All Episodes Talk: All Rise

[maggiemae]

IMO JJ has gone to the dark side. She is certainly not RBG in her "bun (and collar)  and 2 carat diamond earrings.

Haven't watched in a year or 2 but she is still mean.

I get she has to get her show  in a 20 ish time frame. But she is mean. 

[CrazyInAlabama]

3 p.m. reruns, probably 2017-

First-

$100,000 Dog Attack Nightmare-Plaintiff Tasha suing neighbor Tosha over defendant's Rhodesian Ridgeback.   Plaintiff says the dog got loose, and frightened plaintiff and her one year old child, and both fell.    Plaintiff says dog was let out, in the fenced yard, and dog was trying to get over fence.    Fence looks light a 4 ft chain link, and that's nothing for a Rhodesian Ridgeback to go over, even a young one.   Plaintiff says dog jumped over the fence, and then wiggled back through gate.   

Plaintiff says her older daughter was previously bitten repeatedly, and had several stitches, and the dog also belonged to defendant (that dog went to live with grandpa on the farm), and that case was settled for $51K, but it was $38K after fees.   Homeowner was cancelled after the claim, and there is no more insurance.       

Plaintiff in this case was in her driveway, and hurt her leg trying to get the one year old out of the way, and also wants money for the one year old's injuries when plaintiff threw her out of the way.     Defendant witness is the defendant's younger daughter, who wasn't the witness that day.  Defendant's older daughter was the witness, but she didn't come to court.   Plaintiff and defendant are whining about which daughter saw what.    (To paraphrase Judge Marilyn Milian [spelling] "I wouldn't believe any of the litigants or witnesses if their tongues were notarized".      I find it interesting that plaintiff has animal control reports, but can't open them, so has no proof.     JJ talks to the daughter of defendant, who claims the dog was never outside of the fence.  Case dismissed, there is no proof of any dog attack, or escape.  

Second-

Parent of the Year in the Hot Seat-Plaintiff suing ex-boyfriend for car parts he charged to her credit card, and never repaid.    Plaintiff is a care giver for $8.00 an hour, and defendant claims to make $500 to $800 a week, off the books.   (No JJ, plaintiff witness mom doesn't look like the plaintiff's sister, and needs a few teeth replaced.   And plaintiff's big heart chest tattoo is ludicrous).    And defendant is a Sainted Single Father of Two (SSFT) a four and five year old, and has a drag race car as a hobby.  The drag car is his five year old's dream.   Charges were $1200 to $1500 for the parts, and the car didn't even race.   JJ threatens to put a lien on the race car.   Defendant just called her "Miss Judy", I hope Byrd removes him from the Earth.     JJ says that there is an IRS agent assigned to watch her show, and take care of people who cheat the government.    Defendant kept using credit card online, and then cut her off.   $1500 to plaintiff.  

Runaway Pit Bull Puppy-Plaintiff suing defendant/neighbor for return of pit bull puppy.  Plaintiff bought pit bull puppy from her sister-in-law (witness).   SIL says dogs are purple ribbon registered with OT bullies (United Kennel Club), that registers everything.   SIL owns both bully parents, and doesn't know when the puppies were born, or anything else.  None of the puppies ever went to the vet, and plaintiff witness/breeder claims she sold the puppies for $500 each.    Plaintiff had the puppy for about six weeks, and he was left outside all of the time, and escaped.   Defendant found dog before it was lost according to plaintiff's time line.    Plaintiff didn't call any authorities about lost puppy, and never took dog to vet once (dog was about six to seven months old at this time).   Defendant took puppy to vet, had shots done.  Plaintiff either wants dog back, or $500 she 'paid' for the dog.   Defendant keeps puppy, and plaintiff gets $100.   

[CrazyInAlabama]

5 p.m. episodes, first one new, second one rerun-

First (New)-

Volkswagen Flip Feud-Plaintiff suing former customer for unpaid reupholstery on a 1996 VW bug defendant was restoring to sell.  Plaintiff quote was $3,000-$4,000 depending on the condition of the seats, defendant wanted to pay $750 cash.    Defendant counter suit over windows.  Defendant bought it for $2500 unrestored, which was a bargain, at 87,000 miles.   Restored value is $12-$19,000.   Receipt says $750 was deposit, not total.    Defendant took the VW before it was finished, and refused to pay for the upholstery, or wait until it was finished.  Defendant took VW before headliner was done, or windows were reinstalled, and headliner was falling as plaintiff said it would.    Defendant gives JJ an invoice with no number on it.    Plaintiff gets $2,000 if she gives defendant back his VW windows. 

Second (Rerun)-

The Weaponization of Child Protective Services-Plaintiff suing defendant / ex-girlfriend for bail money, and for false reports to CPS.  Defendant was arrested for perjury.    Defendant claims plaintiff called CPS twice on her, but they are anonymous.      Defendant claims she has text messages from plaintiff threatening to call CPS, but she does not have proof.    There is a police report that plaintiff said defendant let her child with scabies, and measles around other children.    If that's true CPS should have done something about Carberry (defendant).  Defendant case dismissed.   Defendant told CPS that plaintiff offered both of their daughters marijuana.    

Plaintiff bailed defendant out of jail for perjury, and obstruction of justice.  Plaintiff gets bail money $617.  

Tax Fraud Conspiracy-Plaintiff suing painter for damage to home interior.   There is an unsigned contract, for $3800, and work changes from plaintiff changed final bill to $ .   Defendant says plaintiff wanted bill date changed to January so she could deduct it on her taxes (yes, they both admitted tax fraud on national tv.   Hope that IRS agent they assigned to watch court shows caught this one). Work was completed in November 2017, and invoice dated January 2018.    The pictures of the finished paint job are current, but the paint was done over two years ago.    I wonder what the plaintiff cleaned the basement trim with?   It looks like she used a solvent, and that could certainly make the paint melt.   Two year old paint is not going to still be liquid like that.    Defendant has texts from plaintiff saying how much she loves the paint job.   Plaintiff gets zero.   

[bad things are bad]

Volkswagen Flip Feud: I kept yelling "its a packing slip" until Byrd heard me! 

The plaintiff was on the high end for the work described (there may have been more to it than what was discussed on the show), but the guy seemed to make a living flipping cars...he should have known an upholsterer already as well as had a clue about what that work generally costs. 

[basiltherat]

All the Bug Flipper needed to do was to contact his credit card company and get a copy of the invoice.  You know a cheapskate like he is going to get mileage or cash back on his purchases!  But then he wouldn't be able to try to get one over on JJ, who we all know is Ignorant Of The Modern Ways!

[CrazyInAlabama]

3 p.m. episodes, both reruns, probably 2017-

First-

Debutante Dud-Plaintiff runs a tutoring, debutante non-profit organization, and is suing Capone DeLeon, videographer for doing a bad video and photographer for the debutante ball.  Defendant was paid $500.   There was supposed to be a winter wonderland background on the still photos, and everything else would have the same background added to the video.  Plaintiff told defendant he would make extra money by selling photos to the teens, and their family.    Back drop was purchased by the plaintiff, but too late to arrive.   A green background was used, but it can be altered easily.   There were only four debutantes.   Plaintiff received photos, and video.   There was no written contract, and the defendant fulfilled what was required of him by plaintiff.   Emailed 'contract' doesn't mention back drop, editing of video, or several other things plaintiff wanted, but it was signed electronically by both parties.    Total price was supposed to be $1200, but because of the extra photo purchases by debutantes, photographer discounted the price to $500.  Case dismissed

Cars Held Hostage-Plaintiff suing ex-girlfriend for return of two vehicles, or the costs of them.  Plaintiff claims defendant borrowed money to purchase a car, which she put in her name.    Then defendant took a car into the mechanic for him, and the car has been non operating for two years now, and plaintiff wants something for this one too.   Everything dismissed, because it was all ridiculous.  

Second-

Fishing Frenzy-Plaintiff suing over defendant's charter fishing boat hitting his boat, in the Pacific (it was a big enough ocean for both boats), and damage to plaintiff's boat by defendant's crew.  Defendant chums the water to attract fish for his paying passengers.   Plaintiff tagged along with his personal boat, because he hoped the fish would be plentiful nearby.     There are pictures showing lots of private, and charter boats in the area.    Then, crew used a big lure (looks very heavy), to damage the plaintiff's boat motor cowling (cover).    $1382 is the part for the motor, and paint etc. extra.  $1500 to plaintiff.    

Family Reunion Food Fail-Plaintiff suing caterer over inadequate food for a family reunion.   At the price agreed on, I don't see why plaintiff would expect anything better.   The plaintiff expected the caterer to supply food for several meals, including set up, and clean up, plus plates and such, for 50 people.    There were supposed to be three meals, for 50 each, (breakfast, BBQ, and another meal) totaling 150 meals.    Plaintiff agreed to pay $2500 for this for $16 per person, including food, preparation, silverware, cutlery, set up, clean up, etc.  plus he had an assistant too.    Plaintiff didn't get additional food, but complains the food was store bought, and wasn't everything she wanted prepared.   For $2500 and $16 per person plaintiff wanted fresh fruit salad, deep fried turkeys, etc.    Plaintiff gets nothing, and deserves exactly that.  I can only imagine how much a caterer would charge for the meals the plaintiff wanted, and it wouldn't be $16 a person.  

[CrazyInAlabama]

5 p.m. episodes, first new, second recent rerun-

First (New)-

I'm the World's Nicest Mechanic-Plaintiff was in a severe accident, resulting in a major brain injury.      Plaintiff was paid $1100 for the Hyundai car from the accident, and mechanic fixed that car and returned to the plaintiff.   Honda Element was given to the mechanic, fixed up and resold for $950.    Plaintiff expects sympathy because she spent her insurance claim payment on expenses, instead of the car.   $174 for plaintiff (difference between car insurance payment, and what is owed to fix car).  

