All Episodes Talk: All Rise

[Brattinella]

1 hour ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

Egged House Payback-Plaintiff's house was egged by entitled twits, and JJ says $600 will cover the damage.   Wrong, the vinyl siding will have to be replaced, and good luck getting it to match.    This girl should have had major charges, and some jail time.   Bet she still pulls this garbage, and destroys what other people own. This little vandal is standing there smirking, next to her enabler father who can barely stop himself from laughing out loud at the plaintiff's damage.  JJ refuses to let the woman get money for replacing the door, and siding.   $250 for plaintiff, and that is ridiculous. 

This one again made me so enraged I could barely speak.  JJ has a heart of stone, and I wish her Jag or her Range Rover gets egged and sat in the sun for days.  WTF did she have against the plaintiff?  Why didn't she deserve to be made whole?

[CrazyInAlabama]

As I recall, the egging happened in the middle of the night.     Why would anyone be expected to go outside in the middle of the night, and trying to fix vandalism that the entitled idiot 16 year old did, and her loser father was just fine with it too?    

The plaintiff should have had the door or glass replaced, and siding fixed, and porch painted, and then presented the bill to her royal jerkiness.     For some reason, JJ really disliked the woman.   

Edited August 24, 2019 by CrazyInAlabama

[Byrd is the Word]

19 hours ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

Egged House Payback-Plaintiff's house was egged by entitled twits, and JJ says $600 will cover the damage.   Wrong, the vinyl siding will have to be replaced, and good luck getting it to match.    This girl should have had major charges, and some jail time.   Bet she still pulls this garbage, and destroys what other people own. This little vandal is standing there smirking, next to her enabler father who can barely stop himself from laughing out loud at the plaintiff's damage.  JJ refuses to let the woman get money for replacing the door, and siding.   $250 for plaintiff, and that is ridiculous

JJ actually had the audacity to suggest the plaintiff was negligent (her actual word) because she didn’t throughly hose and scrub her vandalized property in the middle of the night and went to work instead. Which the plaintiff did not do, by the way. Clearly the calm, reasonable woman had no particular axe to grind and simply wanted her property restored to the way it was before Daddy’s little angel wrecked it. I would have awarded the plaintiff twice the $250 judgement just for the bother of having to deal with that hassle at 2am. Outrageous decision. Top 5 worst ever. 

Edited August 24, 2019 by Byrd is the Word

[Byrd is the Word]

17 hours ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

For some reason, JJ really disliked the woman.

Her attitude made me wonder if a different nurse had somehow botched JJ’s regular Botox treatment that morning. Watching HTH coddle that spoiled little shit teenage defendant was a 180 departure from her normal treatment of teenage vandals. I’d want to scrub my egged door with the face of her smirking father. The entire case was horrible to watch. 

[Byrd is the Word]

19 hours ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

I Won't Rat Out a Friend

This squishy, doughboy man-child defendant won’t “through a buddy under the bus” but he’ll let a descent single mother twist in the wind with a damaged car with nobody held responsible.  That’s an unmitigated douchebag right there folks. 

[AngelaHunter]

2 hours ago, Byrd is the Word said:

This squishy, doughboy man-child defendant won’t “through a buddy under the bus”

Hey, he strictly adheres to his code of honour in his vast criminal organization. 🤣 R-E-S-P-E-C-T, man!

[AngelaHunter]

Just watched the dough-boy, who found some pathetic little mutt who wanted to carry the fruit of his loins. Best part is when he said, while JJ was reading his texts, "May I cross-examinate?" No, you may not, you silly douchebag haired twerp. Who do you think you are - Clarence Darrow?

So, I'm a 41-year old student and SSMOT, since my goony, loser hubby-boo started banging my smirky, 20-something cousin. Hubby likes to keep it all the family I guess. I work one day a week as a server, so what I thought was a grand idea was to not only get myself a 775$ phone (oh, those gotta-have phones!) but to get one for my cousin, who had no place to live, a broken-down car and no money. I can pay the phone bill with my tips and my cousin will keep paying her share, of course. What could go wrong? Sounds good to me.

I don't remember the slow-thinking, wall-eyed Eboni, who started popping out kids with the def when she was 16 or so. I guess she felt she had to hurry, since her baby daddy, Barry, has been in and out of prison so often - or as he called it, "Involved with the justice system" -  he never had time to get a driver's license, not that this detail ever stopped Barry from driving, no sir. Eboni still feels he's a perfect sperm donor since the new kid is only 4 months old.  He ain't got no license, because, in Illinoise, they suspend your non-existent license if you drive with no license or something. I'm glad we didn't have to hear a recitation of Barry's criminal activities. It might have consumed the entire 1/2 hour.

[CrazyInAlabama]

3 p.m. reruns, usually from 2016-

First-

Sexy Pics of an Ex-Plaintiff (in court with grandmother, who thinks because defendant wasn't a virgin she was asking to have the photos broadcast), grandma is suing defendant parents for iPhone and laptop.    Defendant is accused of blackmailing his 15-year-old ex-girlfriend with intimate photos.  Plaintiff is 19, (was 17) and defendant is 17 (was 15).    Defendant was loaned or given grandma's laptop by plaintiff, when parents took hers away, when she sold it for $200.  Laptop was 2011 model, and now 5 years old if this case is 2016.  Grandma gets $900 for computer.   ($900 taken back by JJ, because plaintiff grandmother simply won't shut up).   

Grandson is asked if he took sexy pictures of his 15 year old girlfriend with a previous phone, and put on the iPhone.   Grandson was 18 at the time, sexting big no-no.   Previous phone was confiscated by police, but he already had an iPhone with the naughty photos on it also.   When the two love birds broke up, she took his iPhone, and left with it.   (Sorry, but that's the oldest 17 year old I've seen in a long time).   Defendant's version is that when she was breaking up with him, he scrolled through the phone showing her the pictures, implied that breaking up with him would have repercussions, and so she took his phone and left.   Grandma thinks it's important that grandson plead guilty, but wasn't put on the sex offender registry (I think that's a new low, even for our litigants).   

(Plaintiffs and defendants switch places for the next case)

False Arrest and Compromising Photos-Defendant 17 year old from last case says she was falsely arrested for stealing plaintiff grandson's iPhone, when he tried to blackmail her with the photos taken when she was 15.  False arrest case dismissed.   iPhone was returned.    False arrest case dismissed, and nothing for iPhone to nasty grandma.  

Second-

Vegas Birthday Fail-Plaintiff older sister, suing younger sister for her part of a trip to Vegas, (unpaid loan, and damage to rental car).   Then defendant's phone goes off in court.  Plaintiff loaned rent money to younger sister, $200 (younger sister says it was to repay an older loan).  Older sister rented a car, because younger sister's car wasn't up to the trip.   Older sister was charged for unfilled gas tank, and because sister smoked in the rental car.   However, as JJ said, you have to be 25 to drive rental car, and younger sister was only 24.  $200 for plaintiff, for loan, everything else dismissed.

Puppy Takes a Bad Fall-Plaintiff suing neighbor for vet bills, after defendant was puppy sitting, and dog was injured.  Plaintiff and defendant's kids were together, and puppy was injured by falling off the bed.  Plaintiff can pay her own vet bill.   

