All Episodes Talk: All Rise

[Taeolas]

So this is the final season; I'm a bit surprised they aren't making a bigger deal about it. Especially since the final episode should be coming up soon. Hell they're barely making a deal that this is the 25th (Silver) season. 

 

Granted the format of the show doesn't leave much room for commentary since the cases are the focus and should be 'timeless'. But at the same time, I think they missed an opportunity to not carve out a couple minutes each ep for Judy (and/or Byrd) to comment and reminisce or something. COVID probably crimped some of their plans, along with Jerry Bishop's death before the start of the season. But at the same time, in the COVID-less world next door, I suspect the Judge Judy 25th season would still have gone on like it has 24 seasons before with no 'extras' (like Judge Mathis and TPC have done)

Edited May 25, 2021 by Taeolas

[CrazyInAlabama]

4 p.m. reruns-

First (2018)-

Falsely Imprisoned Bad Driver?! -Plaintiff Matthew Angeleiri suing defendant  Stacey Griffall for car damages from her hitting his parked car. Defendant claims she slammed on her brakes, backed to let the person in the spot leaving, backed into the parking space,  and never hit plaintiff's car.   Defendant claims the plaintiff was in his car, and behind her car.  

  Defendant claims she never hit plaintiff's car, and he wouldn't let her leave until the police arrived.    Defendant was going to the surplus store, next to a pizzeria, where plaintiff was shopping.    

Defendant says her insurance "overlapsed".    (If she doesn't have a record, then why does she 'proceeded' to everything, and the usual regular court denizen vocabulary?)

However, the video tells us that the defendant is lying to JJ.  Plaintiff says defendant actually backed up in the active traffic lane on the street, when she backed into his car, his license plate jerks, and defendant pulls into the parking lot at the surplus store.  Impact was on driver's side front fender, dents match the plaintiff's car's dents. 

Plaintiff receives $4200 for car damages.  JJ dismisses defendant's ridiculous counter claim.  (Officer Byrd has to boot defendant's boyfriend)

In hall-terview, plaintiff says defendant has no insurance, no license, the usual. 

What Does Judge Judy Hate?! -  (JJ says she hates phone cases, but I bet I hate them more).  Plaintiff Ashley Gack suing defendant Cheyenne Herron over a small loan, plus payments for a cell phone, and paying defendant's car insurance payment.    Defendant claims that plaintiff paid her insurance bill as her Christmas present, and as JJ points out, I wouldn't know who to pay for anyone but myself.    

Defendant's texts agree she would pay back the plaintiff. 

Plaintiff didn't take phone away from defendant.

$260 for phone bill. 

Second (2018)-

Cute Yorkie Makes Court Debut! -Plaintiff/Yorkie owner Holly Chiancola is suing defendant Anthony Deyeso for vet bills, after his dog attacked her cute, helpless, Yorkie, Bo, for $4,002 in vet bills.  Plaintiff was on a public beach, just for the day.   The beach is accessible by boat, and plaintiff let dog off leash, and Yorkie went over to defendant, and his dog.   Plaintiff claims off leash is allowed on the beach.   Bo went about 60 yards away from plaintiff, and plaintiff saw Bo was fine, and she went back to her chair, and her back was to her dog.    (Who lets a dog sixty feet away, off leash?).     

Then, plaintiff claims she heard someone yelling "Get out of here!", claims defendant kicked at her dog, and then defendant's dog attacked (they were at defendant dog's water bowl).     It was supposed to be a community water bowl.   Plaintiff's dog was out of her control, and encroaching on the defendant's dog.    

Why did plaintiff allow her dog to be 60 yards away from her, on an off-leash area.   Plaintiff claims defendant's dog attacked a man a few months before little Bo's run in.   (My view matches JJ, plaintiff was at fault, irresponsible, and the dog's injuries were her fault, and defendant isn't responsible).   Plaintiff claims she went to dog court (I'm not commenting on that), after this, and defendant dog now has to be on leashed, and muzzled, but not in effect at the time of this incident. 

Plaintiff witness is just as obnoxious as plaintiff is.  

Plaintiff case dismissed.   

Amusement Park Not So Amusing! -Plaintiff/cousin Nick Roman suing defendant/cousin  Jomaries Perez for tickets for Six Flags for herself, and her two kids charged to plaintiff's debit card.     Cousins/litigants are fighting over tickets and food passes for an amusement park (Six Flags).   Season passes are for unlimited admissions, and three meals a day, for the entire year.     Adult are $140 each, with food passes.  So, one each for Jomarie, her two kids, and another season pass.   Defendant claims plaintiff used the fourth pass himself. .  $1,132 is the total, and defendant only paid plaintiff.

Defendant says she bought the three passes for herself, and her two kids, and claims plaintiff used the other season pass.   Plaintiff is 22, and says he hasn't been to Six Flags in years.  Plaintiff says the non-payment by defendant has hurt his credit.  The charges were on a payment plan of 87.50 a month.   $445 is what defendant paid, but the total for the four passes, with the meal plans in $1,132.     The first notice plaintiff received was $687 owed on the tickets from Six Flags.    Plaintiff never went to Six Flags (since he was 16).

$687 to plaintiff 

 

[CrazyInAlabama]

5 p.m. episodes-

First -

Tenant Freeze Out (2021) -Plaintiff /tenant Valentine Linch suing defendant/former landlord Chris Cartwright, and tenant claims there were heating and ceiling water leak issues. Plaintiff moved in during August.   As the months wore on, defendant and property manager were notified, and did nothing.   Defendant/property manager gave a check for the security deposit when plaintiff moved out in January, but the check had a stop payment on it.  Plaintiff is suing for security deposit, moving costs (not happening).     Defendant want the rest of the one year lease paid to him.      Defendant says the plaintiff should have used the wood pellet stove.    

As JJ points out, having no heat in the California mountains in the winter is constructive eviction.  

Plaintiff gets his security deposit back, defendant case dismissed. 

Roommate Rebel (2014) -Plaintiff/former tenant Alek "A.J." Robbins suing defendant/former roommate Jessica  Haney for his rent back. .    Plaintiff gave February rent to defendant to pay, they had a dust up over parking, and plaintiff wanted his rent back.  Plaintiff case dismissed.  Contract was $450 a month rent each, and 30 days notice to move.     

Defendant is counter claiming for plaintiff holding her against her will.   Defendant says plaintiff forcibly took her to the bank, and tried to get his money back that way.  Defendant says when plaintiff was moving out, she wanted him to move the truck so she could get out of their way, and he wanted to follow defendant to the bank to get his $450 back.   Then defendant was on her cell phone, and the police showed up.   Defendant said that plaintiff held her against her will, and intimidated her, and tried to force her to give him his money back.   

Defendant says she was blocked in by plaintiff and brother, and she called the Sheriff from her car, and she was on the phone with Sheriff's officers all the way to the bank.   

Plaintiff case dismissed.   

Defendant case dismissed (no police report, or charges filed). 

Second –

Cannabis Yoga Studio (2021) -Plaintiff /tenant Liston Grace suing defendant/landlord Lizbeth Rodriguez for evicting him, and loss of property in a leased space.   Defendant owns a building, and plaintiff claims his buy wholesale, sell retail clothing business (I think t-shirt printing?), and claims he subleased from the legal tenant of the space.  Defendant never had a lease or payment from the plaintiff.  The building was a Cannabis Yoga business.    Defendant never received any money from plaintiff, or met him before she saw him in her space.      Plaintiff was directing someone repairing a part of a burned roof (roof is claimed to be burned twice).     Plaintiff says he paid original tenant $2,000. 

When defendant saw him in October, she told him she had rented the space to someone else, and he needed to get out.    A week later defendant changed the locks, with the sheriff's department's help.     Defendant started getting messages from plaintiff, about his stuff.   As JJ says, plaintiff is a squatter, and not a tenant.        Plaintiff says defendant tossed his stuff in the fenced front yard, and he wants his fridge and microwave back. 

Original tenant was for a Cannabis Yoga studio, and they were the original tenant, and code enforcement told defendant to get them out of the building.   Also, plaintiff was living in the 'yoga studio', which is also illegal.   There are photos of plaintiff's stuff inside the 6 foot wrought iron fence.     Plaintiff put clothing sales items, in storage containers in the driveway for plaintiff to pick up.    

There were two fires on the roof of the building, but no one admits to doing it.  Plaintiff claims he has a security video of two people pouring gas on the roof, and lighting it.  However, video is unavailable.   

Defendant says the fire was caused by illegal electrical hook-ups. 

Defendant case dismissed.    

Plaintiff case dismissed. 

Three’s a Crowd (2014) -  Plaintiff/roommate Kyle Craig is suing former roommates Evan Towle, and Stephanie McGuigan for their share of damages to their apartment.   They rented the apartment together, split the rent three ways.    Plaintiff moved out months before the end of the lease, after defendants say they asked him to leave, and plaintiff paid his third of the rent through the end of the lease.   Plaintiff said he just left. 

McGuigan/defendant wants to be paid for cleaning the apartment.   The total for damages were $1800, which plaintiff paid the entire amount.   Plaintiff wants $600 each from defendants.    Defendants blame everything on plaintiff, and his drinking.   

$1200 to plaintiff.  

[CrazyInAlabama]

4 p.m. reruns-

First (2018)-

Alabama Section 8 Payback! -Plaintiff/realtor David Herman is suing defendant/home owner, Ade "Addy" Kamson.    The realtor's idea is to get a man to invest in house, rehab it, and rent Section 8.    Realtor (not broker, I've heard that explanation for the last time) with 40 years experience, moves tenant in, never gets the Section 8 approved, and tenant never pays rent either.     Pretty much (I almost said Basically!) the realtor is a jerk, should lose his license, and get nailed for fraud too.

Defendant trying to sell house, (good luck selling a townhouse in many parts of Montgomery, even in today's market), can't sell, and plaintiff talks owner into leasing town house Section 8, and giving realtor $4,800 for repairs to pass Section 8 inspection.    Plaintiff/realtor wants more money for repairs, has janky 'invoices', never gets the house up to Section 8 standards, and rents to loser tenant (just to keep the place occupied) who never pays a penny for rent.     

Realtor/plaintiff claims he had an oral agreement with defendant, and idiot realtor should know that real estate oral agreements are useless, and have to be written and signed by both parties.      JJ rejects handwritten invoices that plaintiff obviously forged himself.     Tenant moved in and didn't collect rent for two months.     Apparently, tenant had to wait for Section 8 inspector, but I think that's done before move in.      David Herman, realtor (of Montgomery, AL worked for Eddins something company), moved in tenant, no rent, no agreement with owner/defendant.   

Tenant never paid owner, her three grown kids lived there, and only paid her $410 portion of the rent three months, and tenant was in jail for six months.   Owner had to evict the deadbeat tenant's grown kids after over a year with everyone living in the property.      As a property manager, David Herman did not do what he contracted to do, has no clue about what anyone paid for anything, or that the tenant was a deadbeat.   In April defendant received $1600 for March and April from Section 8, and never received a penny from tenants.   Woman was in jail six months, and was evicted in February, after living in home for 14 Months (January of one year, to February of next year).   It took from October to February to evict tenant, and tenants left a lot of junk behind, and house was trashed. 

I hate it when either litigant fails to bring proof to court. 

Plaintiff gets $0, and deserves even less.    

Defendant gets $0.

Second (2018)-

Shocking Tree Trimming! -Plaintiffs mother, Pong Mckibben, and son, John McKibben  are   suing defendant Dwight McGill. (a neighbor's brother).   Plaintiffs (mother is owner, son was house-sitting) are suing defendant for cutting down trees on their property without permission.   Plaintiffs want $5,000 to replace their Chinook Cherry trees (they look lovely, and big for cherry trees).    The defendant wants $1,000 for cutting down the trees.   THe remaining tree stumps are hideous.    Defendant was cutting trees and bushes on his brother's (neighbor of plaintiff) property, and claims Ms. McKibben wanted him to cut down brush, and two trees (they were not the cherry trees, but dead trees, she paid defendant for.  The others were Wax Myrtles, paid $200 down, and $200 final payment.   

9 days later plaintiff parents went to Korea for four months, and son was house sitting, and defendant came to plaintiff house, claimed mother hired him to cut two more trees.     Plaintiff contacted his parents, who told him to just supervise and pay the lawn mowing, or leaf collection services every two weeks.      Defendant wouldn't give his phone number to plaintiff son.   Then, son went to work for the day, came home, and the cherry trees were cut down.    Parents called son, said they didn't authorize anyone to cut the mother's favorite cherry trees down.     

Even I am stunned at the defendant's actions, even though I've seen this at least twice before.    