Middle School Friends Fallout-(The litigants met in Middle School) Plaintiff suing former roommate for stolen property, unpaid rent.  As always, defendant claims he paid rent a lot more often than plaintiff says he did.  Defendant counter claim for hotel costs, and stolen property.   Plaintiff claims defendant stole and used his credit card, watch, and pistol.    Plaintiff claims to have a recording of defendant admitting thefts, but it died with his previous phone, just like always.  $800 (back rent for two months) for plaintiff.   

Second (Rerun)-

Bakersfield Boyfriend Trouble-Plaintiff wants unpaid rent.   Plaintiff has two trailers/houses on 4 acres near Bakersfield.    Defendants (rented trailer on same property as landlord) claim even though they lived there for several years, that landlord danced around naked in the front yard, harassed the cow-like defendant and daughters, and hated the mother's loser boyfriend.  Defendants were already living there as tenants when plaintiff bought property from 2015 to 2019.     Tenants were mother, three adult daughters, and mother's boyfriend, who also moved in to trailer in  August of 18.    Trouble started in 18 after boyfriend moved in, but police were frequently at the house from mental issues with a daughter.   In October 2018, defendant wanted loser boyfriend out of the trailer/home.    Defendant was going to move out so stopped paying rent.   Two months later tenant moved, boyfriend is now incarcerated.   Back rent is $850.   Plaintiff claims HVAC unit was taken, and trailer was trashed, and ex-tenant is a slob.  Counter claim alleges plaintiff danced naked in the yard, grabbed tenant mother's butt, and hit on adult daughter.    I hope the mother's new landlord watched this.    $1100 to plaintiff, and nothing for defendants. 

Double Lane-Change for a Donut-Plaintiff suing defendant for causing a car accident when defendant cut him off.   Plaintiff says defendant cut across two lanes, and clipped plaintiff's front fender on the driver side.    Defendant says he was trying to get a donut, put the turn signal on, and claims the plaintiff was driving like a nut.     Obviously, the plaintiff is right, and defendant was in a donut frenzy, and did what he had to do to get that donut.   It must have been one hell of a donut.    (My spell check is going nuts about donut, instead of doughnut. It's picking on me).   $1320 to plaintiff for car repairs.  

(Warning, rerun second episode tomorrow is the despicable dog owner who blames the attack on a person in a wheelchair, and the care giver who were across the street, on the disabled person.)

Edited December 8, 2019 by CrazyInAlabama

[Florinaldo]

13 minutes ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

Bakersfield Boyfriend Trouble-

I remembered this one as a prime example of JJ's irritating behaviour. Instead of shooting down the bovine defendant's and daughter's silly acccusations of sexual harrassment and of im prancing naked in the yard, as any reasonable person would have done, she said at least twice "stupid behaviour" adding as an insincere afterthought "if you did it", but so casually it was a clear wink-wink nudge-nudge moment designed to cast aspersions on his character. Which was in keeping with her being hostile to him from the start.

2 hours ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

Debutante Dud

This type of event seems so 1950s, I find it nearly unbelievable that people would give money to that sort of stereotypes-perpetuating "charity".

22 minutes ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

Plaintiff claims to have a recording of defendant admitting thefts, but it died with his previous phone, just like always.

Strange how these young otherwise tech-savvy people can't figure out the need to save their texts and other data when they switch phones, or even just at regular intervals.

[SandyToes]

4 hours ago, Florinaldo said:

4 hours ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

Bakersfield Boyfriend Trouble-

I remembered this one as a prime example of JJ's irritating behaviour. Instead of shooting down the bovine defendant's and daughter's silly acccusations of sexual harrassment and of im prancing naked in the yard, as any reasonable person would have done, she said at least twice "stupid behaviour" adding as an insincere afterthought "if you did it", but so casually it was a clear wink-wink nudge-nudge moment designed to cast aspersions on his character. Which was in keeping with her being hostile to him from the start.

Absotively posilutely.  Can't believe JJ didn't call them out on it more. She kind of hinted that she wasn't going to buy it, but should have reallly hammered them.

4 hours ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

Double Lane-Change for a Donut-Plaintiff suing defendant for causing a car accident when defendant cut him off.   Plaintiff says defendant cut across two lanes, and clipped plaintiff's front fender on the driver side.    Defendant says he was trying to get a donut, put the turn signal on, and claims the plaintiff was driving like a nut.     Obviously, the plaintiff is right, and defendant was in a donut frenzy, and did what he had to do to get that donut.   It must have been one hell of a donut.    (My spell check is going nuts about donut, instead of doughnut. It's picking on me).   $1320 to plaintiff for car repairs.  

I loved the plaintiff in this case.  JJ asked him straight up - "Is it possible the defendant never actually hit your car?"  And he said, "Yes!"  I was concerned JJ would cut him loose after that, but she came through.  Idiot Donut Dude was the cause of the crash, and the damage. Whew!

[CrazyInAlabama]

3 p.m. episodes, both reruns, probably 2016-2017-

First-

Sick Boxer Puppy Scam-Plaintiff puppy buyer suing seller over a sick puppy (puppy survived), and wants vet bills, and cost of puppy ($300).  Plaintiff claims defendant tried to get out of repaying money by faking her own death, and her childrens' deaths. Puppy was only nine weeks, and defendant bought puppy from someone else a week before.   Plaintiff claims puppy had worms, and parvo.  Plaintiff says puppy was sick soon after purchase, and taken to vet a four days after purchase.   Defendant claims puppy had shots (breeder did these), and wormed.    There is no contract or guarantee, stating shot history, health records, etc.       Defendant also claims plaintiff wanted almost $2,000 for vet bills.    Case dismissed.  

Baby caught in the Middle-Plaintiff suing defendant /ex-fiance for return of wedding ring set, a tablet.   Rings are returned in court.    Plaintiff also wants credit card charges made by defendant on his card returned (that's not happening).    Defendant also is restricting the visitation of plaintiff with their child, because she dislikes the plaintiff, but JJ lacks jurisdiction in visitation.    Both litigants keep chiming in, and I hope their cases are dismissed, and booted.   Tablet and rings returned to plaintiff, so his case is over.   Defendant gets her dining room table, and some mirrors from plaintiff, and with an escort.  This stupid case is now over.    

Second-

Annulled and Angry-Plaintiff suing defendant over car purchase.   Litigants had their marriage annulled, and plaintiff says it's because defendant hid that she was mentally unbalanced (in my opinion, they're both nuts).   They married were together for three months, split, went back to living together in a rental house.   Then plaintiff bought old Mustang for defendant (while they were married), and rental house lease was during marriage also.   The papers JJ receives are to have defendant removed from the rental apartment/house, so defendant doesn't owe rent.    Everything goes back to the annulment papers, and the lack of property demands by either litigant.   Case dismissed. 

Marijuana Insult-Plaintiff (landlord) bought house with defendants already as tenants (they lived there for four years total).    Lease became month to month, and tenants stayed into the second month after lease term expired.    Plaintiff claims police came and removed a lot of drug paraphernalia from the tenants' apartment.   Tenants were up to date on rent, because security was used for that.      Police report about drug paraphernalia found in the apartment, and because of Pennsylvania law, landlord couldn't remove the left behind furniture, and stuff tenant left major amounts of furniture.   So landlord couldn't rent apartment for an extra month.   Case dismissed.    

[CrazyInAlabama]

5 p.m. episodes, first new, second rerun-

First-

Hothead Landlord Caught on Tape-Plaintiff/ former tenant claims landlord/defendant  illegally evicted him, and kept his property, plaintiff wants security, and property costs.    Tenant was renting a bedroom, in a four bedroom house.   Police came to talk to tenant, and detained him for 36 hours, no charges were filed, and tenant claims key pad was locked when he returned home.  After police detained tenant he was packing up to move out,   Defendant says guests weren't allowed, but that's not in the lease.   Plaintiff is upset that police were allowed into the house.  Defendant finally filed for eviction of tenant.   There is a video of defendant slamming door on plaintiff, and telling him to get out of the house.     

Each litigant blames the other for the destruction of a door.   Plaintiff $500 (prorated rent, and security).  

Courts Don't Help People Break the Law-Plaintiff suing father for return of money plaintiff paid for a car.   Plaintiff doesn't have a driver's license, it was taken away.  So plaintiff bought a car, put it in father's name, and she was driving car.   Plaintiff was caught behind the wheel of the car, and car was impounded.    Plaintiff wants the money she paid for the car, impound fees, and other things she's not getting.   Plaintiff claims father was supposed to drive her, and her children around in the car.   However, when the police caught woman, she was behind the wheel.    Case dismissed.  

Second-

Wailing from Disabled Ignites Dog to Attack?-Plaintiff was assisting disabled patient on the roadside, past the defendant's driveway.  When defendant's gate opened,  her German Shepherd (GSD)  dogs attacked the patient, and the caregiver.    Defendant blames the disabled patient for their vocalizations infuriating the dog, and causing the attack.   Defendant claims her dogs didn't hurt the plaintiff, or her client.   Plaintiff was bitten on the thigh, and says defendant told her, and client to shut up, and defendant said they weren't hurt.   Medical records say dog bite wound on the thigh.   Despicable defendant claims plaintiff is a fraud, and blamed the bite (if it happened) on the disabled client's noise.  Defendant wanted plaintiff and client to go into her house, and plaintiff refused.   Plaintiff would have been a fool to go into that woman's house.    Animal control reports were done.    Defendant claims plaintiff, and client were on her property.    

$3,000 for plaintiff.  

I Didn't Go to Law school for $38 in Dirt-Plaintiff suing ex-boyfriend for a loan ($800), planter material (yes, dirt for planting), and storage fees.    As usual, defendant claims the $800 was a gift.    JJ is not dealing with potting soil.    $800 back to plaintiff, and that's it.   

Edited December 6, 2019 by CrazyInAlabama

[SRTouch]

On 12/3/2019 at 5:59 PM, CrazyInAlabama said:

5 p.m. episodes, first new, second recent rerun-

First (New)-I'm the World's Nicest Mechanic-Plaintiff was in a severe accident, resulting in a major brain injury.      Plaintiff was paid $1100 for the Hyundai car from the accident, and mechanic fixed that car and returned to the plaintiff.   Honda Element was given to the mechanic, fixed up and resold for $950.    Plaintiff expects sympathy because she spent her insurance claim payment on expenses, instead of the car.   $174 for plaintiff (difference between car insurance payment, and what is owed to fix car).