Rookie Driver Mistake-Defendant had license for only two days, was driving and put on right turn blinker, but changed her mind, and turned left, hitting the plaintiff's car.     Why is this case even in court?    It's obvious who hit who, who was wrong, and who should pay.   Defendant is counter claiming for car damages.    (I love the matching shirts on plaintiff, and his witness).   Plaintiff has full coverage insurance, and defendant only had liability, but novice driver was not listed on the policy.    Plaintiff's car was totaled by insurance, but there was a short fall in payment v. car value.   Defendant father still thinks that he should get paid for his daughter's bad driving.    Plaintiff gets the money.  

Edited August 26, 2019 by CrazyInAlabama

[CrazyInAlabama]

5 p.m. episodes, Both are New!-

First-

Reign of Homeless Terror-Plaintiff, a 19 year old homeowner says her 53-year-old tenant jumped her over a Wi-Fi dispute, and tenant says she was a slumlord with 22 city violations (Let me guess who called every single one in to the city? And didn't pay rent either I'm guessing).   Son of tenant is friend of plaintiff from work, and says tenant and son were homeless, so they agreed to rent a bedroom for $400, plus utilities.   Tenant son was there for two months, but 16 year old son of tenant lived there the entire time.   Tenants were there from June to December paying rent, but there is no proof they paid the full rent.   November and December were unpaid so $800 to plaintiff.    

Fight occurred in November (month one of no rent), after Wi-Fi was cut off by landlady, during the middle of GTA play by 16 year old.    However, there is no proof the landlady cut anything off.   Plaintiff was on phone with 911, and has audio file in court.   Defendant has video "of the reign of terror from landlady".    Tenant claims being homeless wasn't her own fault, but the landlady was somehow responsible.   $4500 to plaintiff.  

(I'm mean, I enjoyed the fake crying of the defendant in the hall-terview.   I also sounded like my mother during the hall-terview, and wanted to give the loathsome tenant something to cry about).

Second-

Intimate and Incarcerated-Plaintiff gave defendant $1400 on his release from prison, and now wants it back.    Sorry, he was 'incarcerated', previous time in slammer was two years or so before.   Incarcerated person says it was a gift, not a loan.  $1400 to plaintiff. 

Daughter Sideswipe? Mother Money Gripe-Plaintiff suing mechanic for damage to car, her daughter was driving.     Plaintiff had a $250 deductible, and mechanic said he would try to work with her so the deducible would be less, more damage was found, and adjuster paid a total of $4,000+.      Car has yellow spots in the paint, and plaintiff wants money to repaint the car.  $1544 to plaintiff.   

Edited August 26, 2019 by CrazyInAlabama

[Florinaldo]

2 hours ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

Reign of Homeless Terror

The defendant claimed plaintiff slapped her. I was tempted to slap her fake Mater Dolorosa face. And for good measure I would also have slapped that audience member behind her, left-hand side of the screen, who kept shaking her head for inexplicable reasons.

The defendant and her smug arrogant son (with blonde hair braids that looked like strange growths) were the most loathsome litigants in quite some time, playing the victim card (while vigorously affirming they are not) and expecting the landlord to provide for them. She said she lived in squalor with a slumlord? No, she chose to live and remain there rent-free as long as she could for the last portion of her stay.

I hope the plaintiff learned a good lesson and will not make the same mistake again.

Edited August 27, 2019 by Florinaldo

[AngelaHunter]

1 hour ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

 Defendant has video "of the reign of terror from landlady". 

Oh, lawdy! Can't wait to get to this.

ETA: And this:

Quote

The defendant and her smug arrogant son (with blonde hair braids that looked like strange growths) were the most loathsome litigants in quite some time

Edited August 27, 2019 by AngelaHunter

[AngelaHunter]

3 hours ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

Intimate and Incarcerated-Plaintiff gave defendant $1400 on his release from prison

Wendy Shabazz and Jerone? Not even central casting could provide characters like them. Jerone likes to commit crimes and get incarcerated. I guess Ms. Shabazz was in dire need of a little slap 'n tickle and Jerone's criminal ways didn't bother her, so she gave him 1400$ "to get on his feet." after his latest stint in the slammer.  I guess to work off the 1400$, Jerone consents to jump her bones that night. However, according to him, "It was not pleasurable because of the smell." Yes, he actually said that, and this is someone who seems to spend a lot of time in jails where I'm sure the environment is less than fragrant.

Wendy, WTH?? You smell so bad that not even a super loser like Jerone wants a rematch? I guess Wendy didn't think much of his prowess in bed, or Jerone declined to provide any more stud service since Ms. Shabazz now wants her 1400$ back. I don't know how she expected to get it, since Jerone proclaims he has no intention of working. He was diagnosed with MS and is now adjusting to a new way of living. So he has his useless ass parked on his working mother's sofa (his mother also has to care for his daughter) checking out FB and maybe doing a few nefarious deeds on the side - how is that new or any different from his life pre-diagnosis? Neither of them could shut up for one goddam minute and Jerone's stream of consciousness blether and Wendy's "He's a liar! He's lying! He's a narcissist!" interjections made me feel like puncturing my one good eardrum. JJ chastises Jerone for being a parasitic oxygen thief, and Wendy stands there with a big horsey grin, but I don't know why. SHE'S the one who was willing to give Jerone all that money and wanted to bed him. If that were me I'd be shrivelling with shame, not laughing it up.

I wanted to watch the terrorist landlady, but after "The Sordid Story of Wendy and Jerone" I feel I've had enough tv for tonight.

[SRTouch]

8 hours ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

5 p.m. episodes, Both are New!-

Alas, DIRECTV is still fussing with my JJ provider. .... no JJ since July 4th😢😢😢

[Byrd is the Word]

15 hours ago, Florinaldo said:

The defendant and her smug arrogant son (with blonde hair braids that looked like strange growths) were the most loathsome litigants in quite some time, playing the victim card (while vigorously affirming they are not) and expecting the landlord to provide for them. She said she lived in squalor with a slumlord? No, she chose to live and remain there rent-free as long as she could for the last portion of her stay.

The mouthy son with the hostile attitude at first looked like a whirlybird who’s head was going to start spinning for a vertical takeoff. After that all I could think of was Side Show Bob of Simpsons fame.

JJ used the old “you ate the steak” analogy on the clueless squatter. I definitely could have done without the woman’s maggot covered steak retort 10 minutes before dinner. Never mind the fact that nobody would eat the maggoty steak, thus proving the point.  The woman is simply a professional victim. Extra points for the crocodile tears, by the way. Nice touch.

But my bottom line is that I find it impossible to either sympathize or empathize with anyone who rents a room in their home to a homeless woman with two grown kids. It was a play for cash (certainly government cash) that blew up in her face. 

Edited August 27, 2019 by Byrd is the Word

[khyber]

2 hours ago, Byrd is the Word said:

The mouthy son with the hostile attitude at first looked like a whirlybird who’s head was going to start spinning for a vertical takeoff. After that all I could think of was Side Show Bob of Simpsons fame.

When I saw him I said to Mr. Khyber, "This kid's got helicopter hair".  Didn't think of Side Show Bob, but that's very close too.

