos, and claims the place was clean when she moved out.    Defendant says he brought an appraiser in after the move out, and the appraiser said the house was worth $15,000 less from damages by tenants.  

Plaintiff case dismissed.    Defendant counter claim $5,000 (so plaintiff gets nothing from the award pool for the show).

Stolen Identity or Bitter father -Plaintiffs Shannon and Cecil Higginbotham III are suing defendant/son  Cecil Higgenbotham IV (son of plaintiff father) suing for identity theft, for opening two accounts using father’s social security number for a satellite TV account, and a cell phone account.    Plaintiffs were trying to clean up their credit to avoid bankruptcy, when the identity theft occurred.   Son claims father opened the satellite account a few years ago at son’s house in Tennessee.   Father lives in North Carolina, and claims he never opened that account for his son.   

Then, son moved to North Carolina, and claims the prepaid phones on his account and the satellite TV were going to by paid by his sister.     Son claims he’s not responsible for the bills.

Defendant was put in foster care at 10 years old, and says plaintiff was a lousy father.    Son says CASA guardian taught him everything growing up, and claims father is just retaliating against him.   Satellite bill is in collections.    

$1212 to plaintiff.  $1024 for sat. TV, and cell phone $189.

Second (2013)-

Racism and Trans-Gender Hate? -Plaintiff Willie Johnson suing defendant/neighbor Edward Collins, Jr. claiming defendant punched and dented plaintiff’s truck, filed a false restraining order against plaintiff, and had him arrested.   Plaintiff and litigant each have a garage parking stall, and a parking space in front of the garage.    Plaintiff was released without charges after a night in jail.   Plaintiff says defendant came after him with a knife after a dispute over a parking space.    The litigants accuse the other party of prejudice.  (all of the parties in the case live in the same duplex/apartment complex).

Plaintiff claims defendant tried to break into their house, and defendant says plaintiff man had a knife and tried to cut him.    There is a single driveway, and two parking spots behind the duplex.   Defendant fixes cars in the back driveway, blocking the plaintiff from accessing his parking space, and garage.  

Defendant claims if plaintiff asks him to move a car he’s working on, he does.   On the day in question defendant was working on a car, blocking plaintiff, and when asked to move his car he said plaintiff would have to wait.     Defendant claims plaintiff was having a front yard sale, and says that means defendant can run his car repair business in a residential area.   

Defendant wife won’t stop interrupting, so JJ boots her.   Wife will be recalled later to testify.

Defendant finally went to plaintiff’s door to tell him the parking space was clear, and would be available in 20 minutes.    It took two people to wrestle defendant away from trying to break into plaintiff’s house, and then defendant called police with the allegations about the knife.   After the argument, and defendant’s police report, plaintiff was arrested and spent two days in jail, before charges were dropped.  

Mrs. Johnson is plaintiff’s witness.     Defendant claims plaintiff husband tried to knife him, and both wives were witnesses. 

Plaintiff wife testifies that her husband never had a knife, and she saw defendant punch and damage the truck.  

Defendant claims plaintiff is prejudiced against transgender people.  Reychael Rios is defendant wife, and testifies she saw the attempted stabbing, and she called the police.  (On a tacky note, defendant wife has a terrible wig).

I don’t believe anything the defendants say.    

JJ says defendant did punch the truck, but she doesn’t believe the plaintiff didn’t come out and confront the defendant.   

$450 to plaintiff to fix the dent.    

In hall-terview, defendant wife says she’s transgender, and she wanted to kill plaintiff for trying to hurt her husband.

5 p.m. reruns-

First (2016)-

Co-Parenting BBQ Snafu-Plaintiff/ex-girlfriend Jelanee Thomspon says the defendant/father Carl McCaskill, of her three-year-old child vandalized her car at a BBQ.   Defendant says he didn't do it.    After the BBQ everyone went to his house, and the two started fighting.   Defendant tried to get the tablet the child was using, and plaintiff got mad, and plaintiff called police on him.    Plaintiff claims the defendant was out of control.  Plaintiff claims defendant damaged her car, and she wants money.   JJ tells defendant to buy touch up paint, and fix the scratch on her car.   Plaintiff claims defendant tried to put a lit cigarette in her gas tank to blow her car up.   

 $50 to the plaintiff.  

Prized Tennis Shoes Feud-Plaintiff Katie Demirsar suing ex-boyfriend/defendant Malik Davison for loan to buy Michael Jordan tennis shoes.   As usual, defendant says they're a gift, she also wants gas money, and stolen property.    The defendant wanted the sneakers, said he would pay back the plaintiff, so plaintiff gets $190 for the shoes. 

$190 to plaintiff for shoe loan.

Second (2016)-

The Truck that Got Away-Plaintiff Dolly Windschitl claims defendant Dustin Goff gave her a truck, and defendant claims she said he could put it on her grandfather's property for a while.   Plaintiff is suing defendant for truck title, and for vandalizing her car.   (Both litigants were separated from their current spouses). 

Plaintiff was dumping husband, and moving her stuff to her grandfather’s house.  Plaintiff has two little kids.     Plaintiff witness is no longer her ex-husband’s friend, how interesting, and he’s also the one who towed the truck to the grandfather’s property. 

Plaintiff claims defendant kicked her taillight, but that was after she stole his phone.   Plaintiff had the truck towed somewhere else.

 Defendant hadn't registered the truck in his name yet (he got the truck in his divorce).   Plaintiff did nothing to fix up truck, so her story that she keeps the truck if she fixed it up, is nullified.   Defendant gets the truck back, with the marshal's help.   

Case dismissed.  

Convicted Felon Takes on Lawyer-Plaintiff/attorney Julie Ann O’Neill suing former client/defendant Austin Henderson for skipping out on his legal bills.  Defendant paid the retainer, but no other legal bills.     Defendant says attorney didn't get him off, so he didn't pay her after the retainer.  Defendant was charged with forcible robbery, home invasion, and one other charge.   He was convicted on a 2011 case, and was still on probation for this when charged for the robbery.    Defendant was charged with forcible robbery, and assault (not robbery with a gun).   

Defendant says the additional felony shouldn't have resulted in a sentence.   Even though he was on probation, he was released on bail after arraignment.   Attorney represented defendant at arraignment, and probation violation twice, and at violation hearing, 2013 arrest bargained down to dismiss two counts, and defendant only received probation, after attorney bargained with the DA.   Defendant plead guilty to two counts, and received probation again.   

$4500 to plaintiff. 

 

Why are they suddenly advertising following JJ on social media?

[CrazyInAlabama]

4 p.m. reruns-

First (2013)-

Teen Volleyball Madness -Plaintiff Rebecca Jones, mother, is suing defendant/volleyball coach Elaina McLain for making daughter cry during a game, for return of league fees, and emotional distress.  After plaintiff mother cursed at coach, coach told mother to leave the gym.    Defendant says daughter was disrespectful, rolled her eyes, had a bad attitude.    Plaintiff mother signed the contract, and only defendant has a copy of the signed contract.  Contract outlines player and parent responsibilities.  

After Libby got mono, mother says coach credited them for the time Libby didn’t play or practice, but coach penalized daughter for not practicing.    When daughter was cleared to play volleyball again, daughter returned to practice.    Daughter Libby testifies, that she didn’t know the new drills, so she couldn’t participate in everything.  Libby and mommy dearest wanted coach to teach Libby the drill separately.    Then, the argument between plaintiff mother, and coach happened, when the cursing by plaintiff occurred, and coach ousted plaintiff mother.   Why should the coach do individual coaching?  Plaintiff mother says contract says coaching will be equal for all players.

Contract says no parent/coach discussions will happen in front of players, and there were players there when cursing, and argument happened.   Plaintiff mothers says coach was yelling at her the Libby isn’t the best player on the team, and is actually second from worse, and that the other players on her team don’t like Libby (I don’t either, I’ve run into Libby’s my whole life, and they’re insufferable).   After the swearing by plaintiff mother, coach told her and her daughter to leave, and said she’s off the team. 

Apparently, Libby isn’t great at volleyball, but is world championship caliber at ‘eye rolling’.

Coach says during drills she has to be right there, and can’t step aside for individual coaching.  Assistant Coach Anni Prideaux testifies about the plaintiff mother’s behavior, and the argument.  Witness says plaintiff mother referred to coach as “that bitch”.    Coach says Libby and mother wanted another player that Libby goes to school with (Sophie), to be kept away from Libby.    Libby doesn’t want to be paired up with Sophie.  Mother also claims coach picked on her daughter. 

Plaintiff case dismissed.   

Second (2012)-

Teen Too High to Drive? -Plaintiff Dawn Villavicencio suing defendant father Jesse Dulaney over defendant son Brandon Dulaney (age 17) wrecking plaintiff’s car while defendant son was driving.  Plaintiff is car owner, but her 19-year-old son Dalton Villavicencio,  was supposed to be driving.  So, defendant son was driving plaintiff’s car, to go get a skateboard.   Plaintiff wants $5,000 on a car worth $3,000.

Defendant son claims wheel wouldn’t turn, and he slid into the wall, totaling plaintiff’s car.   Defendant has no license, no insurance, and claims he wasn’t stoned while driving.   Defendant father doesn’t let his son drive his own car.    Plaintiff son claims he didn’t give defendant keys to car, but claims Brandon took his keys from the sidewalk, and took the car.    I agree with JJ’s analysis of the lies of both sons. 

Plaintiff car is worth $3,000.  

Plaintiff receives $1325  with 50% to each son.

Pit Bull Bites Dog Sitter -Plaintiff Reina Solario, suing defendant/dog owners Margaret Mueller (mother) and (daughter) Diana Mueller for multiple dog bites by their aggressive dog.    Defendant daughter claims her dog never bit anyone, then claims plaintiff wasn’t bitten, and her dog never bit anyone.   Defendants call dog a mix, but omit the part that he’s a fear aggressive Pit mix.   Defendant mother is trying to play ventriloquist with daughter.   Defendant daughter claims dog is fearful of new people and tries ‘to back them off’.    Defendants wanted a pet sitter for a vacation. 

The litigants met at the dog park to meet the aggressive defendant daughter’s dog.   Regina suggested the dog park meeting as neutral territory, and defendants were late.  Plaintiff met the dog, and about 45 minutes later, defendant Pit mix attacked plaintiff, and bit her on the arm, and later the leg, without warning from the dog.    Plaintiff says defendants did nothing to help her.    

JJ warns defendant daughter that the entire audience knows about her dog’s propensity to attack, and she’s on notice when another attack happens.   Defendant’s can’t find a pet sitter to watch their two dogs either, including a dog trainer.    JJ warns the defendant against pawning this dog on any pet sitter.   Defendant daughter claims another dog bit the plaintiff.   Plaintiff says dog was muzzled, but it was a nylon muzzle, and she was bitten through the muzzle.

Defendant claims in hall-terview plaintiff is lying.  Plaintiff says dogs resemble their owners, and  dog and owners are crazy.

$2,000 to plaintiff.

5 p.m. reruns-

First (2016)-

Friendly Loan or Cry for Help-Plaintiff Kimberly Sullivan suing defendant /former friend James Spaulding, for unpaid loans, $3600.  Defendant came to plaintiff with a tragic story, and needed money to save home from foreclosure.   Plaintiff had him sign his truck over to her as collateral for the loan.   

Defendant says he did a lot of handyman work for the plaintiff, and he was never going to lose his house.  Defendant says the loan was up-front payment for small handyman work.   Defendant can’t name anyone he’s worked for.

$3600 to plaintiff, and defendant was unprepared for trial, so counter claim dismissed.      

White Noise Leads to Homelessness-Plaintiff Liiza Prok suing former landlord, Gregory Hayes, for return of rent, hotel costs, and stolen property.    Plaintiff rented a room in defendant's house for $830 a month, and didn't stay a full month.  Defendant put an ad in craigslist, rented her the room weekly ($600 security, and $200 was weekly rent).   Plaintiff claims $830 was monthly rent, no security. 

Landlord says her white noise machine disturbed the entire house, and so he illegally evicted her.   After plaintiff was evicted she stayed at a friend's place, and stayed in motels, and became homeless for months after this.  Plaintiff has no idea what was stolen.   (The first time this ran, there was a lot of research about plaintiff, and I think JJ got played).   (If defendant had given the appropriate notice for his state, he would have won, but he didn’t.  He’s actually not out a penny, so he really won anyway).

$2330 to plaintiff, $830 for rent back, and the rest for illegal eviction. 

Second (2016)-

Family Emergency Upset-Plaintiffs Steven and Judith Moccio suing car seller, Sean Hill.   Plaintiff purchased car online ($4500) for a classic 1949 car, defendant ran into family issues, ghosted plaintiff, and then resold the car to someone else, also sold through Ebay, and paid in full to defendant.      Ebay paid back $4500, but not an additional $850 plaintiff paid for car repairs to the defendant.  Defendant paid back $3200 to Ebay.    Defendant's emergency was a family member was stabbed.   

$850 to plaintiff, defendant's counter claim is dismissed, because it's flim-flam.   

Cancer or No Cancer-Plaintiff Janice Mensinger allowed defendant Ryan Johnson (a friend of the family) to rent car using her credit card, for transportation to and from doctor's appointments for a cancer diagnosis.   A year later he's still not sure of his diagnosis.   