$5,000 to plaintiffs

Ex-Lover Slashing?! -Plaintiff Donna Buerhaus suing defendant /ex-boyfriend Timothy Ervin,  for slashing the tires on her truck, and scratched the side of her truck, after seeing her with her new boyfriend.     

(What the hell is wrong with the plaintiff's upper teeth?)   Defendant has been in and out of prison for years.    When defendant got home from prison, after 30 days, he says he came to pick up his vehicle, and put a new battery in it.    Someone loaned defendant a battery, dropped him off at plaintiff's house, and defendant saw another man at the house, realized he had been dumped again.    Defendant wanted jumper cables, and knocked on the door to borrow cables, and says he thought he could be friends with plaintiff, and stay at her house to get back on his feet.   

Plaintiff has a witness, a neighbor, who claims she saw defendant slash the tires, and scratch the truck.  (The litigants and witnesses all have jacked up teeth, how sad). 

Plaintiff receives $1800 for tires, and the scratch repair. 

 

[CrazyInAlabama]

5 p.m. episodes-

First -

Near-Death Experience (2021)- Plaintiff /driver Terrance Taylor  suing defendant/driver De'Ray Evens who hit him.   Plaintiff says defendant totaled his car, injured him severely.    THis happened on 5 November 2020, plaintiff paid $12000 for a used Mercedes, purchased a year before.    Plaintiff went through his own insurance, and received $11,270.   Plaintiff suing for $5,000, for lost wages, and pain and suffering. Plaintiff says his arm injury required a sling, and he couldn't work for the rest of November.   Plaintiff didn't consult an attorney (he's in Worker's Comp insurance).    Plaintiff says he couldn't move his arm, and had to wear a sling for the rest of the month.   Medical report from 6 November is submitted, from the ER, and two other pages of reports.   As plaintiff says, he could have been killed by defendant's bad driving.   

Defendant seems very bored, and I would like to remove his facial piercings with pliers.   (My anger issues are coming up today).   Defendant claims he had Kemper /Infinity insurance.  The night of the accident, plaintiff contacted the defendant's insurance company, and started the claim process.    An adjustor was sent out later, but the insurance company said defendant wasn't covered after his first payment (very common, pay one payment, and get the registration renewed, and then don't pay after that).     Defendant keeps babbling to himself.    

Plaintiff says accident happened like this: Plaintiff was driving, with insurance, was going straight, when defendant made an illegal U-turn in front of him, and defendant hit the driver's side door, T-boned the plaintiff, and the defendant's car is half gone.   Plaintiff is lucky he wasn't killed.   As plaintiff says

JJ suspects defendant is high, and asks him if he's taking controlled substances.  He admits to drinking the day before.

$2000 to plaintiff. 

8-Year-Old Takes the Stand? (2014) -Plaintiff Karen Hill suing mother of neighbor child Kim Kelly for vandalism (plaintiff says defendant's son Adrian, was riding his bicycle, and hit her car scratching it).      

Adrian takes stand, and totally changes his story of how the vandalism happened, and who did it. (This is where the little boy testifies, and JJ assures him that she won't bite him, and hasn't bitten an 8 year-old in a long time).    Adrian told plaintiff he hit her car, and now says he didn't, but only said he did because he was scared of plaintiff.    Adrian was riding alone, went to make a left turn, fell off bike onto the sidewalk.    Adrian claimed he didn't hit the car, but just said he did because he was scared.   Adrian went to get his mother, because plaintiff wanted to talk to his mother. 

$874 for plaintiff.

Second –

Boat Repair Rip-Off?!(2021) -Plaintiff / boat owner James Anderson suing defendant/boat mechanic Gregory Shoemaker says he took boat to defendant to repair, but mechanic did way more than he authorized, or is willing to pay for.     Plaintiff ran the fiberglass boat into a cleat, and damaged it (actually shredded the boat).    Estimate for repair was $400+, and the gelcoat $3,000+, so $3,400+, from defendant.  

Plaintiff says defendant did the repair, but only waxed the boat, and not the gel coat, to fix the stress cracks.   Charge for repair was $2850, and plaintiff wants $2400 back.   

Defendant says they repaired the boat, and gel coated both sides of the back of the boat.  Defendant says both sides of the back lower corner of the boat were damaged.   Defendant gel coated the back corners of the boat, and removed many feet of old tape pin stripe (had been on the boat for 20 years), and had to do that by hand.    Plaintiff submits a finished picture of the boat, which looks spectacular.   

Plaintiff didn't pay to get the gel coat done to get the stress cracks fixed.   However, that wasn't what the estimate covered, and so it wasn't performed.

Plaintiff case dismissed.    

A Family’s Feud (2014)- Plaintiffs Dale and Isabelle Worrell suing son/defendant Pascal Worrell  for non-payment of a car loan.  Plaintiffs co-signed for the loan, and father was primary.   Loan was for a $8,000 with Pascal paying $4,000 down, and car was titled in father and son's name.    Parents didn't like the son's schedule, and sent him to live with their pastor.   

Pascal says the father had full control of his bank account, and father was making all of the payments.   Father says he didn't let son take the car to the pastor's house, but had to call home to request the use of the car.    Father gave son $3500, that was part of what son put down, and then father sold the car.   Father is suing for the remainder of the loan from selling the car. 

Father deprived son of his car, his property.   and sold the car after having car for a year.  

Plaintiff case dismissed, and I hope Pascal has moved on, far away from these people. 

(This case reminded me of the equally religious parents who wanted their daughter arrested for getting her cat back that the mother kept, after they threw the daughter out.  That set of parents had a bunch of kids, and everyone was estranged from them)

 

Edited May 27, 2021 by CrazyInAlabama

[One Tough Cookie]

47 minutes ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

Plaintiff case dismissed, and I hope Pascal has moved on, far away from these peop

I hated those smug overbearing parents and I hope Pascal is able to break away from therm.

[Back Atcha]

5 hours ago, One Tough Cookie said:

5 hours ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

Plaintiff case dismissed, and I hope Pascal has moved on, far away from these peop

I hated those smug overbearing parents and I hope Pascal is able to break away from therm.

After the hearing, Pascal said his parents didn't approve of his behavior.  He said it wasn't drugs or alcohol...it was videogames.  I bet that "pastor" had some kind of "pray away the games" system.  Pascal seems depressed; I hope he can latch onto some healthy friends with healthy families.

[CrazyInAlabama]

4 p.m. reruns-

First (2018)-

Deal with Your Child in Foster Care -Plaintiff Cindy Thomas wants to be paid for a $300 loan made to defendant/grandmother of plaintiff’s child,, Sue Norton,  but it was her son's money anyway.     Defendant is plaintiff's children's grandmother (I think).    Grandchildren's father has custody of plaintiff's 3 year-old son.  Another girl is in foster care, and taken out of her custody.    Defendant went to stay in Connecticut with plaintiff, partly because she met some guy online in New York, and defendant stayed with plaintiff for three weeks, and JJ says forget the rent. 

Defendant borrowed $300 from plaintiff, that plaintiff took from her son, and JJ tells her to stuff it.     I hate the plaintiff so much.     What a horrible mother.   She only cares about her kids when they're old enough to support her.   Plaintiff says her 21 year-old and 18 year-old son pays all of the bills. 

 Byrd had the swinging exit gates open before the case even finished, and I think he wanted to drag her butt out by her phony wig.  What a hateful woman the plaintiff is.  I feel so sorry for her other kids, and hope she never gets near them.  However, her two sons she's leaching off of should kick her to the curb before she bleeds them dry.  

Plaintiff case dismissed. 

Mom's Burial Policy  -Plaintiff Betty Ware, and her boyfriend Thomas Hutchinson, suing defendant James Ware over mother's burial policy, defendant says burial policy was surrendered by mother (Geraldine Long) in September 2016, and late mother received almost $2k for the policy.     

Plaintiff says brother defendant should have paid for the mother's burial out of policy that doesn't even exist.   Plaintiff wanted defendant to pay $4200 from the burial policy, plaintiffs paid $5373 for burial, and defendant already paid $1174.     

Defendant received $3100 from her pension payout, and he took care of the mother for 14 years.    In my experience, even if you're in assisted living, having someone who checks on you regularly can really help your situation.     Apparently, the daughter/plaintiff virtually never visited over the years.     Defendant agreed to pay half.   (I wouldn't have given plaintiff a penny).

Plaintiff gets $1836.    

Defective Sports Apparel Drama  -Plaintiff Florintino  Guerrero  suing for cost of having custom baseball caps for his men's softball team, with the numbers embroidered on the back, number was left off of the hats, ordered from defendant, MatTurbes.   Team had to play without hats for the season.   Plaintiff ordered 18 shirts and 18 hats, shirts were fine, and there was no written contract.    Seven hats were backordered, the other eleven had no numbers embroidered on the back.  Plaintiff didn't get a refund for the hats from the vendor, and didn't replace the hats.     Plaintiff says the hats have bad stitching.  

Plaintiff gets $491.    

Second (2017)-

Snake in the Basement! -Plaintiff Tara Davis suing former friend/defendant Jeaneches Perry/ tenant but sort of landlady,  (defendant is renting the house from someone else, and subletting the basement) for her property left behind after a two month tenancy. and her dog.   Plaintiff says her son saw a snake, and defendant says there was only one snake.  

Defendant gets SS disability, and rents the house, and her brother is paroled to the house.  Rent from defendant is $750, and her disability is $925, and she gets by renting rooms.    The basement is a big open room, and everyone shared the bedroom.  Brother lives in the attic.  Defendant says basement is finished, plaintiff says basement is an unfinished basement, and picture shows a big empty basement. 

  Plaintiff moved in with her 6 year old son, and a dog.    Plaintiff says she paid the $175 rent, a month late.    A month after move in plaintiff gave defendant $195, but should have paid $590.  Plaintiff is a CNA, and home health aide.     Rent was supposed to be $350. 

Plaintiff says she moved out after she saw snakes in the basement.   Defendant claims the landlord removed the one snake, and blocked the hole it entered through.  Then, plaintiff and son moved back in. Plaintiff claims the son saw the snake again.   

Plaintiff claims defendant wouldn't let her take her dog or her property, unless she paid the $240 she owed.     Plaintiff now says she doesn't want her property back, because it might have snakes in it, so that's dismissed.

Pit Bull was left behind for days after plaintiff left, and claims plaintiff wouldn't pick up the dog.   Defendant Jaeaneches Perry says dog was put in the back yard, and ran off.

$45 to defendant, nothing to plaintiff.

Truck Driving School Payback! -Plaintiff Grace Garcia suing former boyfriend Rafael Mendoza for loans for truck driving school, DMV fees.    They moved in together, he paid $831 for rent, and she paid food, and some utilities.   They only lived together for two months.  Plaintiff made a loan to defendant for truck driving school, for $4,000 (to qualify for truck driving jobs).   This loan was for their future together.

Defendant now has a truck driving job, and litigants split up, after two months.   Plaintiff put the loan for $4,000 on her credit card, and he repaid $300.    Defendant owes plaintiff $4500 (he makes about $10k a month now).  

$4200 to plaintiff, plus interest=$4500. 

[CrazyInAlabama]

5 p.m. episodes-

First-

Stolen Meds and Elder Abuse?! (2021) -Plaintiff/former client   Dana Pizzuto suing defendant/former caregiver Amanda Maestes  for stealing her medications, and endangering her from exposure to Covid.  Defendant used plaintiff's car, had an accident, and was cited for having an expired license.    Plaintiff had a heart attack, and defendant was supposed to take plaintiff to appointments, help her with errands.    Defendant claims she was only paid $500 once, and plaintiff has three cancelled checks made out, and cashed by defendant.    Defendant took plaintiff's car home once.    

Defendant claims she was in Covid quarantine, and was taking plaintiff to the cardiologist, was rear ended in plaintiff's car, and defendant denies she was in quarantine. 

JJ will hear the $2,000 loan from plaintiff to defendant.   JJ is dismissing the medication theft, no proof, and no police report.   Plaintiff loaned the $2,000 to defendant to get custody of her 13 and 15 year-old, children are in ex-husband's custody.  Plaintiff can prove $1700 loan.  Defendant is counter suing for unpaid wages, no proof.  Defendant's husband gets the Byrd boot. 

Plaintiff receives $2000. Defendant case dismissed. 

Disability Debit Card Craziness (2014) -Plaintiff Shannondoah Baker suing former friend/ defendant Cynthia Wagner for stealing money from her, kicking her out, and refused to return her belongings.   This was after plaintiff was in jail for possession of stolen property, and violating probation. .   Plaintiff took a plea, so pled guilty.   Plaintiff claims multiple disabilities, and diagnoses, and gets disability. 