[funky-rat]

The "odor" comment was likely a cop-out.  It was used on a past season of "90 Day Fiance", where a professional scammer hooked up with a homely, clueless, idiot woman.  They did the deed (perhaps only once - can't remember, and don't want to re-visit it), and he clamed he never wanted to do it again because she had offensive odor, and refused to see the doctor, and that was one reason he left her.  In reality, he managed to take one for the team so they could say the marraige was consummated, and then he took off.  Scammers gonna scam.

[galaxychaser]

13 hours ago, AngelaHunter said:

Wendy Shabazz and Jerone? Not even central casting could provide characters like them. Jerone likes to commit crimes and get incarcerated. I guess Ms. Shabazz was in dire need of a little slap 'n tickle and Jerone's criminal ways didn't bother her, so she gave him 1400$ "to get on his feet." after his latest stint in the slammer.  I guess to work off the 1400$, Jerone consents to jump her bones that night. However, according to him, "It was not pleasurable because of the smell." Yes, he actually said that, and this is someone who seems to spend a lot of time in jails where I'm sure the environment is less than fragrant.

Wendy, WTH?? You smell so bad that not even a super loser like Jerone wants a rematch? I guess Wendy didn't think much of his prowess in bed, or Jerone declined to provide any more stud service since Ms. Shabazz now wants her 1400$ back. I don't know how she expected to get it, since Jerone proclaims he has no intention of working. He was diagnosed with MS and is now adjusting to a new way of living. So he has his useless ass parked on his working mother's sofa (his mother also has to care for his daughter) checking out FB and maybe doing a few nefarious deeds on the side - how is that new or any different from his life pre-diagnosis? Neither of them could shut up for one goddam minute and Jerone's stream of consciousness blether and Wendy's "He's a liar! He's lying! He's a narcissist!" interjections made me feel like puncturing my one good eardrum. JJ chastises Jerone for being a parasitic oxygen thief, and Wendy stands there with a big horsey grin, but I don't know why. SHE'S the one who was willing to give Jerone all that money and wanted to bed him. If that were me I'd be shrivelling with shame, not laughing it up.

I wanted to watch the terrorist landlady, but after "The Sordid Story of Wendy and Jerone" I feel I've had enough tv for tonight.

Because of the smell. 🤣🤣🤣 I died. 

She couldn’t wash her bits before sex? Gross 🤣.

[AngelaHunter]

2 hours ago, galaxychaser said:

She couldn’t wash her bits before sex? Gross

I don't know what she didn't wash, but judging by her hair which looked as though it might cause an oil slick if someone tossed her off a boat, I really don't want to know. Should have put a clothespin on your sniffer, Jerone. Maybe you could have scored another 1400$, or maybe even a car!

[patty1h]

New shows!  Woohoo!   I'm liking JJ's slight adaptation to her hairstyle - the side sweep softens her face.

I watched the case with the Yorkie attacked by a mini Rottweiller.  The case was typical, but I was very entertained by defendant Michael Petrella's hair, staring eyes, tats and nasty toothless situation.  That gob looked like an exploded Whoopie cushion.

Edited August 27, 2019 by patty1h

[CrazyInAlabama]

3 p.m. episodes, both reruns, probably from 2016-

First-

Drinking Buddy Trouble- Plaintiff and her father are suing former neighbor defendant and his father,  for breaking into her home.    Son and daughter are both drunks, and were drinking buddies.   Both litigants (the son and daughter) seem to be rather impaired in court.  Plaintiff claimed to be sober since 2013, but finally admits falling off the wagon with defendant.    Plaintiff claims defendant broke into her condo during the day when she was at work.  (Personal note-what recovering, sober alcoholic keeps a bunch of booze in their apartment?   Plaintiff does).   Both fathers of litigants are delusional, and don't seem to believe anything is their adult kids' fault.   Defendant father tries to say that plaintiff daughter's boyfriend could have damaged the apartment, because of alleged domestic violence, and a no contact order that plaintiff ignores.  As usual, plaintiff father says defendant is a drunk, and ignores his daughter's fall off the wagon, and ten year history, and abusive boyfriend.   $679 to plaintiff.  

Antique Hide and Seek-Plaintiff consigned antique furniture to defendant's shop, and when plaintiff found the dining table pads she didn't see her furniture in the store.   It is alleged that store owner hides furniture consignments until the contract expires (180 days), and after that time he doesn't have to pay the consigner their cut of the sales.   When woman came in the store, he claims it sold and she would be getting a check.   It was on the web site for his business, after the contract expired.    $1590 for plaintiff.   What a sleaze the defendant is. 

Second-

Seizure Shakedown-Plaintiff/former friend loaned defendant/former friend money that he now calls a gift.  It was for a plane ticket, bail money, and other things.  Current defendant girl friend says she talked with plaintiff about plane ticket plaintiff paid for to get defendant back home.    Defendant supposedly had seizure, and needed to get back to New Jersey.   Man doesn't remember the doctor or hospital where he was treated.    Defendant also missed court date while he was in California, for a speeding citation.   Plaintiff loaned him the bail money.  $428 for plane ticket.   

Valentine's Day Forgiveness-Plaintiff suing ex-boyfriend for cost of Toyota Corolla, and repairs.    Plaintiff bought a $2400 2004 Toyota Corolla, and stopped paying him with $1,000 left on the car, so he repossessed the car.    $1500 to plaintiff for the car.   

[AngelaHunter]

9 hours ago, Byrd is the Word said:

But my bottom line is that I find it impossible to either sympathize or empathize with anyone who rents a room in their home to a homeless woman with two grown kids.

Normally I couldn't agree more. Middleaged women renting places to frat boys ("He slept in and didn't scrub the bathroom to white glove cleanliness!") and recently released criminals ("He stole my stuff!" duh...) and all that ludicrous crap, but in this case the plaintiff is 19 so I kind of give her a pass. It did blow up in her face, but hopefully, she learned a good lesson. Def is a 54 old woman with two grown, useless hulks who huddle in one bedroom with Mom and "all hell breaks loose" if the Wi-fi goes down - something of prime importance when you're homeless -  when sons are right in the middle of a video game, of intense studying for exams. Mom, with her phony hand-wringing and sincere imploring, is a professional squatter/grifter who knows exactly how to worm her way out of paying rent and how to take advantage. "The city inspectors told me to stop paying rent and of course, I always obey higher authority (if it works to my advantage) so did just that". Son can afford to get those ridiculous Medusa-like things glued to his head so why couldn't he help his poor Momma by getting a job and getting them the hell away from the slumlord plaintiff and her horrific, PTSD-inducing reign of terror?  On a superficial note, I kept getting distracted by the natural beauty and poise of the plaintiff.

1 hour ago, patty1h said:

That gob looked like an exploded Whoopie cushion.

I guess that's next on my viewing list. 🤣

[DoctorK]

Two new episodes today (according to Cox, and they all looked new to me). I enjoyed the first case, the middle aged woman with blue/white corn rows who decided that it was just the time to get pregnant. She went out randomly and found a complete loser who already had seven or eight kids that he doesn't support, which worked out as well as we would expect. The interesting part was when JJ tossed out her case, she puffed up to her full (and substantial) bulk, violently snatched up her phone and all of her paperwork then started storming out of the court room. Our hero Byrd came up behind her and told her to leave the papers, she ignored him and huffed and puffed her way out. I really wanted Byrd to go hands on on this particularly annoying and stupid plaintiff. Hope she had to walk home for breaking the rules.