Rental was $900, for three weeks.   Car was damaged by tree falling on it, and defendant kept car for an extra week also.   Defendant also had a fund raising, and kept that money also.    Defendant has never been treated for cancer in the year since the car rental, he received $1200 from a GoFundMe, and kept the money.    A year after when defendant needed the car, he is going to the same hospital (Roger Maris in Fargo) but still no diagnosis.  

The plaintiff is certainly enjoying JJ ripping the defendant to shreds, and I am also.   Defendant claims he offered to return money to GoFundMe donors, but plaintiff says several of the people were her relatives, and they were never offered their money back.   

$900 for plaintiff. 

Prison Visit Crash-Plaintiff Britney Hasty suing defendant Toyia Curley for crashing her car.   They were visiting their respective partners, during the partners' unfortunate incarceration.    They shared driving, and when defendant was driving plaintiff’s car, she crashed the car. 

Case dismissed. 

[DoctorK]

2 hours ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

Why should the coach do individual coaching?  Plaintiff mother says contract says coaching will be equal for all players.special treatment

Talk about being clueless, "equal for all players" and "I want my precious daughter to get special instruction" are not consistent. I hated the helicopter mom, and sadly I think that she has raised her daughter so that the apple does not fall far from the tree.

 

2 hours ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

Defendant claims in hall-terview plaintiff is lying.  Plaintiff says dogs resemble their owners, and  dog and owners are crazy.

Agree, I wonder in their dogs are as morbidly obese as their owners. Those two were another example of the apple not falling far from the tree. I despised both of them.

[Taeolas]

On 9/28/2021 at 7:45 PM, CrazyInAlabama said:

Why are they suddenly advertising following JJ on social media?

 

I noticed that too; they finally updated the bumpers; probably because they know they'll never have new episodes any more. 

 

I get the feeling that CBS and the syndication networks don't want to be spreading the knowledge that JJ is over now, and they intend to keep airing episodes for as long as they can one way or another. I'd be curious to know who controls the JJ show social media accounts and if they are giving any hints of "Judy Justice" starting on IMDBTV. I would wager they aren't advertising that. 

[CrazyInAlabama]

4 p.m. reruns-

First (2013)-

Assaulted by Parrot! -Plaintiff teen Anna Thompson suing defendant Breanna Jusola-Macko over attack by defendant’s parrot, and wants money for medical bills, and pain and suffering.   Parrot was about a foot tall, and attacked plaintiff without warning. Attack sound horrible.   Plaintiff was living with defendant witness, Betsy (Breanna’s mother, and parrot owner), and Breanna, for a few months, to get plaintiff away from family drama at home.   The second plaintiff got out of the hospital after the attack, the plaintiff packed and moved out, and in with her grandparents.

Plaintiff claims bird didn’t live in the home when she moved in, but was with a pet sitter for a year after Betsy was sick, and bird didn’t like Betsy.   Then, bird started going after pet sitter, and Betsy was told to pick up the bird.   Betsy claims bird was only bird aggressive, not people aggressive.  

The photos of plaintiff’s injury are horrible.   Defendant blames the attack on plaintiff, claims she wasn’t in the home when the attack happened, and claims plaintiff provoked the attack, and had been teasing the bird.    Plaintiff witness says defendant Breanna, and plaintiff were in the living room, but defendant denies she was there.   Lying witness Betsy claims plaintiff provoked the parrot, and nothing was the parrot’s fault.  Betsy claims Duchess, the vicious parrot is a sweet bird.

Plaintiff receives $1,700

Bike and Car Collision -Plaintiff /bike rider Monica Riche is suing defendant/car driver Jenniffer Mountjoy for hitting plaintiff with her car, while plaintiff was riding her bike.    Defendant claims plaintiff actually ran into her car with the bicycle.     Plaintiff was crossing a crosswalk, when front end of car hit the front wheel of plaintiff’s bicycle.    Plaintiff had to carry her bike home, quote “like carrying a friend home from the battlefield”.   

Defendant claims everything was plaintiff’s fault, but it wasn’t.

$500 to plaintiff.

Second (2013)-

When Cousins Fight -Plaintiff/cousin Daphne Hereford suing defendant/cousin Holly Burwell for   damages when defendant was fighting with her husband, Richard Burwell.    Defendants were renting a duplex from plaintiff. Defendant, husband, young son, and Pit Bull lived in the house.  Plaintiff claims defendants trashed the house before they moved out.   Photos of house are disgusting.   Defendant didn’t pay rent for at least two months, but claims house was a fire hazard, water pressure was bad, appliances were malfunctioning.  There was only one main door when plaintiff moved in, so that’s dismissed.   Defendant wife claims bad water pressure, but shows no proof that she told cousin/plaintiff about the water pressure.  

Defendants finally moved out she claims plaintiff trashed her property after the 30-day period provided in the lease, so that’s dismissed.    There are pictures of house on move out with dog poop throughout the house, soiled baby diapers all over the floors, and lots of trash in the house.  One police call on the house too, for defendants arguing.      

Defendant claims she took her dog with her when she moved out, but defendant claims a neighbor made a false claim about defendants fighting the dog.   Defendant rehomed dog with defendant’s mother, because they can’t have a dog where they live now (or maybe not a Pit Bull?).   

Plaintiff claims she has paperwork from Animal Control, saying dog was left alone for almost two weeks in the house, and he eliminated all over the house.  Defendant claims dog was only in the house while she was at work.

$4,000 to plaintiff.

Unwed Parents Car Dispute -Plaintiff /SSMOO (Sainted Single Mother of One) Shaquana Mines is suing defendant/ex-boyfriend Clifton Halsey over the ownership of a car that she bought for him.    Defendant says car is not driveable, and he wrecked it.   

Plaintiff already had her name on a friend’s title, and friend owed parking tickets, so plaintiff couldn’t title car in her name.    Plaintiff bought the car, but title was in defendant’s name so it could be registered.  Defendant never paid a penny on car, but plaintiff’s friend never paid the tickets, so plaintiff still can’t register the car in her name.

Coming to court with unclean hands doesn’t turn out well.    There is no agreement to repay money for car.

 If plaintiff takes care of the unpaid tickets, she can have the car back, but doesn’t want it.   She just wanted the money.

Plaintiff case dismissed.

5 p.m. reruns-

First (2016)-

Father Scams Inmate-Plaintiff car buyer Keith Cormier suing seller/defendant William Bolch for a Mustang purchase.    Plaintiff bought car from defendant for $3,500.   Plaintiff bought car, paid in full, had car title, and took car.   Then four or five days later plaintiff was incarcerated for 14 or 15 months.   

About a week after the car purchase, plaintiff mother Mrs. Cormier needed spare key to car, contacted defendant to get one.   

Plaintiff never retitled, or registered car in plaintiff's name, a month or so later someone wanted to buy the car from mother on payments (it was still in defendant's name).    Plaintiff mother says the potential buyer (Adam) was supposed to do payments for car, took car, paid her a few hundred dollars, car disappeared, and buyer was also incarcerated.   

Defendant never saw the Mustang again.   Defendant witness is one of his sons, David Bolch.    Plaintiff claims the defendant applied for a duplicate title, and resold the Mustang.   Defendant says he did get a duplicate title, but because plaintiff mother called him, said son had lost the title, and needed a replacement.   Plaintiff mother told defendant son that her son was driving car, and title flew out the window.   

Defendant says car was impounded two times, and that was when plaintiff mother needed title to get car out of impound (my guess is to resell it to the mysterious incarcerated person).    Defendant agreed to meet woman at the DMV, and made several appointments to meet her on different days, but she never appeared. 

Plaintiff found car on craigslist, car is registered to Freddy something, and Freddy said he traded his car and some money for Mustang, and no title.  My guess is Freddy had a title signed over to him, and registered it, so I bet plaintiff mommy had the title all along.  Freddy *** got car out of impound and registered it somehow.  Plaintiff mother is getting the overacting award for the show today.   I believe everything the defendant, and his son said about the case.   

 Defendant is found by JJ to have nothing to do with impound or reselling of car. Case dismissed.  

Brother's Gift Backfires-Plaintiff/brother Robby Dickerson (car owner), is suing his sister/defendant Chellonda Falls for her unpaid traffic tickets.  (On a tacky note, who did that to the defendant sister's hair? Edward Scissorhands maybe?).     

Defendant claims plaintiff doesn't want her driving the car, and her only ticket was thrown out of court.   Plaintiff claims he bought car so father could be driven around by various relatives.   Defendant claims everyone drives that same vehicle, including plaintiff, and various relatives, so who knows who got the tickets.   One ticket was for cell phone use while driving, and driving without insurance.   Plaintiff submits other tickets he claims were sister’s, but defendant says the tickets weren’t hers.    The tickets were red light tickets.    Plaintiff told to take the car back, but Tahoe is out of his name.   However, plaintiff claims tickets still came back to him. 

Defendant claims brother filed a false CPS claim against her, but there is no proof who called CPS.   

$498 to plaintiff for the tickets.  (Followed by a hug in the hall, so I suspect it was all phony to get the ticket paid).

Second (2016)-

Pedestrian Teen Hit by Truck-Plaintiff teen’s father Cornelius Mannings, is suing defendant because his teen daughter Kei’Amara Mannings, was jaywalking across street, and was hit by defendant, Duane Tolliver,  when teen  ran across street in front of his car.   

Defendant Duane Toliver was beaten by an uncle of the defendant teen.  Plaintiff father denies he knew anyone hitting the defendant, but the child's mother/plaintiff’s ex-girlfriend Charmaine Montgomery,  rats out her ex’s brother.  Teen claims the man saw her, nodded at her, and hit her anyway, so she says it was a deliberate attack on her.   

Defendant's insurance wasn't activated (that's why I go to my agent's office to initiate my insurance on a new car, after talking to the online customer service if the regular office is closed), because he did it on his phone.     Plaintiff teen claims man deliberately hit her. 

Police report, and insurance company say insurance wasn’t in force that day.

Defendant says multiple people attacked him, and the principal assailant went into the family house.   Teen and her father both claim to know nothing about the assault happening on the defendant, and claim they don’t know who assaulted defendant.        Teen's mother says Uncle Cornelius did the assault.   Defendant says his wife was the only person who was checking on plaintiff’s daughter.

Teen ran between cars, and accident was unavoidable.   Defendant wasn’t cited by police.

Case dismissed.  

College Payback Gone Wrong-Plaintiff Herbert Brown suing step-grandson / defendant William Franklin III, for student loan payments, attorney fees, and damaged credit, $4600+.   Plaintiff co-signed student loan, defendant paid for almost 2 years, stopped paying on loan, renegotiated to $360, from $500+a month.    Both defendant parents are disabled, and defendant moved home and is helping parents financially, so stopped paying loans.   

Plaintiff is step grandfather, by his second wife, one of defendant's parent is her adult child.    There is a no trespass order against defendant father, by step grandfather.     I see why they agreed to come on the show, because it would be hell to collect a small claims case from the defendant.  

Defendant's loan is only $1542, but step grandpa wants treble damages, and he's not getting that.    Plaintiff gets $1542.

[parrotfeathers]

2 hours ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

Plaintiff mother is getting the overacting award for the show today.   I believe everything the defendant, and his son said about the case.

I didn't believe a thing that woman said.  I was thinking she was trying to also put one over on her son (not telling him she sold the car).  The defendants' demeanor didn't show at all they could even think up a scam this idiotic anyway.

[CrazyInAlabama]

4 p.m. reruns-

First (2013)-

Dog Bites Baby Shower! -Plaintiff Arnissha Delaney suing defendant Rolanda Anthony-Smith for pain and suffering, after a dog bite before plaintiff’s baby shower.   Defendant says plaintiff has loud parties all of the time, and claim plaintiff killed her cat.  Plaintiff says defendant is delusional.   The two litigants live side-by-side, and have had a lot of issues in the 18 months they lived in the houses.    Defendant is upset about plaintiff parking in front of defendant’s house on the street, but plaintiff claims she only parked there once.     Defendant says the parking pests are plaintiff’s teenager, a couple of cousins, and a couple of little kids, and others.   Plaintiff and her three kids live in the house, and she denies the other people live there. 

Plaintiff parked in front of defendant’s house, when defendant’s dog that was being walked broke the leash, or pulled the leash loose from the dog walker, and ran up and bit plaintiff on the leg.     Plaintiff went to the emergency room in the middle of the night, long after the dog bite, and baby shower ended.   Medical records say a 2 cm. ( JJ pronounces it as “sonti-meter) scratch.  So, dog bite happened, plaintiff went to her baby shower, and didn’t go to the hospital until right after midnight.    Plaintiff claims a police officer told her to go to the ER.     Defendant is counter suing for death of her cat, and quarantine costs for her dog (JJ dismisses the quarantine, and cat killing).

Plaintiff will get medical bills, but no pain and suffering. 

$568 to plaintiff.

Public Assistance Lost! -Plaintiff Catherine Mosko (SSMOT-Sainted Single Mother of Two) suing defendant/ex-boyfriend Jonathan Limbeck, over losing her public assistance for housing, because he wouldn’t write a statement that he didn’t live with her.    Defendant needed to give plaintiff a statement of where he lives, and that he no longer lives with defendant, so she can try to get her public housing assistance back.  