Plaintiff was supposed to pay $300 a month rent to defendant, and gave her disability debit card to defendant.    Instead of $300, plaintiff claims defendant charged over $900 on the debit card.  Plaintiff mother/witness chimes in and claims she took car of incarcerated daughter's Rottweiler/Pit cross.   Defendant is counter suing for rent, dog sitting, utilities, etc.    

Defendant says the sweater plaintiff is wearing in court, actually belongs to the defendant. 

Defendant submits a signed, witnessed contract with plaintiff. Plaintiff denies signing the contract.  Plaintiff claims defendant kept her art supplies, clothes, and kitchen supplies. PLaintiff mother has a son and his family living with her, but not the disabled daughter. 

Plaintiff claims dismissed.   Defendant counter claim dismissed. 

Second-

Undisclosed Death (2021)- Plaintiff/tenant/pastor  John Kim suing defendant/leasing agent Kenneth Um for not disclosing a death in the house he rented, fraudulently rented him a house, and plaintiff wants his security deposit back..  Plaintiff claims a burglar stole his paperwork.   Plaintiff claims he paid all of the rent owed, security deposit, and left to do missionary work, and it was a dangerous area.   Plus, plaintiff found out there was a murder-suicide in the home, and not disclosed by defendant (any unnatural death within three years has to be disclosed to prospective buyer, or tenant).      Preacher went to Tuba CIty, AZ for three or four months, but his family of three moved to another home.  Security deposit was $3700, and rent was $3700.  Defendant says he didn't get a rental commission, because plaintiff never paid the security deposit.   Oh no! the "Ate the Steak speech". 

JJ says the 3 year rule is valid in California.   Defendant's fee for renting the house wasn't paid because plaintiff never paid security deposit.    Rent is owing for November and December, $3700 each month.    Plaintiff claims he couldn't get copies of his checks. 

Plaintiff case dismissed, no proof. 

Fresh Mouth Takedown! (2014)- Plaintiff Jessica Reyes suing defendant/ex-boyfriend Andrew Gile, for a loan for car repairs.    Plaintiff says defendant needed his car to deliver newspapers, and needed car parts, so plaintiff paid for the parts.    Plaintiff has AutoZone auto parts purchases on her bank account, and separate purchases for tires. 

Defendant just sassed JJ.     I bet Officer Byrd stopped doing his crossword puzzle.  JJ didn't take sass from defendant very well. 

Plaintiff receives the car repair bills. 

[CrazyInAlabama]

4 p.m. reruns-

First (2018)-

Witness to Vandalism! -Plaintiff  Yolanda Grant is suing defendant /former foster mother Nadine Williams, she's suing defendant for damage to their rented property, and car vandalism.   Hole in wall cost $750 to repair, but plaintiff could only pay $400. 

Plaintiff wife also claims that defendant vandalized her car, when she was leaving after they argued.     Defendant and her 12 year-old child into her home when they needed a place to stay.  Witness for plaintiff is Melissa Murphy, who claims she saw the defendant do the vandalism to the plaintiff's car.   Witness didn't call the police or tell the Grants about what she saw until much later.    

The plaintiff witness calls the defendant plaintiff's aunt, so maybe a family adoption?   

When defendant and daughter moved, they went to a motel.   

$1,000 for the car, and $750 for wall, plaintiff gets $1750.  

Domestic Dispute Ejection?! -Plaintiff Peter and Robin Anderson suing defendant/former live-in of plaintiff wife's mother ,James McGuire., for three months mortgage (half of it)  House defendant and partner lived there together for many years.   Down payment was $25,000 paid by mother, and house was sold later.    Defendant moved out of the house before this case came to court.    

Defendant left because of a restraining order, according to plaintiff.  Defendant only has to pay half of the mortgage for the time he lived in the house.   $851 a month was defendant's half.  When house was sold, plaintiff mother didn't get the $25,000 back.  Defendant says he did a lot to the house, including windows, and he says he paid the mortgage for many years, and paid for all of the improvements.   Plaintiff claims mother paid the first 15 years, and claims the defendant was going to pay the next 15 years. 

Plaintiff says nasty things about the defendant in court, and in the hall-terview. 

JJ tells plaintiff to get the money from her mother.  Plaintiff case dismissed, no contract and no proof. 

Courts Are for Married Folks -Plaintiff/ex Scott Fox is  suing defendant/ex Jill Tapp,return of furniture, moving expenses, and hotel fees.  Plaintiff claims he bought almost all of the furniture, defendant disputes that, neither litigant has real proof of purchases, etc. 

We will get the "courts don't exist to split up unmarried people's pots and pans" , especially without proof.    Defendant admits she sold the weight set bought by plaintiff.  However, no receipts are submitted.

Plaintiff gets his dinette table and chairs, within five days.

Second (2017)-

Bullhorn Craziness Caught on Tape?!-Plaintiff Francis "Stephen" Hesley suing neighbor for false charges, harassment, and property damages.    Defendant Sheila Blazofsky thinks it's normal to exercise your First Amendment right to free speech by screaming filth at plaintiff with a bullhorn.    First incident was defendant was trimming branches on her side of the fence, but trimmings were falling on plaintiff's side of the fence. 

 Plaintiff talked to defendant about picking up the trimmings, and defendant responded with a lot of profanity.   JJ calling them twigs is mean.    This garbage has been going on since 2014.   In 2015 (after defendant's sad story of being ill for years, after being hit by a drunk driver).     After the profane tirade the plaintiff called the police about garbage on plaintiff's yard, and the profanity.   Nothing happened with the police in 2014. 

Plaintiff claims piles of debris are left in his yard by defendant.  Trash piles were larger branches, flip flops, wood, soccer ball.  Video of defendant screaming at plaintiff from the sidewalk with her bullhorn.      Defendant has a filthy mouth.  Police again did nothing, but in many jurisdictions screaming profanity is arrest offense.     (I would not be surprised to find out defendant ends up filing often against others, aka a vexatious litigant). 

Plaintiff is laughing, and trying to act like she's crying.    Then Officer Byrd plays the video of defendant's tirade against plaintiff, with a bull horn. 

Defendant complained about plaintiff to newspapers, mayor, city attorney, and anyone else who couldn't escape her.  JJ is wrong, the defendant dumping stuff in plaintiff's yard is ridiculous, and inexcusable.    (Plaintiff should sell if he wants to have peace, but expect any future buyer to sue him for non-disclosure of the defendant, and her actions).  Plaintiff should have the right to the peaceful enjoyment of property he pays for.   

Cases dismissed.   (This show is dated 2017, so this has been going on for over 3 years, and I'm sure since 2017 it's still happening). 

Sublet Sorrow-  Plaintiff Tannyr Lamica (woman) suing defendant Charly Cadet for unpaid rent on a subleased apartment.    Defendant was leasing a condo, right after he signed the lease, he wanted to move, and found the plaintiff to rent it from August through May, with three more months remaining on the lease.   

Plaintiff said she would take over lease from August through May, and defendant said he would pay the lease in May, June, and July.   However, Charly didn't pay for his last three month the way he promised to.     Defendant wasn't getting an awards letter, and couldn't stay in student housing.

$1233 to plaintiff. 

[DoctorK]

46 minutes ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

JJ is wrong, the defendant dumping stuff in plaintiff's yard is ridiculous, and inexcusable.

Yep, JJ was clearly one sided in this case, the defendant was disturbing the peace, throwing debris over into his yard (JJ says no proof of this - BS, - for preponderance of evidence if they were obviously thrown over the fence from her yard should be enough). She absolutely should have been cited if not arrested for disturbing the peace with her bull horn. Even JJ warned her about getting arrested but JJ obviously had it in for the plaintiff from the beginning, her questions were hostile and provoking, to say nothing of aggressively rude.

[One Tough Cookie]

On 5/27/2021 at 5:50 PM, CrazyInAlabama said:

Defendant gets SS disability, and rents the house, and her brother is paroled to the house.  Rent from defendant is $750, and her disability is $925, and she gets by renting rooms.    The basement is a big open room, and everyone shared the bedroom.  Brother lives in the attic.  Defendant says basement is finished, plaintiff says basement is an unfinished basement, and picture shows a big empty basement. 

Now THOSE are the family I'd like for neighbors.😌  I bet the snake was a better tenant

[CrazyInAlabama]

5 p.m. episodes-

First-

Slum Landlord or Gracious Host?! (2021) -Plaintiff /former tenant Takeisha Davis suing defendant/landlord Safari Sekiyoba, for hotels costs, and security deposit return ($2250).  Plaintiff and her four children were in part of a house owned by defendant, and moved after a murder in front of the house.   Plaintiff also claims there was criminal activity by the front tenants of the house.  Plaintiff's security deposit was $2250, and rent was $2250 for the first month.   

Defendant shows photos of the damages left by plaintiff, and her four children, and whoever else lived there (aren't there always other people that get blamed for damages?).  Damages are the top panel of the front door, plaintiff claims she replaced the entire door.  Plaintiff didn't bring the door receipt with her to court.   Defendant points out tenant was Section 8, so what?    Plaintiff says defendant didn't do a walk through with her , in February 2021.   Plaintiff has move out photos.    Closet door is damaged, and trim is shattered.   Defendant is asked to submit his receipts for damage repairs.   Bill is not itemized for repairs, just one bill is submitted.    Why do landlords come on this show?   

Plaintiff has a lot of pictures, but it only shows dirty walls, nothing with closets, and the wall paint is hideous.   

One of the bedroom windows is missing entirely.   

Plaintiff blames everything on the tenants who rented the front of the house.   If the other tenants were so shady, why did plaintiff give them the keys when she moved out?    Several electrical outlets have been ripped out.   Plaintiff claims the photos are of the front of the house, not her part of the house.   

Defendant says Section 8 paid the security deposit.

Plaintiff, her four kids, and a foster kid live in Lancaster now.    I didn't like either litigant. 

$2250 to plaintiff. 

German Shepherd Scare (2014) -Plaintiff Joanne  Flournoy suing defendant Precious Greer, for damage to plaintiff’s car hood.    There was a loose German Shepherd, and when defendant saw the dog, she jumped on plaintiff’s car hood.  Defendant claims she asked permission to jump on the hood.   Defendant claims she sat on plaintiff's car hood, but plaintiff's fiance who was driving the car at the time, denies that.    Plaintiff fiance says he saw a little kid walking a German Shepherd dog,   Everyone standing around scattered, and defendant jumped on the car hood, and it was badly dented.    

Defendant says she saw the car, and the group around it, asked to sit on the plaintiff's car hood.   JJ points out that defendant isn't tiny, and would damage the car hood.  

$1300 to plaintiff. 

Second-

Missing Money Mystery (2021) -Plaintiffs Lisa Stern suing defendant/landlord Robert Amogeda for her security deposit.  Landlord rented a room to plaintiff, security was $795, and says he sent a check to plaintiff for the security.  Check was never cashed.   Plaintiff gave defendant her sister's address to send the security deposit.    

Defendant sent a MoneyGram from Walmart, sent it certified mail to plaintiff's sister's address.   Deborah DiMiceli is plaintiff's sister, and says she never received a check for the sister.   Defendant received notice from the post office that certified mail was delivered to sister's address, but no certification receipt was received by defendant. 

I wonder if post office didn't deliver non-tenant's mail to someone with another name to plaintiff's apartment mailbox.    MoneyGram was never cashed by plaintiff.   Walmart should be able to tell if MoneyGram was ever cashed.    Plaintiff was only tenant in defendant, and wife's house.   

  Defendant claims plaintiff harassed him, posted flyers with his picture on them around the neighborhood, calling defendant a thief, and saying return my refund.    Defendant case dismissed. 

Plaintiff will receive $790.

Car-Kicking Tantrum (2014) -Plaintiff/driver Scott and (wife and also on car title) Mary Mason  suing defendant  Briana Gomez for a fender bender.   Plaintiff was driving, parked at a parking garage, defendant was driving a rental car, and defendant didn't take a damage waiver.   Defendant claims she was terrified of plaintiff, and plaintiff's little son was there too. 

Defendant was backing into the parking slot next to plaintiff's car, and when plaintiff returned to his car there were two notes, one from Santa Monica Police department.  Plaintiff was cited for parking by backing into the parking space.   Defendant also backed into her space, then a passersby told her not to back into the space, or she would get a ticket, so reversed, and parked front way in.     Defendant is counter suing saying plaintiff threw a tantrum, and kicked her car.    

Defendant says plaintiff started screaming filth at her, in front of another police officer.   So how did other police officer, and plaintiff know she was driving a rental, had no insurance, and hit the plaintiff's car?      

Plaintiff receives $1,096.  Defendant claim dismissed. 