[CrazyInAlabama]

5 p.m. episodes, both new-

First-

Silk Purse From a Sow's Ear-Plaintiff suing ex-boyfriend for 2 months rent, ambulance bill,  two tickets for setting of false alarms, and stalking.   Litigants were shacked up, had a kid, he lost his job, and didn't pay the rent.   Plaintiff wants back rent (and he was unemployed?).  Plaintiff claims defendant set the alarm off twice using the app, but defendant says he set the alarm off twice getting his stuff back.  Defendant punched a hole in the door, and he was arrested for damage to property, and something else.   Plaintiff tries to charge JJ's bench, and I really hoped Byrd would tackle her.   Plaintiff was charged $85 each for the alarms, and the door repair, and defendant claims he paid restitution.   Plaintiff also claims her son got sick, day care called, and defendant was supposed to pick son up, six days after the big blow up.   (On a shallow note, is the plaintiff's hair supposed to be cute?) Plaintiff then told defendant the child was sick, and defendant picked up kid(she already had a protective order against defendant too).   Defendant took him to urgent care, and then an ambulance was called, and she objects to paying for the ambulance.    Defendant has seven children, plaintiff found this loser, got knocked up, and now wants to be paid for this?    Urgent care does not call an ambulance for a kid with a cold, so plaintiff is a fool too.    When defendant moved out, plaintiff says she put all of his property out on the curb.     

Byrd looks like he would like to help the plaintiff leave via a foot up her fanny.   I do love the plaintiff's stomping out of court, and the hall-terviews. 

Defendant gets $500, plaintiff gets nothing.    

Teen Cheating Ruins Aruba Vacay-Plaintiff suing ex-boyfriend for a non-refundable flight to Aruba ($770 for ticket), in July, and they broke up in March.    (Is the defendant's hair stylish or something?   It looks hideous).   The ticket is non-refundable, and only in defendant's name, but he can change destinations.   Defendant says no payment was ever mentioned.  Case dismissed.    (in the hall, defendant says he's using his ticket to go to Hawaii). Plaintiff is a vindictive little fool isn't she?   

Second-

Supermodel Reality Check-(This is the dog attack one, where JJ responds to the defendant's obvious lies by saying she's Christie Brinkley, if his ludicrous story is true).    Plaintiff is suing idiot defendant for his dog attacking her dog.    Defendant has a ridiculous story about the attack.   Defendant and wife swore to different stories.   Defendant's miniature Rottweiler (40 lbs or so) {No such thing as a Mini Rottweiler, just because it has the coloring) attacked the Yorkie cross.  Plaintiff witness was walking the dog for owner, and dog was on leash.  Defendant man claims (wife wasn't there) he came in from the garage with Mini Rott., and holding dog's leash (I don't believe this at all), and when he went on the porch he took his dog off leash.    When Bozo got outside, little dog was on ground, on leash, being attacked by the defendant's dog (off leash).   JJ doesn't believe the attacking dog was on  a flexi leash (I don't believe it either).  Defendant suing because her vicious dog was quarantined, and this was emotionally damaging to her. I don't believe the defendant when she says the dog was quarantined at home for 90 days, that's either a repeat attack, or no rabies shot.     Defendant case dismissed, plaintiff gets $1750   

Paid in Cigs and Soda-Plaintiff suing niece's father (her former tenant) for unpaid rent and a damaged couch.  Defendant swears he never signed a lease, and claims plaintiff has long criminal background, and stole identities.    Defendant's young daughter lived in the room, slept on the couch, and was going to move when he got his own place.   Defendant is counter suing for damaged property, and vet bills.  (Plaintiff is out to lunch).  Plaintiff is a tenant, who subleased, and doesn't even have a lease.   Case dismissed.   

Edited August 27, 2019 by CrazyInAlabama

[AngelaHunter]

10 minutes ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

 Defendant's miniature Rottweiler

Haven't seen this, but if a litigant is calling his dog a "miniature Rottweiler" there is no such thing. It could be a stunted puppy mill special or a mutt that has Rottie colouring.

[Claire76]

16 hours ago, SRTouch said:

Alas, DIRECTV is still fussing with my JJ provider. .... no JJ since July 4th😢😢😢

I've just watched them on Hulu.

[AngelaHunter]

1 hour ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

Paid in Cigs and Soda-Plaintiff suing niece's father (her former tenant) for unpaid rent and a damaged couch.

"Richard Parker III" - high falutin' handle for this ignorant, jug-headed, druggie hillbilly. Even funnier is "Richard Parker" is the name of the tiger in "Life of Pi" and I'm sure he'd be mortified at his namesake. 

Plaintiff (who appeared to be toothless?) can't get anything straight. When did Sir Richard Parker III move in? "September 15, nineteen eighty - twenty-nineteen, nineteen-twenty, twenty-twenty... argghhh!" Seriously, why is JJ asking such difficult questions? Richard has a young daughter (who is escorted out so she can't see her father getting flayed alive) who gets dragged around and bunks in crazy plaintiff's apartment, even though Richard says plaintiff is a criminal, a forger and has been to jail. He's such a failure at parenting he feels okay exposing his child to this, while he sacks out on the sofa in which plaintiff claims he made all kinds of holes. Plaintiff does allow that Richard Parker III would do her laundry (OMG) when she didn't feel able to haul her monumental caboose up and down the stairs. Is everyone frickin' nuts? This would have been truly hilarious were it not for a child being forced to live this way, among lunatics and losers.

[Mrs Shibbles]

Two observations

In the homeless/ “slumlord” case, when the plaintiff was discussing the defendant unplugging the internet, she said her sweet angel son with PTSD was playing Grand Theft Auto, and she implied she was afraid of how he would react towards  the defendant about unplugging the internet.  Classy parenting there.

in the case yesterday where the woman’s biological clock was ticking, so she chose to get knocked up by a loser, she tried to play the Sainted Single Mother card at the end of the show, and Judge Judy immediately shut her down. 

[AngelaHunter]

1 hour ago, Mrs Shibbles said:

her sweet angel son with PTSD was playing Grand Theft Auto,

I loved how she changed it to "homework" thinking JJ wouldn't catch that. She did. Did the little "Grand Theft Auto" fan have PTSD from the horrific Reign of Terror?

1 hour ago, Mrs Shibbles said:

she tried to play the Sainted Single Mother card 

I remember one of them announcing "I'm a single mother!" in a way calculated to garner sympathy or admiration. "So?" JJ said. "That doesn't make you the Madonna." 🤣

[bad things are bad]

Quote

Defendant says no payment was ever mentioned.  Case dismissed.    (in the hall, defendant says he's using his ticket to go to Hawaii). Plaintiff is a vindictive little fool isn't she?   