Once again JJ decides case based on her expert knowledge of mechanical issues. Not for the first time, she rules based on her flawed idea of what a professional mechanic does with absolutely no evidence. Truth is I hit FF when she started asking how much it cost mechanic for the valve cover gasket as if the cost of the part should be the sum total of what mechanic's work is worth..... not sure what mechanic said that part of job was worth, but quick Google search shows average cost would be close to $150, while gasket under 10 bucks - just before the gadkrt she dismisses mechanic trying to explain inspecting, cleaning and reinstalling spark plugs out of hand - JJ, you can tell a lot about how the car is running by pulling the plugs and inspecting them, that's how old time mechanics diagnosed many problems before cars became rolling computers, and if plugs were fouled and only hand tight as D said then simply cleaning and properly installing them could cause major improvement in how car runs, even though it only takes a few minute...... despite JJ casual dismissal and steam rolling over the mechanic, his knowledge, expertise and time are worth something - and without plaintiff bringing an actual expert witness, I'll go with the professional who knows something about the job instead of JJ opinion formed with no mechanical knowledge..... oh well, as we already knew, litigants should never let JJ decide mechanical cases - or cases involving firearms - or a case when litigant had a pit bull - or antique/classic cars, or collectibles - or physics of accident reconstruction - or - well I could go on all day....... sometimes I get hint that a ruling is based on knowledge not shared with viewers, often it's obvious she just has no idea how 99.999% of the the world operates

[bad things are bad]

Quote

Truth is I hit FF when she started asking how much it cost mechanic for the valve cover gasket as if the cost of the part should be the sum total of what mechanic's work is worth.

Yeah, that was STUPID. Many cars (don't know about this one in particular) require a lot of parts to be removed before you can get to a valve cover gasket. The cost of the gasket was trivial, labor hours at about $90/hour are where the money is. 

JJ should get a Motor or Mitchell flat rate manual to go with her Blue Books. Byrd could look up labor times in it. 

[CrazyInAlabama]

3 p.m. episodes, both reruns, probably 2016-2017-

First-

Arrest Him for Fraud- Plaintiff suing defendant for repayment of money ($5400) paid to defendant to buy him a truck.  Defendant buys vehicle for people.   Plaintiff's witness is another victim of defendant's car buying scheme.    Defendant never found a truck for the plaintiff, but didn't repay the $5,400.    Defendant offered his truck to plaintiff for the money, but there was a $4,000 title loan on the truck, so it couldn't be registered.  (A Title Max lien is $10 a day interest = $300 a month).   JJ will sent TItleMax the check for the lien, and plaintiff will get a free and clear title.   Then $1400 left goes to the plaintiff's witness, who was also scammed.  For some reason D.A. and police refuse to do something about this fraudster.   

Pay Me Back Auntie-Plaintiff suing his Aunt/defendant for giving her a home, health care (Care credit charges), and a car demand payback.    Aunt was going to be homeless, and aunt moved in with son, into plaintiff's house for $500 a month (plaintiff wife has fluorescent purple hair, and a red sweater, my eyes are hurting from the clashing colors).   Defendant used over $705 on Care credit from plaintiff, and repaid some, but still owes $695.   Plaintiff leased a car, and loaned it to defendant, and defendant was supposed to get a loan for car, but never did.   Tolls were on leased car, $280.   $973 total so far. 

Second-

Brother vs. Sister-Plaintiff says she sold non-running car to brother for $500, and brother didn't pay her for car.  Brother said car was gift, got car running, and sold it., and sister now wants $500 for the car.  Plaintiff claims 1991 car was worth $1300, on KBB; and car was originally brother's for $1300, and he gave it to sister.   Plaintiff had a bunch of tickets on car, since it was at brother's house, but still registered in plaintiff's name.   The tickets were because registration expired four months before plaintiff gave car to defendant.   Plaintiff case dismissed, because it's ridiculous. 

A House Divided-Plaintiff/father suing his son for substandard and unfinished work on father's house.    Plaintiff paid $1800 to another company to fix water leak, and claims there was additional damage from son's negligence.    Plaintiff gets nothing, because he deserves nothing.   

[seacliffsal]

I really need to thank everyone for the wonderful summaries of the cases these last few days as my channel has decided to show the impeachment process rather than Judge Judy.  And, I would prefer to watch Judge Judy after working all day.  One of the days, the channel started an episode (I was so happy) and then cut away after about 10 minutes.  Sigh.

At least I feel a bit "caught up" due to your wonderful commentary.  I only record new episodes so I know that unless I just happen to be watching, I won't be able to catch up on these lost episodes.

As an aside-is there any way to get rid of the continual ads at the bottom of the page?  I know primetimer is a business, but the ads impact how much I can read without having to continually scroll.

[CrazyInAlabama]

5 p.m. episodes, first new, second a recent rerun-

First-

Aussiedoodle Visitation Battle-Plaintiff says he only agreed to sell puppy to defendant if his family had the right to visitation (he's suing for $3600).   Plaintiff bought puppy from some pet store, for $1200, and had dog for 3 months.   Defendant says dog was neglected, and she immediately took the dog to the vet.   Plaintiff offered dog for $750, but paid him only $350, and puppy was outside in a shed, when it was 96 degrees.    Vet said dog was matted (hair coat mats had to be professionally removed, and can be very painful and damaging to the dog skin).   Sales picture with ad of puppy are awful, with matted coat, and puppy was outside on heavy chain.   Defendant offered $500, and didn't pay, but JJ pays the loser plaintiff the money.     

Violent Lesbian Temper Tantrum-Plaintiff suing ex-girlfriend for destroying her clothes and furniture, and an assault.   The litigants dated for a while, but then were just roommates, and lived together.  However, the clothes destruction happened a year ago, and the litigants still lived together after this.  

Second-

The $18,000 Signature-Plaintiff and long divorced husband negotiated over an insurance policy, to terminate it.  Defendant (who is an insurance agent), offered $18,000 for the spousal release for the insurance policy.   Then, plaintiff signed the spousal release, in return for $18,000.   Defendant only sent $12,000.  Defendant tried to alter the agreement after it was fully executed.    I can certainly see why they're divorced, and why the plaintiff didn't just sign the spousal release for free.    Plaintiff receives $5,000.      

Teen Test Drive Disaster-Plaintiff and son are suing former friend, for tow and impound fees, and for crashing a mustang (2001 Mustang Coupe) the son drove.    Defendant was planning on buying the car, took it for a test drive, was thinking about buying the car, and had an accident.  Defendant couldn't pay for car yet, because he had tickets, and court bills to pay.   Car was towed, and impounded.    Plaintiff father, car owner, didn't contact the tow company after the accident,   $239 to plaintiff

[CrazyInAlabama]

3 p.m. episodes, probably reruns from 2016-2017-

First-

I Love You, but I Don't Owe You-Plaintiff suing defendant/former friend over unpaid loans.   Defendant has the most facial tattoos and piercings I've seen in a long time, and her teenage daughter (named Seven) is following in her tattooed footsteps. .   Plaintiff claims she loaned defendant $2000 , until defendant's SSI started, with back payments.  Defendant says she was homeless.  Defendant also has a Legal Aid lawyer now, and had a public defender before for other previous cases.  Plaintiff claims she paid over $1300+ for InTown Suites after eviction, plus $1099 to another hotel, and $1440 for Sunrise Apartments.    Defendant claims she repaid the $1300 in cash when settlement came in.  $4580 to plaintiff. 

33 Year-Old RV Bust-Plaintiff paid $2500 for a 33 year-old RV, and purchased vehicle, and drove it 15 miles home, after a mechanic's inspection.    Plaintiff said RV engine blew, burned him, and he wants his money back, plus payment for his burns.   Apparently, plaintiff can't understand 33 years-old, As Is, or anything about buying used vehicles.   Case dismissed, because plaintiff is ridiculous. 

Second-

Twice Divorced to the Same Man (Shouldn't it be "from" instead of "to"?)-Plaintiff married, and divorced defendant.   They were still living together after the second divorce, but just as landlord/tenant.  Plaintiff wants property damage, money for a truck.     The former couple lived together for a year, and she finally moved out.   Then plaintiff sold a truck to defendant, but agreed to wait for a tax refund.   Then plaintiff received a settlement (with a NDA attached), and she purchased sugar gliders (animals, cute but expensive) for ex, and their child.   Then, he broke her phone after an argument.       Plaintiff loaned $2900 to defendant, and $1500 for a truck was loaned.    Since litigants were living together, the disability payments were going to be stopped, so she moved out to still get payments.   Defendant has a counter claim for 9 months rent.  Case dismissed.  

Roommates No More-Plaintiff suing ex-roommate for  deposit, and rent paid.   Plaintiff rented room in house, house was sold, and defendant was buying house, and renting rooms.   Plaintiff gave defendant $100 deposit, because plaintiff didn't move into that room, and defendant later told plaintiff he wasn't going to rent to him.     $100 back to plaintiff.  Since defendant doesn't want a roommate, ever, $500 to plaintiff. 

[CrazyInAlabama]

5 p.m. episodes, first one new, second one a recent rerun-

First (New)-

Police Escort Drunk Vandal-Plaintiff claims defendant/ former roommate smashed his two TVs, stole his sneakers and his wallet.    The two men had a verbal and physical argument, about rent, and other issues.      Defendant claims plaintiff shoved him into the plaintiff's wall mounted TV, and it smashed.    Defendant went outside to leave, wanted his property back, so called the police for an escort.   Defendant, and police escort entered the apartment, and he retrieved is property.  Litigants are told to retrieve a copy of the police report.  Plaintiff claims his wall-mounted TV was smashed also.   No police reports were done.  Sadly, defendant's old phone had the texts from plaintiff on it, but that phone had the inevitable accident that all phones on this show have, right before the court case is filmed.   Defendant claims the sneakers and keys were given by his sister to the plaintiff. $500 to plaintiff, and this totally boring case is finally over. 