Plaintiff moved defendant into her Section 8 housing, with their child, and her child from another relationship.   Because defendant moved in, plaintiff lost Section 8, and she wants defendant to pay half of her rent that she now has to pay.   JJ is trying to get defendant to do a statement to the housing authority, saying he no longer lives with plaintiff.     Defendant was the live-in baby sitter for both kids.

Plaintiff is suing for $3600 in rent.   Plaintiff claims defendant cheated on her with her best friend.

Plaintiff wants defendant to pay her rent, not happening.   Now JJ will get a statement from defendant saying he’s not living with plaintiff.

My question is why Section 8 would give the subsidy back to plaintiff, after she broke the rules?   I bet it’s not the first time she broke the rules either. 

Plaintiff needs a bill or lease with defendant’s name on it to get the rent subsidy back, but that was within 10 days that she was notified that she had to pay the entire rent.

Plaintiff case dismissed, she says it’s too late to get a statement or other proof.

Second (2012)-

Mother/Daughter No Love Lost -Plaintiff /mother Therese Radke suing defendant /daughter Kali Radke,    30 years-old, for vandalism, false restraining order, stolen belongings, and false arrest.  Mother took daughter, and 8-year-old granddaughter into her home in Maryland.   There were a lot of fights, and then daughter made police report claiming grandmother/mother assaulted the granddaughter, and plaintiff was arrested.   Daughter called mother from Texas, and CPS said home was unlivable for granddaughter.  Mother paid for cleaning crew, and daughter was given back to defendant, but apartment complex wanted defendant out.   So, plaintiff offered a home to daughter and granddaughter. 

Defendant didn’t see the name calling by plaintiff to granddaughter, but granddaughter claims grandmother/plaintiff slammed the door on her, hitting her, but defendant didn’t call the police that night.    Defendant said she would make a police report if plaintiff didn’t change, and defendant didn’t try to move or get a job so she could leave either.

Defendant was a full-time student in Texas, but didn’t go to school or work in Maryland (where the mother lived).    Texts to plaintiff from daughter talk about serious trash accumulation, the same issue that led to CPS attention in Texas, and led to the eviction in Texas too. 

Plaintiff was arrested after defendant called police about an assault on the 8-year-old, and spent the TRO week moving out.    However, defendant is still not working or going to school, and is living in a homeless shelter.   But, as JJ says, daughter certainly knows how to game the system.    

Defendant says she sold, or disposed of what didn’t fit in her car for the move to Maryland.   So, defendant needed a week to pack, and put stuff in storage.    The day after the protective order, plaintiff/mother traded in both cars, and bought a much older used car for her own use (both cars were paid for by plaintiff, and in her name). 

When plaintiff was prohibited by the TRO from going in her own home, defendant locked plaintiff’s dog in plaintiff’s room, (dog was adopted for grandchild) with food and water, and left it there for 10 days.    Pictures of part of home where defendant lived was trashed, with holes in the wall.   Home is a rental, and plaintiff is staying after having to pay landlord hundreds of dollars for damages. 

Defendant’s attitude is ‘total smart ass’.     Defendant’s claims for moving expenses, and injury to child are dismissed.

Plaintiff receives $5,000.

5 p.m. reruns-

First (2016)-

Teen Lies to Police-Plaintiff  /mother (car owner) Lisa Johson is suing her son's former friend/defendant, Mario Ramirez, for forcing son to let defendant drive the car, and wrecking it.  The two teens have been at the same school for several years, and were friendly.   Plaintiff son claims defendant forced him to let him drive the car, and he wrecked it.   Plaintiff witness is son who was at the incident, Andre Johnson, claims friend bullied him into giving him the car keys, and wrecked the car.

Defendant says plaintiff was driving during the accident, and wanted defendant to switch places and lie to police. 

 Plaintiff mother claims defendant bullied her son, which is ridiculous since the son was friendly with defendant, and liked to go to defendant's house to visit.   Defendant says plaintiff was driving to the donut shop, car brakes failed, and car crashed.  Defendant says plaintiff wanted him to take responsibility for the accident, and he did.   

Plaintiff mother wants over $2700 to fix the car, but Blue Book is only $1525.  Plaintiff and son went to defendant’s home to ask for money for the accident.    Insurance disclaimed paying, because the driver defendant wasn't licensed, or on the insurance. 

$1525 for plaintiff. (I don’t believe the plaintiff or her son, and wouldn’t have given her a penny).

Rodent Disposal Fee Fight-Plaintiff Edna McCants step-grandmother owns condo, and step granddaughter /defendant Kimberlee McCray moved into the condo.   Plaintiff loaned $5,000 to one step granddaughter (who moved in with her two kids).   Defendant paid back all but $1,000, and she claims she doesn't owe the step grandmother anything.   Grandmother wants rodent disposal fees, unpaid rent, and unpaid loan.

Two step granddaughters moved in and were on the lease.    Grandmother claims she has a signed lease with defendant (other step granddaughter moved out), for her boyfriend, and now, two kids to live there.   Plaintiff witness is the other granddaughter,

Rent is $787 a month, and defendant didn't pay for two months.   Plaintiff's witness step-granddaughter lived in condo for 7 years, and moved out when boyfriend moved in, and another baby was coming, and she said there never was a rat problem.     23-year-old defendant is 23, and has a six-year-old, and an infant.  

Defendant's reason for not paying rent is that the condo had a rat problem, but the one rat was finally caught, and it looks domestic to me.    Plaintiff wants two month’s rent, $1000 loan, and rodent disposal fees.   They have a picture of the dead rat, but I think it’s a domestic /pet store rat.   (Officer Byrd is very amused about carrying rat pictures around).

$2574 to plaintiff, for two months rent, and $1,000 for the loan.

Second (2016)-

Children Fight Deceased Father's Soulmate-Plaintiffs grown son Andrew Diamond, and daughter Susan Pendleton, are suing the late father's long term (six years) partner, Johanna “Joan” Diamond, suing for taxes, attorney's fees, and property that belonged to the father.   

Defendant had life estate in late father's house, but after pressure from awful adult children, she moved out to a place of her own.    I love that defendant’s son is an attorney. 

Defendant says the two brats took items on the days around the funeral.     Plaintiff daughter wanted car that father left.    Since it was in both names, car became defendant's car.   Plaintiff daughter is ticked because she had to pay $12,000 for the car.   When forced out by despicable plaintiffs, defendant bought a condo.   

Plaintiff daughter wanted the patio furniture for ‘sentimental reasons’, but it turns out that she wanted to sell it during the summer season for the most profit. 

 Plaintiff's law suit is dismissed, because their course of harassment forced defendant to move out of a house with a life estate for defendant.     Audience applauds the verdict, not often you see a standing ovation on this show.  (On previous airings, other posters said that they’ve been told by people who know Joan Diamond, that she’s a lovely person.  I hope Ms. Diamond is happy, and no longer bothered by the despicable plaintiffs).

Email Scam and Slander-Plaintiff Richard Budde suing defendant Joan Farrington for giving him a bad cashier's check for a van he sold her.   Plaintiff only met defendant once, but his wife knew her from the bank she works at.    Plaintiff’s wife is the witness.  Defendant gave them a check for more than the price of the van, so the plaintiff's gave defendant change ($900+ in cash).     Defendant is disabled, but makes jewelry for extra money, and wanted the van to go to places to sell her jewelry.

Defendant claims she has no idea where the car is now, and says she gave car to plaintiffs.  Plaintiffs are shocked at defendant’s claim they have the car.  Car is titled by defendant.  Defendant claims police and postal inspectors were contacted about bad check, and I can't believe people fall for that scam still.   

$2775 for plaintiffs. ($50 for attorney fees, and $2725 for the check).

Edited October 1, 2021 by CrazyInAlabama

[One Tough Cookie]

I've been in the hospital for three weeks and have about 40 episodes in my DVR.  Anything special I should look out for?

Also--I was in so much pain and so drugged--did I hallucinate her last show? 

Edited October 3, 2021 by One Tough Cookie

[CrazyInAlabama]

This week all 4 p.m. reruns are 2012 and 2013, all 5 p.m. reruns are 2016.

4 p.m. reruns-

First (2013)-

Tandem Bike Crash! -Plaintiff Keith and Kathy Wiebke (the parents) (injured was their daughter Melissa Wiebke) are suing defendant Timeri Pavia-Faulds (mother of daughter in bike crash, and tandem bike owner), for a bike crash that broke plaintiff Melissa’s knee.   Bailey Pavia, is daughter of defendant, and was riding and steering the bike.   Plaintiff daughter, Melissa claims she went to defendant’s garage with mother and daughter, and defendant mother said “You should ride it”.   Not believing the plaintiff daughter’s statement.    Defendants just obtained the bike, and had it put together a day or so before the crash.

Plaintiff daughter says she wanted to ride the defendant’s tandem bike, and defendant mother let them.  The two daughters got on the bike, and crashed, breaking plaintiff daughter’s knee. 

Defendant daughter Bailey testifies that they wanted to try the bike, and mother agreed to let the girls ride it.  

Plaintiff wants daughter’s co-pays for medical care paid by defendant mother.  Plaintiff mother claims daughter wasn’t supposed to go to defendant’s house, which is obviously a lie.   

Plaintiff case dismissed.  Plaintiff father is whining in the hall-terview. 

Ex-Lovers’ Feud -Plaintiff /ex-boyfriend James Clark Jr suing defendant ex-girlfriend Amy Waring for return of belongings she took when she left their home, rent, bills, and cleaning costs.    The litigants lived together for about six months, with defendant’s two children.    They moved into the apartment at the same time, both were on the lease, and defendant had been unemployed for a year before the move in, and didn’t get a job until two months after she moved in.    

Plaintiff tries to claim defendant would pay her half of rent and utilities to him, and catch up after she got a job, but JJ says plaintiff was trading rent for sex with defendant.    After defendant got a job in December, she didn’t pay rent and she moved out in April.   As JJ says, they weren’t roommates, but romantic partners.

JJ will not pay back rent to plaintiff from October to April, and asks plaintiff if he wants to take the rest to another judge.

Plaintiff case dismissed without prejudice to go to another court.

Second (2012)-

Drug Cookie Crash -Plaintiffs Misty Carpenter suing defendant for hitting her truck, son Robert “Robby” Duttine (driver of vehicle owned by Taylor) for truck damages.   Plaintiff Misty claims defendant was told to leave the BBQ (BBQ was at plaintiff’s family home), because Taylor (girlfriend of Robby) and Robby Duttine, brought drug filled cookies, so plaintiff’s mother told defendant, and passenger to leave.  

Cam McClouth is plaintiff witness, and sister, who told defendant and passenger to leave.   As defendant was leaving someone told plaintiff Misty that defendant Robby hit her truck, and kept going.  

Defendant son, and girlfriend claim after the accident they were rushed by a drunken mob.   Defendant father is kicked out for butting in to the case.  Matthew Duttine, father got involved after the crash, and then can’t control himself in court.   Plaintiff claims defendant parents said they would pay her for truck damage.    Witness Taylor claims plaintiff Cam punched Robby.    Witness Taylor is asked to take a hair follicle test to detect drug use, and a few seconds later can’t remember what JJ asked her.   

Plaintiff didn’t report accident to insurance, or get a police report.    Witness Taylor won’t shut up in court, and can’t remember anything in court.   

Plaintiff gets car damages (at least I think so, I missed the last minute of the case).     Defendant and mother are yelling threats, and Robby is threatening physical harm to plaintiff and sister, Cam.    (Since this case was 9 years ago, I wonder what happened to everyone?)  

No Car, No Money -Plaintiff/ex-boyfriend Jaron Johnson suing defendant/ex-girlfriend Michaela Pomeroy (mother of his young children) for the return of a Cadillac, and apartment costs.    Apartment costs are tossed, because defendant wasn’t on the lease, and only a partial lease is submitted).    Registration is in defendant’s name, and plaintiff’s name isn’t on the title, because he was fighting a DUI, and tickets.   

Plaintiff also didn’t have a driver’s license.    Plaintiff can’t drive because of no license, and the tickets prevent him from titling the car, and registering the car.

Plaintiff case dismissed.  Plaintiff did not come to court with clean hands.

5 p.m. reruns-

First (2016)-

Stealing From the Disabled?!-Plaintiff /former tenant Kadisha Fong suing former landlord/defendant (owner of duplex, who lives in one side, and rents the other side out) Juanita Klingensmith for stealing from her bank account, and unlawful eviction.  Plaintiff claims her landlady had the account number, and pin number, and used it to steal from her.  However, rent was $750, but the withdrawal was for $713 instead.    Plaintiff and her daughter lived in the duplex.  

Plaintiff had a history of late payments, one month non-payment until well after the due date, so she was served with an eviction notice from landlady. In Oct 6 and 13, plaintiff was given eviction notices, for not paying rent in October.   On October 13, plaintiff paid the rent.    Plaintiff never paid November’s rent.