I didn't think she was really vindictive. I can't imagine a 19 year old expecting to pay for the BF's ticket. Defendant talking about going to Hawaii is pretty snotty, though

[CrazyInAlabama]

3 p.m. both reruns, from 2016 or so-

First-

Mixed-Up Priorities-Plaintiff wants refund on used car he bought from defendant, and claims it came with a 30 day warranty.      Defendant repossessed car for non-payment too.   2002 E series Mercedes (silver).   Purchase price was $3500, with $1000 down, and payments for the $2500.   He claims he made two payments, and in cash, and the  receipts were in the car when it was repossessed.    (Shallow note, who did the defendant's eyeliner?   It's all crooked, and looks like I did it).    Car was repossessed in February for non-payment.   Plaintiff says car had issues, and he thinks dealer should pay for it, but he claims an oral change covers the warranty provision.    However, there is a written contract that says nothing about warranty or repairs.   Defendant won't get her repo costs back, because it isn't in the contract either.     Plaintiff wants money for his rims too, no way he's getting that. Case dismissed. (I bet Byrd wasn't doing a puzzle during this case, the plaintiff is looking at JJ with total rage).  

Single Moms Split-Plaintiff and defendant were roommates, and single mothers, they moved in together with two adults, and two kids in a one bedroom apartment.   Bigger apartment wasn't available yet, but they put down a deposit to hold apartment for them, then defendant changed her mind.   They didn't move into apartment, and can't get deposit back.  Plaintiff actually moved stuff into new apartment, so defendant gets her security deposit back, $550 to defendant.

Second-

American Bully Puppies for Sale-(This is going to be bad, idiot breeder of dog cropped the dogs' ears himself.   I wish Byrd would show the plaintiff what ear cropping without anesthetic feels like).    Plaintiffs have been breeding and selling Bullys online, and defendant breeds them also, and bought two to breed from plaintiffs.    One puppy was $1700, and the second was $1500, with only $100 down, pending income tax refund coming in.   Dogs weren't paid off by defendant,    Idiot plaintiff man butchered the dog's ear crop, there's a text that it was his first time cropping ears.   Defendant didn't take either puppy to vet for vet check until two weeks later.   One dog started having seizures, and three vets were consulted.  Vet reports don't say seizure, but NSAID overdose.  Another vet says possible heart murmur.       Defendant says she can't show the dogs without papers, but American Bullies aren't AKC anyway, just American Bullies organization, and they register anything (it says so).   I can't tell you how much I loathe everyone in this case. (Girlfriend of plaintiff is saying defendant is shady, and she's running with the loser boyfriend who cuts off ears?)

Plaintiffs get $2500 for puppies.

Postdated Check Hell-Plaintiff gave defendant a post-dated check to buy a car, and said she would tell the dealership not to cash until the date on the check.   $1205, was the check, and car only cost $2200.     Defendant never paid the money back to plaintiff.  Plaintiff went to the bank, stopped payment on the check, and closed the account.  Defendant claims she would find the money, and take that to the car dealership, and get the check back.   Then the car dealer cashed the check, and collections came after plaintiff for the $1200.   Defendant has the car, and so was credited by the dealership with the $1200.   Plaintiff gets $1200, not $1400 to cover the charges on the post-dated check. 

[CrazyInAlabama]

5 p.m. episodes, first one is rerun from 2018-2019, second is new-(or at least my lying cable guide says so).

First-(Rerun)-

Man Brings Wife and Girlfriend to Court-Defendant is girlfriend of plaintiff. Plaintiff,  cheating husband, and his wife are in court.   Plaintiff alleges multiple unpaid loans.   Plaintiff claims just a work friendship, but defendant says they were cheating together.    Plaintiff's wife looks thrilled to be in court with lying, cheating husband, and his girlfriend.   The $1600 loan for defendant's son's car was acknowledged as a loan.   $1600 for plaintiff,.   

If You're Psychotic and You Know It, Clap Your Hands-Plaintiff suing former landlord for security deposit, value of belongings, and illegal eviction.    Defendant wants unpaid rent.  Plaintiff claims her boyfriend wasn't crazy, or abusive, and was barely there.   Defendant says boyfriend beat on plaintiff, says boyfriend was nuts, and wanted plaintiff to get a restraining order against her boyfriend.   Landlady also claims boyfriend was a virtual tenant, and violent.   Defendant claims police escorted plaintiff through her house to pick up her purse, and other belongings.  Plaintiff claims she didn't get her purse and license, but is sent out of court to get her purse, and see what date it was issued, before or after the eviction.   $175 to plaintiff, deducted from $375 owed to defendant.

Second-(New)-

Valentine's Day Curse-Plaintiff claims he wasn't engaged to defendant, though she claims they were, and the ring she didn't give back is hers. Defendant moved into plaintiff's house with her 17 year old daughter, until the big fight six weeks later.  Defendant also claims police officer friends of plaintiff arrested her without cause.     Defendant claims she gave ring back to plaintiff.      The ring issue is the only one left.   $250 to plaintiff (no receipt).

Child Slapping and Cat Cutting-Plaintiff suing daughter for unpaid loans for daughter's cat's vet bills, after defendant injured her own cat.   Defendant says there was no expectation of repayment.    Defendant claims her father hit her child while child was in plaintiff's custody after CPS removed child from mother (child was removed in July of 2015, when she was two), and placed with plaintiff when she was six.    Defendant told CPS about the alleged abuse of her child by plaintiff, and child was placed elsewhere again, grandparents haven't seen her since.   Defendant wants money for plaintiff's 'abuse' of her child, and is told to forget it.   Defendant lives with child's father, and some other friend.  

JJ finds out who father of child (who is living with defendant, who can't be near child) placed child with, that CPS wasn't notified, and is reporting the situation to L.A. County CPS now.  

Cat injury is awful, defendant was trimming fur mats, and cut the animal's skin, and vet bills were $883.  Plaintiff gets vet bills loan repaid $883

(Tomorrow's first new episode is another dog attack with the delusional owner interrupting constantly.   The case sounds awful).

Edited August 28, 2019 by CrazyInAlabama

[AngelaHunter]

1 hour ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

Valentine's Day Curse

I read the blurb on my DVR - Valentine's day, ring, fight, police called - and figured it was two silly young idiots trying to play house. I was surprised (although I don't know why) to see two middleaged, reasonable-looking people standing there.  How deceiving appearances can be. ShortAss Shockey and Looney Luna sounded ridiculous and both of them seemed to have a problem telling the truth, especially Shockey. Her grammar - "we was", "we wasn't" , "I seen" hurt my ears. Just awful. My husband and I have had arguments but never needed to call the police. Getting the cuffs slapped on and being thrown into a police car didn't seem to be as traumatic for Luna as it would be for me.  The only person who made sense was Mr. Shockey's former squeeze, for whom he originally bought this ring, who ditched him and probably with very good reason.

Shockey wants his ring back.

JJ: "Do you have a receipt for the ring"?
S: "Yes, it's right here."

JJ: "This isn't a receipt. It's an appraisal." 

S: "I don't have the receipt." (even though I just said I did)

Why do so many litigants do this? They say they have something, and it turns out they don't have it at all. And they look even more idiotic when they have to admit they were lying and trying to pull a really dumb fast one.

Case dismissed.

Shockey: "Can I come back with the receipt?" 🤣

GTFO, you bozo.