Phone-Breaking Party-Plaintiff suing ex-friend for breaking his iPhone (why is it always an iPhone?).    They were horsing around at a party, and plaintiff claims defendant broke his phone.  Case dismissed.    

Second (Rerun)-

Classic Mercedes Mayhem-Plaintiff suing former business partner for the return of two Mercedes.   The Mercedes are 1999 ($2800), and 2000 ($ ), cars were running, but no longer are..  Cars are no longer insured, or registered, but plaintiff has the titles.  Defendant is a mechanic.    Mechanic never fixed either car.  Plaintiff receives no money, but gets both cars back.   Plaintiff whines about having to go to Georgia and pick cars up, when he lives in Utah.    

Catfight Over Cheap Wine-Plaintiff suing former friend over damages, rent, and property after a fight.  They were fighting over a $3.00 bottle of wine, and who drank too much wine.   Then the two women started fighting, it turned physical.    Defendant claims plaintiff ripped her hair out by the roots, and it hasn't grown back. Plaintiff moved out, and defendant was evicted for non-payment.    Plaintiff claims defendant sold her property on a web site.   

The fight happened the beginning of December, but didn't see a doctor until March about her hair not growing back.     Doctor's treatment was Amoxicillin, (for hair loss?).

Plaintiff receives $1,037, defendant gets nothing, and deserves even less than that.

[parrotfeathers]

Is Judge Judy getting meaner or is it just me?  She's hardy ever pleasant to anyone anymore.

Why can't the litigants take their papers with them when they leave the courtroom?

[SandyToes]

2 hours ago, parrotfeathers said:

Why can't the litigants take their papers with them when they leave the courtroom?

My guess is they shoot the footage of JJ holding and reading the docs after the episode is filmed.  They often highlight things, that aren't highlighted on the documents.  Just my theory.

Edited December 7, 2019 by SandyToes

[Florinaldo]

3 hours ago, parrotfeathers said:

Is Judge Judy getting meaner or is it just me?  She's hardy ever pleasant to anyone anymore.

Why can't the litigants take their papers with them when they leave the courtroom?

Perhaps the producers feel that the crabbier she is, the more viewers will tune in for the spectacle. Especially since so many cases are very repetitive.

As for the papers, i thought they kept them to make copies and make sure they have a complete file on the cases. But as @SandyToes suggests, it may be also be to do pick-up shots of the documents to insert when JJ is supposed to be reading them. I don't think they have a permanent camera at the back shooting over her shoulders and there are at times discrepancies in what is highlighted between a long shot and a close-up of the papers.

[parrotfeathers]

4 hours ago, SandyToes said:

My guess is they shoot the footage of JJ holding and reading the docs after the episode is filmed.  They often highlight things, that aren't highlighted on the documents.  Just my theory.

That makes sense.  Thanks.

[configdotsys]

On 11/20/2019 at 12:54 PM, CrazyInAlabama said:

The witness in the vandals case also said something interesting, she said between the first time she caught them destroying the shop, and trying to steal the car, she said the one kid (the now blonde one) had red hair.   Then it court it was back to blonde, bet one or both of the mothers thought they could claim their kid had blonde hair, so it was a lie that their kid did it.   The dark haired mother was the typical criminal mother, deny everything, claim the proof is fabricated, and gives her kid an alibi, it's the same thing she'll be doing at his murder trial in 10 years.   

The red hair was that canned spray stuff that didn't cover his whole head. You could tell in the picture they showed. I know we're not supposed to write "children" off but sorry, if I lived near any of these thugs I'd be on my way out of the neighborhood stat. They started a motorcycle and a car and were planning to take the car? They threw a blowtorch in the trunk? And the dolt blond mother at the end said there was no proof that it was them?

The one that wanted to talk-- as soon as he opened his mouth on the stand-- sounded like a total punk criminal in training. You are totally right that mom will be claiming that he didn't do it no matter what charges he's brought up on and no matter how many witnesses, pictures and videos they have. It was interesting how they kept putting the camera on them. The blonde boy said to the other one after he testified "Good job," and slapped him five. The yawning, the conversations they were having should have been stopped. What happened to decorum in court? These punks ran the show. Their behavior should have resulted in a stern comment from JJ. Perhaps it did but was not aired but then it doesn't matter as we are comment on what we are actually seeing, not what we guess might have happened.

I think JJ knew the parents, especially the one with the dark hair, were lost causes. These two will be in juvie in no time at all. It was weird to hear JJ say something like "I don't want to say something contrary to his mother" or something when in the past she has tore parents a new one with the kids sitting right there.  If anyone needed the "If you stick up for him now, this is not going to be your last time court with him" talk, it was these morons.

[CrazyInAlabama]

3 p.m. episodes, both reruns, probably 2016-2017-

First-

Uber Accident Victim-Plaintiff (Uber driver) was making a left turn, and defendant backed out of his driveway, and backed into plaintiff.    Unfortunately, defendant has no license, registration, or insurance, because he just bought the car the day before.   He was driving his child to school (and probably everywhere else too).   Defendant claims he was going to drop his child at school, then register and insure the car.    Defendant promised to pay for the accident, and he would pay plaintiff when his $9,000+ school funds came in (Byrd should have mailed defendant the check faster).    Plaintiff's Uber insurance paid, except for the $1,000 deductible, so she gets $1,000 from JJ., plus a week of lost Uber wages, and car rental, $767.   Plaintiff gets $2500.  

Divorce Debit Drama-Plaintiff suing ex-wife for fraudulent use of his health care debit card for one of their common children.   The debit card was tied to an HSA for medical, dental etc, but only for medical treatment.    Plaintiff says defendant used the HSA debit card for the 27 year old daughter, not the 17 year old child.    27 year old daughter is defendant's witness, and says father said she could use the card for over $500 in lab tests, plaintiff denies this.    JJ insists that the 27 year old daughter is who the plaintiff should sue, and I sadly agree, or else he should pay the bill himself if he refuses to sue the daughter.      However, I suspect the mother (defendant) did give the information to the older daughter.    Case dismissed.  (I know someone who tried to use a family members insurance like this, and not only was it denied, but that person wasn't allowed to get on the company plan for a year as a penalty, for health care fraud).    

Bongs and Pipes...Oh My-Plaintiff landlord suing former tenant for damages (It's a historic Hollywood building, and defendant lived there for four or five years).   The $5500 security deposit wasn't returned.  ($3281 was rent!), and tenant didn't pay the last two months rent.  JJ doesn't like the bills presented, and photos by landlord.   Between unpaid rent, and broken floor tile, the $5500 security is used up.    Landlord keeps the $5500, and that's it (I totally believe the former tenant was responsible for the bongs, and paraphernalia left behind, and broken door).  

Second-

Sick Child Fundraising Frenzy-Plaintiff suing defendant because he pulled out of plaintiff's charity event.   However, defendant accepted $1600 from plaintiff's assistant.     Plaintiff had a cousin's child diagnosed with a severe illness, so she decided to raise funds for living expenses for the parents, and medical bills.     Plaintiff decided to have a motorcycle ride, with proceeds going to the cousin's family.   Other family members did a Bowl-a-thon, and the child's father started a GoFundMe, plus plaintiff did another GoFundMe, and there was a third GoFundMe, and another one or two GFM's.      Defendant agreed to help do the motorcycle event, but he arranged the venue, the date and such, and then he was suspicious about the event, and he pulled out.    Plaintiff claims she gave GFM money from her fund, and gave it to defendant ($1,000).    

Defendant pulled out of the motorcycle ride, a week prior to the event because of doubts he had with the legitimacy of the charity.     Plaintiff says the ride raised just under $10,000,  and they cleared $8500.     The child's father was given the $8500 the day of the event.  (Plaintiff is the one who calls it Me Me, instead of meme).     I don't like the defendant, but I totally don't believe, or like the plaintiff.   

Plaintiff receives $1600, but payable to the child's parents. 

[CrazyInAlabama]

5 p.m. episodes, first new, second rerun-

First (New)-

Baby Pepper-Sprayed During Fight-Plaintiff suing defendant who plaintiff claims was breaking into her house.    Defendant pepper sprayed plaintiff, and the baby inside plaintiff's house.  (Defendant explains to JJ that they had an 'altercation', not a 'fight').    Plaintiff and defendant were both arrested, but charges were dismissed.  Protective order requests for both sides were dismissed.   There was a mediation over this, which didn't work.   Then at a subsequent court hearing with testimony about orders of protection, and both requests were dismissed.   JJ isn't going to hear that part again, just the baby that was pepper-sprayed (or maced).   

$2645 are the medical bills for the pepper spray on the baby, after a previous fight over children fighting at earlier in the day.   Defendant claims plaintiff's mother wasn't holding the baby when she zapped her, but blames the plaintiff's mother, and claims plaintiff mother broke her own window.    Medical records say see the doctor the next day, but plaintiff says baby doesn't have a doctor, and has no insurance.   Defendant's story is total bull stuff, and defendant is despicable.    Plaintiff receives $2645 for medical bills.  (Another case where someone should move).  

Oops!   Sorry About that Shotgun Blast to Your Ceiling-Plaintiff heard a burglar, fired a shotgun into the ceiling, police were called, and now ex-girlfriend won't return his appliances, and furniture.   Plaintiff was arrested, and spent 75 days in jail.    By the time plaintiff was out of jail, apartment was gone.    Six months later he called defendant, and asked where his apartment contents were, that defendant retrieved.   Defendant has living room set, dinette set, and it's at her father's apartment where she lives.   $9000 was plaintiff's disability settlement.     Defendant was denied for disability, then reapplied with the help of a lawyer, $2500 was her settlement for back payments, then the disability started.   If she has so much money, defendant should get that awful hair fixed, and eyebrows fixed.   Plaintiff gets his furniture back, with the help of a Marshal, and then defendant will get her appearance fee. 