JJ says no proof of theft, no reason to get security back, since no payment for one month's rent was ever made.   Utilities weren't in her name, but that wasn't put in counter claim, so defendant isn't getting more than the withheld security deposit that covers the rent.    Damages are cleaning, holes in wall, etc.  Too bad defendant didn’t file the counter claim for damages.  Plaintiff doesn’t get paid for the couch she abandoned in the duplex.

Both cases dismissed, and defendant keeps security deposit.  

Stalking and Harassment-Plaintiff/ex-boyfriend Aaron Tew suing defendant/ex-girlfriend Christina Swanson  for unpaid loans, and the return of belongings (a laptop, and a BBQ grill).   Defendant claims stalking and harassment, but no police report.   What a shock, they met online, and it was a short relationship.    

Plaintiff loaned her money for her to buy items to resell at the flea market.     Defendant says he bought items for plaintiff to resale at flea markets, and she never repaid him. 

As JJ points out, if defendant was so afraid of plaintiff's stalking, then why didn't she return his items?   No police report of stalking was made by defendant.   Defendant claims she gave plaintiff a chance to pick up his two items, but plaintiff never showed up.  Plaintiff never received the text.

Plaintiff loans, and credit charges are dismissed.   Counterclaim dismissed.    Plaintiff has order to retrieve his grill and laptop in the next five days with a police escort. 

Second (2016)-

Let's Do the Bad Math!   - Plaintiff Sean Taylor suing former friend/defendant Robert Martin for return of car down payment, emotional distress, and slander.     Defendant sold his nephew Cator Martin,  the same car, for $1098.   Then sold car to plaintiff for $745, because nephew went to jail, and didn't finish paying for it, but plaintiff had to repossess it himself.    Defendant still has the title, but plaintiff has the car.   Plaintiff paid $300 cash and $445 in labor to pay for car.

Defendant wants $5,000 for return of the car, lost wages, and car damages-this man already collected more than double the blue book of the car.     Officer Byrd laughs when he hears the counter claim by defendant.  KBB is $800 for the car.   Nephew tried to get car back from plaintiff.

JJ has to use her new calculator, because someone stole the previous calculator off of her desk.

Plaintiff gets car title signed over to him, as title is in nephew’s name, with uncle as lien holder,  and defendant gets $730 for the car.     Nephew told to sue uncle/defendant for his $1098, but won’t.

Contractor Scam?!-Plaintiff Juan Ciaurri suing contractor/defendant Sean Starnes for return of payments for home remodeling.    Defendant is a licensed contractor in Orlando, Florida, and was hired to redo a shed. 

The contractor was supposed to redo the shed into living quarters from the studs out, and did less than half of the work contracted for.    Plaintiff deposit was $3400.    Defendant has no receipts for supplies he bought for the job. 

Defendant loses, and should have.  Plaintiff receives $3400.

[7EasyPayments]

Hello All!

I've been not paying attention so I have 2 obvious(?) questions.

Where is JJ in Oct. 2021?  Blog Vlog Streaming? TIA

Sometimes I log onto DailyMail or another tabloid site, and they have a teaser with JJ kissing a woman on the lips, insinuating this is JJ's authentic spouse. Story? TIA

 

[CrazyInAlabama]

4 p.m. reruns-

First (2013)-

Fake Doctor? -Plaintiff Kristina English suing defendant/Chiropractor Dr. Barry Schleider, for selling her a series of treatments for $5,000, plaintiff claims it was for lifetime chiropractic services.   Plaintiff claims defendant is a fraud, and she should get her money back.   Plaintiff was having back pain, and after a lot of treatment she still has back pain, and wants every penny back.   Plaintiff will only get her money back if defendant refused to treat her.   Plaintiff had a mountain bike accident about 18 months before the treatments started.  Plaintiff went to four or five Chiropractors or doctors before going to defendant.

Defendant was the only person who offered a diagnosis, and a treatment plan. 

The lifetime treatment plan, with a couple of visits a week, would cost $5,000, until the back pain was gone.    Plaintiff paid the $5,000, and went two or so times a week, after six weeks she was taken off of decompression, and she then wanted her money back.   Plaintiff claims other medical professionals said she didn’t have a ‘crunched’ vertebrae, but they aren’t here to testify.  

Plaintiff witness, another Chiropractor, only saw a photocopy of the X-rays, and isn’t certified as an expert witness.    Dr. Carol Soloway testifies, plaintiff witness was a chiropractic reviewer for an insurance company, and not an independent witness.   The witness is testifying based on a bad photocopy of x-rays, about decompression plans, and treatments.   

However, this is a contract case, not a medical case.   Defendant shows plaintiff had 42 office visits, whci comes out to $119 per visit.   There is nothing written guaranteeing the plaintiff will be healed, and pain free.

Plaintiff case dismissed.  Defendant says that if plaintiff returns to his office that he will treat her

Second (2012)-

Love Bite -Plaintiff Bridgette Nichols is suing defendant /ex-lover Alton Brown for car payments, rent and mental anguish.  Car was in both names, and plaintiff wants the money she put into the car, or the car back.   Plaintiff went to a club with defendant, she drove to the club, and she got very drunk, and then plaintiff drove home drunk..   As, JJ says defendant is legally liable if plaintiff drives drunk in a car they co-own.  

Car was purchased by the plaintiff, in both litigants names, and defendant will give car back after his name is taken off the title.   Plaintiff paid the down payments, and was paying payments too, but she claims car is paid off.  Car was $34,000, and has depreciated.    Down payment by plaintiff was $1800, plus payments that were made.     

Plaintiff witnesses keep chiming in, and I hope are getting the boot soon.   Only one plaintiff witness gets the boot, and I’m devasted.  

Plaintiff claims she loaned defendant money for his truck, three payments worth.   Defendant never paid plaintiff back for any payments, so she had no expectation of repayment.   

Plaintiff was blackout drunk, and she bit defendant, and remembers nothing.   Defendant was is suing for the assault, and his medical bills.   Plaintiff claims defendant wanted sex, and won’t shut up, so plaintiff is booted, and her other witness follows her too.    Unfortunately, it wasn’t an actual boot, they just got ousted from the courtroom.  

Defendant says plaintiff was drunk, bit him on the face (he’s lucky he didn’t get a horrible infection, human bites are very dangerous).

Plaintiff case shredded, defendant has no medical bills, so his case dismissed.

I Want My Cash! -Plaintiff/car owner Jacob “Ryan” Avery suing defendant /alleged drunk driver, and car buyer, Richie Laughlin for driving plaintiff’s car while drunk, driving into the river, and car was totaled, and defendant stopped paying for car.   

Defendant admits to a couple of drinks, so he gave the keys to his friend to drive, and crossing a low water bridge they were washed downstream, trashing the car.  

Defendant was in jail for two days after the car dunking, but still claims he went to impound the day after the accident and car started right up.   This is not possible, unless jail lets you take a field trip to the impound yard.

Plaintiff says it cost $3,000 to fix the car after it’s six hours in the river.

Plaintiff receives $1,500.  

5 p.m. reruns-

First (2016)-

Ex-Wife Gets the Pit Bull-Plaintiff truck driver Shedrick Bennett is suing defendant/ex-wife, Megan Bennett, and her mother Mary Jo Ward, for the return of his dog, a Cane Corso/Pit Bull mix.  The plaintiff had the dog since it was three months old, his son Jason Bennett, bought the puppy, and gave his father the dog, and the dog usually traveled with him. (Bizarre note, plaintiff claims he never lived with the ex-wife for the two years they were married).   (I'm not liking the plaintiff, his previous dog died of heartworm, a disease that's easily prevented, and a horrible way to die). 

 Defendant daughter keeps laughing about her drug use, and claims that she never lived with plaintiff during the two years they were married.

Plaintiff claims his current trucking company allows dogs in the truck cabs, and JJ asks for the name of the person at the company that can confirm the policy, and when plaintiff can’t give her a name, she asks for the name of the owner / president of the company, and she’ll call them.   Plaintiff declines to give the name.  

(My guess is JJ didn't like that the previous dog died of heartworm, and the plaintiff said he hadn't bred the dog 'yet'.) (The ex-wife is so blitzed in court, but her mother seems much more stable.  Defendant wife must have done her eyebrows while she was under the influence, because they’re bizarre.). 

Plaintiff gets $500, and defendants keep the dog (I think the dog is really with the mother, not her daughter). 

Mercedes Custody Battle-Plaintiff Dianna Wright suing former friend/defendant Kari Spitzack for value of a car, and a false restraining order.    Plaintiff claims defendant gave her the car, and then repossessed it, after defendant didn't maintain insurance on it.   Mercedes ML 320 was the car. but I don't know the year. 

Plaintiff claims car was registered in her name, but she didn't have insurance on vehicle.  How did plaintiff try to register car with no proof of insurance?    Defendant says car is not registered to plaintiff.   

 Defendant has paperwork from the police saying car is hers, claims the plaintiff abandoned the car, and police called her to pick the car up.      Defendant claims plaintiff swiped the car back, had it for a month, and car is now gone.  (No, the stories don't make sense).  Mercedes was a salvaged title.   Defendant says plaintiff brought car back the same day defendant gave it to her, because plaintiff couldn’t get insurance on it.   A condition of gifting the car was plaintiff getting insurance on the car.  Plaintiff has hideously poor credit, and couldn’t get insurance.    I suspect Geico wouldn’t have insured the plaintiff anyway, just a high risk company.     What the hell has plaintiff done to her hair?    JJ asks Officer Byrd if plaintiff’s $39.65, (so she’s apparently paying month by month)  insurance premium is possible, and Officer Byrd looks like he’s in pain.   

 Case dismissed for both sides.    (Audience applauds the verdict.)

Second (2016)-

Dirty Drug Test Bail Out-Plaintiff Justin LaBreche suing ex-wife/defendant Molly LaBreche, and her mother, Juanita Willmes, for unpaid bail, and credit damage.  Defendant failed drug test, again.      They were actually living together for a while, because otherwise she would be homeless.   Her children were taken by the state in 2005 after a DUI, and plaintiff has custody since 2005.  This time she was arrested in 2008 for petty theft, 2005 DUI, and this time in 2013 for a dirty drug test.    She tested dirty for meth, and prescription drugs.    Defendant paid child support from her disability.   

Remaining bond amount is $4786, or she would have to go to jail for six months.   She claims to be sober for six months, but she's been arrested many times in El Dorado county, so she’s not sober consistently.    Defendant's mother claims she didn't know daughter was busted again.     Too bad for plaintiff, the phone number for bondsman is wrong, no contact to verify. 

Justin LaBreche says he also has to pay $15 a day for his son who is in jail.   

Sadly, it seems that Molly Labreche didn't change her ways. Such a sad story, I feel sorry for her kids.    (When JJ can't reach the bail bond company, the hideous look from defendant when she realizes she'll never have to pay her own bond off is nasty.   I also think defendant's mother is lying about not knowing her daughter was arrested, and needed bail).  

Case dismissed.  

Teen TV Custody-Plaintiff Grant Glavin suing defendant Monna Anderson for half of the money spent on their TV.  The litigants lived together, bought a TV two years ago, and plaintiff wants $300 for half of their joint TV.   

Defendant has a "Once Upon a Time" Disney tattoo on her upper chest, and between that and her green hair, not a pretty picture.  Also, the defendant's nose piercing looks like a giant booger.  

Defendant offered $300, and plaintiff accepted it, so he gets the money.   

$450, for plaintiff, $150 for the phone defendant broke, and $300 for the TV. 

[CrazyInAlabama]

4 p.m. reruns-

First (2013)-

Revengeful Roommates -Plaintiffs Audrey Gleason and boyfriend/other roommate,  Anthony Dellerba, are suing defendant /former roommate Renee Ruff   for defendant’s portion of the rent for a year, $4375.    They rented a house together, with $675 rent for defendant, plus $50 a month cat rent. Plaintiff woman had a high-risk pregnancy.    There were a bunch   Plaintiff woman was going through a divorce, and having her second child, with her autistic son, and friend/plaintiff, with defendant as the roommate in the third bedroom for $675 a month.    After a diagnosis with a high-risk pregnancy, plaintiff woman told defendant that cats had to be confined to her bedroom, and litter box cleaned four times a day.  So, defendant said she couldn’t live under those conditions, and moved out with her cat, the same day. 

Plaintiff woman wants the rest of the months rent from defendant.    Plaintiff woman and her friend couldn’t leave without breaking the lease, taking the hit to their credit, or paying the lease.  Defendant’s wig is hideous, obviously left from the clearance sale at the Judge Mathis and Maury show disguise shop.

Also, defendant, and plaintiff man have medical marijuana cards, and plaintiff woman couldn’t be around the pot smoke.   Defendant witness Joshua,

Plaintiffs made no effort to get another roommate.    Plaintiffs have since moved to another apartment with their children (so is older child plaintiff boyfriend’s too?). 

Defendant paid the entire security deposit all by herself, $1545.   Defendant moved everything out the next day, and moved back to her parents, except a few pieces that plaintiffs kept that belonged to defendant.    Plaintiffs borrowed furniture (couch, dining room set), from defendants and they left it behind when they moved out.  

Plaintiff man says that they didn’t use the couch or dining room table, but moved them to the side and didn’t use them.  