3 hours ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

Mixed-Up Priorities-Plaintiff wants refund on used car

I remember this one! He put 1,000$ rims on a 13-year-old Mercedes instead of making the payments. Hilarious and something you'd expect from an 18-year-old. And yeah, the stink-eye he was giving JJ was near-lethal. He blames her because he's an idiot. 

[CrazyInAlabama]

3 p.m. episodes, both reruns 2016 probably-

First-

Barbershop Brawl-Plaintiff accuses his barber, and former friend of attacking him with a gun, a straight razor, and a barbecue fork.     Two men started fighting, police were called, but before they arrived defendant went after plaintiff again.  However, plaintiff claims they locked nutso barber inside the shop with a gun, and razor, and plaintiff outside (not believing a word of it).

Defendant says plaintiff demanded an appointment, started a fight, plaintiff was told to leave, and locked out.   Defendant says when he left via the back door, plaintiff jumped him.  Plaintiff says he went to the hospital, but didn't file charges with the police.   Case dismissed, and yes, JJ is serious.    

Mom Owes Me-Plaintiff son totals his mother's car, and is suing her.   Mother co-signed the car loan with loser son/plaintiff.   Police report said 50/50 responsibility for accident.   Mother had another car, and it was covered by gap insurance, but the Nissan the son wrecked didn't have gap insurance.   Son claims that mother should have bought the Jeep first, and then it would have had gap insurance.     Mother at first agreed to pay son the $3k, but changed her mind.   Plaintiff gets $3k.   

Second-

Grandparents' Rights Now-Plaintiff's are suing their former attorney for fees paid to him to fight for visitation with their grandchildren.    Defendant claims that couple never had a marriage, and therefore, the payments from plaintiffs to get the son a divorce was bogus.   Plaintiff's son was convicted and sentenced to prison, and they hired the attorney to get visitation with the son's children.    Plaintiff's witness is mother of children, but was never married to father of children.   Attorney claims the son claimed to be common law married to plaintiff witness/mother of children, and needed a divorce to get visitation.   

Plaintiff witness claims she didn't appear in divorce court, but attorney claims it there was a divorce hearing with plaintiff's witness testifying.  There was a hearing in divorce court, but the son and girlfriend reconciled, so divorce was dismissed.    Agreement with attorney says he was hired for divorce of son, not custody hearing.    The grandparents had son living with them, before prison, and the did the divorce so they could get temporary visitation.    Attorney did substantial work for the divorce and custody case.    Attorney is counter suing for unpaid fees.   Texas has common law marriage, so grandmother is stupid claiming it doesn't exist.      There were videos of two robberies by the son, and he received two concurrent sentences for robbery, and had a drug problem   Dad or stepdad is offended that the son/stepson was called a druggie.  Case dismissed.  In the Hall-terview, grandparents still don't get that there are no grandparents' rights.  

The Dating List-Plaintiff suing ex-boyfriend for various unpaid loans she made him.   He repaid a $500 loan, but not the smaller 'loans' for things such as, dinner out. Case dismissed. 

Edited August 29, 2019 by CrazyInAlabama

[AngelaHunter]

21 minutes ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

Barbershop Brawl-Plaintiff accuses his barber, and former friend of attacking him with a gun, a straight razor, and a barbecue fork.

Sounds about right, for this show. 🤣🤣 Another incompetent nitwit, if the attackee is still here to tell the tale.

[CrazyInAlabama]

5 p.m. episodes, both New!-

First-

Labrador Takes a Bite Out of a Terrier-Plaintiff was walking her dog, Lulu (Jack Russell Terrier)on leash when the defendant's 70 lb. Labrador crossed the street and attacked the dog.  She wants $1500+ for vet bills.

Defendant has a stupid story, she claims she pulled in her driveway, unloading groceries, and with her two dogs in the car.   She opened the car door, and claims plaintiff dog actually charged her SUV, and dogs.   She also claims the dog was defending the car and property.   Defendant claims the Lab didn't bite the other dog.  (Actually, plaintiff and defendant need to stop interrupting the testimony, and they're ticking off Officer Byrd). 

Defendant promised to make payments, but lied.      $1536 for plaintiff's vet bills.

Another One Bytes the Dust-Plaintiff is suing for $2500 (computer cost, and lost wages) from defendant/computer technician.  Plaintiff claims she had a verbal contract with defendant for computer lessons on her new computer, and she gave him her old computer (a now 11 year old computer, that was originally $1,000).   Defendant took a printer to plaintiff's house, and he's been to her house several other times.     Sadly, plaintiff is somehow compromised, and seems not too connected with reality.  Case dismissed.   

Second-

Insulin Emergency-Plaintiff suing former roommate for breaking a lease, and damaging their apartment.   They had a two bedroom apartment, and he sublet a bedroom to the defendant.   Plaintiff says defendant had various, virtually live ins through the apartment, including one that started forwarding his mail to their apartment, and then there was the last boyfriend that not only was violent, but caused damages.      Photos of damages to wall, and other damages.   Defendant counter suing for $2500 for security deposit, and lost insulin.      If not having insulin is so critical, then why didn't she take it with her when she moved out?  Plaintiff claims defendant owes $700 for unpaid rent.   $278 to plaintiff, nothing to defendant.   

Traded Then Stolen-Plaintiff suing defendant for car, that defendant says was later stolen, but he can't remember when it went missing.    Plaintiff traded the car to defendant, but it was never registered in his name, so she was stuck with the impound and towing fees.   Plaintiff's insurance on car expired the same month she traded the car to defendant.   Defendant has no idea when the car was stolen.     Nothing to plaintiff, she let defendant take her uninsured car, and never did the paperwork to register it to him.    

Edited August 30, 2019 by CrazyInAlabama

[AngelaHunter]

So, like, basically I was irritated with the dopey but perfectly coiffed 28-year old student, Mr. Schwartz, who seemed to be here with his mommy in tow(?), suing idiotic def who looked like she belonged in a parochial school but liked to get her freak on with Devonte in her room. Funny how they're always the ones who are "wild at heart." Byrd found them mighty annoying. 

But then; Ms. Hensley, who made the previous litigants seem completely mundane. I actually said "Holy shit!" out loud when she made her grand entrance. Even her dipshit little pony-tailed, memory-impaired buddy paled in comparison. Or maybe he was high. Who knows?  She had no idea about selling/trading cars! She didn't know she needed insurance on a car she let that nitwit drive around and get it stolen, so he says. How would she know that? She's just a little lady.

She does need to be remembered though.

[Toaster Strudel]

ALL the litigants in the Divine case looked like they walked out of a John Waters movie.

[CrazyInAlabama]

3 p.m. episodes, probably 2016, both reruns-

First-

Buy High, Sell Low-Plaintiffs suing defendant over a car sale.   PLaintiffs bought the truck, and a lien release on title, but they couldn't register it because of the lien. Defendant never paid the sales tax, or registered the truck.   Defendant paid $3500 for truck, sold it four months later, but still owed $1500 for truck.   Defendant claims he paid the $1500 on truck when he sold it, and paid off the lien.    Plaintiffs bought truck, but couldn't register it, and will be given the money for the sales tax, so they can register the truck.  $553 was sales tax for plaintiff, and they want to be paid for emissions, inspection, and insurance (not happening except sales tax).    JJ's right, defendant is a hustler.   $553 to plaintiffs

Stolen and Stripped-Plaintiff suing defendant over car he claims was stolen, and stripped at the defendant's auto body shop.    Car was on street in front of auto body shop, but defendant claims a man tried to sell the car to him.     Defendant says he was suspicious of the car's cheap price, man parked car and was picked up, and car was deserted there. 