[One Tough Cookie]

On 5/27/2021 at 6:59 PM, CrazyInAlabama said:

Undisclosed Death (2021)- Plaintiff/tenant/pastor  John Kim suing defendant/leasing agent Kenneth Um for not disclosing a death in the house he rented, fraudulently rented him a hou

I kept waiting for  her to-smack her pen down and holler UM IS NOT THE ANSWER  is not the answer!

[One Tough Cookie]

7 minutes ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

 Defendant claims she sat on plaintiff's car hood, but plaintiff's fiance who was driving the car at the time, denies that.   

SORRY--I can't multi quote--anyone tell me how to?  I loved it when JJ told the the defendant she was no TWIGGY!😂

[parrotfeathers]

2 hours ago, One Tough Cookie said:

SORRY--I can't multi quote--anyone tell me how to?  I loved it when JJ told the the defendant she was no TWIGGY!😂

Me too!  She probably doesn't remember who she is.

[Alexis R.]

On 5/25/2021 at 8:50 AM, DoctorK said:

Not just you. The defendant was absolutely in the wrong, but the smirking plaintiff is the neighbor from hell - her explanation that the musics wasn't really loud because even though the music was loud outside the house, you couldn't actually hear the lyrics clearly, just the monstrous thumping of the bass; I have no doubt that the plaintiff's windows were rattling from the music. Spoiled brat with complete contempt for her neighbors.

I was a bit surprised that JJ didn't call the plaintiff out for taking an ambulance to the hospital. Even the hospital visit was probably unnecessary, but the plaintiff certainly didn't require ambulance transport. Calling an ambulance unnecessarily is a bit like dialing 911 for the police when a newspaper carrier throws the newspaper in the flower bed instead of onto the subscriber's porch.  

[patty1h]

Stimulus Check Controversy - I could tell that Amanda Linarte was wearing a wig, but was plaintiff Craig Barbieri wearing a fake beard and mustache combo?  I stared in fascination trying to figure it out -that thing was so luxurious and shiny and perfectly trimmed.  It almost looked like a glued-on weave/beard hybrid. 

[CrazyInAlabama]

4 p.m. reruns-

First (2018)-

Redneck with a Laser Pointer?! -Plaintiff Skylor Foshee suing defendant Garrett Maddox  for ruining her iPhone with a laser pointer.  Plaintiff was doing a Snapchat video, when defendant hit her iPhone with a laser pointer, frying the phone.   (this all happened in Hot Springs, AR).    This is the same device that people have used to blind pilots. The laser is stronger than the little red dot type that cats chase. 

Tyler Waters, defense witness owned the laser, but defendant used the laser on the phone.  Plaintiff has the video she was filming when the laser pointer zapped her phone. 

Why is it almost always an iPhone?   To confirm the plaintiff's and defendant's various stories, JJ will make a phone call.   But as JJ points out, witness and litigant should get their stories straight before coming to court.   Defendant claims plaintiff asked him to do a laser show.   There is no proof of either story, and so JJ tells plaintiff to pay for her own phone. 

Plaintiff receives $0 

Engine Blew?  It’s Up to You! -Plaintiff Darla Rosales suing defendant Lisa Adams, a former friend of her daughter,  for car-lease fees, late fees, and emissions charges.  Plaintiff was leasing a car to defendant.    Charges for lease and insurance were $242 a month, but defendant stopped paying because engine blew on lease car, and plaintiff refused to pay for the engine replacement. 

 Car is in defendant's mother's driveway, and defendant claims plaintiff was told by her to pick up the car.   However, defendant's contract with plaintiff says defendant will keep car in good working order.  

Plaintiff paid the car lease/loan off, because otherwise the lending company would garnish her salary.   

$1547 to plaintiff. and plaintiff can pick car up at defendant's mother's house. 

Second (2017)-

Car Sale Gets Personal! -Plaintiff Keadra O'Neal suing defendant / car dealer Anthony Bowers for repo'ing  a car he sold her, property left in the car, and punitive damages.  Car was repo'd after payments were late, and payments were not even the full amount, and as usual plaintiff has no receipts.    Car was collected at plaintiff's work place.   In retaliation plaintiff called defendant's wife, and alleged that defendant was making sexual advances to her.   Contract says when a payment is 7 days late, car will be repo'd.    Plaintiff only paid $300, not the $600 she was supposed to pay.   Car was purchased from a used car dealership, and she claimed she couldn't find his office to pay the second payment.    

JJ says the $300 plaintiff is out for one payment, and $1100 down, equals a rental.   $1100 has no receipt or bank proof, so it didn't happen.  Defendant says woman paid him $1,000 down, but was over 7 days late for the second payment.    JJ gives plaintiff her $1,000 down back for the car, and throws out plaintiff's phony property claims of what was left in the car.    Plaintiff made a police report about the money in the missing purse, and medication that were supposed to be in the car, and that weren't returned to her.

Defendant claims car was not resold, because it's totaled (he claims car was stolen and totaled by a car thief).    Plaintiff claims car was in perfect condition, and is for sale on the car lot.  Why is plaintiff yelling? 

$1,000 back to plaintiff, for her down payment.    Now we discuss the text plaintiff sent to defendant's wife, that's  dismissed.

Father-to-Be Cheating on Mommy-to-Be?!-Plaintiff Patina Saul suing former boyfriend defendant Hakeem Franklin suing for unrepaid loan for a car, and money taken from her without permission.   Salesman said down payment was $1400 and he had that, but he needed to put down $900 more, so he borrowed it from the plaintiff.    Plaintiff loaned defendant money for a car down payment, $900, but he claims it was a birthday gift.     Meanwhile, defendant's other girlfriend was pregnant, a fact not disclosed to plaintiff.     

In January was the car deal, and a couple of months later he dumped her for his pregnant girlfriend.  A $600 insurance payment came out of plaintiff's account in February.    

Plaintiff gets the $900 loan, and $600 insurance payment, so total is $1500. 

[CrazyInAlabama]

5 p.m. episodes-

First (2021)-

Don’t Hog the Loading Zone! -Plaintiffs Guy and Amy Puglisi are suing defendant  Thomas Griego, for ramming their car with a metal lumber cart at a home improvement store loading area.    The plaintiffs were at the Pro Services' desk side of Lowe's, in Poway, CA.   (This is under the overhang at the back of the store).      Plaintiff parked in a regular parking spot, went into the store to complete his order at the Pro Services' desk, and manager wanted plaintiff to park under the overhang at the loading area.   

Plaintiff was in the loading area, and he saw defendant ram his car three times with the big metal lumber cart he was using.   Defendant claims he's a practicing Buddhist, and wouldn't have damaged the car.   (I've been at Lowe's, there's plenty of room for many cars at once under the overhang. )    An assistant manager told plaintiff husband that someone was hitting his car with a lumber cart, and plaintiff saw the last of four hits from the full lumber cart.   

Why does JJ ask the plaintiff a question, then tell him the answer?    Plaintiff says police wouldn't take a report because it was private property (that is common in many jurisdictions).    Plaintiff heard the defendant tell the police he hit the car deliberately, and it was Lowe's and the plaintiff's fault.    

Defendant had two of the lumber loading carts.   Defendant claims he moved his pickup truck to the loading area, but plaintiff's car was blocking the entire pro entrance (no they weren't, I've been to Lowe's repeatedly and an SUV or truck won't block the entire pro pick up entrance.   

JJ is wrong to harass the plaintiff the way she is.      The plaintiff did what many people shopping at Lowe's do, they park in a regular spot, do their shopping, drive up for pickup where the store personnel tell you to park, they load your stuff, and you leave.   You're not blocking anyone where they tell you to park.   

Defendant claims he never answered the plaintiff saying that defendant had hit his car.

There are two long marks on the bumper and rear quarter panel quarter. 

Estimates are submitted, for $1800.  JJ says put it through plaintiff's insurance, and pay the deductible, and watch his insurance policy rates go up.   

$500 to plaintiff for the deductible, and he will have to claim through his car insurance, while defendant gets away with his vandalism.    (JJ's harassment of the plaintiff was uncalled for, she obviously has no idea of what the loading zone looks like, and how it runs.  Defendant is a jerk, and I bet he does things like this constantly).   

Second-

Stimulus Check Controversy!  (2021)- Plaintiff Craig Barbieri suing defendant Amanda Linarte, over stimulus checks for the children.   They have 50/50 custody, and plaintiff wants half of the stimulus check for the 3 year-old child.    Plaintiff (restaurant manager in Washington) pays child support to defendant (a nurse in Idaho), defendant is on low income housing food stamps, and pending a settlement for a car accident that put her off of work last year.    

Defendant says since it's her year for the dependent child deduction, she should get the entire child stimulus check.      The litigants have a court date pending on support, and custody schedule.  (Is the defendant's hair a wig?)   Support from plaintiff to defendant it's through the state, for $97.

$1250 to plaintiff. 

Lethal Swerving?! (2021) -Plaintiff Brooklyn Fears (female) suing defendant Sean Francis for hitting her parked car, and totaling it.  Defendant claims that it wasn't his fault, even though he was driving, and the other car was legally parked.   

Defendant was speeding around a corner, swerved, and crashed into the plaintiff's vehicle.   Defendant car was insured, but defendant wasn't an insured driver for the car, which is owned by his aunt.   Defendant has no driver's license either.   (Defendant's sworn statement is plaintiff pulled out of her driveway, parked in the middle of the street, and ran in her house, abandoning her car.)

$5,000 to plaintiff

Betrayal of Trust (2014) -Plaintiff Brittany Chasar is suing defendant/ex-roommate Dylan Marshall for return of rent ($1500 for 3 months $500 each month), and for constructive eviction.    Plaintiff left after one month, and wants $1000 back.    Defendant claims plaintiff stole a lot of stuff from the apartment, and it was a betrayal of trust.    Plaintiff never had a key, so every time she needed to get into the apartment, she had to buzz for defendant or another roommate to admit her.   Plaintiff was given a key to the apartment door, but not the outer building door. 

Defendant filed a police report after plaintiff moved out, and claims she was threatening him.     This is a condo, and the condo owner gives out the building and apartment keys, but defendant never asked for another building key for plaintiff. 

The day plaintiff moved out, she noticed a lot of her personal belongings were missing, and she called the police.   There is no plaintiff police report, but a group text between plaintiff, defendant and another roommate about borrowing keys, and other roommate never gave her keys.  

$1,000 to plaintiff. 

[KittyQ]

58 minutes ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

Defendant is a jerk, and I bet he does things like this constantly).   

Then, he says he is a Buddhist and has total control of his emotions. He couldn't even control his mugging expressions during this episode, so I doubt that he was so detached that he didn't act out at the loading dock.

[parrotfeathers]

2 hours ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

(JJ's harassment of the plaintiff was uncalled for, she obviously has no idea of what the loading zone looks like, and how it runs. 

That was a crazy verdict.  She had her mind made up before they even were sworn in.

[Blissfool]

6 hours ago, parrotfeathers said:

That was a crazy verdict.  She had her mind made up before they even were sworn in.

Why was she so adamantly against the plaintiff. I totally understood what he was saying and it sounded like normal practice. There was no one "holding the popcorn line." 🙄 I was hoping that Byrd would chime in. The verdict made me so angry.

[parrotfeathers]

Judge Judy early episodes are now on Pluto TV.  I watched Episode 94 last night.  Gosh things have sure changed since then.   Litigants were interrupting her, talking to each other and having a grand ole time.  She was pretending to be mean but wasn't really.  I guess she figured that out quickly.  Byrd looked so young.

Edited June 1, 2021 by parrotfeathers

[CrazyInAlabama]

4 p.m. reruns-

First (2018)-

Halfway House Flood! -Plaintiff/landlord JimHilgers  suing defendant Ladedra Colvin for breach of contract, damages to rental property, and   Defendant rented two properties for halfway houses for women.   First house held 12 women, $800 a month, and second house (rent to own, sell to defendant after seven years) $750 a month to landlord, that house held  women, the homes were residential areas, but not commercial properties.  . The tenants pay $400 a month to defendant, so $4,000 a month income profit on the first house (minus $800 rent).     Defendant didn't sign the lease purchase agreement, but confirms she agreed to contract with plaintiff for the second house.   However, homes were zoned residential, but operated as halfway/sober living homes, and they are not licensed for that, especially with that number of tenants.    Defendant is licensed to run halfway houses, but the properties were not zoned or licensed. 

Defendant stopped paying plaintiff, and claims house was damaged.     I hope this isn't the "Ate the Steak" story again.    Damages on second house, were claimed to be a basement flood, mold after the flood, coming upstairs.   Plaintiff says washer drain line came loose, but the sump pump took care of it.   However, defendant says basement flooded, to the top of the basement stairs.   