$2,000 to defendant, nothing to plaintiffs.  (in hall-terview plaintiff woman says about her former best friend/defendant  “Don’t trust someone who dresses like a transvestite”,  despicable thing to say about anyone.)

Divorce Disaster -Plaintiff Diane Watson is suing defendant/ex-husband Bryan Watson for half of the tax refund defendant received because he claimed their two children.    Ex-wife/plaintiff has carpal tunnel and nerve damage, so was on disability for one year, and then applied for unemployment, and SS disability, but it was denied.    Plaintiff worked at Bass Pro Shops for almost four years, then went on disability for one year, and nothing since.  So, plaintiff woman’s only income is alimony.   

There is no child support in the divorce decree, and defendant supports both children.   There is nothing written about the tax refund issue.    JJ says the SS disability turn down means plaintiff could work.  

Plaintiff’s ridiculous case dismissed.

Second (2012)-

Stolen Baby Belongings? -Plaintiff SSMOO (Sainted Single Mother of One) Nicole Gower suing defendant/ex-boyfriend and father of her child, Billy Tierney for baby clothing she left when she moved out (they lived in Texas, plaintiff moved back to Missouri with her parents).  Plaintiff is 23, and defendant is 44.

Plaintiff claims they were living with a newborn, a drug user, and alcoholic, and someone who was ‘about to be registered as a sex offender’, and living in a foreclosed house.   Their roommate died a few months after plaintiff moved out.   Defendant has five children, with youngest is 17.   Defendant has four biological children, including baby with plaintiff.   Plaintiff claims she didn’t have the right skills, to get a job and apartment in Dallas.  

Defendant wasn’t on bank account, only plaintiff, because of back child support or other financial issues (defendant claims he had a couple of overdrawn accounts, not unpaid child support).   Plaintiff wants money for clothes that she already replaced, and a medical bill.  JJ tells plaintiff she’s not getting paid for clothing for baby she replaced, and to take medical bill claim to family court.

JJ also says when the child support is tried in court, that the lack of visitation will enter into the court’s ruling.   JJ tells plaintiff to take defendant to family court, but slimy defendant will avoid paying.  JJ tells plaintiff to stop making bad decisions, and make something of her life.   Plaintiff claims she’s going back to school, and work.

JJ will not give money to plaintiff, or defendant.  

Crash at the Club -Plaintiff Stephanie Grusheski is suing defendant Sasha Murray for damages to plaintiff’s car from a car accident.  I really wish we had the video of the accident.  

Plaintiff / car owner says she drove to the club with defendant, and others, and defendant drove plaintiff’s car home, and that’s when the accident happened.    They’re lucky no one was killed in the accident.   

Defendant says plaintiff was driving when the accident happened.   Defendant says she took a taxi home from the club, witnessed by her mother, Michelle Lopez.   JJ points out to witness mother that her daughter would have to take a taxi home from the club or the accident site.  

JJ says she doesn’t believe the defendant’s story, or plaintiff’s.  

$500 for half of the deductible to plaintiff.  

5 p.m. reruns-

First (2016)-

Pot Bellied Pig Bite-Plaintiff Deborah Capra claims her (two blocks and two acres away) neighbor/defendant Lisa Fernald, has a huge pot-bellied pig (200 lbs.) that has escaped the defendant’s stockade fence/chain link defendant's fence (This was in Wareham, MA).   Pig came on the plaintiff's property, and bit her Great Dane.  Plaintiff has an invisible fence, and a stone fence, except for one opening, and says the pig has come on her property before too.    There is a video of the pig in the plaintiff's yard, showing the pig biting the Great Dane.      Dane was bitten on the leg, and owner wants vet bills.     

Defendant's excuse is a tree fell on her fence in early January, and at the time of the bite (end of February) fence still wasn't fixed.   Defendant was notified by the police to get her pig off plaintiff's property.    Defendant wants legal fees, she hired a lawyer to get documentation (defendant wanted plaintiff's dog's medical records), and animal control gave first bill to defendant. 

The defendant had fence down over a month before the escape and bite.  Defendant's witness is an animal control officer, testifying for defendant, and claiming the bite we saw on video didn't happen.    Defendant's witness needs her eyes examined, because you can see the pig hurting the dog.     Defendant's ridiculous case dismissed.    (I’m surprised some enterprising neighbor hasn’t had a pig roast with the errant pig).   Plaintiff had to call police and a neighbor to get the pig off of her property after the bite.  

When the pig trespassed, plaintiff brought in foster dogs first, and was taking a picture of the pig, instead hit video, when the pig bit the dog on the leg.   First vet bill was presented to defendant by animal control.   Defendant wanted vet bills. and treatment explanation from vet, and that’s why defendant wanted to be paid for legal fees.  Defendant case dismissed, even after animal control officer in court claims she doesn’t see the bite on the video.

This was the second time plaintiff saw the pig on her property, and her husband thought she was wrong about seeing a pig on their property, so she was trying to get a photo, when she accidentally hit video.   Whatever the plaintiff’s backstory is, the defendant is a negligent animal owner, and should have paid the vet bills.    Not everybody realizes pigs can be dangerous.  

 Total vet bills $626, so $700 to plaintiff.  

Two Bedrooms Too Small-Plaintiff Tyrene Mills rented room in apartment from defendant, Jackie Parker, and is suing for returned rent, illegal eviction, and property, $3500.   Plaintiff was up to date on rent, when defendant changed the locks on him.  Defendant claims plaintiff was aggressive the second he moved in, and he evicted plaintiff for safety reasons.   It was a non-smoking apartment, and defendant claims plaintiff was smoking, and set the apartment on fire, but the smoking issue wasn't in the lease (JJ asks what plaintiff was smoking).   Plaintiff claims an assault also.   

Defendant claims plaintiff broke in, and stole two TVs, and other items, without proof, but neighbor who witnessed this isn't in court.  Defendant has photos showing burning items, and says plaintiff set something in his apartment on fire.    There is no proof that the plaintiff is the thief.   Defendant needs a better written lease with what’s not allowed included, such as smoking.  Defendant claims he changed the lock the first time, and plaintiff changed the locks back, and he had to call a locksmith twice.   Burglary report tossed, because of no witnesses.  There is no proof burglar was the plaintiff.

$700 rent, and security back to plaintiff. 

Second (2016)-

Artwork vs. the Car Wash!-  Plaintiff  Spencer (husband/artist) and Alex (wife/family law attorney) Van Der Zee and wife claim the car wash workers ruined his $3,600 painting (plaintiff husband does 'interesting' art work, and claims painting is worth $3,600) that was left in the vehicle's trunk, at defendant Simon Berhane’s car wash.   This happened in Cincinnati, Ohio.  The painting was unprotected, loose in the trunk, and there is no proof that the car wash people did anything to the painting.     I suspect the wife /plaintiff damaged it, and they needed a fall guy to pay for it.    

The car wash defendant claims the woman slammed the trunk, and hurt the painting herself.   There's a bunch of garbage about missing phone chargers, and a credit card too.   According to the car wash manager the detailers found the chargers, and put those items in a bag, and put it in the trunk.    

 Defendant says that when the woman slammed the trunk when retrieving the chargers, she hurt the painting, and not the detailers at the car wash.

Nothing for the plaintiffs, and I wish they would have had to pay the defendant's company for the harassment, and defamation from their false claim.

Edited October 7, 2021 by CrazyInAlabama

[Aurora8]

On 10/5/2021 at 10:37 AM, 7EasyPayments said:

Hello All!

I've been not paying attention so I have 2 obvious(?) questions.

Where is JJ in Oct. 2021?  Blog Vlog Streaming? TIA

Sometimes I log onto DailyMail or another tabloid site, and they have a teaser with JJ kissing a woman on the lips, insinuating this is JJ's authentic spouse. Story? TIA

 

She has a new series on imdb.com called Judy Justice and produced by Amazon. I have read two seasons have been secured at 120 episodes each. It will be streamed at the usual one episode per weekday interval we are used to. Premieres on November 1st. Trailer available at https://m.imdb.com/title/tt13368190/

Edited October 7, 2021 by Aurora8

[CrazyInAlabama]

4 p.m. reruns-

First (2013)-

Clean and Sober Suit -Plaintiff/ex-boyfriend James Goad suing defendant/ex-girlfriend Jennifer Powell for eviction, and stolen belongings.  Defendant is suing for the same things, eviction, and stolen belongings.  Litigants have a child, and defendant has two more children.  SSMOT (Sainted Single Mother of Three) says they were both druggies, and her other two children are with her father in Texas

Plaintiff has a full time job, but defendant hasn’t worked full time since 2001.   Defendant says they were both living on the streets, using drugs.    Defendant claims she’s been clean and sober since 2009.

Litigants are currently fighting over custody of the baby.  Parents are no longer a couple.   Defendant can’t control herself, and keeps trying to interrupt JJ.  

Plaintiff claims where they used to live, defendant changed the locks, and illegally kept his property. Defendant claims all property is the daughter’s, not plaintiff.   Property is mostly stuffed animals, a VCR, TV, child’s books and toys.  

JJ says defendant had no right to evict plaintiff.   (This case happened in 2013, I wonder how the baby is now?).     I really dislike defendant and her smirks about getting off the hook for returning anything, and I doubt her statements of being sober for five years.

When plaintiff says he’s never tested dirty on his drug tests, and defendant says he’s lying.    Defendant says he tested positive for marijuana, but a false positive, and defendant says plaintiff tested positive for coke. 

JJ tells litigants that they’re not good for each other, and should stay apart.

Plaintiff doesn’t have receipts for anything.  JJ dismisses plaintiff and defendant case for lack of merit, except JJ returns VCR to plaintiff. 

Criminal or Justified -Plaintiff/ex-girlfriend Ashley Whittaker suing defendant/ex-boyfriend William Yager for a repayment of a loan ($2500) so defendant could get divorced, and for damages to plaintiff’s car.  Defendant paid $1,000 back to plaintiff, and still owes $1500.    JJ dismisses the car damages, because the litigants used each other’s car constantly, and while they were living together.

Defendant says he paid for plaintiff’s iPhone 4, instead of paying the rest of his loan back to plaintiff.   Defendant says he’s paying for the iPhone that plaintiff has, and an additional line for her phone.

$1500 to plaintiff for the loan.

Second (2012)-

Child Custody & Malicious Intent? -Plaintiff Rafael Farias suing defendant/child’s mother Blanca Tamayo (SSMOT-Sainted Single Mother of Three) of maliciously filing for a restraining order to get custody of their newborn son, and court fees for defendant’s DMV tickets and charges.   Defendant took the baby and left, claiming it’s her place to decide on visitation.  The protective order application was withdrawn by defendant, so JJ will hear this.  Driving without a license, and driving suspended, and a couple of days in jail, and fines were paid by plaintiff.

Defendant also has a 16- and 20-year-olds, and the baby.    Plaintiff says defendant moved in with plaintiff when she was four months pregnant, and stayed until the baby was small, and then took the baby and left.   $2132 were the court fines paid by plaintiff for defendant.  Defendant keeps claiming plaintiff is abusive, and said mean things about defendant to baby.   Plaintiff served defendant with the custody suit papers while they were still living together.   Then, she moved out, and filed for the protective order, taking the 4-month-old baby with her.      The defendant claims she found paperwork that said plaintiff was going to accuse her of domestic violence, so she filed for the protective order.

Defendant counter sues for return of property.    Defendant claims plaintiff was threatening to not let her see the baby, just as defendant has done to him.   Custody hearing was five days after the time of the protective order application by defendant.   Defendant also had her 16-year-old, and her son-in-law take two loads of her stuff out of the house, when she moved out taking the baby.  The day after plaintiff filed for custody, defendant called CPS about plaintiff.

Plaintiff receives $5,000.  Defendant’s counter claim dismissed.   

5 p.m. reruns-

First (2016)-

Arkansas Handyman Hustle-Plaintiffs Mary and Edward Boyer suing their ex-handyman/defendant Jameson “Clay” Johnston, for incomplete and substandard work on their home.   Defendant was hired to work on plaintiff's house in Arkansas, and is counter claiming for unpaid work.   After moving to Pennsylvania, and then moving back, house has been on the market, still is, and never sold (bet it's overpriced).   Plaintiff's witness is their real estate agent, who seems desperate to keep the listing.     

House was for sale by owner first, didn’t sell, and then listed with plaintiff’s witness and realtor.

 Defendant was paid $2300, including $500 for materials.   Plaintiff wife is certainly unhappy about the way the case is going.   

I agree with JJ, the defendant put in plenty of work, definitely enough for $2300 worth of payment.    The plaintiff's realtor was in and out of the house a lot, and the owners never told handyman to quit. 

I hate the parade of litigants that want to get all of their money back, but still had work finished.  

Defendant is asking for unpaid wages for work done, but not paid, and that’s dismissed.

Plaintiff case dismissed. 

Mobile Homelessness-Plaintiff Edward Montewine suing former friend/defendant Patricia Flores for stealing his tools, after she let him stay in her house, use her shed for storage, and hired him for some handyman work.   If defendant wouldn't have let him live in her living room, man would have been homeless.   