 Defendant says he was never in the car, but plaintiff's witness (tow truck driver) claims he saw defendant in the car, and people were working on the auto body shop lot.   Defendant says  that tow truck driver couldn't have been going to the tow company he claims, because that shop has been vacant since defendant's had his business next door.   JJ believes the witness, and police report, so $2000 to plaintiff. 

Second-

Italian Mastiff Mating Mess-(I hate both of these people, they obviously breed anything to anything, sell on the internet to strangers, and never go to the vet for proper care.  Sadly for all of us, the plaintiff who seems very confused, works at a hospital, please tell me it's not in patient care). Two despicable amateur dog breeders suing each other.   Plaintiff studded her Cane Corso out for defendant's female, and for two picks of litter..   

However, defendant claims all of the puppies died, so plaintiff wants stud fee.   All of the puppies died within three days of birth.   Plaintiff said this was the only breeding for her stud, but she actually had a female that had a litter, and of twelve puppies, all but three died from parvo, and the survivors were sold (two to defendant, and then she took one puppy  to vet, and it died of parvo).    The second puppy died also.   There are texts saying the defendant will pay a stud fee of $800.   $800 to plaintiff.  

Family Friendly Drinking-Driver and passenger fight over blame for a car crash that occurred when they were both drunk.   Plaintiff 38 year old mother, was drinking with her daughter and friend (both 20), then daughter, and defendant were driving drunk.   Defendant has a suspended license (she claims for unpaid parking tickets).   Plaintiff had liability insurance on the car, and it's still driveable.   Defendant was driving (drunk), with plaintiff daughter (drunk too).   Defendant was arrested and cited for drunk driving, and driving without a license.    

Sadly, defendant works in home healthcare.     Scary.     

Plaintiff and defendant will share the cost, because they're both responsible.   $2100 to plaintiff. 

[Brattinella]

Okay, so just WHAT should Dad have done when he was turned down for a loan (co-sign) for his daughter's student loan??  Sell his house?  Sell his body parts?  What?  If Mom can't cover it, then get a J.O.B. darling girl!

[CrazyInAlabama]

5 p.m. episodes, both new-

First-

Lesbian Choking Catfight-Plaintiff says her estranged wife's daughter assaulted her on Thanksgiving.  What a surprise, adult beverages were involved.    Plaintiff and wife invited daughter, and grandkids over for the holiday weekend.    Then, the adults went to a bar, played pool, and then wife started arguing, both wives were name calling each other.   They went home, plaintiff went to get snack, and step daughter attack punches plaintiff, and kept pounding her in the face.  

Police were called, ambulance was called, and defendant was arrested.   Defendant claims the two wives were shoving, and yelling, daughter interceded.   Defendant claims plaintiff laid down on the floor having a tantrum or break down, and claims plaintiff was choking defendant.   Police report says no marks on defendant throat from the 'choking'.   Police report is very different from both litigant's stories.   Plaintiff says after assault she crawled into the kitchen, and armed herself with a knife for protection.    Police wanted charges of domestic violence against defendant, but that didn't happen.      

Plaintiff ended up in hospital for several days.  Prosecutor didn't file charges because everyone involved was drunk.    Case dismissed, defendant spent two days in jail.

Retaliatory Mood Swing-Plaintiff suing former landlord for property damage, harassment, and something else.   Plaintiff moved out after defendant moved his fiance in (she's now his wife), and they didn't get along.    Plaintiff claims after she moved out of the house, that defendant dumped her stuff at her work place.    Defendant waited until after the agreed on move out day, and she didn't pick her stuff up, so he dumped it at her work place.    Plaintiff also damaged the wife's car, court case resulted, and plaintiff was supposed to pay restitution.   Plaintiff hasn't paid restitution for the car yet, and JJ points out that an arrest in her future.     Case dismissed.   

Second-

College Graduation Turmoil-Plaintiff is suing her brother for money owed for his daughter's college tuition.    Plaintiff made an arrangement with brother for a loan to pay for the daughter's tuition.  Defendant says arrangement was between plaintiff and the niece.  Application for student loan for freshman year was denied, and aunt told niece to ask her father to co-sign and reapply.    Niece asked father to reapply, and it was again rejected (he apparently has terrible credit).    Defendant told daughter that loan was disapproved again.  Sorry JJ but I wouldn't co-sign for anyone.    

Daughter asked aunt for a loan. and defendant paid $4k back to the plaintiff.   Defendant said he could no longer pay her $4k a semester for the daughter.    Plaintiff refused to take the $300 payments, on advise of court personnel, or it would be considered a settlement.   

However, the daughter never had a job during school, so she (in my view) wasn't doing her part to raise the money.    Daughter needs money for school, but has microbladed eyebrows?   $5k to plaintiff.   (My guess is daughter waited too late to get standard student loans, and had to try for private ones.   I wonder if daughter's credit was really bad also, as well as the father's credit)

Walking on Eggshells-Plaintiffs and defendants signed a lease for a 4 bedroom house for a year.  However, lease is only in plaintiffs' names, and defendants aren't signatories on lease.  Plaintiff's want defendants to pay the rent after they moved out, and the shortfall in their rent.   Defendants moved out because of attitude from plaintiffs.    Defendants didn't try to find a replacement tenant, and neither did the plaintiffs.   Plaintiffs get $1500 for the leftover rent.    

Edited September 5, 2019 by CrazyInAlabama

[Cobalt Stargazer]

7 minutes ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

Plaintiff ended up in hospital for several days.  Prosecutor didn't file charges because everyone involved was drunk.    Case dismissed, defendant spent two days in jail.

Of note: the defendant is, of course, a single mother with a son.

She's twenty-six.

Her son's nine.

[One Tough Cookie]

I am sorta disabled and can't do much writing or typing, but I LOVE this forum and the hilarious insights. Thanks for all the laughs!! 

Edited August 30, 2019 by One Tough Cookie

[AngelaHunter]

1 hour ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

College Graduation Turmoil-

The no-credit Charles Turcio was gross.  He's got his 34-year old bum son hanging around the house all day, no doubt sucking up disability payments and Charles is probably doing the same thing, so sorry - he can't help his daughter go to college. If he had started paying his sister a couple hundred dollars a month instead of putting her off, they probably wouldn't have been here but he only offers the 300$ after he gets served.  Daughter really should get a job. She has enough money for the micro bladed brows and the piercings and the hair, etc. 

The four trailer-trashy, inbred-looking nitwits fighting over rent and all that - oh, shut up.

1 hour ago, Cobalt Stargazer said:

Of note: the defendant is, of course, a single mother with a son.

She's twenty-six.

Her son's nine.

But isn't 16 or 17 the median age for litigants to start breeding?

20 hours ago, Toaster Strudel said:

ALL the litigants in the Divine case looked like they walked out of a John Waters movie.