Defendant says her rent went for payments on items that landlord/plaintiff should have fixed.   Electrical problems were fixed by defendant, and plaintiff says he never knew about the issues.   However, there are emails, and texts between litigants mentioning the problems at the house. 

Why didn't defendant take pictures of the massive flood?   I'm not liking either litigant, and think they're maneuvering for the win. 

Both litigants' cases are dismissed.   I just feel sorry for the tenants paying $400 a month to be packed in like sardines.

Painter Misses the Obvious -Plaintiffs April Delaney suing defendants William "Bill" , and   Jennifer Albrecht for them failing to pay her for painting their premises.   $1850 was the price, and job was completed, and plaintiff was paid $2,000.   There was a verbal add on according to plaintiff, but defendant says he didn't want to pay $150 more to remove wall paper.   Plaintiff/painted says she didn't see the wallpaper.   JJ dismisses defendant counter claim, because husband Albrecht keeps shouting out.  

Plaintiff wants additional money, because she claims she had to clean the rooms to paint them.   Plaintiff received $2,000, but wants even more.

Plaintiff case dismissed.  Defendant case dismissed. (I hope defendant wife, and plai

Second (2017)-

Husky Attacks Bichon Frise?! -Plaintiff Steven Shandrow is suing  dog sitter's roommate for vet bills when plaintiff's dog was attacked at defendant's house by roommate's dog. Joshua Blume, is the defendant.   Plaintiff had a dog sitter while they were on vacation.   Plaintiffs were going out of town for two or three weeks.   Dog owner has dog sitter Renee Lewis  as his witness.     

Dog sitter had dog at her house, and boyfriend's roommate had a Husky that attacked the plaintiff's dog.   Boyfriend has a Jack Russell too.   When the roommates were outside on the patio with boyfriend, and his roommate (Husky owner), they didn't bring the dog's outside.   

However, the next time the plaintiff's dog sitter brought the Bichon Frise along, had the Bichon outside with the Husky, and the little dog was attacked.    

I think the plaintiffs should have sued their dog sitter for the dog's injuries.   

In hall-terview the dog owner says it's time to let this go.   

However, I blame the dog sitter for bringing the Bichon to a house with two other dogs.    That is a recipe for disaster.  Plaintiff's should have sued the dog sitter, Renee Lewis, not the defendant.  (Vet bill was over $7,000)

Everything dismissed.

Sick Girlfriend Payback! -Plaintiff Rita Lauderdale is suing her former girlfriend Wendy Cabrera for two months’ rent, and a car loan.  The duo only lived together for about four months.   

Defendant says she was sick, and couldn't pay the rent for two months.    Plaintiff is now living alone in the apartment with her three children from her previous marriage.   As JJ points out when one partner in a relationship gets sick, you take care of each other, you don't sue for rent, and car loans when someone is still sick.   

Car was purchased out of plaintiff's tax refund, they went to the car dealership together, when defendant wasn't working.   Plaintiff went to the dealership to shop for her own car, and defendant saw a car she wanted.   Plaintiff claims defendant promised to pay plaintiff for the car loan when she went back to work.    Defendant was making about $1000 a month, and plaintiff demanded she double up on paying rent, and the car loan added on.  Defendant stayed off work, and helped plaintiff when she got sick and needed help.   

Plaintiff never went back to work after her disability, she's on welfare.     Defendant moved out when relationship ended, and kept car that became a loan, not a gift.  

Defendant says she just wants her car title.     So, car loan dismissed, and everything else dismissed also. 

JJ floors me, she said the car loan will be paid, but not to plaintiff, but to state of Oregon because welfare means you can't have assets. 

Edited June 1, 2021 by CrazyInAlabama

[Carolina Girl]

23 hours ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

The plaintiff did what many people shopping at Lowe's do, they park in a regular spot, do their shopping, drive up for pickup where the store personnel tell you to park, they load your stuff, and you leave. 

Same at Home Depot.  As they're finishing up your transaction, the clerks tell you to go ahead and pull your car up and they'll be right out.  They don't say "wait until we're all finished here, and THEN go get your car and move it into the loading zone. "

I'm starting to get very annoyed at Judge Judy's literal telegraphing to the side she favors of what to say when she calls on them.  Asks leading questions of the litigant she doesn't like and damn if the other side doesn't immediately parrot the "injury" they had.  Smirking plaintiff in the rock case suddenly decided that defendant had been drinking, that she had snotted she had "lived there 20 years" AFTER JJ had elicited that information from defendant.  

It's a good thing it's her last year.  Because she's really becoming a biased old crank.  

[CrazyInAlabama]

5 p.m. episodes-

First (2021)-

Heated Custody Dispute! -Plaintiff Whitney and Roger Kramer are suing defendant /ex Anita Barfoot, (the plaintiff Roger, and Anita never married)  over her vandalizing plaintiff's car, including slashed tires, and bashed windshield.     This was after a lost custody hearing, and plaintiff's car was vandalized.  The older child is 9, and father has had 50/50, and now 100%. 

There was an incident at a custody exchange in a parking lot, defendant didn't have a driver's license but defendant's sister was driving.   Plaintiff wife says defendant's sister had a ticket for driving while suspended, and at the police station (where they exchange the kids),  Sister Elizabeth Hansen claims (defendant's sister) claims she doesn't remember a ticket, and lies about that.   There was a printout that showed defendant sister/witness didn't have a license, and sister keeps saying "I don't remember".   

So, the plaintiffs said they would not hand the children over to an unlicensed driver.   Defendant's license was suspended for a DUI.   

Then on another occasion, defendant texted, and called ex-boyfriend, and didn't get an answer (she gets phone calls to the children on certain times during the week), and she only gets visitation on Sunday afternoon, and evening from 5 to 7.   Visitation was reduced after the DUI, is my guess.   

Plaintiff wife says they own a mechanic's shop, fix up cars, and park the fixed up sale cars, and their own car on this lot when they're working.   The Enclave Buick? was parked there for three weeks, for sale.    The plaintiffs didn't see the vandalism happen.  

Pictures of the Buick SUV show back windshield shattered, all four tires slashed, and front windshield next to their For Sale sign, was smashed.    There was a custody of Jasmine and Riker (parents are Disney and Star Trek fans?) change, and no overnights, sharply reducing the visitation, then the vandalism happened.   The husband / plaintiff submits the text messages to him from defendant.    Then husband texted telling defendant that he will never agree to more visitation for defendant.   

Unfortunately, there is no proof who vandalized the car, (my guess is the sister of defendant).    The police officer helped plaintiffs get a restraining order against defendant and her sister.    TRO or protective order is not finished and approved yet.   Defendant told police "I didn't do it".   As JJ points out there is no proof of who did this, but sister of defendant is sitting there smirking.   Sister of defendant is very short of laughing, and I suspect that we all can guess who did this.  

JJ says when the kids are older, they may object to daddy's rule, and go to live with the mother.    Sorry, I wouldn't have the mother and her awful family around the kids.    Sorry, I disagree, that the mother is a fit parent for the kids to visit.   I wouldn't let any kid around anyone in the mother's family, especially the sister who is the obvious suspect, and won't stop smirking, and giggling.      Are both defendant and her sister / witness stoned in court?    They certainly seem like it. 

Plaintiff case dismissed.  Which JJ tells defendant that this doesn't mean she's innocent of this. 

Second (2014)-

Unleashed Dog Mayhem! -Plaintiff /dog owner Katy Merrick (dog Cody)  suing defendants / dog owners Ariel Seth and Kevin Cottam (dog Diego) for vet bills, after an attack on her tiny dog by defendant's dog. .  Defendant has a German Shepherd dog, plaintiff has four little dogs.   There are cottages, with a fenced common area in the middle.   Plaintiff was in the common area planting something, with her four dogs off leash.   Defendant's GSD is blamed for the attack, however neither defendant saw the attack.   Defendant Seth let her dog out into the common area.    Plaintiff only saw the defendant's dog with Cody the purse dog in Diego's mouth.    Witness Sonia Meza's door faces the plaintiff's house (plaintiff witness couldn't figure out where her front door faces), not the common area.   Defendant Cottam says witness front door faces the street, away from the attack area. 

Plaintiff witness again misplaces her own front door, and could not possibly see the attack from her front door.   All of the dogs were off leash.

Complex owner paid $2800 to plaintiff, and received $1600 forgiven rent for one months, so $4400 from landlord.   Plaintiff claims she didn't have to  sign a release, and didn't pay back the money to landlord.    Vet bill is presented, for both surgeries, and other procedures.  Total was $6700+, and received $4400, already.   Plaintiff is suing defendants for $5,000, because she had to take off work to take care of her dog.  Plaintiff wants travel costs, lost wages.   Plaintiff couldn't afford to keep dog hospitalized for a week, so she stayed off from work for a week, and wants to be paid for that. 

(I think JJ should refuse to pay the plaintiff after she dressed the little dog in a pink dress).

Defendants already gave $619 to plaintiff for bills, landlord gave $4400 too.   JJ asks plaintiff witness Sonja if Diego has ever bitten a dog or person before.   Even SOnja never takes her Chihuahuas in the common area with either litigant. 

Plaintiff receives $1,000.     (I wonder if plaintiff came out after the big dog was already out in the common area?)   

 

 

Edited June 3, 2021 by CrazyInAlabama

[4Sibes Redux]

The streaming app Pluto has a new channel that shows old Judge Judy episodes. It’s channel 158, “Courtroom.”
I’ve been watching episodes from the first season of the show. It’s odd how plain the courtroom is. 

[Carolina Girl]

Another thing about these loan cases is that the judges seem to go after the lender and say "how do you THINK they were going to pay you back?" or "you loaned them additional money!  That's on YOU!"  Why?  People who are borrowing money are in a financial squeeze.  And they hit you with sob stories.  Then you have Judges - especially Judge Judy although Judge Milian and the Hot Bench team do it as well.

Just once I'd like the plaintiff in one of these actions who is getting this response from the judges to say "are you even LISTENING to yourself(ves)?  You are essentially telling this mooching individual over there that they are entitled to free money because I'm someone who has empathy.  That the fact they promised me at the time that payment would come from the tax return/settlement/etc.   When they asked me for a little bit more, I helped them out.  But by all means punish me.  Because I'm the bad guy here and this dirtbag is now entitled to have his debt forgiven because he had a good sob story and a soft touch.  I didn't FORCE this debt on them - they proactively asked for it.  Nice going."

[CrazyInAlabama]

4 p.m. reruns-

First (2018)-

Widow's Cadillac Woes-Plaintiff Toni Tufo tried to sell 2006 DTS to defendant mechanic Richard Resendez.    Defendant mechanic has title to car, and car is at the hotel, and claims he was trying to sell it for plaintiff.   Plaintiff got a duplicate title.   However, defendant has one title with late husband, and plaintiff, with a signed previous title.    How does the late husband sign anything?    Car was towed to mechanic, and hadn't been running, and he fixed it enough to drive to the hotel, for $4,000.    He's trying to sell the car for plaintiff on consignment.     Order prepared for car to be picked up.   Mechanic/defendant gets nothing since he's been using it for a personal car for seven months.   

(My opinion, plaintiff certainly said enough times that she's a widow,  I'm sick of the try to get sympathy because of age, or being widowed.    I think both litigants were shady.     However, if defendant was driving the car as often as the witness says he is, then he's already compensated for the price of the parts for the car.) 

No money for either party, and plaintiff gets her car back.   

Anxious Dog Bites Pet Sitter- Plaintiff /dog sitter Nella Maranon,  is suing the dog owner /defendant June "Melanie" Binkley , because one of plaintiff’s dogs bit pet sitter while she was caring for them.      Defendant left two dogs with pet sitter for two days, on the second day one dog bit the pet sitter, and the defendant was right there.   JJ says it's not necessarily the owner's fault, and I agree. 

(Defendant is wearing purple that matches her hair, and plaintiff also has purple hair.   Will the -next case will be a beat down at the beauty shop between the two litigants?). 

Says the plaintiff assumed some risk when she hired on as a professional pit sitter, and she's also seen the dogs for three years, and saw no aggression from either dog.     Everything isn't someone else's fault.     Defendant keeps interrupting, and is really irritating to the Judge.   Defendant's also doing that bobble head shaking no to everything that's so irritating too.     Plaintiff says one dog gets seizure medication, and the other gets anxiety medication, so I wonder if the anxiety medication to stop biting and aggression?   I suspect the dog has bitten repeatedly, and the defendant is lying about it. 

Plaintiff claims the dog bit someone before, and after this incident, but no proof.     

I really hate that the Dog Park turns out to be property right next to a church, and is just where litigants let their dogs poop.    

I really wish Byrd would take the Fly Swatter of Death over, and beat the defendant until she stops shaking and nodding, and doing fake shocked looks.   