Defendant says the plaintiff's daughter brought a dolly, and picked the tools up, and took them to her father.    Daughter claims she didn't pick up the expensive tools.   Plaintiff claims defendant wanted to sleep with him, and stealing the tools was retaliation for saying no to her.   

Case dismissed. 

Second (2016)-

Tinsel Town Abandonment-Plaintiff Geoffrey Wiegman ($655 requested) is suing ex-landlord Kathleen Pihl over a bag of Christmas decorations that he left at her house after she (he rented in the winter, generally from December to the end of April, in California, and lives on the Cape the rest of the year) re-rented to others.   Defendant says relative of plaintiff picked up the leftover bags from her attic.   Plaintiff throws in a nasty remark about new renters (apparently Middle Eastern renters).    This became such a PITA that defendant is selling the house.  

Yes, plaintiff is suing over used cheapie Christmas ornaments, and small kitchen items.       He's suing for Christmas decorations, a hammer, a water spritzer bottle, toaster oven, a wooden coaster set, a handheld can opener, some Easter decorations, and some coffee mugs.   

When plaintiff demanded his stuff back, summer tenants graciously let defendant look for them.  After summer tenants moved out, defendant looked for more of plaintiff’s stuff in the rental house.

Plaintiff's daughter signed for the Christmas decorations already.   After the daughter picked up the stored items, defendant found another bag of cheap ornaments, and plaintiff's daughter never picked them up.   Defendant gave the two leftover bags to the neighbor who was the former pet sitter to plaintiffs.  Pet sitter doesn't know where the bags went. 

Case dismissed.  After this dust up, defendant sold the house.  (I can imagine the defendant selling the house after having the plaintiff sues her over $50 worth of tinsel and other cheap stuff.    Who does the plaintiff think he is?   How dare the plaintiff treat a seasonal rental as his own home.   Storing stuff in the attic in a house he's only a seasonal renter at?  I bet every Spring after plaintiff moved out, the neighbors had a party celebrating his absence.)

Nothing for plaintiff. 

Courtroom Kickout- Plaintiff Kim Knowler suing defendant Thomas Dougherty for credit card dispute over motorcycle rental.   The rental in question was for $390, for three days.   Defendant made the reservation, rented the bikes, and called to cancel within 34 hours of the original rental reservation.  Plaintiff says cancellation was three days after the reservation was made, and her policy is no refunds.    Reservation was in September, for Thanksgiving.  Defendant had rented the motorcycle twice before this for his son.   

Plaintiff refused to refund the money, only offering vouchers for another rental, and defendant disputed the charges, and he had the money refunded by the credit card company.   Now plaintiff is suing him for the rental costs.     Plaintiff is suing for charges from the credit card company, and other stuff she's not getting. 

Plaintiff won't shut up, keeps talking over JJ, and gets the boot, and case dismissed.  

Edited October 7, 2021 by CrazyInAlabama

[CrazyInAlabama]

4 p.m. reruns-

First (2013)-

Pro Basketball Player Sued – Plaintiff Betty Brothers suing defendant/ former pro basketball player, Lamar Wright for the value of furniture, she claims $2500, and defendant claims plaintiff is exaggerating the furniture’s value.  Defendant says furniture price was $1500, and he paid $1250, and only owes $250 more.   Money was paid by defendant’s manager, Aurora.  

Marie Valencourt is plaintiff’s witness, and the apartment manager, testifies against defendant.

JJ says the $1250 sounds more like half payment, not most of the price.

$1250 to plaintiff.    

Car Conundrum -Plaintiff Valerie Bagala suing defendant/ex-boyfriend Josiah Quintana for the price of a Prius.  Plaintiff had a Honda 2005 Accord LX, but was buying a new house, and defendant was going to live with her.   Defendant wanted the Honda, worth $6k, so he would take out the loan on the Prius, of $6,000.   So, the loan for the Prius would be paid by defendant, and he would take the Honda, and plaintiff’s Prius loan would be paid off.     They broke up, and defendant got in the car and left.  

Then, defendant stopped paying on the Prius loan.    Defendant will keep the Honda, which he doesn’t want, he now wants the Prius.   Defendant wants payments for Prius back, repairs on the Honda.  

I’m hoping all of the titles, registrations and insurance are in order for the vehicles too.  Title for Honda will be signed over to defendant, and when Prius is paid off plaintiff will have title to be put in her name. 

Plaintiff will keep Prius, defendant will keep the Honda, and plaintiff will get $1900, to pay off the Prius loan.    Both litigants keep whining.  Plaintiff interrupts so often, that JJ sends them back to small claims where they came from.

Second (2012)-

Domestic Dispute -Plaintiff Alice Ragsdale suing defendant Jeffrey Pedersen   for breaking her wrist during an argument, unpaid rent, and the cost of a vacation.     Man denies breaking his ex-fiancee’s wrist during an argument over rent money, and claims of cheating.  

Plaintiff wants half a month’s rent back, and medical bills, and vacation costs.    Defendant claims plaintiff never paid rent, and they lived in his residence.     Defendant says he paid rent, utilities, and plaintiff paid her own bills.    Defendant says furniture plaintiff wants was from a rental company, and she gave it back to them, and defendant has nothing belonging to plaintiff.   Plaintiff produces several eviction notices from defendant in April, and he started legal proceedings to get plaintiff evicted.  JJ says if plaintiff was a non-paying tenant, then eviction won’t work, and there is still no proof plaintiff paid any rent.    Defendant’s mother lived upstairs in the home too, and she gave the first eviction notice to plaintiff, and then a couple of weeks later, defendant gave plaintiff another eviction notice.  

Defendant says plaintiff came home from a few days in the hospital, and accused him of cheating on her, and she wanted her rent back.    Defendant says plaintiff grabbed his wallet, then he grabbed her credit cards, and he traded them back to plaintiff for his wallet back.  

Plaintiff submits medical records for the broken wrist.   (Sorry, JJ, living with, and being engaged to someone doesn’t mean that person is sane, or not abusive).   After broken wrist, plaintiff called police, but no arrest of defendant occurred.   

Defendant’s niece is his witness, she certainly dramatizes the volatile relationship between the two litigants.   Niece Jennifer Neumann, also shows why over doing spray tan is a bad idea, she’s rather orange.

I believe the defendant, and his niece.      Defendant niece, says she saw the assault on defendant by plaintiff.   Niece says she saw plaintiff arguing on the porch with defendant, and his mother, and plaintiff was egging defendant on, following defendant into house.  Niece says plaintiff assaulted her with a phone cord.  

Both litigants were granted orders of protection against each other.  Defendant broke order by leaving a voice mail on plaintiff’s phone. 

Plaintiff’s witness Darylyne Osborne is plaintiff’s friend, and gave her a ride to hospital, and after took plaintiff back to the litigant’s residence.    Plaintiff is using witness’ address, but witness says plaintiff never stayed with her because her public housing prohibits guests. 

JJ believes plaintiff, $250 to plaintiff.   (Note to plaintiff crying in the hall-terview without tears or red eyes, is not crying, it’s faking it).

5 p.m. reruns-

First (2016)-

Knife Fight Threat-Plaintiff Jermaine Minter claims defendant Treyvon King, threatened him with a knife at his home, in front of his little daughter.  This happened in Chicago.   Defendant apparently sees nothing wrong with taking a knife to threaten people at their home.   Defendant claims plaintiff punched his younger brother, brother was hospitalized, and the threat with the knife was justified.   After fight between plaintiff, and defendant’s brother, defendant went to plaintiff’s home, with a friend, and a knife (only the second time), then the threatening with a knife happened.   Plaintiff claims defendant came to his house with seven people.   

Defendant's younger brother can’t join us in the courtroom, he's been on house arrest for months, but the actual crime isn't discussed.     (I believe JJ wants to beat both litigants up) Plaintiff is upset because he claims the defendant and his family confronted plaintiff's eight-year-old daughter when she was at school, and told her they were going to beat up her father.   

Why do I have the suspicion that a search on any of the litigants, or witnesses would show it's not their first time in court.  

Case dismissed.   

Meter Fraud-Plaintiff Diane Chapman, and adult daughters (aka Dumb and Dumber) are suing defendants/former landlords David  Riacett and wife, Eleanor Coverrubius for meter fraud, harassment, false restraining orders.   Defendant is counter suing for harassment, theft of property, and damages.  Plaintiffs rented property for one year.   Now they're claiming the electric service was only one meter, but it was used to power one light bulb in the work shop, and trailer.  It says in the written lease that rent was reduced $50 a month to compensate for the electric bill.  Plaintiff stayed for the one-year lease period.   It would be nice if plaintiff's adult daughter would stop glaring at everyone.   

Defendant did not bring paperwork about the electricity, then says it was an oral agreement.  Unfortunately, since it was an oral modification to the written contract, it's not enforceable.     Also, defendant says a pre-hung door from the workshop was stolen by the plaintiff's daughter's boyfriend, and it's on camera.     

Plaintiff upset because the one daughter had a restraining order taken out on her by landlord for the entire year before plaintiff and other daughter moved in, that means the one daughter couldn't live in the trailer or visit.   

Personally, after seeing the mother and daughter in court, I would never have rented to any of them.  They seem very mean.       Plaintiff claims landlords forged the lease, and they whited out the two daughters names off of the lease, and forged the plaintiff's signature.   Fortunately, plaintiff and demon spawn, have moved.   This case was filed two years after the moveout.

In the hall-terview he sounds like every person I know that was a landlord, and had issues.  Quote "I'll burn the #### place down before I rent it again".

$600 to plaintiffs for electricity, and that's all.   However, I don't think the plaintiffs deserved a penny.   

Second (2016)-

Single Woman Snafu! -Plaintiffs (boyfriend) Kenneth Hay, and Donna Lawson (girlfriend), are suing the ex-girlfriend defendant, Melissa Stout-Corriveau, and claim plaintiff man let her use a joint debit card, for car rental fees, towing fees, and claim she tried to get a false restraining order.     Plaintiff man claims the defendant is a friend of many years, not a girlfriend. (I don't believe the not a girlfriend story about the defendant at all).         Plaintiff girlfriend wasn't happy about lending the defendant their car.    

Plaintiff says defendant has spare vehicles, and felt sorry for the defendant, and wanted the car out his name.   The car was loaned to defendant in July, for four weeks, and then it was traded in by the plaintiff girlfriend, for another car.   When the plaintiffs broke up, they had joint cars, individual cars, and she wanted it cleared up.     

The credit card for the rental car was a joint plaintiff card, and man paid for the rental car, and he didn't discuss paying for the rental car, or loaning the other car (titled to both plaintiffs) to defendant.     Plaintiff girlfriend was really ticked about defendant/not a girlfriend's, car use, and credit use.   (In my experience, using a debit card for rentals is a terrible idea, the company puts a hold on the account for a lot of money).   When plaintiffs filed police charges for stealing their garage remote, and burglary, and next day lawsuit was filed against defendant by plaintiffs.   So, defendant tried to file for restraining orders against both plaintiffs.

Rental car fees included toll fees, $442 in collections, plus almost $243 not in collections, $212 in toll road violations, plus $90 from Hertz, rental car fees outstanding, $840.  Plaintiff man, and defendant claim the rental car was a gift.     So, plaintiffs filed burglary and theft charges against the defendant.       False restraining order claim by defendant is denied by JJ.    Toll fees are still racking up on defendant's car.  

Defendant filed for restraining orders against both plaintiffs.     Defendant is a realtor (Melissa Stout-Corriveau), so the burglary, and theft charges hurt her career.     There are Facebook messages acknowledging the debt for the car, and tows, etc.     

$2038 to the plaintiffs.    

My Sister the Moocher!-Plaintiffs (sister) Raven Buchta and (her man bun wearing boyfriend)  Damian Jordan, are suing her sister/defendant Kissaundra Moreno for mooching.    Of course, sister claims it was all a gift.   

Defendant moved out due to "a lack of disrespect" by man bun plaintiff. (That is the exact quote). 

Defendant moved in with sister, and agreed to pay rent for $500 a month, stayed for 11 months.     Defendant moved out after a verbal altercation with man bun.   

Plaintiff girlfriend bought a gun membership for man bun, and sister wants part of the cost of that from defendant.  They also want money for a mini fridge for the defendant, but that was left behind in plaintiff's house.  JJ tells plaintiff to sell the minifridge.

Nothing for either set of litigants.   

Edited October 8, 2021 by CrazyInAlabama

[Cozytea]

I've been watching old episodes on Pluto Tv. Judy was much nicer back in the day (90's)lol. Some rambled on and on. Who slept with who ect. 

I did enjoy an episode today on my regular tv schedule, it was old  2013. This woman was suing her landlord for her security deposit.  The woman had a boyfriend who burned the house down 6 days after they recieved the keys. He purposely did it. The couple were fighting.  I couldn't believe the nerve of this woman. 

[Brattinella]

Hi, folks.  I haven't been watching daytime TV in yonks, but I checked in here for JJ and JM.  Is JJ off the air?  Is she okay?

[CrazyInAlabama]

(All week, 4 p.m. reruns are 2012 and 2013, 5 p.m. reruns are all 2016)

4 p.m. reruns-

First (2013)-

Burning Down the House -Plaintiff /former tenant Jessica Brown suing defendant/landlord Laura McIntyre for return of her security deposit.    Plaintiff and boyfriend were both on lease, as tenants, and plaintiff’s three children moved in also, because landlord didn’t think Jessica could pay the lease herself.