What? They had witnesses or "moral support" there? I couldn't take my eyes off Ms. Hensley so must have missed them.

[AngelaHunter]

3 hours ago, One Tough Cookie said:

I am sorta disabled and can't do much writing or typing, but I LOVE this forum and the hilarious insights. Thanks for all the laughs!! 

Very sorry to hear that, but glad you can get a few giggles here. This is my "go-to" when I dearly need a laugh and it never lets me down.

[SRTouch]

Ah, first JJ since July didn't disappoint. I found the drunk & brawling lesbian and her equally drunk soon to be ex-daughter in law entertaining. Though I did think JJ was unfair to poor responding officer who wrote the police report. Sure the report was disjointed and didn't establish a logical timeline - but, good grief, the litigants didn't establish much of a logical sequence in court when they were presumably sober. 

Then we had something about a landlord/roommate/protective order/car vandalism..... not sure WTH suit/countersuit were about, but case was over pretty quickly. Make sure you catch defendant's hallterview about how he dumped her stuff. Dude can't keep from laughing as he described how he had her stuff on plywood on rollers in the back of his truck, went to her workplace and rolled it off his truck.

Not at all impressed with anyone in the Aunt suing her brother (dad) for not taking out a loan to pay for his daughter  (her niece) for college. Pops comes across as a bum - scraggly 2 week old beard, sloppy dresser - JJ has to spoonfeed him answers to make him appear a tiny bit better - not sure what was going on in case, maybe JJ was hostile to pops because she knew something we didn't? Like I said, everyone in case turned me off and I didn't bother to pause the DVR  when I left the room.

Last case was rental dispute between 2 cousin couples who agreed to live together. P had tough time getting it through her thick head that she and her hubby were only ones who signed the lease - then defendant gets chance to play dumb when he can't answer when he and his wifey-poo moved in or out. P want money cuz D bailed 6 months early. Pretty simple - D agrees he and wife agreed to the 1 year lease - neither P nor D made any effort to mitigate, so JJ decides the two sides should split the shortfall.

[DoctorK]

4 minutes ago, SRTouch said:

Dude can't keep from laughing as he described how he had her stuff on plywood on rollers in the back of his truck, went to her workplace and rolled it off his truck.

Yep, I was laughing too, maybe not the right thing to do legally but it was still funny and appropriate. It would be even better if he lowered his tailgate and backed up towards her place of employment, hit the brakes and let it roll out on its own.

[Byrd is the Word]

8 hours ago, SRTouch said:

Though I did think JJ was unfair to poor responding officer who wrote the police report. Sure the report was disjointed and didn't establish a logical timeline - but, good grief, the litigants didn't establish much of a logical sequence in court when they were presumably sober. 

It surprised me that according to the police report, the plaintiff wasn’t attested because she went to the hospital. It reminded me of a time a couple of years ago when I went to the busy ER late at night for couple of stitches.  The place was loaded with police from a few neighboring communities. I asked the Dr. what the issue was and she told me that it happens often when perps are on their way to jail complain of chest pain or difficulty breathing so they’re taken to the ER first before jail. The staff calls it “incarceritus”. Classic!

[AngelaHunter]

17 hours ago, SRTouch said:

 I found the drunk & brawling lesbian and her equally drunk soon to be ex-daughter in law entertaining.

Lovely, it was. Another heartwarming tale of family togetherness at Thanksgiving. 🧡 OH, well, except for the drunken, brutal brawling, choking, black eyes, smashed beer bottles and police calls, that is.  I found it not entertaining at all. Those ladies play rough, for sure. The best part is the 9-year-old boy who witnessed this disgraceful debacle. No doubt he will grow up with great regard and respect for women.  Nicely done, mom.  So, both parties came here to air their dirtiest, most sordid laundry and all for nothing. Nice going, ladies.  Did anyone notice the audience member with the blue eyeshadow who was sitting behind the def? She simply could not stop laughing while listening to this revolting tale.

17 hours ago, SRTouch said:

Though I did think JJ was unfair to poor responding officer who wrote the police report.

I agree. These vile, nutty broads made no sense here. Imagine trying to get facts from them post-battle, while they were all still piss-drunk?  Eww.

17 hours ago, SRTouch said:

Then we had something about a landlord/roommate/protective order/car vandalism.....

Wow. Ms. Costa, who appears to comb her hair with an eggbeater, was way out there.  Ms. Costa, I have to inform you that the wild and tousled look is not sexy at your age. It merely makes you look more demented than you probably are. 

9 hours ago, Byrd is the Word said:

The staff calls it “incarceritus”.

Wonderful! It would be even funnier if the public didn't have to pay for these scumbag criminals to pull a final scam. 

[CrazyInAlabama]

3 p.m., both reruns, probably from 2016-

First-(bumped by drag racing, no, I'm not kidding).

Second-(first case bumped by more drag racing)-

Water World Debacle-Former landlady suing former tenant for unpaid rent.    Tenant says she doesn't owe back rent because the city water department said that the front hose needed a cut off device, and two toilets that ran constantly.   How did the city inspector know about this?   I'm betting the deadbeat tenant told the city about it.   Tenant was also getting her rent subsidized, and I'm betting the rent non-payment was about the time the subsidy ran out.   

Tenant installed a portable Jacuzzi/hot tub, and a portable pool, so I'm betting that's why the water bill went way up.     $1444, for two months rent to plaintiff.    Landlord keeps security deposit $1100.  

[CrazyInAlabama]

5 p.m. episodes, both reruns, probably 2018-2019-

First-

Ice Cream Parlor Owner Not So Sweet-Plaintiff contractor/defendant suing defendant for slandering him online.   Plaintiff was contracted to supervise an ice cream parlor renovation, then defendant  decided to sub-contract herself, hired unlicensed subs, and wanted the design fee back from former contractor.  Plaintiff gave a $1750 refund, but defendant wants the other $1,000 back.    Defendant proceeded to make a lying vicious complaint to the Better Business Bureau, and then slander the contractor and BBB online.     When JJ reads what the woman posted, it's disgusting, vicious, and rotten.  

Online postings by defendant claims plaintiff stole two thousand dollars, and claims he reported her to codes inspectors for the city.    Defendant hired someone else for $6300, and that's what the original contractor/plaintiff said it would cost her.    Plaintiff says city inspector called him, after defendant contacted the inspector.  $2500 for plaintiff.  

Second-

Don't Pee on my Leg and Tell Me It's Raining-Two sides are fighting over a pontoon boat hitting another parked pontoon boat.  However, the second pontoon boat was parked in the canal, not the dock.    Plaintiff claims defendant hit his pontoon boat, that was tied up to the sea wall, not the actual sheltered moorings.      Defendant says he didn't hit the plaintiff's boat.   Plaintiff claims defendant asked him to not file a police report, but defendant denies this also.   Plaintiff waited 90 days to file police report.   Plaintiff's witness works for the plaintiff.   Witness has no evidence to prove she called the owners about the accident.     

Plaintiff partner accused defendant of hitting the boat, and defendant says boat was parked on the sea wall, and not in a slip where it would be safer.   Case dismissed without prejudice, because JJ things the plaintiff have zero evidence.