Plaintiff gets nothing.  Defendant still looks like a bobble head.  

Second (2017)-

Robbed by Lover While in Prison?! -Plaintiff /ex-convict Joseph Zientek Jr suing defendant/ex Amy Eddy  for stealing his tax refund, and running up charges on his credit cards, and stole his personal belongings, and his tax refund. Plaintiff was in jail or prison for 16 months.  Defendant also filed his taxes, and took his $2000 refund.  The day of sentencing plaintiff gave everything to defendant, watch, wallet, credit cards, I.D., driver's license, earrings.       Defendant claims she gave "Carl" a friend of plaintiff the watch, and wallet, and another friend picked up the belongings.    Lackawanna, NY is where this happened.   

Defendant used plaintiff's credit cards during the unfortunate incarceration of 16 months, and spent $200 by her testimony.   Plaintiff says the amount was $ , including two trips on one day to buy cigarettes at the Reservation (Why do I think there's a casino there?).  Defendant claims she paid his fine of $500, but it wasn't paid.   

Defendant claims plaintiff told her to spend whatever she wanted on the credit cards, and says plaintiff was going to file for bankruptcy.   However, running up credit cards or other bills in anticipation of bankruptcy is a crime, and credit fraud.   

Defendant claims she withdrew plaintiff's tax refund, at plaintiff's request.     Supplementary reports from prison phone calls is submitted by defendant.   Supplemental report says PIN number was given to defendant, but he claims that was for a prepaid Walmart card.    Defendant doesn't work, but sure lives well.    Plaintiff submits police reports about the thefts.   Some of defendant's purchases were souvenirs from her vacation in Florida.   

Plaintiff receives $5,000

[CrazyInAlabama]

5 p.m. episodes-

First (2021)-

Assisted Living Transformation! -Plaintiff/former tenant George Tateno  suing defendant/landlord Alex Raymundo for his security deposit.    This is a rental house, for $1200 a month, then another tenant moved in, plaintiff's witness is the former roommate, and paid $900, and plaintiff paid defendant $2100 a month. ,   . Defendant gave an August notice to vacate by October 2020.  

Defendant received full rent for August and September, however February 2020, only $1050 was paid by plaintiff Tateno. (for plaintiff and roommate) after construction started to turn home into assisted living facility, and construction lasted for a week.    So for that month, plaintiff only paid half of the rent, $1050, instead of the usual $2100.   

Defendant claims plaintiff only paid half rent in March 2020, and plaintiff has no proof of payment.    Plaintiff claims the shortfall in March was to compensate for the construction in February, because he had already paid February rent before the construction happened.    Defendant says he received $2700 for February and March combined from tenant.    Plaintiff is short $1500 in rent.     Plaintiff and roommate knew when the lease started that the plan was to transform the property into an assisted living facility.      

This is a historic case, JJ sides with a landlord for once!!! 

Defendant did make an agreement with the roommate, to either take half rent for the week, or relocate to a hotel at his expense for the week of construction.   Vyara Christati, the roommate testifies.  Plaintiff and roommate were on the speaker phone with defendant, and roommate claims they could pay half rent the next month.   

The rent was $1500 short, but should have been $1050, and for only one month.    

Plaintiff case dismissed.  Defendant keeps the security deposit. 

Second –

Negligent Craftsman (2021) -Plaintiff/furniture owner  Christine Shanley suing defendant/upholster Daniel Hernandez for not doing a chair to her satisfaction.   Plaintiff wants $1,000 for aggravation, and mental anguish, reupholstery cost for the chair and ottoman, and all of the fees associated with redoing the chair.  Plaintiff bought the chair for several thousands dollars in 2003, from a shop in California.    She used to live in Westchester, CA.   The chair and ottoman were bought together in 2003.    JJ wants a picture of the chair and ottoman in her living room from any time since 2003.    

Price of reupholstering with leather was $550, but after picking up the chair defendant wanted $150 more for refinishing the wood, and she paid $350 down, plus $20 for having someone else pick up the chair from defendant.     Plaintiff hates the chair and ottoman work,   The finished chair doesn't have leather on the seat or ottoman, and plaintiff never paid more than the $350 original deposit.    Plaintiff wants over $4,000 for the chair.

Reupholstery by the second firm, with leather is $2,190.     However, plaintiff tries to get hearsay admitted, but that's not happening.   (I'm shocked that for $370 the plaintiff could get anything done to the chair.    Upholstery prices have been outrageous for years.    Also, for the amount of money the plaintiff wanted to pay, there is no way that the chair and ottoman could be redone in quality leather. )

Plaintiff gets $370 and that's all.   

Mother Mayhem (2014? ) -Plaintiff/daughter Michelle Davis suing defendant/her mother Debbie Malone for ruining her property after plaintiff violated her probation for her DUI.    Plaintiff's husband supports her, between incarcerations, and she can't work because of asthma.    Plaintiff claims when she was jailed, the mother found out, broke into her house, 'tooken' her property (I hate that word, that's not a word).  Plaintiff also left her dog in the house.   Plaintiff was in jail for two weeks, and witness/dog sitter couldn't be here today.    

Defendant says her grandmother told her daughter was in jail, and another kid that was smaller went in through a window, got the dog, so dog wouldn't croak.    Plaintiff has dog back. 

Plaintiff claims mother sent her a letter saying defendant broke into the house.   Plaintiff has no proof. Plaintiff wants damages.

Plaintiff case dismissed. 

Older Cabbie’s Young Roomie (2014) -Plaintiff/landlord Stephen Smith suing Katelyn Carmine defendant/former tenant for unpaid rent.    Plaintiff is a cabbie, who is 60, and he moved defendant, 23 years-old into his apartment, and wants months of unpaid rent.   Between September and March defendant didn't pay rent, and he didn't move to evict her until she had been there for eight months. 

Defendant crashed at plaintiff's place a couple of times, and then he invited her to move in. 

Plaintiff case dismissed, no contract. 

Edited June 3, 2021 by CrazyInAlabama

[One Tough Cookie]

On 6/1/2021 at 6:58 PM, CrazyInAlabama said:

(I think JJ should refuse to pay the plaintiff after she dressed the little dog in a pink dress).

An obvious case of animal cruelty

And today we learned that her honor is an expert in----reupholstering .  She's  insufferable..

[parrotfeathers]

1 hour ago, One Tough Cookie said:

An obvious case of animal cruelty

And today we learned that her honor is an expert in----reupholstering .  She's  insufferable..

But she didn't add that in her lifetime she had sent hundreds of pieces of furniture out for  reupholstering and none of them cost 2100.00 to redo.

[configdotsys]

On 6/2/2021 at 12:21 AM, 4Sibes Redux said:

The streaming app Pluto has a new channel that shows old Judge Judy episodes. It’s channel 158, “Courtroom.”
I’ve been watching episodes from the first season of the show. It’s odd how plain the courtroom is. 

Hmm. I downloaded the app and don't see that channel in there. If I search for JJ it says, "Title not available."

[Carolina Girl]

33 minutes ago, configdotsys said:

Hmm. I downloaded the app and don't see that channel in there. If I search for JJ it says, "Title not available."

I tried to download on my Samsung TV and that channel isn't there either, and the channel numbers all appear to be different, but it is on the app on my iPhone and iPad.  

[VartanFan]

On 6/1/2021 at 6:58 PM, CrazyInAlabama said:

JJ says when the kids are older, they may object to daddy's rule, and go to live with the mother.    Sorry, I wouldn't have the mother and her awful family around the kids.    Sorry, I disagree, that the mother is a fit parent for the kids to visit.  

Plaintiff case dismissed.  Which JJ tells defendant that this doesn't mean she's innocent of this. 

I definitely would have gone with...more likely than not that the D did this.  She doesn’t seem right.  

[CrazyInAlabama]

4 p.m. reruns-

First (2017)-

Security Guards Turned Roommates-Plaintiff Leila Smith rented a room to homeless co-worker Jordan Parker, and is now suing him for threats, unpaid rent.   Rent was $475 a month.   Plaintiff claims on move in defendant paid her half a month's rent, defendant denies this.   Co-worker moved in with two dogs, and girlfriend, into plaintiff's house (she lived alone at the time).     Defendant claims rent was never mentioned to him by plaintiff, and claims plaintiff said he didn't have to worry about the rent.   Plaintiff admits defendant paid her $525.     He owes plaintiff $900 for remaining rent.  

Plaintiff says defendant and fiance,  Kelsey McCoy, damaged tables and other furniture plaintiff let them use.   Table damage looks like the dogs chomped it, not a cat.    Defendant has a Labrador Retriever (girlfriend's dog), and carpets were nailed by dog.    Defendant claims plaintiff had six cats, and only five animals are allowed in the home.   Then defendant brought two dogs in.   So, house had eight animals in a five pet maximum area?  

Defendant claims when he was forced out by the police, he left his uniforms (defendant says the uniforms are military, not the security guard uniforms)  behind, but plaintiff's witness says he saw defendant take the clothes with him when he left.   

$900 for rent, $250 for mattress damage, total is $1150 for plaintiff, defendant case dismissed. 

Excuses Central-Plaintiff Reginald Benjamin suing former tenant/ defendant Jennifer Shealey SSMOF (Sainted Single Mother of Four) for unpaid rent, and stolen appliances (refrigerator and stove)..       

Defendant and her four kids lived in another house (I bet a trailer, since she said it needed to be jacked up and leveled periodically).    Defendant says she moved in to the plaintiff's property with her four children, but claims it wasn't up to her standards.  So, plaintiff paid for defendant and her children to stay in a motel for a weekend before move in.   Plaintiff put them in a motel over the weekend because defendant had a plumber look at the drains, and fix it.     Plaintiff says defendant paid $400 deposit, $850 rent was paid for July only.    

Defendant stayed through August, September, October, and moved out in November.   Defendant claims she only paid $850 in September, but not the other three months.    Plaintiff claims defendant stole stove, and refrigerator on move out, and he has receipts for replacements.   Plaintiff says defendant, and her children actually lived in his home until January, not first part of November. 

Defendant claims she moved out when the house got shot up, and says she has a police report to prove it.  Plaintiff claims he was going to evict defendant, and her kids, after many calls from neighbors of the rental house, telling him about activities going on at his rental house. (Giving the neighbors your contact information is a great idea when you rent a property out).    

Plaintiff says defendant and children actually lived in his home until January, not first part of November.   JJ will confirm actual move in date with apartment landlord.     (If I hear about SSMOF's four kids again, I'm screaming!).   JJ wants to contact landlord of apartment rental (six months and out there too), and apartment landlord says defendant moved in ("Honorable Citizens" is the name of realty company).    My guess is defendant knows exactly who shot the place up, and why.   She didn't mention day care costs for her four young kids, did she?   Wonder if the kids are raising themselves?  

Plaintiff receives $3830 for the rent, and appliances.   

Second (2017)-

When Friends Cut Friends-Plaintiff Dilante Moore suing former friend Randale Brown for cutting him with a knife.      JJ has to threaten defendant that Officer Byrd will put him out through the court exit, if he doesn't stop butting in. 

Both men were getting haircut by plaintiff's witness Damon Sterns (a professional barber).   Both men arrived at the same time of evening.    Both men, plus defendant's girlfriend were hanging out at the barber's home, getting haircuts.   Plaintiff made a joke about political figures, and defendant didn't like the jokes, so defendant cut plaintiff on the arm.  Plaintiff needed surgery to repair his severed arm tendons.    

Defendant says he was working on some clippers,  Then claims plaintiff moved his arm in his way, and caused his own injury.   

$5,000 to plaintiff for his time off work because of his arm injury, and surgery.  (Plaintiff remediates mold and asbestos, so he had to stay off work for quite a while). 

Judge Judy's Big Emergency Account?!-Plaintiff  Karen Dixon is suing her daughter Jaida Vassell for daughter depositing bad checks into a joint account with the mother, and the bank took the money from the mother's other account.    The bad checks amounted to over $4,000. 

 The mother wants the money back, and to know where the money went.    Checks were from defendant's school mate, a Junior, and defendant says she never deposited checks, but was cashing them, and going to meet her phony friends, for half of the cash.   

Defendant Jaida gave her banking information to the scammers, and is so gullible she still thinks she'll get the money back.    Defendant says the banking information went to Joshua, and Lauren.    JJ says mother will have to report this all to the police.   

Mother's account was a side account, for emergencies, that her husband doesn't know about, but he does now.  JJ has a huge emergency account, and it's all hers.  

Defendant gives phone numbers and names to mother for the police report.  Defendant says Joshua deposited the checks, and daughter received $4,000 cash for them, and gave the money to Lauren, and she says they were going to put half back into her account.    Guess what?  They didn't.   