When plaintiff, and children moved in, boyfriend Richard moved in with her. Six days after moving in plaintiff, and boyfriend had an argument, and boyfriend. Richard, burned the house down deliberately.   The lease says any fire or other event caused by tenant is responsibility of tenant.    Plaintiff submits another lease, signed only by plaintiff, and landlady.    There is a valid lease with both plaintiffs’ dated 9 January, then another lease on 13 January with only Jessica on it.     Landlady says the second lease was to help plaintiff get custody of her three children.     

Plaintiff claims boyfriend only signed lease, but wasn’t to move in, so unless there is an agreement to remove boyfriend’s name from lease, second lease with only Jessica’s name on it isn’t valid.    On 15 January plaintiff and boyfriend got the keys, boyfriend moved his stuff in, and Jessica and Richard argued about him moving in.   Then, boyfriend called police on Jessica. 

Former landlord is counter suing former tenant for an insurance deductible, and loss of profits.  

Defendant’s home was thoroughly destroyed after purchase, renovation, and then the fire destroyed it.   There is an arrest warrant for boyfriend, but he hasn’t been arrested.  Plaintiff claims she told defendant about boyfriend’s criminal record.

Plaintiff case dismissed.  

Defendant receives $ .  They didn’t mention if defendant received money or not. I’m hoping defendant received the $4900 she requested.

Short Sale Showdown -Plaintiff/ex-wife Dawn Feibel is suing defendant/ex-husband Edward Tinnivigliu for profits from their former home after a divorce.   The couple had three children, plaintiff took over the home, but didn’t refinance the home in 36 months, which was required in the divorce settlement.

When home was sold, profits were split, and plaintiff wants defendant’s money.

JJ sends case back to local family court, again.

Second (2012)-

Violent Hissy Fit Caught on Tape -Plaintiff/home owner Maria Kantzas suing defendant/ neighbor Alicia Franchi  for beating on the front door at plaintiff’s house, when they were arguing at plaintiff’s home, all recorded on video.   When plaintiff came home, defendant claimed plaintiff was staring at her (the she looked at me funny scenario).    Defendant claims plaintiff said the same garbage to her, that plaintiff claims defendant said to her.   

After the arguing started, plaintiff went go inside her house, and that’s when defendant started beating on plaintiff’s front door.    Plaintiff says defendant broke the front screen door, and the regular door, and then video is produced.     JJ has to threaten to book plaintiff witness, and defendant.  

Video shows plaintiff entering her house, and defendant pounding on the front door.   JJ says defendant had a hissy fit.  Plaintiff says defendant’s been acting like this for six years.

Plaintiff receives $54 for the door repair.    Defendant’s ridiculous counter claim dismissed.

Hospital Bed Handout -Plaintiff Kelly Coughlan suing defendant/ex-boyfriend Larry Willis III for return of $1,000 defendant borrowed from plaintiff, while plaintiff was in the hospital.  $1,000 was to play for defendant’s car purchase.  Defendant says plaintiff gave him the money, plaintiff claims it was theft.

Defendant says plaintiff had $1,000 cash in the hospital, and she pulled it out and gave him the money.

$1,000 to plaintiff.

5 p.m. reruns-

First (2016)-

Retirement Payday Fail-Plaintiff/ex-girlfriend Kimberly Storey suing defendant/ex-boyfriend Vernon “Wayne” Crutcher for an unpaid loan to pay his mortgage.   Plaintiff gave defendant three cashier's checks adding up to $5k, instead of a checking account check (she thought it would be a better record than a regular check, wrong idea).   The litigants were living in defendant's house, and paid no rent.    Plaintiff claimed she bought air conditioning for his house, a recliner, and other items. 

Defendant was unemployed for a while, but still supported plaintiff, and supported her during, and after her trip to rehab.   Plaintiff claims she sent keys and rings back to defendant, but defendant claims he didn't receive rings back.   Plaintiff claims defendant was getting retirement money, and would pay her back when defendant’s money arrived. 

 Hall-terview is interesting, defendant claims they were engaged, but she was married to someone else at the time, and still is. 

$5,000 to plaintiff.   

Teen Drives Into Wall-Plaintiff Diana Whittle suing defendants/cousin, car owner Tierra Young and defendant’s brother, Tyshawn Stearns,  for damage to her bedroom wall.   Defendant borrowed his sister's car, and drove it through the plaintiff's bedroom wall.      Plaintiff's brother was implicated by the defendant driver, but he denies ever driving a car, and says plaintiff mother doesn't even own a car.    Plaintiff son was going to sneak out to meet defendant driver, to go to a party, and that's when the defendant driver hit the house wall.  Defendant brother says plaintiff’s 15-year-old son was driving when the accident happened.  

Defendant driver still only has a learner's permit, and his cousin/defendant is surprised that her insurance didn't pay for the damages from an uninsured, unlicensed driver.   Defendant car owner gives cousin permission to drive her car all of the time.    Defendant car owner still doesn't think that the cousin's learner's permit should require a licensed driver with him at all times behind the wheel.    JJ thinks plaintiff son was driving, but either way an uninsured, and unlicensed person hit the house, with defendant’s car. 

$1,600 to fix the wall, and plaintiff gets that.  

Second (2016)-

Puppy Choking on Chicken Bone Drama?!-Unfortunately, I remember this one.   

Plaintiff Shelly Vick  suing dog owner/defendant Katie Morrison and husband Scotty Morrison for dog’s vet bills, $557.    Plaintiff took a puppy to the vet, for treatment that costs $557.    After owners were letting 'nature take its course', when puppy choked on a chicken bone, plaintiff took the puppy to the vet.     

Plaintiff was 'fostering' the puppies, when defendant's Chihuahua had puppies.    Defendant woman also claims the mother Chihuahua is 25 pounds, and was only 8 months when she dug out of the yard, and was knocked up.   Defendant knew dog was in heat, but it wasn't house trained, and so they left the mother dog outside.     Plaintiff had previously fostered the puppies for September, and October.

Plaintiff saw the puppy the defendant's kept looked thin, and sick.   Defendants left the dog laying alone outside to die, so a couple of days later plaintiff took the puppy to the vet.  Vet report says puppy had bone in throat, the bone had to be surgically removed.     Defendants claim plaintiff stole the dog, and they called the police to get the puppy back.    I wonder how many litters the mother has had by now?    

Sadly, the defendants still have the dog in their possession, and called the police to get the puppy back.       Defendant/ owner refused to pay the vet bills, and neighbor wants to be repaid.  Defendant's wife's defense is they had only had the puppy four days, and that's a bogus reason, because the puppy was born in that house.     

Plaintiff gets $557, too bad she didn't get the puppy too.  

[CrazyInAlabama]

4 p.m. reruns-

First (2013)-Sorry Missed the cases, but trust me, you had more fun than I did.

Second (2012)-

Valentine’s Day Warrant Pay-Off -Plaintiff Hailey Dooley suing defendant Lead Foot (missed his real name) McAdams for not paying her back for paying off defendant’s warrants.   Parents called defendant and told him there were warrants out for him, so plaintiff paid them off, but defendant never paid her back.

Defendant is very happy to say he already has at least 12 speeding tickets, and two suspensions, in Texas where he’s from.   JJ points out to him that when he kills someone, they’ll play this part of the case before doing the victim impact statement.

$500 to plaintiff.

5 p.m. reruns-

First (2016)-

Nervy Squatter Lawsuit-Plaintiff Heidi Janiero was renting condo from owner, overstayed lease, and was served a three-day notice to quit in June, and left the end of August, but wants more rent from defendant, Stephanie Hernandez.  Defendant was locked out in July, moved back in August.      Plaintiff was shorting or not paying rent.   Defendant was a roommate of squatter plaintiff.   Plaintiff wants rent from roommate, lock change fees, and attorney’s fee.    (Note to plaintiff, if your eyes don't even open, then your fake eyelashes are way too big, and heavy).  JJ calls landlord to see if plaintiff ever caught up on the rent.  Plaintiff claims she was only a week behind when she was given the notice to quit, or pay up. 

 Defendant was locked out in June, back in condo in August, and moved out the end of August.   Plaintiff wants July rent from defendant, but plaintiff had locked her out.   Defendant couldn’t go back to condo until the hearing for the restraining order was held, and judge granted defendant the restraining order against plaintiff.     Defendant had possessions in the condo in August, but didn't live there (after police were called by plaintiff twice, claiming defendant was a burglar).   Defendant had to get a restraining order to move back in August (JJ says no rent owed from defendant). 

Nothing for plaintiff, or defendant. 

Well-Behaved Courtroom Dog-Plaintiff Corey Furniss  suing defendant Viani Bolanos for her dog attacking plaintiff's dog (I think a Papillon).   Plaintiff says defendant was outside the non-leash area, with her dogs off leash, outside the fenced/gated dog park.   Defendant has a Husky, and Chihuahua, and Husky attacked plaintiff's dog.  The plaintiff's adorable dog is maybe 10 pounds or so, and is totally quiet in court.   

Defendant's stupid story is that plaintiff was going to kick her Husky, and that made her dog defensive, and she claims there was no attack.      Tiny plaintiff's dog wakes up when JJ yells at defendant, and is still totally quiet.   

Defendant lies about her dogs being in the dog park, then went outside (supposedly gate to dog park was broken), and then came in dog park, and attack was all plaintiff's fault.    Injury photos are very bad, I'm surprised the little dog lived.   

$864 for plaintiff.

Second (2016)-

Father Shields Negligent Teenager-Plaintiff Keisha  Austin suing 17-year-old driver, Ryan Del Rio, and his father Luis Del Rio, (and mother Kristine Del Rio) for automobile damage from teen hitting defendant’s car.    Plaintiff was turning left off of highway (she didn’t have a stop sign), and defendant teen pulled out from stop sign, and hit entire driver's side of plaintiff's car.  Both cars were insured, and everyone had a license.     Father of teen arrived at accident scene, and asked plaintiff to not call police, and said he would pay for damage.     Then when defendant's father refused to pay for car damage, and lied to his insurance company about the accident, so his insurance rates wouldn't go up.   

Teen driver also stands up at the display board and lies about the accident too. Teen says plaintiff hit his car while she was turning left.    After this the plaintiff’s car was rear ended, and car was totaled, but it was a reduced amount because of previous accident damage.   

JJ awards nothing, because woman received more money that car was worth.  

Shouting Out Not Allowed-Plaintiff Bruce Blair suing ex roommate Joyce Casey for theft of his property.   The two litigants were just roommates, matched up to rent house by realtor who rented the house.   Defendant locked plaintiff out of the house, and he couldn't retrieve his property.    Only defendant signed the lease with the realtor.   Plaintiff claims he was never served with counter claim by defendant, so she has to refile in their location.    Defendant received a TRO, and plaintiff couldn't go back into the residence.       

JJ is right, defendant should live alone.    Defendant saying how scared she was of wimpy plaintiff is so unbelievable.     Defendant says man only left trash behind, and she disposed of it all.   

$0 for plaintiff.  (Plaintiff won't shut up, and gets his case dismissed, after he says defendant is a meth user).  If he kept his mouth shut, he would have been paid, but too bad. 

[Taeolas]

On 10/11/2021 at 7:27 PM, Brattinella said:

Hi, folks.  I haven't been watching daytime TV in yonks, but I checked in here for JJ and JM.  Is JJ off the air?  Is she okay?

Judge Judy as a TV show has ended as of last month. Though the repeats will continue as long as the networks keep airing them. 

 

I usually watch on WSBK from Boston, and they seem to preempt JJ at the drop of rain, but the PVR says more eps are still being aired. Ditto for the 5pm eps on the Boston CBS station. 

 

As for Judge Judy herself, she has a new series starting on IMDB TV (a "free" streaming service) in November. As more details of the new series are coming out, it seems to be turning more and more people off of it. (Specifically Officer Byrd was apparently not even asked if he might want to join Judy on the new show, and when he was asked, he was basically brushed off). See the "Judge Judy In the Media" thread for more details. 

 

Combined with the feud Judy had with CBS at the end of the series, I'm not surprised that the series is basically petering out on network/syndicated TV. (As far as I can tell there was NO indication of the final season or final episodes in the promotion of the show. They barely begrudgingly added a Silver logo "25th Anniversary" tag to the last season). I suppose with no "Final episodes!" and "Final Season!" tags, it makes it easier to keep reairing repeats or something. 

[CrazyInAlabama]

4 p.m. reruns-

First (2013)-

Pit Bull Attacks Child – Plaintiff Jamiene Andreozzi   suing defendant / pit bull owner, Patricia Bautista for defendant’s dog attacking her 8-year-old son.   Son was skateboarding at a playdate with another friend, says the dog stuck its head through the wrought iron gate (vertical rods, rather far apart), and son says dog bit him.  Plaintiff contacted an attorney right after the bite, before plaintiff claims her son had PTSD/nightmares.   Attorney wouldn’t pursue the case. 

Son Elijah Panner testifies to JJ., that he was skating with a friend, went close to the gate, when dog put his head through the fence, and bit him.     