Second (Rerun)-

Teen Stupidity Causes Bodily Injury-Plaintiff's car was at defendant's house (they're cousins), defendant drove the plaintiff's car.   Accident injured the boyfriend passenger who was in the hospital for two weeks, and rehab for two months, and is still there.    Plaintiff's car was totaled.      Defendant has no license (she failed the test once, and didn't try again)., no insurance, as usual.  Defendant's mother looks like we're having a cocktail party in court.    $3478 to plaintiff (no defendant idiot driver, no license means insurance won't cover you). 

  The Bee's Knees-Plaintiffs suing former roommates for security, first month, property damages, and utilities.    Why is it always a Play Station?   $318 to plaintiff.   

Black Friday BB Gun Deal-Plaintiff suing defendant/niece over unpaid loan, credit card balance, and moving costs/storage costs ($2294).   Defendant's children are in custody of the plaintiff's sister (defendant's mother) , and defendant moved into plaintiff's house.   It scares me to admit, the defendant is a nurse.   Defendant claims she paid back $150, for the BB guns for the children (13, 11, 8, and ?), and were to stay at aunt's/defendant's house.    Defendant still can't have her children at her own apartment she has now.    I remember this one, defendant supposedly had a job starting at Victoria's Secret, and had to have clothing from there to wear to work, and aunt's credit card was used several other times.   There is no way on Earth the defendant would fit anything at VS, and I hope there's no picture of her trying to wear items from there.     $1665 is the credit card charge total.  Defendant moved out, and plaintiff told defendant she was putting her items in a storage unit.   Defendant was coming in at night, setting off the alarm, only coming home briefly, so plaintiff told her that free rent was done, and she was putting her remaining items in storage.    Defendant was notified about the storage date, and defendant also picked up her stuff.   $1994 to plaintiff. 

Edited December 10, 2019 by CrazyInAlabama

[khyber]

I don't understand why the baby, and probably his mother, don't have medical insurance. With the ACA, if you're poor, the coverage is subsidized. 

[Florinaldo]

16 hours ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

Baby Pepper-Sprayed During Fight

JJ said during this case that women are usually the well-behaved ones in society, aiming for peace and tranquility, whereas males are ill-formed savages.

Has she even been listening to the cases featured on her show over the past few years? Didn't she notice the endless parade of female furies who go after each other tooth and nail (literally) at the slightest prextet, be it over a useless womanizing mate, bad hair extensions, a cheap bottle of wine or a "disrepectful" look.

Of course, this was just another opportunity for her to engage in her frequent hobby, the last socially accceptable form of sexism, aimed at men in general.

16 hours ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

Oops!   Sorry About that Shotgun Blast to Your Ceiling

Who the hell thinks it is acceptable (not to mention safe) to fire a shotgun at the ceiling (or in any direction) in an multi-unit apartment complex? The defendant was an opportunistic grifter, but the plaintiff is a dangerous idiot.

[CrazyInAlabama]

3 p.m. episodes, both reruns, probably 2016-2017-

First-

Gardener Attacked by Tree Owner-Plaintiff (tree owner) suing neighbors and their gardener for cutting branches from plaintiff's tree, that overhang the defendant's pool.    Gardener cut branches on defendant's side.   Since the tree overhangs defendant's property, then they don't need permission, but defendant's mother talked to the plaintiff's wife about it.   (From photos, tree looks dead, everything around it has leaves).  Plaintiff claims when he came on defendant's property, that the gardener hit him several times.   Plaintiff claims gardener had a back mounted leaf blower going, and turned around and hit him with a rake.  There is no medical or police reports.    Police declined to charge gardener.       

I can't imagine living next to the blow hard defendant for 25 years.    Gardener was standing on defendant's shed when the branches were cut on defendants' side of the property line.   Defendants and gardener have cut branches other years (gardener has been trimming tree for five years, but has been defendant's gardener for 20 years), but plaintiff didn't notice I guess.  Gardener says plaintiff hit him, not the other way around.   This is the plaintiff who said he's a black belt, and if he had hit the gardener, he'd be dead.    

Second-

Landlord Lease Breakers-Plaintiffs were renting a house to defendants, but told them to move out in mid-March, but their lease didn't run out until mid-June.    A five day notice to move was filed because of a utility bill.    Plaintiff wanted to sell the house, and wanted defendants out, and they moved in mid-April.    There are no bills for clean up of the house, and keep the security deposit.   Tenants wanted to clean up, but plaintiffs told then to leave, and not come back.   Plaintiffs didn't sell, and woman moved back into the house themselves, and still live there.     Plaintiffs get their washer/dryer back, but get nothing else. 

Drinking and Car Totaling-Plaintiff suing former roommate for crashing his car, and defendant had been drinking.     Defendant agreed to pay $1,000 deductible to plaintiff, and claims he did, plaintiff claims he wasn't paid.     Plaintiff car was repaired, but on a test drive the transmission failed.    Plaintiff is told to go back to Minnesota, and refile locally, and bring an expert witness.   

[CrazyInAlabama]

5 p.m. episodes, first one new, second one rerun-

First (New)-

Hormone Balancing Out of Business-Plaintiff/former business owner, suing defendant for non-payment when plaintiff sublet to defendant.   Business was an all natural hormone balancing company, and sold furnishing, etc. to defendant, and had 3 1/2 years left on lease.   Defendant was opening a beauty spa.    Plaintiff went out of business after 1 1/2 years, and sublet to defendant, then defendant went out of business.   There is also no written consent from premises owner to sublet to defendant, so it was an illegal sublet.   Original lease plaintiff signed says no sublet without permission.   

Defendant signed a lease with the landlord, but it was for a separate space in the same complex.   Plaintiff loses deposit on the business space, because subletting was illegal.  Plaintiff wants money for furniture, and items she sold to defendant.   The landlord sold some of the items to others, so that's off the tab.    Furnishings were only $500, but defendant paid $900 to plaintiff already, so that's dismissed.   Defendant is counter suing for fraud.   Defendant claims landlord told her she had to leave all property behind when she went out of business, and that plaintiff lied and said defendant never paid for any furniture.  There is a text from defendant saying she's leaving furniture to landlord to get out of the lease.     Everything is dismissed.

Wedding Photographer Thief Caught on Tape-Plaintiffs are suing their wedding photographer for destroying their wedding video, after he stole the videographer's camera.  The plaintiffs are suing for stolen memories, a first for me to hear about.    There is video showing the photographer stealing the video camera, and later photographer 'found' it, and claims it was a mistake. (No, getting caught on film stealing was the mistake).   You can see the video camera sticking out behind the pillar, but then the camera disappears into the photographer's bag.   

 There are a lot of photos of the wedding ,but the video was taped over by the thief.    Plaintiffs receive what they ask for.  

Second (Rerun)-

Hennessey Fueled Catfight-Plaintiff suing defendant for breaking a wall mirror, couch, and other items when they had a fist fight in plaintiff's house.    Plaintiff came home, found ex-friend defendant in plaintiff's home with her cousin.   The fight started when plaintiff told her to leave.       I wonder if the missing teeth on defendant were from the fight?   Defendant claims plaintiff smacked her phone out of her hand, and plaintiff threw phone in toilet, and the big fight started.   Plaintiff's witness claims defendant threw the phone out the door, and phone broke.    Plaintiff claims defendant smashed the couch, all of the fighting started,  Case dismissed.    I do wish we had a video of the fight.  

Homeless Man Home Invasion-Plaintiff suing ex-boyfriend for breaking her bedroom window, stealing her TV, and damages.    The rented room was in defendant's father's home, and they broke up over a year ago.       Defendant was living in his car, and needed gas money.    Defendant owned TV, but had it given to plaintiff by a neighbor to hold.  Defendant claims plaintiff was to hold the TV for him.   The TV is so old it's worthless.       Defendant claims he didn't break into the house, but the front door was open.     Pictures of window show the glass is broken.     $160 for window to plaintiff.   

[basiltherat]

Today, we had two "businesswomen" where the Plaintiff was suing the Defendant for rent on a sublease of a business place.  It turns out in this case (as you could see coming a mile away) that subletting was not permitted in the original lease, so once again, the hands, they are dirty.

Both businesses failed (shocking, I know) after less than two years.  We can guess why because neither business person kept very clear records and stuff was coming in on text messages and "sticky notes" and, of course, what the infamous Landlord Smith "told" them.  

Folks, maybe the reasons why your businesses failed is that you are not very good at business practices, like due diligence and getting things IN WRITING!!!  And I believe that Landlord Smith knew this.

[Guest]

I will not touch anyone’s phone because of germs and certainly would never entertain the thought of handling one that was dropped in a toilet 

Totally surprised that JJ was so willing to paw said phone. She really needs to have a box of surgical gloves handy just like JM 

Edited December 11, 2019 by PsychoKlown

[CrazyInAlabama]

3 p.m episodes, both reruns, probably 2016 or so-

First-

Social Security Fraud?-Plaintiff suing defendant for failing to build a website for his business (sportswearalley was the website), to sell shirts, and other items for sports teams.  It took five months to get the team jerseys loaded, but the payment method and prices were never given by the plaintiff.   Defendant says plaintiff wanted the business to be low key, so it wouldn't interfere with his Social Security Disability.   Defendant also says web site for t-shirt business needed information that plaintiff refused to give him.    Plaintiff wants almost $4k.  Deposit was $1800 to defendant.   Did I hear correctly that plaintiff has been on disability for 4 to 5 years? or 45 years?    Plaintiff also didn't get a payment method, corporate filing with the state, tax numbers, jersey descriptions, and didn't register the company name, and buy a domain.   (By the way the website is for sale for almost $9k now, so I guess this never was resolved).   Plaintiff swears defendant was going to negotiate with suppliers in China for NFL jerseys, not right (Jerseys in China are not legit, and are counterfeit).   Defendant says he never said anything about getting jersey's for the plaintiff.  Case dismissed, filed too early pending plaintiff actions

Ex-Lovers Break It Down-Plaintiff and ex-live in suing for tablet, unpaid rent, and hotel costs.   Defendant says plaintiff and child moved in with him at his place, and she barely paid rent.  He got sick of this, and asked woman and her child (apparently more than one child now) to leave.    Plaintiff wants her rent back, but there's no proof she paid rent.   Defendant claims woman lived there for three or four months, and didn't pay her $200 a month rent.  Case dismissed.     