Mother Karen Dixon says she's not putting money in the accounts with the daughter, because young woman is so gullible she'll do it again.   Also, if daughter's friends have the banking account information they can still rob the account.    Now this is a case I wish there was an update on what happened.    

Defendant's friend deposited two checks on the same day, JJ sees the deposit slips.    Since it was a custodial account, the mother got nailed for the money.  Why am I guessing that no one found the scammers, and daughter would fall for the same scheme again?   I bet if the police report was filed, that the investigation showed that the friends didn't exist.    

Plaintiff receives $4250, and will be paid when the police reports about the scammers is received by the court.   At that time the show will pay the award check.  (My guess is Officer Byrd still has his $4250, because the mother didn’t file against the daughter).

[CrazyInAlabama]

5 p.m. episodes-

First (2021)-

Home Owner Association Fraud?! -Plaintiffs  Astghik and Gagik Philipossian suing defendants Robin Weiser, and Harmik Mirsikkanian (spelling?) (HOA board members) for attorney fees to fight a special assessment. Plaintiffs say they had to hire an attorney as the only solution to their problems with defendants.    Plaintiffs bought a condo as an investment, and then the condo board assessed $10k special assessment for each owner, for new doors and windows.  Plaintiffs have never lived in the condo.  Plaintiffs say the person hired to do the window and door replacements was a friend of the board members.   Each side wants their attorney fees from fighting this.   

Plaintiffs prevailed, and each owner can replace their own windows and doors at their own expense, or leave them as is.   Defendants are asked about the number of bids.   After a condo owners' meeting, ballots were sent out, and then condo owners voted on the window and door replacement.    Letter for proposed assessment was sent out to all of the owners, but it was a ballot, not a bill for the assessment.   Then condo owners voted on the window assessment, but the assessment was approved by the voting members.  18 of 23 owners voted for the assessment.      Then plaintiffs hired an attorney.     

The HOA CC&Rs say that replacement of exterior windows and doors for each unit is up to each condo owners.   Plaintiff's attorney said the CC&Rs require all board members to be condo owners, but one was the POA /proxy from his daughter, she's a condo owner, and that's against the rules.    So the vote by the board was invalid.   However, I really feel sorry for the tenant of plaintiffs' condo, if they pay their own utilities for heating, and electricity.  I bet 70's era windows are in very bad shape by now, and inefficient.   After the plaintiffs' attorney sent their letter to the HOA board, defendants' hired an attorney to send their letter.  (I bet the plaintiffs vote down everything about the HOA/condo)   

Plaintiffs receive $3331 for attorney fees. 

Second (2014)-

Deceased Fiance, Family Fight -Plaintiff / mother of defendant's dead brothers two children, Lakeshia Thompson is suing defendants (sister) Charity King, and (brother) Todd King of the deceased fiance, for harassment after plaintiff’s fiance died, and an assault.    Plaintiff says defendants harass her constantly, and keep saying she killed the fiance.  Plaintiff says during visitation by the 9 and 10 year old children of plaintiff, children had voluntary visitation every third weekend with the defendants, that defendants slandered her (said she killed their father), and assaulted her.     Then plaintiff was texted to pick the two children up Sunday evening, (early), by defendant, but plaintiff claims she didn't get the messages, and calls, or voice mails.    Defendant Charity has copies of voice mails, and texts, but not on a phone, and no proof of the texts, phone calls, or voice mails.    Charity King's 'evidence' is just a call log, not a printout of the texts, calls, etc.    

Ms. King, defendant, tries to keep Officer Byrd's sacred ink pen.      The printout does not show the plaintiff's phone number on the Sprint call log.     So plaintiff went to pick up her two kids, (usually at a third party neutral location), instead plaintiff went to defendant's home address on Monday.    

Plaintiff says Ms. King came around the corner of the building, screaming, swearing, at plaintiff, then when daughter got into the car, plaintiff went to buckle the child's seat belt, when defendant woman assaulted her.   Then plaintiff says defendant man assaulted her, tried to choke her, and plaintiff is trying to call 911.     Plaintiff put her second child in the car, and drove to meet police at a safe location.    Plaintiff says defendant man has a long criminal record.   

Police reports are entered into evidence, and there's a supplemental report too.  Police report says plaintiff was going to pick up children on Sunday, but didn't make it until Monday.   D.A. decided not to prosecute the defendants, and claims the plaintiff also misbehaved.   

Defendant woman claims plaintiff assaulted her first.  Defendant woman says she didn't give her home address to plaintiff, because she didn't want the plaintiff at her home.  Plaintiff says defendants made nasty remarks about the children's DNA test, skin color, and claim that plaintiff caused late fiance's death.

As JJ points out, plaintiff's dislike of defendants don't stop her from getting every third weekend without the kids. ( In the hall-terview, plaintiff says her children haven't been near any of the deceased father's family since this happened.    Sometimes, free baby sitting isn't a good idea, especially with people who tell others that you killed your fiance, if you can believe the plaintiff either). 

Plaintiff case dismissed. 

 

Edited June 6, 2021 by CrazyInAlabama

[4Sibes Redux]

JJ is not on Pluto Channel 158 24 hours a day, but she is in it overnight for several hours. 
 

 

[Carolina Girl]

17 hours ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

Why am I guessing that no one found the scammers, and daughter would fall for the same scheme again? 

If you're ever wondering exactly WHO is probably dumb enough to fall for those fake IRS / Social Security  calls where they say you can clean up the problem with Google Play cards, this is the one.  BTW, I read  where some enterprising store managers have literally put signs up at their card kiosks, advising people that no government agency would ever take payment in gift cards.

[CrazyInAlabama]

4 p.m. reruns-

First (2018)-

Here’s the Real Reason We're Not Married-Plaintiff Jennifer Thomson suing defendant/ex Jay Benniefiel over his part of their trailer, vending machine keys, land, and poultry. Cane reliant defendant is getting sued by disability receiving plaintiff.   The love birds had land that she claims she inherited, but yet it was joint title, defendant claims they paid $3700 for the land, so I'm officially confused.  The litigants had a marriage ceremony, but never had a license, or did any paperwork, so they didn't marry.  Plaintiff claims she has a license, but defendant said they never married because plaintiff would lose her disability payments.    Plaintiff's witness gets the Byrd boot in record time, and Officer Byrd almost had to drag her out.   

 She bought a trailer for $12,500 with both names on the title to fix up, and rent as income property.   They also had a flock of chickens, turkeys (who all died, I wonder if it was at Thanksgiving?), pigs, etc. and JJ isn't touching the animal's worth.    The two love birds didn't marry because she would lose her permanent disability benefits.   

They broke up, and he wants his part of the assets, so JJ says sell the land and trailer, and split it.    Then there is the strange dispute over vending machines bought at yard sales, and placed at various businesses, and he wants the key to two, but gets one.    I'm just glad that these two fools didn't reproduce, and inflict their terminal stupidity on another generation.   Trailer is still on plaintiff's property (inherited land).   Good luck selling an older trailer without land.     The separate land will be sold, and profits split 50/50.  There are also three more vending machines.   

No money is awarded, and plaintiff gets one vending machine key.  They're told to sell land and trailer, and split the money.  

Jail Time Buick Blunder-Plaintiff Rodrigo Valencia sold a 2004 Buick Rainier (what the hell is a Buick Rainier?) to defendant, Timothy Whitmore defendant made zero payments, never registered it, and claims he doesn't know where it is.   Tiffany, plaintiff's witness and defendant's sometimes girlfriend, and Timothy Whitmore went to jail at the same time. 

However, Tiffany, the plaintiff's witness, and sometime girlfriend of defendant, still talks to defendant's Mom daily, and discloses that the defendant drove the car to Mom and Stepdad's place yesterday, and Mom says it's still there.     Defendant looks even more clueless than before Tiffany ratted him out.   (I would love to rip the Man Bun off Timothy's head, and watch him cry).  

There is also the matter of tickets on the car by defendant.    Dismissed. 

Plaintiff gets five days to pick up car, and then says he doesn't want it, and JJ tells him to stick that, pick it up, and resell it.   

Home Sale Fail-Slimy real estate agent Jacob  Earnhardt (not a broker, as if JJ or any of us care) for breach of contract, and damaged property.   Agent agreed to sell a house for a defendant Barton Weissman, after doing some fixups, and publicity.    The agreement was that agent would get paid when house sold.   

House didn't sell, so plaintiff gets no money, and is still a loser. 

Second (2018)-

Kindergarten Teacher Abuse- Plaintiff teacher Mytrece Youngblood, moves in with loser boyfriend, defendant Donte Miller.  After mom threw her out, she moved back to mom in December (not for January and February), and then went back to love muffin by March.    Wonder if she's really a kindergarten teacher, or another exaggerated job title?  It sounds like a private daycare.      They had fight over to have, or not have sex, and he told her to leave then.   

She had to take two weeks off of work as a kindergarten teacher because of mental anguish, and went to the hospital.   She stayed in hospital for three days, and by-the-way, she called him to visit her there.    She also told him to take her stuff to her grandparents' place, and he only took some stuff, and  not her beloved makeup collection.     

Plaintiff gets nothing.      I can't stand the sad sack plaintiff.

Horses Grazing Ignorance-Plaintiff Kathryn Ward suing defendant Elliott Noll, because the horses on defendant's rented property (defendant rents his property out, and the tenants has horses) are damaging the fence.  Plaintiff claims the horses are damaging her fence, and that the renter (on defendant's property) doesn’t know how to feed horses properly. 

Plaintiff fenced and cross fenced her three acres, and claims three sides of the fence are intact, and she's blaming the horses' grazing for erosion, fence damage, and everything else.    

Personally, I hate butt-in-skies who know everything about your horses, and think they are the world's greatest expert on your animals. 

Defendant says the fence bottom rolling to allow the horses to graze on plaintiff's property is because of plaintiff's dog digging under, and going on defendant's property.   The fence bottom is rolling towards the defendant's property, from plaintiff's.   That's not from horses eating on defendant's side of the fence.  Plaintiff has a Great Dane. 

If that dog is bothering the horses, know-it-all plaintiff will be responsible for any and all damages, including vet bills for injured horses.   Actually, in every state I've heard of, animals harassing or attacking livestock can be shot.   

Nothing for the plaintiff, and it's exactly what she deserves.

Fiance in Legal Trouble-Plaintiff Jennifer Ware loaned $1900 to defendant Katie Klinger for attorney for a criminal case, for loser boyfriend.   Boyfriend looks like he regularly appears in court.   Are those amateur jailhouse tats on the boyfriend? 

As usual, the defendant calls questions about repayment harassment.     Defendant promised to pay back using tax refund, and boyfriend could get work easily, both lies. 

Plaintiff gets $1900. 

Edited June 4, 2021 by CrazyInAlabama

[CrazyInAlabama]

5 p.m. episodes-

Time Share Nightmare (2021) -Plaintiff Antoinette Harris White suing defendant  Dante Taylor, for money owed on a time-share.   Defendant is counter suing for a false restraining order, and taking money out of his bank account after they broke up.    

Time share was in plaintiff's name, and plaintiff bought time-share in her name, because defendant has bad credit.   They bought the time share, and a month later they moved in together. (Note to JJ, nobody can sell, donate, or gift a time share.   That's why they have time share exit companies.   You also have to pay maintenance fees on it too).    Plaintiff says she can't sell the time share until it's paid off (bull pucky).  

Plaintiff filed for a restraining order against defendant, because he harassed her at work on multiple occasions.   Defendant claims the restraining order was false, and plaintiff lied to get the order.  Plaintiff submits texts she claims are from defendant, but they're a whole lot longer then texts I ever get in one piece.  Protective order never went to court, plaintiff claimed defendant was never served, or went to a hearing. 

Plaintiff took $860 out of the joint account, and the bank reversed it.   Then defendant closed the account, and credit was reversed.

Plaintiff told to sell the time-share, so no money for that.    

Defendant receives $860.  (Now my usual accident and injury attorney commercials, I keep getting time share exit companies.)

Spooked Dog Damages House (2021) -Plaintiff Shane Daly suing defendant Varayut Punyasavatsut for damages from his dog,  and punitive damages for stress.   Plaintiff claims defendant's dog damaged his screen door, and deer fence, during fireworks on Christmas, and 4th of July. 

This was in 2019, and plaintiff sold the house since 2019, and claims he received less money for the house because of the damages from the dog.  Second time the dog ripped the fence patches out from the first occasion, and both times plaintiff fixed the fence.   The plaintiff didn't fix the screen door, but sold the house with the damaged door. .  

Plaintiff case dismissed.  (Why was this case even filed?)