After the bite, Elijah called his mom, she came to friend’s house and picked him up, visited defendant Bautista, then to the hospital.     Defendant claims her fence was brought down the same day as the bite.   Defense witness didn’t see anything (obviously just wanted a trip to court).

Plaintiff submits pictures of fence, there the bottom horizontal rail of fence is broken where the bottom of fence pickets should be secured.  The chicken wire at the bottom of the fence was smashed down, so the Pit’s head can fit through the fence.   JJ points out that the failed chicken wire to keep the Pits (defendant owns more than one) was replaced later.   Defendant had smaller dogs at one time, but only has the bigger Pits now, so why did she need to replace the chicken wire?

Plaintiff receives $1500 for medical bills. 

Giants vs. Cowboys Letdown -Plaintiff Devendra Ruparelia suing defendant/ticket seller, Jarmar Richardson to get money back plaintiff paid defendant for football game tickets that turned out to be bogus. 

Later defendant claims plaintiff bought basketball tickets from defendant, but plaintiff says he didn’t want to go to another game, and doesn’t trust defendant.   Defendant reluctantly tells JJ who he bought the football tickets from.   David who sold the tickets is back in prison.  

Defendant is sweating so badly that Officer Byrd has to take him Kleenex to mop his sweat of shame.  Defendant claims plaintiff later bought NBA basketball tickets from him, in return for the football tickets.

Plaintiff receives $350. 

Second (2012)-

Ex-Vandalism & Drug Trafficking? -Plaintiff Joseph Boyd  suing defendant Amanda Kydd for stealing his electronics, and spray painting his car green.    Unwed parents accuse each other of vandalism, theft, and drug trafficking.  JJ is really ticked when she finds out plaintiff spent $4,000 cash on various electronics, while being barely employed.     Defendant says she painted a car, but it was her car. 

Defendant says they were both evicted from the apartment, because plaintiff was dealing drugs.    Apartment was a low income apartment, where plaintiff lived with defendant, and his two children, and they paid $2 a month, and Officer Byrd paid everything else.   Litigants were finally evicted two months later on the drug allegations, one son that is plaintiff’s child with defendant, is living with grandparents.   The second child is defendant’s with someone else, and lives with defendant in her grandmother’s house.   Plaintiff lives with his parents, and someone else has custody of that child.    Story is car belongs to defendant, and plaintiff thought it was funny when it was painted.    JJ will not pay for the car repainting.    As always, plaintiff doesn’t have a license.   

Plaintiff says while he was moving home to mommy’s house, defendant stole the TV, Xbox, 3-D Blu Ray player, $3457 is the total of the ‘stolen’ electronics.  JJ wants to know how a man on subsidized rent, food stamps, unemployed, spend $3457 on the electronics.  

Plaintiff case dismissed.   Defendant says the $4,000 was made by plaintiff by drug dealing.

Bowling Wii Disaster -Plaintiff Marci and Richard Culton are suing defendant Ian Henkel (he’s the plaintiff wife’s daughter’s fiance’s brother) over his 6-year-old destroying plaintiff’s TV by letting go of Wii controller, and it hitting the TV.  However, daughter of plaintiff, Sarah Ferderer, was babysitting little Kolby at the time.    I bet the lack of supervision by plaintiff’s daughter will sink the plaintiff’s case.

Ian Henkel came to plaintiff’s house, to look at a tree that needed to be removed.    Then, Kolby went back in the house, and plaintiff witness, Sarah Ferderer, daughter of plaintiff wife, came outside and said remote slipped out of Kolby’s hand and hit the TV, and TV was broken.  

Plaintiffs get $999 for TV.

5 p.m. reruns-

First (2016)-

Thanksgiving Day Breakdown-Plaintiff Ryan Riemenschneider suing defendant/ex-girlfriend Kathryn Anderson, for unpaid rent.  Long term partners split up romantically, and became roommates, still living in the same apartment.  They broke up in November 2015, and became roommates, and defendant never paid the rent or utilities until she moved out in June 2016.     Defendant’s witness is her new boyfriend.  

 Defendant gives JJ some carbon copies of checks, but doesn't have actual proof of any payments.

$2250 to plaintiff.

Sun Roof Strife-Plaintiff Louise Chatman is suing defendant Stephanie Boyd for sun roof damage on plaintiff’s car.   Plaintiff needed a place to stay, for plaintiff and her two children, and paid no rent, but they were all living with a friend who was paying the rent for everyone.      

 Defendant says plaintiff was delivering pizza, and defendant was babysitting plaintiff's baby in the car.    Defendant also borrowed plaintiff's car to drop off plaintiff's kid at day care, and then said she dropped an ink pen in the sun roof track, and the sun roof broke.   (How do you drop a pen in the sun roof track?)

After the broken sunroof they all lived together for almost a year, then the court case was filed.   Defendant says they were all doing a police report about the car accident, and that's when she dropped the pen.  Plaintiff says there was no accident, and no police report. 

Plaintiff receives $580.58.  (I wouldn’t have paid plaintiff a penny, the stories of both litigants are very bizarre, and very unbelievable).

Second (2016)-

Break-Up Fit of Rage-Plaintiff Dustyn Boyd suing ex-girlfriend/defendant Jessica Whisenhunt for car loan, property damages, and bail bond. Plaintiff and ex-girlfriend lived together for about a year, and plaintiff loaned girlfriend money to buy a car ($1000), and paid for a bail bond.     When the two litigants were drinking, they argued, and plaintiff says defendant broke his TV.  Defendant recalls nothing.  Plaintiff claims defendant has a severe drinking problem. 

He can forget the car loan, because that wasn't a loan at all.   After she smashed his car window, he bonded her out of jail, and they still kept living together.   

Case dismissed.     

No Backsies-Plaintiffs Natasha Lenz, Rayla Arnold, and Darby Smith, were roommates with defendant, Karina Silverstein, and want back rent after defendant moved out.   

Plaintiffs told defendant to leave and find her own apartment, defendant did that, and now plaintiffs want back rent.   

Defendant did exactly what the coven of roommates told her to do, so she owes nothing.   

Nothing for despicable plaintiffs.  Defendant will have to tell landlord that when plaintiffs leave the apartment, she wants her security back.   Defendant wants to be taken off the lease. 

Edited October 13, 2021 by CrazyInAlabama

[CrazyInAlabama]

4 p.m. reruns-

First (2013)-

Angry Tenant Break-In? -Plaintiff/former tenant Noemi Camacho is suing defendants/landlords Pamela Hall and Clinton Golden for return of deposit, and rent back.  Plaintiff rented a home from defendants, and house needed repair and would be ready by 1 April.   However, plaintiff demanded to move in before remodeling was done, but plaintiff claims house wasn’t livable.    Plaintiff signed a document that house would be ready by mid-April, but she demanded to move in by April 6 or 7. 

Plaintiff admits she signed document about time frame of remodeling.   Another twist is plaintiff is on Section 8 for part of the rent, so how can you move in before house passes Section 8 inspection?   My understanding is Section 8 inspections must be passed before the tenant can either move into Section 8, or move to another home also under Section 8.    

Plaintiff gets the rent refund and deposit $900, because property wasn’t finished by the date it was supposed to be.  Defendants claim plaintiff damaged house.   Plaintiff claims she never moved in, just had her stuff in the house for a week.     The back sliding door is shattered, and plaintiff did it.   Plaintiff claims locks were changed and a sheriff’s deputy told her to get in any way she needed to.

Plaintiff’s deposit, minus door costs of $1560 to defendants for door, So, after deducting damages from deposit, $275 to landlords. 

$4,000 Tuition Scam? -Plaintiff Harland Kayani suing defendant Carl Woolsoncroft, a loan for college tuition.   Defendant needed tuition, so plaintiff claims he gave defendant $4,000, and defendant never repaid him.    Defendant claims money was a gift, not a loan.

Defendant only went to Erie Community College for one term, not a year, and only took 4 credits.   However, it turns out when defendant was supposed to be enrolled, he wasn’t. Defendant didn’t use money for school, but instead paid off his car note.

Plaintiff receives $3300.

Second (2012)-

Don’t Touch My Wife! -Plaintiff Dwayne Murray suing defendant Michael Wright (cousin of plaintiff) and Alicia Wright (wife of defendant) for an assault on plaintiff’s wife at a drunken party at defendant’s house.  When plaintiff and wife arrived at the party, plaintiff noticed underage drunks, and lots of others were drunk.   When plaintiff wife, Karen Murray, was trying to leave the party, some party goer physically assaulted her, and husband went to his wife’s defense.   Plaintiff’s injury pictures are awful.

Then, drunken party guest attacks plaintiff husband, and plaintiff claims Michael Wright was holding him down, so other party goers could assault him.   Plaintiff called the police.    Assault case was dismissed by DA.  Plaintiff suffered a closed head injury, broken nose, busted lip, broken foot, and numerous bruises.

Defendant Michael Wright claims Dwayne Murray attacked his own wife, Karen Murray.

Defendant claims plaintiff assaulted his own wife, and then assaulted defendant for no reason.   Defendant claims a mob from the party assaulted plaintiff, and defendant only punched plaintiff once.

$2500 to plaintiff.  (I would have given plaintiff $5,000, with an additional $2500 for pain and suffering).

Hookah Pipe Party Mishap -Plaintiff Joanne Navarro (mother of the two sons) suing defendant Sunya Ungar for damaging her sofa while smoking a hookah. David Navarro, son of plaintiff was smoking a hookah, with his brother, and defendant, when the couch was damaged.      (Hookah has tobacco in it).

Plaintiff says sons only use the hookah in the garage, but this day it burned the living room couch.  David Navarro admits the brothers smoke the hookah in the living room when the mother is out of the house.  Defendant says the plaintiff’s are the ones who caused the damage.

$0 to plaintiff.   JJ tells plaintiff to have older son get a job and pay for the couch.   

5 p.m. reruns-

First (2016)-

Tree Huggers v. Tree Choppers-Plaintiff Christine Boiger suing trailer park neighbor/defendant Elizabeth Allen  with mutual property line for the survey costs, and fence damage.    Plaintiff did survey because she said defendant's fence was on her property.  The women share a back fence.  

Fence was encroaching, and it was taken down, and another fence defendant built was encroaching on plaintiff's property again, and it impacted the plaintiff's fence posts.    They also cut the plaintiff's cable (someone should be shot for that.  I've had repeated cable cut issues from new builds, and it's freaking infuriating).     No one is getting survey costs.   

Sorry JJ, you don't put your fence on my property, not even an inch, or on the joint property line.   

Defendant got HOA permission to trim her trees, but buttinsky plaintiff told neighbors to leave the trees alone, and actually stood in the way of the tree cutters.   So, defendant's company could only cut half of the trees, and they were all on defendant's property.     

Cases dismissed.   

Mistaken Trailer Identity-  Plaintiff Gordon Lacey is suing defendant Scott Kulman,  for stealing his utility trailer (a flat open trailer, utility trailer).     Trailer was stolen in August, plaintiff has police report.   

In October, defendant's employee, Jeff, was at a stop light, and plaintiff signaled him to pull over, and they stopped at a gas station.    Plaintiff accused defendant employee of having his stolen trailer.      Police were called, and trailer was confiscated, pending clarification of ownership.   

Defendant claims trailer was bought in 2012.   Plaintiff claims his trailer was homemade, not the manufactured trailer the defendant owns.   

Police confirmed the VIN number and license plate were correct with defendant's paperwork, matched the VIN number on the trailer, and police released the trailer to defendant.   

My guess is plaintiff will never give up calling defendant a thief, and the hall-terview interview with plaintiff reinforces that idea, he will never quit.  

Case dismissed. 

Second (2016)-

Car Dumped on Ex-Wife-   Plaintiff/ex-wife Sandra Beeson was married seven months to defendant/ex-husband Calvin Spring, they bought a joint car, and divorced.   He didn't want Ford Escape any longer, with twelve payments pending.  He put the keys in her mailbox, and left SUV at her house, and left.      Plaintiff put $800 down, and a month later defendant took the SUV, kept it for three years, making payments, and then dumped it at plaintiff's house.   

 Defendant sold car to Car Max, and still owed $1547 on loan, and plaintiff gets $1547.  This should have all been decided in divorce court.  Then defendant goes far stage left (our right). (I love it when they stomp out of court, and get the wrong door).  

$1547 to plaintiff.

Judge Judy Calling-Plaintiff Latoya McNatt  suing defendant Robert Goodson for money she paid for Jeep Grand Cherokee, defendant had the title, and donated the car (or so he claims).    Defendant is count suing for tickets and impound fees, and claims he donated the SUV to a family, or as JJ says, he gave it away. 

JJ sends Byrd over to make sure defendant only gets her the phone number, and she goes to her office to call the man.    Mr. Cornell (new owner of car) bought car for $500.   Defendant says plaintiff never had SUV registered to her, kept getting tickets, and car was impounded.   Plaintiff says she didn't register car in her name, because she didn't have the title. 

Defendant received $1,000 from plaintiff, and $500 from the current owner, and since plaintiff drove car for seven months, she gets $475,   

Edited October 14, 2021 by CrazyInAlabama