Second-

Third Roommate Roulette-Plaintiff suing former roommate, for damages, unpaid rent (he claims he paid), and renter's insurance deductible.   It took plaintiff a year to get to court.  Plaintiff let defendant move in without paying deposit and rent at move-in.   Defendant claims he paid $1,000 security deposit, and it was taken for the last months rent, Defendant picked the wrong place to move into, there are a lot of unenforceable items in the 'co-tenancy agreement' that all roommates signed.   Plaintiff claims defendant broke the garage window to get his furniture out when he moved out.    A week after move out defendant realized he had some of plaintiff's belongings (ski equipment), and he notified her, and asked to arrange pick up.  Defendant still has the disputed ski equipment, and plaintiff claimed on her insurance policy.   JJ says plaintiff gets her equipment back, but has to reimburse the insurance company for the insurance claim.   Case dismissed.  

Auction Angst-Plaintiff suing former friend, for the cost of a car she bought at auction on his behalf.    Plaintiff has an auction card, so she can bid.   Defendant wanted a car for his son, and plaintiff went to auction with him, to purchase the car.    Plaintiff bought a 2002 BMW X-5, for $3100.    At this auction you can look at the cars, and actually drive them, and plaintiff claims defendant wanted her to bid on cars they hadn't inspected or previewed.   After plaintiff bought the BMW, the defendant refused to pay for it.   At lunch, after the auction the defendant said he wouldn't pay for the car, so plaintiff told defendant they would resell the car. and when car broke down on the way home, it was towed to defendant's mechanic where it remains.   Plaintiff gets the car cost of $3500, plus auction fees. 

Edited December 11, 2019 by CrazyInAlabama

[CrazyInAlabama]

5 p.m. episodes, first one new, second one rerun-

First (New)-

Dating Roommate Roulette-Two male former roommates are suing woman defendant.   Woman defendant moved out two months early, to her boyfriend's home, and she was pregnant then also (A Maury show is in her future).  Woman dated, or hooked up with both roommates at different times.    Defendant claims she moved out because of harassment.  Defendant claims after she moved out (three months early), that her property was messed up, and she thinks men went through her stuff.    Plaintiffs get $1,000.

(So if I understood the case right, the defendant was occasionally hooking up with one or both roommates, and the boyfriend? Ick!) 

8 Year Old Maniac Driver-Plaintiffs suing neighbor parents over defendant's 8 year old driving a golf cart, smashed into their aluminum shed.   Kid was driving neighbor's golf cart, with her permission, and he smashed into the shed, and destroyed it.    Defendant was sitting next to the kid during the wild ride.    Plaintiffs say when they came home the child's mother was in their back yard at the shed with a flashlight.   The shed was very old, and JJ won't give them full value, but I think they should get every penny.    $1760 to the plaintiffs.

(In the hall-terview defendant says the plaintiffs are mean to her.)  

My Daughter the Window Breaker-Plaintiff suing daughter for breaking her house windows.   Defendant daughter was living with the mother, and the rental house was going to be sold, so everyone had to move within a few months.    Plaintiff says daughter was drinking, and smashed house windows.  Police told daughter to leave.   Daughter moved back with her sister after this, and claims mother kept a lot of her property, and wouldn't let her get it.     Mother had some stuff moved to storage, but had to leave some items behind, and doesn't know if daughter has some possessions stored.    Defendant claims mother withdrew $100 from the government card, no proof.    $638 to plaintiff. 

Second (Rerun)-

Remodel Slander-Plaintiff suing defendant contractor for shoddy work on a bathroom remodel.  However, plaintiff admits she hired the cheapest contractor she could find,  Plaintiff paid him $2400, and she now wants $5,000 to fix the bathroom.   As usual, no contract.     Defendant did bad work, but it's not unusable.     Plaintiff gets $300.   

 Privacy Invasion-Plaintiff suing her former landlady for evicting her.  Plaintiff was renting room in defendant's house.  Security was $500, and rent was $1,000.   Defendant has had tenants for 13 years.   Defendant evicted tenant because she was a slob.    However, plaintiff room was full of leftover food, and all kinds of garbage.   Defendant says room had a stench, and cost $1,000 to clean up.   There is a video of a clean room by plaintiff, but defendant says video was taken the day plaintiff came to look at the room, not on move out.      Landlady should have had a professional cleaning service clean the rugs, the room, and the other areas.      Plaintiff gets $180. 

Edited December 12, 2019 by CrazyInAlabama

[Lady Iris]

On 12/10/2019 at 10:36 PM, PsychoKlown said:

I will not touch anyone’s phone because of germs and certainly would never entertain the thought of handling one that was dropped in a toilet 

Totally surprised that JJ was so willing to paw said phone. She really needs to have a box of surgical gloves handy just like JM 

Hah! I think the same thing when JJ takes stranger's phones. I'd ask Byrd to wipe it down with a clorox wipe first.

[bad things are bad]

Quote

Woman dated, or hooked up with both roommates at different times. 

That woman was/is a slut. I'd say the same about any guy who hooked up with that many people in such a short time frame

Quote

Plaintiff suing defendant contractor for shoddy work on a bathroom remodel. 

That work was horrible. Seems like the contractor should have paid more of a penalty for such a crap job. I know you get what you pay for, but still

[SRTouch]

2 hours ago, bad things are bad said:

That woman was/is a slut. I'd say the same about any guy who hooked up with that many people in such a short time frame

If I understood correctly, the precious baby she's growing inside belongs to the bf she says will be moving to Oregon to live with her....... anyone else think bf should question paternity ASAP to avoid lifetime of child support.... even without P casting doubt on whether she and bf are still together, I'd bet bf never makes move to join her - besides sounds like she'll already have moved on before he makes the move

[CrazyInAlabama]

3 p.m. episodes, both reruns, probably 2016-2017-

First-

German Shepherd Breeding Fail-Plaintiff suing German Shepherd (GSD) breeder, over a dog sale.    Defendant bought dog for $1,000, and sold adult female to plaintiff for breeding.  No written contract.     Dog was sold for $150 to plaintiff by defendant, and  claims as a pet not a breeding animal.  Plaintiff actually paid $75, but not the rest.    Plaintiff wanted to breed the female to defendant's stud, and usually gets pick of litter, and wants two this time.    Female has litter, and had a history of aggression, and bit one puppy so severely that it eventually lost an ear.    GSD's were supposed to be AKC registered, but they weren't.    After puppy was bitten, plaintiff asked defendant to look at the puppy (she's a vet tech).   Instead of finding a vet, they kept passing the puppy around so-called vet techs.        Puppies had never been to a vet, or the adult dog either before birth.   

I hate all of these people, they are bad people.    The other three puppies were sold at 8 weeks, but hadn't seen a vet for shots or worming.   One sold for $800, and two for $500 each.    Plaintiff bought shots from Tractor Supply, and wormer too, and was going to give the shots herself.    The one-eared puppy was named him "Vincent Van Gogh"-no, I'm not kidding about the name, dog was donated to Dogs for Heroes.      There was a second puppy with a severe injury, and that was never treated either.  .   Plaintiff wanted papers for the dog, but claims she isn't going to breed her again.  Defendant ended up with four puppies.   Defendant has health certificates, which are required for sale in Florida.   Plaintiff was trying to sell the un-vetted puppies at five weeks, and claims the puppies are eight weeks.   Defendant wants three puppies, and the adult dog back.   Case dismissed for both sides.  

It's Mostly Nonsense-Plaintiff suing former landlord for security deposit, and the landlords claims there are a lot of damages.   Plaintiff claims she had house repainted, and it was clean inside.    There was an itemized list sent by landlord, and photos of 'damages'.    Landlord's damages are ridiculous.  Plaintiff gets $1300 security back. 

Second-

Car Deal Doubt-Plaintiff paid defendant $1,000 deposit on a car, and then she changed her mind.   Defendant sold the car for full price two days later ($2500), and kept the deposit anyway.    Plaintiff claims a mechanic looked at the car, but she couldn't discuss car issues until the day after she put down the deposit, and she thinks there are issues with the car.  So defendant made $3500 on a car he was selling for $2500.     Plaintiff gets the $1,000 back.  

Illegal Jeep Repo-Plaintiffs purchased car from defendants, and they agreed to pay off jeep in a few months, and never finished paying for it.  Plaintiffs want repo Jeep back.     Jeep was still in defendant's name, and plaintiff received a ticket and didn't pay it.  Defendant husband's license was suspended for the unpaid ticket.   Defendants are suing for ticket costs, and want proof the plaintiff paid for the ticket.  Plaintiff wife says ticket didn't have to be paid for six months.    Defendant's license was suspended five months after red light ticket occurred.      Plaintiff submits bad paperwork for the ticket, which was never paid.  Ticket went up to $780 for non-payment.    Plaintiff case dismissed, and defendant receives $780 to pay the ticket. 

[CrazyInAlabama]

5 p.m. episodes, first one new, second one a rerun-

First (New)-

Officer Byrd's Birthday Gift to the Judge-(Byrd and Mrs. Byrd bought JJ a lovely orchid for her birthday).   Plaintiff suing defendant for defendant's 12 year old son taking her car, and wrecking it (she wants $500 deductible, and down payment for another car).    Apparently, plaintiff didn't have gap insurance on her car.    Plaintiff asked by defendant to watch her two kids at night at plaintiff's house.   The defendant's kids, and plaintiff's son were sleeping in the living room, took the plaintiff's car keys, and took car on a joy ride.   Defendant delinquent says plaintiff's son found the car keys, and the defendant's son (12 at the time) was driving, and crashed the car two blocks away from the house.    Plaintiff claims the keys were in a drawer in her room, and she didn't leave the keys out. 