Freeway Crash (2014?) -Plaintiff Fulah Muhammad suing defendant Carl Dale, her fiance's nephew, over damages to her car when defendant drove plaintiff's car, and towing fees.    Defendant claims plaintiff told him she had insurance, when he asked her at 7 a.m. if he could borrow her car.   Now it changes to he asked her to borrow it the afternoon before.  

Interesting take on no insurance.   Plaintiff only has a permit, not a real license, and the last time she drove was to Taco Bell with a cousin with a license in the car.   This doesn't mean you drive a car without insurance.    Car apparently hasn't had insurance for a long time.   Defendant had an accident, totaled the car, and his injuries have healed.   Defendant says another car cut him off on the freeway, he lost control and hit a pole, rear end first.   

Plaintiff $1400. 

Second (2014)-

Assault or Self-Inflicted Injuries? -Plaintiff Kelicia Pitts  suing defendant/ex boyfriend  Darnell Monts  for an assault, and false arrest.   Plaintiff claims she was arrested because defendant lied to police, and wants bail, loss of tuition because she had to drop out of school.   

Plaintiff claims boyfriend attacked her, and she ran naked from the apartment to escape him.  Boyfriend says he had stitches and staples in his head after she attacked an hit him.     Plaintiff claims boyfriend stole her camera when he left, but he denies knowing where her camera is.   

They went to plaintiff's apartment, started arguing, plaintiff claims defendant was jealous of her talking to another man at an event for her school they had just attended.   Plaintiff claims defendant grabbed her, shook her, pushed her, shoved her, and she tried to escape him.   Plaintiff claims defendant was chasing her, so she ran out of her apartment, into the hall naked, and needed a cell phone to call police.   

Ran to neighbor's apartment naked, to borrow neighbor's cell phone.       Plaintiff claims neighbor wouldn't let her in, gave her a cell phone, and she went back to the apartment with the phone.   Plaintiff claims she left the apartment naked, in fear for her life, but went back there anyway.   She went into her apartment, threw defendant's shoes out the window, to get defendant to leave (no, makes no sense to me either).    So plaintiff calls 911, puts on something to cover herself, claims the assault continued,  (So someone gives her a cell phone, but doesn't throw her a blanket or something to cover herself?  Garbage). 

Plaintiff claims he damaged her computer, but defendant's paying for it already.    Defendant left the apartment.   Plaintiff claims police did nothing, didn't take a report, and claims they didn't come upstairs and talk to plaintiff.    Plaintiff says defendant lied to police, claiming she was the aggressor.   

Defendant claims she attacked him, cutting his head, and hand,  and he never assaulted her.  Plaintiff claims Darnell tossed the computer through the window, and used a piece of glass to cut himself, and when police came back again they saw the blood on defendant, and arrested plaintiff. 

Defendant claims argument was about another woman he had dated for an extremely short time, and after that plaintiff attacked him.   Defendant says plaintiff attacked him, and he grabbed her hands to stop her from hitting him, and then she opened the window tossed his clothes and shoes outside (apartment was on the fourth floor).   Then plaintiff hit him, he thinks with a metal ruler, and that's when he started bleeding.   The injuries are in the medical report, but plaintiff has the police report. 

Plaintiff case dismissed.  

(I remember this case.    I've never typed the work 'Naked' so many times in my entire life, as I did in this case).  

[One Tough Cookie]

On 6/3/2021 at 6:58 PM, CrazyInAlabama said:

Deceased Fiance, Family Fight -Plaintiff / mother of defendant's dead brothers two children, Lakeshia Thompson is suing defendants (sister) Charity King, and 

I will say this--Lakishia had gorgeous  skin!--yeah, I am superficial!

[Carolina Girl]

Plaintiff in Fiancé in legal trouble case was snookered. She’s come into money and by some crazy coincidence, smarmy defendant and smarmier fiancé just learn that night  she”s visiting that Oh my GOD! He could lose his job and they need a lawyer quickly.  Wouldn’t surprise me if they staged the whole thing.  Defendant never intended to pay her back for sure.   Grifters like these two believe that if you come into money, they are deserving of part of it.  I’ll wager these two probably tried this with several people before plaintiff showed up.  

[parrotfeathers]

12 hours ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

Plaintiff case dismissed.  

(I remember this case.    I've never typed the work 'Naked' so many times in my entire life, as I did in this case). 

He could be a really good liar but I believed him.

[CrazyInAlabama]

4 p.m. episodes-

First (2018) –

College Teacher’s DUI Drama!- Plaintiff Nickolas Neeb suing former girlfriend/Community college English teacher Brandy Opse.   When she gets busted for DUI, and gets bailed out by boyfriend, Nic for $1,000, plus $2500+ for the lawyer, and also loaned her several thousand dollars, and she only paid back $3k.     

Don't see the attraction Nick Neeb had for Brandy Opse (unusual names, I don't believe I ever heard either of them before, except on this show).    The bond and lawyer were after they broke up.     

Brandy seemed about to fall down at the defendant's table.   I wish she would stop weaving around at the defense table, it's making me dizzy. 

Plaintiff gets $5,000.

Haunted Police Payday-Plaintiff  Stacey Magovern (this is the right spelling of her last name) suing defendant Richard Norton Jr for not paying for her security service to work at the haunted house.  Defendant trying to look innocent, and honest in court isn't working for JJ or for me either.   

Defendant turned an escape house into a Haunted House for October, and claims the security firm that worked for him did it for free, in hopes of getting next year's business.    Even I don't believe that, and since the security people included off duty police officers, he should have paid his bill.     I don't think any of those officers will ever give him a warning instead of a ticket in return for his promise to do better, because he's a total liar.   

 $2080 to plaintiff.  

Second (2017) –

Worms Coming Up Through Drain?!-Plaintiffs / former tenants James Glass and girlfriend Veronica Ortiz are suing former landlords David and Melissa Dempsey (Her mother is the actual owner) and for return of rent, security deposit, and harassment.     Plaintiffs paid first month's rent, and security deposit to defendants, with a written lease (defendants brought lease copy). 

 Defendant mother, the owner of property, can't fly (Sorry JJ, some people can't fly for physical reasons).     Plaintiffs saw the home before move in, (Jersey City, NJ), and claim defendants would put in new appliances, and shower, window security bars, and a cabinet or two.  Plaintiffs only lived there a month. 

Plaintiffs claim shower flaked paint, that jammed drain, and worms came out of the drain (plumber says it was pasta spaghetti, not worms).   Defendants claim plaintiffs were in the apartment more than a month, and flooring was new before plaintiffs moved in.   

Defendants had plaintiffs evicted in June, by housing court.   Plaintiffs claims they moved in April, voluntarily.   Defendants say the closets, refrigerator, kitchen were full of garbage. 

Plaintiffs claim they stayed in motels from April through June, because they were afraid of defendant woman.   The owner/defendant's mother actually lives in part of the house.  (I'm sure I saw this before, probably a couple of times, but the plaintiffs look very familiar.   I wonder if they're on other shows too?).  

By the way JJ, people buy all new furniture on payment plans, or rent to own, then move leaving everything behind, or take everything with them, and leave no forwarding address.   They also get a house hold full of rent to own furniture, get it delivered to an empty house that they claim they're moving into, and then sell it, but they never lived there at all.     

Defendant/landlords also say the plaintiffs smoked pot every day in the house, and the lease says smoke free environment.     Also, plaintiff woman has a 3-year-old asthmatic child they were smoking pot right next to.    

Defendant also say plaintiff woman wanted a different lease leaving the plaintiff boyfriend's name off the lease, in plaintiff woman's name only, to defraud the welfare department.  Why is JJ going to reward welfare cheats?   (The worms coming out of the jammed shower drain is the dumbest thing I've heard in a long time). 

$850 to defendants, (this is for 2 months rent, minus the security deposit).  

[One Tough Cookie]

On 5/31/2021 at 5:43 PM, CrazyInAlabama said:

Redneck with a Laser Pointer?! -Plaintiff Skylor Foshee suing defendant Garrett Maddox  for ruining her iPhone with a laser pointer.  Plaintiff was doing a Snapchat video, when defendant hit her iPhone with a laser pointer, frying the phone.   (this all happened in Hot Springs, AR).    This is the same device that people have used to blind pilots. The laser is stronger than the little red dot type that cats chase. 

I honestly think that a laser like that should be classified as a weapon and be confiscated.  What kind of moron thinks it's OK to use something that  could bring down a plane.....

[CrazyInAlabama]

5 p.m. episodes-

First –

Ungrateful Ex-Girlfriend?! (2021) -Plaintiff /ex-boyfriend Wesley Sinnathamby suing defendant/ex-girlfriend Catalina Baeza for parking tickets, and car damage insurance deductibles .   Litigants were dating, defendant needed a car, no credit, loan was all in plaintiff's name, and registration.   Then, they broke up, and defendant took car on the condition she would pay insurance, and registration on the car.    Car dealer wouldn't even put defendant's name on title, loan or anything else. 

Plaintiff took the car back (repo), with the help of law enforcement, after two years of making only a few payments, and making some insurance payments.   Defendant racked up some traffic tickets.   JJ tells plaintiff to sell the car, to get his money back.   

Plaintiff can't re-register the car unless he pays the tickets off.   However, plaintiff says the car has damages, and tickets were while defendant was driving the car.   JJ tells plaintiff to sell the car, and then sue defendant for the shortfall on the car sale price.    Insurance company called plaintiff about repeated claims. 

JJ will consider the parking tickets, which are in several jurisdictions in the L.A. area.   Plaintiff had to pay the tickets to get the car re-registered to sell the car. 

Plaintiff receives $783 for the parking tickets.

Porched Possessions Upset (2014) -Plaintiff Sonya Lovejoy suing defendant Randy Ward over possessions stored in a trailer defendant owns.    When they separated, and plaintiff moved to Idaho, defendant told her that he was selling the trailer, and gave her a time to get the stuff out of the trailer (he only gave her three days).   

JJ is upset that defendant didn't give plaintiff more time, but she had moved to Idaho six months before this happened.  Defendant says 7 or 8 boxes, but plaintiff claims a dining table set, big screen TV.  

Defendant lives four hours away from where the trailer was, and put the stuff out on the porch, and when plaintiff and movers showed up to get the stuff it was gone. 

JJ is accusing defendant of trashing plaintiff's stuff, and lying about storing it.  

$2,000 to plaintiff.

Second (2014)-

Kicked in the Buttocks! -Plaintiff Myriam Ward  suing defendant Maricela Brown for having plaintiff arrested for assault.   However, plaintiff's now husband  Michael Armijo, was a neighbor of defendant. defendant says she dated plaintiff husband, but husband denies dating defendant.     

 Plaintiff wife and now husband were arguing, at plaintiff husband's home, and  neighbor saw Michael Armijo kick plaintiff wife in the ass.   Then both litigants fell down, and then plaintiff wife/fiancee left.     Mr. Armijo was worried that wife would call the police, so he called first, told police about the fight with his fiancee, and claims she attacked him. 

Plaintiff wife claims defendant made a false statement to police about the altercation, and she blames defendant for the arrest, not the man who kicked her ass that she later married.   

Plaintiff statement says one kick in the ass, and then another assault after that. 

Defendant only dated man after the arrest of plaintiff wife / fiance.   Defendant says plaintiff fiance/husband came to her house for First Aid after the assault. 

Plaintiff case dismissed. 

Archer Denies Shoot-Up! -Plaintiff Peggy Powers suing  Aaron (father and property owner) and Corey Muth (son and archer) defendants for shooting an arrow through her car roof, Plaintiff is suing son Corey for shooting the arrow, and father Aaron for owning the land the arrow was shot from.   

Defendant denies he's missing any arrows.   Plaintiff says defendant son was practicing archery, when the car arrow hit happened.   There are no other archers within shooting distance of plaintiff's car.    Defendant archer wasn't shooting from his father's property, but on a close neighbor of defendant archer.   The picture shows the arrow almost vertical, through the car. 

Plaintiff receives $850. 

[parrotfeathers]

1 hour ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

Plaintiff /ex-boyfriend Wesley Sinnathamby suing defendant/ex-girlfriend Catalina Baeza for parking tickets, and car damage insurance deductibles .   Litigants were dating, defendant needed a car, no credit, loan was all in plaintiff's name, and registration.   Then, they broke up, and defendant took car on the condition she would pay insurance, and registration on the car.    Car dealer wouldn't even put defendant's name on title, loan or anything else. 

I can see how a man could fall for her, especially if he liked the "needy" type.  She didn't lie at least.  Even admitted she parked in places she shouldn't.

[Hellohappylife]

Ms. Catalina gave me the creeps, like one of those women you see on Snapped… 

Her voice, Lashes, Lips, made her look like a Kylie Jenner Wannabe, except for the acne scars.