 Plaintiff son is living at a treatment facility, and only comes home sometimes.   All three children survived the crash.    JJ points out that plaintiff's watching the kids was inadequate, and everything was her fault.   The three kids were 11, 12, and 5 at the time, I'm surprised no one was killed.   Plaintiff claims that the defendant came to her home at 2 a.m. after this happens, and was driving Uber drunk.    Plaintiff thinks anyone will believe that a kid managed to sneak into her room, and take the keys out of the drawer without her noticing.   All cases dismissed.    Defendant's son has zero remorse. 

Trash or Treasure Hunters-Plaintiff suing ex-business partner for money owed for paid wages, stolen money, and damages.    The two men bid on abandoned storage units, and resell items with a 60/40 split at defendant's store space.   Plaintiff paid $6,000 for 40% of the business.    Then a week later the landlord showed the bounced check for rent the defendant wrote him to the plaintiff.      Defendant claims landlord cashed the check too early.   $6,000 plaintiff gave the defendant was spent on inventory according to the defendant but there is no proof.   Defendant claims all of the paperwork was in the resale store when the landlord padlocked it.   Store opened in June, plaintiff's deal happened in July.      Then when plaintiff was working in the store three men came in demanded their wages, so plaintiff paid them.   $5,000 to plaintiff, leaving him short a few thousand.  

Second (Rerun)-

Racing Motorcycle Rip-Off-Plaintiff suing mechanic for fraud, saying that mechanic didn't use original parts on plaintiff's racing motorcycle the plaintiff wrecked.    In the photo, it shows zip ties on the bike.    Plaintiff gave mechanic $3500, with a total of $5,000.   When plaintiff came to pick up motorcycle he was unhappy with the defendant's work, police said to pay the mechanic and sue him.    Plaintiff's accident case is still pending in court, and plaintiff alleges that other driver was at fault, however, plaintiff can't discuss that part of the case. 

 Plaintiff wants to be paid for the mechanic's work, but wants the other driver to pay him for the motorcycle too.       JJ in convinced it's two different cases.    There are photos of the pre-accident bike, the wrecked bike, and the after photos of the repair.   The wiring harness is zip tied to the bike!     The original parts are ordered only from Honda, but plaintiff claims after market cheap parts were used.    Plaintiff had another estimate that was much more expensive, and defendant was cheaper.      When you ask for a cheaper repair, you get cheaper parts.      Motorcycle is being driven, and plaintiff is still whining.   Case dismissed.  

[nora1992]

I’m torn about the case and the two single mothers: on the one hand, a pre-teen did sneak out in the middle of the night on a babysitter’s watch, but I find it hard to believe it was the first time he ever did something like that.  He seemed to know what he was about, and managed to get a disabled companion and a toddler with him; that takes practice.

The plaintiff shouldn’t have to carry the entire burden.  What is it teaching the defendant’s son if he can hide behind someone else’s negligence?  Unless the plaintiff was passed out in a stupor, the defendant should have had to pay something.

In JJ’s America, shouldn’t the kid have to learn there are consequences for bad behavior?  Again, I keep coming back to the sequence of events:

12-year-old steals keys, gets a physically challenged peer and a toddler outside without waking anyone else in the house, drives off in car and crashes it.  Maybe the driving was the first time, but it seems like the rest had been done before.  

If he had injured someone, then would the mother have been charged with child neglect too, for leaving him with the plaintiff?

It just seems as if he’s been spared any consequences from bad actions; it will come as a shock to him when he finally is held responsible.

Again, I don’t think the plaintiff was blameless, but there is so much blame to go around, the 12-year-old should (or his mother) should feel it too.

[CrazyInAlabama]

3 p.m. episodes, both reruns, probably 2016-

First-

When Ex-Mother-in-Laws Attack-Plaintiff (former Mother-in-Law) of defendant is suing for unpaid loans.    Defendant was divorced from MIL's son, and they have since remarried each other.    MIL claims she loaned $350, and $1200.    Plaintiff's name was on a car, and defendant claims husband, and defendant paid $500 a month, because defendant had bad credit.   Plaintiff repo'd the car.    What a bizarre family, MIL was sending defendant's incarcerated son in prison huge sums of money.    MIL has no proof of loans, except the $350, so plaintiff gets $350.  

Love Triangle Disaster-Plaintiff suing ex-girlfriend for a tractor.    After plaintiff's now girlfriend replaced defendant (plaintiff's current girlfriend was best friend of defendant), litigants broke up.   Defendant also had another guy.    Plaintiff claims he paid for the house, that is in the defendant's name (he admits he was that stupid), and defendant is still living in.   The litigants lived together for nine years, with joint checking.    Plaintiff wants his tractor back, and they have two cars together.     Case is dismissed.    The Supreme Court couldn't untangle this mess.   

Metal Pipe Slam-Plaintiff suing former friend and co-worker for damaging his car with a metal pipe.   Plaintiff was living as a tenant with defendant and wife, and plaintiff stayed after defendant and wife split up.    Plaintiff drove soon-to-be ex-wife to defendant's place of business, and serve def. with divorce papers, that's when plaintiff claims defendant hit his car with a wrench or pipe.   Defendant was totally responsible.  $2383 to plaintiff.  

Second-

Vegas Birthday Fail-Plaintiff suing her sister over a trip to Vegas, and damages to a rental car.   ( Defendant's phone goes off in JJ's court, and I hope Byrd shows woman what a broken phone looks like.    Sisters went to Vegas for defendant's birthday, with seven people).  There were two cars, one was a rental that defendant was in.   Plaintiff says she loaned defendant $200 for rent, and then for the rental car.   Second car broke down, and plaintiff rented a car for defendant, and that defendant would pay for rental after the first day.  Car was supposed to be returned after three days, but defendant was supposed to pay for two more days, the gas tank was empty, and someone smoked in the car.      Defendant was too young to rent a car on her own, and only had a driver's permit, not a license.  $200 for the loan to plaintiff, nothing for the car.  

Puppy Takes a Bad Fall-Plaintiff wants payment for vet bills for her cute Pomeranian puppy.   Defendant was watching the plaintiff's two little kids, and defendant's one kid, at plaintiff's home.   Children were playing in one kid's room, and puppy was injured, supposedly fell off of the bed, and broke his leg.    Case dismissed.  

Rookie Driver Mistake-Plaintiff suing defendant for car accident.  Defendant had on right turn blinker, and instead wanted to turn left, and did, causing the accident.  This was two days after defendant received her driver's license.   For once, the car was insured but defendant daughter wasn't named on the policy, and plaintiff has full coverage.     Father of defendant still swears his daughter was not at fault (yes, she was).   Defendant daughter does not seem to be a rocket scientist in training.     Defendant is also suing for her car damage.  Plaintiff went through his insurance, because defendant's insurance refused to pay.       Plaintiff gets $5,000 , and defendant and her father are still fools.  

[CrazyInAlabama]

5 p.m. episodes, first one new, second one recent rerun-

First (New)-

From Old Bus to Leaky Boutique-Plaintiff suing contractor for work on a bus to boutique conversion.   The bus/boutique leaked, and contractor claimed he fixed the leak, and never heard from plaintiff again.  Bus was bought from auction, and is almost 20 years old.  Plaintiff had a more expensive contractor, and went with a cheaper contractor.  $4200 was the estimate by defendant to seal the windows, and top emergency exit hatch, and plaintiff paid the $4200.   How can plaintiff claim top hatch leak caused rust and mold, but says it was after the hatch work, and not before?     

Plaintiff hasn't repaired the bus, and she's using her car for pop up boutiques.    Are you allowed to limit the exits on a bus you intend to drive, and sheet rock over the windows?   Plaintiff doesn't want patches, but wants everything redone, and wants more money back than she paid originally.     Estimate for repairs are for resealing, $500, but the rest is to repair extras.      Case dismissed.  

Second (Rerun)-

Deceased Father Fraud-Plaintiff suing brother over proceeds from deceased father's house.   Plaintiff suing her brother for her cut of a house worth sold for $7500, that had to be repaired.  House was sold to grandson, but his mother is on the title, and house is now rented.       I bet plaintiff is mostly upset at sister-in-law being on the title to the house (she loaned money to son) .   As I recall from the first airing of this, the home is in an area where the houses are super cheap, and (Decatur, IL) houses aren't worth much.   If house really had non-functioning heat, and that much damage, then it wasn't worth $11k.   I think sister should get $1200, minus her part of funeral costs.  (By the way, Zillow estimates are not very accurate, and that's what JJ used).

Mutilated Privacy Hedge-Plaintiff suing neighbor over trimming of an 18 foot privacy hedge.   Defendant is blaming several break-ins at his house on the hedge.    The defendant has cut hedge before.    Also, the tree branches were hanging over the defendants property, so he had every right to cut them.   I guess plaintiff will care about home burglaries when her house gets hit.     $5,000 to plaintiff.     

[Cindyluwho]

On 12/12/2019 at 3:58 PM, CrazyInAlabama said:

3 p.m. episodes, both reruns, probably 2016-2017-

First-

German Shepherd Breeding Fail-Plaintiff suing German Shepherd (GSD) breeder, over a dog sale.    Defendant bought dog for $1,000, and sold adult female to plaintiff for breeding.  No written contract.     Dog was sold for $150 to plaintiff by defendant, and  claims as a pet not a breeding animal.  Plaintiff actually paid $75, but not the rest.    Plaintiff wanted to breed the female to defendant's stud, and usually gets pick of litter, and wants two this time.    Female has litter, and had a history of aggression, and bit one puppy so severely that it eventually lost an ear.    GSD's were supposed to be AKC registered, but they weren't.    After puppy was bitten, plaintiff asked defendant to look at the puppy (she's a vet tech).   Instead of finding a vet, they kept passing the puppy around so-called vet techs.        Puppies had never been to a vet, or the adult dog either before birth.   

I hate all of these people, they are bad people.    The other three puppies were sold at 8 weeks, but hadn't seen a vet for shots or worming.   One sold for $800, and two for $500 each.    Plaintiff bought shots from Tractor Supply, and wormer too, and was going to give the shots herself.    The one-eared puppy was named him "Vincent Van Gogh"-no, I'm not kidding about the name, dog was donated to Dogs for Heroes.      There was a second puppy with a severe injury, and that was never treated either.  .   Plaintiff wanted papers for the dog, but claims she isn't going to breed her again.  Defendant ended up with four puppies.   Defendant has health certificates, which are required for sale in Florida.   Plaintiff was trying to sell the un-vetted puppies at five weeks, and claims the puppies are eight weeks.   Defendant wants three puppies, and the adult dog back.   Case dismissed for both sides.  

Had a really hard time paying attention during ths case  because I kept seeing Marla Hooch from A League of Their Own.

https://images.app.goo.gl/P6N5bTJ52Jf4D6D66

Edited December 14, 2019 by Cindyluwho

[CrazyInAlabama]

12 hours ago, Cindyluwho said:

Had a really hard time paying attention during ths case  because I kept seeing Marla Hooch from A League of Their Own.

Thanks for that!    I knew she looked familiar, but just couldn't figure out why.  

[CrazyInAlabama]

3 p.m. both episodes reruns, probably 2016-2017-

First-

Mixed Up Priorities-Plaintiff bought car from defendant/car dealership owner, over a 2002 E 320 Mercedes he bought from the dealership.   Plaintiff claims there was a 30 day warranty, however it was not in the written, signed contract.    $3500 for the purchase price,  However, he paid for fancy rims, but made no payments on the car loan, so it was repo'd.   $1,000 was the down payment, $362 a month were the payments, and he made only one payment, and he claims one more payment, but that's it.   As usual, plaintiff claims he made more cash payments, but the receipts were in the glove compartment of the repo. car.  

However defendant/car dealer wants repo and rekey fees, and she doesn't get that, because it's not in the written contract (I bet the dealership added it right after the taping of the case).     Case dismissed, and defendant claims too. 

Single Moms Split-Plaintiff suing former friend for return of security deposit.   Defendant moved from Florida to Connecticut to room together with their children.   Defendant was going to stay with plaintiff in the 1 bedroom for a month, and they put a security deposit on the bigger apartment, but current tenants stayed an extra month.   So plaintiff moved some items into the garage at the new apartment.   Defendant changed her mind about moving into the apartment, and plaintiff wants her security back.    Defendant moved back to Florida.  Defendant claims plaintiff moved into the apartment, and is using defendant's security deposit of $550.    Defendant gets $550 security back.  

Second-

Diamond Disaster-Plaintiff claims his former fiance kept his engagement ring.  Defendant claims he gave her a cubic zirconium in the ring, and wanted her to put her diamond in the ring.     Plaintiff told he's not getting the setting back.  

Plaintiff wants a rebate back for selling artificial turf to the defendant.   Plaintiff says he paid almost $8k for turf, and she only paid $2000.    Rebate check was  $4400, and she should keep 25%, and 75% for him.      The Hyundai he's driving was bought by her, and his name isn't on it.    After the breakup he dropped the Hyundai off at her house, after she refused to sell it to him.  $3300 to plaintiff, and that's it. 

BMW v.s Ford Focus-Plaintiff / BMW owner, suing driver of Ford Focus over a car accident.   Plaintiff is rather dim on facts of accident, date, time.     Plaintiff had liability, defendant had full coverage.    Plaintiff says were traveling the same direction on the highway, he was in the center lane, and claims the defendant came into his lane, and hit his car.   Defendant claims she was in the far right lane, changed to the center lane, and claims plaintiff rammed her car.   Defendant actually says that plaintiff hit her deliberately.   Defendant lied and said the plaintiff crossed the line and hit her.   

It is obvious that defendant hit the plaintiff's car, and lied to her insurance company.   Plaintiff had his car repaired, and gets that back $935.     Defendant gets what she deserves, which is nothing, and I hope her insurance company dumped her.  

[CrazyInAlabama]

5 p.m. episodes, first one new, second one a recent rerun-

First (New)-

Duck and Cover, Children-Plaintiffs suing neighbor for trespassing, and property damage.   Plaintiffs claims neighbor or her guests cut down a group of plaintiffs trees for firewood for her property.  It is clear the trees are on plaintiff's property, and there is a trail of branches, and debris leading to the neighbor's property, and wood pile.   One day in April, plaintiff wife says they were picking up yard debris, when someone started shooting into their yard, and she told her children to hide behind a truck, and caledl 911.    Defendant and her friends were shooting on their property, towards neighbor property, and police told them to stop shooting.   Defendant denies cutting down trees, or taking the fire wood to her property.   

Plaintiffs own 60 acres.   Plaintiff points out defendant's yard is fenced, and has a closed gate.   The defendant's wood pile is on plaintiff's property, and the defendant fetches wood from the pile.    I think the plaintiffs should advertise free fire wood, and get rid of the defendant's wood pile.  Plaintiffs get $250.     Defendant has a counter claim for filing a false restraining order from the shooting incident, dismissed.   (Plaintiff husband mentions they don't think they'll have issues with defendant again, because wood pile is gone, and she's in a lot of trouble with the law for other things). 

Missing: My $2600 Dentures-Plaintiff suing former roommate for stealing his car, and lost wages.   Defendant's defense says car was stolen while he was dropping off someone at the airport, and it's not his fault.  Defendant counter suing for lost property.   Plaintiff swears that defendant never drove his car, and never had his permission.  $821 to plaintiff, and defendant gets nothing for his dentures that were in the car. 

Boston Terrier's Scary Genes-Plaintiff suing defendant over a failed scheme to breed Boston Terriers.  Plaintiff bought female Boston, to breed with his male Boston.     Plaintiff used to breed Pit Bulls, but quit, and wanted to breed Bostons.     Male Boston had no papers, was $700, bought female for $850, and was told not to buy his first choice by plaintiff.   FIrst puppy he was told not to buy had Hydrocephalus.      Female puppy, and male puppy get along very well.    Vet said that female puppy could have a genetic disease, and not to breed the puppy.     Plaintiff keeps the puppy, and gets no money.    Plaintiff could only get the money if he gave the puppy back.    

Second (Rerun)-

Assault Rifle Misfire-Plaintiff hired woman to be his mother's caregiver, and during plaintiff's absence (for several months), and defendant would live rent free, and take care of mother.    Plaintiff suing for property damage by defendant.   Defendant claims to be a registered nurse, but does not have a license, and works as a home health aide.    Damages include shooting of TV, and wall by defendant and her drunken friends.  All of the guns were secured in a cabinet, and in his locked bedroom.     Plaintiff's stepson came by the house to check on it, in February, and saw gun cabinet was broken open, defendant's clothes were in the master bedroom (it was supposed to be kept locked).      Defendant asked about cabinet and TV, and blames it on the Airbnb guests (apparently the plaintiff also has an Airbnb in part of the house).   

I wouldn't let defendant take care of a Gerbil, let alone a helpless person.   Defendant's witness is a scary as the defendant.     Defendant never called the police, or the homeowner/plaintiff.     $4400 to plaintiff.  (Plaintiff says defendant is a convicted felon, has he not heard of a background check before hiring someone to take care of your elderly, ill mother, and giving them access to your home for six months?)

Incarcerated Baby Daddy's Big Decision-Plaintiff suing her grandson's baby mama for a loan ($1,000) to bail grandson out of jail.    Grandson has one other child with another woman, and all this by 22 years old.     Grandmother is still focusing on the grandchildren, and how she doesn't see them, not JJ's issue.     Plaintiff took a title loan out on her car to get the money for grandson's bail.       Defendant says she talked to the other baby mama, not the grandmother.    How lovely, the grandmother lives in my state, and the rest of them do too.  Grandson has moved on to a third girl friend now.  Case dismissed.  

Edited December 17, 2019 by CrazyInAlabama

[Bigfatcat]

1 hour ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

Assault Rifle Misfire-Plaintiff hired woman to be his mother's caregiver, and during plaintiff's absence (for several months), and defendant would live rent free, and take care of mother.    Plaintiff suing for property damage by defendant.   Defendant claims to be a registered nurse, but does not have a license, and works as a home health aide.    g

Robin Preutzel - I hope the Board of Nursing in Virginia charges with practicing nursing without a license. I could not find a current license for her. Scary that she is allowed in close contact with the fragile elderly

https://eldercare.com/let-me-care-for-your-loved-one-like-they-were-my-own-family-home-

https://www.bailbondsearch.com/virginia/virginiabeach-inmate-PRUETZEL/18-005184worker-virginia-beach-va

http://www.cityofchesapeake.net/Assets/documents/departments/circuit_court_clerk/docket/2018/08+(AUGUST)/2018-08-13+Docket.pdf

[Guest]

3 hours ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

Duck and Cover, Children-Plaintiffs suing neighbor for trespassing, and property damage.   Plaintiffs claims neighbor or her guests cut down a group of plaintiffs trees for firewood for her property.

It was clear to me that the one-eyed, gun nut She-Hulk was using the plaintiff's property as her personal stash of heating for god knows how many years and that shooting the guns off was some form of keeping the plaintiffs away from what she was doing. But there goes JJ again, knower of nothing, refusing to give the plaintiffs any financial relief because the trees were "old." I'm fairly sure if those "old" trees were on HER property and some neighbor was stealing them to heat THEIR house, she'd have them arrested for theft AND sue them for far more than $5,000.

[Toaster Strudel]

15 minutes ago, Giant Misfit said:

refusing to give the plaintiffs any financial relief because the trees were "old."

And because they had a lot of acreage.

None of that should matter. The defendant needed to be taught a lesson.

She had this shit-eating grin in the hallterview, she was very pleased with herself that she got away with something.

[khyber]

Does anyone know where the firewood stealing people live? I'm guessing Oregon.  Also, how did the car stealer loose his dentures? Did they fly out when he crashed the car that he said was stolen?

[CrazyInAlabama]

The missing dentures were in the plaintiff's car when the defendant drove someone to the airport, and when the car was stolen, the dentures went with the car.    I bet the $2600 bonanza the defendant hoped for was to pay for dentures, and I bet he's never had dentures.  

Edited December 18, 2019 by CrazyInAlabama